Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2000;20:1753-1762

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, H.-I
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, H.-I
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, C.-H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell biology/structural biology
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2000;20:1753.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Vascular Biology

Multiple Connexin Expression in Regenerating Arterial Endothelial Gap Junctions

Hung-I Yeh; Yu-Jun Lai; Hao-Min Chang; Yu-Shien Ko; Nicholas J. Severs; Cheng-Ho Tsai

From Mackay Memorial Hospital (H.-I.Y., Y.-J.L., H.-M.C., C.-H.T.), Taipei Medical College, and the First Cardiovascular Division (Y.-S.K.), Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and the National Heart and Lung Institute (Y.-S.K., N.J.S.), Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK.

Correspondence to Cheng-Ho Tsai, Cardiac Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 92, Sec 2, North Chung San Road, Taipei 10449, Taiwan. E-mail cht7678{at}ms2.mmh.org.tw


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Endothelial cells form gap junctions that, according to vessel type, may be composed of up to 3 types of connexin, connexin37, connexin40, and connexin43. Although changes in connexin expression have been linked to growth and injury in cultured endothelial cells, information on connexin expression in regenerating endothelium in situ is lacking. We investigated gap junction distribution and expression of all 3 endothelial connexins during healing in rat carotid artery after denudation injury. En face viewing of the vascular luminal surface by means of immunoconfocal microscopy was used to examine the spatial and temporal expression pattern of the endothelial connexins. Gap junction spots labeled by specific antisera against connexin37, connexin40, and connexin43 were quantified 7, 14, and 28 days after injury, and the relations among the connexins were examined by using colocalization analysis. Complementary electron microscopy was also conducted. After injury, the regenerating endothelium initially expressed small, sparse gap junctions, the numbers of which progressively increased to values equivalent to those of controls. Although connexin40 gap-junctional spot size and area returned to uninjured levels by 28 days after injury, connexin37 and connexin43 spot size and area exceeded those of the uninjured artery (P<0.05). Double-label analysis showed that even though colocalization of connexins to the same gap-junctional spot is a common feature, the extent of colocalization was time dependent (>80% in the intact artery at postinjury day 28 and <70% at postinjury days 7 and 14, P<0.01). We conclude that distinct alterations in expression of the 3 connexins are associated with regeneration of the arterial endothelium in situ, implying different intercellular communication requirements during the various phases of the healing process.


Key Words: gap junctions • connexin • endothelial cells • regeneration


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Vascular endothelial cells interconnect to form a single layer covering the luminal surface of the blood vessel. This anatomic location makes the endothelium a primary target for injury by blood-borne atherogenic factors, such as those associated with hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking.1 2 In the clinical course of atherosclerosis, damage to the endothelium may arise not only from the disease itself but also from angioplasty.3 Depending on the severity of injury, endothelial cells manifest dysfunction or desquamation followed by regeneration, the ability of which is critical to inhibition of proatherogenic processes, such as phenotypic transformation of the underlying smooth muscle cells.4 5 Regulation of endothelial cell regeneration is thought to involve a range of cell-cell signaling processes, including those mediated by gap junctions.6 7

Gap junctions are clusters of protein channels that link the cytoplasmic compartments of neighboring cells, allowing direct exchange of signaling molecules (<1000 Da) and ions.8 9 The component proteins of these channels, connexins, belong to a multigene family. Of the 16 members identified in mammalian cells, connexin37 (Cx37), Cx40, and Cx43 are known to be expressed in various levels in different types of endothelial cells.10 11 12 13 14 Studies in in vitro expression systems indicate that the properties of gap-junctional channels are determined by their connexin makeup and that the function of channels made of 2 connexins differs from that of channels made of either 1.15 16 17 Thus, endothelial cell gap junctions, containing up to 3 connexins, possess considerable potential for modulation of specific intercellular communication properties according to functional need.

Gap junctions are implicated in a variety of endothelial activities, notably maintenance of monolayer topology, coordination of vasomotor responses, and regulation of angiogenesis, endothelial growth, and senescence.6 18 19 20 21 The specific pattern of connexin expression may also be differentially affected by physical and chemical factors, such as mechanical load, blood sugar level, growth factors, and cytokines.21 22 23 24 25 However, current knowledge about the role of each connexin in the endothelial cell is limited, and most studies have been limited to examination of 1 or 2 connexins. Previous studies of regenerating vascular endothelium in animal models have been confined to morphometric measurement of the size and number of gap junctions, and corresponding in vitro studies have been confined to Cx43.19 22 26

Our previous work suggested that gap junctions are upregulated on phenotypic transformation of vascular smooth muscle cells after injury.27 28 However, the role of individual connexins and their interrelationship in the overlying endothelium in this process is not known. Therefore, we investigated the spatial and temporal expression patterns of endothelial gap junctions and connexins during vascular healing in rat carotid artery after denudation injury. Our previous work with this model showed that Cx37 and Cx40 are present only in the endothelial cells, whereas Cx43 is expressed in both the endothelium and underlying smooth muscle.28


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Samples and Tissue Processing
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (300 to 400 g) were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg IP), and the left common carotid artery was denuded of endothelium by means of cephalic-to-caudal passage of polyethylene (PE50) tubing (Clay Adams), which was done 3 times. At least 3 cm of the tubing was introduced into the artery to ensure that the tip reached the aorta–carotid artery junction. After the tubing was removed, the artery puncture site was sealed with tissue adhesive (Vetbond, 3M Co). The uninjured right carotid artery served as a control.

Immediately after the operation, 4 animals were injected with 1 mg/kg of Evans blue dye (Sigma) in PBS through the femoral vein and were perfusion fixed for assessment of the extent of injury. Twenty-one animals were killed (without administration of Evans blue) 7, 14, and 28 days after injury (7 animals per group) for immunoconfocal study of connexins. These animals were anesthetized (with pentobarbital administered intraperitoneally) and perfused retrogradely, by means of a catheter placed in the abdominal aorta, with heparinized PBS (10 U/mL) followed by phosphate-buffered 2% paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) for 10 minutes. The proximal portions of the carotid arteries and the connecting aortic arch were dissected and stored under liquid nitrogen before immunolabeling. Selected arterial samples were prepared for thin-section electron microscopy by using standard procedures.28 The work was conducted in accordance with the Republic of China Animal Protection Law (Scientific Application of Animals) of 1998.

Immunofluorescence Labeling of Connexins and Endothelial Cell Identification
Anti-Connexin Antibodies and Endothelial Cell Marker
Three principal antibodies were used for immunofluorescent detection of Cx37, Cx40, and Cx43. The Cx37 polyclonal antiserum, designated Y16Y(R3), was raised in rabbits against a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 266 to 281 of the cytoplasmic C-terminal tail of rat Cx37.The Cx40 polyclonal antiserum, designated V15K(GP319), was produced in guinea pigs against a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 256 to 270 of the cytoplasmic C-terminal tail of rat Cx40. These two antisera were affinity purified against the appropriate peptide coupled to an activated chromatography matrix. The connexin isotype specificity of each purified antibody was confirmed by immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis of cells transfected to express different connexins. This approach demonstrates that neither antibody cross-reacts with other connexins.13 More comprehensive characterization was performed by using immunogold labeling and electron microscopy.13 For Cx43, a mouse monoclonal antibody of widely established reliability was purchased from Chemicon. Endothelial cells were identified using rabbit anti-human von Willebrand factor polyclonal antiserum (Dako).

Secondary Antibody and Detection Systems
Donkey anti-rabbit, anti–guinea pig, and anti-mouse immunoglobulin conjugated to CY3 or CY5 (Chemicon) were used to visualize immunolabeled connexins. For single labeling of individual connexins, CY3-conjugated antibodies were used. For double labeling of 2 connexins, 1 CY3-conjugated antibody and 1 CY5-conjugated were used in combination. In selected experiments in which Cx43 was visualized with CY3, simultaneous endothelial cell marking was performed using anti–von Willebrand factor detected with donkey anti-rabbit-CY5.

Immunolabeling of Connexins
For single labeling of 1 connexin, samples were cut into rings, blocked in 0.5% BSA (15 minutes), and incubated with anti-Cx37 (1:60), anti-Cx40 (1:100), or anti-Cx43 (1:500) at 37°C for 2 hours.13 Samples were then treated with CY3-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500, room temperature, 1 hour). In experiments in which 2 connexins were simultaneously localized in the same samples, the samples were incubated in a mixture of anti-Cx37 plus anti-Cx40, anti-Cx37 plus anti-Cx43, or anti-Cx40 plus anti-Cx43, followed by a mixture of the 2 corresponding species-specific secondary antibodies (CY3 and CY5; 1:500). When simultaneous marking of endothelial cells was performed, single-labeled samples were incubated with anti–von Willebrand factor (1:500). Finally, arterial rings were cut open and mounted for en face viewing of endothelial cells. All experiments included sections of rat heart as positive controls11 ; primary antibody was omitted in negative controls. Each secondary reagent was confirmed to be species specific by secondary antibody crossover (eg, mouse primary antibody followed by anti-rabbit or anti–guinea pig secondary antibody).

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and Image Analysis
Immunostained samples were examined by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy using a Leica TCS SP equipped with an argon/krypton laser with the appropriate filter spectra adjusted for the detection of CY3 and CY5 fluorescence. Single-connexin–labeled samples were used for semiquantification of gap junctions. After the signal on top of the sample was observed, images were collected using the x40 objective lens and zoom 1.0 computer setting so that each pixel represented 0.24 µm. Each recorded image consisted of 1024x1024 pixels, and projection views of consecutive optical sections taken at 0.4-µm intervals through the full thickness of endothelial connexin signal were recorded for analysis. Mean thickness of the vascular wall investigated was 6 µm. For double labeling, images were taken using simultaneous dual-channel scanning. Connexin labeling from the images was analyzed by using procedures similar to those described and validated previously.27 28 29

Images of single-connexin–labeled samples were analyzed by using QWIN image analysis software (Leica). For each animal, 1 injured plus 1 uninjured arterial ring was used. From each arterial ring, 4 randomly selected fields were analyzed. Software setting were kept constant in all animals. Mean values (±SDs) of (1) the area of individual immunolabeled gap junctions, (2) the number of immunolabeled gap junctions per 100 µm2 of luminal surface area, and (3) the total area of immunolabeled gap junction, expressed as the percentage of luminal surface area, were obtained for each experimental group.

The extent of connexin colocalization in the endothelia in each experimental group was also analyzed using double-connexin–labeled arterial rings. Projections of images were collected and split into 2 separate ("split") images corresponding to each connexin. Fifty immunolabeled spots were randomly selected from each double-label image, and the component connexins of each spot were determined by analyzing the split images. When a spot visible on the double-label image had a corresponding spot on each of the 2 split images (ie, both connexins were present), the sample was classified as showing colocalization. If a spot appeared on only 1 split image and not on the other, the sample was classified as containing 1 or the other individual connexin. For each experimental group, 2 images from each animal (ie, 100 gap junction spots) were analyzed. Results were expressed as the mean percentage (±SD) of gap junction spots showing fluorescence for each individual connexin that also showed fluorescence for the second connexin in each double-label combination.

Statistical Analysis
Data were compared statistically by means of ANOVA and Student’s t test.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In animals injected with Evans blue dye after passage of PE50 tubing, the left carotid artery was homogeneously stained in blue, indicating damage to the endothelial layer. Blue staining ceased at the junction with the aortic arch. In contrast, the right carotid arteries (controls) were free of staining, and all 3 connexins were present in the endothelium. After injury, the pattern of expression of the 3 connexins was markedly altered; the sequence of changes observed for each connexin is illustrated in Figure 1Down. Corresponding data are summarized in Figure 2Down, and results of double labeling and connexin colocalization are shown in Figures 3Down and 4Down.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Confocal images illustrating the chronological changes in pattern of expression of Cx37, Cx40, and Cx43 in rat carotid arterial endothelium after denudation injury, as revealed by en face viewing after single labeling. Typical images for each connexin at the time points examined are shown. E, Image from the area in conjunction with the aorta. F, Spindle-shaped cells with abundant Cx43 signal are smooth muscle cells, visible after endothelial denudation. In all preparations, patches of several cells with diminished signal were noted. All images, oriented parallel to the long axis of the artery with the cephalic side up, are at the same magnification. Bar=25 µm. Ctrl indicates control.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Immunoconfocal analysis of gap junction spots detected by antibodies against Cx37, Cx40, and Cx43. Top, Number of gap junction spots per unit area of the luminal surface. Middle, Mean size of gap junction spots. Bottom, Total gap-junctional area per unit area of luminal surface. Control values were pooled from data obtained from time-matched controls after verifying that there were no significant differences between controls for the individual time points. The number and size of gap junction spots in regenerating endothelium, as detected with each antibody, were initially reduced compared with controls and then progressively increased. By postinjury day 28, Cx43 and Cx37 spots exceeded those of controls in both size and total area of endothelial surface occupied. Cx40 spots, however, did not grow in size after day 14, so the total gap junction area at day 28 was not significantly different from that of controls. *P<0.01 for comparison between the time point marked and each of the others of the same connexin, +P<0.05, ++P<0.01.



View larger version (224K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. En face confocal view of endothelium double labeled for Cx37 (red) and Cx40 (green) at different time points. In uninjured artery (A), most of the spots look yellowish because of the superimposition of red and green fluorescence of different intensities; however, spots of pure red or green color are visible (arrows). B, Image obtained from the junctional area between the carotid artery and aorta at day 7. Isolated spots at the newly developed regenerating endothelium, outside the clustered abundant labels in the aortic region, are tiny and rare. These spots often contained elements of red and green (arrowheads). At days 14 and 28 (C and D, respectively), the outline of individual endothelial cells in the regenerated area becomes clear as a result of the growing number and size of gap junction spots, most of which are a mixture of red and green. All images, at the same magnification, are oriented as described in the legend of Figure 1Up. Bar=25 µm. Ctrl indicates control.



View larger version (208K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. En face confocal view of endothelium double labeled for 2 connexins. A and B, Cx37 (red) with Cx43 (green). Colocalization of the 2 connexins predominates in the uninjured artery (A). At postinjury day 7 (B), in addition to the punctate label, Cx43 is prominent in the perinuclear region of spindle-shaped smooth muscle cells exposed below endothelium. B, Image from the junctional area between the carotid artery and aorta. C and D, Cx40 (red) with Cx43 (green). As with Cx37 with Cx40 and Cx37 with Cx43 double labeling, extensive colocalization of Cx40 with Cx43 occurs in the uninjured artery (C). At postinjury day 14 (D), colocalization of the 2 connexins is apparent for many of the spots. All images, at the same magnification, are oriented as described in the legend of Figure 1Up. Bar=25 µm. Ctrl indicates control.

Gap Junction Distribution and Connexin Expression in Normal (Noninjured) Arterial Endothelium
En face views of the luminal surface after single labeling clearly displayed the endothelial pavement, with punctate connexin signal, typical of gap junctions, delineating the borders of endothelial cells (Figures 1AUp through 1C). Overall, the 3 connexins shared a similar expression pattern, including (1) the number of gap-junctional spots per unit area (Figure 2Up, top), (2) spot size (Figure 2Up, middle), and (3) percentage area of connexin signal (Figure 2Up, bottom).

Double labeling enabled examination of the spatial relationship between pairs of different connexins. Colocalization of 2 connexins within the same spot was indicated by yellow fluorescence, which was due to direct superimposition of red and green fluorescence. For each of the 3 combinations, Cx37 with Cx40 (Figure 3AUp), Cx37 with Cx43 (Figure 4AUp), and Cx40 with Cx43 (Figure 4CUp), >80% of the spots expressing 1 connexin also expressed the other (the TableDown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Analysis of Connexin Colocalization in Double-Label Experiments

Gap Junction Distribution and Connexin Expression After Injury
Changes in gap junction distribution and connexin expression observed after injury involved all 3 connexins (Figures 1Up and 2Up). Immediately after injury, as the endothelium was denuded, fluorescence signal at the luminal surface attributable to endothelial gap junctions was absent. Endothelial marking and electron microscopy demonstrated reappearance of endothelial cells from 7 days onward (Figures 5Down and 6Down). Sequential confocal observation revealed that each of the 3 connexins had distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns (Figures 1DUp through 1L). For each connexin, the change was statistically significant between different time points (P<0.01).



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. En face confocal view of the endothelium double labeled for endothelial cell marker von Willebrand factor (red) and Cx43 (green) at different time points. In the uninjured artery (A), Cx43 spots outline the cell borders and signal for von Willebrand factor is more or less homogeneously distributed among the cells. In contrast, at the luminal side 7 days after injury, von Willebrand factor signal is distributed heterogeneously, indicating the presence of randomly oriented endothelial cells with spaces between them. Overall, areas expressing von Willebrand factor account for >70% of the field examined (B). In addition to the endothelial marking, the group of cells with perinuclear Cx43 are subendothelial smooth muscle cells. All images, at the same magnification, are oriented as described in the legend of Figure 1Up. Bar=25 µm. Ctrl indicates control.



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Thin-section electron micrographs demonstrating typical morphological characteristics of endothelial cells and their gap junctions at different time points. A, Endothelium of uninjured artery. Two gap junctions are shown (arrows), reflecting their abundance in the artery. Note that the 2 neighboring cells interdigitate with each other to form the intercellular border. Inset, High-magnification view of a large gap junction with its characteristic pentilaminar structure from near this field. B, Image taken immediately after injury shows damage caused by passage of PE50 tubing. Endothelial cells are desquamated or broken into pieces, some of which remain loosely attached to the underlying internal elastic lamina. C and D, Images taken 7 days after injury. C, Two slender cellular processes meet each other and form a small gap junction (arrow). Inset, High-magnification view of this gap junction. D, One slender cellular process protrudes from the right to connect the body of another cell by the formation of adherens junction (arrow). E, Image taken 14 days after injury showing one gap junction (arrow). Inset, high-magnification view. F, Large gap junctions are frequently seen 28 days after injury. Bottom, Two gap junctions (arrows). Top, Single large gap junction at high magnification. All images except the insets and the top image of F are at the same magnification; all insets and the top image of F are at the same magnification. Bars=0.5 µm.

Single-Connexin Labeling
For Cx37, immunolabeled spots were sparsely scattered throughout the regenerating endothelium 7 days after injury (Figure 1DUp) compared with the abundant expression in the intact artery (Figure 1AUp). In addition, spot size and total gap-junctional area were smaller (day 7 versus control, P<0.01; Figure 2Up). This pattern abruptly changed at the junctional zone with the aortic arch, where clusters of endothelial cells abundantly labeled with Cx37, as seen in the uninjured artery, were found. Fourteen days after injury, Cx37 spots were unevenly distributed (Figure 1GUp), and spot number, size, and area were increased significantly (P<0.01). By day 28 (Figure 1JUp), Cx37 spot number had returned to and Cx37 spot size and area exceeded levels of the uninjured artery (day 28 versus control, P<0.01 for Cx37 spot size and P<0.05 for Cx37 area). Cx40 followed a similar expression pattern after injury. Figure 1EUp, taken from the junctional zone of the artery with the aorta 7 days after injury, shows clusters of Cx40-rich cells from the uninjured area with only few spots in the bordering injured zone. During recovery, the number of Cx40 spots and total gap-junctional area in the injured artery progressively increased (Figures 1HUp, 1KUp, and 2Up, P<0.01). However, although the average size of Cx40 spots increased initially (days 7 versus 14, P<0.01), unlike Cx37, no additional increase occurred after 14 days.

The temporal pattern of Cx43 expression differed from that of the other connexins but in a cell type–related manner. Seven days after injury, spindle-shaped cells expressing Cx43 were unevenly distributed on the luminal side of the injured artery, below the level of the endothelium (Figure 1FUp). In addition to the punctate label along the cell border, Cx43 signal was apparent in the cytoplasm, especially concentrated at the perinuclear region. Judging from their morphological characteristics, location, and relationship with the endothelial cells, as demonstrated by double labeling for Cx43 and von Willebrand factor (Figure 5Up), these spindle-shaped cells were identified as subendothelial smooth muscle cells. Only sparse Cx43 spots were seen outside these spindle-shaped cells, which abruptly disappeared after day 7 (Figures 1IUp and 1LUp). Because Cx43 signal from cellular processes of smooth muscle cells was difficult to distinguish from those of endothelial cells, no analysis was performed at this time point. After day 7, expression of Cx43 in the regenerating endothelium increased in a temporal pattern similar to that of Cx37 (Figures 1IUp, 1LUp, and 2Up).

Double-Connexin Labeling
Double labeling of the injured artery at all stages demonstrated that the presence of >1 connexin in the gap-junctional spots was a common feature in regenerating endothelium. Figures 3BUp through 3D contain typical images from injured artery double labeled for Cx37 and Cx40. Seven days after injury, >60% of the sparsely observed spots expressed both connexins. In general, spots expressing 1 connexin and not the other were smaller than those expressing both. In the connexin-rich endothelial cells at the junction between the injured carotid artery and uninjured aortic arch, extensive colocalization was apparent (Figure 3BUp). As the regenerating endothelium progressively developed gap junctions 14 and 28 days after injury (Figures 3CUp and 3DUp), the extent of colocalization increased to >80% (the TableUp).

A similar extent of colocalization was found with combinations of Cx43 plus Cx37 and Cx43 plus Cx40 (Figure 4Up). Seven days after injury, the junctional zone between the injured carotid artery and aortic arch contained abundant Cx43-expressing smooth muscle cells on the carotid side (Figure 4BUp). As in the corresponding single-labeling experiments, endothelial Cx37 and Cx40 labeling was sparse; however, the majority of Cx37 and Cx40 spots also expressed Cx43. As the Cx43-expressing smooth muscle cells became concealed by the regenerating endothelium, the images of Cx37 with Cx43 and of Cx40 with Cx43 developed in a pattern similar to that of Cx37 with Cx40 (Figure 4DUp).

Electron Microscopic Examination
In the intact carotid artery endothelium, gap junctions were frequently seen at cell borders (Figure 6AUp). Immediately after injury, the endothelium was so severely damaged that no intact cells remained on the internal elastic lamina (Figure 6BUp). From this stage, the endothelium gradually recovered. Seven days after injury, endothelial cells covered substantial areas (but not all) of the previously damaged luminal surface. At this stage, junctional borders between adjacent endothelial cells were limited in size and had occasional tiny gap junctions (Figures 6CUp and 6DUp). These findings thus excluded the possibility that at 7 days after injury the reduction of endothelial connexin expression, as observed in the immunolabeling experiments, was due to the absence of endothelial cells. Fourteen days after injury, gap junctions were more numerous and larger (Figure 6EUp). This trend continued, and by day 28 large, abundant gap junctions were observed (Figure 6FUp).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study demonstrated that after regeneration of injured endothelium, gap junction number initially declines but subsequently recovers to the level found in the uninjured artery, that this process involves all 3 connexins (Cx37, Cx40, and Cx43), and that colocalization of different connexins to the same gap junction is a common feature beginning early in the regeneration process. Within this framework, there are distinct differences in the changes in relative expression levels of the 3 connexins. Whereas the amount of Cx40 signal recovers to the same level, the amount of Cx37 and Cx43 signal reaches higher levels than in the uninjured artery as a result of the formation of larger gap-junctional spots containing these connexins. These findings, demonstrated by en face immunoconfocal viewing of the endothelium and complementary electron microscopy, substantially expand current knowledge of gap junction biology in the healing vascular wall.

Note that immunoconfocal microscopy, as applied here, does not provide quantitative data on the absolute amounts of connexin expressed in the endothelial cells but, as established by previous studies,27 28 29 does give a reliable guide to the relative level of a given connexin assembled in the form of gap junctions. The data are thus distinct from those obtained by quantification of Western blots, in which the relative overall amounts of total (cytoplasmic and gap-junctional) connexin over the tissue as a whole are measured. Our finding that gap junctions were tiny and rare initially after injury and progressively grew in size and number during regeneration is consistent with findings of previous studies that used freeze-fracture electron microscopy on mechanically injured rabbit carotid artery and rat aorta.26 30 However, these earlier experiments gave no information about the nature of the connexins present. We showed that all 3 connexins are affected and respond in distinct ways. Connexin expression in mechanically wounded endothelial cells in vitro is reported to differ between microvascular (bovine adrenal cortex) and large-vessel endothelial cells (bovine aorta and pulmonary artery); increased Cx43 has been reported in the former19 31 but not the latter.18 19 If the in vitro models faithfully reflect in vivo denudation, then the changes in the carotid artery investigated in this study would be expected to conform to those of large-vessel cells. However, our results showed that Cx43 expression is elevated after 4 weeks in vivo. Apart from mechanical injury, other factors are reported to affect endothelial connexins. For example, increased mechanical load enhances Cx43 expression,23 and treatment with tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, a cytokine promoting endothelial cell migration, leads to upregulation of Cx43 and downregulation of Cx37 and Cx40 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.25 In addition, Cx43 and Cx37 in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells are reported to be differentially regulated by cell density and growth status21 ; although levels of Cx43 mRNA and protein were high in subconfluent cells and low in confluent cells, the opposite applied to Cx37 mRNA, which was present only in low amounts until the cultures became confluent. In contrast, in the present study, Cx37 and Cx43 spots increased progressively during the course of endothelial regeneration in vivo. These comparisons emphasize that expression patterns of connexins in culture systems may not mimic those occurring in vivo and that caution is required in extrapolation of data from in vitro studies to whole vascular tissues.

Apart from in vitro studies, investigation of intact vascular tissues demonstrates that connexin expression is influenced by a variety of factors. For example, the precise levels of expression of the 3 endothelial connexins depends in part on vascular site,11 12 13 14 and the similar signal levels for the 3 connexins in uninjured rat carotid artery endothelium, distinct from the patterns previously reported in aorta, pulmonary artery, and coronary artery of the same animal, are in keeping with this finding. In a recent study examining rat aorta and its branching arteries, high levels of endothelial Cx43 gap junctions were associated with areas facing turbulent flow.32 Our finding that expression of endothelial Cx43 is enhanced 4 weeks after injury is consistent with this result, because the luminal profile of an injured artery favors generation of turbulent flow.

An important finding of the present study is that in regenerating endothelium, gap junctions are commonly composed of >1 connexin, even from the earliest stage when the junctions are small and sparse. Colocalization of connexins has been reported in endothelial cells of microvessels and large vessels.11 33 In addition, our previous work in rat aorta and pulmonary artery demonstrated that individual endothelial gap-junctional plaques contain up to 3 connexins.13 14 The present study showed that over the regrowth of the monolayer, different connexins tend to mix within individual gap junctions. Furthermore, the relative amounts of individual connexins in the gap junctions during this process is time dependent, as indicated by the finding that colocalization occurs more frequently during the later stages. Although the connexin makeup of individual channels cannot be determined by confocal microscopy, the results of semiquantification and colocalization analysis suggest that the distribution of each connexin in individual gap junctions containing >1 connexin is not uniform. Given that most gap junctions contain >1 connexin, if the connexins were homogeneously distributed, then the dimensions of gap junctions obtained from immunolabeling using antibodies against the component connexins at different stages after injury would be expected to show a similar trend. In contrast, we found that although Cx37 and Cx43 spots continued to increase in size, Cx40 spots remained constant after 14 days.

Overexpression of connexins after injury raises the possibility that gap-junctional intercellular communication properties of the injured artery differ from those of the uninjured artery. In vitro studies have established that each connexin endows gap-junctional channels with unique properties.8 15 34 35 36 Although the precise role of each connexin in vivo remains unclear, reports from connexin gene knockout studies give some useful clues. Deletion of Cx43 in the mouse leads to postnatal death because of a cardiac anomaly, deletion of Cx37 leads to female sterility, and deletion of Cx40 leads to abnormal cardiac conduction, but in all cases no obvious morphological defect is observed in the vascular endothelium.37 38 39 40 However, when Cx37 and Cx40 are both deleted from the genome, the animals die perinatally and defective vascular integrity is prominent.41 Thus, although there seems to be some capacity for functional compensation by remaining connexins when 1 member is absent, lack of 2 connexins compromises endothelial function. However, the possibility that lack of a single endothelial connexin predisposes to long-term vascular disease cannot be excluded.

In conclusion, rat carotid arterial endothelium retains the ability to generate the 3 connexin proteins into gap junctions after mechanical injury. The distinct patterns of expression, distribution, and organization of these connexins into gap junctions suggest a capacity to modulate communication properties between neighboring cells during different phases of the healing process. The different responses of the individual connexins indicate that each connexin in the endothelial cell is subjected to specific regulation during this process.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants NSC-89-2314-B-195-006 from the National Science Council of Taiwan and MMH-8702 from the Medical Research Department of Mackay Memorial Hospital. We thank Drs E. Dupont and S. R. Coppen for assistance in the purification of anti-connexin antisera. N.J.S. acknowledges support from the European Commission.

Received October 8, 1999; accepted December 21, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Schwartz SM, DeBlois D, O’Brien ERM. The intima: soil for atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circ Res. 1995;77:445–465.[Free Full Text]
  2. Shimokawa H. Primary endothelial dysfunction: atherosclerosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:23–37.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Schwartz SM, Haudenschild CC, Eddy EM. Endothelial regeneration, I: quantitative analysis of initial stages of endothelial regeneration in rat aortic intima. Lab Invest. 1978;38:568–580.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ross R. Cell biology of atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995;57:791–804.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Vanhoutte PM. Endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(suppl E):E19–E29.
  6. Christ GJ, Spray DC, El-Sabban M, Moore LK, Brink PR. Gap junctions in vascular tissues: evaluating the role of intercellular communication in the modulation of vasomotor tone. Circ Res. 1996;79:631–646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Severs NJ, Dupont E, Kaprielian RR, Yeh H, Rothery S. Gap junctions and connexins in the cardiovascular system. In: Yacoub MH, Carpentier A, Pepper J, Fabiani J-N, eds. Annual of Cardiac Surgery, 1996. 9th ed. London, UK: Rapid Science; 1996:31–44.
  8. Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL. Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem. 1996;238:1–27.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kumar NM, Gilula NB. The gap junction communication channel. Cell. 1996;84:381–388.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. van Rijen HVM, van Kempen MJA, Analbers LJS, Rook MB, van Ginneken ACG, Gros D, Jongsma HJ. Gap junctions in human umbilical cord endothelial cells contain multiple connexins. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:C117–C130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yeh H, Dupont E, Coppen S, Rothery S, Severs NJ. Gap junction localization and connexin expression in cytochemically identified endothelial cells from arterial tissue. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997;45:539–550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hong T, Hill CE. Restricted expression of the gap junctional protein connexin 43 in the arterial system of the rat. J Anat. 1998;192:583–593.
  13. Yeh H, Rothery S, Dupont E, Coppen SR, Severs NJ. Individual gap junction plaques contain multiple connexins in arterial endothelium. Circ Res. 1998;83:1248–1263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ko YS, Yeh HI, Rothery S, Dupont E, Coppen SR, Severs NJ. Connexin make-up of endothelial gap junctions in the rat pulmonary artery as revealed by immunoconfocal microscopy and triple-label immunogold electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem. 1999;47:683–692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Elfgang C, Eckert R, Lichtenberg-Fraté H, Butterweck A, Traub O, Klein RA, Hülser DF, Willecke K. Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells. J Cell Biol. 1995;129:805–817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. White TW, Bruzzone R. Multiple connexin proteins in single intercellular channels: connexin compatibility and functional consequences. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1996;28:339–350.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Cao F, Eckert R, Elfgang C, Nitsche JM, Snyder SA, Hulser DF, Willecke K, Nicholson BJ. A quantitative analysis of connexin-specific permeability differences of gap junctions expressed in HeLa transfectants and Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:31–43.[Abstract]
  18. Larson DM, Haudenschild CC. Junctional transfer in wounded cultures of bovine aortic endothelial cells. Lab Invest. 1988;59:373–379.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Pepper MS, Montesano R, el Aoumari A, Gros D, Orci L, Meda P. Coupling and connexin 43 expression in microvascular and large vessel endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:C1246–C1257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Xie H, Hu VW. Modulation of gap junctions in senescent endothelial cells. Exp Cell Res. 1994;214:172–176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Larson DM, Wrobleski MJ, Sagar GDV, Westphale EM, Beyer EC. Differential regulation of connexin43 and connexin37 in endothelial cells by cell density, growth, and TGF-ß1. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:C405–C415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Pepper MS, Meda P. Basic fibroblast growth factor increases junctional communication and connexin 43 expression in microvascular endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol. 1992;153:196–205.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Cowan DB, Lye SJ, Langille BL. Regulation of vascular connexin43 gene expression by mechanical loads. Circ Res. 1998;82:786–793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kuroki T, Inoguchi T, Umeda F, Ueda F, Nawata H. High glucose induces alteration of gap junction permeability and phosphorylation of connexin-43 in cultured aortic smooth muscle cells. Diabetes. 1998;47:931–936.[Abstract]
  25. van Rijen HV, van Kempen MJ, Postma S, Jongsma HJ. Tumour necrosis factor alpha alters the expression of connexin43, connexin40, and connexin37 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Cytokine. 1998;10:258–264.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Spagnoli LG, Pietra GG, Villaschi S, Johns LW. Morphometric analysis of gap junctions in regenerating arterial endothelium. Lab Invest. 1982;46:139–148.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Blackburn JP, Peters NS, Yeh HI, Rothery S, Green CR, Severs NJ. Upregulation of connexin43 gap junctions during early stages of human coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1219–1228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yeh H, Lupu F, Dupont E, Severs NJ. Upregulation of connexin43 gap junctions between smooth muscle cells after balloon catheter injury in the rat carotid artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:3174–3184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Green CR, Peters NS, Gourdie RG, Rothery S, Severs NJ. Validation of immunohistochemical quantification in confocal scanning laser microscopy: a comprehensive assessment of gap junction size with confocal and ultrastructural techniques. J Histochem Cytochem. 1993;41:1339–1349.[Abstract]
  30. Hüttner I. Aortic endothelial cell during regeneration: remodeling of cell junctions, stress fibers, and stress fiber-membrane attachment domains. Lab Invest. 1985;53:287–302.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Pepper MS, Spray DC, Chanson MC, Montesano R, Orci L, Meda P. Junctional communication is induced in migrating capillary endothelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:3027–3038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gabriels JE, Paul DL. Connexin43 is highly localized to sites of disturbed flow in rat aortic endothelium but connexin37 and connexin40 are more uniformly distributed. Circ Res. 1998;83:636–643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Little TL, Beyer EC, Duling BR. Connexin 43 and connexin 40 gap junctional proteins are present in arteriolar smooth muscle and endothelium in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H729–H739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Little TL, Xia J, Duling BR. Dye tracers define differential endothelial and smooth muscle coupling patterns within the arteriolar wall. Circ Res. 1995;76:498–504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Veenstra RD. Size and selectivity of gap junction channels formed from different connexins. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1996;28:327–337.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Wang HZ, Veenstra RD. Monovalent ion selectivity sequences of the rat connexin43 gap junction channel. J Gen Physiol. 1997;109:491–507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Reaume AG, de Sousa PA, Kulkarni S, Langille BL, Zhu D, Davies TC, Juneja SC, Kidder GM, Rossant J. Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin43. Science. 1995;267:1831–1834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Simon AM, Goodenough DA, Li E, Paul DL. Female infertility in mice lacking connexin37. Nature. 1997;385:525–529.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Kirchhoff S, Nelles E, Hagendorff A, Kruger O, Traub O, Willecke K. Reduced cardiac conduction velocity and predisposition to arrhythmias in connexin40-deficient mice. Curr Biol. 1998;8:299–302.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Simon AM, Goodenough DA, Paul DL. Mice lacking connexin40 have cardiac conduction abnormalities characteristic of atrioventricular block and bundle branch block. Curr Biol. 1998;8:295–298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Goodenough DA, Simon AM, Paul DL. Gap junctional intercellular communication in the mouse ovarian follicle. Novartis Found Symp.. 1999;219:226–235; discussion 235–240.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
C. J.-Y. Hou, C.-H. Tsai, C.-H. Su, Y.-J. Wu, S.-J. Chen, J.-J. Chiu, M.-S. Shiao, and H.-I Yeh
Diabetes Reduces Aortic Endothelial Gap Junctions in ApoE-deficient Mice: Simvastatin Exacerbates the Reduction
J. Histochem. Cytochem., August 1, 2008; 56(8): 745 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H.-H. Wang, C.-I Kung, Y.-Y. Tseng, Y.-C. Lin, C.-H. Chen, C.-H. Tsai, and H.-I Yeh
Activation of endothelial cells to pathological status by down-regulation of connexin43
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2008; 79(3): 509 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
I. C Villar, A. J Hobbs, and A. Ahluwalia
Sex differences in vascular function: implication of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor
J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 197(3): 447 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Y. Liao, C. P. Regan, I. Manabe, G. K. Owens, K. H. Day, D. N. Damon, and B. R. Duling
Smooth Muscle-Targeted Knockout of Connexin43 Enhances Neointimal Formation in Response to Vascular Injury
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2007; 27(5): 1037 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J.-A. Haefliger, P. Nicod, and P. Meda
Contribution of connexins to the function of the vascular wall
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 345 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. L. Sandow, R. Looft-Wilson, B. Doran, T.H. Grayson, S. S. Segal, and C. E. Hill
Expression of homocellular and heterocellular gap junctions in hamster arterioles and feed arteries
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2003; 60(3): 643 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Hirashiki, Y. Yamada, Y. Murase, Y. Suzuki, H. Kataoka, Y. Morimoto, T. Tajika, T. Murohara, and M. Yokota
Association of gene polymorphisms with coronary artery disease in low- or high-risk subjects defined by conventional risk factors
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 15, 2003; 42(8): 1429 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
H.-I Yeh, C.-S. Lu, Y.-J. Wu, C.-C. Chen, R.-C. Hong, Y.-S. Ko, M.-S. Shiao, N. J. Severs, and C.-H. Tsai
Reduced Expression of Endothelial Connexin37 and Connexin40 in Hyperlipidemic Mice: Recovery of Connexin37 After 7-Day Simvastatin Treatment
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(8): 1391 - 1397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. L. Xu, R. A. Santizo, V. L. Baughman, and D. A. Pelligrino
ADP-induced pial arteriolar dilation in ovariectomized rats involves gap junctional communication
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1082 - H1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
G. T. Cottrell, Y. Wu, and J. M. Burt
Cx40 and Cx43 expression ratio influences heteromeric/ heterotypic gap junction channel properties
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): C1469 - C1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
T. Sato, R. Haimovici, R. Kao, A.-F. Li, and S. Roy
Downregulation of Connexin 43 Expression by High Glucose Reduces Gap Junction Activity in Microvascular Endothelial Cells
Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1565 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
B. R. Kwak, F. Mulhaupt, N. Veillard, D. B. Gros, and F. Mach
Altered Pattern of Vascular Connexin Expression in Atherosclerotic Plaques
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2002; 22(2): 225 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Li, S. Brodsky, S. Kumari, V. Valiunas, P. Brink, J.-I. Kaide, A. Nasjletti, and M. S. Goligorsky
Paradoxical overexpression and translocation of connexin43 in homocysteine-treated endothelial cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2124 - H2133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available