Editorial |
From the Department of Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Correspondence to Philip Barter, University Department of Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia 5000. E-mail pbarter{at}medicine.adelaide.edu.au
Key Words: : CETP atherosclerosis HDL
Ever since cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) was first identified, there have been conflicting opinions regarding its role (if any) in the development of atherosclerosis. According to 1 view, CETP is antiatherogenic by virtue of its ability to increase the rate of reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), the pathway in which cholesterol in peripheral tissues is transported to the liver for elimination in bile. This pathway involves an initial uptake of cell cholesterol by HDL, where it is esterified before being transferred by CETP to LDL and VLDL. The cholesteryl esters in the VLDL/LDL pool are subsequently delivered to the liver and ultimately eliminated from the body as a component of bile. Thus, to the extent that CETP enhances the rate of RCT, it may be an antiatherogenic factor. However, the fact that CETP redistributes cholesteryl esters from the nonatherogenic HDL to the potentially atherogenic VLDL/LDL implies that it may also be proatherogenic.
The situation is even further complicated by mounting evidence that concentration-dependent, anti-inflammatory functions of HDL may also contribute to its antiatherogenicity.1 Because CETP decreases the concentration of HDL,2 it may decrease the anti-inflammatory impact of this lipoprotein fraction in a process that is ultimately proatherogenic. Thus, on theoretical grounds, CETP may be either proatherogenic or antiatherogenic, depending on which of the HDL functions is dominant. As outlined below, the situation has not been clarified by more direct studies in vivo in animals in which evidence supporting both a proatherogenic3 4 5 and an antiatherogenic6 7 role of CETP has been reported.
What Is CETP and What Does It Do?
CETP is a hydrophobic glycoprotein that is secreted from the liver and that circulates in plasma, bound mainly to HDL.8 It promotes the redistribution of cholesteryl esters, triglyceride, and, to a lessor extent, phospholipids between plasma lipoproteins. CETP picks up lipids from lipoprotein particles and deposits them in other lipoproteins in a process that results in an equilibration of lipids between lipoprotein fractions.9 Because most of the cholesteryl esters in plasma originate in HDL in the reaction catalyzed by lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) and most of the triglyceride enters plasma as a component of chylomicrons and VLDL (triglyceride-rich lipoproteins), the overall effect of CETP is a net mass transfer of cholesteryl esters from HDL to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and LDL and of triglyceride from triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to LDL and HDL.
One consequence of these CETP-mediated transfers of cholesteryl esters from HDL is a reduction in the cholesterol content, the apoA-I content, and the size of HDL particles.10 This "remodeling" of HDL is accompanied by the dissociation from the HDL of lipid-poor, pre-ß-migrating apoA-I,10 the fraction that has been reported to be the preferred plasma acceptor of cell cholesterol.
Is CETP Rate Limiting In Vivo?
Under normal conditions, the rate of CETP-mediated cholesteryl ester transfer is rapid relative to the rate of HDL and LDL catabolism.9 As a consequence, the pools of cholesteryl esters in HDL and LDL are close to equilibrium in vivo, with transfers between the 2 fractions being approximately equal in each direction.9 An increase in the activity of CETP may increase the rate of bidirectional transfers but will have little effect on the distribution of cholesteryl esters between the 2 lipoprotein fractions. Furthermore, a reduction in CETP activity will become rate limiting only when the rate of transfer becomes slow relative to the rate of LDL and HDL catabolism. Thus, under normal conditions, the amount of CETP is probably not rate limiting in the exchange of lipids between HDL and LDL unless its activity is markedly reduced. However, in the case of transfers between HDL and the much more rapidly catabolized VLDL, the amount of CETP in plasma is almost certainly rate limiting. Indeed, when the concentration of VLDL is increased, the amount of CETP is the limiting factor in the rate at which cholesteryl esters are transferred from HDL.11
In Vivo Evidence That CETP May Be Antiatherogenic
Human Studies: The Honolulu Heart Study
Analysis of subjects in the Honolulu Heart Study indicated
that when a deficiency of CETP was associated with an HDL
cholesterol level between 1.06 and 1.55 mmol/L, the
risk of coronary heart disease was increased relative to that
in normal-CETP subjects with the same level of HDL
cholesterol.12 However, for subjects with
levels of HDL cholesterol >1.55 mmol/L, the
coronary risk was low, whether or not there was a deficiency of
CETP. This finding provides strong circumstantial evidence that a
deficiency of CETP can be proatherogenic (possibly because of a
compromised RCT) if the associated increase in HDL is modest. If,
however, the CETP deficiency is accompanied by a more substantial
increase in HDL, the effects of the resulting increase in (for example)
the anti-inflammatory potential of this lipoprotein fraction may
override the proatherogenic consequences of the compromised RCT.
Animal Studies
Expression of CETP in Hypertriglyceridemic Mice
Mice engineered to overexpress human apoC-III have high levels of
triglyceride-rich lipoproteins remnants and develop
atherosclerosis. Introduction and expression of the
CETP gene into these animals reduce the extent of
atherosclerosis.6 The development of
atherosclerosis in apoC-IIItransgenic mice indicates
that the proatherogenic potential of these remnants exceeds the
antiatherogenic potential of HDL. When CETP is expressed in these
animals, the resulting increase in RCT may provide an antiatherogenic
balance to the remnant particles and hence, reduce
atherosclerosis.
Expression of CETP in LCAT-Transgenic Mice
Mice made transgenic with human LCAT have an increase in
concentration of HDL but paradoxically, also an increased
susceptibility to atherosclerosis.13
Expression of simian CETP in these animals eliminates the
atherosclerosis.7 It has been argued that
the HDLs that accumulate in the LCAT-transgenic animals are overly
enriched in cholesteryl esters and, in the absence of CETP, become
dysfunctional in terms of their ability to promote cell
cholesterol efflux. A possible increase in
anti-inflammatory potential resulting from the increased concentration
of HDL may be insufficient to counterbalance the reduced
cholesterol efflux. Introduction of CETP enables the excess
cholesteryl esters to be transferred from the HDL, thereby restoring
their efficiency as acceptors of cell cholesterol and
inhibiting the development of atherosclerosis.
In Vivo Evidence That CETP May Be Proatherogenic
Expression of CETP in Atherosclerosis-Prone
Mice
In studies of cholesterol-fed,
atherosclerosis-prone mice, the introduction and
overexpression of the simian CETP gene results in worse
atherosclerosis than in nonexpressing
controls3 . It was concluded that the enhancement of
atherosclerosis by CETP was secondary to a
redistribution of cholesterol from HDL to the VLDL/LDL
fraction. In another study,4 the human CETP gene was
introduced into apoE-knockout mice and LDL receptorknockout mice,
both of which develop spontaneous atherosclerosis. CETP
expression in these animal models redistributed cholesterol
from HDL to the VLDL/LDL pool and again increased the development of
atherosclerosis.4 However, when the CETP
was overexpressed in apoE-knockout mice that also overexpressed human
apoA-I, the effect of CETP on the development of
atherosclerosis was nonsignificant, despite being
associated with a major reduction in the concentration of HDL
cholesterol.4 Expression of CETP in the
animals also expressing human apoA-I increased the rate of clearance of
cholesteryl esters from HDL. On this basis, it was suggested that a
CETP-mediated increase in the rate of RCT may have overcome the
consequences of the reduced HDL concentration in these animals. These
results are again consistent with CETPs being proatherogenic
by virtue of reducing the concentration of HDL and redistributing
cholesteryl esters from HDL to the VLDL/LDL pool and antiatherogenic as
a consequence of increasing the rate of RCT.
Inhibition of CETP in Rabbits
Rabbits have a naturally high level of CETP.14 In a
recent study of cholesterol-fed rabbits, inhibition of CETP
by injection of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides against
CETP resulted in a reduction in CETP mRNA and mass, a reduction in
plasma total cholesterol, and an increased concentration of
HDL cholesterol.5 There was also an increase
in LDL receptor mRNA associated with the antisense
oligodeoxynucleotides. These changes were accompanied by a
marked reduction in aortic cholesterol content. The results
of this study are again consistent with the multiple effects of
CETP, the sum of which (at least in the rabbit) is proatherogenic.
Another approach to inhibiting CETP in vivo has involved infusion of anti-CETP antibodies into rabbits.15 An effect of CETP on the distribution of cholesteryl esters between HDL and VLDL/LDL was confirmed, but the study did not address the effects on the development of atherosclerosis. In a report in the current issue of Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology,16 a vaccine approach has been used to generate antibodies against CETP in vivo in rabbits. The effect of this vaccination on the development of atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed animals was assessed. The immunized animals had a reduced activity of CETP that was accompanied by a substantial increase in the concentration of HDL cholesterol, a modest decrease in LDL cholesterol concentration, and a significant reduction in aortic atherosclerotic lesions. This study demonstrates that long-term inhibition of CETP is not only possible but, in rabbits at least, reduces the susceptibility to atherosclerosis. Whether or not such long-term inhibition of CETP is also beneficial in humans is currently unknown.
Conclusions
On the basis of the animal studies reported to date, it must be concluded that CETP can be both proatherogenic and antiatherogenic, depending on the metabolic setting and perhaps on the species being investigated. The results of the Honolulu Heart Study suggest that the consequences of inhibiting CETP in vivo in human subjects may also depend on other genetic and environmental factors that influence the concentration of HDL. If the CETP deficiency is not associated with an increase in the HDL level, then the consequences appear to be proatherogenic. If, however, the CETP deficiency is accompanied by a substantial elevation in the level of HDL, the consequences appear to be antiatherogenic.
It is clearly premature to contemplate the long-term inhibition of CETP as a means for preventing coronary disease in human subjects. At the very least, we need short-term studies utilizing either anti-CETP vaccines or small-molecule inhibitors to understand how the acute inhibition of CETP affects the concentration, composition, metabolism, and function of HDL and other lipoproteins in humans in various dyslipidemic states. Armed with such information, it may become possible to explore the therapeutic potential of long-term CETP inhibition from a base that depends on more than guesswork.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Assmann and A. M. Gotto Jr HDL Cholesterol and Protective Factors in Atherosclerosis Circulation, June 15, 2004; 109(23_suppl_1): III-8 - III-14. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tontonoz and D. J. Mangelsdorf Liver X Receptor Signaling Pathways in Cardiovascular Disease Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2003; 17(6): 985 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Herron, S. Vega-Lopez, K. Conde, T. Ramjiganesh, N. S. Shachter, and M. L. Fernandez Men Classified as Hypo- or Hyperresponders to Dietary Cholesterol Feeding Exhibit Differences in Lipoprotein Metabolism J. Nutr., April 1, 2003; 133(4): 1036 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.N. Durrington, B. Mackness, and M.I. Mackness The Hunt for Nutritional and Pharmacological Modulators of Paraoxonase Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2002; 22(8): 1248 - 1250. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Herron, S. Vega-Lopez, K. Conde, T. Ramjiganesh, S. Roy, N. S. Shachter, and M. L. Fernandez Pre-Menopausal Women, Classified as Hypo- or Hyper-Responders, do not Alter their LDL/HDL Ratio Following a High Dietary Cholesterol Challenge J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 21(3): 250 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Romero, K. L. West, T. Zern, and M. L. Fernandez The Seeds from Plantago ovata Lower Plasma Lipids by Altering Hepatic and Bile Acid Metabolism in Guinea Pigs J. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 132(6): 1194 - 1198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.C. Carr, A.F. Ayyobi, S.J. Murdoch, S.S. Deeb, and J.D. Brunzell Contribution of Hepatic Lipase, Lipoprotein Lipase, and Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein to LDL and HDL Heterogeneity in Healthy Women Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2002; 22(4): 667 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Shah, S. Kaul, J. Nilsson, and B. Cercek Exploiting the Vascular Protective Effects of High-Density Lipoprotein and its Apolipoproteins: An Idea Whose Time for Testing Is Coming, Part II Circulation, November 13, 2001; 104(20): 2498 - 2502. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fan, H. Unoki, N. Kojima, H. Sun, H. Shimoyamada, H. Deng, M. Okazaki, H. Shikama, N. Yamada, and T. Watanabe Overexpression of Lipoprotein Lipase in Transgenic Rabbits Inhibits Diet-induced Hypercholesterolemia and Atherosclerosis J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 40071 - 40079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.C. Carr, A.F. Ayyobi, S.J. Murdoch, S.S. Deeb, and J.D. Brunzell Contribution of Hepatic Lipase, Lipoprotein Lipase, and Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein to LDL and HDL Heterogeneity in Healthy Women Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2002; 22(4): 667 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |