Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2002;22:147-152
doi: 10.1161/hq0102.101770
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, I. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cockcroft, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, I. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cockcroft, J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis
Right arrow Risk Factors for Stroke
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2002;22:147.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Pulse-Wave Analysis

Clinical Evaluation of a Noninvasive, Widely Applicable Method for Assessing Endothelial Function

Ian B. Wilkinson; Ian R. Hall; Helen MacCallum; Isla S. Mackenzie; Carmel M. McEniery; Bart J. van der Arend; Yae-Eun Shu; Laura S. MacKay; David J. Webb; John R. Cockcroft

From the Clinical Pharmacology Units, University of Cambridge (I.B.W., I.S.M., C.M.M.), Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, England, and the University of Edinburgh (H.M., B.J.v.d.A., Y.-E.S., L.S.M., D.J.W.), Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, and the Department of Cardiology (I.R.H., J.R.C.), University of Wales College of Medicine, University Hospital, Cardiff, Wales.

Correspondence to Dr I.B. Wilkinson, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. E-mail ibw20{at}cam.ac.uk


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Currentmethods for assessing vasomotor endothelial function are impractical for use in large studies. We tested the hypothesis that pulse-wave analysis (PWA) combined with provocative pharmacological testing might provide an alternative method. Radial artery waveforms were recorded and augmentation index (AIx) was calculated from derived aortic waveforms. Thirteen subjects received sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG), inhaled albuterol, or placebo. Twelve subjects received NTG, albuterol, and placebo separately during an infusion of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (LNMMA) or norepinephrine. Twenty-seven hypercholesterolemic subjects and 27 controls received NTG followed by albuterol. Endothelial function was assessed by PWA and forearm blood flow in 27 subjects. Albuterol and NTG both significantly and repeatably reduced AIx (P<0.001). Only the response to albuterol was inhibited by LNMMA (-9.8±5.5% vs -4.7±2.7%; P=0.02). Baseline AIx was higher in the hypercholesterolemic subjects, who exhibited a reduced response to albuterol (P=0.02) but not to NTG when compared with matched controls. The responses to albuterol and acetylcholine were correlated (r=0.5, P=0.02). Consistent with an endothelium-dependent effect, the response to albuterol was substantially inhibited by LNMMA. Importantly, the response to albuterol was reduced in subjects with hypercholesterolemia and was correlated to that of intra-arterial acetylcholine. This methodology provides a simple, repeatable, noninvasive means of assessing endothelial function in vivo.


Key Words: hypercholesterolemia • nitric oxide • pulse-wave analysis • augmentation index • endothelial function


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The vascular endothelium releases a number of biologically active mediators, including nitric oxide (NO), that regulate vessel tone and prevent the development of atheroma.1 Endothelial dysfunction is associated with a range of risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including hypercholesterolemia,2,3 and some therapies that improve clinical outcome also reverse endothelial dysfunction.4 Vasomotor responses in the peripheral and coronary circulations are correlated,5 and coronary endothelial dysfunction is associated with cardiovascular risk.6 However, no direct link between improved endothelial function and reduced risk has been made, and the prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction has not been assessed in a major observational study.

Established methods for assessing vasomotor endothelial function center on measuring the response to an endothelium-dependent, NO-mediated stimulus such as acetylcholine (Ach)2,3 or reactive hyperemia, and a direct (endothelium-independent) nitrovasodilator, like sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or nitroglycerin (NTG). However, current methods are not suitable for inclusion in large-scale trials. Therefore, new and relatively simple, noninvasive techniques are required to assess the predictive value of endothelial dysfunction.7

Arterial stiffness depends, in part, on smooth muscle tone.8 The shape of the arterial pressure waveform provides a measure of systemic arterial stiffness9 and can be assessed noninvasively by using the technique of pulse-wave analysis (PWA).10 We hypothesized that PWA might provide a simple method for assessing endothelial vasomotor function. Chowienczyk et al11 demonstrated that albuterol, a ß2-agonist, in part reduces wave reflection by activation of the L-arginine-NO pathway and suggested that such methodology might be applied to the assessment of endothelial function. The aim of this series of experiments was to provide robust validation of the noninvasive assessment of endothelial function by PWA combined with provocative administration of NTG and albuterol. In particular, we wanted to define the repeatability of the responses to albuterol and NTG; to determine whether albuterol acts via the L-arginine-NO pathway; to apply the technique to a large cohort of healthy controls and hypercholesterolemic subjects, the latter of whom are known to exhibit endothelial dysfunction2; and then to compare the technique with the "gold standard" of forearm venous occlusion plethysmography.3


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
All studies were conducted at the Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Edinburgh; the Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, and the Wales Heart Research Institute, University of Wales, Cardiff. Healthy subjects were enrolled from community databases of volunteers, and patients were recruited from cardiovascular risk clinics and family practices local to all institutions. Approval for all studies was obtained from the respective local research ethics committees, and informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Hemodynamics
Blood pressure was recorded in duplicate in the dominant arm by using a validated oscillometric technique (HEM-705CP, Omron Corp). Cardiac index (CI) was assessed noninvasively by using a validated12 transthoracic electrical bioimpedance technique (BoMed NCCOM3-R7), and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated as mean arterial pressure (MAP) divided by CI.

Radial artery waveforms were recorded with a high-fidelity micromanometer (SPC-301, Millar Instruments) from the wrist of the dominant arm. PWA (SCOR 6.1, PWV) was then used to generate a corresponding central waveform by using a validated transfer function,1315 as previously described.16 From this, augmentation index (AIx) and heart rate were determined by using the integral software. AIx, a measure of systemic arterial stiffness,9 was calculated as the difference between the second and first systolic peaks, expressed as a percentage of the pulse pressure.

Venous Occlusion Plethysmography
The brachial artery of the nondominant arm was cannulated with a 27-gauge steel needle (Coopers Needle Works) under local anesthesia, and blood flow was measured simultaneously in both arms by venous occlusion plethysmography, with temperature-compensated, indium/gallium-in-silicone elastomer strain gauges, as previously described.17 Blood flows were recorded during the final 3 minutes of each infusion period, and the mean of the final 5 measurements was used for analysis.

Plasma Albuterol Assay
Venous blood (10 mL) was taken from the antecubital fossa into lithium-heparin tubes and centrifuged immediately at 4°C (2000g for 10 minutes). The plasma was then removed and stored at -80°C for later analysis by a chiral liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry technique.18 The lower limit of detection for the assay was 0.05 ng · mL-1, and the coefficient of variation was <10%.

Drugs
Albuterol (Allen and Hanbury’s) was given by inhalation with a spacer device (2x 200 µg). A 500-µg tablet of NTG (Cox) was placed under the tongue for 3 minutes and then removed. Norepinephrine (NE, Abbott Laboratories) and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (LNMMA, Clinalfa) were prepared aseptically with 0.9% saline as a diluent and infused intravenously at 1 mL · min-1. LNMMA was given as a bolus of 3 mg · kg-1 (5 minutes) and then continuously at 3 mg · kg-1 · h-1 for 45 min. NE was infused at 50 ng · kg-1 · h-1 for 45 min as a control constrictor; the dose was chosen from pilot studies and published literature to produce an elevation of MAP and AIx similar to that effected by LNMMA.19,20 SNP (David Bull Laboratories) at 3 and 10 µg · min-1 and ACh (Novartis) at 7.5 and 15 µg · min-1 were infused intra-arterially, each for 6 minutes.

Protocol
Subjects were studied in the morning after an overnight fast. Subjects with an elevated blood pressure at screening (>160/100 mm Hg), diabetes mellitus, or a clinical history of cardiovascular disease were excluded, as were individuals receiving medication. Studies were conducted in a double-blind fashion (where appropriate) in a quiet, temperature-controlled room (22±2°C). All hemodynamic recordings were made in duplicate. Three sets of recordings were made during a 45-minute period of supine rest, and the last was taken as a baseline. Recordings were made 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after NTG administration and 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after albuterol or aerosol placebo. Pilot studies had confirmed that 20 minutes was sufficient for the hemodynamic changes after NTG to return to baseline but that a longer period was required for albuterol. Therefore, NTG was always administered first, followed by albuterol 25 minutes later.

Study 1: Repeatability
Thirteen healthy subjects (11 male) were studied on 3 occasions, separated by 1 week. After baseline recordings of heart rate, blood pressure, CI, and radial artery waveforms were made, subjects received sublingual NTG. This was followed by albuterol (on 2 occasions) or matching placebo (once) in random order. Blood was taken for estimation of plasma albuterol at baseline and at 5-minute intervals thereafter.

Study 2: Inhibition of NO Synthase
Twelve healthy males were studied on 6 occasions, separated by 1 week. An 18-gauge cannula was sited in the nondominant arm and saline infused for 30 minutes. After baseline recordings of heart rate, blood pressure, CI, and radial artery waveforms were made, LNMMA was then infused for 15 minutes alone, on 3 occasions, followed by administration of NTG, albuterol, or matching aerosol placebo. On the other 3 visits, NE was infused in place of LNMMA. The order of administration of all drugs was fully randomized.

Study 3: Hypercholesterolemia
Twenty-seven hypercholesterolemic subjects (total cholesterol >6.0 mmol · L-1) and 27 matched normocholesterolemics (<6.0 mmol · L-1) were studied. Heart rate, blood pressure, and radial artery waveforms were assessed at baseline and after NTG and albuterol administration. Twenty minutes after albuterol was given, blood was taken for determination of cholesterol (total, LDL, and HDL), glucose, and albuterol concentrations.

Study 4: Comparison With Venous Occlusion Plethysmography
Twenty-seven subjects with a range of serum cholesterol values (3 to 8.6 mmol · L-1; 12 subjects >6.0) but no other cardiovascular risk factors were studied on a single occasion. Endothelial function was first assessed invasively by venous occlusion plethysmography coupled with an intra-arterial infusion of SNP and ACh (after 30 minutes of saline infusion and a 20-minute washout between drugs). After a further 30 minutes, endothelial function was then assessed by PWA coupled with administration of NTG and albuterol.

Data Analysis
The response to albuterol, placebo, or NTG was defined as the maximum change in each parameter after drug administration (an a priori summary measure). Forearm blood flow was calculated as mL · min-1 · 100 mL-1 tissue, and the ratio of blood flow in the infused to the noninfused arm was used to reduce blood flow variability in response to extraneous stimuli such as temperature fluctuations.21 Again, the maximum responses to albuterol and to ACh were used as a priori summary measures. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 9.0) and unpaired or paired, 2-tailed Student’s t tests or ANOVA, as appropriate. Multiple regression analysis was conducted by using the "enter method." Repeatability was assessed by constructing Bland-Altman plots and reported as the mean±SD of the differences between samples.22 All values represent mean±SD, and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. All changes cited represent absolute differences, rather than percentage changes.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study 1
The mean age of the subjects was 37 years (range, 25 to 56). There were no significant differences in baseline values between the 3 visits. The hemodynamic changes are shown in Table 1. Only AIx (P<0.001) and CI (P=0.01) changed significantly after albuterol. There was no difference in the mean response to albuterol compared with NTG for any parameter except CI (P=0.02). The response to albuterol or NTG did not differ between visits. The mean difference in the AIx response between visits was -2.3±3.0% and -0.2±6.5% for albuterol and NTG, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Hemodynamic Changes in Study 1

Plasma albuterol was below the level of detection at baseline and after administration of placebo. Plasma albuterol increased after administration of the active drug (P<0.001 on both occasions, Figure 1), and there was no difference in the peak albuterol concentration between visits (mean difference of -0.12±0.55 ng · mL-1, P=0.9).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Changes in plasma albuterol concentration after visits 1 ({circ}) and 2 ({square}); n=13.

Study 2
The mean age of the subjects was 32 years (range, 22 to 52). There were no significant differences in baseline values across the 6 visits. Hemodynamic changes are summarized in Table 2. The effects of NE and LNMMA did not differ significantly between visits. Both drugs had similar effects on AIx, MAP, and heart rate, but there was a greater change in CI (P<0.001) and PVR (P<0.001) with LNMMA. The responses to NTG and placebo with LNMMA did not differ significantly from those during coinfusion of NE. However, albuterol had less effect on AIx during infusion of LNMMA (P=0.02, Figure 2A), despite causing a greater reduction in MAP (P<0.001) and PVR (P<0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Hemodynamic Changes in Study 2



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Effect of inhibition of NO synthase on the response to NTG, albuterol, and placebo. Changes in AIx after albuterol, NTG, and placebo during infusion of NE ({blacksquare}) and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (•); n=12, *P<0.05. B, Relationship between the response to albuterol and ACh. Change in AIx after albuterol and change in forearm blood flow (FBF) after ACh. A regression line is shown, for which r=0.5, P=0.02, slope=-9.8, n=27.

Study 3
The baseline characteristics of the subjects are given in Table 3. There was no significant change in MAP or heart rate after NTG or albuterol in either group. AIx fell significantly after administration of albuterol, but the response was significantly reduced in hypercholesterolemics compared with controls (-7.4±5.7% vs -11.9±7.7%, respectively; P=0.02). Despite this disparity, the time to maximum change (12±3 vs 11±3 minutes, P=0.2) and peak plasma albuterol concentrations (1.2±0.6 vs 1.1±0.5 ng · mL-1, P=0.5) were similar in both groups. Moreover, the maximum change in AIx after NTG (-14.8±8.4% vs -10.2±9.0%, P=0.1) did not differ significantly.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Subject Characteristics in Study 3

To investigate further the factors influencing the response to albuterol, a multiple linear regression model was constructed, with change in AIx as the dependent variable. Age, sex, weight, smoking status, baseline MAP and AIx, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and change in MAP and heart rate were entered into the model. Variables with a significance >0.25 were then removed and the analysis repeated. The final model (Table 4) explained {approx}60% of the variability in the response to albuterol. Change in AIx was negatively associated with plasma LDL and glucose and positively correlated with plasma albuterol concentration and fall in heart rate.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Results of the Regression Analysis for Study 3, With Change in AIx After Albuterol as the Dependent Variable

Study 4
Resting forearm blood flow did not differ between the 2 arms, and there was no change in blood flow in the noninfused arm during the study (data not shown). As expected, blood flow increased significantly during infusion of SNP and ACh (P<0.001 for both, ANOVA). However, the response to ACh (7.5 µg · min-1: 1.6±1.0 vs 3.4±1.0 mL · min-1 · 100 mL-1, P=0.003; and 15.0 µg · min-1: 2.0±0.3 vs 5.8±0.3 mL · min-1 · 100 mL-1, P=0.04) but not to SNP was reduced in subjects with a cholesterol level >6.0 mmol · L-1. NTG and albuterol both significantly reduced AIx (P<0.001), and the response to albuterol (r=0.5, P=0.02) was related to serum cholesterol. There was a significant, linear relationship between the absolute change in AIx after albuterol and the change in the forearm blood flow ratio during infusion of ACh at 15 µg · min-1 (Figure 2B). There was no relationship between the response to SNP and to NTG.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study describes the effects of albuterol and NTG on the aortic pressure waveform. AIx, a quantitative index of systemic arterial stiffness,9 was calculated from aortic waveforms generated by PWA.10 Our main novel findings are that albuterol and NTG produce qualitatively and quantitatively similar and repeatable effects on AIx, that the effect of albuterol but not of NTG is inhibited by LNMMA and reduced in hypercholesterolemic subjects, and that the response to albuterol is correlated with the effect of ACh in the forearm vascular bed. These data indicate that the effect of albuterol is, in part, NO and endothelium dependent and are constistent with the presence of endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Moreover, they suggest that PWA and administration of albuterol and NTG provide a simple, reliable, noninvasive method for assessing endothelial function, as we and others have previously hypothesized.23,24

As expected, inhalation of albuterol at the dose used reduced AIx without any accompanying alteration in heart rate or MAP, compared with placebo, which is important because AIx is influenced by both.20,25 The magnitude of the response to both drugs was comparable, and the repeatability, high. Indeed, the repeatability is similar to what we previously reported for PWA16 and to values quoted for other techniques of assessing endothelial function, such as intra-arterial infusion of ACh26 and flow-mediated dilatation.27

Previous studies have shown similar changes in the arterial pressure waveform after NTG,28,29 but the effect of endothelium-dependent NO dilators has not been reported. Nevertheless, comparable changes in the volume waveform after infusion of ACh into rabbits30 and of NTG and albuterol into humans11 have been described. However, unlike Chowienczyk et al11 and relevant to wider application of the present technique, we included a suitable placebo and showed that the responses to albuterol and NTG are repeatable. We also measured plasma albuterol concentrations, which were relatively stable between 5 and 20 minutes (Figure 1). This pharmacokinetic profile is in keeping with the pharmacodynamic response to albuterol. Peak plasma levels did not differ significantly between visits, confirming that inhalation of albuterol with a spacer device provides a repeatable method of drug delivery. As might be expected, the results of the multiple regression analysis from study 3 (Table 4) demonstrated a significant relationship between plasma albuterol and the maximum change in AIx. Therefore, some of the variability in the response to albuterol between subjects may have been due to differences in drug absorption and peak plasma concentrations. Such an effect may be important when making comparisons between subjects groups, especially when relatively small numbers of subjects are studied or smokers are included, when plasma albuterol values may improve the reliability of data interpretation.

To investigate the NO dependence of albuterol, we infused LNMMA, a specific substrate-analogue inhibitor of NO synthase. However, because systemic LNMMA infusion alters MAP and heart rate,19 we used NE as a control vasoconstrictor to produce comparable hemodynamic changes.20 As expected, but not previously reported, we observed a significant increase in AIx with administration of LNMMA. However, both drugs had similar effects on AIx, heart rate, and MAP, but the response to albuterol was significantly attenuated by LNMMA, despite a greater reduction in MAP and PVR. Moreover, the responses to NTG and placebo were not affected by LNMMA. This indicates that NO mediates a significant part of the response to inhaled albuterol. Furthermore, the degree of inhibition produced by LNMMA, {approx}50%, is consistent with data from the forearm vascular bed31 and systemic studies on the volume waveform.11 However, in the present study, we included a suitable placebo aerosol and control vasoconstrictor to investigate the potential confounding effect of baseline changes in heart rate, MAP, and AIx after LNMMA.

Hypercholesterolemia is the condition most consistently associated with endothelial dysfunction.2,3,32 Therefore, we investigated the response to albuterol and NTG in a group of 27 hypercholesterolemics and matched controls and, in a separate cohort, compared endothelial function as assessed by PWA with that measured by intra-arterial infusion of ACh and SNP in the forearm. Baseline AIx was significantly higher in the hypercholesterolemic subjects, indicating increased arterial stiffness. This is the first time that increased aortic AIx has been reported in hypercholesterolemics, but increased stiffness has been previously demonstrated by several other techniques,33,34 although this is not a universal finding.35 However, the higher AIx may have been due to the slightly higher MAP20 in the hypercholesterolemics, arterial stiffening per se, or a combination of both.34,36 AIx fell less after albuterol in the hypercholesterolemics than in controls, despite their being well matched. Moreover, mean plasma albuterol concentration was similar in both groups, as were the effects of albuterol and NTG on other hemodynamic variables, suggesting blunting of a direct effect of albuterol on AIx in the hypercholesterolemic subjects, rather than, for example, an indirect mechanism through changes in heart rate or MAP. Moreover, in the multiple regression model, which included known and potential confounding variables, LDL cholesterol was inversely and independently correlated with the change in AIx. Interestingly, although endothelial function declines with age, we were unable to show any relationship between age and the albuterol response in our multiple regression model. However, this is likely due to the relatively narrow age range of the study subjects and the small sample size.

The inverse association between the response to albuterol and plasma glucose is of considerable interest. Endothelial dysfunction is associated with type 137 and type 2 diabetes38 and with acute hyperglycemia in normal subjects.39 However, any relationship between insulin sensitivity and endothelial function in nondiabetic subjects is controversial.40,41 Moreover, data concerning cardiovascular risk and plasma glucose in normal subjects are divided.42 Nevertheless, glycosylated hemoglobin is positively associated with the risk of future coronary heart disease risk in a linear, stepwise manner,43 suggesting a continuum of risk across the glycemic range, which may be explained by the inverse relationship between endothelial function and plasma glucose in the present study.

To compare our novel methodology for noninvasive assessment of endothelial function with a more established one, we assessed endothelial function by both PWA and forearm blood flow in 27 individuals with a wide range of serum cholesterol values. As previously noted,3 we observed a significant blunting of the vasodilator effect of ACh, but not of SNP, in subjects with a serum cholesterol value >6 mmol · L-1. Moreover, as in study 3, the response to albuterol but not to NTG was related to serum cholesterol. The main novel finding, however, was that there was a significant and linear correlation between the effect of albuterol on AIx and of ACh on forearm blood flow (Figure 2). This suggests that differences in the response to albuterol are likely to be caused by differences in endothelial function and that PWA provides a reasonable means of assessing endothelial function noninvasively. Although the correlation between the 2 methods in the present study was not absolute, the strength of the relationship is greater than that reported previously when endothelial function was compared in different vascular beds.5 Thus, PWA may be suitable for use in large studies investigating the predictive value of endothelial function.

Based on our previous data,20,25 it is unlikely that the small alterations in MAP and heart rate observed in the present study could account for the effect of the 2 drugs on AIx. Moreover, in study 2 the changes in MAP and heart rate with albuterol were greater during infusion of NE, which would tend to reduce the observed difference between LNMMA and NE. Furthermore, in study 3 the changes in MAP and heart rate were similar between the 2 groups. Therefore, it seems likely that NTG and albuterol altered the waveform, in part by a direct effect of NO on large-artery mechanics.

In summary, albuterol and NTG produce repeatable changes in the arterial waveform. The response to albuterol but not to NTG can be substantially inhibited by LNMMA, indicating that albuterol reduces AIx in part through generation of NO. Therefore, albuterol can be considered an endothelium-dependent, NO-mediated vasodilator and NTG, endothelium independent. Moreover, hypercholesterolemics exhibit a reduced response to albuterol but not to NTG, consistent with the presence of endothelial dysfunction. Finally, the response to albuterol was correlated with the reponse to ACh in the forearm, suggesting that there is good agreement between the 2 methods of assessing endothelial function. These data support the view that PWA coupled with administration of albuterol and NTG provides a simple, noninvasive, repeatable method for assessing endothelial function. We believe that this technique provides a suitable means for assessing endothelial function in large numbers of patients and thus, answers the important question of the predictive value of endothelial function. PWA has already been included in substudies of the ASCOT, SEARCH, and FIELD investigations. This will address the importance of stiffness as a predictor of risk, but we now need to include the noninvasive assessment of endothelial function by PWA in such studies.


*    Acknowledgments
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowReferences
 
This study was partly funded by the British Heart Foundation, the High Blood Pressure Foundation and a local research and development grant (Lothian Universities NHS Hospital Trust). Professor D.J. Webb is currently in receipt of a Research Leave Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust (052633). We would like to thank Sian Tyrrell, Simon Johnston, Philip Storey, and Jenny Smith for assistance with data collection and Dr S. Pleasance for his kind assistance with the albuterol assays.

Received September 5, 2001; accepted October 29, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Cooke JP, Dzau VJ. Nitric oxide synthase: role in the genesis of vascular disease. Annu Rev Med. 1997; 48: 489–509.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Creager MA, Cooke JP, Mendelsohn ME, Gallagher SJ, Coleman SM, Loscalzo J, Dzau VJ. Impaired vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemic humans. J Clin Invest. 1990; 86: 228–234.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Chowienczyk PJ, Watts GF, Cockcroft JR, Ritter JM. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolaemia. Lancet. 1992; 340: 1430–1432.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. O’Driscoll G, Green D, Taylor RR. Simvastatin, an HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, improves endothelial function within 1 month. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1126–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Anderson TJ, Uehata A, Gerhard MD, Meredith IT, Knab S, Delagrange D, Liberman EH, Ganz P, Creager MA, Yeung AC, Selwyn AP. Close relationship of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 1235–1241.[Abstract]

6. Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000; 101: 948–954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Luscher TF. The endothelium and cardiovascular disease: a complex relation. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 1081–1083.[Free Full Text]

8. Ramsey MW, Goodfellow J, Jones CJH, Luddington LA, Lewis MJ, Henderson AH. Endothelial control of arterial distensibility is impaired in chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1995; 92: 3212–3219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Safar ME, London GM. Therapeutic studies and arterial stiffness in hypertension: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension, the Clinical Committee of Arterial Structure and Function, Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 1527–1535.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. O’Rourke MF, Gallagher DE. Pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens. 1996; 14: 147–157.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Chowienczyk PJ, Kelly RP, MacCallum H, Millasseau SC, Anderson TLG, Gosling RG, Ritter JM, Anggard EE. Photoplethysmographic assessment of pulse wave reflection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 2007–2014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Northridge DB, Findlay IN, Wilson J, Henderson E, Dargie HJ. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance. Br Heart J. 1990; 63: 93–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Karamanoglu M, O’Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Kelly RP. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur Heart J. 1993; 14: 160–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Takazawa K, O’Rourke M, Fujita M. Estimation of ascending aortic pressure from radial arterial pressure using a generalized transfer function. Z Kardiol. 1996; 85: 137–139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Segers P, Qasem A, DeBacker T, Carlier S, Verdonck P, Avolio A. Peripheral ‘oscillatory’ compliance is associated with aortic augmentation index. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1434–1439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Wilkinson IB, Fuchs SA, Jansen IM, Spratt JC, Murray GD, Cockcroft JR, Webb DJ. The reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 2079–2084.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Haynes WG, Strachan FE, Webb DJ. Endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors cause vasoconstriction of human resistance and capacitance vessels in vivo. Circulation. 1995; 92: 357–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Joyce KB, Jones AE, Scott RJ, Biddlecombe RA, Pleasance S. Determination of the enantiomers of salbutamol and its 4-O-sulphate metabolites in biological matrices by chiral liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1998; 12: 1899–1910.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Haynes WG, Noon JP, Walker BR, Webb DJ. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis increases blood pressure in healthy humans. J Hypertens. 1993; 11: 1375–1380.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Hupperetz PC, Van Thoor CJ, Cockcroft JR, Webb DJ. Changes in the derived central pressure waveform and pulse pressure in response to angiotensin II and noradrenaline in man. J Physiol. 2001; 530: 541–550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Chin-Dusting JP, Cameron JD, Dart AM, Jennings GL. Human forearm venous occlusion plethysmography: methodology, presentation and analysis. Clin Sci. 1999; 96: 439–440.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307–310.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Cockcroft JR. Third European Meeting on Pulse Wave Analysis and Large-Artery Function: clinical applications of pulse wave analysis. J Hum Hypertens. 2001; 15: 818.Abstract.

24. Hayward CS, Webb CM, Collins P. Assessment of endothelial function using peripheral pressure waveform analysis. Circulation. 2000; 102 (suppl II): II-172.Abstract 830.

25. Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Flint L, Cockcroft JR, Newby DE, Webb DJ. The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans. J Physiol. 2000; 525: 263–270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Petrie JR, Ueda S, Morris AD, Murray LS, Elliott HL, Connell JMC. How reproducible is bilateral forearm plethysmography? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 45: 131–139.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Hardie KL, Kinlay S, Hardy DB, Wlodarczyk J, Silberberg JS, Fletcher PJ. Reproducibility of brachial ultrasonography and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) for assessing endothelial function. AustN Z J Med. 1997; 27: 649–652.

28. Murrell W. Nitroglycerine as a remedy for angina pectoris. Lancet. 1879; 80: 80–81.

29. Kelly RP, Gibbs HH, O’Rourke MF, Daley JE, Mang K, Morgan JJ, Avolio AP. Nitroglycerine has more favourable effects on left ventricular afterload than apparent from measurement of pressure in a peripheral artery. Eur Heart J. 1990; 11: 138–144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Weinberg PD, Habens F, Kengatharan M, Barnes SE, Matz J, Anggard EE, Carrier MJ. Characteristics of the pulse waveform during altered nitric oxide synthesis in the rabbit. Br J Pharmacol. 2001; 133: 361–370.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Dawes M, Chowienczyk PJ, Ritter JM. Effects of inhibition of the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway on vasodilation caused by ß-adrenergic agonists in human forearm. Circulation. 1997; 95: 2293–2297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Vita JA, Treasure CB, Nabel EG, McLenachan JM, Fish RD, Yeung AC, Vekshtein VI, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Coronary vasomotor response to acetylcholine relates to risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1990; 81: 491–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Dart AM, Lancombe F, Yeoh JK, Cameron JD, Jennings GL, Laufer E, Esmore DS. Aortic distensibility in patients with isolated hypercholesterolaemia, coronary artery disease, or cardiac transplantation. Lancet. 1991; 338: 270–273.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Toikka JO, Niemi P, Ahotupa M, Niinikoski H, Viikari JSA, Ronnemaa T, Hartiala JJ, Raitakari OT. Large-artery elastic properties in young men: relationships to serum lipoproteins and oxidized low-density lipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 436–441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Lehmann ED, Watts GF, Fatemi-Langroudi B, Gosling RG. Aortic compliance in young patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Clin Sci. 1992; 83: 717–721.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Cameron JD, Jennings GL, Dart AM. The relationship between arterial compliance, age, blood pressure and serum lipid levels. J Hypertens. 1995; 13: 1718–1723.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Calver A, Collier J, Vallance P. Inhibition and stimulation of nitric oxide synthesis in the human forearm arterial bed of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90: 2548–2554.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. McVeigh GE, Brennan G, Johnston D. Dietary fish oil augments nitric oxide production or release in patients with type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1993; 36: 33–38.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Williams SB, Goldfine AB, Timimi FK, Ting HH, Roddy MA, Simonson DC, Creager MA. Acute hyperglycemia attenuates endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans in vivo. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1695–1701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Petrie JR, Ueda S, Webb DJ, Elliott HL, Connell JMC. Endothelial nitric oxide production and insulin sensitivity: a physiological link with implications for pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1331–1333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Utriainen T, Makimattila S, Virkamaki A, Bergholm R, Yki-Jarvinen H. Dissociation between insulin sensitivity of glucose uptake and endothelial function in normal subjects. Diabetologia. 1996; 39: 1477–1482.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Barrett-Connor E. Does hyperglycemia really cause coronary heart disease? Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 1620–1623.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Khaw K-T, Wareham N, Luben R, Bingham S, Oakes S, Welch A, Day N. Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of European prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk). BMJ. 2001; 322: 1–6.[Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. A. Crilly, V. Kumar, H. J. Clark, N. W. Scott, A. G. MacDonald, and D. J. Williams
Arterial stiffness and cumulative inflammatory burden in rheumatoid arthritis: a dose-response relationship independent of established cardiovascular risk factors
Rheumatology, October 25, 2009; (2009) kep305v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. P. L. Rice, N. Agarwal, H. Bolusani, R. Newcombe, M. F. Scanlon, M. Ludgate, and D. A. Rees
Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone Replacement on Vascular Function in Primary and Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency: A Randomized Crossover Trial
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1966 - 1972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. Kohler and J. R. Stradling
Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic OSA
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2009; 179(10): 969 - 970.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
M. E. O'Donnell, S. A. Badger, M. A. Sharif, R. R. Makar, I. S. Young, B. Lee, and C.V. Soong
The Vascular and Biochemical Effects of Cilostazol in Diabetic Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, April 1, 2009; 43(2): 132 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
B. Ilyas, N. Dhaun, D. Markie, P. Stansell, J. Goddard, D.E. Newby, and D.J. Webb
Renal function is associated with arterial stiffness and predicts outcome in patients with coronary artery disease
QJM, March 1, 2009; 102(3): 183 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. Kohler, S. Craig, D. Nicoll, P. Leeson, R. J. O. Davies, and J. R. Stradling
Endothelial Function and Arterial Stiffness in Minimally Symptomatic Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2008; 178(9): 984 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
N L Mills, J J Miller, A Anand, S D Robinson, G A Frazer, D Anderson, L Breen, I B Wilkinson, C M McEniery, K Donaldson, et al.
Increased arterial stiffness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mechanism for increased cardiovascular risk
Thorax, April 1, 2008; 63(4): 306 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. E. Sharman, C. M. McEniery, R. Campbell, P. Pusalkar, I. B. Wilkinson, J. S. Coombes, and J. R. Cockcroft
Nitric Oxide Does Not Significantly Contribute to Changes in Pulse Pressure Amplification During Light Aerobic Exercise
Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 856 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Frimodt-Moller, A. H. Nielsen, A.-L. Kamper, and S. Strandgaard
Reproducibility of pulse-wave analysis and pulse-wave velocity determination in chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 594 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Munir, A. Guilcher, T. Kamalesh, B. Clapp, S. Redwood, M. Marber, and P. Chowienczyk
Peripheral Augmentation Index Defines the Relationship Between Central and Peripheral Pulse Pressure
Hypertension, January 1, 2008; 51(1): 112 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
M. Crilly, C. Coch, M. Bruce, H. Clark, and D. Williams
Indices of cardiovascular function derived from peripheral pulse wave analysis using radial applanation tonometry: a measurement repeatability study
Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2007; 12(3): 189 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Barac, U. Campia, and J. A. Panza
Methods for Evaluating Endothelial Function in Humans
Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): 748 - 760.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. E. Deanfield, J. P. Halcox, and T. J. Rabelink
Endothelial Function and Dysfunction: Testing and Clinical Relevance
Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1285 - 1295.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Donald, M. Charakida, T. J. Cole, P. Friberg, P. J. Chowienczyk, S. C. Millasseau, J. E. Deanfield, and J. P. Halcox
Non-Invasive Assessment of Endothelial Function: Which Technique?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1846 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. M. McEniery, S. Wallace, I. S. Mackenzie, B. McDonnell, Yasmin, D. E. Newby, J. R. Cockcroft, and I. B. Wilkinson
Endothelial Function Is Associated With Pulse Pressure, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Augmentation Index in Healthy Humans
Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 602 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. Verdecchia, F. Angeli, and S. Taddei
At the Beginning of Stiffening: Endothelial Dysfunction Meets "Pulsology"
Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 541 - 542.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H. Sourij, R. Zweiker, and T. C. Wascher
Effects of Pioglitazone on Endothelial Function, Insulin Sensitivity, and Glucose Control in Subjects With Coronary Artery Disease and New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 1039 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. K. Naka, A. C. Tweddel, S. N. Doshi, J. Goodfellow, and A. H. Henderson
Flow-mediated changes in pulse wave velocity: a new clinical measure of endothelial function
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2006; 27(3): 302 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. Weber, J. Auer, M. F. O'Rourke, E. Kvas, E. Lassnig, G. Lamm, N. Stark, M. Rammer, and B. Eber
Increased arterial wave reflections predict severe cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2005; 26(24): 2657 - 2663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
N. Nair, R. K Oka, L. D Waring, E. M Umoh, C B. Taylor, and J. P Cooke
Vascular compliance versus flow-mediated vasodilation: correlation with cardiovascular risk factors
Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2005; 10(4): 275 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
L. Kalra, C. Rambaran, P. Chowienczyk, D. Goss, I. Hambleton, J. Ritter, A. Shah, R. Wilks, and T. Forrester
Ethnic Differences in Arterial Responses and Inflammatory Markers in Afro-Caribbean and Caucasian Subjects
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2005; 25(11): 2362 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
L. Lind, N. Fors, J. Hall, K. Marttala, and A. Stenborg
A Comparison of Three Different Methods to Evaluate Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in the Elderly: The Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) Study
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2005; 25(11): 2368 - 2375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
F. Verbeke, P. Segers, S. Heireman, R. Vanholder, P. Verdonck, and L. M. Van Bortel
Noninvasive Assessment of Local Pulse Pressure: Importance of Brachial-to-Radial Pressure Amplification
Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 244 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
J. Swampillai, S. Doshi, A. G Fraser, J. Goodfellow, and C. J. Jones
Review: Clinical assessment of endothelial function -- an update
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, March 1, 2005; 5(2): 72 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. S. Stokes, A. J Bune, N. Huon, and E. S. Barin
Long-Term Effectiveness of Extended-Release Nitrate for the Treatment of Systolic Hypertension
Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): 380 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron
Use of Arterial Transfer Functions for the Derivation of Central Aortic Waveform Characteristics in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Response to Wilkinson and McEniery and Avolio, Cockcroft, and O'Rourke
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2004; 27(10): 2565 - 2567.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. F. O'Rourke and W. W. Nichols
Shear Stress and Flow-Mediated Dilation
Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 119 - 120.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
I. B. Wilkinson, S. S. Franklin, and J. R. Cockcroft
Nitric Oxide and the Regulation of Large Artery Stiffness: From Physiology to Pharmacology
Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 112 - 116.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Covic, D. J. A. Goldsmith, P. Gusbeth-Tatomir, and M. Covic
Haemodialysis acutely improves endothelium-independent vasomotor function without significantly influencing the endothelium-mediated abnormal response to a {beta}2-agonist
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 637 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
K. Mather and R. Lewanczuk
Measurement of Arterial Stiffness in Diabetes: A cautionary tale
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2004; 27(3): 831 - 833.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
D. K. Plante and J. L. Nadler
Diabetes and Vascular Disease
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2003; 7(3): 295 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. J. Oliver and D. J. Webb
Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Atherosclerotic Events
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2003; 23(4): 554 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. S. Stokes, E. S. Barin, and K. L. Gilfillan
Effects of Isosorbide Mononitrate and AII Inhibition on Pulse Wave Reflection in Hypertension
Hypertension, February 1, 2003; 41(2): 297 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. L.M. Cruden, D. E. Newby, D. J. Webb, P. Bartsch, H. Mairbaurl, B. Basnyat, P. Prodhan, N. N. Noviski, T. B. Kinane, E. R. Swenson, et al.
Salmeterol for the Prevention of High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema
N. Engl. J. Med., October 17, 2002; 347(16): 1282 - 1285.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, I. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cockcroft, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, I. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cockcroft, J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis
Right arrow Risk Factors for Stroke
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism