Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2001;21:1238-1243
doi: 10.1161/hq0701.092246
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scanu, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scanu, A. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2001;21:1238.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Changes in Plasma Triglyceride Levels Shift Lipoprotein(a) Density in Parallel With That of LDL Independently of Apolipoprotein(a) Size

Kei Nakajima; Janet Hinman; Ditta Pfaffinger; Celina Edelstein; Angelo M. Scanu

From the Department of Medicine (K.N., J.H., D.P., C.E., A.M.S.) and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (A.M.S.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. Dr Nakajima is now at National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.

Correspondence to Dr Angelo M. Scanu, Department of Medicine, MC 5041, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail ascanu{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] represents a class of low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles that have as a protein moiety apolipoprotein B-100–linked covalently to a single molecule of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], a specific multikringle protein of the plasminogen family. Lp(a) is polymorphic in density because of either the density heterogeneity of constitutive LDL, apo(a) size, or both. Authentic LDL also represents a set of heterogeneous particles whose density is affected by metabolic events. Whether in vivo these events may also affect Lp(a) density is not clearly established. To this effect, we studied 75 subjects with plasma Lp(a) protein levels between 7 and 50 mg/dL and containing a single apo(a) size isoform. We used density gradient ultracentrifugation to simultaneously monitor the changes in the peak density of LDL and Lp(a) at entry and during the course of treatments directed at reducing plasma triglyceride levels. In each case, we found that at entry, Lp(a) peak density was correlated with LDL peak density (r=0.71, P<0.0001) and that during treatment, changes in plasma triglycerides were associated with shifts of Lp(a) peak density that paralleled those of LDL peak density. A high correlation (r=0.94, P<0.0001) was particularly evident in subjects with initial plasma triglycerides in the 300-mg/dL range. In vitro assembly studies showed that an apo(a) isoform containing 14 kringle IV type 2 repeats, exhibited, on incubation with LDL, a comparable degree of incorporation into LDL species varying in density between 1.035 and 1.057 g/mL Taken together, our results indicate that metabolically dependent changes in the peak density of Lp(a) can occur independently of apo(a) size. These changes may have to be taken into account in assessing the cardiovascular pathogenicity of this lipoprotein particle in hypertriglyceridemic subjects.


Key Words: hypertriglyceridemia • lipoprotein(a) density • LDL density • apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism • lipoprotein(a) cardiovascular pathogenicity


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] constitutes a class of lipoprotein particles that is more commonly represented by LDL having as a protein moiety 1 molecule of apoB-100 linked covalently to 1 molecule of apo(a).1 2 Apo(a) varies in size between 300 and 800 kDa, depending on the number of kringle IV (KIV) type 2 repeats. This size polymorphism is an important determinant in the density heterogeneity of Lp(a).3 4 Another important contributing factor to the density of Lp(a) is the density of its constitutive LDL, which is the resultant of the surface concentration of phospholipids, unesterified cholesterol, core cholesteryl esters, and triglycerides and the content of apoB-100.5 6 7 Several density-dependent species of LDL may be present in the plasma as a function of genetic effects and metabolically related events. An example is provided by the shift in density between small dense and larger buoyant LDLs occurring as a function of the plasma levels of triglyceride-rich particles.8 As an LDL variant, Lp(a) would be expected to undergo metabolically dependent density remodeling. However, the information on this subject is limited. Thus, in the present study, we used temporally spaced density gradient ultracentrifugal analyses to determine the peak densities of LDL and Lp(a) in each of our study subjects who expressed in their plasma a single apo(a) size isoform at entry and while undergoing treatment for their dyslipidemia. In the present study, we show that at entry, the peak density of Lp(a) was highly correlated with that of LDL peak density and that modifications of the plasma triglyceride levels were attended by parallel shifts of the 2 peak densities independently of apo(a) size.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
Materials were purchased from the following sources: 4-amidinophenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, D(+)trehalose EDTA, dithioerythritol, 2-mercaptoethanol, and butylated hydroxytoluene from Sigma Chemical Co; molecular weight standards for native gradient gels from Pharmacia-LKB; {lambda} DNA size standards and polyacrylamide from Bio-Rad; Immobilon-P membranes from Millipore; and an enhanced chemiluminescent kit (ECL Western Blotting Detection kit) from Amersham. All other chemicals were of reagent grade.

Human Subjects
The 75 subjects were chosen from the patient population of {approx}300 patients followed in the Lipid Clinic of the University of Chicago because of a personal and/or family history of a plasma lipoprotein abnormality and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The latter was assessed by the occurrence of >=1 cardiovascular events, positive coronary angiographic analyses, or a thallium stress test. The characteristics of the population studied are summarized in Table 1Down. All of these subjects were diagnosed as having a mixed hyperlipidemia for which they were undergoing or about to undergo treatment based on changes in lifestyle and the use of hypolipidemic agents, either a statin, a fibrate, or both. The subjects under study had plasma levels of Lp(a) protein >=7.0 mg/dL, a single apo(a) size isoform, and a single peak of LDL and Lp(a) in the density gradient ultracentrifugal profile (see below).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Subjects

Blood Collection
All subjects gave informed consent according to a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Advisory Board. Blood samplings were carried out at least 8 weeks after an acute cardiovascular event. The subjects were fasted overnight, and the blood was obtained from the antecubital vein. For plasma analyses, the blood was collected into EDTA-containing tubes (purple top), which were spun within 30 minutes from collection. The plasma after the addition of an antiproteolytic cocktail9 was stored at 4°C in airtight containers until use.

Plasma Analyses
Total plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol were determined in a Vitros DT60 II System (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics) according to the instructions of the manufacturer and with the use of calibrators verified by the College of American Pathologists. The LDL cholesterol was calculated according to the Friedewald formula10 and thus included Lp(a) cholesterol.11 The Lp(a) concentration in terms of protein was determined by ELISA with the method of Fless et al.12

Antisera
Antisera to purified preparations of apo(a), Lp(a), and LDL were raised in the rabbit, and affinity-purified antibodies to apo(a), Lp(a), and LDL (anti-apoB) were prepared as previously described.12 Both anti-apo(a) and anti-Lp(a) were devoid of immunoreactivity to LDL and plasminogen; anti-apoB was unreactive to apo(a).

Phenotyping and Genotyping of Apo(a)
Apo(a) phenotyping was performed on either reduced plasma, isolated apo(a), or Lp(a) samples by 4% SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with the use of anti-Lp(a). In the plasma, we found only a major phenotype identified in the major Lp(a) peak in the ultracentrifugal density gradient profile (see below). The mobility of the individual apo(a) bands was compared with isolated apo(a) isoforms of known molecular weights. Some of the standards consisting of number-based recombinant apo(a) KIVs were a gift from Dr Angles-Cano (INSERM U.143, Paris, France). Among the individuals studied, the apo(a) phenotype in that peak contained from 9 to 27 KIV type 2 repeats. For apo(a) genotyping, DNA plugs were prepared from blood mononuclear cells and subsequently fractionated by pulsed-field electrophoresis, and the blots were probed with an apo(a) specific probe essentially as described earlier.13 All subjects had 2 alleles that ranged between 148 and 52 kb.

Isolation of Apo(a) From Lp(a)
Apo(a) was isolated from Lp(a) essentially as described previously14 with some modifications. Briefly, 1 mg/mL protein was incubated with dithioerythritol at a final concentration of 1.25 mmol/L. {epsilon}-Amino-n-caproic acid (EACA) at a final concentration of 100 mmol/L was then added, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour under argon. After dialysis against 10 mmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.02% NaN3, and 100 mmol/L EACA, the sample was diluted with D2O (3:1 [vol/vol]) containing 100 mmol/L EACA, and the resulting mixture was placed into a Ti80 rotor and ultracentrifuged at 15°C and 80 000 rpm for 20 hours. After centrifugation, the top fraction contained LDL free of apo(a) and unreacted Lp(a). The bottom 2-mL fraction contained free apo(a) in pure form.

Isopycnic Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation
Isopycnic density gradient ultracentrifugation was carried out according to an updated version of a previously described technique.15 In brief, a nonlinear salt gradient was constructed to maximize the separation of LDL, Lp(a), and HDL classes. VLDL remained at the top of the tube. The gradient consisted of 1 mL of a 1.21 g/mL solution made of NaCl and NaBr, 4 mL of 4 mol/L NaCl, and 0.2 mL plasma, and the rest of the tube was filled to a total of 13.2 mL with 0.67 mol/L NaCl. This discontinuous gradient was centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor (SW40, Beckman) at 39 000 rpm for 50 hours. At the end of the run, each tube was pierced at the bottom, and a dense solution (Fluorinert, ISCO) was pumped in at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The effluent emerging from the top of the tube was monitored at 280 nm in a UA-5 ISCO absorbance monitor and recorded on a chart with a chart speed of 60 cm/h and a flow of 1 mL/cm. Density calibration was carried out by measuring the densities of each collected gradient fraction (0.9 mL) with use of a Mettler/Paar Precision Density Meter (model DMA 02C), as we reported previously.15 The distribution of Lp(a), in terms of protein, was determined throughout the profile by ELISA12 on fractions collected in a fraction collector. Figure 1Down shows the density curve superimposed on the lipoprotein absorbance profile of the plasma of a subject with a plasma Lp(a) protein level of 5.0 mg/dL. These determinations were carried out at entry and at yearly intervals in the longitudinal studies. The subjects selected for the study had plasma levels of Lp(a) protein of at least 7.0 mg/dL to permit detection of a peak in the density gradient profile. This peak contained a single apo(a) isoform ranging between 14 and 20 KIV type 2 repeats as assessed by reduced 4% SDS-PAGE carried out on the gradient fractions. In the longitudinal studies, the correlation between migration and peak density in each ultracentrifugal profile was defined by the following equation: y=1.0339-0.0005979x+0.00091978x2, where y is the density, and x is the distance in centimeters on the chart from the origin of the gradient (top of tube) to the lipoprotein peak. The validity of this equation was determined in preliminary studies in which we established a close correlation (r=0.95) between density, directly measured in a density meter, and migration in the ultracentrifugal field, measured on the chart in centimeters. Moreover, during the course of the subsequent longitudinal studies, the validity of the equation was checked randomly by directly measuring the densities of the lipoprotein peaks. In preliminary studies, we also established that in hypertriglyceridemia, a very small amount of apo(a) [<1% of the total plasma apo(a)] was present in the low density portion of the gradient containing the triglyceride-rich particles. This amount did not contribute significantly to the total plasma apo(a) mass and was not taken into account in our subsequent studies.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Density gradient ultracentrifugal profile of representative plasma. Plasma (0.2 mL), obtained from a subject with a low level of Lp(a) protein (5 mg/dL), was subjected to density gradient fractionation as described in Methods. The salt gradient, shown by the curved line, was obtained by density measurements of collected individual fractions and is designated by open circles.

In Vitro Assembly Studies
In vitro assembly studies were carried out according to the method previously described by Edelstein et al.14 In brief, apo(a), 1 µg of a defined phenotype obtained from Lp(a) by the procedure outlined above, was incubated separately with 6 single species of LDL varying in density between 1.035 and 1.057 g/mL isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation from selected subjects with levels of Lp(a) protein <1 mg/dL. The incubations were carried out at an apoB-100:apo(a) molar ratio of 25:1 for 6 hours at 37°C in the presence of 50 µL butylated hydroxytoluene, aprotinin (10 000 kallikrein inhibitory units/mL), and 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, under nitrogen. At the end of the incubation period, aliquots of the incubation mixture were analyzed on Western blots of SDS-PAGE under nonreducing and reducing conditions. To quantify the amount of Lp(a) assembled, an aliquot (125 µL) of the reaction mixture was diluted with an equal volume of 60% sucrose in 10 mmol/L phosphate buffer containing 200 mmol/L EACA to prevent noncovalent association between apo(a) and apoB-100 and spun in a Beckman TLA 100 rotor (tube capacity 250 µL) at 412 160g at 15°C for 18 hours. The top fraction containing the apoB-100:apo(a) covalent complex was collected, and the concentration was determined by ELISA as described by Fless et al.12 The bottom 100 µL containing free apo(a) was also quantified by a sandwich ELISA specific for apo(a) with the use of anti-Lp(a) for coating and alkaline phosphatase–conjugated anti-apo(a) for detection.

Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting
SDS-PAGE (4% polyacrylamide) was performed on a Novex system for 1.5 hours at a constant voltage (120 V) at 22°C, as previously described.16

After electroblotting, the Immobilon blots were blocked in PBS containing 5% dry powdered milk and 0.3% Tween 20, followed by incubation with anti-Lp(a) or anti-apoB antibody and visualized with the ECL Western Detection Reagent, as previously described.16

Statistical Analysis
The correlation between LDL and Lp(a) densities was performed by the Pearson parametric test. The correlation between the shift of the Lp(a) peak density and that of LDL was assessed by the nonparametric Spearman rank test. The change in LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) protein between the initiation of the studies and during the treatment period was evaluated by the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. We considered values of P<0.05 to be significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Baseline Studies
The general characteristics of the 75 subjects at the initiation of the study is shown in Table 1Up. They had relatively high plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. The Lp(a) protein was also elevated (upper limit of normal 7.0 mg/dL, or 10th percentile). The distribution of LDL and Lp(a) peak density was markedly different (Figure 2Down), with Lp(a) banding at densities higher than LDL. Figure 3Down shows a significant correlation between plasma triglyceride levels and LDL (r=0.61, P<0.0001) and Lp(a) (r=0.4, P<0.001). In all 75 subjects, the correlation between Lp(a) peak density and LDL peak density was also highly significant (r=0.71, P<0.0001; Figure 4Down). On the other hand, both LDL and Lp(a) peak densities were negatively correlated with plasma HDL cholesterol levels: r=0.55 (P<0.0001) and r=0.57 (P<0.0001), respectively. Of note, the 2 peak densities showed no correlation with either plasma baseline LDL cholesterol or Lp(a) protein concentrations.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Peak density distribution of plasma LDL and Lp(a). Plasma from 75 subjects, obtained at the time of entry into the study, was subjected to density gradient ultracentrifugation, and the densities of the LDL (top) and Lp(a) (bottom) peak fractions were measured for each subject.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relationship between total plasma triglyceride levels and the peak densities of LDL (top) and Lp(a) (bottom) of each subject. Open circles are data points of the densities of individual plasma LDL and Lp(a) peaks resolved by density gradient ultracentrifugation.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Relationship between plasma LDL and Lp(a) peak densities in the plasma. Open circles are data points of the densities of individual plasma LDL and Lp(a) peaks resolved by density gradient ultracentrifugation.

Longitudinal Studies
Longitudinal studies were conducted to determine whether changes in plasma triglycerides levels in any given individual who expressed in their plasma a single major apo(a) isoform could result in changes in the concentration and density of LDL and Lp(a). In terms of concentration, the LDL cholesterol values dropped {approx}22% (P<0.05), from a mean of 139±44 to 108±36 mg/dL. This drop was recorded after 1 year, when normalization of the plasma triglyceride levels was also attained. On the other hand, during the same period of observation, the Lp(a) protein level remained essentially unchanged (17.4 to 19.4 mg/dL, P>0.5). In terms of density, during the total period of observation that varied from 1 to 15 years, important changes were observed, as shown in the 3 representative profiles in Figure 5Down obtained in the same subject at 1 and 2 years from baseline after the initiation of a statin therapy. The lowering of the plasma cholesterol and triglycerides was associated with a parallel shift of both LDL and Lp(a) peaks to a higher density (Figure 5Down, middle panel). We observed a reverse shift of the density of both lipoproteins when, because of lack of compliance, a rise in the fasting plasma triglycerides occurred (bottom panel). These shifts were measured in centimeters on the chart output, indicating the migration of the lipoprotein from the top of the gradient to the isopycnic position. The density was calculated according to the formula given in Methods. The parallel shifts of the LDL and Lp(a) peak densities as a function of changes in plasma triglyceride levels were observed in all subjects (r=0.82, P<0.0001). However, the correlation was particularly striking (r=0.94, P<0.0001) in 23 subjects. Some of them were studied when their plasma triglyceride levels decreased from the 300-mg/dL range to normal, and some were studied when the values increased from normal to high because of a lack of therapeutic compliance (Figure 6Down). In this figure, positive density shifts correspond to changes of triglycerides from high to normal levels, and negative density shifts correspond to changes from normal to high levels. In data not included in Figure 6Down, we also found that within the 23 subjects, the density shifts from high to low and from low to high occurred more than once as a function of variations of the plasma triglyceride levels.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Shifts in the LDL and Lp(a) peak densities in a representative subject before and during treatment: top, before treatment; middle, 1 year after treatment, when a significant lowering of the plasma triglycerides was achieved; and bottom, 2 years after treatment, when the plasma triglyceride levels were again elevated.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Relationship between plasma LDL and Lp(a) peak density shifts. The data were obtained from 23 subjects with entering plasma triglyceride levels in the 300-mg/dL range. Each data point represents the difference in the density of the LDL and Lp(a) peaks during changes in plasma triglycerides. Positive density shifts correspond to changes of triglycerides from high to normal levels. Negative density shifts correspond to changes of triglycerides from normal to high levels.

In Vitro Assembly Studies
As detailed in Methods, a constant amount of apo(a) of a defined size was incubated separately with each of the 6 LDL fractions, varying in density between 1.035 and 1.057 g/mL. At the end of this incubation period, each mixture was subjected to immunoblot analyses, with the use of anti-apo(a) and anti–apoB-100 antibodies, to determine on a qualitative basis whether a covalent linkage between apo(a) and the apoB-100 of each of the donor LDLs had occurred. Immunoblots of nondenaturing gels showed that most of the apo(a) had migrated with apoB-100 in the position of a standard Lp(a). Subsequent immunoblots of denaturing SDS gels showed that the band corresponding to the apo(a):apoB-100 complex in the nonreduced gel was no longer present in the reduced gel. To quantify the reassembly process, each incubation mixture was spun in a Beckman TLA 100 rotor in the presence of 200 mmol/L EACA, and the top and bottom aliquots were collected and analyzed by ELISA. Irrespective of the LDL species used, the amount of apo(a) that was covalently linked to apoB-100 of the reconstituted Lp(a) was {approx}70% of the starting apo(a) (Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. In Vitro Reassembly of Apo(a) With Various LDL Species


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our present study has shown that when apo(a) size polymorphism is factored out, the density of an Lp(a) particle parallels that of authentic LDL. We derived this conclusion by using density gradient ultracentrifugation to determine the peak density of these 2 lipoproteins in the plasma of hypertriglyceridemic subjects exhibiting a single apo(a) isoform at entry and while undergoing treatment for their lipid abnormality. Our choice of mixed hyperlipidemias as a model was based on the results of previous observations showing that modulations of plasma triglyceride levels have an impact on the density and distribution of LDL particles.8 In the present study, we confirmed those findings and, in addition, established that when apo(a) size is a constant, shifts of Lp(a) density occur and are correlated with changes in plasma triglyceride levels and LDL density and are thus metabolically dependent. This conclusion is in keeping with previous studies by Rainwater et al,6 who conducted density measurements in the plasma of 246 subjects exhibiting single apo(a) size isoforms. By statistical analyses, after correction for the effects of apo(a) size, the residual density of Lp(a) attributed to metabolic factors was found to be correlated with that of LDL. Of additional interest in the present study, although perhaps not unexpected,1 2 was the observation that despite the marked drop in plasma triglyceride and LDL cholesterol, the attending change in Lp(a) density had no significant effect on the plasma concentration of Lp(a) protein. Our results also suggest that the components of constitutive LDL in Lp(a) are readily exchanged with the authentic LDL species in the plasma and that apo(a) may not hinder these lipid exchange processes,

Among our subjects, apo(a) varied widely in size (from 9 to 27 KIV type 2 repeats). In each case, a shift in the peak density of Lp(a) occurred as a function of the change in plasma triglyceride levels, indicating that apo(a) size was not a factor in this shift and thus pointing to its dependence on the LDL density. This conclusion received support from the in vitro data showing that the same apo(a) can be incorporated to a comparable degree into LDL species of a different density. These observations may be taken to indicate that in vivo, apo(a), in terms of covalent association, does not discriminate among LDL species. However, a definitive conclusion on this specificity of association would require metabolic studies within subjects during normotriglyceridemia and hypertriglyceridemia, taking into account both apo(a) size polymorphism and LDL density heterogeneity. These studies were outside the immediate scope of the present study. However, it is apparent that in the same individual, an apo(a) of a given size can affiliate with either a small, intermediate, or a large buoyant LDL, depending on the availability of these particles in the plasma. Up to 34 apo(a) size isoforms have been reported.17 Given the fact that there is 1 molecule of apo(a) per Lp(a) particle,18 one would predict, on genetic considerations only, an equivalent number of Lp(a) particles in the plasma. However, on the basis of our present results, this theoretical number is likely to be an underestimate, because any given apo(a) size isoform can potentially bind to different individual LDL density species.

The above observations raise the question of whether the density of the LDL constituent of Lp(a) might have an influence on the cardiovascular pathogenicity of this lipoprotein independently or in addition to that of apo(a). For instance, we may ask whether the affiliation with a given apo(a) phenotype may increase the recognized risk for coronary heart disease of small dense LDL particles.19 In other words, it would be important to consider that pathogenicity may relate to Lp(a) density, which is the resultant of the density of the constitutive LDL and apo(a) size. Because of the relatively low number and diversity of subjects, our results provide no answer to this question but should invite large-scale studies in which measurements of plasma Lp(a) levels and apo(a) size isoforms are conducted in parallel with those of Lp(a) and LDL density. In this regard, normotriglyceridemic subjects may represent another useful model. In preliminary studies on 6 subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, we have observed that the Lp(a) density is a function of apo(a) size and is not significantly affected when the plasma levels of LDL but not its density are modified by the action of statin-based therapies (A.M. Scanu, unpublished data, 2001). In the case of familial hypercholesterolemia, high plasma levels of Lp(a) have been reported to increase the cardiovascular risk of this metabolic disorder.20 It would be of interest to determine whether this increase in risk may be related to the density in addition to the plasma concentrations of Lp(a).


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants 63115 and 63209 from the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Received February 9, 2001; accepted April 30, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Scanu AM, Lawn RM, Berg K. Lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerosis. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:209–218.

2. Scanu AM, Edelstein C. Kringle-dependent structural and functional polymorphism of apolipoprotein. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1256:1–12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Kraft HG, Sandholzer C, Menzel HJ, Utermann G. Apolipoprotein(a) alleles determine lipoprotein(a) particle density and concentration in plasma. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:302–306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Reblin T, Rader DJ, Beisiegel U, Greten H, Brewer HB. Correlation of apolipoprotein(a) isoproteins with Lp(a) density and distribution in fasting plasma. Atherosclerosis. 1992;94:223–232.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Fless GM, ZumMallen ME, Scanu AM. Physicochemical properties of apolipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein(a-) derived from the dissociation of human plasma lipoprotein (a). J Biol Chem. 1986;1986:8712–8718.

6. Rainwater DL, Ludwig MJ, Haffner SM, Vandeberg JL. Lipid and lipoprotein factors associated with variation in Lp(a) density. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:313–319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Rainwater DL. Lp(a) concentrations are related to plasma lipid concentrations. Atherosclerosis. 1996;127:13–18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Austin MA, Hokanson JE. Epidemiology of triglycerides, small dense low-density lipoprotein, and lipoprotein(a) as risk factors for coronary heart disease. Med Clin North Am. 1994;78:99–115.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Edelstein C, Scanu AM. Precautionary measures for collecting blood destined for lipoprotein isolation. Methods Enzymol. 1986;128:151–155.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the distribution of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without the use of the preparative centrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502.[Abstract]

11. Scanu AM. Lipoprotein(a), Friedewald formula, and NCEP guidelines: National Cholesterol Education Program. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:608–609.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Fless GM, Snyder ML, Scanu AM. Enzyme-linked immunoassay for Lp(a). J Lipid Res. 1989;30:651–662.[Abstract]

13. Lackner C, Boerwinkle E, Leffert CC, Rahmig T, Hobbs HH. Molecular basis of apolipoprotein(a) isoform size heterogeneity as revealed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:2153–2161.

14. Edelstein C, Mandala M, Pfaffinger D, Scanu AM. Determinants of lipoprotein(a) assembly: a study of wild-type and mutant apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes isolated from human and rhesus monkey lipoprotein(a) under mild reductive conditions. Biochemistry. 1995;34:16483–16492.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Nilsson J, Mannickarottu V, Edelstein C, Scanu AM. An improved detection system applied to the study of serum lipoproteins after single-step density gradient ultracentrifugation. Anal Biochem. 1981;110:342–348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Edelstein C, Italia JA, Klezovitch O, Scanu AM. Functional and metabolic differences between elastase-generated fragments of human lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a). J Lipid Res. 1996;37:1786–1801.[Abstract]

17. Marcovina SM, Zhang ZH, Gaur VP, Albers JJ. Identification of 34 apolipoprotein(a) isoforms: differential expression of apolipoprotein(a) alleles between American black and whites. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;191:1192–1196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Albers JJ, Kennedy H, Marcovina SM. Evidence that Lp(a) contains one molecule of apo(a) and one molecule of apoB: evaluation of amino acid analysis data. J Lipid Res. 1996;37:192–196.[Abstract]

19. Austin MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Willett WC, Krauss RM. Low-density lipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1988;260:1917–1921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Utermann G, Lipoprotein(a). In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Inc; 1995:1887–1912.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. Schneider, J. L. Witztum, S. G. Young, E. H. Ludwig, E. R. Miller, S. Tsimikas, L. K. Curtiss, S. M. Marcovina, J. M. Taylor, R. M. Lawn, et al.
High-level lipoprotein [a] expression in transgenic mice: evidence for oxidized phospholipids in lipoprotein [a] but not in low density lipoproteins
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 769 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. A. Austin, K. L. Edwards, S. A. Monks, K. M. Koprowicz, J. D. Brunzell, A. G. Motulsky, M. C. Mahaney, and J. E. Hixson
Genome-wide scan for quantitative trait loci influencing LDL size and plasma triglyceride in familial hypertriglyceridemia
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 2161 - 2168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. F. Ayyobi, S. H. McGladdery, M. J. McNeely, M. A. Austin, A. G. Motulsky, and J. D. Brunzell
Small, Dense LDL and Elevated Apolipoprotein B Are the Common Characteristics for the Three Major Lipid Phenotypes of Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2003; 23(7): 1289 - 1294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scanu, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scanu, A. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism