Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Helsinki, Finland.
Correspondence to Hannele Yki-Järvinen, MD, University of Helsinki, Department of Medicine, PO Box 340, 00029 HUCH, Helsinki, Finland. E-mail ykijarvi{at}helsinki.fi
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endothelium atherosclerosis vasodilatation insulin therapy type 2 diabetes
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is diminished in atherosclerotic coronary arteries3 4 and characterizes patients at risk of developing atherosclerosis, such as those with hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension.5 6 7 In patients with type 2 diabetes, the impaired vasodilator response to endothelium-dependent vasodilators, such as acetylcholine (ACh), has been a rather consistent finding.8 9 10 11 12 In addition, responses to endothelium-independent vasodilator agents, such as sodium nitroprusside (SNP), have been found to be impaired in many8 11 although not all9 13 studies. These data suggest that the function of endothelial or vascular smooth muscle cells or both may be abnormal in type 2 diabetic patients. It is also possible that inactivation of exogenous and endogenous nitric oxide is increased.14 It is currently unknown, however, whether these defects are inherent features of type 2 diabetes or secondary to metabolic alterations such as chronic hyperglycemia,15 16 increases in free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations,17 18 19 20 21 or other lipid abnormalities.18 22 23 Regarding insulin, acute studies have shown that although physiological changes in circulating insulin concentrations do not alter blood flow, they potentiate ACh-induced vasodilatation.24 The only treatment study hitherto performed in type 2 diabetes examined effects of antioxidants on endothelial function.10
The present study was undertaken to determine whether insulin therapy changes in vivo endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Because metformin diminishes weight gain during insulin therapy and may improve cardiovascular outcome,25 we chose to study the effects of 6 months of combination therapy with insulin and metformin on endothelial function. These data were compared with a group of normal subjects and with a group of type 2 diabetic patients chronically treated with metformin.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The type 2 diabetic patients were recruited from diabetes
outpatient clinics in the Helsinki area on the basis of the following
criteria: (1) aged 40 through 70 years, (2) treatment with metformin
alone, (3) glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C)
>8.5% (reference range 4.0% to 6.0%), (4) current body mass index
<35 kg/m2, (5) duration of diabetes >3 years,
and (6) no history of ketoacidosis. Exclusion criteria included the
following: (1) clinically significant cardiovascular,
hepatic, neurological, endocrinologic, or other major systemic disease,
(2) retinopathy requiring laser treatment, (3) an
elevated serum creatinine concentration, (4) history of
drug or alcohol abuse, and (5) mental illness rendering the subjects
unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of
the study. Informed written consent was obtained after the purpose,
nature, and potential risks were explained to the subjects. The
experimental protocol was designed and performed according to the
principles of Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Ethical
Committee of the Helsinki University Central Hospital.
Insulin Therapy
Patients considered eligible to participate in the study met
with the doctor and the diabetes nurse 4 weeks before the start of
insulin treatment. At this visit, the patients underwent a complete
history and physical examination. The patients were instructed to
measure their fasting blood glucose concentrations and to record
any episode of symptomatic hypoglycemia daily. The patients
then visited the laboratory for measurement of fasting blood glucose,
HbA1c, serum concentrations of
creatinine, liver enzymes, and the urinary albumin
excretion rate. An ECG was also recorded. The results of the
laboratory tests were checked, and if acceptable, an
endothelial function test was performed before the
start of insulin treatment with bedtime human isophane. Treatment with
metformin was continued without changing the metformin dose. The
patients were taught self-adjustment of the insulin dose on the basis
of fasting plasma glucose measurements. The patients were asked to
increase the dose by 2 and 4 IU/d if the fasting plasma glucose
exceeded 144 and 180 mg/dL on 3 consecutive measurements. The goal was
to lower fasting plasma glucose to
108 mg/dL and
HbA1c to <7.5%.25 The patients
visited the hospital outpatient clinic monthly for 3 months after start
of insulin therapy and then at 3-month intervals. The second
endothelial function test was performed after the
outpatient visit at 6 months.
To determine the degree of variation in endothelial function attributable to the method and continued treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with metformin, 6 type 2 diabetic patients who had been treated with metformin for 1.2±0.4 years (6 men, aged 53±2 years, body mass index 28±1 kg/m2, duration of diabetes 5±1 years, and HbA1c 9.1±0.4%) were studied twice with a 6-month interval.
Measurements
In Vivo Endothelial Function Test
In vivo endothelial function was determined by
measuring forearm blood flow responses to intra-arterial
infusions of endothelium-dependent (ACh) and
-independent (SNP) vasodilators. The study was begun after a 10- to
12-hour fast at 7:30 AM. Venous blood samples were
withdrawn for measurement of plasma glucose and serum free insulin,
HbA1C, FFA, triglyceride, HDL, and
total cholesterol concentrations. A 27-gauge unmounted
steel cannula (Coopers Needle Works) connected to an epidural catheter
(Portex) was inserted into the left brachial artery. Drugs were infused
at a constant rate of 1 mL/min with infusion pumps (Braun AG). Subjects
rested in a supine position in a quiet environment for 30 minutes after
needle placement before blood flow measurements. Normal saline was
first infused for 18 minutes. Drugs were then infused in the following
sequence: 3 (low dose) and 10 (high dose) µg/min SNP (Roche) and 7.5
(low dose) and 15 (high dose) µg/min ACh (Iolab Corp). Each dose was
infused for 6 minutes, and the infusion of each drug was separated by
infusion of normal saline for 18 minutes, during which blood flow
returned to basal values. Forearm blood flow was recorded for 10
seconds at 15-second intervals during the last 3 minutes of each drug
and saline infusion period with mercury-in-rubber strain-gauge venous
occlusion plethysmography (EC 4 Strain Gauge Plethysmograph, Hokanson),
which was connected to a rapid cuff inflator (E 20, Hokanson), an
analog-to-digital converter (McLab/4e, AD Instruments Pty Ltd),
and a personal computer, as previously described.26 Blood
flow measurements were performed simultaneously in the
infused (experimental) and control arm. Means of the final 5
measurements of each recording period were used for
analysis. Metformin was discontinued for 2 days before the
endothelial function studies to avoid any acute effects
on vascular function.
Other Measurements
Plasma glucose concentrations were measured in duplicate by the
glucose oxidase method27 with the use of a Beckman Glucose
Analyzer II (Beckman Instruments). HbA1c
was measured by high-performance liquid
chromatography with the use of a fully automated
Glycosylated Hemoglobin Analyzer System (Bio-Rad). Serum free
insulin concentrations were determined by double-antibody
radioimmunoassay (Pharmacia Insulin RIA kit) after precipitation with
polyethylene glycol.28 Urine albumin was measured
by an immunoturbidimetric (Hitachi Ltd) method with the use of an
antiserum against human albumin (Orion
Diagnostica). Microalbuminuria was defined as
an albumin excretion rate of 20 to 200 µg/min. FFA, serum
total cholesterol, and
triglycerides29 along with HDL
cholesterol30 were measured as previously
described. Whole-body fat and fat-free mass were measured by a single
frequency bioelectric impedance device (model BIA-101A,
Bio-Electrical Impedance Analyzer System, RJL
Systems).31
Statistical Analysis
Data between the type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects
were compared by the Student unpaired t test. Changes
induced by insulin therapy in endothelial function were
calculated by ANOVA for repeated measures because treatment groups were
composed of the same subjects, as described by
Ludbrook.32 Horizontal contrasts were thereafter
calculated by the paired t test with the Bonferroni
correction. Correlation analyses were performed by the Spearman
nonparametric correlation coefficient. All calculations
were made with the use of the Systat statistical package. All
probability values are 2-tailed. A value of P<0.05 was
considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as
mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Basal blood flow in the experimental arm was comparable before (2.2±0.2 mL · dL-1 · min-1) and after (2.1±0.2 mL · dL-1 · min-1) insulin therapy and was not different from that in the normal subjects (2.2±0.2 mL · dL-1 · min-1). Blood flows in the control arm were similar to those in the experimental arm basally in patients with type 2 diabetes (2.1±0.2 and 2.0±0.1 mL · dL-1 · min-1) and normal subjects (2.0±0.2 mL · dL-1 · min-1, P=NS) throughout the study.
Endothelial Function
Before insulin therapy, blood flow during infusion of the low
(6.7±0.6 versus 9.3±0.8 mL · dL-1
· min-1, P<0.05) and high
(7.5±0.7 versus 11.6±0.9 mL · dL-1
· min-1, P<0.01) doses of ACh was
significantly blunted in the type 2 diabetic patients compared with the
normal subjects. During insulin therapy, the blood flow response to the
low dose of ACh did not increase significantly, whereas that to the
high dose of ACh increased by 44% (7.5±0.7 versus 10.8±1.6 mL
· dL-1 · min-1,
before versus after; P<0.05). The responses to ACh were not
different from those of the normal subjects (Figure
).
Forearm blood flow responses to both the low (7.8±0.4 versus 9.1±0.4
mL · dL-1 ·
min-1, P<0.05) and high (11.0±0.8
versus 13.0±0.7 mL · dL-1 ·
min-1, P<0.05) doses of SNP also
increased significantly during insulin therapy. Blood flows during SNP
infusion were not significantly different from those in normal subjects
(Figure
).
|
To determine the possible causes of enhanced
endothelial functions during insulin therapy, simple
correlation coefficients (Spearman) were calculated between changes in
metabolic parameters and those of
endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilatation.
No significant correlations were observed between metabolic
parameters, which changed significantly during insulin
therapy (HbA1C, fasting plasma glucose, serum
FFAs, serum triglycerides, and serum free insulin
concentrations), and the absolute or relative change in blood flow
during SNP and ACh infusions (Table 2
).
|
In the type 2 diabetic patients, who were studied twice during metformin therapy, basal flows were comparable (2.2±0.2 and 2.5±0.3 mL · dL-1 · min-1, P=NS). Blood flow responses to the low (8.4±1.2 and 7.7±0.3 mL · dL-1 · min-1, P=NS) and high (10.8±2.0 and 10.5±2.7 mL · dL-1 · min-1, P=NS) doses of SNP also remained unchanged, as did the responses to the low (7.2±1.0 and 7.3±1.1 mL · dL-1 · min-1, P=NS) and high (8.9±1.4 and 9.1±1.0 mL · dL-1 · min-1, P=NS) doses of ACh. The coefficients of variation for the 2 repeated measurements in these patients were 10±1%, 14±3%, 13±4%, 10±2%, and 15±4% for infusion of saline, low-dose SNP, high-dose SNP, low-dose ACh, and high-dose ACh.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We chose to use combination therapy, with bedtime human isophane and metformin as the insulin treatment regimen. This regimen improves glycemic control without inducing weight gain.25 Lack of weight gain may be beneficial during insulin therapy, because weight gain is associated with increases in blood pressure and LDL cholesterol.29 In the UKPDS, patients treated with metformin gained less weight than did those treated with other agents,2 and the UKPDS also suggested that metformin might be cardioprotective in overweight patients. So far, however, it is unknown whether the decrease in cardiovascular events in the metformin-treated patients was due to differences in weight gain between the various treatment regimens. In the present study, endothelial function remained unchanged when measured twice in patients on chronic metformin therapy. Because the patients had already been treated for over a year with metformin before the first endothelial function test, these data do not exclude potential beneficial effects of metformin on endothelial function.
In all previous studies, except that of Avogaro et al,13 addressing endothelial function in type 2 diabetic patients by using either the invasive technique used in the present study8 10 11 12 or noninvasive measurement of the brachial artery diameter,9 endothelium-dependent vasodilatation has been impaired. This defect was also identified in the present study. The reason for normal endothelial function in the study of Avogaro et al is unclear but could be due to the small number of subjects studied (6 normal subjects and 10 patients with type 2 diabetes). Regarding endothelium-independent but guanylate cyclasedependent vasodilatation, endothelial function has been found to be either impaired8 11 12 or normal.9 13
Multiple causes could contribute to endothelial
dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with nondiabetic
subjects matched for age, body weight, LDL cholesterol
levels, and blood pressure, as in the present study (Table 1
). Such factors could include those known to be associated with
increased cardiovascular risk, such as chronic
hyperglycemia,23 hyperinsulinemia
independent of insulin resistance,33 insulin resistance,
and its consequences (hypertriglyceridemia,
increased concentrations of small dense LDL particles, low HDL
cholesterol, and increases in FFA concentrations). Data on
possible causes of endothelial dysfunction are sparse
in previous cross-sectional studies addressing
endothelial function in type 2 diabetic patients. We
recently performed a comprehensive search for such factors and found
LDL size to be weakly correlated with
endothelium-dependent vasodilatation.34 A
similar relation was also described by Watts et al11
within a group of type 2 diabetic patients. In other
studies,8 12 13 no significant correlations between
cardiovascular risk factors and
endothelium-dependent vasodilatation have been
identified.
Insulin therapy induces several changes that potentially could enhance endothelial function. Such changes include decreases in serum triglyceride,18 35 36 FFA,17 18 21 and glucose37 concentrations, and all these parameters have been associated with endothelial function.21 35 Acute increases in insulin concentrations also enhance ACh-induced vasodilatation.24 In the present study, changes in none of these parameters during insulin therapy were significantly associated with enhanced endothelial function. Whether this reflects lack of a dominant effect of a single metabolic parameter or an effect of some factor not quantified in the present study, such as growth and hemostatic factors and LDL size, remains unclear.
Endothelium-independent vasodilatation, ie, vascular smooth muscle celldependent vasodilatation, also increased significantly during insulin therapy. Multiple factors, which could be either direct or indirect consequences of insulin therapy, could underlie the enhanced vascular smooth muscledependent vasodilatation. Regarding direct effects of insulin, insulin attenuates vascular contraction by inhibiting voltage-dependent calcium channels38 via a mechanism that appears coupled to the ability of insulin to increase glucose transport in vascular smooth muscle cells.39 The ability of insulin to attenuate angiotensin IImediated calcium transients is blunted in cultured unpassaged vascular smooth muscle cells in insulin-resistant spontaneously hypertensive rats.40 Insulin therapy increases in vivo insulin sensitivity of glucose uptake in type 2 diabetic patients.17 41 42 43 If this would also happen in vascular smooth muscle, it might provide one mechanism to explain enhanced vascular smooth muscle celldependent vasodilatation after insulin therapy. Other possible mechanisms include increased bioavailability of exogenous (and endogenous) nitrates due to decreases in oxidative stress,44 45 advanced glycosylation end products,46 small dense LDL particles,22 36 and the susceptibility of circulating LDL to oxidation.47 Serum FFAs have also been suggested to enhance endothelium-dependent,21 and possibly endothelium-independent,35 vasodilatation. FFAs are of interest because of the exquisite sensitivity of lipolysis to insulin.17 48
To conclude, endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilatation improves during insulin therapy. Both improvements can be considered potentially antiatherogenic and support the view that insulin therapy, either via direct or indirect mechanisms, has beneficial rather than harmful effects on vascular function.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 5, 1999; accepted August 5, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Turner RC, Holman RR, Stratton IM, Cull CA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Frighi V, Wright D, Neil A, Kohner E, Mcelroy H, Fox C, Hadden D. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998;352:854865.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
McLenachan JM, Williams JK, Fish RD, Ganz P, Selwyn
AP. Loss of flow-mediated endothelium-dependent
dilatation occurs early in the development of
atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1991;84:12731278.
4. Siegel G, Ruckborn K, Schnalke F, Muller J. Endothelial dysfunction in human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:99103.
5. Chowienczyk PJ, Watts GF, Cockcroft JR, Ritter JM. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemia. Lancet. 1992;340:14301432.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Brush JE, Epstein SE. Abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:2227.[Abstract]
7.
Cockcroft JR, Chowienczyk PJ, Benjamin N, Ritter JM.
Preserved endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in
patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J
Med. 1994;330:10361040.
8. McVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Johnston GD, McDermott BJ, McGrath LT, Henry WR, Andrews JW, Hayes JR. Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilatation in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1992;35:771776.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Goodfellow J, Ramsey MW, Luddington LA, Jones CJH,
Coates PA, Dunstan F, Lewis MJ, Owens DR, Henderson AH.
Endothelium and inelastic arteries: an early marker of
vascular dysfunction in non-insulin dependent diabetes. BMJ. 1996;312:744745.
10. Ting HH, Timimi K, Boles K, Creager SJ, Ganz P, Creager MA. Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Watts GF, OBrien SF, Silvester W, Millar JA. Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent dilatation of forearm resistance arteries in men with diet-treated non-insulin-dependent diabetes: role of dyslipidaemia. Clin Sci. 1996;91:567573.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Williams SB, Cusco JA, Roddy M-A, Johnstone MT, Creager MA. Impaired nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:567574.[Abstract]
13. Avogaro A, Piarulli F, Valerio A, Miola M, Calveri M, Pavan P, Vicini P, Cobelli C, Tiengo A, Calo L, Del Prato S. Forearm nitric oxide balance, vascular relaxation, and glucose metabolism in NIDDM patients. Diabetes. 1997;46:10401046.[Abstract]
14. Anderson TJ, Meredith IT, Ganz P, Selwyn AP, Yeung AC. Nitric oxide and nitrovasodilators: similarities, differences and potential interactions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:555566.[Abstract]
15. Tesfamariam B, Brown ML, Deykin D, Cohen RA. Elevated glucose promotes generation of endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor prostanoids in rabbit aorta. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:929932.
16. Tesfamariam B, Brown ML, Cohen RA. Elevated glucose impairs endothelium-dependent relaxation by activating protein kinase C. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:16431648.
17. Taskinen M-R, Sane T, Helve E, Karonen S-L, Nikkilä EA, Yki-Järvinen H. Bedtime insulin for suppression of overnight fatty-free acid, blood glucose, and glucose production in NIDDM. Diabetes. 1989;38:580588.[Abstract]
18.
Taskinen M-R, Kuusi T, Helve E, Nikkilä E,
Yki-Järvinen H. Insulin therapy induces antiatherogenic changes
of serum lipoproteins in noninsulin-dependent diabetes.
Arteriosclerosis. 1988;8:168177.
19.
Chen Y-D, Golay A, Swislocki ALM, Reaven GM. Resistance
to insulin suppression of plasma free fatty acid concentrations and
insulin stimulation of glucose uptake in noninsulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;64:1721.
20. Groop L, Bonadonna R, Ratheiser K, Zych K. Suppression of FFA turnover (TR) and FFA oxidation (OX) by insulin (I) is impaired in NIDDM. Diabetes. 1986;35:89A. Abstract.
21. Steinberg HO, Tarshoby M, Monestel R, Hook G, Cronin J, Johnson A, Bayazeed B, Baron AD. Elevated circulating free fatty acid levels impair endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:12301239.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Feingold KR, Grunfeld C, Pang M, Doerrler W, Krauss RM.
LDL subclass phenotypes and triglyceride
metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes.
Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:14961502.
23.
Laakso M, Lehto S, Penttilä I,
Pyörälä K. Lipids and lipoproteins predicting
coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity in patients with
non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Circulation. 1993;88:14211430.
24.
Taddei S, Virdis A, Mattei P, Natali A, Ferrannini E,
Salvetti A. Effect of insulin on acetylcholine-induced vasodilatation
in normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension.
Circulation. 1995;92:29112918.
25.
Yki-Järvinen H, Ryysy L, Nikkilä K, Tulokas
T, Vanamo R, Heikkilä M. Comparison of bedtime insulin regimens
in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:389441.
26.
Mäkimattila S, Virkamäki A, Groop P-H,
Cockcroft J, Utriainen T, Fagerudd J, Yki-Järvinen H. Chronic
hyperglycemia impairs endothelial function and insulin
sensitivity via different mechanisms in insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus. Circulation. 1996;94:12761282.
27. Kadish AH, Little RL, Sternberg JC. A new and rapid method for the determination of glucose by measurement of rate of oxygen consumption. Clin Chem. 1968;14:116131.[Abstract]
28.
Desbuquois B, Aurbach GD. Use of polyethylene glycol to
separate free and antibody-bound peptide hormones in radioimmunoassay.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1971;33:732738.
29.
Yki-Järvinen H, Ryysy L, Kauppila M, Kujansuu E,
Lahti J, Marjanen T, Niskanen L, Rajala S, Salo S, Seppälä
P, Tulokas T, Viikari J, Taskinen M-R. Effect of obesity on the
response to insulin therapy in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:40374043.
30. Gidez LJ, Miller GJ, Burstein M, Eder HA. Analysis of plasma high density lipoprotein subclasses by a precipitation procedure: correlation with preparative and analytical ultracentrifugation. In Lippel K, ed. Report of the High Density Lipoprotein Methodology Workshop. Bethesda, Md: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health; 1998:328340. NIH publication No. 79661.
31.
Lukaski HC, Johnson PE, Bolonchuk WW, Lykken GI.
Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements
of the human body. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;41:810817.
32.
Ludbrook J. Repeated measurements and multiple
comparisons in cardiovascular research.
Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:303311.
33.
Ruige JB, Assendelft WJ, Dekker JM, Kostense PJ, Heine
RJ, Bouter LM. Insulin and risk of cardiovascular
disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 1998;97:9961001.
34. Mäkimattila S, Ming-lin L, Vakkilainen J, Schlenzka A, Lahdenperä S, Syvänne M, Mäntysaari M, Summanen P, Bergholm R, Taskinen M-R, Yki-Järvinen H. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in NIDDM: relation to LDL size, oxidized LDL and antioxidants. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:973981.[Abstract]
35.
Lundman P, Eriksson M, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Karpe F,
Tornvall P. Transient triglyceridemia decreases vascular
reactivity in young, healthy men without risk factors for
coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1997;96:32663268.
36. Caixas A, Ordonez-Llanos J, de Leiva A, Payes A, Homs R, Perez A. Optimization of glycemic control by insulin therapy decreases the proportion of small dense LDL particles in diabetic patients. Diabetes. 1997;46:12071213.[Abstract]
37.
Williams SB, Goldfine AB, Timimi FK, Ting HK, Roddy
M-A, Simonson DC, Creager MA. Acute hyperglycemia attenuates
endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in humans in vivo.
Circulation. 1998;97:16951701.
38.
Kahn AM, Seidel CL, Allen JC, ONeil RG, Shelat H,
Song T. Insulin reduces contraction and intracellular calcium
concentration in vascular smooth muscle. Hypertension. 1993;22:735742.
39.
Kahn AM, Lichtenberg RA, Allen JC, Seidel CL, Song T.
Insulin-stimulated glucose transport inhibits
Ca2+ influx and contraction in vascular smooth
muscle. Circulation. 1995;92:15971603.
40. Touyz RM, Tolloczko B, Schiffrin EL. Insulin attenuates agonist-evoked calcium transients in vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1994;23:I-25I-28.
41. Scarlett JA, Gray RS, Griffin J, Olefsky JM, Kolterman OG. Insulin treatment reverses the insulin resistance of type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1982;5:353363.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Foley JE, Kashiwagi A, Verso MA, Reaven GM, Andrews JW. Improvement in in vitro insulin action after one month of insulin therapy in obese non-insulin-dependent diabetics. J Clin Invest. 1983;72:19011909.
43. Andrews WJ, Vasquez B, Nagulesparan M, Klimes I, Foley JE, Unger R, Reaven GM. Insulin therapy in obese, non-insulin-dependent diabetes induces improvements in insulin action and secretion that are maintained for two weeks after insulin withdrawal. Diabetes. 1984;33:634642.[Abstract]
44.
Tesfamariam B, Cohen RA. Free radicals mediate
endothelial cell dysfunction caused by elevated
glucose. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H321H326.
45.
Hattori Y, Kawasaki H, Abe K, Kanno M. Superoxide
dismutase recovers altered endothelium-dependent
relaxation in diabetic rat aorta. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:H1086H1094.
46. Bucala R, Tracey KJ, Cerami A. Advanced glycosylation products quench nitric oxide and mediate defective endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in experimental diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:432438.
47. Rabini RA, Fumelli P, Galassi R, Dousset N, Taus M, Ferretti G, Mazzanti L, Curatola G, Solera ML, Valdiguie P. Increased susceptibility to lipid oxidation of low-density lipoproteins and erythrocyte membranes from diabetic patients. Metabolism. 1994;43:14701474.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Nurjhan N, Campbell PJ, Kennedy FP, Miles JM, Gerich JE. Insulin dose-response characteristics for suppression of glycerol release and conversion to glucose in humans. Diabetes. 1986;35:13261331.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dickinson, D. P Hancock, P. Petocz, A. Ceriello, and J. Brand-Miller High-glycemic index carbohydrate increases nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation in mononuclear cells of young, lean healthy subjects Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1188 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chamberlain Anyone Have a Pen? DOC News, September 1, 2007; 4(9): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. J Hamilton, G. T Chew, and G. F Watts Therapeutic regulation of endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 89 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gkaliagkousi, A. Shah, and A. Ferro Review: Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of endothelial dysfunction: relevance to diabetes The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, January 1, 2007; 7(1): 5 - 10. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Hermann, W. Li, H. Dominguez, N. Ihlemann, C. Rask-Madsen, A. Major-Pedersen, D. B. Nielsen, K. W. Hansen, M. Hawkins, L. Kober, et al. Quinapril Treatment Increases Insulin-Stimulated Endothelial Function and Adiponectin Gene Expression in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 1001 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Jadhav, J Petrie, W Ferrell, S Cobbe, and N Sattar Insulin resistance as a contributor to myocardial ischaemia independent of obstructive coronary atheroma: a role for insulin sensitisation? Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1379 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Kernohan, A. Spiers, N. Sattar, C. Hillier, S. J Cleland, M. Small, M.-A. Lumsden, J. M. Connell, and J. R Petrie Effects of low-dose continuous combined HRT on vascular function in women with type 2 diabetes Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, October 1, 2004; 1(2): 82 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Wheatcroft, A. M. Shah, J.-M. Li, E. Duncan, B. T. Noronha, P. A. Crossey, and M. T. Kearney Preserved Glucoregulation but Attenuation of the Vascular Actions of Insulin in Mice Heterozygous for Knockout of the Insulin Receptor Diabetes, October 1, 2004; 53(10): 2645 - 2652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Natali, S. Baldeweg, E. Toschi, B. Capaldo, D. Barbaro, A. Gastaldelli, J. S. Yudkin, and E. Ferrannini Vascular Effects of Improving Metabolic Control With Metformin or Rosiglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, June 1, 2004; 27(6): 1349 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Clement, S. S. Braithwaite, M. F. Magee, A. Ahmann, E. P. Smith, R. G. Schafer, and I. B. Hirsch Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in Hospitals Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 553 - 591. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Westerbacka, R. Bergholm, M. Tiikkainen, and H. Yki-Jarvinen Glargine and Regular Human Insulin Similarly Acutely Enhance Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation in Normal Subjects Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(2): 320 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vehkavaara and H. Yki-Jarvinen 3.5 Years of Insulin Therapy With Insulin Glargine Improves In Vivo Endothelial Function in Type 2 Diabetes Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(2): 325 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Li, T. Sawamura, and G. Renier Glucose Enhances Endothelial LOX-1 Expression: Role for LOX-1 in Glucose-Induced Human Monocyte Adhesion to Endothelium Diabetes, July 1, 2003; 52(7): 1843 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Fernandez-Real, G. Penarroja, A. Castro, F. Garcia-Bragado, A. Lopez-Bermejo, and W. Ricart Blood Letting in High-Ferritin Type 2 Diabetes: Effects on vascular reactivity Diabetes Care, December 1, 2002; 25(12): 2249 - 2255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hallsten, K. A. Virtanen, F. Lonnqvist, H. Sipila, A. Oksanen, T. Viljanen, T. Ronnemaa, J. Viikari, J. Knuuti, and P. Nuutila Rosiglitazone but Not Metformin Enhances Insulin- and Exercise-Stimulated Skeletal Muscle Glucose Uptake in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes, December 1, 2002; 51(12): 3479 - 3485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ryden and K. Malmberg Who are the enemies? Diabetes mellitus -- a major risk factor for ischaemic myocardial injury: new directions in the management of acute coronary syndromes in the diabetic patient Eur. Heart J. Suppl., November 1, 2002; 4(suppl_G): G21 - G25. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. V. van Venrooij, M. A. van de Ree, M. L. Bots, R. P. Stolk, M. V. Huisman, and J. D. Banga Aggressive Lipid Lowering Does Not Improve Endothelial Function in Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Atorvastatin Lipid Intervention (DALI) Study: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Diabetes Care, July 1, 2002; 25(7): 1211 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. van Etten, E. J.P. de Koning, M. L. Honing, E. S. Stroes, C. A. Gaillard, and T. J. Rabelink Intensive Lipid Lowering by Statin Therapy Does Not Improve Vasoreactivity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2002; 22(5): 799 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rask-Madsen, N. Ihlemann, T. Krarup, E. Christiansen, L. Kober, C. Nervil Kistorp, and C. Torp-Pedersen Insulin Therapy Improves Insulin-Stimulated Endothelial Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Ischemic Heart Disease Diabetes, November 1, 2001; 50(11): 2611 - 2618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M Storey, C. J Perry, and J. R Petrie Review: Endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, August 1, 2001; 1(1): 22 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dandona, A. Aljada, P. Mohanty, H. Ghanim, W. Hamouda, E. Assian, and S. Ahmad Insulin Inhibits Intranuclear Nuclear Factor {{kappa}}B and Stimulates I{{kappa}}B in Mononuclear Cells in Obese Subjects: Evidence for an Anti-inflammatory Effect? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2001; 86(7): 3257 - 3265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |