Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2000;20:1340-1346

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miettinen, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Group, f. t. F. I. o. t. S. S. S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miettinen, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Group, f. t. F. I. o. t. S. S. S. S.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2000;20:1340.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Noncholesterol Sterols and Cholesterol Lowering by Long-Term Simvastatin Treatment in Coronary Patients

Relation to Basal Serum Cholestanol

T. A. Miettinen; T. E. Strandberg; H. Gylling; for the Finnish Investigators of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group

From the Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Correspondence to Tatu A. Miettinen, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, PO Box 340, FIN-00029 HYKS, Helsinki, Finland. E-mail tatu.a.miettinen{at}helsinki.fi


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Coronary patients with low baseline ratios of serum cholestanol and plant sterols to cholesterol (indicating low cholesterol absorption) but not those with high ratios (high absorption) experienced reduced recurrences of coronary events during simvastatin treatment in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Thus, in the present study, serum cholesterol, its precursor sterols (reflecting cholesterol synthesis), plant sterols (campesterol and sitosterol), and cholestanol were measured before and during a 5-year period of placebo treatment (n=433) and simvastatin treatment (n=434) in patients from a subgroup of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study to determine whether changes in cholesterol synthesis and serum levels were related to cholesterol absorption. Serum cholesterol level was unchanged, the ratios of cholesterol precursor sterols to cholesterol were decreased, and the ratios of plant sterols to cholesterol were increased in relation to increasing baseline ratios of cholestanol quartiles. The latter predicted 5-year ratios and simvastatin-induced reductions of the precursor sterols, with the lowering of the ratios (cholesterol synthesis reduction) being almost twice higher in the lowest versus the highest quartile. The ratios of plant sterols, especially campesterol, to cholesterol were markedly increased during simvastatin treatment, mostly in subjects with the highest baseline cholestanol quartiles. Simvastatin reduced serum cholesterol more (P=0.003) in the lowest versus the highest cholestanol quartile during the 5-year treatment period. The results show for the first time that baseline cholesterol metabolism, measured by serum noncholesterol sterols, predicts the effectiveness of simvastatin in reducing cholesterol synthesis and serum levels of cholesterol. The drug suppresses the synthesis of cholesterol markedly more effectively in subjects with high than with low baseline synthesis but reduces respective serum cholesterol levels less markedly than synthesis. Subjects with high cholesterol absorption and low synthesis may need a combination therapy to lower more effectively their serum cholesterol levels and prevent an increase in the levels of plant sterols.


Key Words: simvastatin • cholesterol lowering • cholestanol • lathosterol • sitosterol


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Human serum contains small amounts of the precursors of cholesterol synthesis, including squalene and methylated and demethylated precursor sterols.1 2 From among the latter sterols, cholestenol, desmosterol, and lathosterol can easily be quantified by gas liquid chromatography (GLC),3 and the whole precursor sterol group is positively related to cholesterol synthesis.1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 In addition, there are other noncholesterol sterols in serum, the most prominent of which are cholestanol and plant sterols (campesterol, sitosterol, and avenasterol). The higher the ratio of these sterols to cholesterol in serum, the higher is cholesterol absorption efficiency.8 10 11 Accordingly, ratios of noncholesterol sterols to cholesterol reflect absorption and synthesis activity of cholesterol, especially their changes by dietary or drug treatments in humans. Preliminary studies of the Finnish subgroup of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)12 revealed that in relation to the placebo group, inhibition of cholesterol synthesis by simvastatin reduced the ratios of the cholesterol precursor sterols to cholesterol by up to one third for the 5-year period of the 4S, increasing correspondingly the ratios of cholestanol and plant sterols to cholesterol. Coronary patients with the highest basal ratios of cholestanol to cholesterol did not show reduced recurrence of coronary events during the simvastatin treatment, whereas those with the lowest respective ratios were benefited by simvastatin treatment compared with placebo.13 It was tempting to interpret the findings on the basis of the different effects of statin in patients with varying absorption and/or synthesis of cholesterol. Thus, patients with a low ratio of cholestanol to cholesterol were considered to have low absorption and high synthesis of cholesterol, a situation that could be ideal for inhibition of cholesterol synthesis by statins. On the other hand, patients with a high ratio of cholestanol to cholesterol most likely had high absorption and low synthesis of cholesterol, so that the condition could be less favorable for the use of synthesis inhibitors. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the associations of baseline cholestanol with other noncholesterol sterols and cholesterol in the sera of a 4S subgroup at baseline and during the placebo and simvastatin treatment periods for up to 5 years. Major interest was focused on the lowering of serum cholesterol precursor sterols and on relating their changes to lowered serum cholesterol during simvastatin treatment of patients with variable basal ratios of cholestanol to cholesterol.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
The 4S population and the intervention methods used have been published previously for the entire 4S cohort.14 15 The present study population included the Finnish 4S subgroup of 867 coronary patients. The serum cholesterol window was 5.5 to 8.0 mmol/L, and triglycerides were <2.5 mmol/L on a lipid-lowering diet before randomization into the placebo and simvastatin groups (n=434 in both groups). The simvastatin dose was initially 20 mg/d, but after 6 weeks of treatment, the dose was increased to 40 mg/d if serum cholesterol values were >5.2 mmol/L.

Analytical Methods
Serum squalene and sterols were measured by GLC.3 16 Thus, total cholesterol, squalene, and noncholesterol sterols, available for the entire present study, were determined from the same GLC run. For GLC, serum was saponified after addition of an internal standard (5{alpha}-cholestane) followed by extraction of nonsaponified material and conversion to trimethylsilyl derivatives. GLC analysis was performed on a 50-m-long SE-30 column with use of an automated Hewlett Packard instrument equipped with an automated peak calculator. Each run quantified squalene, cholesterol, cholestanol, cholestenol, desmosterol, lathosterol, campesterol, sitosterol, and avenasterol, as noted in increasing order of GLC retention times. The avenasterol peak contained trace amounts of sitostanol and a methylated precursor sterol.

The noncholesterol sterols are transported in serum by lipoproteins, mainly by LDL.10 Thus, the decrease in concentration of LDL cholesterol by simvastatin also changes the concentrations of noncholesterol sterols. Therefore, we have expressed the noncholesterol sterols in terms of millimoles per mole of cholesterol, ie, as ratios of noncholesterol sterols to cholesterol, and expressed them in the text as noncholesterol sterol ratios. Ratios of precursor sterols to plant sterols (expressed only for lathosterol/campesterol) were also calculated because this variable reflects synthesis and absorption simultaneously.

Experimental Design
Two serum samples were analyzed from each patient before randomization, and the mean value was calculated for the baseline ratio. Other analyses were made at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 5 years (indicates the end of the 5.4-year study) after baseline assessment from a single serum sample each. The cholesterol value of this method was 7.2% lower than the value of the central laboratory that was used for the entire 4S study.

The patients were ranked by baseline cholestanol ratios into quartiles (Table 1Down). This division into quartiles was used throughout the study for evaluation of the 6-week, 1-year, and 5-year cholesterol and other noncholesterol sterol values and respective changes from the baseline.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Values of Different Variables in Patients Defined by Baseline Quartiles of Cholestanol/Cholesterol Ratio in Finnish Subgroup of 4S Study (n=867)

Statistical Analysis
Mean±SD or mean±SE values were calculated for each quartile. The baseline cholestanol ratios were correlated with the ratios of other variables at the baseline and at 1 and 5 years and with the corresponding changes from the baseline values. The differences between the quartiles, the changes from the baseline, and the differences between the placebo and simvastatin groups in the 4 cholestanol quartiles were analyzed by ANOVA.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Baseline Data
Table 1Up shows the baseline values of different variables by the basal quartiles of the ratio of cholestanol to cholesterol. The cholesterol concentrations and squalene ratios were not different between the quartiles, whereas the ratios of cholestenol, desmosterol, and lathosterol significantly decreased, and those of plant sterols increased.

Baseline ratios of plant sterols to cholesterol were insignificantly related to cholesterol concentrations, but those of cholesterol precursors exhibited weak negative respective correlations (eg, squalene r=-0.235, lathosterol r=-0.140; P<0.001 for both). Also, the ratios of precursor sterols to plant sterols were weakly negatively related to basal cholesterol levels (eg, lathosterol/campesterol r=-0.099; P<0.01); these findings suggest associations of the noncholesterol sterols with basal cholesterol concentration.

Simvastatin and Placebo Treatments
Body Weight
Body weight was increased by 0.34±0.03 kg (P<0.001) in the whole population at 1 year and was similar in all cholestanol quartiles. At 5 years, body weight increased in the survivors by 0.70±0.06 kg (P<0.001) from the baseline value, and it increased gradually from the first to fourth cholestanol quartile by 0.50±0.12, 0.65±0.11, 0.68±0.14, and 0.97±0.13 kg, respectively, without specific simvastatin effect.

Cholesterol Precursors
Correlations of the baseline ratios of cholestanol to cholesterol with different lipid variables and their changes during the study period are shown in Tables 2Down and 3Down, respectively, for the simvastatin group. The correlations remained significantly negative in the placebo group also (not shown) throughout the study for each precursor sterol but not for squalene, which was not changed by simvastatin. The higher the basal ratios of cholestanol to cholesterol, the smaller were the reductions of the ratios of precursor sterol to cholesterol over the 5-year period (Table 3Down); this finding was significant in the placebo group only for lathosterol at 5 years (r=-0.100). The absolute 6-week, 1-year, and 5-year changes in the ratios of lathosterol to cholesterol are illustrated in Figure 1Down by the first and fourth basal cholestanol quartiles (similar curves for the other precursors are not shown). The second and third quartiles were mostly located between the 2 illustrated quartiles, as also shown by the correlations in Table 2Down. The ratios in the placebo group tended to increase gradually from the baseline with time, especially in the fourth quartile (significantly so at 5 years).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Correlations of Baseline, 6 wk, 1-y, and 5-y Variables With Baseline Cholestanol/Cholesterol Ratio in Simvastatin-Treated Subjects in Finnish Subgroup of 4S Study


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Correlations of Changes of 6-wk, 1-y, and 5-y Variables With Baseline Cholestanol/Cholesterol Ratio in Simvastatin-Treated Subjects in Finnish Subgroup of 4S Study



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Changes in ratios of serum lathosterol to cholesterol from baseline in patients defined by baseline cholestanol ratios of lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) quartiles in placebo ({circ}) and simvastatin (•) groups during 5-year treatment. *Statistically significant vs Q4 (ANOVA). {dagger}Statistically significant vs baseline (ANOVA).

The mean 6-week reductions of cholestenol, desmosterol, and lathosterol by simvastatin were 33%, 21%, and 34% from the baseline, but the respective reductions were markedly higher in the first (42%, 26%, and 40%) than in the fourth (24%, 18%, and 30%) quartile. The reductions tended to decrease with treatment time, especially after the first year (Figure 1Up). However, the mean absolute reductions in the ratios of the precursor sterols to cholesterol from the respective placebo values were {approx}2 times higher in the first than in the fourth quartile over the 5-year treatment period (Figure 2Down). The time-dependent increase of the precursor sterol curves in Figure 1Up was explainable by the respective body mass index adjustment only in the placebo group for the first quartile (P<0.05), but it was still significant for other curves (P<0.01).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Changes by simvastatin of ratios of serum cholesterol precursor sterols (cholestenol, desmosterol, and lathosterol) to cholesterol from the respective placebo values in patients defined by baseline cholestanol ratios of lowest (Q1, solid circle) and highest (Q4, solid circle with slash) quartiles during 5-year treatment. Values are mean±SE. *Statistically significant vs Q4; all curves differed significantly from baseline (ANOVA).

Cholestanol and Plant Sterols
The basal ratios of cholestanol to cholesterol were positively related to those of plant sterols and cholestanol also in the placebo group and to changes of plant sterols throughout the study but were negatively related to their own changes (Tables 2Up and 3Up) in the placebo group throughout the study. In the placebo group, the ratios of sitosterol and especially of cholestanol to cholesterol were reduced from the basal values with time significantly more in the fourth than in the first quartile, whereas those of campesterol were similarly increased in all quartiles (Figure 3Down).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Changes of ratios of serum cholestanol, campesterol, and sitosterol to cholesterol from baseline in patients defined by baseline cholestanol ratios of lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) quartiles in placebo ({circ}) and simvastatin (•) groups during 5-year treatment. *Statistically significant vs Q4 (ANOVA). {dagger}Statistically significant vs baseline (ANOVA).

Simvastatin increased the cholestanol ratios from the baseline values significantly more in the first than in the fourth quartile, whereas the highest plant sterol ratios and levels occurred in the fourth quartile (Figures 3Up and 4Down). The increments from the respective placebo values were higher for cholestanol in the first than in the fourth quartile, whereas for the plant sterols, the increments were higher in the fourth than in the first quartile. The differences were virtually similar between the 2 quartiles during the entire treatment period, and the difference even increased with time for campesterol in the fourth quartile.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Serum campesterol concentrations (top) and ratio of serum campesterol to cholesterol (bottom) during simvastatin treatment in first and fourth quartiles in survivors defined by baseline cholestanol ratios. Values are mean±SE.

Serum Cholesterol
In the placebo group, cholesterol did not change significantly during the 5-year period, and it was not related to the baseline cholestanol ratios at any time point (Figure 5Down).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Change in serum cholesterol levels in patients defined by baseline cholestanol ratios of lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) quartiles in placebo ({circ}) and simvastatin (•) groups during 5-year treatment. Values are mean±SE (F=8.62; P=0.003 between Q1 and Q4 for simvastatin group).

Serum cholesterol concentration of the survivors, defined by the first and fourth quartiles of basal cholestanol ratios, was reduced by simvastatin more in the first than in the fourth quartiles (Figure 5Up) despite the significantly lower number of patients (21 versus 36) on high doses of simvastatin. The difference between the 2 quartiles was slight but statistically significant by ANOVA (F=8.62, P=0.003); at 6 weeks, the difference between the 2 quartiles was significant (P<0.001), and the decrease of cholesterol was higher in the first than in the fourth quartile (29.4±0.9% versus 25.6±0.9%, P<0.001). In addition, the baseline cholestanol ratios were positively related to the cholesterol concentrations (Table 2Up) in the simvastatin but not in the placebo group at 6 weeks (r=0.195, P<0.001) and 5 years (r=0.099, P=0.048) and to cholesterol reduction at 6 weeks (Table 3Up; r=0.127, P<0.001).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study relates for the first time baseline cholesterol metabolism to the effectiveness of statin (1) to lower cholesterol synthesis, (2) to increase serum plant sterols, and (3) to reduce serum cholesterol concentration. In the main 4S, the patients needing titration of simvastatin doses from 20 to 40 mg/d had higher basal cholesterol levels than did those not needing the titration for the insufficient cholesterol lowering.17 Our unpublished findings on noncholesterol sterols suggest that the titrated subjects of the present series had high basal absorption and low synthesis of cholesterol and that the increase of the dose enhanced the inhibition of synthesis and lowered cholesterol.

The baseline cholestanol ratio was highly significantly related to other noncholesterol sterols (positively to the plant sterols and negatively to the precursor sterols) in the coronary subjects during the entire study period of 5 years. Similar findings were observed earlier in a small cross-sectional group of randomly selected male subjects on a normal western diet.8 Thus, the subjects in the highest cholestanol quartile have the highest absorption efficiency and the lowest synthesis of cholesterol also among the coronary patients on a cholesterol-lowering diet.

The marked fall in the ratios of the cholesterol precursor sterols can be ascribed to simvastatin-induced inhibition of cholesterol synthesis, a finding reported earlier for different statins in small groups of short-term studies.7 18 19 20 21 22 The baseline cholestanol ratios and quartiles predicted throughout the study the precursor sterol reductions. The correlations in the simvastatin-treated patients are most likely reflecting gradually decreasing cholesterol synthesis in the patients from the lowest to the highest cholestanol quartile. Thus, the markedly higher reduction of the precursor sterol ratios in the first than in the fourth quartile (Figure 1Up) indicates lower inhibitory action of simvastatin on cholesterol synthesis in the highest than in the lowest cholestanol quartile.

Increased body weight increases cholesterol synthesis.23 Thus, the slight gradual increase of body weight, in proportion to the basal cholestanol quartiles, would be expected to stimulate cholesterol synthesis during the 5-year period more in the highest than in the lowest quartiles of the placebo and simvastatin groups. Accordingly, the differences between the simvastatin and placebo curves of the respective quartiles remained virtually unchanged throughout the treatment period (Figure 2Up).

Statin treatment reduces cholesterol absorption in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia,20 in experimental animals on a high but not on a low cholesterol diet,24 25 and in patients with no familial hypercholesterolemia.18 The increased ratios of cholestanol and plant sterols during the simvastatin treatment have been interpreted in our earlier statin studies18 19 20 26 to indicate reduced turnover of cholesterol by decreased synthesis, resulting in reduced biliary elimination of sterols, especially in the fourth quartile, with highest sterol absorption. Reasons are not known for the different responses of cholestanol ratios, especially in relation to campesterol (Figure 3Up), and for the reduction of cholestanol and sitosterol in the placebo group during the 5-year period. It should be borne in mind that the increase of body weight reduces the absorption efficiency of cholesterol and serum plant sterol ratios.27 28

The increased ratios of the plant sterols during the simvastatin treatment in the fourth quartile raise a question about their atherogenicity. Namely, phytosterolemia is strongly atherogenic,29 30 and high plant sterol levels have been suggested to provoke coronary heart disease even in nonsitosterolemic subjects.31 Not only the ratios but also the final 5-year campesterol and sitosterol concentrations were increased in the survivors despite reduced LDL cholesterol concentration, from the usual basal values of <1 mg/dL up to 2.8 and 1.5 mg/dL, respectively. Exchange of this type of sterol mixture with cholesterol of cell membranes or transfer, for instance in LDL, in the arterial walls of the patients may be functionally harmful, as evidenced by phytosterolemia. The atherogenic limit of plant sterol concentrations or of the ratios of plant sterols to cholesterol is not known, but in phytosterolemia, sitosterol concentrations, usually 10 to 30 mg/dL,32 are associated with coronary artery disease at a young age.

It is tempting to suggest that the high baseline absorption and low synthesis of cholesterol results in a less favorable cholesterol lowering in the highest cholestanol quartile. In fact, the higher the basal cholestanol quartile, the lesser was the fall in the serum cholesterol concentration and the higher was the final treatment level of cholesterol even in long-term simvastatin treatment of coronary patients (Figure 5Up). Despite markedly higher reduction of cholesterol synthesis (lowered precursor ratios) by simvastatin in the patients in the lowest versus the highest cholestanol quartile, the respective difference in the serum cholesterol level was markedly lesser. This cholesterol difference alone could not be responsible for the different clinical response13 ; something else, eg, serum plant sterols, would have to be contributing. The change in cholesterol synthesis is weakly related to serum cholesterol lowering, as illustrated by sterol balance studies showing virtually no change or slight reduction in the overall synthesis of body cholesterol and a marked decrease in serum cholesterol by statins.18 26 33 However, in contrast to sterol balance data, the precursor sterol ratios usually show marked decreases during statin treatment. On the other hand, cholestyramine and stanol esters markedly increase cholesterol synthesis, but they do not consistently lower serum cholesterol.34 35

A highly significant negative correlation of the basal cholestanol ratio with ratios of the cholesterol precursor sterols and a positive correlation with ratios of the plant sterols for up to 5 years indicated that the high basal cholestanol quartile still predicted high absorption and low synthesis of cholesterol even for the 5-year survivors in the simvastatin-treated group. Thus, these patients with the high basal cholestanol ratios should be treated with combined stimulation and inhibition of cholesterol synthesis from the very beginning of hypolipidemic treatment. For instance, starting treatment with resins or plant stanol esters stimulates synthesis by respective malabsorption of bile acids or cholesterol, followed by statin-induced inhibition of synthesis in resistant cases.13 36 Replacement of normal dietary fat intake by the same amount of plant stanol ester margarine during a chronic simvastatin treatment actually revealed a more consistent ({approx}10%) fall in the serum cholesterol level of coronary patients with a high versus a low basal cholestanol ratio.37


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by grants from the Finnish Academy of Medical Sciences, the University Central Hospital of Helsinki, and Merck & Co, Inc.

Received August 11, 1999; accepted November 4, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Miettinen TA. Detection of changes in human cholesterol metabolism. Ann Clin Res. 1970;2:300–320.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Miettinen TA. Serum methyl sterols and their distribution between major lipoprotein fractions in different clinical conditions. Ann Clin Res. 1971;3:264–271.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Miettinen TA, Koivisto P. Non-cholesterol sterols and bile acid production in hypercholesterolaemic patients with ileal bypass. In: Paumgartner G, Stiehl A, Gerok W, eds. Bile Acids and Cholesterol in Health and Disease. Lancaster, England: MTP Press; 1983:183–187.
  4. Vuoristo M, Miettinen TA. Serum cholesterol precursor sterols in coeliac disease: effects of gluten-free diet and cholestyramine. Gut. 1986;27:1312–1319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gylling H, Miettinen TA. Serum noncholesterol sterols related to cholesterol metabolism in familial hypercholesterolemia. Clin Chim Acta. 1988;178:41–50.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Färkkilä MA, Tilvis RS, Miettinen TA. Raised plasma cholesterol precursors in patients with gut resections. Gut. 1988;29:188–195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kempen HJM, Glatz JFC, Leuven JAG, Voort van der HA, Katan MB. Serum lathosterol concentration is an indicator of whole-body cholesterol synthesis in humans. J Lipid Res. 1988;29:1149–1155.[Abstract]
  8. Miettinen TA, Tilvis RS, Kesäniemi YA. Serum plant sterols and cholesterol precursors reflect cholesterol absorption and synthesis in volunteers of a randomly selected male population. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131:20–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Björkhem I, Miettinen TA, Reihner E, Ewerth S, Angelin B, Einarsson K. Correlation between serum levels of some cholesterol precursors and activity of HMG-CoA reductase in human liver. J Lipid Res. 1987;28:1137–1143.[Abstract]
  10. Tilvis RS, Miettinen TA. Serum plant sterols and their relation to cholesterol absorption. Am J Clin Nutr. 1986;43:92–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Miettinen TA, Tilvis RS, Kesäniemi YA. Serum cholestanol and plant sterol levels in relation to cholesterol metabolism in middle-aged men. Metabolism. 1989;38:136–140.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Miettinen TA, Strandberg T, Vanhanen HT, Gylling H, for the 4S Group. Noncholesterol serum sterols in Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. In: Gotto AM, Paoletti R, Smith LC, Catapano AL, Jackson AS, eds. Drugs Affecting Lipid Metabolism: Risk Factors and Future Directions. Norwell, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996:473–476.
  13. Miettinen TA, Gylling H, Strandberg T, Sarna S, for the Finnish 4S Investigators. Baseline serum cholestanol predicts recurrent coronary events in a subgroup of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). BMJ. 1998;316:1127–1130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Design and baseline results of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study of patients with stable angina and/or previous myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:393–400.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Miettinen TA. Cholesterol metabolism during ketoconazole treatment in man. J Lipid Res. 1988;29:43–51.[Abstract]
  17. Pedersen TR, Olsson AG, Faergeman O, Kjekshus J, Wedel H, Berg K, Wilhelmsen L, Haghfelt T, Thorgeirsson G, Pyorala K, Miettinen T. Lipoprotein changes and reduction in the incidence of major coronary heart disease events in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Circulation. 1998;97:1453–1460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Vanhanen HT, Miettinen TA. Cholesterol absorption and synthesis during pravastatin, gemfibrozil and their combination. Atherosclerosis. 1995;115:135–146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Miettinen TA, Vanhanen H, Ojala J-P, Tikkanen MJ. Non-cholesterol sterols and faecal elimination of cholesterol during statin and fibrate treatment. Atherosclerosis. 1992;97:S73–S80.
  20. Vanhanen H, Kesäniemi YA, Miettinen TA. Pravastatin lowers serum cholesterol, cholesterol-precursor sterols, fecal steroids, and cholesterol absorption in man. Metabolism. 1992;41:588–595.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Uusitupa MIJ, Miettinen TA, Happonen P, Ebeling T, Turtola H, Voutilainen E, Pyörälä K. Lathosterol and other noncholesterol sterols during treatment of hypercholesterolemia with lovastatin alone and with cholestyramine or guar gum. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:807–813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Réihner E, Rudling M, Ståhlberg D, Berglund L, Ewerth S, Björkhem I, Einarsson K, Angelin B. Influence of pravastatin, a specific inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, on hepatic metabolism of cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:224–228.[Abstract]
  23. Miettinen TA. Cholesterol production in obesity. Circulation. 1974;44:842–850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ishida F, Sato A, Iizuka Y, Sawasaki Y, Aizawa A, Kamei T. Effects of MK-733, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, on absorption and excretion of [3H] cholesterol in rabbits. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988;963:35–41.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Ishida F, Sato A, Iizuka Y, Kitani K, Sawasaki Y, Kamei T. Effects of MK-733 (simvastatin), an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylgluratyl coenzyme A reductase, on intestinal acylcoenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase activity in rabbits. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;1004:117–123.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Gylling H, Miettinen TA. The effects of inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and absorption on cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism in hypercholesterolemic non-insulin dependent diabetic men. J Lipid Res. 1996;37:1776–1785.[Abstract]
  27. Miettinen TA, Kesäniemi YA. Cholesterol absorption: regulation of cholesterol synthesis and elimination and within-population variations of serum cholesterol levels. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;49:629–635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Miettinen TA. Regulation of serum cholesterol by cholesterol absorption. In: Parnham MJ, Niemann R, eds. Agents and Actions Supplements: AAS 26. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag; 1988:53–65.
  29. Björkhem I, Boberg KM. Inborn errors in bile acid biosynthesis and storage of sterols other than cholesterol. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1995:2073–2099.
  30. Lütjohann D, von Bergmann K. Phytosterolaemia. Diagnosis, characterization and therapeutic approaches. Ann Med. 1997;29:181–184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Glueck CJ, Speirs J, Tracy T, Streicher P, Illig E, Vandegrift J. Relationships of serum plant sterols (phytosterols) and cholesterol in 595 hypercholesterolemic subjects, and familial aggregation of phytosterols, cholesterol, and premature coronary heart disease in hyperphytosterolemic probands and their first-degree relatives. Metabolism. 1991;40:842–848.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Patel SB, Salen G, Hikada H, Kwiterovich Jr PO, Stalenhoef AFH, Miettinen TA, Grundy SM, Lee M-H, Rubenstein JS, Polymeropoulos MH, Brownstein MJ. Mapping a gene involved in regulating dietary cholesterol absorption: the sitosterolemia locus is found at chromosome 2p21. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:1041–1044.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Grundy SM, Bilheimer DW. Inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase by mevinolin in familial hypercholesterolemia heterozygotes: effects on cholesterol balance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:2538–2542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Miettinen TA. Cholesterol and bile acid synthesis in two families with homozygous and heterozygous hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis. 1984;4:383–388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Gylling H, Siimes M, Miettinen TA. Sitostanol ester margarine in dietary hypolipidemic treatment of children with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Lipid Res. 1995;36:1807–1812.[Abstract]
  36. Gylling H, Rajaratnam R, Miettinen TA. Reduction of serum cholesterol in postmenopausal women with previous myocardial infarction and cholesterol malabsorption induced by dietary sitostanol ester margarine. Circulation. 1997;96:4226–4231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Gylling H, Miettinen TA. Sitostanol ester added to long term simvastatin treatment of coronary patients with low and high basal cholesterol absorption. Atherosclerosis. 1997;134:157. Abstract.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Helske, T. Miettinen, H. Gylling, M. Mayranpaa, J. Lommi, H. Turto, K. Werkkala, M. Kupari, and P. T. Kovanen
Accumulation of cholesterol precursors and plant sterols in human stenotic aortic valves
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1511 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. J. H. Jones
Ingestion of Phytosterols is Not Potentially Hazardous
J. Nutr., November 1, 2007; 137(11): 2485 - 2485.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. P. Fransen, H. Verhagen, J. Plat, and R. P. Mensink
Reply to Dr. Jones
J. Nutr., November 1, 2007; 137(11): 2486 - 2486.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. L. Garcia-Otin, M. Cofan, M. Junyent, D. Recalde, A. Cenarro, M. Pocovi, E. Ros, and F. Civeira
Increased Intestinal Cholesterol Absorption in Autosomal Dominant Hypercholesterolemia and No Mutations in the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor or Apolipoprotein B Genes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3667 - 3673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. P. Fransen, N. de Jong, M. Wolfs, H. Verhagen, W.M. M. Verschuren, D. Lutjohann, K. von Bergmann, J. Plat, and R. P. Mensink
Customary Use of Plant Sterol and Plant Stanol Enriched Margarine Is Associated with Changes in Serum Plant Sterol and Stanol Concentrations in Humans
J. Nutr., May 1, 2007; 137(5): 1301 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. Plat, I. Beugels, M. J. J. Gijbels, M. P. J. de Winther, and R. P. Mensink
Plant sterol or stanol esters retard lesion formation in LDL receptor-deficient mice independent of changes in serum plant sterols
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 2762 - 2771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
G. C. Ness, R. C. Holland, and D. Lopez
Selective Compensatory Induction of Hepatic HMG-CoA Reductase in Response to Inhibition of Cholesterol Absorption.
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2006; 231(5): 559 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. P. Radermecker and A. J. Scheen
Serum Plant Sterols and Atherosclerosis: Is There a Place for Statin-Ezetimibe Combination?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1496 - 1497.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. A. Miettinen, M. Railo, M. Lepantalo, and H. Gylling
Plant Sterols in Serum and in Atherosclerotic Plaques of Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1794 - 1801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. Plat, M. C. E. Bragt, and R. P. Mensink
Common sequence variations in ABCG8 are related to plant sterol metabolism in healthy volunteers
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 68 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. R. Wilund, L. Yu, F. Xu, G. L. Vega, S. M. Grundy, J. C. Cohen, and H. H. Hobbs
No Association Between Plasma Levels of Plant Sterols and Atherosclerosis in Mice and Men
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2004; 24(12): 2326 - 2332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G. R Thompson
Management of dyslipidaemia
Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): 949 - 955.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
A. Rees
Review: Ezetimibe -- clinical and pharmacological profile
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, May 1, 2004; 4(3): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
G. C. Ness and K. R. Gertz
Increased Sensitivity to Dietary Cholesterol in Diabetic and Hypothyroid Rats Associated with Low Levels of Hepatic HMG-CoA Reductase Expression
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2004; 229(5): 407 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
G. C. Ness and K. R. Gertz
Hepatic HMG-CoA Reductase Expression and Resistance to Dietary Cholesterol
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2004; 229(5): 412 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
N. R. Matthan, A. Giovanni, E. J. Schaefer, B. G. Brown, and A. H. Lichtenstein
Impact of simvastatin, niacin, and/or antioxidants on cholesterol metabolism in CAD patients with low HDL
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 800 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
P. Nieminen, A.-M. Mustonen, P. Lindstrom-Seppa, V. Karkkainen, H. Mussalo-Rauhamaa, and J. V.K. Kukkonen
Phytosterols Affect Endocrinology and Metabolism of the Field Vole (Microtus agrestis)
Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2003; 228(2): 188 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
H. Gylling and T. A. Miettinen
Inheritance of cholesterol metabolism of probands with high or low cholesterol absorption
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2002; 43(9): 1472 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G.R. Thompson, F. O'Neill, and M. Seed
Why some patients respond poorly to statins and how this might be remedied
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2002; 23(3): 200 - 206.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Ballantyne, A. G. Olsson, T. J. Cook, M. F. Mercuri, T. R. Pedersen, and J. Kjekshus
Influence of Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Elevated Triglyceride on Coronary Heart Disease Events and Response to Simvastatin Therapy in 4S
Circulation, December 18, 2001; 104(25): 3046 - 3051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
F. H. O'Neill, D. D. Patel, B. L. Knight, C. K. Y. Neuwirth, M. Bourbon, A. K. Soutar, G. W. Taylor, G. R. Thompson, and R. P. Naoumova
Determinants of Variable Response to Statin Treatment in Patients With Refractory Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(5): 832 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager