Editorials |
From the Center for Experimental Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Correspondence to Dr G.A. FitzGerald, Center for Experimental Therapeutics, 153 Johnson Pavillion, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail garret{at}@spirit.gcrc.upenn.edu
Key Words: Editorials thromboxane atherosclerosis isoprostane oxidant stress
Aspirin has emerged as a remarkably safe, inexpensive, and effective drug for the secondary prevention of the complications of atherosclerotic disease. It acts by inhibiting the enzyme prostaglandin (PG) G/H synthase, actually a bifunctional protein that sequentially catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid to the highly reactive endoperoxide intermediates PGG2 and PGH2 via its cyclooxygenase (COX) and peroxidase functions. This enzyme, colloquially termed COX, has been crystallized1 and the mechanism of action of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) elucidated.2 3 4 The catalytic site is buried deep within the core of the enzyme and is accessed by the substrate via a hydrophobic tunnel. Aspirin irreversibly acetylates a serine residue at position 529 in the human enzyme,5 close to but not at the catalytic site, though still blocking access to it by the arachidonic acid substrate. NSAIDs, by contrast, act reversibly as competitive inhibitors at the catalytic site. Indeed, transient occupancy of that site after dosing with an NSAID may mask the serine from the effects of a subsequent dose of aspirin.6
The beneficial effects of aspirin in
cardiovascular disease have been attributed to its
inhibitory effects on COX in platelets. In these cells,
thromboxane (Tx) synthase further catalyzes the conversion
of PGH2 to
TxA2,7 which exerts proaggregatory,
vasoconstrictor, and proliferative effects via a membrane-bound, G
proteincoupled receptor, the TP.8 Two isoforms (
and
ß) of the TP have been cloned,8 9 both of which are
transcribed in human platelets, although only TP
appears to be
translated.10 Transcripts of both isoforms are present
in vascular cells.11 Although the isoforms differ in their
rates of agonist-induced desensitization12 and propensity
to couple with G proteins,13 little is known of their
disparate roles in vivo. The importance of TxA2
in platelet activation is thought to derive principally from its
role as an amplifying signal for other stronger, primary agonists, such
as thrombin and ADP.14 However, the clinical efficacy of
aspirin complements that of ticlopidine,15 a drug that
selectively inhibits platelet aggregation induced by ADP but not TP
agonists ex vivo. Clopidogrel, a close relative of ticlopidine, appears
to act by a similar mechanism.15 In a large-scale clinical
trial, clopidogrel emerged as slightly more efficacious than aspirin in
the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction and
stroke.16
The irreversible acetylation of Ser529 by aspirin in the
COX of anucleate platelets explains the cumulative inhibition of
the capacity of platelets to generate TxA2,
commonly measured as serum concentrations of its hydrolysis product
TxB2. Thus, daily administration of 75 mg of
aspirin takes 3 to 4 days to inhibit completely serum
TxB2 ex vivo.17 Interestingly, like
low-dose aspirin, 75 mg of clopidogrel also takes several days to
inhibit platelet function ex vivo, perhaps owing to the gradual
accumulation of a metabolite that binds to a subclass of purinergic
receptors, although this has yet to be established in vivo. As in the
case of aspirin, loading doses of clopidogrel have been investigated
and are likely to be employed in acute settings of vascular occlusion.
Studies designed to assess the potentially additive effects of aspirin
with clopidogrel have been initiated. Finally,
dipyridamole has been reformulated to correct prior
problems with variable and transient bioavailability. This new
preparation has been shown to be as effective as low-dose aspirin in
the secondary prevention of stroke, and the benefit from a combination
of the 2 is roughly additive.18 This has led to the US
Federal Drug Administration approval of an
aspirin-dipyridamole combination for this indication.
Although oral inhibitors of the platelet
glycoprotein
IIb/ßIII have been disappointing, 3
antiplatelet drugslow-dose aspirin, clopidogrel, and
dipyridamolehave been proven effective in the
secondary prevention of cerebrovascular and/or
cardiovascular disease. Their mechanisms of action
suggest that their benefits might be additive, although this remains to
be established in a clinical trial. This has "raised the bar" for
the development of potentially novel therapies in this arena.
The advent of pharmacological inhibitors of the TP19 20 21 inauspiciously coincided with the initial trials establishing the efficacy of aspirin in cardiovascular disease.22 23 24 This confounded their development in 2 ways. First, as the effects of aspirin were attributed to inhibition of TxA2, TP antagonists had little additional benefit to offer. Perhaps preservation of the ability of the vasculature to generate other PGs such as prostacyclin (PGI2) was a plus, but this was a strictly theoretical concept. Against that, it was difficult for TP antagonists to compete against aspirin at 20 cents a tablet. Two clinical trials of TP antagonists were performed, both addressing the possibility that they might modify restenosis after angioplasty.
In the CARPORT (Coronary Artery Restenosis Prevention on Repeated Thromboxane A2 antagonism) study, the antagonist GR32191, given before percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and for 6 months thereafter, did not differ significantly from the effects of intravenous aspirin given immediately before PTCA on luminal diameter as assessed by angiography performed 6 months after the intervention.25 However, the limitations of this uncontrolled experience and of relying on an angiographic end point at a single time were highlighted by the M-HEART (Multi-Hospital Eastern Atlantic Restenosis Trial) II study.26 In that study, all patients received aspirin before PTCA due to its role, by then established, in the prevention of periprocedural myocardial infarction27 but were randomized to continuing treatment with the TP antagonist sulotroban, aspirin, or placebo. In this case, the angiographic estimate of vascular occlusion at 6 months was a secondary end point and did not differ between the groups. By contrast, continued treatment with either aspirin or sulotroban significantly reduced the later myocardial infarction rate in the 6 months after PTCA when compared with the placebo group. These observations left many unanswered questions. First, aside from there being no measure of the degree of synthesis inhibition achieved by aspirin or of TP blockade by either antagonist, the divergence of the time-integrated clinical and "snapshot" angiographic end points in the M-HEART II study illustrated the limited information available from CARPORT. Second, the hypothesis that TP blockade might be superior to aspirin was configured on the preservation of PGI2 formation during TP blockade. PGI2 has significant antiproliferative effects. Both virally delivered PGI synthase and a PGI2 analogue, beraprost, have been shown to reduce significantly the proliferative response to experimental angioplasty.28 29 However, the procedure-related increase in PGI2 biosynthesis, like that in TxA2, is short-lived and suppressed by aspirin in patients undergoing PTCA,30 31 and the patients assigned to sulotroban were receiving aspirin at that time.
Cayette and colleagues32 now report observations that
suggest that reconsideration of the role of TP antagonism is timely.
Using a newly synthesized TP antagonist, S18886, which is
devoid of partial agonist activity, they report that atherogenesis can
be retarded in the apoE-knockout (KO) mouse. Oddly, aspirin has no
effect. One possibility is that inhibition of other COX products by
aspirin, such as PGI2, might have obscured a
benefit from inhibiting TxA2. We now know that
deletion of the PGI2 receptorthe IPresults in
an increased response to thrombotic stimuli in vivo,8 but
the role of this mediator in atherogenesis is unknown. We also now know
that there are 2 forms of COX.4 The second isoform is a
distinct gene product and is readily regulated in its expression by
growth factors, tumor promoters, and cytokines. The tertiary
structures of the 2 enzymes are remarkably similar4 ;
however, the hydrophobic channel of COX-2 is more accommodating. Both
COX isozymes form small amounts of 11(S)- and
15(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic
acids (HETEs). It is unknown whether they contribute to COX actions in
vivo, although some HETEs have been shown to be weak TP agonists in
vitro. 15(S)-HETE can also be formed as a primary
product by the 15-lipoxygenase enzyme. Deletion of
this enzyme reverses atherogenesis in the apoE-KO
mouse.33 Interestingly, unlike the case with COX-1,
inhibition of COX-2dependent PG synthesis by aspirin, but not by
NSAIDs, ex vivo or in vitro is accompanied by increased generation of
both 11- and 15-HETEs, but now in the R stereoconfiguration.
The acetyl residue is thought to force realignment of the
end of
the arachidonic acid carbon chain, which is usually
oriented in an L-shaped configuration in the hydrophobic
channel.34 Mutation to their COX-1 equivalents of 3
residues predicted to be critical to the spatial and flexibility
differences in the COX-2 channel abolishes this feature in the mouse
enzyme.35 Both COX isoforms are present, with
remarkably similar distributions, in human atherosclerotic
plaque.36 Although this may also be true in the
atherosclerotic mouse, it is unknown whether 15(R)-HETE has
any biological effects in aspirin-treated animals. Thus for now, the
role of TP activation by HETEs in explaining the discrepancy between
the effects of aspirin and the TP antagonist in the study
of Cayette and colleagues32 remains quite
speculative. Perhaps the explanation is more mundane. The relationship
between inhibition of the capacity of platelets to generate
TxA2estimated by serum
TxB2and inhibition of Tx-dependent platelet
activation is remarkably nonlinear. Just 5% residual capacity is
sufficient fully to sustain function.37 In the present
study, the aspirin regimen suppressed serum TxB2
by only 70% to 75%, and TP-dependent platelet activation is
likely to have been unimpaired. Clearly, platelets may be a source
of growth factors relevant to atherogenesis, but activation of TPs in
other cells may also be relevant. In tissues other than the
platelet, we have no information as to the relationship between
biosynthetic capacity and function.
Cayette and colleagues32 raise the possibility that the
discrepant results between aspirin and S 18886 might also be explained
if isoprostanes (iPs), free radicalcatalyzed products of
arachidonic acid, played an important role in TP
activation. Indeed, at least 2 iPsiPF2
-III
(also known as
8-iso-PGF2
38 ) and
iPE2-IIIexert potent effects on platelet
function and vascular tone, and these actions are prevented by TP
antagonists and absent in TP-deficient
mice.39 Generation of iPs is increased in both
humans with atherosclerosis40 and in
apoE-KO mice, and iP suppression with vitamin E retards atherogenesis
in this model.41 Perhaps the use of TP
antagonists should be reconsidered in other syndromes in
which oxidant stress and COX activation coincide, such as
occlusion/reperfusion and inflammation. We are at a very early stage in
elucidating the biological actions of iPs and related compounds, some
of which may act as incidental ligands at other PG
receptors.42
Where do the observations of Cayette and colleagues32 lead us? It would certainly be interesting to confirm the effects of the compound in murine models more reminiscent of the human disease.43 It would also be reassuring to confirm that similar effects are observed with structurally distinct antagonists and TP deletion. It remains a formal possibility that the observed effects relate to properties of S 18886 that are unrelated to TP antagonism. Such studies will also increase our sense of the magnitude of the effect we might anticipate with TP antagonism. This seems consistent, but somewhat modest, in the apoE-KO mouse. Should such studies reinforce our confidence, modern imaging modalities such as electron beam CT of the coronary44 or ultrasonography of the carotid arteries45 afford noninvasive approaches to assess the impact of TP antagonism on plaque progression in humans. Reagents are now available for the study of TP expression in human disease,46 and model systems have implicated TP activation in settings previously not considered when these drugs were under development.47 Finally, TP antagonists may even be worth considering as alternative platelet inhibitors to aspirin in certain circumstances. For example, because platelets express COX-1 only, selective inhibitors of COX-2 do not afford cardioprotection. However, in the absence of any actual clinical data, the empiric combination of these drugs with low-dose aspirin has some theoretical limitations. Even low-dose aspirin causes gastrointestinal side effects,48 which may erode the postulated benefit of selective COX-2 inhibition on the gastrointestinal tract. By contrast, TP antagonism has been shown to protect against NSAID-induced enteropathy in the rat.49 Similarly, selective COX-2 inhibitors, NSAIDs, and even low doses of conventionally formulated aspirin depress PGI2 biosynthesis in healthy individuals.50 51 Combination of TP antagonists with COX-2 inhibitors would afford at least similar cardioprotection to that of aspirin25 while sparing PGI2 formation from further suppression.
In summary, the provocative studies of Cayette et al32 draw attention to a class of compounds that were previously abandoned for reasons that were rational at the time. Now that we know more about the breadth of potential TP ligands and are increasingly informed of the biology of PGs as a result of the availability of receptor-deficient mice, it would seem worthwhile to reconsider the contemporary utility of this interesting class of compounds.
References
and ß isoforms.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1425:543559.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
and ß
isoforms: role of the differentially spliced COOH terminus in
agonist-promoted receptor internalization. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:89418948.
-III and
iPE
-III are mediated via the
thromboxane A2 receptor in
vivo. Circulation. In press.
(PGF2
) and the isoprostane,
8-,12-iso-isoprostane F2
-III,
induce cardiomyocyte hypertrophy: differential
activation of downstream signaling pathways. J Biol
Chem. 1998;273:2244222452.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-L. Cracowski and O. Ormezzano Isoprostanes, emerging biomarkers and potential mediators in cardiovascular diseases Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2004; 25(19): 1675 - 1678. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bolla, D. You, L. Loufrani, B. I. Levy, S. Levy-Toledano, A. Habib, and D. Henrion Cyclooxygenase Involvement in Thromboxane-Dependent Contraction in Rat Mesenteric Resistance Arteries Hypertension, June 1, 2004; 43(6): 1264 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Halushka and P. V. Halushka Why Are Some Individuals Resistant to the Cardioprotective Effects of Aspirin?: Could It Be Thromboxane A2? Circulation, April 9, 2002; 105(14): 1620 - 1622. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Praticò, C. Tillmann, Z.-B. Zhang, H. Li, and G. A. FitzGerald Acceleration of atherogenesis by COX-1-dependent prostanoid formation in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice PNAS, March 1, 2001; (2001) 61607398. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pratico, C. Tillmann, Z.-B. Zhang, H. Li, and G. A. FitzGerald Acceleration of atherogenesis by COX-1-dependent prostanoid formation in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice PNAS, March 13, 2001; 98(6): 3358 - 3363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |