Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Division of Biopharmaceutics (N.H., M.V.E., T.J.C.V.B.), Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Sylvius Laboratories, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; the Department of Vascular Biology (P.H.E.G.), SmithKline Beecham Research and Development, Harlow, Essex, UK; and the Department of Pediatric Oncology (P.M.H.), St. Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to M. Van Eck, Division of Biopharmaceutics, Sylvius Laboratories, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 72, 2333 AL Leiden, Netherlands. E-mail M.Eck{at}LACDR.LeidenUniv.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: LDL receptor atherosclerosis macrophages gene transfer
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Macrophage-derived foam cells play an important role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis.7 One of the best characterized mechanisms by which macrophages in the artery wall become foam cells is the uptake of modified LDL via the scavenger receptormediated pathway.8 The direct role of the LDLr on macrophages in the formation of atherosclerosis is not yet established, because it is assumed that downregulation of the LDLr by cellular cholesterol will limit its role in foam cell formation.9 In vitro, however, the expression of the LDLr was demonstrated on foam cells extracted from the human artery wall.10 Furthermore, it has been shown that the LDLr on cultured macrophages is involved in the internalization of atherogenic ß-VLDL, which can induce cholesteryl ester (CE) accumulation.11 12 We and others have recently transferred wild-type LDLr(+/+) cells into LDLr(-/-) mice via bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in vivo and investigated the effects on hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis.13 14 15 Transplantation of wild-type bone marrow into LDLr(-/-) mice resulted in a temporary decrease of total serum cholesterol. The mean atherosclerotic lesion area of these transplanted mice fed a cholesterol-rich diet was not different from that of control LDLr(-/-) mice that were transplanted with LDLr(-/-) bone marrow. We speculated that in LDLr(-/-) mice transplanted with wild-type bone marrow, the LDLr is downregulated by the relatively high concentrations of circulating cholesterol.
In the present study, we investigated the role of the macrophage LDLr under less extreme cholesterol conditions to circumvent the possible downregulation of the LDLr. Therefore, we performed the complementary experiment of transplanting LDLr(-/-) bone marrow into C57Bl/6 mice recipients. The absence of the LDLr on macrophages caused a 2.9-fold decrease of mean atherosclerotic lesion area, whereas the total serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels were not significantly different from those of the control transplanted mice.
Thus, our results indicate that the LDLr on macrophages can facilitate foam cell formation and, therefore, can contribute to the atherosclerotic process under conditions of modestly high cholesterol levels.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Irradiation and BMT
Female recipient mice, aged 6 to 8 weeks, were subjected to 13
Gy of total body irradiation (roentgen source). Bone marrow was
harvested by flushing femurs and tibias of 8- to 10-week-old male donor
mice with cold PBS. The cells were washed twice with PBS. Recipients
received 1x107 bone marrow cells by tail vein
injection 24 hours after irradiation.
Serum Cholesterol and Triglyceride Analysis
After an overnight fasting period, small blood samples (50 µL)
were obtained by tail bleeding. The concentrations of total
cholesterol and triglycerides in the sera were
determined by using enzymatic procedures (Boehringer-Mannheim).
Precipath (standardized serum, Boehringer-Mannheim) was used as
an internal standard.
The distribution of cholesterol over the different lipoproteins was determined by loading 30 µL serum of each individual mouse onto a Sepharose 6 column (3.2x30 mm, Smart-system, Pharmacia). The serum was fractionated at a constant flow rate of 50 µL/min by use of PBS containing 1 mmol/L EDTA. Twenty-eight fractions of 50 µL were collected. The fractions were assayed for their total cholesterol content.
Analysis of Atherosclerosis
The mice were killed, and the hearts and vascular trees were
perfused in situ with oxygenated Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate
buffer at 37°C under a pressure of 100 mm Hg for 30 minutes via
a cannula in the left ventricle. The buffer was then replaced by 3.7%
neutral-buffered formalin (3.7% formaldehyde, Formal-fix, Shandon
Scientific Ltd), and the tissue was fixated during a perfusion of 30
minutes. Hearts and aortas were excised and stored in formalin. The
hearts were bisected just below the atria, and the base of the heart
and aortic root were taken for analysis. Cryostat 10-µm cross
sections of the aortic root were taken and stained with oil red O as
described before.17 Atherosclerotic lesions in the
sections were quantified by using a light microscope connected with a
video camera and by running Optimas software, version 6.1 (Bioscan
Inc). Mean lesion area was calculated from the first 10 sections in the
direction of the aortic arch from the point at which all 3 aortic valve
leaflets first appeared as previously described.17
Immunohistochemistry
Macrophages were detected in atherosclerotic lesions by
immunolocalization of the MOMA-2 macrophage marker.
Formaldehyde-fixated cryostat sections were
permeabilized, washed with PBS, and incubated for 1
hour in blocking buffer (PBS, 1% blocking reagent for ELISA, and 5%
normal goat serum, pH 7.4). Subsequently, the sections were incubated
with rat anti-mouse MOMA-2 antiserum (dilution 1:10 in blocking buffer)
for 1 hour at room temperature and overnight at 4°C. After they were
washed, the sections were exposed for 1 hour to goat anti-rabbit IgG
conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (dilution 1:200 in blocking buffer,
Sigma Chemical Co). Thereafter, sections were extensively washed with
washing buffer, and MOMA-2positive macrophages were
visualized by incubation with BCIP/NBT alkaline phosphatase substrate
(Sigma) in 0.2 mol/L Tris-HCl and 10 mmol/L
MgCl2, pH 9.6.
The presence of the LDLr in atherosclerotic lesions was assessed immunohistochemically with a rabbit anti-rat LDLr antiserum, which cross-reacts with the murine LDLr (kindly provided by Dr A. Cooper, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, Calif). Formaldehyde-fixated cryostat sections were permeabilized, washed with PBS, and subsequently incubated for 0.5 hours with 0.3% H2O2 and 1 hour with blocking buffer. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with rabbit anti-rat LDLr antiserum (1:50 in blocking buffer) for 1 hour at room temperature and overnight at 4°C. After they were washed, the sections were exposed to biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (dilution 1:200 in blocking buffer, Dako), washed, and incubated with biotinylated horseradish peroxidaseconjugated streptavidin (Amersham International Plc). Thereafter, sections were extensively washed with PBS, and LDLr-positive areas were visualized by incubation with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma) as a horseradish peroxidase substrate in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 7% sucrose, and 0.03% H2O2.
Isolation and Labeling of Lipoproteins
ß-VLDL was obtained from rats that were fed a diet containing
2% cholesterol, 5% olive oil, and 0.5% bile acid for 2
weeks. The rats were fasted overnight, after which blood was collected
by puncture of the abdominal aorta. The sera were pooled and
centrifuged at 250 000g in a discontinuous KBr
gradient for 18 hours as reported by Redgrave et
al.18 The top fraction (density <1.006 g/mL) was
dialyzed against PBS containing 1 mmol/L EDTA. The composition of
ß-VLDL was 14.6±2.1% triacylglycerols,
15.8±1.1% phospholipids, 49.4±3.1% CEs, 9.9±1.0% free
cholesterol, and 10.3±0.7% protein. ß-VLDL was labeled
with 125I at pH 10.0 according to
McFarlane,19 as described earlier.20 Free
125I was removed by Sephadex G50 gel filtration,
followed by dialysis against PBS containing 1 mmol/L EDTA. Human
LDL was isolated from healthy volunteers as described by Redgrave et
al18 and subsequently acetylated according to Basu
et al.21
Peritoneal Macrophage Harvesting
Five days after peritoneal injection of 1 mL of 3% Brewer
thioglycollate medium (Difco), peritoneal macrophages were
harvested by lavage of the peritoneal cavity with 10 mL PBS/1
mmol/L EDTA. After 3 washing steps, the cells
(0.5x106) were plated out in 25-mm multiwell
culture dishes with DMEM (Bio-Whittaker) containing 10% FCS, 2
mmol/L glutamine, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 100 IU/mL penicillin.
After 4 hours, the nonadherent cells were removed by washing, and the
culture medium was replaced by DMEM containing 10% human
lipoprotein-deficient serum, 2 mmol/L glutamine, 100 µg/mL
streptomycin, and 100 IU/mL penicillin. The cells were cultured for 2
days.
Peritoneal Macrophage Metabolism Studies
ß-VLDL association and degradation studies were carried out
with the indicated amounts of 125I-ß-VLDL for 3
hours at 37°C. Incubations of the cells were performed in DMEM
(Bio-Whittaker) containing 2% (wt/vol) BSA (Sigma) in a total volume
of 0.5 mL. After incubation, the cells were washed 3 times with washing
buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 0.9% NaCl, 1
mmol/L EDTA, 5 mmol/L CaCl2, and 0.2%
[wt/vol] BSA), followed by 2 washing steps with washing buffer
without BSA. The cells were lysed in 0.1 mol/L NaOH, and the
radioactivity was determined. Cell protein was measured by the method
of Lowry et al22 with BSA as a standard. Degradation of
the radiolabeled ß-VLDL was determined by precipitation with
trichloroacetic acid as described by Henriksen et al.23
Intracellular lipid accumulation in macrophages after a 24-hour
incubation with 50 µg/mL ß-VLDL or 100 µg/mL acetylated
LDL was determined as described by Havekes et al.24
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of the data was performed by
unpaired Student t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During the weeks after BMT, the total serum cholesterol
level was repeatedly determined. No significant differences between
LDLr(-/-)
C57Bl/6 and C57Bl/6
C57Bl/6 could be observed at 4 and
8 weeks after BMT. The cholesterol level at these time
points did not differ significantly from the level measured before
transplantation (data not shown). To induce atherosclerotic lesion
formation, the transplanted mice were fed an atherogenic diet
containing 1% (wt/wt) cholesterol and 0.5% (wt/wt) cholic
acid, starting at 8 weeks after transplantation. To induce
atherosclerosis in this animal model, the mice were fed
an atherogenic diet containing 1% (wt/wt) cholesterol and
0.5% (wt/wt) cholic acid. Although the use of such diets has been
criticized for their possible inflammatory effects,25
their use is commonly accepted as an experimental tool to evaluate
atherosclerotic lesion development in resistant mouse
strains.26 27 28 As a result, the total serum
cholesterol levels in the control and experimental groups
increased
3-fold (Figure 1
). The
triglyceride levels decreased
4-fold in both groups
(data not shown). The distribution of cholesterol among
serum lipoproteins was analyzed by liquid
chromatography. The lipoprotein profiles of the 2
groups were essentially identical on a standard chow diet (Figure 2A
). After 12 weeks on the atherogenic
diet, in both groups, cholesterol in the VLDL and IDL/LDL
fractions increased
10-fold, and there was a 2-fold reduction of
cholesterol in the HDL fraction (Figure 2B
). No
significant differences between the lipoprotein profiles of the 2
groups were observed. To determine the effects of LDLr deficiency in
macrophages on the formation of atherosclerotic lesions, the
hearts and aortas of the mice were perfused and fixed after 3 months of
the atherogenic diet. Cryostat cross sections of the aortic root were
stained with oil red O. Representative photomicrographs
of the aortic valves of control transplanted mice and mice transplanted
with LDLr-deficient bone marrow are shown in Figure 3
. The mean atherosclerotic lesion area
in the aortic root was calculated and is presented in Figure 4
. The mean±SD lesion area was 2.9-fold
smaller in LDLr(-/-)
C57Bl/6 mice (n=14) than in C57Bl/6
C57Bl/6
mice (n=16); the respective areas were 34 680±22 401 and
100 846±33 043 µm2
(P<0.001). No correlation between the individual serum
cholesterol levels and the mean lesion area could be
observed. Staining of the atherosclerotic lesion areas for MOMA-2, a
specific marker for macrophages, revealed that in both
transplantation groups, the atherosclerotic lesion area consisted
primarily of lipid-filled macrophages (Figure 5A
and 5B
). No qualitative difference in
lesion composition was observed between the 2 groups. Furthermore,
serial sections of the aortic root were analyzed for the
presence of the macrophage LDLr (with the use of rabbit
anti-rat LDLr antiserum) that cross-reacts with the murine LDLr. Foam
cells in lesions of C57Bl/6
C57Bl/6 mice stained extensively for the
presence of the LDLr, whereas only some foam cells stained for
the presence of the LDLr in LDLr(-/-)
C57Bl/6 mice (Figure
5C and 5D). Analysis of more advanced foam
cellrich lesions of C57Bl/6
C57Bl/6 mice revealed that the LDLr is
downregulated during the progression of lesion development (data not
shown). Thus, it appears that the introduction of LDLr(-/-) bone
marrow into C57Bl/6 mice results in a reduction of atherosclerotic
lesion development that is due to decreased numbers of LDLr-expressing
macrophages without affecting cholesterol and
triglyceride levels significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
To elucidate the potential mechanism by which the LDLr on
macrophages can contribute to foam cell formation, we studied
the in vitro uptake of atherogenic ß-VLDL by thioglycollate-elicited
peritoneal macrophages of C57Bl/6 and LDLr(-/-) mice.
Previous studies showed that the uptake of ß-VLDL by murine
peritoneal macrophages is mediated predominantly by a so-called
unusual LDLr. This unusual LDLr differs from the classic LDLr, as
described in human fibroblasts, in its low affinity for LDL and its
relative resistance to downregulation by extracellular
cholesterol.12 29 C57Bl/6 macrophages
appeared to be much more efficient in ß-VLDL association and
degradation than were LDLr(-/-) macrophages
(Bmax 3730 versus 797 ng/mg for association
[Figure 6A
] and
Bmax 2163 versus 202 ng/mg for degradation
[Figure 6B
]). CE accumulation after 24 hours of incubation
with 50 µg/mL ß-VLDL was decreased from 69.1±4.17 µg CE per
milligram cell protein in wild-type macrophages to 40.6±2.97
µg CE per milligram cell protein in LDLr(-/-) macrophages.
No significant difference in cellular CEs could be observed without the
addition of lipoproteins [2.2±1.9 µg CE per milligram cell protein
for wild-type macrophages compared with 1.6±0 µg CE per
milligram cell protein for LDLr(-/-) macrophages] or after
24 hours of incubation with 100 µg/mL acetylated LDL
[22.2±3.7 µg CE per milligram protein for wild-type
macrophages compared with 23.2±6.1 µg CE per milligram
protein for LDLr(-/-) macrophages]. The observed large
difference in ß-VLDL metabolism and ß-VLDLinduced CE
accumulation between C57Bl/6 and LDLr(-/-) macrophages thus
suggests that the so-called unusual LDLr originates from the same gene
as the classic LDLr. Furthermore, the significant role of the LDLr in
the interaction of the atherogenic ß-VLDL with macrophages
may explain its facilitating role in atherogenic lesion formation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using antiserum directed against the LDLr, we showed that most of the
foam cells in the atherosclerotic lesions of LDLr(-/-)
C57Bl/6 mice
were unable to express the LDLr, which is in contrast to the situation
in control transplanted mice. Therefore, it is concluded that the
decreased susceptibility of C57Bl/6 mice reconstituted with LDLr(-/-)
bone marrow to diet-induced atherosclerosis is due to
the inability of arterial macrophages to express
the LDLr. Thus, although the role of the macrophage LDLr in
atherosclerotic lesion development has been thought to be limited
because it is subject to downregulation by intracellular
cholesterol,9 30 31 32 we now clearly
demonstrate that in vivo the macrophage LDLr does play a role
in diet-induced atherosclerotic lesion development in C57Bl/6 mice. The
effect of the macrophage LDLr on diet-induced
atherosclerosis can be considered a direct effect: the
LDLr contributes to the progression of lesion development in the
arterial wall without affecting serum
cholesterol levels. We previously demonstrated that
transplantation of C57Bl/6 bone marrow into LDLr(-/-) mice, which had
serum cholesterol levels 9-fold higher than those of the
mice in the present study even without cholate added to the diet,
did not result in an increase of the atherosclerotic lesion
area.13 Although different animal models were used to
analyze diet-induced (with and without the addition of cholate)
atherosclerosis in these studies, which could make
direct comparisons difficult, the present data strongly suggest
that the LDLr can facilitate foam cell formation only under conditions
of moderate cholesterol levels. Analysis of LDLr
expression in more advanced foam cellrich lesions of control
transplanted C57Bl/6
C57Bl/6 mice revealed that in these mice, the
macrophage LDLr is downregulated during the progression of
lesion development. Therefore, we would like to suggest that the
macrophage LDLr is involved in the initial development of foam
cellrich atherosclerotic lesions.
To induce atherosclerosis, the transplanted mice were
fed an atherogenic diet containing 1% cholesterol and
0.5% cholic acid. As a result, cholesterol in VLDL and
IDL/LDL increased
10-fold. It has previously been shown that
although murine macrophages take up relatively little
unmodified LDL, they take up ß-VLDL and chylomicron remnants via the
LDLr.12 29 The uptake of ß-VLDL results in CE
accumulation in macrophages, which is the first step in
atherosclerosis.31 The LDLr on mouse
peritoneal macrophages was identified as being different from
the classic LDLr, described in human fibroblasts, because of its low
affinity for LDL and its relative resistance to downregulation by
extracellular cholesterol.12 29 In human
monocytederived macrophages, however, Koo et
al11 demonstrated that ß-VLDL uptake is mediated by the
classic LDLr, as described for human fibroblasts. The availability of
wild-type and LDLr(-/-) mice makes it possible to further identify
the unusual LDLr on mouse peritoneal macrophages. In the
present study, the association and degradation of
125I-ß-VLDL appeared to be much higher in
C57Bl/6 than in LDLr(-/-) peritoneal macrophages, indicating
that the unusual LDLr originates from the same LDLr gene as the classic
LDLr. The different properties of the unusual LDLr compared with the
classic LDLr may be related to the fact that macrophages are
metabolically different from fibroblasts. Alternatively,
the murine LDLr may differ from the human LDLr. At present, we can
conclude that LDLr-containing macrophages show a 2.2-fold
increase in cell association and a 4.7-fold increase in degradation of
ß-VLDL, suggesting a significant role for the LDLr in ß-VLDL
catabolism by the macrophages. The decreased ß-VLDL
catabolism by LDLr(-/-) macrophages also resulted in a
decreased CE accumulation by these macrophages. No difference
in accumulation of CEs from acetylated LDL was observed between
wild-type and LDLr(-/-) macrophages, indicating that the
reduced susceptibility to lesion formation on reconstitution of C57Bl/6
mice with LDLr(-/-) bone marrow cannot be attributed to differences
in scavenger receptor expression by LDLr(-/-) macrophages.
Thus, only the decreased ß-VLDL catabolism and CE accumulation in the
absence of the macrophage LDLr may explain the facilitating
role of the LDLr in atherogenic lesion formation.
During the revision period of the present article, a study by Linton et al33 was published that also evaluated the effect of BMT of LDLr-negative bone marrow into C57Bl/6 mice, confirming the role of the LDLr in facilitating atherosclerotic lesion formation. The reported effect of the LDLr on atherosclerosis between both studies is highly comparable: 65% reduction in lesion formation in the absence of the macrophage LDLr in the present study compared with 63% smaller lesions in the study of Linton et al. However, in contrast to our present findings, Linton et al observed a significant (40%) increase in serum cholesterol levels in C57Bl/6 mice transplanted with LDLr-/- bone marrow after consuming a high cholesterol diet for 13 weeks, whereas at 6 weeks, no difference was noticed. The reason for the increase in serum cholesterol levels in mice reconstituted with LDLr(-/-) bone marrow, as observed by Linton et al, between 6 weeks and 13 weeks on a high cholesterol diet is unknown. Previously, we reported that the reconstitution of LDLr(-/-) mice with wild-type bone marrow resulted in only a small and transient reduction in serum cholesterol levels. In comparable studies performed by Boisvert et al,15 a minimal decrease in serum cholesterol levels was also observed, whereas Fazio et al14 did not observe any differences at all. Thus, our present findings confirm the initial conclusions that the leukocyte LDLr does not play an important role in the clearance of lipoproteins from the circulation in mice with intrinsic high cholesterol levels or in mice on a high cholesterol diet.
In conclusion, by transplanting LDLr(-/-) bone marrow into C57Bl/6 mice, we showed that the macrophage LDLr plays a significant role in diet-induced atherosclerosis under conditions of modestly high serum cholesterol. The observation that C57Bl/6 peritoneal macrophages have a much higher association and degradation of 125I-ß-VLDL than do LDLr(-/-) peritoneal macrophages provides a possible mechanism for the contribution of the LDLr to lesion development in the arterial wall.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 21, 1998; accepted March 21, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Lipoprotein receptors in the liver: control signals for plasma cholesterol traffic. J Clin Invest. 1983;72:743747.
3. Hobbs HH, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Molecular genetics of the LDL receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat. 1992;1:445466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Familial hypercholesterolemia. In: Stanbury JB, Wyngaarden JB, Frederickson DS, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Diseases. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1983:622730.
5. Ishibashi S, Brown MS, Goldstein JL, Gerard RD, Hammer RE, Herz J. Hypercholesterolemia in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice and its reversal by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:883893.
6. Ishibashi S, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Herz J, Burns DK. Massive xanthomatosis and atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed low density lipoprotein receptor-negative mice. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:18851893.
7. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Steinberg D. Modified forms of low-density lipoprotein and atherosclerosis. J Intern Med. 1993;233:227232.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Regulation of the activity of low density lipoprotein receptor in human fibroblasts. Cell. 1975;6:307316.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Jaakkola O, Ylä-Herttuala S, Sarkioja T, Nikkari T. Macrophage foam cells from human aortic fatty streaks take up beta-VLDL and acetylated LDL in primary culture. Atherosclerosis. 1989;79:173182.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Koo C, Wernette-Hammond ME, Garcia Z, Malloy MJ, Uauy R, East C, Bilheimer DW, Mahley RW. The uptake of cholesterol-rich remnant lipoproteins by human monocyte-derived macrophages is mediated by low density lipoprotein receptors. J Clin Invest. 1988;81:13321340.
12.
Ellsworth JL, Kraemer FB, Cooper AD. Transport
of ß-very low density lipoproteins and chylomicron remnants by
macrophages is mediated by the low density lipoprotein receptor
pathway. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:23162325.
13.
Herijgers N, Van Eck M, Groot, PHE, Hoogerbrugge PM,
Van Berkel TJC. Effect of bone marrow transplantation on lipoprotein
metabolism and atherosclerosis in LDL
receptorknockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:19952003.
14. Fazio S, Hasty AH, Carter KJ, Murray AB, Price JO, Linton MF. Leukocyte low density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) does not contribute to LDL clearance in vivo: bone marrow transplantation studies in the mouse. J Lipid Res. 1997;38:391400.[Abstract]
15.
Boisvert WA, Spangenberg J, Curtiss LK. Role of
leukocyte-specific LDL receptors on plasma lipoprotein
cholesterol and atherosclerosis in mice.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:340347.
16. Nishina PM, Verstuyft J, Paigen B. Effects of dietary fats from animal and plant sources on diet-induced fatty streak lesions in C57BL/6J mice. J Lipid Res. 1992;31:859869.[Abstract]
17.
Groot PHE, van Vlijmen BJM, Benson GM, Hofker M,
Schiffelers R, Vidgeon-Hart M, Havekes LM. Quantitative assessment of
aortic atherosclerosis in apoE3 Leiden transgenic mice
and its relationship to serum cholesterol exposure.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:926933.
18. Redgrave TG, Roberts DCK, Wert CE. Separation of plasma lipoproteins by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Anal Biochem. 1975;65:4249.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. McFarlane AS. Efficient trace-labelling of proteins with iodine. Nature. 1958;182:53.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. van Tol A, van Gent T, van het Hooft FM, Vlaspolder F. High density lipoprotein catabolism before and after partial hepatectomy. Atherosclerosis. 1978;29:439448.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Basu SK, Goldstein JL, Anderson GW, Brown MS. Degradation of cationized low density lipoprotein and regulation of cholesterol metabolism in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;72:31783182.
22.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Fair AL, Randall RJ. Protein
measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265275.
23.
Henriksen T, Mahoney EM, Steinberg D. Enhanced
macrophage degradation of low density lipoprotein previously
incubated with cultured endothelial cells: recognition
by receptors for acetylated low-density lipoprotein. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:64996503.
24. Havekes LM, de Wit ECM, Princen HMG. Cellular free cholesterol in HepG2 cells is only partially available for down-regulation of the low density lipoprotein receptor. Biochem J. 1987;247:739746.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Breslow JL. Mouse models in atherosclerosis. Science. 1996;272:685688.[Abstract]
26. Purcell-Huynh DA, Farese RV Jr, Johnson DF, Flynn LM, Pierotti V, Newland DL, Linton MF, Sanan DA, Young SG. Transgenic mice expressing high levels of human apolipoprotein B develop severe atherosclerotic lesions in response to a high-fat diet. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:22462257.
27. Cohen RD, Castellani, LW, Qiao JH, Van Lenten BJ, Lusis AJ, Reue K. Reduced aortic lesions and elevated high density lipoprotein levels in transgenic mice overexpressing mouse apolipoprotein A-IV. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:19061916.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Arai T, Wang N, Bezouevski M, Welch C, Tall AR.
Decreased atherosclerosis in heterozygous low density
lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice expressing scavenger receptor BI
transgene. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:23662371.
29.
Koo C, Wernette-Hammond ME, Innerarity TL. Uptake of
canine ß-very low density lipoproteins by mouse peritoneal
macrophages is mediated by a low density lipoprotein receptor.
J Biol Chem. 1986;261:1119411201.
30.
Soutar AK, Knight BL. Structure and regulation of the
LDL-receptor and its gene. Br Med Bull. 1990;46:891916.
31. Srivastava RAK, Jiao S, Tang J, Pfleger BA, Kitchens RT, Schonfeld G. In vivo regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor and apolipoprotein B gene expressions by dietary fat and cholesterol in inbred strains of mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1086:2943.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Goldstein JL, Ho YK, Brown MS, Innerarity TL, Mahley
RW. Cholesteryl ester accumulation in macrophages resulting
from receptor-mediated uptake and degradation of
hypercholesterolemic canine ß-very low density
lipoproteins. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:18391848.
33.
Linton MF, Babaev VR, Gleaves LA, Fazio S. A direct
role for the macrophage low density lipoprotein receptor in
atherosclerotic lesion formation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:1920419210.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Altenburg, L. Johnson, J. Wilder, and N. Maeda Apolipoprotein E4 in Macrophages Enhances Atherogenesis in a Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-dependent Manner J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2007; 282(11): 7817 - 7824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Cassis, D. L. Rateri, H. Lu, and A. Daugherty Bone Marrow Transplantation Reveals That Recipient AT1a Receptors Are Required to Initiate Angiotensin II-Induced Atherosclerosis and Aneurysms Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2007; 27(2): 380 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Baldan, L. Pei, R. Lee, P. Tarr, R. K. Tangirala, M. M. Weinstein, J. Frank, A. C. Li, P. Tontonoz, and P. A. Edwards Impaired Development of Atherosclerosis in Hyperlipidemic Ldlr-/- and ApoE-/- Mice Transplanted With Abcg1-/- Bone Marrow Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(10): 2301 - 2307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Daugherty, N. R. Webb, D. L. Rateri, and V. L. King Thematic review series: The Immune System and Atherogenesis. Cytokine regulation of macrophage functions in atherogenesis J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1812 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. van der Veen, J. K. Kruit, R. Havinga, J. F. W. Baller, G. Chimini, S. Lestavel, B. Staels, P. H. E. Groot, A. K. Groen, and F. Kuipers Reduced cholesterol absorption upon PPAR{delta} activation coincides with decreased intestinal expression of NPC1L1 J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 526 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Patel, J. Morrow, F. R. Maxfield, D. K. Strickland, S. Greenberg, and I. Tabas The Cytoplasmic Domain of the Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Receptor-related Protein, but Not That of the LDL Receptor, Triggers Phagocytosis J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2003; 278(45): 44799 - 44807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Argmann, C. H. Van Den Diepstraten, C. G. Sawyez, J. Y. Edwards, R. A. Hegele, B. M. Wolfe, and M. W. Huff Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Inhibits Macrophage Cholesteryl Ester Accumulation Induced by Native and Oxidized VLDL Remnants Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2001; 21(12): 2011 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |