Thrombosis |
From the Cardiovascular Biology Research Laboratory (A.G.Z., J.I.O., V.F., S.G.W., G.H., O.X.R., J.J.B.), Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute (J.H.C., V.F., J.J.B.), and the Department of Pathology (J.T.F.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; Regions Hospital (A.P.), St. Paul, Minn; and Montreal Heart Institute (R.G.), Montreal, Canada.
Correspondence to Dr J.J. Badimon, Director, Cardiovascular Biology Research Laboratory, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Box 1030, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6574. E-mail jbadimo{at}smtplink.mssm.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: platelets thrombus antithrombotics radioisotopes
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Current methods for the diagnosis of thrombus formation in the clinical setting include intravascular ultrasound, angiography, and angioscopy. All of these are invasive and qualitative, and the results are limited to a single time point of an ongoing dynamic process. Furthermore, their invasive nature does not permit the continuous and quantitative monitoring of thrombus growth or assess the efficacy of treatment over time. Noninvasive methods such as vascular ultrasound are qualitative, not specific for thrombus, and time consuming, and they require frequent recordings to monitor change in volume as a marker for thrombus growth.3 Biochemical markers of thrombus formation and vessel occlusion are both insensitive and inadequate for quantifying thrombus formation.4 5 Thus, clinical development of new antithrombotic therapies has relied on "all or none" symptoms, with often dire consequences of death, myocardial infarction, or arterial occlusion.6 7 These occur with a relatively low incidence and are insensitive to gradations of thrombus growth. Consequently, clinical studies for determining optimal dosage or drug combinations to reduce thrombus formation are expensive, time consuming, and insensitive and require moderate to large numbers of patients, and the end points are potentially dangerous to patients.8
Animal models, such as the Folts model,9 monitor changes in flow and obstruction to flow as a surrogate for in vivo thrombosis. This model is amenable for the study of antiplatelet drugs in a dose-dependent manner and has significantly increased our knowledge of these agents. However, it has limitations of the inability to monitor or quantify dynamic thrombus formation and inability to mimic the high thrombogenicity and minor initial obstruction associated with initial plaque disruption.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the sensitivity and feasibility of using the new technique for continuous in vivo isotope monitoring compared with changes in Doppler flow velocity for quantifying thrombus growth. Using a portable miniaturized gamma detector, we report that the continuous monitoring of platelet deposition and its rate of growth better quantifies total thrombus formation than does assessing changes in flow velocity.
We hypothesized that changes in 111Inlabeled platelet deposition would result before changes in arterial blood flow and that the former would more accurately reflect the amount of mural thrombus formed after deep arterial injury.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design
After an overnight fast, blood was withdrawn on the morning of
the experiment, and autologous platelets were labeled with
111In as previously reported.10
After complete hemostasis, the autologously labeled platelets were
reinjected within 3 hours of withdrawal. All the animals were sedated
with 15 mg/kg IM ketamine (Ketaset, Fort Dodge Animal Health).
Deep anesthesia was induced with 25 mg/kg IV pentobarbital
(Veterinary Laboratories Inc) and maintained by injections of 130 to
195 mg every 30 to 40 minutes to minimize hemodynamic
changes. Throughout the 2-hour study period, the flow rate in the
contralateral control carotid artery did not fall below 350 mL/min.
Animals were intubated and ventilated with a Harvard respirator, and
ECG was monitored throughout the experiment.
The carotid artery was exposed through a midline neck incision, and the miniature gamma detector was placed above the artery. A Doppler flowmeter (Transonic Flow Systems) was placed around the artery distal to the injury, and flow rates were recorded at 5-minute intervals. After injury, the vessel was bathed with 1% lidocaine solution to prevent vasospasm. Blood was collected for baseline determination of platelet number and activated partial thromboplastin time.
The gamma spectrometry system was activated, and on stabilization of radioactivity (10 minutes) at baseline, a 1-cm length of the carotid artery was deeply injured by external crush (6 serial hemostat crushes to the second ratchet of 5-second duration interspaced with 5-second rest periods) with a hemostatic clamp capable of distributing a homogeneous circumferential pressure on the vessel wall (7-62 Lahey hemostatic forceps curved, Miltex Instrument Co). The crush was always performed with the same hemostat and by 1 operator to minimize variability. Characterization of vascular injury by this methodology has been extensively studied for reproducibility.10 11 12 13 14 At the end of the 2-hour monitoring period, the injured segment of carotid artery was removed, after which the animal was euthanized (Sleepaway, Fort Dodge Animal Health). The carotid arteries were rinsed gently in 0.01 mol/L PBS and immediately transferred to 4% paraformaldehyde solution. The carotid arteries were later sectioned at 4-mm intervals and kept in fresh fixative. Specimens were then paraffin-embedded, sectioned at 5-µm sections, and routinely stained with combined Masson and elastin techniques.
Study Protocol
Three different antithrombotic regimens (heparin, oral aspirin,
and hirudin) were compared against baseline (animals receiving
intravenous saline, n=5).
For the heparin regimen (n=5), an intravenous bolus of 100 IU/kg heparin followed by an intravenous infusion of 100 IU/kg per hour was started 30 minutes before injury.
For the aspirin regimen (n=5), oral aspirin (160 mg/d) was given for 2 days before the start of the experiment. On the day of the experiment, aspirin was administered as an intravenous bolus of 1 mg/kg started 30 minutes before injury.
For the hirudin regimen (n=5), hirudin was administered 30 minutes before the start of the experiment as an initial bolus of 1 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.8 mg/kg per hour.
Detectors
The detectors (Eurorad), shown in Figure 1
, were of the following specifications:
spectrometer grade CdTe detector, 440 mV/meV (10 mmx17
mmx5 mm); FET stage in Densimet housing, Al window; optimum
energy range, 20 to 300 keV.
|
The detectors were connected to a preamplifier (TPR306SF, Eurorad) that was optimized for the CdTe sensor and FET amplifier and that had a 0.5-µs shaping time.
The preamplifier was connected to Canberra NaI/plus boards installed in a personal computer containing a Pentium (Intel) microchip. Gamma spectrometry software specifically written for the detectors (GammaSys 1.0. Lorenz Strahlenmeßsysteme) was installed and allowed sequential counting in up to 3 regions of interest for user-specified time intervals.
Monitoring of Platelet-Thrombus Growth
Continuous monitoring was performed for 2 hours, and actual
total counts over the region of interest were recorded in 2-minute
cycles. The kinetics of platelet-thrombus growth was assessed as
changes in the radioactivity counts over the same area.
At the end of the experiment, the net counts were corrected for decay for the duration of the counting period. Platelet counts were obtained at half-hour intervals, and blood samples at the same time were assessed for activity in a gamma counter. The same blood samples were counted with the use of the miniature detectors. Adjusted radioactivity counts were subsequently converted to platelets deposited over the injured segment.14
Evaluation of Platelet-Thrombus Growth
The kinetics of thrombus growth was recorded as
platelets deposited every 2 minutes for 2 hours. The rate of
thrombus growth at the site of injury was assessed by determining the
slope of the curve in the first 30 minutes after crush. The extent of
thrombus formation and its stability was determined by calculating the
area under the curve for the observation period after crush, and this
was compared with the thrombus formation determined by morphometric
analysis of the histological specimens.
Morphometric Analysis
The histopathologic sections were digitized to a Macintosh
computer from a camera (3CCD Video Camera, Sony) attached to a Zeiss
Axioskop light microscope. Cross-sectional areas of the
arterial lumen and luminal thrombus were determined by
manual tracing with ImagePro Plus (Media Cybernetics). A separate
investigator, blinded to the antithrombotic treatment, performed each
analysis. From this analysis, the percentage of
thrombus occupying the vessel lumen was determined.
Data Analysis
Individual values of platelet counts at the various time
points were averaged, and the mean platelet deposition for each
study group was plotted over time. The mean flow in the carotid artery
at baseline and during the last 30 minutes was recorded, and
percentage decrease in flow from baseline to the end of the experiment
calculated. All results are presented as mean±SEM. All
statistical analyses were performed by the Student t
test (unpaired observations). Statistical significance was considered
as a 2-tailed probability (P<0.05).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
45 minutes after crush
injury. Thereafter, the jagged edge profile of the graph,
representing instability and embolization and regrowth of
thrombus, is demonstrated after 60 minutes with fluctuations in the
platelet count. Total thrombus formation is represented
by the area under the curve from the time of crush injury to the end of
the 2-hour observation period.
|
The rate of platelet deposition (slope of curve,
plateletsx106 per minute) presented
in Figure 3
reveals the fastest rate of
platelet deposition in control animals, leading ultimately to total
occlusion of the vessel. Aspirin-treated (1.67±0.34) and
heparin-treated (1.55±0.30) animals demonstrated moderately reduced
rates of platelet deposition compared with control animals
(3.53±0.34, P<0.01), whereas hirudin-treated (0.25±0.03)
animals demonstrated the lowest rate of platelet deposition
(P<0.05 compared with the heparin-treated group).
|
Total platelet-thrombus deposition, estimated as area under the
curve (plateletsxminutesx106) during the
observation period, is presented in Figure 4
. Control animals demonstrated the
highest platelet deposition over time (11.7±1.28) compared with
values in the aspirin-treated animals (6.13±0.91, P<0.05),
and hirudin-treated animals demonstrated the least platelet
deposition over time (0.2±0.01) compared with values in
heparin-treated animals (2.45±0.34, P<0.01).
|
Flow
For all animals, platelet deposition detected by the
miniaturized detectors preceded changes in flow. The percentage
decrease in flow rate from baseline is shown in Figure 5
and was most marked in the control
group (99±0.34%, P<0.01 compared with other groups). Flow
was absent 1 hour after injury in the control animals. The reductions
in flow for both the aspirin- and heparin-treated groups were similar
(39±9.1% and 36±12.5%, respectively; P=NS), and
hirudin-treated animals demonstrated only a 17±5.4% reduction from
baseline (P=NS compared with aspirin- and heparin-treated
animals). Flow during the 2-hour observation period is shown in Figure 6
. Flow distal to the injury decreased in
all vessels and became undetectable in the control animals at the point
of maximal platelet deposition. The flow rates for all the
experiments demonstrated an inverse relation to both the rate of
platelet deposition and the total platelet-thrombus formation.
The control group had a noticeable reduction in flow 40 minutes after
injury, whereas platelet deposition at the injury site was evident
after 10 minutes. In the aspirin-, heparin-, and hirudin-treated
groups, flow was reduced after maximal platelet deposition, but
vessel patency was maintained throughout.
|
|
Effect of Treatment
An immediate increase in platelet deposition (Figure 7
) was seen for all experiments after
severe injury. In contrast to control animals, animals treated with
antithrombotics demonstrated a more gradual increase over this time
period, ultimately reaching a much lower plateau. For all animals,
increased platelet deposition was associated with decreased flow.
The most effective agent in reducing the rate of growth and total
platelet-thrombus formation was the direct thrombin
inhibitor hirudin. Of importance, none of this group
demonstrated fluctuations in platelet deposition, indicating
stability of thrombus.
|
The ratios of activated partial thromboplastin time to baseline that were measured 1 hour (and 2 hours) after injury were as follows: control, 0.95 (1.0); aspirin, 1.15 (1.1); heparin, 3.86 (3.7); and hirudin, 2.61 (3.1).
Histological Analysis
Histological analysis revealed the degree
of injury to be similar in all experiments as previously shown with use
of the above technique to induce arterial
injury.10 11 12 13 All control vessels were occluded
(>99±0.63% occlusion of vessel lumen, P=0.02 compared
with aspirin-treated group and P<0.01 compared with
heparin- and hirudin-treated groups). Aspirin- and heparin-treated
animals revealed platelet-thrombus occlusion involving 43±14.3%
and 30±5.6% of the vessel lumen, respectively (P=NS). One
of the 5 aspirin-treated animals had total occlusion of the vessel.
None of the 5 heparin-treated animals had total occlusion. In spite of
similar degrees of injury, hirudin-treated animals had the least amount
of thrombus formation (10±1.8% of vessel lumen area,
P=0.02 compared with heparin-treated animals and
P=0.08 compared with aspirin-treated animals), with no
animal demonstrating complete occlusion.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The importance of documenting quantitative changes in platelet deposition rather than change in flow is highlighted by the difference between heparin and aspirin. Increased platelet deposition for aspirin was clearly evident on the real-time curve; consequently, the area under the curve was greater. However, the decrease in flow for the 2 groups was similar, and this criterion alone would fail to distinguish the relative antiplatelet potency of the 2 drugs. Thus, it is apparent that the described method for quantifying platelet deposition increases the sensitivity of assessing efficacy between different antithrombotic treatments.
In addition, our results show that this new model allows quantification of both the rate and amount of platelet deposition at the site of arterial injury and can be used as an assay for antithrombotic drugs. This technique can be applied to other animal species, such as dogs, nonhuman primates, and rabbits.
Currently available models of thrombus monitoring fail to give real-time dynamic quantification of thrombus formation. Certain criteria are prerequisites for any model designed to study platelet deposition and thrombosis.9 First, to maximize thrombus formation, the technique should produce controlled degrees of intimal and medial damage with exposure of subintimal structures. The extent of deep compared with subendothelial injury induced is of critical importance and determines the extent of the resulting thrombus formation. Second, the rate and amount of platelet deposition at the injury site should be detectable. Third, the rate and amount of platelet deposition and ultimate luminal narrowing should correlate with flow measured distal to the occlusion. Fourth, the technique should be specific for thrombus, reliable, and reproducible, thus allowing dose-response curves for different antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs to be established. Finally, any model designed to study the dose-response relation of drugs in a clinical model should, ideally, be noninvasive.
One of the most widely used models to study platelet aggregation and thrombosis is the Folts coronary thrombosis model of cyclic flow variations.9 This model is based on cyclic flow reductions resulting from periodic acute occlusive platelet thrombus followed by embolization.15 It uses flow as a surrogate for thrombus formation. Its advantages are that it meets most of the above criteria and is reproducible. However, it fails to monitor the rate of change of thrombus formation or dissolution, is not specific for thrombus, and does not quantify platelet deposition. Therefore, it is less sensitive for comparison of different antithrombotic agents.
Morphometric analysis is able to provide detailed information, but the method is time consuming and limited to end-point measurements.16 In animal models, thrombus formation can be quantified by measuring the deposition of autologous radiolabeled platelets continuously in a gamma scintillation counter.17 18 Dynamic measurements have also been performed in nonhuman primates by placing the subject in a gamma scintillation camera.19 We previously reported the use of a gamma camera and computer-assisted nuclear scintigraphy to dynamically monitor platelet deposition.20 However, both methods are cumbersome and, therefore, not readily applicable to a clinical setting.
We validated our method by testing commonly used antithrombotic agents against control animals and correlated the results with change in flow and histological analysis of the injured artery. The effect of these commonly used drugs on platelet deposition is well known.21 Our model confirmed the weak antiplatelet effects of aspirin,22 the modest effect of heparin, and the potent effect of hirudin but, importantly, showed that compared with flow measurements, monitoring continuous isotope-labeled platelet deposition can more sensitively quantify thrombus formation, even before changes in flow or total occlusion occur.
This isotope model of continuous quantification of platelet deposition appears valuable and could be used as an assay to test the dose-response relation of new drugs in a clinical setting. The surface detectors are small and can be applied over superficial arteries. Furthermore, they are able to record 3 isotopes simultaneously and, thus, would also permit the monitoring of radiolabeled fibrinogen and red blood cell response to injury. For dose-response studies, smaller numbers of patients would be needed, expense would be reduced, and patient safety would be improved because death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or arterial occlusion would not be necessary for phase II dose-response studies.
We have shown that this new model meets all of the criteria required for sensitive quantification of thrombus growth and dissolution after platelet deposition after arterial injury. The model permits the safe and accurate in vivo evaluation of antithrombotic drugs with a significant reduction in the number of subjects needed. It allows quantification of dynamic thrombus formation, thus reducing the risk of arterial occlusion or end-organ damage in clinical dosing studies. More important, the noninvasive and portable nature of this technique makes it ideal to assess the efficacy of new antithrombotic agents in humans. Ongoing studies are directed toward monitoring acute thrombus growth after peripheral vascular intervention.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 6, 1999; accepted October 15, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Fuster V, Falk E, Fallon JT, Badimon L, Chesebro JH, Badimon JJ. The three processes leading to post PTCA restenosis: dependence on the lesion substrate. Thromb Haemost. 1995;74:552559.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Eisert WG, van Reyn J, Birk G, Hoffman B, Schlachetzki
F, Kubale R, Schneider E, Hoffman U. Noninvasive method for measuring
thrombus formation in patients after peripheral angioplasty
using three-dimensional B-mode and color-coded Doppler
ultrasonography. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;37:79S83S.
4. Hanson SR, Griffin JH, Harker LA, Kelly AB, Esmon CT, Gruber A. Antithrombotic effects of thrombin-induced activation of endogenous protein C in primates. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:20032012.
5.
Diquelou A, Lemozy S, Depoy D, Boneu B, Sakariassen
KS, Cadroy Y. Effect of blood flow on thrombin generation is dependent
on the nature of the nature of the thrombogenic surface.
Blood. 1994;84:22062213.
6. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996;348:13291339.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded
Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) IIa Investigators. Randomized trial
of intravenous heparin versus recombinant hirudin for acute
coronary syndromes. Circulation. 1994;90:16311637.
8.
Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic
Syndrome Management (PRISM) Study Investigators. A comparison of
aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina.
N Engl J Med. 1998;338:14981505.
9. Folts J. An in vivo model of experimental arterial stenosis, intimal damage, and periodic thrombus. Circulation. 1991;83(suppl IV):IV-3IV-14.
10.
Wysokinski WE, McBane RD, Owen WG. Individual
propensity for arterial thrombosis. Arterioscler
Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:883886.
11. McBane RD, Wysokinski WE, Chesebro JH, Owen WG. Antithrombotic action of endogenous porcine protein C activated with a latent porcine thrombin preparation. Thromb Haemost. 1995;74:879885.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
McBane RD Miller RS, Hassinger NL, Chesebro JH,
Nemerson Y, Owen WG. Tissue prothrombin: universal distribution in
smooth muscle. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:24302437.
13. Wysokinski W, McBane R, Chesebro JH, Owen WG. Reversibility of platelet thrombosis in vivo: quantitative analysis in porcine carotid arteries. Thromb Haemost. 1996;76:11081113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Galvez A, Chesebro JH, Fuster V.
Influence of arterial damage and wall shear rate on
platelet deposition: ex vivo study in a swine model.
Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:312320.
15.
Folts JD, Gallagher KP, Rowe GG. Blood flow reductions
in stenosed canine coronary arteries: vasospasm or platelet
aggregation? Circulation. 1982;65:248255.
16. Sakariassen KS, Kuhn H, Muggli R, Baumgartner HR. Growth and stability of thrombi in flowing citrated blood: assessment of platelet-surface interactions with computer-assisted morphometry. Thromb Haemost. 1988;60:392398.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Kotze HF, Lamprecht S, Badenhorst PN. A four hour
infusion of recombinant hirudin results in long-term inhibition of
arterial-type thrombosis in baboons. Blood. 1995;85:31583163.
18.
Gruber A, Hanson SR, Kelly AB, Yan BS, Bang N, Griffin
JH, Harker LA. Inhibition of thrombus formation by activated
recombinant protein C in a primate model of arterial
thrombosis. Circulation. 1990;82:578585.
19. Schneider PA, Kotze HF, Heyns. A du P, Hanson SR. Thromboembolic potential of synthetic vascular grafts in baboons. J Vasc Surg. 1989;10:7582.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Lassila R, Badimon JJ, Vallabhajosula S, Badimon L.
Dynamic monitoring of platelet deposition on severely damaged
vessel wall in flowing blood: effects of different stenoses on
thrombus growth. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:306315.
21.
Heras M, Chesebro JH, Webster MW, Mruk JS, Grill DE,
Penny WJ, Bowie EJ, Badimon L, Fuster V. Hirudin, heparin and placebo
during deep arterial injury in the pig: the in vivo role of
thrombin in platelet-mediated thrombosis. Circulation. 1990;82:14761484.
22.
Folts JD, Schafer AI, Loscalzo J, Willerson JT, Muller
JE. A perspective on the potential problems with aspirin as an
anti-thrombotic agent: a comparison of studies in an animal model with
clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:295303.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Kozlovaite, P. Grybauskas, J. Cimbolaityte, A. Mongirdiene, A. Puodziukynas, T. Kazakevicius, and J. Ptasekas Influence of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation on Platelet Aggregation Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, October 1, 2007; 13(4): 416 - 421. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sirol, V. Fuster, J. J. Badimon, J. T. Fallon, J.-F. Toussaint, and Z. A. Fayad Chronic Thrombus Detection With In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Fibrin-Targeted Contrast Agent Circulation, September 13, 2005; 112(11): 1594 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |