This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jones, S. P. Articles by Lefer, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jones, S. P. Articles by Lefer, D. J. Related Collections Acute myocardial infarction Cardio-renal physiology/pathophysiology Congestive Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide Animal models of human disease

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2001;21:2059.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Pretreatment With Simvastatin Attenuates Myocardial Dysfunction After Ischemia and Chronic Reperfusion

Steven P. Jones; Steven D. Trocha; David J. Lefer

From the Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, La.

Reprint requests to David J. Lefer, PhD, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, LSU Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA 71130. E-mail dlefer{at}lsuhsc.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
We have previously demonstrated that simvastatin attenuates myocardial cell necrosis after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion via induction of endothelial cell NO synthase. However, it remains unknown whether the cardioprotective effects of statins can persist after extended periods of reperfusion. Furthermore, it is unknown whether simvastatin therapy can attenuate postischemic cardiac dysfunction. Pretreatment with simvastatin attenuated myocardial injury after 30 minutes of myocardial ischemia and 24 hours of reperfusion. However, the protective effects are not recognized unless simvastatin is given at least 3 hours before myocardial ischemia. Subsequently, we pretreated mice with vehicle or simvastatin and subjected the mice to 30 minutes of myocardial ischemia and 6 months of reperfusion. Myocardial infarct size (percentage of left ventricle) was significantly reduced by 51% in the simvastatin-treated group compared with the vehicle-treated group. Left ventricular diastolic and systolic dilatation was significantly (P<0.05) reduced in simvastatin-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated mice. Additionally, the decrement in fractional shortening after 6 months of reperfusion was minimized in simvastatin-treated mice (P=NS versus baseline) compared with vehicle-treated mice (P<0.05 versus baseline). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was significantly (P<0.01) elevated in vehicle-treated mice (21±4 mm Hg) but not simvastatin-treated mice (5±2 mm Hg) compared with baseline values. These data demonstrate that simvastatin treatment before myocardial ischemia attenuates infarct size and preserves myocardial function after chronic reperfusion in mice.

Key Words: inflammation • nitric oxide • infarct • contractile function

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Elevated serum cholesterol levels are a known risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, are a class of drugs particularly beneficial in combating this risk factor. Therapeutic doses of statins potently reduce serum cholesterol levels in humans.¹ Furthermore, statins have been shown to decrease coronary heart disease mortality.² Statins have also been shown to improve endothelial function in humans with elevated serum cholesterol levels.³ It has become readily apparent through experimental and clinical data that additional benefits of statin therapy may occur independently of cholesterol reduction.^4,5

Previous experimental studies of statins in ischemia/reperfusion injury have clearly demonstrated cardioprotective^6–8 and neuroprotective⁹ effects despite unaltered serum cholesterol levels. The beneficial mechanism potentiated by statins in these studies appeared to be dependent on enhanced release of NO from the coronary/cerebral endothelium. Experimental studies have revealed that acute simvastatin therapy increases the half-life of endothelial NO synthase mRNA and activates the protein kinase Akt pathway, resulting in enhanced NO production. The protective effects of NO have been demonstrated in previous experimental studies in the heart and other organs.^10–16

Despite evidence supporting acute cardioprotective effects of statins in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, it is unknown whether these effects persist in a chronically reperfused animal model. More specifically, do these effects translate into improvement in ventricular function parameters in vivo? In the present study, we investigated whether simvastatin treatment before myocardial ischemia would confer any sustained cardiovascular benefits by using a murine model of in vivo ischemia and reperfusion. We also established the time frame of pretreatment in which acute cytoprotective effects were evident.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Mice
Two- to 3-month-old male C57BL/6 mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Me) were used in all experimental groups. Twenty-six mice were randomized to receive either saline vehicle (200 µL IP, n=15) or activated⁶ simvastatin (1 mg/kg IP, n=11) administered 18 hours before myocardial ischemia and chronic reperfusion. Sham-operated mice (n=5) were used to account for possible chronic effects related to the surgical protocol. All mice survived the protocol except for 3 vehicle-treated mice and 2 simvastatin-treated mice. An additional group of 37 mice was used to identify a time course of pretreatment with simvastatin. These mice were reperfused for 24 hours instead of 6 months. None of the functional data in the present study involves these "acutely" reperfused groups of mice. All animal experiments complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and with state and federal regulations.

Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Protocol
The surgical protocol and infarct size determination were performed similar to methods described previously.^7,8,17–22 Briefly, the mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injections of ketamine (50 mg/kg) and pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg). Subsequent to anesthesia, the mice were orally intubated with polyethylene-90 (PE-90) tubing, connected via loose junction to a rodent ventilator (model 683, Harvard Apparatus) set at a tidal volume of 1.5 mL and a rate of 120 breaths per minute, and supplemented with oxygen. Body temperature was maintained at 37°C by using a rectal thermometer and infrared heating lamp. A median sternotomy was performed, and the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was visualized and ligated with 7-0 silk suture mounted on a tapered needle (BV-1, Ethicon). Ischemia was confirmed by the appearance of hypokinesis and pallor distal to the occlusion. After 30 minutes of LAD occlusion, the ligature was removed, and reperfusion was visually confirmed. The chest wall was closed, and the mice were given butorphanol tartrate (0.1 mg/kg) and allowed to recover in a temperature-controlled area.

Evaluation of Arterial and LV Hemodynamics
To assess the closed-chest hemodynamic status of both groups of mice after 6 months of reperfusion, a 1.4F Millar (SPR-671) pressure transduction catheter was inserted similar to methods described previously.²³ Mice were anesthetized with ketamine (50 mg/kg IP) and pentobarbital (50 mg/kg IP) and supplemented with oxygen via a nasal cone. The right common carotid artery was isolated, and the catheter was inserted and advanced to the aorta. Data were recorded for 10 seconds. Offline assessment of these data yielded systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate (HR). The catheter was then advanced through the aortic valve into the left ventricle (LV). Data were recorded for 10 seconds. Subsequent offline evaluation provided LV systolic pressure, LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), LV developed pressure, and the first derivative of the LV pressure curve (minimum and maximum dP/dt). Data for each animal were calculated from at least 10 seconds of chart recording (arithmetic mean of at least 50 cardiac cycles).

Echocardiographic Assessment of the LV
In vivo transthoracic echocardiography of the LV with use of a 15-MHz linear array transducer (15L8) interfaced with a Sequoia C256 (Acuson) was performed as described previously.¹⁸ Ventricular parameters were measured by using the leading-edge technique. M-mode (sweep speed 200 mm/s) echocardiograms were captured from parasternal, short-axis, and long-axis 2D views of the LV at the midpapillary level. LV end-diastolic diameters (LVEDDs), LV end-systolic diameters (LVESDs), aortic diameter (AoD), aortic velocity time integral (AoVTI), and HR were measured before ischemia and at 6 months of reperfusion. For measurement of the AoVTI, angle correction of the Doppler signal was incorporated to account for the difference between the ultrasound beam and aortic flow (90°). LV percent fractional shortening (LV%FS) was calculated according to the following equation: LV%FS=[(LVEDD-LVESD)/LVEDD]x100. Stroke volume was calculated from the product of the aortic cross-sectional area, ie, x(AoD/2)², and the AoVTI. Cardiac output was calculated from the product of the stroke volume and HR. The cardiac output values were corrected for the weights of the animals (in microliters per minute per gram). Anterior and posterior wall dimensions were also assessed in diastole and systole in all groups of mice. All data were calculated from 10 independent cardiac cycles per experiment.

Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed by a Student unpaired t test with the use of StatView 4.5 (Abacus Concepts). Values are reported as mean±SEM, with significance set at P<0.05.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Myocardial Infarct Size
To ascertain the onset of the protective effects of simvastatin, we performed a time course of simvastatin pretreatment in which a separate group of mice was given vehicle or 1 mg/kg simvastatin before 30 minutes of myocardial ischemia (Figure 1). These data demonstrate that pretreatment with simvastatin as late as 3 hours before the onset of myocardial ischemia exerted protective effects. However, pretreatment with simvastatin 1 hour before myocardial ischemia did not confer any demonstrable cardioprotective effects.

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Time course of simvastatin pretreatment before 30 minutes of LAD occlusion and 24 hours of reperfusion. Mice were given 1 mg/kg simvastatin at the times indicated before myocardial ischemia. These data demonstrate that the protective effects of simvastatin are not apparent if the pretreatment interval is too short (1 hour). *P<0.05 compared with vehicle.

In the chronically reperfused group of mice, surviving mice were euthanized, and the amount of necrosis per LV was determined after 6 months. As shown in Figure 2, it was clear that hearts from mice that received simvastatin (3.8±0.8% infarct per LV, n=7) before myocardial ischemia maintained less (P<0.05) injury than did hearts from vehicle-treated mice (7.8±0.9% infarct per LV, n=11). In addition, LV weights were not significantly different between the vehicle- and simvastatin-treated groups when expressed as raw values or when corrected for body weight (data not shown).

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Myocardial infarct size after 30 minutes of LAD occlusion and 6 months of reperfusion. Wild-type mice were given either vehicle or 1 mg/kg simvastatin 18 hours before myocardial ischemia. Data indicate the area of necrosis with respect to the LV. Simvastatin treatment significantly attenuated the extent of myocardial necrosis after ischemia and reperfusion. *P<0.05 compared with vehicle.

Arterial and LV Hemodynamics
Insertion of a 1.4F pressure catheter through the carotid artery into the aorta and LV yielded in vivo hemodynamics in closed-chest mice. None of the arterial hemodynamic parameters were significantly different between the 2 groups or compared with baseline (Table 1). This also demonstrates that the dose of simvastatin used in the present study does not alter arterial hemodynamics under baseline conditions. Despite these similarities between the groups in arterial hemodynamics, LVEDP was significantly elevated in the vehicle-treated group but not the statin-treated group after chronic reperfusion (Figure 3). This was not associated with an alteration in LV systolic pressure in either group (not shown). However, the LV developed pressure was significantly depressed in the vehicle-treated group compared with the statin-treated group (not shown).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Body Weight and General Hemodynamics

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. LVEDP before myocardial ischemia (baseline) and after 6 months of reperfusion (6 months after myocardial ischemia [MI]) in wild-type mice treated with vehicle or simvastatin or with sham operation. LVEDP was significantly elevated (**P<0.01 vs baseline) in the vehicle-treated mice. However, simvastatin treatment abolished this rise in LVEDP.

Echocardiographic Assessment of LV Function and Dimensions
Using transthoracic echocardiography, we assessed closed-chest in vivo ventricular function and dimensions before ischemia and after chronic reperfusion in sham-operated mice and in mice given vehicle or simvastatin. Table 2 contains ventricular dimensions of systole and diastole in all groups of mice. Although vehicle- and simvastatin-treated mice experienced significant ventricular dilatation at 6 months after myocardial ischemia, the percent change in diastolic and systolic diameters from baseline was significantly greater in the vehicle-treated group compared with the simvastatin-treated group (Table 2). In addition, the percent fractional shortening in simvastatin-treated hearts was maintained near baseline levels, whereas the vehicle-treated hearts suffered a small but significant reduction in fractional shortening (Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. LV Dimensions and Function

Regional wall dimensions and function were also assessed in sham-operated, vehicle-treated, and simvastatin-treated mice after 6 months of reperfusion (Table 3). Anterior wall thickening was significantly depressed in vehicle- and simvastatin-treated mice after 6 months of reperfusion compared with sham-operated mice. The thickness of the posterior wall in diastole and systole was significantly greater in the vehicle-treated mice compared with the sham-operated mice. Furthermore, the ratio of the anterior wall thickness to posterior wall thickness was significantly diminished in vehicle-treated mice compared with sham-operated mice.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. LV Regional Wall Dimensions

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
The present study demonstrates that mice subjected to coronary artery occlusion followed by chronic reperfusion have significant long-standing cardiac dysfunction. More important, these data provide evidence that a single dose of simvastatin can at least partially preserve normal cardiac function in the chronically reperfused mouse myocardium. It is important to consider the effects of an agent after more prolonged periods of reperfusion to ascertain whether the acute cytoprotective effects would be associated with any improvement in myocardial function. This point is particularly important because previous studies have clearly demonstrated that some acutely cardioprotective agents do not confer sustained cardiac benefits.^24–26 Therefore, the present study addresses this vital issue as it relates to the cardioprotective effects of simvastatin.

Ever since the first demonstration of the protective effects of statins in a model of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury,⁹ we have documented similar findings in the myocardium.^6–8 These studies were largely driven by in vitro evidence demonstrating an important effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on endothelial NO synthase.^27–30 In addition to the attenuation of ischemia/reperfusion injury in the brain⁹ and heart,^6–8 statins have also been shown to promote angiogenesis in ischemic limbs of rabbits,³² attenuate leukocyte–endothelial cell interactions,^7,8,33 and retard the progression of atherosclerosis^34,35 without reducing serum cholesterol levels. The protective effects of statins in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion models have been demonstrated in normocholesterolemic rats,⁶ normocholesterolemic mice,⁸ hypercholesterolemic mice,⁸ and diabetic mice.⁷ The protective effects in all of these studies are largely mediated by induction of endothelial cell–derived NO, which is an essential cardioprotective¹⁵ and anti-inflammatory factor.¹⁶

Despite consistent demonstrations of a reduction in myocardial reperfusion injury with statin treatment, the functional consequences of this protection remained unknown until now. Although the preservation of function in the statin group is significant in some categories, it is marginal or nonexistent in others. Moreover, the single preischemia dose did not completely abolish ventricular dilatation or the diminution of function after 6 months of reperfusion. This finding is not entirely surprising because statin treatment does not completely block myocardial necrosis in the present study or other studies of acute myocardial ischemia/reperfusion.^6–8 It is critical to indicate important differences in the method of reporting the 2 groups of infarct sizes. In Figure 1, we report the myocardial infarct size with respect to the area at risk, whereas in Figure 2, it is reported with respect to the LV. The expression of infarct size with respect to the area at risk after 6 months of reperfusion was not possible because of the inability to locate the exact position of the previous ligation. The religation is necessary to counterstain the nonischemic zone and delineate it from the area at risk. If data from the acutely reperfused group (Figure 1) were expressed with respect to the LV, the values would still be significantly greater than the values for the chronically reperfused group (Figure 2). However, this difference could likely be due to scar formation and the remodeling process of the postischemic myocardium.

Although simvastatin did not completely abolish the deleterious functional consequences of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion in the present study, several important parameters of cardiovascular function were protected. It is clear that the extent of myocardial infarction was significantly attenuated in the simvastatin group compared with the vehicle-treated group. However, one of the most striking functional observations is the elevated LVEDP in the vehicle group that was not observed in the statin group. The augmented LVEDP in the vehicle group likely results from alterations in myocardial compliance that are due to the larger area of myocardial infarction. Ultimately, when the finding of elevated LVEDP is combined with a normal cardiac output, it appears that mice receiving vehicle exhibit a compensated form of heart failure. Another possibly related explanation of the elevated LVEDP could involve alterations in regional wall function. The data in Table 3 may indicate that there is compensatory hypertrophy of the posterior (noninfarcted) wall. Furthermore, the ratio of the anterior wall to the posterior wall is significantly lower in the vehicle-treated mice compared with the sham-operated (and simvastatin-treated) mice. These findings likely result from the infarct-reducing effect of simvastatin. Although simvastatin may beneficially affect the remodeling process in this model (independent of infarct size reduction), this is probably unlikely because of the transient administration of simvastatin that we used. However, this important question cannot be answered in the present study.

Preservation of normal LVEDP was accompanied by a less impressive effect on ventricular dimensions. Both groups of mice underwent a significant degree of ventricular dilatation after the infarct. However, the change in LV diameter from baseline was more pronounced in the vehicle-treated group in diastole and in systole. Although the vehicle-treated group experienced a significant decrement in fractional shortening, statin therapy virtually abolished this defect. The attenuated dilatation and preservation of fractional shortening in the statin group likely resulted from the smaller area of necrosis after the infarct. In any event, simvastatin therapy before myocardial ischemia exerts significant and persistent cardiovascular protective effects.

A major limitation of the present study is the use of otherwise healthy animals to investigate the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction. Most cardiac patients suffer from a variety of risk factors (eg, hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia) that significantly reduce endothelial cell NO synthase function. It may not be possible to realize a significant benefit in the setting of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion in such individuals. In addition, we pretreated mice with simvastatin before the onset of myocardial ischemia, which is not usually possible in humans. Furthermore, we also found that the protective effect of simvastatin was not apparent if the mice were treated as late as 1 hour before myocardial ischemia. However, our results do provide insights into the mechanism responsible for the significant reduction in cardiac disease events in statin-treated patients.

In summary, the present study demonstrates that simvastatin treatment before myocardial ischemia attenuates ventricular dilatation, preserves ventricular function, and abrogates the elevation in end-diastolic pressure after long-term reperfusion. Future studies should evaluate the effect of chronic statin therapy before and/or after myocardial ischemia to ascertain any added benefits or possible deleterious effects. The present and future findings may have profound implications for the future treatment of myocardial injury and preservation of function after ischemia.

	Acknowledgments

 
This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 HL-60849 and P01 DK-43785, Dr Lefer). The authors acknowledge Willis-Knighton Medical Center (Shreveport, La), DeRoyal Surgical (Powell, Tenn), and Ethicon Surgical (Somerville, NJ) for their generous donation of surgical equipment.

Received July 31, 2001; accepted September 20, 2001.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) Group. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4,444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Lancet. 1994; 344: 1383–1389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Shepherd J, Cobbe S, Ford I, Isles C, Lorimer A, MacFarlane P, McKillop J, Packard C. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 1301–1307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. O’Driscoll G, Green D, Taylor RR. Simvastatin, an HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, improves endothelial function within 1 month. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1126–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Lefer AM, Scalia R, Lefer DJ. Vascular effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) unrelated to cholesterol lowering: new concepts for cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 49: 281–287.[Free Full Text]
5. Wilson SH, Simari RD, Best PJM, Peterson TE, Lerman LO, Aviram M, Nath KA, Holmes DRJr, Lerman A. Simvastatin preserves coronary endothelial function in hypercholesterolemia in the absence of lipid lowering. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 122–128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Lefer A, Campbell B, Shin Y-K, Scalia R, Hayward R, Lefer D. Simvastatin preserves the ischemic-reperfused myocardium in normocholesterolemic rat hearts. Circulation. 1999; 100: 178–184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Lefer DJ, Scalia R, Jones SP, Sharp BR, Hoffmeyer MR, Farvid AR, Gibson MF, Lefer AM. HMG-CoA reductase inhibition protects the diabetic myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury. FASEB J. 2001; 15: 1454–1456.[Free Full Text]
8. Scalia R, Gooszen ME, Jones SP, Hoffmeyer M, Rimmer DM, Trocha SD, Huang PL, Smith MB, Lefer AM, Lefer DJ. Simvastatin exerts both anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects in apoE deficient mice. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2598–2603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Endres M, Laufs U, Huang Z, Nakamura T, Huang P, Moskowitz M, Liao J. Stroke protection by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase inhibitors mediated by endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 8880–8885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Fukuda H, Sawa Y, Kadoba K, Taniguchi K, Shimazaki Y, Matsuda H. Supplement of nitric oxide attenuates neutrophil-mediated reperfusion injury. Circulation. 1995; 92 (suppl II): II-413–II-416.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Gauthier TW, Davenpeck KL, Lefer AM. Nitric oxide attenuates leukocyte-endothelial interaction via P-selectin in splanchnic ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: G562–G568.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Guo JP, Milhoan KA, Tuan RS, Lefer AM. Beneficial effect of SPM-5185, a cysteine-containing nitric oxide donor, in rat carotid artery intimal injury. Circ Res. 1994; 75: 77–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Johnson GIII, Tsao PS, Lefer AM. Cardioprotective effects of authentic nitric oxide in myocardial ischemia with reperfusion. Crit Care Med. 1991; 19: 244–252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Lefer DJ, Nakanishi K, Johnston WE, Vinten-Johansen J. Antineutrophil and myocardial protecting actions of a novel nitric oxide donor after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion of dogs. Circulation. 1993; 88: 2337–2350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Jones SP, Girod WG, Palazzo AJ, Granger DN, Grisham MB, Jourd’heuil D, Huang PL, Lefer DJ. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury is exacerbated in absence of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: H1567–H1573.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lefer DJ, Jones SP, Girod WG, Baines A, Grisham MB, Cockrell AS, Huang PL, Scalia R. Leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: H1943–H1950.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Jones SP, Trocha SD, Strange MB, Granger DN, Kevil CG, Bullard DC, Lefer DJ. Role of leukocyte and endothelial cell adhesion molecules in a chronic murine model of myocardial reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol. 2000; 279: H2196–H2201.
18. Hoffmeyer MR, Jones SP, Ross CR, Sharp B, Grisham MB, Laroux FS, Stalker TJ, Scalia R, Lefer DJ. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in NADPH oxidase deficient mice. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 812–817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Hoffmeyer MR, Scalia R, Ross CR, Jones SP, Lefer DJ. PR-39, a potent neutrophil inhibitor, attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Am J Physiol. 2000; 279: H2824–H2828.
20. Jones SP, Girod WG, Huang PL, Lefer DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury in nNOS deficient mice. Coron Artery Dis. 2000; 11: 593–597.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Jones SP, Girod WG, Marotti KR, Cole PA, Aw TY, Lefer DJ. Acute exposure to a high cholesterol diet attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in cholesteryl ester transfer protein mice. Coron Artery Dis. 2001; 12: 37–44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Jones SP, Trocha SD, Lefer DJ. Cardioprotective actions of endogenous IL-10 are independent of iNOS. Am J Physiol. 2001; 281: H48–H52.
23. Lorenz JN, Robbins J. Measurement of intraventricular pressure and cardiac performance in the intact closed-chest anesthetized mouse. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: H1137–H1146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Gallagher KP, Buda AJ, Pace D, Gerren RA, Shlafer M. Failure of superoxide dismutase and catalase to alter size of infarction in conscious dogs after 3 hours of occlusion followed by reperfusion. Circulation. 1986; 73: 1065–1076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Tanaka M, Stoler RC, FitzHarris GP, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Evidence against the "early protection-delayed death" hypothesis of superoxide dismutase therapy in experimental myocardial infarction: polyethylene glycol-superoxide dismutase plus catalase does not limit myocardial infarct size in dogs. Circ Res. 1990; 67: 636–644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Ooiwa H, Stanley A, Felaneous-Bylund AC, Wilborn W, Downey JM. Superoxide dismutase conjugated to polyethylene glycol fails to limit myocardial infarct size after 30 min ischemia followed by 72 h of reperfusion in the rabbit. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1991; 23: 119–125.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Laufs U, La Fata V, Liao J. Inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase blocks hypoxia-mediated down-regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 31725–31729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Hernandez-Perera O, Perez-Sala D, Navarro-Antolin J, Sanchez-Pascuala R, Hernandez G, Diaz C, Lamas S. Effects of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin and simvastatin, on the expression of endothelin-1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 2711–2719.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Laufs U, Liao J. Post-transcriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA stability by Rho GTPase. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 24266–24271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Laufs U, La Fata V, Plutzky J, Liao J. Upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by HMG CoA reductase inhibitors. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1129–1135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Deleted in proof.
32. Kureishi Y, Luo Z, Shiojima I, Bialik A, Fulton D, Lefer D, Sessa W, Walsh K. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin activates the protein kinase Akt and promotes angiogenesis in normocholesterolemic animals. Nat Med. 2000; 6: 1–7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Pruefer D, Scalia R, Lefer AM. Simvastatin inhibits leukocyte–endothelial cell interactions and protects against inflammatory processes in normocholesterolemic rats. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2894–2900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Kano H, Hyayashi T, Sumi D, Esaki T, Asai Y, Thakur N, Jayachandran M, Iguchi A. A HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor improved regression of atherosclerosis in the rabbit aorta without affecting serum lipid levels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 259: 414–419.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Sparrow CP, Burton CA, Hernandez M, Mundt S, Hassing H, Patel S, Rosa R, Hermanowski-Vosatka A, Wang P-R, Zhang D, et al. Simvastatin has anti-inflammatory and antiatherosclerotic activities independent of plasma cholesterol lowering. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 115–121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Ye, J. D. Martinez, R. J. Perez-Polo, Y. Lin, B. F. Uretsky, and Y. Birnbaum The role of eNOS, iNOS, and NF-{kappa}B in upregulation and activation of cyclooxygenase-2 and infarct size reduction by atorvastatin Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): H343 - H351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Nahrendorf, D. Sosnovik, J. W. Chen, P. Panizzi, J.-L. Figueiredo, E. Aikawa, P. Libby, F. K. Swirski, and R. Weissleder Activatable Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agent Reports Myeloperoxidase Activity in Healing Infarcts and Noninvasively Detects the Antiinflammatory Effects of Atorvastatin on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Circulation, March 4, 2008; 117(9): 1153 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Birnbaum, Y. Lin, Y. Ye, R. Merla, J. R. Perez-Polo, and B. F. Uretsky Pretreatment With High-Dose Statin, But Not Low-Dose Statin, Ezetimibe, or the Combination of Low-Dose Statin and Ezetimibe, Limits Infarct Size in the Rat Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2008; 13(1): 72 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Yin, J. Zhu, Z. Wang, H. Huang, J. Qian, Z. Li, and H. Jing Simvastatin attenuates cardiac isograft ischemia-reperfusion injury by down-regulating CC chemokine receptor-2 expression J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2007; 134(3): 780 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Merla, Y. Ye, Y. Lin, S. Manickavasagam, M.-H. Huang, R. J. Perez-Polo, B. F. Uretsky, and Y. Birnbaum The central role of adenosine in statin-induced ERK1/2, Akt, and eNOS phosphorylation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1918 - H1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ye, Y. Lin, R. Perez-Polo, M.-H. Huang, M. G. Hughes, D. J. McAdoo, S. Manickavasagam, B. F. Uretsky, and Y. Birnbaum Enhanced cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury with a dipyridamole and low-dose atorvastatin combination Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H813 - H818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Elrod, J. J. M. Greer, and D. J. Lefer Sildenafil-mediated acute cardioprotection is independent of the NO/cGMP pathway Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H342 - H347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. M. Greer, A. K. Kakkar, J. W. Elrod, L. J. Watson, S. P. Jones, and D. J. Lefer Low-dose simvastatin improves survival and ventricular function via eNOS in congestive heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2743 - H2751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Elrod, J. J.M. Greer, N. S. Bryan, W. Langston, J. F. Szot, H. Gebregzlabher, S. Janssens, M. Feelisch, and D. J. Lefer Cardiomyocyte-Specific Overexpression of NO Synthase-3 Protects Against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(7): 1517 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Atar, Y. Ye, Y. Lin, S. Y. Freeberg, S. P. Nishi, S. Rosanio, M.-H. Huang, B. F. Uretsky, J. R. Perez-Polo, and Y. Birnbaum Atorvastatin-induced cardioprotection is mediated by increasing inducible nitric oxide synthase and consequent S-nitrosylation of cyclooxygenase-2 Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): H1960 - H1968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Pascual, J. M. Arribas, P. L. Tornel, F. Marin, C. Oliver, M. Ahumada, J. Gomez-Plana, P. Martinez, R. Arcas, and M. Valdes Preoperative Statin Therapy and Troponin T Predict Early Complications of Coronary Artery Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 78 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. M. Greer, D. P. Ware, and D. J. Lefer Myocardial infarction and heart failure in the db/db diabetic mouse Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): H146 - H153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mori, K. Y. Stokes, T. Vowinkel, N. Watanabe, J. W. Elrod, N. R. Harris, D. J. Lefer, T. Hibi, and D. N. Granger Colonic blood flow responses in experimental colitis: time course and underlying mechanisms Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): G1024 - G1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Mensah, M. M. Mocanu, and D. M. Yellon Failure to protect the myocardium against ischemia/reperfusion injury after chronic atorvastatin treatment is recaptured by acute atorvastatin treatment: A potential role for phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1287 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Schulz Pleiotropic effects of statins: Acutely good, but chronically bad? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1292 - 1294. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. O. Weinberg, M. Scherrer-Crosbie, M. H. Picard, B. A. Nasseri, C. MacGillivray, J. Gannon, Q. Lian, K. D. Bloch, and R. T. Lee Rosuvastatin reduces experimental left ventricular infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion injury but not total coronary occlusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1802 - H1809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Multani, J. S. Ikonomidis, P. Y. Kim, E. A. Miller, K. J. Payne, R. Mukherjee, B. H. Dorman, and F. G. Spinale Dynamic and differential changes in myocardial and plasma endothelin in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 584 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Birnbaum, Y. Ye, S. Rosanio, S. Tavackoli, Z.-Y. Hu, E. R. Schwarz, and B. F. Uretsky Prostaglandins mediate the cardioprotective effects of atorvastatin against ischemia-reperfusion injury Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2005; 65(2): 345 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Jones, J. J. M. Greer, P. D. Ware, J. Yang, K. Walsh, and D. J. Lefer Deficiency of iNOS does not attenuate severe congestive heart failure in mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H365 - H370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Jones, J. J. M. Greer, A. K. Kakkar, P. D. Ware, R. H. Turnage, M. Hicks, R. van Haperen, R. de Crom, S. Kawashima, M. Yokoyama, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase overexpression attenuates myocardial reperfusion injury Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): H276 - H282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Jones, Y. Teshima, M. Akao, and E. Marban Simvastatin Attenuates Oxidant-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cardiac Myocytes Circ. Res., October 17, 2003; 93(8): 697 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. Tiefenbacher, J. Kapitza, V. Dietz, C.-H. Lee, and F. Niroomand Reduction of myocardial infarct size by fluvastatin Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 5, 2003; 285(1): H59 - H64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Jones, J. J. M. Greer, R. van Haperen, D. J. Duncker, R. de Crom, and D. J. Lefer Endothelial nitric oxide synthase overexpression attenuates congestive heart failure in mice PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4891 - 4896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Jones, M. R. Hoffmeyer, B. R. Sharp, Y.-S. Ho, and D. J. Lefer Role of intracellular antioxidant enzymes after in vivo myocardial ischemia and reperfusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): H277 - H282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Lefer Statins as Potent Antiinflammatory Drugs Circulation, October 15, 2002; 106(16): 2041 - 2042. [Full Text] [PDF]

<