Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (M.T., G.S.), University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; the Department of Microbiology (R.F.M.), The Ohio State University, Columbus; and the Department of Internal Medicine II (C.R., T.P.Z., M.B., J.W., W.K., V.H., J.T.), Cardiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Correspondence to Dr Jan Torzewski, University of Ulm, Department of Internal Medicine II, Cardiology, Robert Koch-Str. 8, 89081 Ulm, Germany. E-mail Jan.Torzewski{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: C-reactive proteins C-reactive protein receptors monocytes chemotaxis atherogenesis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The majority of inflammatory cells infiltrating the arterial wall in early atherogenesis are monocytes.2 The fact that hardly any neutrophils are present in the lesion is an enigma of atherosclerosis research. Local release of monocyte chemotactic protein-1, a specific monocyte chemoattractant synthesized by cells in the lesion, and other chemokines may explain this phenomenon in part.3 4 5
C-reactive protein (CRP) is the prototype acute-phase protein in humans. In the acute-phase response, its plasma concentration can exceed the normal concentration by 1000-fold.6 By contrast, serum amyloid P, the second member of the pentraxin family, is constitutively present in human serum at 30 to 50 µg/mL, with a maximum 2-fold increase during sepsis, whereas it is an acute-phase reactant in mice.7
The predictive association between CRP and coronary artery disease has been extensively confirmed. The association seen with modest elevations of CRP exists in inpatients with severe unstable angina,8 in outpatients with angina,9 and even in apparently healthy general populations.10 11 Evidence is now accumulating to suggest that CRP may contribute to inflammation in atheroma and also may be actively involved in early atherogenesis. The protein displays Ca2+-dependent in vitro binding to LDL12 13 and activates the complement system.14 15 Native CRP is deposited in human atherosclerotic lesions.16 17 18 Recently, colocalization of CRP and C5b-9, the terminal complement complex, has been demonstrated in early human atherosclerotic lesions, indicating that CRP is an important complement-activating molecule in the lesion.19 Colocalization of CRP and foam cells in fatty streaks suggests an interaction of CRP with the cells,19 but the pathobiological meaning of this interaction is, as yet, unclear.
Different receptors have been described for CRP. On monocytes, specific
CRP binding occurs through Fc
RI/CD64 with low
affinity20 as well as Fc
RIIa/CD32 with high
affinity.21 Very recently, it has been shown that CRP
binding to Fc
RIIa/CD32 on human monocytes and neutrophils is
allele specific.22 However, further data suggest the
existence of an additional "unique" CRP receptor
(CRP-R)23 involved in CRP binding and signaling. At this
stage, additional research is needed to clarify the contribution of the
different receptors to CRP binding.24
Reports on chemotactic effects of CRP on monocytes/macrophages are controversial. One earlier report indicates that CRP stimulates human monocyte chemotaxis and procoagulant activity.25 However, another study shows that native CRP does not have chemotactic effects on monocytes.26 Recent reports demonstrate inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis by CRP.23 27 28 Some reports on CRP action on leukocytes deal with CRP peptides. The in vivo relevance of these CRP peptides is at least questionable because CRP is very resistant to proteolysis, and no CRP fragments have yet been reported in biological fluids either in vivo or ex vivo.
The present study focuses on human material exclusively. In light of the increasing evidence of an active role of CRP in atherosclerotic lesion formation, we have investigated a possible functional role for CRP in monocyte recruitment.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antibodies
The murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against human CRP
(clone CRP-8, IgG1, used at a 1:500 dilution) was purchased from Sigma
Chemical Co.19 The murine mAb directed against the
macrophage marker CD68 (clone PG-M1, IgG3, used at a 1:100
dilution) was purchased from DAKO.
The murine mAb clone RC10.2 (IgM
) is directed against the leukocyte
CRP-Rinhibiting specific ligand binding to granulocytic and monocytic
human cell lines. Generation and specificity controls of this antibody
have been described in detail.23 The human promonocytic
cell line U937 served as a source for the CRP-R protein. The antibody
was generated by immunization of BALB/c mice.23
Primary antibodies were detected by using biotinylated anti-mouse polyclonal antibodies (Vector Laboratories, DAKO).
Immunohistochemical Staining With Individual Antibodies
Immunohistochemical staining for CRP and CD68 was performed as
described.19 Preabsorption of mAb CRP-8 with solid-phase
CRP by ligand coupling to HiTrap affinity columns (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) and an irrelevant isotype-matched antibody to mAb RC10.2
(directed against Aspergillus niger glucose oxidase, clone
DAK-GO8, IgM, DAKO) were used to control staining specificity.
Cell Culture
The culture medium used for monocytes was DMEM (GIBCO) buffered
with 3.7 g/L NaHCO3 and gassed with 5%
CO2. The pH of the culture medium was 7.25. Cells
were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C. Human blood
monocytes were isolated from donors as described.32
Chemotaxis assays were performed immediately after preparation. Cell
viability was assessed by trypan blue uptake.
C-Reactive Protein
Human CRP was purchased from Sigma (solution in 0.02 mol/L Tris
and 0.25 mol/L sodium chloride, pH 8.0). CRP was purified from human
plasma by using Ca2+-dependent affinity of the
protein to phosphorylcholine. Purity of the protein is
98%, as
determined by SDS-PAGE. The preparation displayed a single protein band
of Mr
21 000. The physical state was
examined by centrifuging 100 µg in 5 mL of a linear 10% to 40%
(wt/vol) sucrose density gradient in 20 mmol/L Tris, 100
mmol/L NaCl, and 2 mmol/L Ca2+ buffer
(50 000 rpm, vertical rotor VTi 65, 4°C, 60 minutes, Beckman
ultracentrifuge model L60). The protein sedimented in a
symmetrical peak of
5.5S, and protein was not detected in higher
Mr fractions (>19S). Thus, the CRP did not
autoaggregate. During preparation, precautions were taken to avoid
lipopolysaccharide contamination. The latter was excluded by
Limulus endotoxin assay (Kinetic-QCL, BioWhittaker).
Sensitivity of the assay is 0.015 to 400 IU/mL.
Chemotaxis Assay
Monocyte chemotaxis was assayed in a 48-well microchemotaxis
chamber (Neuroprobe).33 Cells were used at a density of
5x105/mL in DMEM. Upper and lower wells were
separated by a polyvinylpyrrolidone-free polycarbonate membrane
(25x80 mm, pore size 5 µm, Costar). Incubation time was 3
hours. Migrated cells present on the bottom face of the filter were
stained and counted under the light microscope by using a specific
counting grid. Cells were counted in 5 random high-power fields per
well. Each sample was tested in 4 wells. DMEM was used as a negative
control; formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (FMLP) at a concentration of 100 nmol/L,
inducing a chemotactic index (number of migrated cells in the sample
per number of migrated cells in the control) of
2, was used as a
positive control. Checkerboard analysis was performed to
differentiate chemotactic from chemokinetic responses. Statistical
analysis was performed by subsequent Student t
tests. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. To block chemotactic activity of CRP, monocytes were
preincubated with the antiCRP-R mAb at a concentration of 4
µg/mL.
Immunofluorescent Staining With RC10.2
Monocytes were seeded on glass slides in DMEM/10% AB
serum and fixed in 4% formaldehyde. Cells were incubated with
antiCRP-R mAb (2 µg/mL) for 30 minutes. A secondary TRITC-labeled
antibody (donkey anti-mouse IgM TRITC, Dianova) was added at a dilution
of 1:50 for another 30 minutes. Cells were mounted in Mowiol
(Calbiochem) and visualized with an immunofluorescent
microscope. Controls included replacement of the antiCRP-R mAb by an
irrelevant isotype-matched mouse mAb and preincubation of cells with
CRP (640 µg/mL) for 3 hours at 4°C before staining with RC10.2.
Double Staining for CRP and CD68
Slides were incubated with the first antibody against CRP,
visualized by immersion in diaminobenzidine
tetrachloride,19 and rinsed in Tris-buffered saline. After
renewed blocking with 5% normal horse serum, slides were incubated
with anti-CD68.19 Slides were then incubated with
biotin-conjugated anti-mouse antibody, followed by avidin-biotin
peroxidase reagent. This time, the reaction products were
visualized by immersing the slides in 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole.
Finally, the slides were counterstained with hematoxylin and
mounted.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 layer next to the luminal surface. Occasionally, these cells were
obvious throughout most of the intima. There was no evidence of an
endothelial cover because of early postmortem
dissociation of the
endothelium.34
CRP Deposits in Edematous Gelatinous Lesions Preceding
Monocyte Infiltration
No CRP staining could be seen within adaptive and diffuse intimal
thickenings without any signs of atherosclerotic lesion development
(Figure 1A
). A diffuse deposition of CRP
could be seen in the areas where the outer half of the fibroelastic
layer and the fibromuscular layer of the intima of adaptive and diffuse
intimal thickenings seemed to be translucent (Figure 1C
).
However, macrophages were absent or only sparsely distributed
within the intima in normal and dispersed adaptive and diffuse intimal
thickenings (Figure 1B
and 1D
). The general pattern of CRP
deposits in early atherosclerotic lesions has been described
previously.19 Figure 1
depicts an example of a
sequential section of an initial atherosclerotic lesion with a single
layer of macrophage foam cells next to the luminal surface
(Figure 1F
) and a diffuse deposition of CRP in the outer half of
the fibroelastic layer and in the fibromuscular layer of the intima
adjacent to the media (Figure 1E
). Some of the
macrophages also stained positively for CRP (Figure 1E
).
|
To obtain more precise information on the temporal and spatial
relationship between CRP deposition and monocyte infiltration, we used
the double-staining immunoperoxidase method. Figure 2
shows double
immunostaining for CRP (brown) and CD68 (red) applied
to a single tissue of another initial atherosclerotic lesion. Monocytes
infiltrate the arterial wall at sites of CRP
deposition.
|
When mAb CRP-8 was preabsorbed with solid-phase CRP,
immunohistochemical staining became negative (Figure 1C
, insert).
CRP Is Chemotactic for Human Blood Monocytes
At CRP concentrations ranging from 5 to 160 µg/mL, DMEM was used
as test medium for chemotaxis in the microchemotaxis chamber. DMEM
served as the negative control, and FMLP (100 nmol/L) was used as a
positive control. Figure 3A
shows a
significant increase in monocyte migration with increasing
concentrations of CRP. The maximum chemotactic response was observed at
a CRP concentration of 40 µg/mL. The average chemotactic index at
this concentration was 2.4. Higher CRP concentrations resulted in a
decrease of chemotactic activity, thus representing a
characteristic chemotactic response. Checkerboard analysis
indicated a true chemotactic rather than chemokinetic response (Figure 3B
), because monocyte migration depended on the presence of a
CRP gradient between the upper and lower face of the filter.
|
CRP-R Is Expressed by Monocytes and Chemotactic Activity of CRP Is
Abolished by AntiCRP-R mAb
Immunofluorescent staining of freshly isolated monocytes
with the antiCRP-R mAb showed an intense cell membranefocused
positive stain of cells (Figure 4
). The
irrelevant isotype-matched IgM antibody at equivalent concentrations
did not reveal any immunofluorescent staining (Figure 4B
). Preincubation of cells with CRP (640 µg/mL) at 4°C for
3 hours markedly reduced immunofluorescent staining with the
antiCRP-R (Figure 4C
).
|
CRP (40 µg/mL) was offered to freshly isolated monocytes in the
microchemotaxis chamber. Monocytes were allowed to bind with
antiCRP-R mAb at 4 µg/mL before the cells were used in the
chemotaxis assay. Figure 5
demonstrates
complete blockage of CRP-mediated chemotaxis. In contrast, the
irrelevant isotype-matched IgM antibody (4 µg/mL) did not inhibit
CRP-mediated chemotaxis. Cell viability was not affected by the
antiCRP-R mAb or by CRP itself, as assessed by trypan blue dye
exclusion uptake (data not shown).
|
Localization of CRP-R in Early Atherosclerotic Lesions
The CRP-R was found to be localized in all of the early
atherosclerotic lesions studied. However, CRP-R staining was seen
neither in edematous gelatinous lesions nor in adaptive and diffuse
intimal thickenings without any signs of atherosclerotic lesion
development. The predominant manifestation of the CRP-R in the early
lesions was a positive staining along the cell surface of foam cells.
Occasionally, there was also a strong cytoplasmic staining. In initial
atherosclerotic lesions, the CRP-Rpositive cells were localized next
to the luminal surface (Figure 6A
and 6B
). In fatty streaks, they were obvious throughout most of the intima,
including the basal layer of the intima adjacent to the media (Figure 6C
). In general, there was no CRP-R staining within the media of
the artery. A similar staining procedure performed with the irrelevant
IgM mAb yielded negative results with all tissue specimens (Figure 6D
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we have investigated a potential role for CRP in monocyte recruitment in human atherogenesis. We describe the distribution of monocytes, CRP, and CRP-Rs in edematous gelatinous areas and early atherosclerotic lesions not only by demonstrating that CRP deposition in the arterial wall precedes monocyte infiltration but also by demonstrating CRP-R immunoreactivity on infiltrating monocytes and foam cells. Additionally, we have demonstrated in vitro that CRP is chemotactic for human blood monocytes in a Boyden microchemotaxis chamber, and by using checkerboard analysis, we have demonstrated that this response is chemotactic rather than chemokinetic. We also have evidence by means of immunofluorescent staining with the antiCRP-R mAb that human blood monocytes express specific CRP-Rs. In addition, we demonstrate that CRP-mediated monocyte chemotaxis is abolished by a specific antiCRP-R mAb.
The fact that foam cells in early lesions stain positively for the CRP-R as well as CRP19 is consistent with the hypothesis that CRP participates in foam cell formation by opsonizing lipid particles. Colocalization of CRP with so-called enzymatically degraded LDL (E-LDL)32 35 36 was recently demonstrated in early atherosclerotic lesions.13 Although there is evidence that foam cell formation by E-LDL is in part due to lipoprotein uptake via a scavenger receptormediated pathway,32 cellular uptake of E-LDL may be accompanied by the uptake of bound CRP and mediated by the CRP-R. This hypothesis is supported by the cytoplasmic staining, which is occasionally observed with the antiCRP-R mAb and which is consistent with earlier findings demonstrating that receptor-bound CRP is internalized by macrophages via the endosomal route and is partially degraded, followed by recycling of the CRP-R.37 Engulfment of cellular debris by monocytes after opsonization with CRP could provide an additional explanation for CRP-Rpositive staining within foam cells, inasmuch as we observed partial colocalization of CRP deposition with few apoptotic nuclei in early atherosclerotic lesions as assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferasemediated dUTP nick end-labeling (M.T. et al, unpublished data, 2000).
CRP may be an important component of the plasma proteins insudating the arterial wall preceding the so-called initial atherosclerotic lesion, which is characterized by the first appearance of monocyte-derived macrophage foam cells. Monocyte infiltration into the arterial wall is a 2-step process that involves adherence to the activated endothelium first and directed migration to a chemotactic gradient second.4 Diffusely deposited CRP may generate a chemotactic gradient within the arterial wall, attracting monocytes that have transmigrated the endothelium.
Inhibition of CRP-mediated chemotaxis by the antiCRP-R mAb in vitro
provides a base for future use of this antibody in an experimental
animal model to try to inhibit monocyte chemotaxis into the
arterial wall. Further studies are required to address the
involvement of other receptors, in particular Fc
receptors
(Fc
RI/CD64 and Fc
RII/CD32), in CRP-mediated chemotaxis. In
addition, the role of so-called modified CRP in atherogenesis
awaits investigation. This denatured CRP has recently been detected in
normal vascular tissue and has notably different biological properties
and effects on cells than does native CRP.38 Nonetheless,
early accumulation of native CRP in insudated areas may partly explain
some of the phenomena in atherosclerotic lesion formation that are
hitherto not understood. First, in addition to other chemoattractants,
eg, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, CRP may act as a chemoattractant
for blood monocytes in vivo. Second, CRP is known to inhibit neutrophil
chemotaxis23 26 27 and the binding of neutrophils to
endothelial cells. The latter is caused by the
stimulation of cleavage and shedding of L-selectin from neutrophil
membranes.39 This may well explain why hardly any
neutrophils are found in the lesion, although potent neutrophil
chemoattractants, eg, C5a, must be generated within the lesion.
In summary, our data suggest that in addition to complement activation, stimulation of monocyte chemotaxis and inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis may be important inflammatory mechanisms induced by CRP deposition in the arterial wall. In light of increasing evidence for CRP being intimately involved in the processes of atherogenesis, our data suggest an early role for CRP in promoting the progression of insudated areas into manifest early atherosclerotic lesions.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 6, 2000; accepted June 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Rodriguez-Moran and F Guerrero-Romero Serum magnesium and C-reactive protein levels Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 676 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Grammer, W. Marz, W. Renner, B. O. Bohm, and M. M. Hoffmann C-reactive protein genotypes associated with circulating C-reactive protein but not with angiographic coronary artery disease: the LURIC study Eur. Heart J., May 21, 2008; (2008) ehn191v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Aziz, K. Berger, K. Claycombe, R. Huang, R. Patel, and G. S. Abela Noninvasive Detection and Localization of Vulnerable Plaque and Arterial Thrombosis With Computed Tomography Angiography/Positron Emission Tomography Circulation, April 22, 2008; 117(16): 2061 - 2070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Singh, M. V. Suresh, D. C. Prayther, J. P. Moorman, A. E. Rusinol, and A. Agrawal C-Reactive Protein-Bound Enzymatically Modified Low-Density Lipoprotein Does Not Transform Macrophages into Foam Cells J. Immunol., March 15, 2008; 180(6): 4316 - 4322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Van Vre, H. Bult, V. Y. Hoymans, V. F.I. Van Tendeloo, C. J. Vrints, and J. M. Bosmans Human C-Reactive Protein Activates Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells and Induces Dendritic Cell-Mediated T-Cell Activation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(3): 511 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Brevetti, V. Schiano, E. Laurenzano, G. Giugliano, M. Petretta, F. Scopacasa, and M. Chiariello Myeloperoxidase, but not C-reactive protein, predicts cardiovascular risk in peripheral arterial disease Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2008; 29(2): 224 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Haugen, I. P. Casserly, J. G. Regensteiner, and W. R. Hiatt Risk assessment in the patient with established peripheral arterial disease Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2007; 12(4): 343 - 350. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Barutcu, A. T. Sezgin, N. Sezgin, H. Gullu, A. M. Esen, E. Topal, R. Ozdemir, F. Kosar, and S. Cehreli Increased High Sensitive CRP Level and Its Significance in Pathogenesis of Slow Coronary Flow Angiology, September 1, 2007; 58(4): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Teoh, A. Quan, and S. Verma Does C-reactive protein predict saphenous vein graft patency? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 277 - 279. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Lorenz, P. Karbstein, H. S. Markus, and M. Sitzer High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Carotid Intima-Media Progression: The Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1774 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lavi, J. P. McConnell, C. S. Rihal, A. Prasad, V. Mathew, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman Local Production of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 and Lysophosphatidylcholine in the Coronary Circulation: Association With Early Coronary Atherosclerosis and Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2715 - 2721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rocker, D. E. Manolov, E. V. Kuzmenkina, K. Tron, H. Slatosch, J. Torzewski, and G. U. Nienhaus Affinity of C-Reactive Protein toward Fc{gamma}RI Is Strongly Enhanced by the {gamma}-Chain Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2007; 170(2): 755 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Anwaruddin, A. T. Askari, and E. J. Topol Redefining Risk in Acute Coronary Syndromes Using Molecular Medicine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 23, 2007; 49(3): 279 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liuzzo, M. Santamaria, L. M. Biasucci, M. Narducci, V. Colafrancesco, A. Porto, S. Brugaletta, M. Pinnelli, V. Rizzello, A. Maseri, et al. Persistent Activation of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Signaling Pathway in Patients With Unstable Angina and Elevated Levels of C-Reactive Protein: Evidence for a Direct Proinflammatory Effect of Azide and Lipopolysaccharide-Free C-Reactive Protein on Human Monocytes Via Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Activation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 185 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Lange, C. S. Carlson, L. A. Hindorff, E. M. Lange, J. Walston, J. P. Durda, M. Cushman, J. C. Bis, D. Zeng, D. Lin, et al. Association of Polymorphisms in the CRP Gene With Circulating C-Reactive Protein Levels and Cardiovascular Events JAMA, December 13, 2006; 296(22): 2703 - 2711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Howard-Alpe, J. W. Sear, and P. Foex Methods of detecting atherosclerosis in non-cardiac surgical patients; the role of biochemical markers Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2006; 97(6): 758 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Kolodgie, A. P. Burke, K. S. Skorija, E. Ladich, R. Kutys, A. T. Makuria, and R. Virmani Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Protein Expression in the Natural Progression of Human Coronary Atherosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2006; 26(11): 2523 - 2529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rahmani, R. P. Cruz, D. J. Granville, and B. M. McManus Allograft Vasculopathy Versus Atherosclerosis Circ. Res., October 13, 2006; 99(8): 801 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Juonala, J. S.A. Viikari, T. Ronnemaa, L. Taittonen, J. Marniemi, and O. T. Raitakari Childhood C-Reactive Protein in Predicting CRP and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Adulthood: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2006; 26(8): 1883 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Kilic, D Ural, E Ural, Z Yumuk, A Agacdiken, T Sahin, G Kahraman, G Kozdag, A Vural, and B Komsuoglu Relation between proinflammatory to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratios and long-term prognosis in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1041 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |