Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Human Muscle Metabolism Research Group (C.K., A.E.H.), Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, and the Oxford Lipid Metabolism Group (F.K., S.M.H., K.N.F.), Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
Reprint requests to Prof Adrianne E. Hardman, Human Muscle Metabolism Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Sports Science and Recreation Management, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK. E-mail a.e.hardman{at}lboro.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: exercise dietary carbohydrate lipoproteins triglycerides women
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Current dietary guidelines for reducing the risk of CHD emphasize the replacement of saturated fat with complex carbohydrates so that total fat intake does not exceed 30% of energy intake.8 Low-fat high-carbohydrate diets effectively reduce LDL cholesterol8 but, in the absence of weight loss, can also increase fasting9 and postprandial10 plasma TG concentrations as well as RLP cholesterol.11 As explained above, this effect on TRL metabolism may reduce the overall benefit expected from such diets. For these and related reasons, there is currently a debate concerning the effectiveness of high-carbohydrate diets as a means for reducing CHD risk.
However, this debate has largely ignored the potential of exercise to offset these effects. Exercise conditioning is known to decrease fasting TG12,13 and postprandial TRL concentrations14 when subjects are on a Western diet. Therefore, the simultaneous adoption of a high-carbohydrate diet and a physically active lifestyle may optimize the lipoprotein profile, particularly in individuals who are susceptible to carbohydrate-induced hypertriglyceridemia.
The purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that daily aerobic exercise of moderate intensity opposes the potentially detrimental effects on TRL metabolism of changing to a low-fat high-carbohydrate diet. We used a short-term intervention specifically to examine the influence of exercise on TRL metabolism during the initial period of dietary change, when lipoproteinemic changes are particularly marked.15
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2 max), predicted from the
O2/heart rate relationship during uphill treadmill walking, was 29±2 mL/kg per minute. Plasma concentrations of TGs and total and HDL cholesterol, measured after an overnight fast on recruitment, were 1.11±0.31, 6.50±0.46, and 1.69±0.29 mmol/L, respectively. Two subjects were taking hormone replacement therapy and maintained this therapy during the study. Other than this, no subject was taking drugs known to influence lipid or carbohydrate metabolism.
Design
Subjects consumed a standard high-fat mixed meal after 3 different interventions: (1) 3 days on a low-carbohydrate (low-CHO) diet, (2) 3 days on a high-carbohydrate (high-CHO) diet, and (3) 3 days on the same high-CHO diet with one 60-minute session of brisk walking daily (high-CHO-Ex diet). The order of the interventions was counterbalanced, with 10-day washout periods, during which the subjects resumed their usual physical activity and dietary habits. During the day preceding each intervention, the diet was standardized, and subjects refrained from exercise and from alcohol consumption. No alcohol was consumed during any of the intervention periods.
Experimental Diets and Exercise Sessions
The experimental diets were based on normal foods. Their energy and macronutrient contents are shown in Table 1. The energy values matched, on an individual basis, each subjects habitual energy intake. All food items were provided for the subjects, who prepared 3 meals and 1 snack each day by following a prescribed menu and weighing each item. Both diets were well tolerated, aside from a common complaint that subjects felt excessively full when consuming the high-CHO diet. Compliance, assessed by food inventories and detailed discussions with subjects, was high; ie, subjects followed the diets "to the gram."
|
During the diet-only interventions, only activities of daily living were permitted. During the high-CHO-Ex intervention, subjects walked on the treadmill at 1.5±0.1 m/s (mean±SD) up a 3±1% gradient for 60 minutes each afternoon.
O2 and carbon dioxide production were measured by using Douglas bag techniques, heart rate was determined by short-range telemetry (SPORT-TESTER, Polar Electro), and ratings of perceived exertion were assessed by use of the Borg scale.16 The average
O2 was 17.7±1.1 mL/kg per minute, which represented 61±3% of predicted
O2 max. Heart rate averaged 128±8 bpm, and ratings of perceived exertion were 12±2 (on a scale from 6 to 20). No subject experienced difficulty completing the walk. Gross energy expenditure per session was 1.46±0.10 MJ. On average, 56±11 g of carbohydrate and 13±3 g of fat were oxidized daily during treadmill walking.
Test Meal Protocol
Subjects arrived at the laboratory at 8:00 AM, after a 12-hour fast. Blood samples were obtained via a venous cannula in the fasted state and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after completion of the test meal and then hourly for 6 hours. The meal contained cereal, coconut, nuts, chocolate, fruit, and whipping cream (per kilogram body mass: 1.0 g fat, 0.9 g carbohydrate, and 0.2 g protein). The subjects rested throughout, consumed only water, and were always supine for at least 15 minutes before blood sampling.
Analytical Methods
One aliquot of plasma was kept on ice overnight before separation of a TRL fraction. To minimize proteolytic degradation of apoB in this aliquot, to each milliliter of plasma 1.0 µL of phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (Sigma Diagnostics) (10 mmol/L, dissolved in iso-propanol) and 5 µL of aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer) (1.4 µg/L) were added. The concentrations of TGs in plasma (samples were stored at -20°C) and the TRL fraction (fresh samples) were measured enzymatically, with correction for free glycerol.17 Plasma samples were also analyzed for total and HDL cholesterol (fasted samples only), and nonesterified fatty acids and glucose by enzymatic colorimetric methods. Aliquots of serum (stored at -70°C) were analyzed for RLP cholesterol (details below), insulin (Coat-a-Count, Diagnostic Products), and 3-hydroxybutyrate (Sigma Diagnostics). Apart from TG analysis in the TRL fraction, all samples from each subject were analyzed in the same batch. The TRL fraction (Sf >20) was separated by slicing the tube after preparative ultracentrifugation in an Optima TLX ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments Ltd) in a fixed angle rotor (TLA 100 · 4, Beckman Instruments Ltd) for 150 minutes at 543 000g at 4°C. ApoB-48 and apoB-100 in the TRL fraction were used as specific markers for the concentration of TRL particles of intestinal and hepatic origin, respectively. They were quantified by using analytical SDS-PAGE.18 ApoE was quantified by using the apoB-100 standard, taking account of the difference in chromogenicity by multiplying by 2.6.19 RLP cholesterol was determined in the fasted state and 4 hours after a meal by using a novel immunoseparation kit technique (Jimro-II) kindly provided by Japanese Immunoresearch Laboratories Co (Takasaki, Japan).3
Calculations and Statistics
Comparisons among interventions were made by using repeated-measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc tests where applicable. One-way ANOVA was used to compare variables measured in the fasted state and summary measures of postprandial responses (total areas under concentration versus time curves [AUCs]). For RLP cholesterol concentrations, intervention and time effects were determined by using 2-way ANOVA. Whenever data were not normally distributed, statistical analyses were performed after logarithmic transformation. The number of TG molecules per apoB-100containing TRL particle in the fasted state was calculated as a measure of VLDL particle size. The number of apoE molecules per apoB-100containing TRL particle in the fasted state was also calculated. For both calculations, fasting TRL concentrations of TGs, apoB-100, and apoE were converted to moles per liter, and the presence of a small number of apoB-48containing TRL particles was disregarded, because these represent a very small proportion of the TRL pool and are relatively TG poor (Sf <400) compared with "normal" chylomicrons.18 Fasting LDL cholesterol concentration was estimated by using the Friedewald formula.20 Statistical analyses were performed by using Statistica for Windows, version 5.0, adopting a 5% level of significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The addition of exercise to the high-CHO diet significantly attenuated the diet-induced increases in plasma TGs, TRL-TGs and concentrations of TRLapoB-48, TRLapoB-100, and TRL-apoE (Table 2) and serum RLP cholesterol concentration (Table 3). Exercise did not reverse the reduction in HDL cholesterol concentration observed with the high-CHO intervention (Table 2).
There were no significant differences between the high-CHO-Ex and the low-CHO interventions in any of the above parameters except HDL cholesterol, which was significantly lower after the high-CHO-Ex intervention (Table 2).
Fasting plasma nonesterified fatty acid concentrations were not different among interventions (data not shown), but the 3-hydroxybutyrate concentration was somewhat lower after the high-CHO intervention than after the low-CHO intervention (P<0.07, Table 2). Serum insulin was lower after the high-CHO-Ex intervention than after the high-CHO intervention (Table 2).
Postprandial Responses
Plasma and TRL-TG concentrations after the high-fat mixed meal are shown in Figure 1. The AUCs for postprandial plasma TGs and TRL-TGs were greater (36% and 32%, respectively) after the high-CHO intervention than after the low-CHO intervention (Table 4). However, the addition of daily exercise to the high-CHO diet significantly reduced both AUCs, almost to the level observed after the low-CHO intervention (Figure 1, Table 4).
|
|
Postprandial plasma concentrations of TRLapoB-48, TRLapoB-100, and TRL-apoE are shown in Figure 2. The AUCs for each of these apolipoproteins were significantly higher after the high-CHO intervention than after the low-CHO intervention (Table 4). After the high-CHO-Ex intervention, the AUCs for all 3 measured apolipoproteins were significantly lower than after the high-CHO intervention (Figure 2, Table 4).
|
Serum RLP cholesterol concentration increased after meals (main effect of time, P<0.001;Table 3). Postprandial concentrations were 40% higher after the high-CHO intervention than after the low-CHO intervention, but exercise prevented this increase.
The serum insulin and 3-hydroxybutyrate responses to the test meal are shown in Figure 3. The 3-hydroxybutyrate AUC was significantly lower after the high-CHO intervention than after the low-CHO intervention (Table 4). The insulin AUC was significantly lower after the high-CHO-Ex intervention than after the low-CHO and high-CHO interventions. No significant differences were observed in the glucose or nonesterified fatty acid responses to the meal (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the fasted state, plasma TG and TRL-TG concentrations were higher after the high-CHO intervention than after the low-CHO intervention. It has been suggested that elevated TG synthesis by the liver and inadequate or reduced TG clearance could contribute to carbohydrate-induced hypertriglyceridemia.22 The increased presence of apoB-48containing TRL particles in the 12-hour fasted state after the high-CHO intervention was a surprising observation, taking into consideration that the subjects had consumed very little fat (
35 g) the day before. These particles may constitute a subpopulation of chylomicron remnants with a slow turnover,23 and increased competition with VLDL particles24 (elevated 3-fold after the high-CHO intervention) could have prolonged their residence time in the circulation.
The carbohydrate-induced enhancement of postprandial TG and TRL responses would arise, in part, from the hypertriglyceridemia observed in the fasted state, because increases in fasting VLDL would increase competition for LPL when newly synthesized chylomicrons appear after a meal.24 It has been suggested that the increase in VLDL-TG secretion rate due to a high-carbohydrate diet results from an inhibitory effect of this diet on hepatic oxidation of plasma-derived fatty acids, which is expected to increase the availability of fatty acids for TG synthesis in the liver.25 In the present study, the lower 3-hydroxybutyrate response after the high-CHO than after the low-CHO intervention (Table 4, Figure 3) constitutes evidence of a suppressive effect of the high-CHO intervention on hepatic fatty acid oxidation.
Compared with the low-CHO intervention, the high-CHO intervention led to more apoE-enriched VLDL particles in the fasted state and an exaggerated and protracted TRL-apoE postprandial response. A transient increase in TRL-apoE concentration is expected in the postprandial state because of the redistribution of apoE from the HDL to the TRL fraction.26 ApoE allows for the uptake and recognition of TRL remnants by a receptor-dependent process in the liver,27 and as a result, TRL-apo E levels decrease again. According to this reasoning, the high postprandial TRL-apoE concentrations after the high-CHO intervention, especially at the late time points, probably reflect increased residence time in the circulation of TRL remnants that were not taken up efficiently by the liver. This interpretation is supported by the fact that serum RLP cholesterol concentration at 4 hours after the meal was 40% higher after the high- than the low-CHO intervention, suggesting higher levels of cholesteryl esterenriched remnant lipoproteins.
High fasting28 and postprandial1 TG concentrations are independent risk markers for CHD; thus, carbohydrate-induced hypertriglyceridemia may indicate an atherogenic impairment of lipid metabolism. Increases in the number of VLDL particles may be particularly important, especially in the postprandial state, because they then become enriched in cholesterol.29 VLDL particles with remnant characteristics have been isolated from human atherosclerotic plaque.30 The carbohydrate-induced increase in serum RLP cholesterol (a measure of remnant lipoproteins) may also imply a higher CHD risk.2 RLP cholesterol is associated with early atherosclerosis in healthy individuals7 and future coronary events in CHD patients6 independent of other risk factors, including TG and LDL cholesterol levels.
Daily exercise during the consumption of the high-CHO diet prevented fasting and postprandial accumulation of plasma TGs, TRL particles, and their remnants. One explanation may be that exercise decreased hepatic TG secretion,31 partly by altering hepatic partitioning of fatty acids between esterification and oxidation.32 In line with this thinking, the reduction in the postprandial 3-hydroxybutyrate response by the high-CHO intervention was somewhat attenuated by exercise (Table 4, Figure 3). Another explanation may be that exercise opposed the suppressive effects of a diet high in carbohydrates on LPL activity.33 Exercise conditioning increases LPL activity,34 an effect that would improve the capacity for hydrolysis of VLDL-TGs and chylomicron-TGs. The addition of exercise to the high-CHO diet prevented the exaggerated and protracted postprandial TRL-apoE response observed after the high-CHO intervention. The latter effect probably reflects lower levels of remnant lipoproteins, a suggestion that is supported by the lower postprandial serum RLP cholesterol levels.
In the present study, the subjects energy intakes were held constant among interventions, so the effects of exercise may be attributable, in part, to the energy deficit incurred. However, a previous study, also in postmenopausal women, found that the attenuation of postprandial plasma TG concentrations by a single session of exercise was much greater than that attributable to an equivalent energy deficit achieved by reducing energy intake.35 Therefore, other, specifically exercise-related, factors must be involved.
The findings of the present study do not necessarily speak against current population recommendations for the substitution of energy from fat with carbohydrate, not least because our high-CHO diet was extreme and provided a large proportion of energy from sugars. Furthermore, in free-living populations, high-carbohydrate diets may be accompanied by weight loss, which often prevents hypertriglyceridemia.36 However, scientific bodies now recognize that a diet high in carbohydrates may adversely affect the lipoprotein profile,8 at least in some individuals; thus, they advocate a diet high in unsaturated fat as an alternative.37 Our findings show that the adoption of a physically active lifestyle concurrent with a low-fat high-carbohydrate diet is a further option, although larger controlled randomized studies over a longer time scale are needed to examine this proposition. The present study provides evidence that moderate physical activity could be a means of lessening current anxieties about high-carbohydrate diets.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 16, 2001; accepted June 1, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Roberts, A. S Bickerton, B. A Fielding, E. E Blaak, A. J Wagenmakers, M. F-F Chong, M. Gilbert, F. Karpe, and K. N Frayn Reduced oxidation of dietary fat after a short term high-carbohydrate diet Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2008; 87(4): 824 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Kim, O. Y. Kim, S. J. Koh, Y. Jang, S.-S. Yun, J. M. Ordovas, and J. H. Lee Comparison of Low-Fat Meal and High-Fat Meal on Postprandial Lipemic Response in Non-Obese Men according to the -1131T>C Polymorphism of the Apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5) Gene (Randomized Cross-Over Design). J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2006; 25(4): 340 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K Fried and S. P Rao Sugars, hypertriglyceridemia, and cardiovascular disease Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2003; 78(4): 873S - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |