Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Biochemistry Group (K.P., J.L., R.S.), The Heart Research Institute, Camperdown, Australia, and Cardiovascular Pharmacology (P.K.W.), AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden. P.K.W. is presently at the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Vancouver, Vancouver BC, Canada.
Correspondence to Roland Stocker, The Heart Research Institute, 145 Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia. E-mail r.stocker{at}hri.org.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: ascorbate atherogenesis lipid peroxidation lipoprotein oxidation probucol
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5% of cholesteryl linoleate (C18:2), the major form of
cholesteryl esters (CEs), are oxidized and evenly distributed as
hydroxides and hydroperoxides among all classes of
lipoproteins.7 However, it is unclear to what extent and
which oxidized lipids cause atherosclerosis. Lipid
hydroperoxides are the primary products formed during the initial
stage of lipoprotein oxidation.8 9 They are also the
precursors for lipid hydroxides and secondary lipid oxidation
products that can contribute to the oxidation of the apolipoprotein
B-100 in LDL.10 Antioxidants may attenuate
atherosclerosis because they inhibit lipid
hydroperoxide formation and hence, lipoprotein
oxidation.1 Probucol, a lipid-lowering antioxidant,11 has been extensively studied in experimental intervention studies of atherosclerosis. Its overall effects, however, remain somewhat contentious. Probucol commonly inhibits atherogenesis in hypercholesterolemic rabbits12 13 and nonhuman primates14 ; inhibits intimal thickening and restenosis after angioplasty in rabbits,15 pigs,16 and humans17 ; and reverses established plaques in rabbits18 and xanthomas in humans.19 However, in cholesterol-fed rabbits maintained at comparable plasma cholesterol levels, probucol does not attenuate atherosclerosis.20 It is also ineffective in reducing established lesions in mature, LDL receptordeficient rabbits21 and nonhuman primates.14 Furthermore, probucol promotes atherosclerosis in the aortic origin in LDL receptor22 23 24 and apolipoprotein Edeficient (apoE-/-) mice25 26 for reasons presently unknown.
The apoE-/- mouse is a useful tool to assess the role of aortic lipoprotein oxidation in atherogenesis.27 28 Hydroperoxides of CEs and triglycerides (LOOHs) and hydroxides of CEs (CE-OHs) in the vessel wall increase in parallel with atherosclerosis.28 We therefore examined the effect of probucol on the aortic content of these primary lipoprotein lipid peroxidation products and lesion size at 4 different sites along the aorta.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tocopherol, purity 96%) was a gift
from Henkel Corp (Sydney, Australia). C18:2 and cholesteryl
arachidonate (C20:4), together referred to as CEs,
unesterified cholesterol, ascorbate, formalin, EDTA,
and BHT were from Sigma Chemical Co, and
-tocopherylquinone was from
Kodak. Coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinone-10) was a gift
from Kaneka Corp (Osaka, Japan). Probucol was from Jucker Pharma
(Stockholm, Sweden), and
2,2'-azobis(2-amidinopropane)hydrochloride (AAPH) and
3,3',5,5'-tetra-tert-butyl-4,4'-bisphenol (bisphenol) were
from Polysciences.
3,3',5,5'-Tetra-tert-butyl-4,4'-diphenoquinone
(diphenoquinone) was prepared from bisphenol,29 and
-tocotrienol was purified as described.6 Authentic
hydroperoxides of C18:2, used as a standard for LOOHs and CE-OHs, were
prepared as described.30 Ubiquinol-10 was
prepared30 and used immediately. Dulbeccos PBS (Sigma)
was prepared with nanopure water and stored over Chelex-100 (Bio-Rad)
at 4°C for 24 hours to remove contaminating transition metals.
Buffers were filtered and argon-flushed.
Animals and Diet
Male C57BL/6J mice, homozygous for the disrupted apoE gene
(apoE-/-)31 and obtained originally from the Jackson
Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Me), were bred at The Heart Research Institute
(Sydney, Australia). Groups of 36 mice (8 or 9 per cage) were fed
standard chow (Laboratory Feed) until the age of 10 weeks.
Subsequently, mice were fed ad libitum a high-fat diet containing
21.2% and 0.15% (wt/wt) fat and cholesterol,
respectively,28 with or without 1% probucol (wt/wt). The
high-fat diet (control and probucol supplemented) was prepared by M.J.
Hoxey and Associates, according to the specifications of the Harlan
Teklad diet TD88137. Control chow did not contain detectable LOOH (not
shown). The local animal ethics committee approved the study.
Plasma Biochemistry
Plasma was obtained from control and probucol-treated mice, and
aliquots were frozen for subsequent determination of lipids. Separate
aliquots were acidified with metaphosphoric acid (5%) to stabilize
vitamin C6 before freezing and storage at
-80°C. The remainder was pooled appropriately and used for ex vivo
oxidation initiated by the peroxyl radical generator AAPH and
lipoprotein separation by fast protein liquid
chromatography with UV280 nm
detection, as described previously.28 Lipid-soluble
antioxidants and lipids were quantified by high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC).32 For
ascorbate, samples were thawed, diluted with Dulbeccos PBS to adjust
the pH to 7.4, and then immediately subjected to HPLC.6
Plasma triglycerides were determined enzymatically
(Boehringer).
Removal of Aortas
After being bled, mice were gravity-perfused for 5 minutes with
Dulbeccos PBS containing 20 µmol/L BHT and 1 mmol/L EDTA
(buffer A), and their aortas were removed as described.28
In brief, the heart, ascending aorta, and descending aorta (past the
femoral junction) were excised and carefully cleaned. Aortas designated
for histology (n=10 and 9 for control and probucol groups,
respectively) were perfusion-fixed with buffer A containing 4%
(vol/vol) formaldehyde and transferred (with the hearts attached) into
formalin. For biochemistry, aortas (n=22 to 24 for both groups) were
not fixed, because adventitious oxidation takes place when standard
fixation procedures are used.28 32 Once cleaned, the
aortas were separated from the heart, taking care to include all aortic
material while avoiding heart tissue. To obtain sufficient material for
HPLC analysis (ie, 30 to 40 mg wet weight tissue), it was
necessary to pool 7 to 8 aortas. Separate pools of aortas were prepared
for both groups, immediately frozen in buffer A, and then stored at
-80°C until analyses.
Biochemistry of Aortic Homogenates
Pooled aortas were snap-frozen in LN2,
pulverized, resuspended in buffer A, homogenized, and then
either treated with metaphosphoric acid (for ascorbate) or
extracted28 ; the hexane fraction was then analyzed
for lipid-soluble antioxidants, cholesterol, CEs, LOOHs,
and CE-OHs by HPLC.28 30 32 LOOH and CE-OH were measured
because they are the primary and major lipid oxidation products
formed when lipoproteins from apoE-/- mice undergo
oxidation.28 Our sample work-up procedure recovers 88±4%
of a hydroperoxide standard of C18:2 added to mouse aorta and is
recovered as LOOH or CE-OH.28 To confirm the identity of
aortic LOOH, HPLC with postcolumn chemiluminescence detection was
used30 before and after NaBH4
treatment of the samples.33 Bisphenol, probucol, and
diphenoquinone were analyzed by gradient reverse-phase
HPLC32 with compounds eluting at
9, 17, and 27 minutes,
respectively. All compounds were quantified by peak area comparison
with authentic standards, and protein determined was performed as
described.28
Morphometry
Lesions were assessed in the aortic root, the aortic arch, the
descending thoracic aorta, and the proximal abdominal aorta. For all 4
sites investigated, cross sections (2 to 3 mm thick) were prepared
and stained with Weigerts hematoxylinvan Giesons stain. In the
aortic root, 2 sections were cut 200 and 350 mm distal from the
point where the aortic valves first appeared, similar to the method
used in our previous study.28 The results are expressed as
the mean cross-sectional area of the 2 sections, a measure directly
related to the total volume of lesion in the sinus region (K.P et al,
unpublished observations, 1999). There were differences in the
rate of lesion development along the aortic tree, with normally more
extensive lesions in the aortic arch and the proximal abdominal aorta
compared with the descending thoracic aorta. We therefore selected 3
regions for evaluation. In the arch, a major lesion was present at
the branching vessels and along the inner curvature of the aorta.
Similar to the procedure of Mach et al,34 we measured only
the lesions along the inner curvature because these showed little
variation between individuals. Lesion area is reported as the mean of 2
sections, 1 taken just distal to the origin of the brachiocephalic
trunk and the other, distal to the origin of the right common carotid
artery. In the descending thoracic aorta, lesion development in the
nonbranched regions was rare, whereas well-delineated lesions were
found around the ostia of the branching intercostal arteries. We
therefore estimated the mean cross-sectional area of the lesions around
the third pair of intercostals by taking 5 to 11 serial sections
100 mm apart through the entire lesion, estimating the
cross-sectional area in each section, and then calculating the mean
cross-sectional area of the lesions. In the abdominal aorta, 3 sections
were taken, the first just distal to the origin of the celiac artery
and the others, 100 and 200 mm distal to the first section,
because pilot experiments had indicated that these sites reflected
lesions associated with the ostia of the branching celiac artery.
However, the location of the branching vessels in this region differed
markedly between different mice used in the main study. In addition,
plaques associated with branching vessels other than the celiac artery
were also found in these sections of most animals, and the lesions had
often merged into 1 large(r) plaque. Because the number of branching
vessels markedly affects the size of the lesions, such animals were
omitted from analysis. When successful, the mean
cross-sectional area for the 3 sections was determined, and results are
expressed as the mean of the sections. Lesion assessment was carried
out in a blinded fashion and with the same equipment as described
previously.28 32
Statistical Analyses
Data on lesion size are presented as mean±SEM, and
effects of drug treatment were analyzed by a 2-way ANOVA (SAS
software), with drug treatment and aortic sites used as factors.
Because there was a significant interaction term between treatment and
site, treatment effect at each site measured was evaluated with
Students t test. The distribution of lesion size followed
a log-normal rather than a normal distribution. A log transformation of
the data could not be performed, however, because there were several
zero values (in the probucol group). We therefore performed the test
after assuming a normal distribution of the values, thereby reducing
the sensitivity of the test. Because we obtained only 3 mean values for
cross-sectional area from the abdominal aorta in the probucol group,
this site was not included in the statistical analyses.
Biochemical parameters were compared with the unpaired
Students t test. Statistical difference was accepted at
P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
ANOVA showed that probucol significantly but site-dependently affected
lesion size (Table I
), as indicated by a significant interaction
term (P=0.001). Direct comparisons showed significantly
smaller lesions in the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta in
probucol versus control mice (Table I
). The few results obtained
from the abdominal aorta also indicated an antiatherogenic effect of
probucol, although this site was not included in the statistical
analysis. Previous studies have reported that probucol enhances
lesion formation in the aortic root of female and male apoE-/- mice
fed normal chow.25 26 Consistent with that
finding, lesions at this site were larger in probucol than control male
mice fed a high-fat chow (Table I
), although this difference did
not reach statistical significance. Lesion size in the aortic root
varied in the probucol group (Table I
) owing to 2 animals with
no lesions at all (not shown), whereas all other drug-treated animals
had larger lesions than the largest individual control mouse. Table
I also shows that not only was the reported previously
lesion-enhancing effect of probucol 25 26 confined to the
aortic root region but also that probucol changed to become
increasingly more antiatherogenic the more distal the site examined
(Table I
). At the abdominal aorta, probucol effectively
prevented lesion formation.
Aortic Biochemistry
Because probucol may inhibit atherosclerosis by
inhibiting lipoprotein lipid oxidation,1 we measured the
contents of lipids and antioxidants in the entire aortas of control and
probucol-treated mice. As observed previously,28 feeding
apoE-/- mice a high-fat diet for 24 weeks substantially increased the
aortic content of lipoprotein-derived lipids, including C18:2 (the
major, readily oxidizable lipid) and
-tocopherol
(vitamin E; not shown). Tables II
and III
show the values expressed per protein
for the major lipids and antioxidants obtained after 24 weeks on the
high-fat diet. In addition to nonoxidized lipids, aortas also contained
LOOH and CE-OH (Table II
), despite the presence of substantial
amounts of the antioxidant vitamins E and C (Table III
). The
presence of LOOH was confirmed by HPLC with postchemiluminescence
detection, with chemiluminescence-positive signals being eliminated by
NaBH4 treatment of the sample (not
shown).33 Overall,
1% of the aortic lipid was oxidized
(Table II
), and aortas also contained ubiquinone-10 and
-tocopherylquinone, the oxidized forms of ubiquinol-10 and
-tocopherol, respectively (Table III
). These
findings fully agree with a previous report.28
|
|
Compared with controls, probucol significantly decreased the aortic
content of lipids and lipid-soluble antioxidants expressed per protein
(Tables II
and III
). For example, the concentrations
of cholesterol, vitamin E, and total coenzyme Q
(ubiquinones plus ubiquinols) decreased by 5.6-, 2.9-, and 2.5-fold,
respectively. This reduction in aortic lipids is consistent
with the lipid-lowering activity of probucol and the
histological results of the present study (Table
II and Figure
I). Probucol also significantly decreased
the aortic content of protein-standardized CE-OH and, where
analyzed, LOOH (Table II
). To assess whether this
change was the result of a lipid-lowering or an antioxidant activity of
probucol, we expressed the aortic content of oxidized lipids per CE
(Table IV
). As shown, probucol did not
affect the content of lipid-standardized oxidized lipids, indicating
that the drug acted as a lipid-lowering rather than an as antioxidant
agent. However, probucol increased the aortic concentration of the
water-soluble antioxidant ascorbate for unknown reasons. Probucol was
detected at
11-fold higher concentration than vitamin E, and
11%
of drug was metabolized to bisphenol or diphenoquinone.
|
Plasma Lipids
Plasma from probucol-treated mice had significantly less lipid
(Table II
) and vitamin E was decreased by
4-fold, whereas
ascorbate was increased by
1.4-fold and total coenzyme Q remained
unchanged (Table III
). Similar to the situation in the aorta,
probucol was present at an
13-fold higher concentration than
vitamin E, and
8% of the drug was converted into bisphenol or
diphenoquinone, suggesting that the metabolism of probucol
does not take place in the vessel wall. Compared with the aorta,
plasma contained only small amounts of CE-OH, and there was no
difference between the 2 groups. Furthermore, LOOH and
-tocopherylquinone were absent (Table III
), indicating that
lipoprotein oxidation in apoE-/- mice occurs within the vessel wall
rather than the circulation. Size-exclusion
chromatography showed that the majority of the
probucol-induced, lipid-lowering action was due to a decrease in VLDL,
with LDL and HDL remaining largely unchanged (Figure
II). Thus,
the content of cholesterol in VLDL from the probucol group
was decreased to 25% of the control value, reflecting the situation in
plasma (cf Tables II
and V
). HPLC
analysis also showed that the lipid-soluble antioxidants and
their metabolites were distributed more or less proportionally to the
cholesterol content of the lipoproteins (Table V
).
This scenario could explain why probucol lowered plasma vitamin E.
|
Plasma Lipoprotein Oxidizability
Enhanced resistance of plasma lipoproteins to oxidation is often
used as a measure of antioxidant efficacy. Therefore, we examined
AAPH-induced oxidation of pooled plasma from control and treated
animals. Consistent with a previous report,28
exposure of control plasma to this oxidant resulted in the
time-dependent and concomitant consumption of ascorbate (Figure
IIIA) and of ubiquinols-9 and -10 (Figure
IIIB). Ubiquinols were converted
stoichiometrically to the corresponding ubiquinones (data not shown).
As expected from the increased starting concentration, the time
required for ascorbate depletion was increased somewhat in the probucol
group (Figure
IIIA), and this divergence was reflected in an
increase in the time required for the complete consumption of
ubiquinols (Figure
IIIB). On depletion of ascorbate and
ubiquinols, bisphenol (filled triangles in Figure
IIIC) was oxidized to
diphenoquinone (not shown). Thereafter, plasma vitamin E (squares in
Figure
IIIC) decreased, concomitant with the accumulation of
CE-O(O)H (Figure
IIID), the onset and initial rate of which
were delayed and decreased, respectively, in plasma from
probucol-treated mice (Figure
IIID). Although probucol
significantly lowered plasma
-tocopherol (Table
III), there was no significant difference in the onset of
oxidation and the proportion to which the vitamin was consumed in
plasma from control and probucol-treated mice (Figure
IIIC).
Probucol (cross-hatched squares in Figure
IIIC) remained
unchanged throughout the oxidation period examined. These observations
can be explained readily on the basis of
tocopherol-mediated peroxidation.9 36 The data
indicate that the increased concentration of ascorbate and the presence
of the probucol metabolite bisphenol, rather than probucol itself,
afforded an enhanced resistance of plasma lipids to ex vivo oxidation
induced by AAPH. Such enhanced resistance of lipids to oxidation was
observed despite a substantial decrease in plasma vitamin E for the
probucol treatment group, thereby emphasizing the importance of
coantioxidants such as vitamin C and bisphenol rather than absolute
concentrations of vitamin E as being important in providing effective
antioxidant protection to plasma lipoprotein lipids.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A major aim of the present study was to assess and compare the extent of disease and primary lipoprotein lipid (per)oxidation in the vasculature. Given the previous observation that probucol increased lesion size despite decreasing plasma lipid in apoE-/- mice,25 26 we anticipated to use these animals as a model to study the relationship between antioxidants, lipid peroxidation, and lesion formation in a situation wherein atherogenesis is promoted. Contrary to our expectation, probucol inhibited atherosclerosis overall, and the material used for biochemical analysis in the present study included the entire aorta. Consistent with the histology results, probucol decreased the aortic content of nonoxidized lipids and primary products of lipoprotein oxidation in the form of LOOH and CE-OH. A previous study had shown that probucol decreased the content of oxysterols (that are secondary lipid oxidation products) in rabbit aortas.37 In contrast, OBrien et al38 did not observe a decrease in oxidized LDL in plaques of LDL receptordeficient rabbits fed probucol. However, in that study, the tissue sections used were fixed, and this process could have caused inadvertent lipid oxidation (see Methods). Together, our results are consistent with, though do not prove, the concept that the absolute amount of oxidized lipids in the vessel may be a trigger for lesion growth.
Importantly however, probucol decreased the amounts of oxidized lipids
in the vessel wall by lowering the substrate pool of nonoxidized lipids
rather than by acting as an antioxidant (Table IV
). This
apparent lack of antioxidant protection of polyunsaturated lipids is
consistent with the inability of probucol to inhibit
AAPH-induced oxidation of lipoprotein lipids in the presence of vitamin
E.9 36 Aortic vitamin E was not depleted in control mice,
and although substantially decreased in mice treated with probucol,
lipid-adjusted concentrations of vitamin E remained high (Tables
II and III). This finding, together with the fact that
the extent of lipid oxidation measured in the vessel wall was several
orders of magnitude higher than that in plasma (Table II
),
suggests that lipoprotein lipid peroxidation likely proceeded within
the aorta and in the presence of
-tocopherol (also see
Reference 28 ). Aortas contained bisphenol (Table
3), which inhibits tocopherol-mediated
peroxidation and aortic lipoprotein oxidation in apoE-/- LDL
receptordeficient mice.32 However, as judged by their
respective plasma levels, the bisphenol concentration required for this
effect was above that observed in the present study. This reasoning
may explain why probucol failed to decrease the relative extent of
aortic lipid oxidation despite the presence of some bisphenol in the
vessel.
The relative importance of absolute versus proportional extent of lipoprotein lipid oxidation to atherogenesis is not known. If the latter were important, our results would suggest that probucol inhibited disease by means other than inhibition of aortic lipoprotein lipid oxidation. This would represent a second example of dissociation of these 2 processes. We have shown recently that in LDL receptordeficient rabbits, the accumulation of lipoprotein LOOH and CE-OH is dissociated from atherosclerosis.39 Future studies will have to address how important aortic lipoprotein lipid oxidation is as a cause of atherosclerosis in apoE-/- mice. Interestingly, in humans, probucol prevented restenosis after coronary angioplasty, whereas an antioxidant multivitamin cocktail was without benefit and reversed the effect of probucol.17 On the basis of this result, the authors argued that the effect of probucol was independent of its antioxidant activity.
The apparent lack of antioxidant protection of aortic lipids by
probucol raises the question of how the drug inhibited
atherosclerosis so effectively in most parts of the
aorta. As in other animals (see, eg, Reference 12 ),
probucol substantially decreased plasma lipids in the apoE-/- mice
used in the current experiment. This observation represents a
confounding factor when considering the relation between lesion
formation and lipid (per)oxidation (see above). However, it is not
immediately obvious how lipid lowering alone could explain the observed
caudal increase in inhibition of atherosclerosis (Table
I) or the increase in lesion size in the aortic origin by
probucol.25 26
Several explanations have been proposed for the proatherogenic activity of probucol in the aortic root, including the lowering of HDL,24 26 probucol toxicity, increased plasma fibrinogen, and decreased plasma lipoprotein lipase activities.26 However, in the present study, probucol did not lower HDL. Others have suggested that in rabbits, probucol may be antiatherogenic by increasing the activity of CE transfer protein.40 Although we did not measure this activity, blood parameters alone are not likely to explain the site-specific proatherogenic or antiatherogenic effect of probucol, as all sites are exposed to the same blood.
The site-specific effects of probucol may be explained by local differences in hemodynamic factors, such as shear stress and/or characteristics of the vessel wall, although this hypothesis requires future investigations. Probucol inhibits the secretion of interleukin-1 from macrophages,41 the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and macrophage-colony stimulating factor in the artery wall,42 and the adhesion of macrophages to the endothelium.15 43 Because vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression is correlated with and can contribute to the entry of macrophages into the intima,44 its downregulation by probucol could attenuate atherosclerosis by decreasing the intimal accumulation of macrophages.38 The expression of adhesion molecules44 and the distribution of inflammatory cells within the vessel wall45 are affected by arterial blood flow, so that these local differences in hemodynamic factors could be relevant.
Alternatively, probucol may act only on certain atherogenic processes or on certain stages of atherogenesis, and this may explain the differences observed. For example, there is evidence14 19 21 that probucol prevents lesion growth but does not cause lesion regression (see, however, Reference 40 ). Lesion development in apoE-/- mice is observed first in the aortic root and later distally along the aortic tree.35 Hence, the proatherogenic22 23 24 and antiatherogenic activity of probucol (this study) at the most proximal and distal sites, respectively, could be explained if lesions existed in the aortic origin but not along the transverse, descending, and abdominal aorta before the intervention. The treatment period of our study was sufficiently long to allow growth of lesions at all sites studied. Lesion growth in the descending thoracic aorta, though later in onset than that in the proximal aorta, is comparatively fast,28 31 and this difference in growth could explain the more effective antiatherogenic activity of probucol in the dorsal aorta. However, lesions were barely detectable in the aortic root of our apoE-/- mice at 10 weeks of age28 when the animals started to receive probucol. Therefore, a lack of effect on preexisting lesions is unlikely to explain the proatherogenic effect of probucol at the aortic origin.
Zhang et al25 were the first to demonstrate a proatherogenic effect of probucol on lesion formation in the aortic root of apoE-/- mice. Those authors also reported that in a subset of 5 probucol-treated female mice, the lesion area in the descending aorta was 4 times larger than that in 4 untreated animals.25 Moghadasian et al26 reported that "thoracic aortas from the probucol-treated animals showed severe atherosclerotic lesions," although those authors did not directly compare the extent of lesion formation in the descending aorta of probucol and control mice. At present, we cannot explain the discrepancy between the proatherogenic effect reported by Zhang et al25 and the strong antiatherogenic effect observed in the present study for probucol in the descending aorta. A marked difference in the 2 studies is that Zhang et al25 used normal chow (for 3 months), whereas our animals were fed a high-fat diet (for 6 months). Thus, it is possible that the antiatherosclerotic effect of probucol in apoE-/- mice is related to severe hypercholesterolemia and/or its consequences on the aortic vessel wall.
A limitation of the present study is that the biochemical
analyses could not be performed on the aortas used for
histology, so that our interpretations rely on comparisons between
different animals (albeit treated under identical conditions). Also,
the required use of pooled aortas precludes any systematic correlation
between lesion size and aortic biochemical parameters.
Another limitation is that we did not measure secondary products of
lipid peroxidation, such as malondialdehyde-lysine adducts, or those
derived from oxidized phospholipids that are present in human and
rabbit lesions.2 46 However, these products derive
from primary lipid peroxidation products that we did measure and
are formed at substantial quantities only after the depletion of
-tocopherol,8 whereas aortic vitamin E was
clearly not depleted (Table III
). Therefore, LOOH
fragmentation may not be a major event in lipoprotein lipid oxidation
in the vessel wall of apoE-/- mice. Nevertheless, it will be
important in future studies to test whether probucol affects secondary
lipid oxidation and/or protein oxidation and, if so, how this relates
to atherogenesis.
The observation that probucol shows site-differential effects on atherosclerosis raises interesting questions about local factors that contribute to the disease. The relevance of the disease-promoting effect of probucol in the aortic root25 26 is, however, questionable, given that vascular events in humans generally result from lesions in the abdominal aorta and medium-size arteries. Therefore, our finding that probucol inhibits atherosclerosis in the majority of the aorta indicates that this drug can be antiatherogenic in this animal model.
|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 12, 2000; accepted March 17, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ylä-Herttuala S, Palinski W, Rosenfeld ME, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Butler S, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Evidence for the presence of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein in atherosclerotic lesions of rabbit and man. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:10861095.
3. Hazell LJ, Arnold L, Flowers D, Waeg G, Malle E, Stocker R. Presence of hypochlorite-modified proteins in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:15351544.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Hazen SL, Heinecke JW. 3-Chlorotyrosine, a specific marker of myeloperoxidase-catalyzed oxidation, is markedly elevated in low density lipoprotein isolated from human atherosclerotic intima. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:20752081.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Smith EB, Slater RS. The chemical and immunological assay of low density lipoprotein extracted from human aortic intima. Atherosclerosis. 1970;11:417438.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Suarna C, Dean RT, May J, Stocker R. Human
atherosclerotic plaque contains both oxidized lipids and relatively
large amounts of
-tocopherol and ascorbate.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:16161624.
7.
Niu X, Zammit V, Upston JM, Dean RT, Stocker R.
Coexistence of oxidized lipids and
-tocopherol in
all lipoprotein fractions isolated from advanced human atherosclerotic
plaques. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:17081718.
8. Esterbauer H, Gebicki J, Puhl H, Jürgens G. The role of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in oxidative modification of LDL. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992;13:341390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Upston JM, Terentis AC, Stocker R.
Tocopherol-mediated peroxidation (TMP) of lipoproteins:
implications for vitamin E as a potential antiatherogenic supplement.
FASEB J. 1999;13:977994.
10.
Steinbrecher UP, Lougheed M, Kwan W-C, Dirks M.
Recognition of oxidized low density lipoprotein by the scavenger
receptor of macrophages results from derivatization of
apolipoprotein B by products of fatty acid peroxidation.
J Biol Chem. 1989;264:1521615223.
11. Barnhart JW, Sefranka JA, McIntosh DD. Hypocholesterolemic effect of 4,4'-(isopropylidenedithio)-bis(2,6-di-t-butylphenol) (Probucol). Am J Clin Nutr. 1970;23:12291233.[Abstract]
12.
Kita T, Nagano Y, Yokode M, Ishii K, Kume N, Ooshima A,
Yoshida H, Kawai C. Probucol prevents the progression of
atherosclerosis in Watanabe heritable
hyperlipidemic rabbit, an animal model for familial
hypercholesterolemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1987;84:59285931.
13.
Carew TE, Schwenke DC, Steinberg D. Antiatherogenic
effect of probucol unrelated to its hypocholesterolemic
effect: evidence that antioxidants in vivo can selectively
inhibit low density lipoprotein degradation in macrophage-rich
fatty streaks and slow the progression of
atherosclerosis in the Watanabe heritable
hyperlipidemic rabbit. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1987;84:77257729.
14. Sasahara M, Raines EW, Chait A, Carew TE, Steinberg D, Wahl PW, Ross R. Inhibition of hypercholesterolemia-induced atherosclerosis in the nonhuman primate by probucol, I: is the extent of atherosclerosis related to resistance of LDL to oxidation? J Clin Invest. 1994;94:155164.
15.
Ferns GAA, Forster L, Steward-Lee A, Konneh M,
Nourooz-Zadeh J, Änggåd EE. Probucol inhibits
neointimal thickening and macrophage accumulation
after balloon injury in the cholesterol-fed rabbit.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:1131211316.
16.
Schneider JE, Berk BC, Gravanis MB, Santoian EC,
Cipolla GD, Tarazona N, Lassegue B, King SB 3rd. Probucol decreases
neointimal formation in a swine model of coronary
artery balloon injury: a possible role for antioxidants in
restenosis. Circulation. 1993;88:628637.
17.
Tardif J-C, Côté G, Lespérance J,
Bourassa M, Lambert J, Doucet S, Bilodeau L, Nattel S, de Guise P.
Probucol and multivitamins in the prevention of restenosis
after coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:365372.
18. Nagano Y, Nakamura T, Matsuzawa Y, Cho M, Ueda Y, Kita T. Probucol and atherosclerosis in the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit: long-term antiatherogenic effect and effects on established plaques. Atherosclerosis. 1992;92:131140.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Kajinami K, Nishitsuji M, Takeda Y, Shimizu M, Koizumi J, Mabuchi H. Long-term probucol treatment results in regression of xanthomas, but in progression of coronary atherosclerosis in a heterozygous patient with familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 1996;120:181187.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Stein Y, Stein O, Delplanque B, Fesmire JD, Lee DM, Alaupovic P. Lack of effect of probucol on atheroma formation in cholesterol-fed rabbits kept at comparable plasma cholesterol levels. Atherosclerosis. 1989;75:145155.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Daugherty A, Zweifel BS, Schonfeld G. The effects of probucol on the progression of atherosclerosis in mature Watanabe heritable hyperlipidaemic rabbits. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;103:10131018.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Bird DA, Tangirala RK, Fruebis J, Steinberg D, Witztum
JL, Palinski W. Effect of probucol on LDL oxidation and
atherosclerosis in LDL receptor deficient mice. J
Lipid Res. 1998;39:10791090.
23. Benson GM, Schiffelers R, Nicols C, Latchman J, Vidgeon-Hart M, Toseland CDN, Suckling KE, Groot PHE. Effect of probucol on serum lipids, atherosclerosis and toxicology in fat-fed LDL receptor deficient mice. Atherosclerosis. 1998;141:237247.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Cynshi O, Kawabe Y, Suzuki T, Takashima Y, Kaise H,
Nakamura M, Ohba Y, Kato Y, Tamura K, Hayasaka A, Higashida A,
Sakaguchi H, Takeya M, Takahashi K, Inoue K, Noguchi N, Niki E, Kodama
T. Antiatherogenic effects of the antioxidant BO-653 in three different
animal models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1012310128.
25. Zhang SH, Reddick RL, Avdievich E, Surles LK, Jones RG, Reynolds JB, Quarfordt SH, Maeda N. Paradoxical enhancement of atherosclerosis by probucol treatment in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:28582866.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Moghadasian MH, McManus BM, Godin DV, Rodrigues B,
Frohlich JJ. Proatherogenic and antiatherogenic effects of probucol and
phytosterols in apolipoprotein Edeficient mice: possible mechanisms
of action. Circulation. 1999;99:17331739.
27.
Palinski W, Ord VA, Plump AS, Breslow JL, Steinberg D,
Witztum JL. AopE-deficient mice are a model of lipoprotein oxidation in
atherogenesis: demonstration of oxidation-specific epitopes in lesions
and high titers of autoantibodies to malondialdehyde-lysine in serum.
Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:605616.
28.
Letters JM, Witting PK, Christison JK, Westin Eriksson
A, Pettersson K, Stocker R. Changes to lipids and antioxidants in
plasma and aortae of apoE-deficient mice. J Lipid Res. 1999;40:11041112.
29. Pelter A, Elgendy S. Phenolic oxidation with (diacetoxyiodo)benzene. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988;29:677680.
30. Sattler W, Mohr D, Stocker R. Rapid isolation of lipoproteins and assessment of their peroxidation by HPLC postcolumn chemiluminescence. Methods Enzymol. 1994;233:469489.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Piedrahita JA, Zhang SH, Hagaman JR, Oliver PM, Maeda
N. Generation of mice carrying a mutant apolipoprotein E gene
inactivated by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:44714475.
32.
Witting PK, Pettersson K, Östlund-Lindqvist A-M,
Westerlund C, Westin Eriksson A, Stocker R. Inhibition by a
co-antioxidant of aortic lipoprotein lipid peroxidation and
atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E and low density
lipoprotein receptor gene double knockout mice. FASEB J. 1999;13:667675.
33. Frei B, Yamamoto Y, Niclas D, Ames BN. Evaluation of an isoluminol chemiluminescence assay for the detection of hydroperoxides in human blood plasma. Anal Biochem. 1988;175:120130.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Mach F, Schonbeck U, Sukhova GK, Atkinson E, Libby P. Reduction of atherosclerosis in mice by inhibition of CD40 signalling. Nature. 1998;394:200203.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Nakashima Y, Plump AS, Raines EW, Breslow JL, Ross R.
Apo-E deficient mice develop lesions of all phases of
atherosclerosis throughout the arterial
tree. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:133140.
36. Bowry VW, Stocker R. Tocopherol-mediated peroxidation: the pro-oxidant effect of vitamin E on the radical-initiated oxidation of human low-density lipoprotein. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:60296044.
37. Hodis HN, Chauhan A, Hashimoto S, Crawford DW, Sevanian A. Probucol reduces plasma and aortic wall oxysterol levels in cholesterol-fed rabbits independently of its plasma cholesterol lowering effect. Atherosclerosis. 1992;96:125134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
OBrien K, Nagano Y, Gown A, Kita T, Chait A. Probucol
treatment affects the cellular composition but not anti-oxidized low
density lipoprotein immunoreactivity of plaques from Watanabe heritable
hyperlipidemic rabbits. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:751759.
39. Witting PK, Pettersson K, Östlund-Lindqvist A-M, Westerlund C, Wagberg M, Stocker R. Dissociation of atherogenesis from aortic accumulation of lipid hydro(pero)xides in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:213220.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Oshima R, Ikeda T, Watanabe K, Itakura H, Sugiyama N. Probucol treatment attenuates the aortic atherosclerosis in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Atherosclerosis. 1998;137:1322.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Ku G, Doherty NS, Schmidt LF, Jackson RL, Dinerstein RJ. Ex vivo lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-1 secretion from murine peritoneal macrophages inhibited by probucol, a hypocholesterolemic agent with antioxidant properties. FASEB J. 1990;4:16451653.[Abstract]
42.
Fruebis J, Gonzalez V, Silvestre M, Palinski W. Effect
of probucol treatment on gene expression of VCAM-1, MCP-1, and M-CSF in
the aortic wall of LDL receptor-deficient rabbits during early
atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:12891302.
43. Ferns GA, Forster L, Stewart-Lee A, Nourooz-Zadeh J, Anggard EE. Probucol inhibits mononuclear cell adhesion to vascular endothelium in the cholesterol-fed rabbit. Atherosclerosis. 1993;100:171181.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Walpola PL, Gotlieb AI, Cybulsky MI, Langille BL.
Expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and monocyte adherence in arteries
exposed to altered shear stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
Biol. 1995;15:210.
45.
Dirksen MT, van der Wal AC, van den Berg FM, van der
Loos CM, Becker AE. Distribution of inflammatory cells in
atherosclerotic plaques relates to the direction of flow.
Circulation. 1998;98:20002003.
46.
Watson AD, Leitinger N, Navab M, Faull KF, Horkko S,
Witztum JL, Palinski W, Schwenke D, Salomon RG, Sha W, Subbanagounder
G, Fogelman AM, Berliner JA. Structural identification by mass
spectrometry of oxidized phospholipids in minimally oxidized low
density lipoprotein that induce monocyte/endothelial
interactions and evidence for their presence in vivo. J Biol
Chem. 1997;272:1359713607.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. J. Wu, N. Di Girolamo, K. Beck, C. G. Hanratty, K. Choy, J. Y. Hou, M. R. Ward, and R. Stocker Probucol [4,4'-[(1-Methylethylidene)bis(thio)]bis-[2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol]] Inhibits Compensatory Remodeling and Promotes Lumen Loss Associated with Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 477 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Wu, K. Kathir, P. K. Witting, K. Beck, K. Choy, C. Li, K. D. Croft, T. A. Mori, D. Tanous, M. R. Adams, et al. Antioxidants protect from atherosclerosis by a heme oxygenase-1 pathway that is independent of free radical scavenging J. Exp. Med., April 17, 2006; 203(4): 1117 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Choy, K. Beck, F. Y. Png, B. J. Wu, S. B. Leichtweis, S. R. Thomas, J. Y. Hou, K. D. Croft, T. A. Mori, and R. Stocker Processes Involved in the Site-Specific Effect of Probucol on Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E Gene Knockout Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2005; 25(8): 1684 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Teupser, S. Pavlides, M. Tan, J.-C. Gutierrez-Ramos, R. Kolbeck, and J. L. Breslow Major reduction of atherosclerosis in fractalkine (CX3CL1)-deficient mice is at the brachiocephalic artery, not the aortic root PNAS, December 21, 2004; 101(51): 17795 - 17800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Stocker and J. F. Keaney Jr. Role of Oxidative Modifications in Atherosclerosis Physiol Rev, October 1, 2004; 84(4): 1381 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Stocker and R. A O'Halloran Dealcoholized red wine decreases atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E gene-deficient mice independently of inhibition of lipid peroxidation in the artery wall Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2004; 79(1): 123 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bro, J. F. Bentzon, E. Falk, C. B. Andersen, K. Olgaard, and L. B. Nielsen Chronic Renal Failure Accelerates Atherogenesis in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 2466 - 2474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Reardon, L. Blachowicz, J. Lukens, M. Nissenbaum, and G. S. Getz Genetic Background Selectively Influences Innominate Artery Atherosclerosis: Immune System Deficiency as a Probe Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(8): 1449 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Braun, S. Zhang, H. E. Miettinen, S. Ebrahim, T. M. Holm, E. Vasile, M. J. Post, D. M. Yoerger, M. H. Picard, J. L. Krieger, et al. Probucol prevents early coronary heart disease and death in the high-density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI/apolipoprotein E double knockout mouse PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 7283 - 7288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wagberg, A.-H. Jansson, C. Westerlund, A.-M. Ostlund-Lindqvist, B. Sarnstrand, H. Bergstrand, and K. Pettersson N,N'-Diacetyl-L-cystine (DiNAC), the Disulphide Dimer of N-Acetylcysteine, Inhibits Atherosclerosis in WHHL Rabbits: Evidence for Immunomodulatory Agents as a New Approach to Prevent Atherosclerosis J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2001; 299(1): 76 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Reardon, L. Blachowicz, T. White, V. Cabana, Y. Wang, J. Lukens, J. Bluestone, and G. S. Getz Effect of Immune Deficiency on Lipoproteins and Atherosclerosis in Male Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2001; 21(6): 1011 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Thomas, S. B. Leichtweis, K. Pettersson, K. D. Croft, T. A. Mori, A. J. Brown, and R. Stocker Dietary Cosupplementation With Vitamin E and Coenzyme Q10 Inhibits Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E Gene Knockout Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2001; 21(4): 585 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Getz Mouse Model of Unstable Atherosclerotic Plaque? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2000; 20(12): 2503 - 2505. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Takabe, T. Kodama, T. Hamakubo, K. Tanaka, T. Suzuki, H. Aburatani, N. Matsukawa, and N. Noguchi Anti-atherogenic Antioxidants Regulate the Expression and Function of Proteasome alpha -Type Subunits in Human Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2001; 276(44): 40497 - 40501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |