| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension (A.R.C., W.P.M., U.K., S.J., S.W., G.N., W.A.H., R.E.L.), Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif; the Molecular Biology Institute (W.A.H., R.E.L.), Los Angeles, Calif; the Department of Medicine/Cardiology (U.K.), Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University, and the German Heart Institute (U.K.), Berlin, Germany; and the Department of Medicine (W.P.), UCSD, La Jolla, Calif.
Correspondence to Ronald E. Law, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, 900 Veteran Ave, Suite 24-130, Box 957073, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail rlaw{at}mednet.ucla.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) is a
ligand-activated nuclear receptor expressed in all of the major
cell types found in atherosclerotic lesions:
monocytes/macrophages, endothelial cells, and
smooth muscle cells. In vitro, PPAR
ligands inhibit cell
proliferation and migration, 2 processes critical for vascular lesion
formation. In contrast to these putative antiatherogenic activities,
PPAR
has been shown in vitro to upregulate the CD36 scavenger
receptor, which could promote foam cell formation. Thus, it is unclear
what impact PPAR
activation will have on the development and
progression of atherosclerosis. This issue is important
because thiazolidinediones, which are ligands for PPAR
, have
recently been approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, a state of
accelerated atherosclerosis. We report herein that the
PPAR
ligand, troglitazone, inhibited lesion formation in male low
density lipoprotein receptordeficient mice fed either a high-fat
diet, which also induces type 2 diabetes, or a high-fructose diet.
Troglitazone decreased the accumulation of macrophages in
intimal xanthomas, consistent with our in vitro observation
that troglitazone and another thiazolidinedione, rosiglitazone,
inhibited monocyte chemoattractant protein-1directed
transendothelial migration of monocytes. Although
troglitazone had some beneficial effects on metabolic risk
factors (in particular, a reduction of insulin levels in the diabetic
model), none of the systemic cardiovascular risk
factors was consistently improved in either model. These
observations suggest that the inhibition of early atherosclerotic
lesion formation by troglitazone may result, at least in part, from
direct effects of PPAR
activation in the artery
wall.
Key Words: atherosclerosis diabetes mellitus pharmacology
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
), a nuclear
receptor, is expressed in all major cell types participating in
vascular injury: endothelial cells (ECs),
macrophages, and vascular smooth muscle cells
(VSMCs).1 2 3 4 5 6
Activation of this receptor in vitro inhibits inflammatory processes,
including cytokine production and expression of NO
synthase.2 In early clinical
investigations, ligands of PPAR
, such as thiazolidinediones (TZDs),
have also been reported to improve
endothelium-dependent vasodilation, suggesting that
PPAR
activation enhances NO production and protects against
vascular injury.7 8
Activation of PPAR
also inhibits 2 other processes critical for
vascular lesion formation, cell proliferation, and migration.
3,5,6,9,10 In vivo, 2 TZDs, troglitazone
(TRO) and pioglitazone, significantly reduced arterial
neointimal hyperplasia after endothelial
injury in
rats.11 12 13
In such balloon-catheterized arteries, neointima formation
essentially reflects increased migration and proliferation of VSMCs, a
major contributor to the growth of atherosclerotic lesions. TRO also inhibited
neointima formation in stents placed in the
coronary arteries of patients with type 2
diabetes.14
We and others have recently demonstrated that PPAR
activation by TZDs and
15-deoxy-
12 14 -prostaglandin
J2 inhibits EC expression of vascular cell
adhesion molecule-1, which mediates monocyte adherence to the
endothelial
surface.4 15 Because
inflammation, dysregulated growth, and migration of monocytes and VSMCs
play an important role in the development of
atherosclerosis, we hypothesized that PPAR
activation in cells of the vasculature would inhibit the
atherosclerotic process. On the other hand, TZDs also stimulate
conversion of macrophages into foam cells; therefore,
ligand-dependent activation of PPAR
has been postulated to promote
atherosclerosis.16
The impact of TZDs on atherosclerosis is a critical issue. TZDs improve insulin-mediated glucose uptake and are used extensively in the treatment of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus.17 Coronary artery disease mortality is increased 2- to 4-fold in type 2 diabetes.18 Atherosclerosis is the major cause of demise in people with diabetes; therefore, it is important to determine the action of any antidiabetic drug on the atherosclerotic process.
To determine whether PPAR
activation has proatherogenic
or antiatherogenic effects, we administered TRO to male LDL
receptordeficient
(LDLR-/-)
mice fed either a high-fat or a high-fructose atherogenic diet. Both
models develop substantial hypercholesterolemia
and macrophage-laden lesions, designated intimal xanthomata,
which do not normally progress to mature atherosclerotic
plaques.19 In addition, the
high-fat diet induces hyperglycemia and
hyperinsulinemia in the
LDLR-/-
mouse, making it also a model of type 2
diabetes.20 21 In
contrast, fructose does not increase glucose or insulin in this
model21 and, therefore, was
useful because the effects of TZDs on atherosclerosis
could be studied in the absence of improvements in insulin
action.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Western Blots
Western immunoblots were performed as
previously described.10
Membranes were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies (1:1000
dilution, New England Biolabs) that recognize either (1) total
extracellular signalregulated kinase (ERK) or (2) ERK
phosphorylated on threonine 202 and tyrosine
204.
Animals and Diets
Male
LDLR-/-
mice were obtained (C57BL/6J-Ldlrtm1Her,
stock No. 002207, Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Me) and were
group-housed under a 12-hour light and 12-hour dark regimen. All animal
protocols were approved by the UCLA Animal Research Committee and
complied with all federal, state, and institutional regulations. At 3
months of age, the mice were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 dietary
regimens: (1) chow (Harlan Teklad 8604), (2) high-fat complex
carbohydrate (Research Diets), (3) high-fat complex carbohydrate with
4 g TRO/kg of food, (4) high fructose (Research Diets), or (5)
high fructose with 4 g TRO/kg of food. The high-fat diet consisted
of 21% fat, 20% protein, 50% carbohydrate, and 0.15%
cholesterol. Our high-fat diet differed from those commonly
used to study atherogenesis in
LDLR-/-
mice in that the majority of the nonfat energy came from complex
carbohydrate sources instead of sucrose. The high-fructose diet
contained 4% fat, 16% protein, 71% fructose, and 0.15%
cholesterol. Sources of fat in the diets were corn oil (1%
in all diets) and anhydrous milk fat (3% in the fructose diets and
20% in the high fat diets). Mice and feed were weighed weekly, and the
rate of consumption of drug was computed. The mice were fed for a
period of 12 weeks.
Metabolic Measurements
Blood samples from the retro-orbital sinus were
obtained from the mice before the beginning of treatment and every
month thereafter and from the abdominal vena cava at euthanasia. Mice
were fasted overnight before the collection of the blood samples.
Plasma glucose was measured by glucose oxidase reaction (Beckman
Glucose Analyzer 2, Beckman Instruments). Plasma lipids were
measured by the UCLA Lipid Analysis Laboratory. Plasma insulin
was determined by ELISA. Blood pressures were obtained by using an
indirect tail-cuff method with a controlled temperature chamber (IITC,
Inc) by a technician blinded to the treatment
groups.
Vessel Preparation and Image
Analysis
Mice were euthanized and perfused with 7.5% sucrose
in 4% paraformaldehyde. Aortas were dissected out,
split longitudinally, pinned flat in a dissection pan, and stained with
Sudan IV to detect lipids and determine lesion area. Images were
captured by use of a Sony 3-CCD video camera and analyzed by a
single technician who was blinded to the study protocol and used
ImagePro image analysis software. The extent of lesion
formation is expressed as the percentage of the total aortic surface
area covered by lesions.
Cross Sections: Determination of Intimal
Macrophage Content
The largest lesions from the aortic arch were excised
and embedded in paraffin. The avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex
technique for immunostaining was used.
Macrophages were stained by using monoclonal antibody to CD68
(titer 1:100, KP1 clone, M0814, Dako Corp). Nonimmune serum was used as
a control. Primary antibody incubations were performed in 1% BSA/2%
goat serum containing PBS for 60 minutes. Biotinylated rabbit
anti-mouse (Dako) was applied; incubation with a
streptavidin-peroxidase complex followed. Peroxidase activity was
detected with the use of diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as a
chromogen. Slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin. Images of
the stained sections were analyzed by using the software
described above. After tracing the intimal area to be measured with a
cursor, 5 pixels of color, which defined the anti-CD68 stain, were
sampled by the operator. The area encompassed by the pixels, which was
not contiguous, in the color range for anti-CD68 was then computed
automatically by the software. This approach has been successfully used
by Shi et al22 to quantify
lesional macrophages in a mouse model of transplant
arteriosclerosis.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by using
2-factorial ANOVA with Student-Newman-Keuls to determine the
differences between individual group
means.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ligands inhibit ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase
(MAPK)-dependent migration of
VSMCs.10 11
However, in the earliest stages of atherosclerotic lesions, recruitment
of adherent monocytes through their migration into the
subendothelium and their phenotypic transformation to
macrophages and foam cells play a far greater role than VSMCs
in humans and in murine
models.23
To investigate whether TRO-mediated PPAR
activation
affects monocyte recruitment and to further explore its mechanism, we
carried out a series of in vitro experiments before our in vivo
studies. MCP-1 is an important in vivo migration factor promoting the
subendothelial accumulation of monocytes. TRO inhibited
MCP-1directed transmigration of THP-1 monocytes by 32.7±6.5% at 2.5
µmol/L and by 61.4±6.7% at 10 µmol/L
(Figure 1
). TRO contains a vitamin E moiety that may confer
an antioxidant activity that can inhibit monocyte recruitment and
endothelial expression of adhesion molecules. However,
rosiglitazone (RSG), another PPAR
ligand that lacks antioxidant
activity, also inhibited monocyte transmigration, albeit with a lesser
potency than TRO
(Figure 1
). Inhibition of monocyte transmigration by TRO,
therefore, is likely to be mediated at least in part through
PPAR
.
|
MCP-1 rapidly induced ERK activation, reaching a peak at 5
minutes, which was blocked by PD98059, an inhibitor of MAPK
ERK kinase (MEK, an upstream kinase), which phosphorylates
and activates ERK
(Figure 2
). PD98059 attenuated MCP-1directed transmigration
by 84.8±4.8%. In combination, these data suggest that activation of
PPAR
in monocytes may inhibit their migration by interfering with
ERK-MAPK signaling, although the precise mechanism remains to be
determined.
|
TRO Inhibits Intimal Macrophage
Accumulation and Lesion Formation in Male
LDLR-/-
Mice
LDLR-/-
mice that were fed a regular chow diet develop few lesions across the
surface of the aorta. Male 3-month-old
LDLR-/-
mice were placed on either a high-fat or high-fructose diet to induce
atherosclerosis.
LDLR-/-
males were used in the present study because they develop
hyperglycemia and become diabetic on a high-fat diet but remain
normoglycemic when fed a high-fructose diet. Moreover, males develop
twice the level of surface lesions as do
females,24 and their use
obviates the potentially confounding influence of the vascular
protection in females afforded by estrogen. Comparison of the impact of
TRO on atherogenesis in these 2 dietary models was undertaken to
distinguish any activity of PPAR
to normalize metabolic
abnormalities accompanying diabetes that contribute to
high-fatinduced xanthomata formation from any direct effects on the
vasculature. To assess the impact of TRO on aortic lesions, 1 high-fat
diet group and 1 high-fructose diet group received TRO at 400 mg/kg
body wt per day from drugs pelleted into the atherogenic diets. This
dose of TRO was chosen because we previously demonstrated its efficacy
in inhibiting intimal hyperplasia in rats after balloon
injury.11
The en face method, which makes use of computer-assisted
analysis of color images of Sudan IVstained lipid-containing
material in the entire aorta, was used to determine the percentage of
surface area affected by
lesions.24 Male
LDLR-/-
mice on normal chow for 3 months had <0.20% lesions
(Figure 3A
). The high-fat diet increased the amount of
surface lesions after 3 months to 3.90±0.16% (n=8,
Figure 3B
). TRO inhibited the high-fatinduced lesions by
30% (2.76±0.36% of the aortic surface, n=8,
P<0.02;
Figure 3C
). Similar to Merat et
al,21 we noted that the
high-fructose diet was more atherogenic than the high-fat diet, causing
8.42±0.94% lesions (n=17,
Figure 3D
). TRO reduced lesions in fructose-fed
LDLR-/-
males by 42% (4.90±0.65%, n=14,
P<0.01;
Figure 3E
). Quantitative results are summarized in
Figure 4
.
|
|
TRO-treated male
LDLR-/-
mice fed either the high-fat or high-fructose diet for 3 months
developed lesions that contained substantially fewer CD68-staining
macrophages
(Figure 5A
through 5D). Lesions induced by a high-fat diet
contained 39.1±6.8% macrophages (percent of cross-sectional
intimal area) compared with 13.3±4.9%
(P<0.01) in mice administered
TRO
(Figure 5E
). Similar results were obtained for males fed the
high-fructose diet, where TRO decreased macrophage accumulation
from 40.4±3.5% to 17.1±1.7%
(P<0.01,
Figure 5E
). The lesions in the TRO-fed animals tended to be
smaller in volume than those in males not fed TRO. The relative
macrophage content in the larger lesions (not treated with TRO)
exceeded the content in the smaller lesions (treated with TRO) by 140%
to 200%. The reduction in macrophage accumulation in the
lesions of TRO-treated animals is unlikely to be the result of their
being an earlier lesion stage, because the relative macrophage
content is known to be greatest in the smaller (ie, early-stage)
lesions.
|
Effect of TRO on Metabolic
Parameters
All metabolic measurements determined on
blood samples drawn before treatment were similar in all groups
(Tables 1
and 2
). In accordance with previous studies on male
LDLR-/-
mice, we found that a high-fat diet induced
diabetes20 21
(Table 1
). Glucose levels progressively increased throughout
the study, reaching a maximum of 285 mg/dL at 3 months compared with
148 mg/dL for mice on normal chow. The fat-fed males were also
hyperinsulinemic (1198±149 versus 664±113 pg/mL on
normal chow), consistent with the development of early-stage
type II diabetes. Although TRO did not decrease hyperglycemia in
high-fatfed male mice, TRO administration completely normalized their
plasma insulin levels. In marked contrast, mice on a high-fructose diet
had normal fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, which were not
altered by TRO.
|
|
LDLR-/-
males developed severe hypercholesterolemia on
either the high-fat or high-fructose diet, achieving levels 3- to
4-fold greater than those in animals maintained on regular chow
(Table 2
). TRO lowered total plasma cholesterol
by 27% in males on the high-fructose diet but had no effect on the
high-fatfed mice. Triglycerides were elevated in the
high-fatfed males but not in the high-fructose group; TRO did not
alter triglycerides in either model. HDL
cholesterol (HDLC) decreased with both of the diets,
compared with normal chow, as frequently
reported.3 TRO further lowered
the HDLC in the high-fatfed males but increased it in the
high-fructosefed group. Plasma free fatty acid levels increased in
males on the high-fat diet but not in those on the high-fructose diet;
TRO decreased free fatty acid levels in both
models.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the difference in metabolic responses
between the diabetic and nondiabetic animals, both
hypercholesterolemic models responded to TRO with
decreased lesion formation. These results suggest that TRO has direct
vascular effects, separate from its metabolic effects, that
decrease the atherosclerotic process. Alternatively, the
antiatherogenic effects of TRO in the 2 different models might involve
the collection of distinct metabolic processes. For
example, hemodynamic effects of TRO related to its
reported activity to lower blood pressure in animal models and in
humans could also impact pathophysiological
processes in high-fat and high-fructosefed
LDLR-/-
mice.27 28 29 30
All major cell types contributing to this vascular lesion formation
express PPAR
, which provides a mechanism for the direct effect of
thiazolidinedione ligands in the vessel
wall.3 5 6 9
Data from in vitro experiments had suggested mechanisms by which
activation of PPAR
could either accelerate or attenuate the
atherosclerotic
process.2 3 4 5 6 9 10 16
The present study provides conclusive evidence that ligand-induced
PPAR
activation by TRO reduces intimal xanthomata in murine
models.
TRO had several systemic effects that may have contributed to its attenuation of intimal xanthomata. In the diabetic high-fatfed mouse, TRO lowered insulin and glucose levels and decreased HDLC (which is thought to promote atherogenesis). In the fructose-fed model, TRO decreased total cholesterol and increased HDLC. Our finding that TRO was more potent in suppressing lesion formation in the fructose-fed model compared with the high-fatfed mice could be due to the observed 27% reduction in total cholesterol. A common effect of TRO in the high-fatfed and high-fructosefed LDLR-/- models is its suppression of circulating free fatty acid levels. However, increased circulating free fatty acids have not been shown to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis.
Inflammation in the vascular wall has clearly emerged as a
major culprit in the development of
atherosclerosis.31
Damage to the endothelium and the subsequent
recruitment and transendothelial migration of monocytes
constitute critical early cellular responses during
atherogenesis.31
Transmigration of monocytes into the subendothelial
space is strongly stimulated by the chemokine MCP-1, which is expressed
and secreted by ECs and VSMCs. The essential role of MCP-1 in
atherogenesis is underscored by a recent study demonstrating that
crossing MCP-1deficient mice into
LDLR-/-
mice attenuated lesion formation by
>80%.32 Our group and
others have shown that TRO and other PPAR
ligands inhibit growth
factordirected ERK-MAPKdependent VSMC
migration.5 10 11
Cell migration requires de novo gene transcription that is
consistent with PPAR
acting in the nucleus to inhibit this
process.10 In particular,
activation of PPAR
can inhibit ERK-MAPK signaling to the
nucleus.11 33
Because MCP-1directed migration of monocytes is ERK-MAPK dependent,
interference with this pathway by TRO could contribute to the observed
reduction in intimal xanthomata and lesional macrophages in
treated
LDLR-/-
mice.
TRO and another PPAR
ligand, RSG, which does not contain
an
-tocopherol moiety, inhibited MCP-1directed
migration of human monocytes in vitro. TRO also consistently
decreased intimal macrophage accumulation in the diabetic and
nondiabetic mice. These findings support the concept that inhibition of
monocyte attachment and migration in the vessel by TRO may be one of
the mechanisms contributing to the reduction of atherogenesis. Although
it cannot be ruled out that the reduction of intimal monocytes in part
reflected the reduced lesion size induced by TRO treatment, this is
unlikely to be the sole explanation, because the relative intimal
monocyte/macrophage content is known to be greatest in the
early stages (smaller lesions) of atherosclerosis. In
any case, the antiatherosclerotic activity of TRO-induced PPAR
activation clearly prevailed over its hypothesized promotion of foam
cell formation via increased expression of the scavenger receptor
CD36.16
Unlike other PPAR
ligands, TRO has an
-tocopherol (vitamin E) moiety that theoretically could
contribute to its antiatherogenic activity through antioxidant
effects.34 Vitamin E has been
shown to suppress atherosclerosis in the apoE knockout
model, which develops advanced atherosclerotic
lesions.35 36
Whether the dose of vitamin E provided by TRO in the present study
is enough to impact lesion formation is doubtful. At 400 mg/kg TRO per
day,
LDLR-/-
mice received the equivalent of 8 IU of vitamin E, a dose much lower
than that reported to affect atherosclerosis or to
significantly protect LDL against
oxidation.35 36 37 38
Another line of evidence for the assumption that the effect of TRO on
lesion formation was not, to a significant degree, dependent on
antioxidant effects is provided by a parallel study demonstrating that
2 other PPAR
ligands, RSG and GW7845,which do not contain the
-tocopherol moiety, inhibited atherogenesis in the
aortic root of male
LDLR-/-
mice fed a high-fat, cholesterol-enriched
diet.39 In addition, the
recent Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) clinical trial in
humans did not show an effect of vitamin E on coronary artery
disease events or
mortality.40
In summary, given the absence of consistent major
metabolic changes present in diabetic and nondiabetic
mice, it is likely that TRO at least in part decreases early
atherosclerotic lesion formation through direct vascular effects. In
human subjects with diabetes, who have a high risk for coronary
disease, TRO improves insulin resistance and other proatherogenic
metabolic parameters, which may improve
cardiovascular risk. It is possible that some of the
vascular effects observed in our murine models may also be present
in humans. Although Li et
al39 and our data demonstrate
that PPAR
ligands suppress early atherosclerotic lesions, intimal
xanthomata do not inexorably progress to more advanced atherosclerotic
plaques; in fact, they often
regress.19 Therefore,
determining the effects of PPAR
ligands on more advanced
atherosclerotic lesions may prove to be a stronger predictor of their
potential clinical benefit. Nonetheless, the present results
indicate that an investigation of potential antiatherogenic effects of
PPAR
ligands is strongly
warranted.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 10, 2000; accepted December 1, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ricote M, Li AC, Willson TM, Kelly CJ, Glass CK. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature. 1998;391:7982.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Xin X, Yang S,
Kowalski J, Gerritsen ME. Peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor gamma ligands are potent inhibitors of
angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. J
Biol Chem. 1999;274:91169121.
4.
Jackson SM, Parhami
F, Xi XP, Berliner JA, Hsueh WA, Law RE, Demer LL. Peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor activators target
human endothelial cells to inhibit
leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:20942104.
5.
Marx N, Schonbeck U,
Lazar MA, Libby P, Plutzky J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor gamma activators inhibit gene expression and
migration in human vascular smooth muscle cells.
Circ Res. 1998;83:10971103.
6.
Law RE, Goetze S, Xi
XP, Jackson S, Kawano Y, Demer L, Fishbein MC, Meehan WP, Hsueh WA.
Expression and function of PPARgamma in rat and human vascular smooth
muscle cells. Circulation. 2000;101:13111318.
7. Tack CJ, Ong MK, Lutterman JA, Smits P. Insulin-induced vasodilatation and endothelial function in obesity/insulin resistance: effects of troglitazone. Diabetologia. 1998;41:569576.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Murakami T, Mizuno S, Ohsato K, Moriuchi I, Arai Y, Nio Y, Kaku B, Takahashi Y, Ohnaka M. Effects of troglitazone on frequency of coronary vasospastic-induced angina pectoris in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:9294. A8. Abstract.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Tanaka T, Itoh H, Do KK, Fukunaga Y, Arai H, Hosoda K. Activation of PPARgamma inhibits macrophage proliferation and migration: possible therapeutic effectiveness of thiazolidinediones on diabetic vascular complications. Diabetes. 1999;48(suppl 1):A30. Abstract.
10. Goetze S, Xi XP, Kawano H, Gotlibowski T, Fleck E, Hsueh WA, Law RE. PPAR gamma-ligands inhibit migration mediated by multiple chemoattractants in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;33:798806.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Law RE, Meehan WP, Xi XP, Graf K, Wuthrich DA, Coats W, Faxon D, Hsueh WA. Troglitazone inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth and intimal hyperplasia. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:18971905.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Igarashi M, Takeda Y, Ishibashi N, Takahashi K, Mori S, Tominaga M, Saito Y. Pioglitazone reduces smooth muscle cell density of rat carotid arterial intima induced by balloon catheterization. Horm Metab Res. 1997;29:444449.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Yoshimoto T, Naruse M, Shizume H, Naruse K, Tanabe A, Tanaka M, Tago K, Irie K, Muraki T, Demura H, et al. Vasculo-protective effects of insulin sensitizing agent pioglitazone in neointimal thickening and hypertensive vascular hypertrophy. Atherosclerosis. 1999;145:333340.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Takagi T, Akasaka
T, Yamamuro A, Honda Y, Hozumi T, Morioka S, Yoshida K. Troglitazone
reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent
implantation in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus:
a serial intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:15291535.
15.
Pasceri V, Wu HD,
Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Modulation of vascular inflammation in vitro and
in vivo by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma
activators.
Circulation. 2000;101:235238.
16. Tontonoz P, Nagy L, Alvarez JG, Thomazy VA, Evans RM. PPARgamma promotes monocyte/macrophage differentiation and uptake of oxidized LDL. Cell. 1998;93:241252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Saltiel AR, Olefsky JM. Thiazolidinediones in the treatment of insulin resistance and type II diabetes. Diabetes. 1996;45:16611669.[Abstract]
18.
Savage PJ.
Cardiovascular complications of diabetes mellitus: what
we know and what we need to know about their prevention.
Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:123126.
19.
Virmani R,
Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden
coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification
scheme for atherosclerotic lesions.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:12621275.
20.
Towler DA, Bidder
M, Latifi T, Coleman T, Semenkovich CF. Diet-induced diabetes
activates an osteogenic gene regulatory program in the aortas
of low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice.
J Biol Chem. 1998;273:3042730434.
21.
Merat S, Casanada
F, Sutphin M, Palinski W, Reaven PD. Western-type diets induce insulin
resistance and hyperinsulinemia in LDL
receptordeficient mice but do not increase aortic
atherosclerosis compared with normoinsulinemic mice in
which similar plasma cholesterol levels are achieved by a
fructose-rich diet. Arterioscler Thromb
Vasc Biol. 1999;19:12231230.
22.
Shi C, Lee WS,
Russell ME, Zhang D, Fletcher DL, Newell JB, Haber E.
Hypercholesterolemia exacerbates transplant
arteriosclerosis via increased
neointimal smooth muscle cell accumulation: studies in
apolipoprotein E knockout mice.
Circulation. 1997;96:27222728.
23.
Nakashima Y, Plump
AS, Raines EW, Breslow JL, Ross R. ApoE-deficient mice develop lesions
of all phases of atherosclerosis throughout the
arterial tree. Arterioscler
Thromb. 1994;14:133140.
24. Tangirala RK, Rubin EM, Palinski W. Quantitation of atherosclerosis in murine models: correlation between lesions in the aortic origin and in the entire aorta, and differences in the extent of lesions between sexes in LDL receptor-deficient and apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Lipid Res. 1995;36:23202328.[Abstract]
25. Kelley DE, Goodpaster B, Wing RR, Simoneau JA. Skeletal muscle fatty acid metabolism in association with insulin resistance, obesity, and weight loss. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:E1130E1141.
26. Suter SL, Nolan JJ, Wallace P, Gumbiner B, Olefsky JM. Metabolic effects of new oral hypoglycemic agent CS-045 in NIDDM subjects. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:193203.[Abstract]
27.
Fujiwara K,
Hayashi K, Matsuda H, Kubota E, Honda M, Ozawa Y, Saruta T. Altered
pressure-natriuresis in obese Zucker rats.
Hypertension. 1999;33:14701475.
28.
Sung BH, Izzo JL
Jr, Dandona P, Wilson MF. Vasodilatory effects of troglitazone improve
blood pressure at rest and during mental stress in type 2 diabetes
mellitus. Hypertension. 1999;34:8388.
29. Kawai T, Takei I, Oguma Y, Ohashi N, Tokui M, Oguchi S, Katsukawa F, Hirose H, Shimada A, Watanabe K, et al. Effects of troglitazone on fat distribution in the treatment of male type 2 diabetes. Metabolism. 1999;48:11021107.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Chen S, Noguchi Y, Izumida T, Tatebe J, Katayama S. A comparison of the hypotensive and hypoglycaemic actions of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, an AT1a antagonist and troglitazone. J Hypertens. 1996;14:13251330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Ross R. Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease. Am Heart J. 1999;138:S419S420.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Gu L, Okada Y, Clinton SK, Gerard C, Sukhova GK, Libby P, Rollins BJ. Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 reduces atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Mol Cell. 1998;2:275281.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Goetze S, Xi XP, Graf K, Fleck E, Hsueh WA, Law RE. Troglitazone inhibits angiotensin II-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 nuclear translocation and activation in vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 1999;452:277282.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Inoue I, Katayama S, Takahashi K, Negishi K, Miyazaki T, Sonoda M, Komoda T. Troglitazone has a scavenging effect on reactive oxygen species. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;235:113116.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Shaish A, George
J, Gilburd B, Keren P, Levkovitz H, Harats D. Dietary beta-carotene and
alpha-tocopherol combination does not inhibit atherogenesis
in an apoE-deficient mouse model.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:14701475.
36. Pratico D, Tangirala RK, Rader DJ, Rokach J, FitzGerald GA. Vitamin E suppresses isoprostane generation in vivo and reduces atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice. Nat Med. 1998;4:11891192.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Crawford RS, Kirk
EA, Rosenfeld ME, LeBoeuf RC, Chait A. Dietary antioxidants inhibit
development of fatty streak lesions in the LDL receptor-deficient
mouse. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
Biol. 1998;18:15061513.
38.
Bird DA, Tangirala
RK, Fruebis J, Steinberg D, Witztum JL, Palinski W. Effect of probucol
on LDL oxidation and atherosclerosis in LDL
receptor-deficient mice. J Lipid
Res. 1998;39:10791090.
39. Li AC, Brown KK, Silvestre MJ, Willson TM, Palinski W, Glass CK. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands inhibit development of atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:523531.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Yusuf S, Dagenais
G, Pogue J, Bosch J, Sleight P. Vitamin E supplementation and
cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: the Heart
Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators.
N Engl J Med. 2000;342:154160.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Nakaya, B. D. Summers, A. C. Nicholson, A. M. Gotto Jr., D. P. Hajjar, and J. Han Atherosclerosis in LDLR-Knockout Mice Is Inhibited, but Not Reversed, by the PPAR{gamma} Ligand Pioglitazone Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2009; 174(6): 2007 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yasuda, H. Kobayashi, M. Iwasa, I. Kawamura, S. Sumi, B. Narentuoya, T. Yamaki, H. Ushikoshi, K. Nishigaki, K. Nagashima, et al. Antidiabetic drug pioglitazone protects the heart via activation of PPAR-{gamma} receptors, PI3-kinase, Akt, and eNOS pathway in a rabbit model of myocardial infarction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): H1558 - H1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Collins, C. J. Lyon, X. Xia, J. Z. Liu, R. K. Tangirala, F. Yin, R. Boyadjian, A. Bikineyeva, D. Pratico, D. G. Harrison, et al. Age-Accelerated Atherosclerosis Correlates With Failure to Upregulate Antioxidant Genes Circ. Res., March 27, 2009; 104(6): e42 - e54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-L. Noh, Y. Hu, T.-S. Park, T. DiCioccio, A. J. Nichols, K. Okajima, S. Homma, and I. J. Goldberg Regulation of Plasma Fructose and Mortality in Mice by the Aldose Reductase Inhibitor Lidorestat J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2009; 328(2): 496 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ruan, F. Zheng, and Y. Guan PPARs and the kidney in metabolic syndrome Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): F1032 - F1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Z. Duan, M. G. Usher, and R. M. Mortensen Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma}-Mediated Effects in the Vasculature Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 283 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Ohman, Y. Shen, C. I. Obimba, A. P. Wright, M. Warnock, D. A. Lawrence, and D. T. Eitzman Visceral Adipose Tissue Inflammation Accelerates Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Circulation, February 12, 2008; 117(6): 798 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sena, I. R. Rasmussen, A. R. Wende, A. P. McQueen, H. A. Theobald, N. Wilde, R. O. Pereira, S. E. Litwin, J. P. Berger, and E. D. Abel Cardiac Hypertrophy Caused by Peroxisome Proliferator- Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist Treatment Occurs Independently of Changes in Myocardial Insulin Signaling Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 6047 - 6053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Thorp, G. Kuriakose, Y. M. Shah, F. J. Gonzalez, and I. Tabas Pioglitazone Increases Macrophage Apoptosis and Plaque Necrosis in Advanced Atherosclerotic Lesions of Nondiabetic Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Null Mice Circulation, November 6, 2007; 116(19): 2182 - 2190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gustafson, A. Hammarstedt, C. X. Andersson, and U. Smith Inflamed Adipose Tissue: A Culprit Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome and Atherosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2007; 27(11): 2276 - 2283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zadelaar, R. Kleemann, L. Verschuren, J. de Vries-Van der Weij, J. van der Hoorn, H. M. Princen, and T. Kooistra Mouse Models for Atherosclerosis and Pharmaceutical Modifiers Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(8): 1706 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M Hartge, T. Unger, and U. Kintscher The endothelium and vascular inflammation in diabetes Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 84 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hartvigsen, C. J. Binder, L. F. Hansen, A. Rafia, J. Juliano, S. Horkko, D. Steinberg, W. Palinski, J. L. Witztum, and A. C. Li A Diet-Induced Hypercholesterolemic Murine Model to Study Atherogenesis Without Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2007; 27(4): 878 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Crossno Jr., C. V. Garat, J. E. B. Reusch, K. G. Morris, E. C. Dempsey, I. F. McMurtry, K. R. Stenmark, and D. J. Klemm Rosiglitazone attenuates hypoxia-induced pulmonary arterial remodeling Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): L885 - L897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Benton, A. Powers, L. Eiselein, R. Fitch, D. Wilson, A. C. Villablanca, and J. C. Rutledge Hyperglycemia and loss of ovarian hormones mediate atheroma formation through endothelial layer disruption and increased permeability Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): R723 - R730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Michalik, J. Auwerx, J. P. Berger, V. K. Chatterjee, C. K. Glass, F. J. Gonzalez, P. A. Grimaldi, T. Kadowaki, M. A. Lazar, S. O'Rahilly, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. LXI. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 726 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wu, R. Vikramadithyan, S. Yu, C. Pau, Y. Hu, I. J. Goldberg, and H. M. Dansky Addition of dietary fat to cholesterol in the diets of LDL receptor knockout mice: effects on plasma insulin, lipoproteins, and atherosclerosis J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 2215 - 2222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Imayama, T. Ichiki, K. Inanaga, H. Ohtsubo, K. Fukuyama, H. Ono, Y. Hashiguchi, and K. Sunagawa Telmisartan downregulates angiotensin II type 1 receptor through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2006; 72(1): 184 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B Patle, J. A De Lemos, K. L Wyne, and D. K McGuire Thiazolidinediones and risk for atherosclerosis: pleiotropic effects of PPAR{gamma} agonism Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, September 1, 2006; 3(2): 65 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Estrada-Smith, A. R. Collins, X. Wang, C. Crockett, L. Castellani, A. J. Lusis, and R. C. Davis Impact of Chromosome 2 Obesity Loci on Cardiovascular Complications of Insulin Resistance in LDL Receptor-Deficient C57BL/6 Mice. Diabetes, August 1, 2006; 55(8): 2265 - 2271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nigro, N. Osman, A. M. Dart, and P. J. Little Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2006; 27(3): 242 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Esposito, M. Ciotola, D. Carleo, B. Schisano, F. Saccomanno, F. C. Sasso, D. Cozzolino, R. Assaloni, D. Merante, A. Ceriello, et al. Effect of Rosiglitazone on Endothelial Function and Inflammatory Markers in Patients With the Metabolic Syndrome Diabetes Care, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 1071 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ogawa, T. Nomiyama, T. Nakamachi, E. B. Heywood, J. F. Stone, J. P. Berger, R. E. Law, and D. Bruemmer Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Suppresses Telomerase Activity in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Circ. Res., April 14, 2006; 98(7): e50 - e59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Meisner, D. Walcher, F. Gizard, X. Kapfer, R. Huber, A. Noak, L. Sunder-Plassmann, H. Bach, C. Haug, M. Bachem, et al. Effect of Rosiglitazone Treatment on Plaque Inflammation and Collagen Content in Nondiabetic Patients: Data From a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(4): 845 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lim, C. J. Jin, M. Kim, S. S. Chung, H. S. Park, I. K. Lee, C. T. Lee, Y. M. Cho, H. K. Lee, and K. S. Park PPAR{gamma} Gene Transfer Sustains Apoptosis, Inhibits Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation, and Reduces Neointima Formation After Balloon Injury in Rats Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(4): 808 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Barish Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Liver X Receptors in Atherosclerosis and Immunity J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 690 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Howarth, W. B. Wiehler, M. Pannirselvam, Y. Jiang, J. P. Berger, D. Severson, T. J. Anderson, and C. R. Triggle A Nonthiazolidinedione Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Agonist Reverses Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetic (db/db-/-) Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2006; 316(1): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Blaschke, Y. Takata, E. Caglayan, R. E. Law, and W. A. Hsueh Obesity, Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor, and Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetes Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 28 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Soumian, R Gibbs, A Davies, and C Albrecht mRNA expression of genes involved in lipid efflux and matrix degradation in occlusive and ectatic atherosclerotic disease J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2005; 58(12): 1255 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, K. Schmelzer, T.-S. Lee, X. Fang, Y. Zhu, A. A. Spector, S. Gill, C. Morisseau, B. D. Hammock, et al. The antiinflammatory effect of laminar flow: The role of PPAR{gamma}, epoxyeicosatrienoic acids, and soluble epoxide hydrolase PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16747 - 16752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Camejo Differential Antiatherogenic Effects of PPAR{alpha} Versus PPAR{gamma} Agonists: Should We Be Surprised? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1763 - 1764. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hennuyer, A. Tailleux, G. Torpier, H. Mezdour, J.-C. Fruchart, B. Staels, and C. Fievet PPAR{alpha}, but not PPAR{gamma}, Activators Decrease Macrophage-Laden Atherosclerotic Lesions in a Nondiabetic Mouse Model of Mixed Dyslipidemia Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1897 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Calkin, J. M. Forbes, C. M. Smith, M. Lassila, M. E. Cooper, K. A. Jandeleit-Dahm, and T. J. Allen Rosiglitazone Attenuates Atherosclerosis in a Model of Insulin Insufficiency Independent of Its Metabolic Effects Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1903 - 1909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Polikandriotis, L. J. Mazzella, H. L. Rupnow, and C. M. Hart Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Ligands Stimulate Endothelial Nitric Oxide Production Through Distinct Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Dependent Mechanisms Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1810 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. R. Babaev, P. G. Yancey, S. V. Ryzhov, V. Kon, M. D. Breyer, M. A. Magnuson, S. Fazio, and M. F. Linton Conditional Knockout of Macrophage PPAR{gamma}Increases Atherosclerosis in C57BL/6 and Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Deficient Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2005; 25(8): 1647 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.R. Langenfeld, T. Forst, C. Hohberg, P. Kann, G. Lubben, T. Konrad, S.D. Fullert, C. Sachara, and A. Pfutzner Pioglitazone Decreases Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Independently of Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results From a Controlled Randomized Study Circulation, May 17, 2005; 111(19): 2525 - 2531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Clough, D. J. Schneider, B. E. Sobel, M. F. White, M. P. Wadsworth, and D. J. Taatjes Attenuation of Accumulation of Neointimal Lipid by Pioglitazone in Mice Genetically Deficient in Insulin Receptor Substrate-2 and Apolipoprotein E J. Histochem. Cytochem., May 1, 2005; 53(5): 603 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. McMahon, J. Plutzky, E. Daher, T. Bhattacharyya, G. Grunberger, and M. F. DiCarli Effect of a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist on Myocardial Blood Flow in Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, May 1, 2005; 28(5): 1145 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Xiang, R. K. Peters, S. L. Kjos, C. Ochoa, A. Marroquin, J. Goico, S. Tan, C. Wang, S. P. Azen, C.-r. Liu, et al. Effect of Thiazolidinedione Treatment on Progression of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Premenopausal Women at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 1986 - 1991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Makowski, K. C. Brittingham, J. M. Reynolds, J. Suttles, and G. S. Hotamisligil The Fatty Acid-binding Protein, aP2, Coordinates Macrophage Cholesterol Trafficking and Inflammatory Activity: MACROPHAGE EXPRESSION OF aP2 IMPACTS PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR {gamma} AND I{kappa}B KINASE ACTIVITIES J. Biol. Chem., April 1, 2005; 280(13): 12888 - 12895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hwang, D. J. Kleinhenz, B. Lassegue, K. K. Griendling, S. Dikalov, and C. M. Hart Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} ligands regulate endothelial membrane superoxide production Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): C899 - C905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Schopfer, Y. Lin, P. R. S. Baker, T. Cui, M. Garcia-Barrio, J. Zhang, K. Chen, Y. E. Chen, and B. A. Freeman Nitrolinoleic acid: An endogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} ligand PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2340 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Castellani, P. Gargalovic, M. Febbraio, S. Charugundla, M.-L. Jien, and A. J. Lusis Mechanisms mediating insulin resistance in transgenic mice overexpressing mouse apolipoprotein A-II J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2377 - 2387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Li and C. K. Glass PPAR- and LXR-dependent pathways controlling lipid metabolism and the development of atherosclerosis J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2161 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Guan Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Family and Its Relationship to Renal Complications of the Metabolic Syndrome J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 2801 - 2815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ragolia, T. Palaia, T. B. Koutrouby, and J. K. Maesaka Inhibition of cell cycle progression and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells by prostaglandin D2 synthase: resistance in diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): C1273 - C1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wu, Y. Zhang, N. Wang, L. Davis, G. Yang, X. Wang, Y. Zhu, M. D. Breyer, and Y. Guan Liver X receptor-{alpha} mediates cholesterol efflux in glomerular mesangial cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): F886 - F895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Walcher and N. Marx Insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease: the role of PPAR{gamma} activators beyond their anti-diabetic action Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, October 1, 2004; 1(2): 76 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Akaike, W. Che, N.-L. Marmarosh, S. Ohta, M. Osawa, B. Ding, B. C. Berk, C. Yan, and J.-i. Abe The Hinge-Helix 1 Region of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}1 (PPAR{gamma}1) Mediates Interaction with Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 and PPAR{gamma}1 Transcriptional Activation: Involvement in Flow-Induced PPAR{gamma} Activation in Endothelial Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2004; 24(19): 8691 - 8704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Z. Al-Shali, A. A. House, A. J.G. Hanley, H. M.R. Khan, S. B. Harris, B. Zinman, M. Mamakeesick, A. Fenster, J. D. Spence, and R. A. Hegele Genetic Variation in PPARG Encoding Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Associated With Carotid Atherosclerosis Stroke, September 1, 2004; 35(9): 2036 - 2040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Desvergne, L. Michalik, and W. Wahli Be Fit or Be Sick: Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Are Down the Road Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2004; 18(6): 1321 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Marx, H. Duez, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Atherogenesis: Regulators of Gene Expression in Vascular Cells Circ. Res., May 14, 2004; 94(9): 1168 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Sidhu, Z. Kaposzta, H. S. Markus, and J. C. Kaski Effect of Rosiglitazone on Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression in Coronary Artery Disease Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(5): 930 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ricote, A. F. Valledor, and C. K. Glass Decoding Transcriptional Programs Regulated by PPARs and LXRs in the Macrophage: Effects on Lipid Homeostasis, Inflammation, and Atherosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(2): 230 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lin, X. Zhu, F. L. Mclntee, H. Xiao, J. Zhang, M. Fu, and Y. E. Chen Interferon Regulatory Factor-1 Mediates PPAR{gamma}-Induced Apoptosis in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(2): 257 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Havel Update on Adipocyte Hormones: Regulation of Energy Balance and Carbohydrate/Lipid Metabolism Diabetes, February 1, 2004; 53(90001): S143 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Hsueh and D. Bruemmer Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease Hypertension, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 297 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Sidhu, D. Cowan, and J.-C. Kaski The effects of rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, on markers of endothelial cell activation, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels in non-diabetic coronary artery disease patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 19, 2003; 42(10): 1757 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Phillips, K. G. Barringhaus, J. M. Sanders, Z. Yang, M. Chen, S. Hesselbacher, A. C. Czarnik, K. Ley, J. Nadler, and I. J. Sarembock Rosiglitazone Reduces the Accelerated Neointima Formation After Arterial Injury in a Mouse Injury Model of Type 2 Diabetes Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1994 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Satoh, Y. Ogawa, T. Usui, T. Tagami, S. Kono, H. Uesugi, H. Sugiyama, A. Sugawara, K. Yamada, A. Shimatsu, et al. Antiatherogenic Effect of Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Irrespective of the Responsiveness to Its Antidiabetic Effect Diabetes Care, September 1, 2003; 26(9): 2493 - 2499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Lyon, R. E. Law, and W. A. Hsueh Minireview: Adiposity, Inflammation, and Atherogenesis Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2195 - 2200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Lee, P. Olson, and R. M. Evans Minireview: Lipid Metabolism, Metabolic Diseases, and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2201 - 2207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. de Dios, D. Bruemmer, R. J. Dilley, M. E. Ivey, G. L.R. Jennings, R. E. Law, and P. J. Little Inhibitory Activity of Clinical Thiazolidinedione Peroxisome Proliferator Activating Receptor-{gamma} Ligands Toward Internal Mammary Artery, Radial Artery, and Saphenous Vein Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation Circulation, May 27, 2003; 107(20): 2548 - 2550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. T. Bloomgarden Inflammation and Insulin Resistance Diabetes Care, May 1, 2003; 26(5): 1619 - 1623. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Hannan, R. J. Dilley, S. T. de Dios, and P. J. Little Troglitazone Stimulates Repair of the Endothelium and Inhibits Neointimal Formation in Denuded Rat Aorta Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 762 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.A. Argmann, C.G. Sawyez, C.J. McNeil, R.A. Hegele, and M.W. Huff Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma and Retinoid X Receptor Results in Net Depletion of Cellular Cholesteryl Esters in Macrophages Exposed to Oxidized Lipoproteins Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2003; 23(3): 475 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Marx, J. Froehlich, L. Siam, J. Ittner, G. Wierse, A. Schmidt, H. Scharnagl, V. Hombach, and W. Koenig Antidiabetic PPAR{gamma}-Activator Rosiglitazone Reduces MMP-9 Serum Levels in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2003; 23(2): 283 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Calnek, L. Mazzella, S. Roser, J. Roman, and C. M. Hart Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Ligands Increase Release of Nitric Oxide From Endothelial Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 52 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Cunard, D. DiCampli, D. C. Archer, J. L. Stevenson, M. Ricote, C. K. Glass, and C. J. Kelly WY14,643, a PPAR{alpha} Ligand, Has Profound Effects on Immune Responses In Vivo J. Immunol., December 15, 2002; 169(12): 6806 - 6812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ishibashi, K. Egashira, K.-i. Hiasa, S. Inoue, W. Ni, Q. Zhao, M. Usui, S. Kitamoto, T. Ichiki, and A. Takeshita Antiinflammatory and Antiarteriosclerotic Effects of Pioglitazone Hypertension, November 1, 2002; 40(5): 687 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kako, M. Masse, L.-S. Huang, A. R. Tall, and I. J. Goldberg Lipoprotein lipase deficiency and CETP in streptozotocin-treated apoB-expressing mice J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 872 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Elangbam, T. A. Brodie, H. Roger Brown, J. B. Nold, T. J. Raczniak, R. D. Tyler, R. M. Lightfoot, and H. G. Wall Vascular Effects of GI262570X (PPAR-{gamma} agonist) in the Brown Adipose Tissue of Han Wistar Rats: A Review of 1-month, 13-week, 27-week and 2-year Oral Toxicity Studies Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2002; 30(4): 420 - 426. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Joseph, E. McKilligin, L. Pei, M. A. Watson, A. R. Collins, B. A. Laffitte, M. Chen, G. Noh, J. Goodman, G. N. Hagger, et al. Synthetic LXR ligand inhibits the development of atherosclerosis in mice PNAS, May 28, 2002; 99(11): 7604 - 7609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Barbier, I. P. Torra, Y. Duguay, C. Blanquart, J.-C. Fruchart, C. Glineur, and B. Staels Pleiotropic Actions of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Lipid Metabolism and Atherosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2002; 22(5): 717 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Cunard, M. Ricote, D. DiCampli, D. C. Archer, D. A. Kahn, C. K. Glass, and C. J. Kelly Regulation of Cytokine Expression by Ligands of Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors J. Immunol., March 15, 2002; 168(6): 2795 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Walczak and P. Tontonoz PPARadigms and PPARadoxes: expanding roles for PPAR{gamma} in the control of lipid metabolism J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 177 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Inzucchi Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Scientific Review JAMA, January 16, 2002; 287(3): 360 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Staels The clinical significance of PPAR{alpha} and {gamma} agonism The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, January 1, 2002; 2(1_suppl): S28 - S31. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Hsueh and R. E. Law PPAR{gamma} and Atherosclerosis: Effects on Cell Growth and Movement Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2001; 21(12): 1891 - 1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vosper, L. Patel, T. L. Graham, G. A. Khoudoli, A. Hill, C. H. Macphee, I. Pinto, S. A. Smith, K. E. Suckling, C. R. Wolf, et al. The Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor delta Promotes Lipid Accumulation in Human Macrophages J. Biol. Chem., November 16, 2001; 276(47): 44258 - 44265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Murata, Y. Hata, T. Ishibashi, S. Kim, W. A. Hsueh, R. E. Law, and D. R. Hinton Response of Experimental Retinal Neovascularization to Thiazolidinediones Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 2001; 119(5): 709 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Glass Antiatherogenic Effects of Thiazolidinediones? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2001; 21(3): 295 - 296. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |