Vascular Biology |
From the Department of Pharmacology (S.K., Y.Z., Y.I., H.Y., H.I.), Osaka City University Medical School, Osaka, Japan, and the Environmental Biological Life Science Research Center, Inc (M.Y.), Shiga, Japan.
Correspondence to Shokei Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Pharmacology, Osaka City University Medical School, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan. E mail kims@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: angiotensin vascular remodeling platelet-derived growth factor hypertension tyrosine phosphorylation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), particularly
PDGF-BB, potently stimulates either VSMC proliferation or
migration8 9 10 11
and is the major growth factor involved in various vascular diseases,
such as atherosclerosis and neointimal
hyperplasia.11 12 13 14 15
It is well known that PDGF, like many other growth factors, initially
activates the intrinsic receptor tyrosine kinase on binding to
the receptors (PDGF
- and ß-receptors), resulting in tyrosyl
phosphorylation of the receptors themselves and
cellular substrate proteins for receptor
kinases.14 Thus, tyrosyl
phosphorylation of the PDGF
- or ß-receptor is the
essential first step leading to the biological action of PDGF, thereby
being regarded as a useful parameter to estimate the
functional activity of PDGF. Interestingly, an in vitro report has
shown that Ang II induced tyrosyl phosphorylation of
the PDGF ß-receptor in cultured rat VSMCs in a direct
manner.16 On the other hand,
a more recent report indicated that Ang II induced tyrosyl
phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor (EGF)
receptor but not the PDGF receptor in cultured rat
VSMCs.17 18 Thus,
controversial evidence exists with respect to the activation of PDGF
and EGF receptors by Ang II in vitro. However, the role of Ang II in
these receptor activations in vivo is poorly understood.
In the present study, to examine the contribution of PDGF and EGF receptor activation in hypertensive vascular remodeling, we determined tyrosyl phosphorylation of these receptors in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP), the popular and useful model for investigation of the mechanism of not only hypertension but also vascular remodeling.19 We also examined the role of ACE and Ang II in these receptor activations. We obtained the evidence that the PDGF ß-receptor is chronically activated in the vascular tissue of hypertensive rats and that this receptor activation is mainly due to ACE-mediated Ang II.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of ACE Inhibitors and
Hydralazine on Aortic Growth Factor Receptors
All procedures were in accordance with institutional
guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Thirteen-week-old SHRSP were orally given perindopril (2 or 4 mg/kg),
enalapril (10 mg/kg), hydralazine (
30 mg/kg), or vehicle
(0.5% carboxymethylcellulose solution) for 4 weeks (from 13 to 17
weeks of age). Except for hydralazine, all drugs were given to
SHRSP by gastric gavage once a day. Hydralazine was dissolved
in distilled water and given to rats as drinking water for the same
period. Furthermore, in an another group, to investigate the possible
contribution of bradykinin to the effects of perindopril, SHRSP were
not only given perindopril orally (4 mg/kg per day) but were also
subcutaneously infused the bradykinin B2 receptor
antagonist Hoe 140 at a dose of 300 µg/kg per day via
osmotic minipump (Alza Corp). After 1 and 4 weeks of drug treatment,
the systolic blood pressure of conscious rats was measured by
the tail-cuff method at 3 or 24 hours after oral dosing. After the
treatment, rats were decapitated, and the thoracic aorta was
immediately excised, carefully dissected from adherent fat and
connective tissues, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C
until use.
An expanded Methods section is available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Receptors, PDGF ß-Receptors, and EGF Receptors in
SHRSP
- or ß-receptors or EGF receptors was similar to that in
age-matched WKY. On the other hand, tyrosine
phosphorylation of aortic PDGF ß-receptors in 10- and
20-week-old SHRSP was 1.6-fold
(P<0.01) and 2.0-fold
(P<0.01), respectively,
greater than that in age-matched WKY. There was no significant
difference in aortic PDGF
-receptor or EGF receptor tyrosine
phosphorylation between WKY and SHRSP at any age
examined. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in aortic
PDGF
- or ß-receptor or EGF receptor protein levels between WKY
and SHRSP at any age examined.
|
We also compared aortic PDGF ß-receptor tyrosine phosphorylation between 20-week-old WKY and SHRSP after endothelial removal. After endothelial denudation, aortic PDGF ß-receptor tyrosine phosphorylation in SHRSP (n=5) was 2.3-fold larger (P<0.01) than that in WKY (n=5), whereas there was no difference in aortic PDGF ß-receptor protein levels between these groups.
Effects of ACE Inhibitors and
Hydralazine on Blood Pressure of SHRSP
As shown in
Figure 2
, at 1 and 4 weeks after the start of drug
treatment, blood pressure of SHRSP was measured at 3 and 24 hours after
oral dosing of each drug (except for hydralazine). After either
1 or 4 weeks, at 3 hours after oral dosing, perindopril lowered the
blood pressure of SHRSP in a dose-dependent fashion, and 4 mg/kg
perindopril and 10 mg/kg enalapril had a comparable hypotensive effect.
On the other hand, after either 1 or 4 weeks, at 24 hours after oral
dosing, the blood pressure of 4 mg/kg perindopriltreated SHRSP was
significantly lower than that of 10 mg/kg enalapriltreated SHRSP. The
blood pressure of SHRSP treated with hydralazine as drinking
water was similar or lower than that of 4 mg/kg perindopriltreated
SHRSP at all time points examined.
|
Hoe 140 treatment did not apparently affect the hypotensive effects of perindopril (4 mg/kg per day) at 3 or 24 hours after oral dosing after 1 or 4 weeks of drug treatment.
Effects of ACE Inhibitors and
Hydralazine on Aortic ACE Activity of SHRSP
Figure 3
indicates serum and aortic ACE activity of SHRSP
after 4 weeks of drug treatment. Serum ACE activity of SHRSP treated
with 2 mg/kg perindopril, 4 mg/kg perindopril, and enalapril was much
lower than that of vehicle-treated SHRSP, and there was no significant
difference in serum ACE activity among all ACE
inhibitortreated groups.
|
Aortic ACE activity of SHRSP treated with 2 mg/kg perindopril, 4 mg/kg perindopril, and enalapril (8.26±0.41, 4.23±0.26, and 8.85 nmol · min-1 · mg protein-1, respectively) was lower than that of vehicle-treated SHRSP (32.1±1.4 nmol · min-1 · mg protein-1). Perindopril at 4 mg/kg reduced aortic ACE activity to a greater extent than did perindopril at 2 mg/kg and enalapril (P<0.05).
Hydralazine did not significantly affect serum or aortic ACE activity of SHRSP. Hoe 140 treatment did not apparently affect serum and aortic ACE activity of perindopril-treated SHRSP.
Effects of ACE Inhibitors and
Hydralazine on Aortic PDGF ß-Receptors of SHRSP
As shown in
Figure 4
, either perindopril or enalapril reduced tyrosine
phosphorylation of aortic PDGF ß-receptors in SHRSP,
and perindopril at 4 mg/kg decreased aortic PDGF ß-receptor tyrosine
phosphorylation to a larger extent than did enalapril
(P<0.05). On the other hand,
hydralazine treatment failed to reduce aortic PDGF ß-receptor
phosphorylation of SHRSP. Hoe 140 treatment did not
apparently affect the reduction of aortic PDGF ß-receptor tyrosine
phosphorylation of SHRSP by
perindopril.
|
Effects of ACE Inhibitors and
Hydralazine on Aortic ERK of SHRSP
As shown in
Figure 5
, either perindopril or enalapril significantly
reduced the phosphorylation of aortic extracellular
signalregulated kinase (ERK), p42ERK and p44ERK, of SHRSP, and
perindopril at 4 mg/kg decreased aortic ERK
phosphorylation to a larger extent than did enalapril
(P<0.01). On the other hand,
hydralazine treatment failed to reduce aortic ERK
phosphorylation of SHRSP. Hoe 140 treatment did not
apparently affect the reduction of aortic ERK
phosphorylation of SHRSP by
perindopril.
|
Effects of Acute Ang II Infusion on Aortic PDGF
ß-Receptors and EGF Receptors
As shown in
Figure 6
, aortic EGF receptor tyrosine
phosphorylation was increased by 3.1-fold
(P<0.01; each time point, n=5)
at 5 minutes after acute infusion of Ang II at 100
ng · kg-1 · min-1
with a 31 mm Hg rise in mean blood pressure but had already
returned to the control level at 15 minutes.
|
Unlike the EGF receptor, the aortic PDGF ß-receptor
tyrosine phosphorylation was not affected throughout 60
minutes of acute infusion of Ang II at 100
ng · kg-1 · min-1
(each time point, n=5;
Figure 6
).
Effects of Chronic Ang II Infusion on Aortic
PDGF ß-Receptors and EGF Receptors
Rats subjected to Ang II infusion (400
ng · kg-1 · min-1
SC) had significantly increased blood pressure at 3 days compared with
control rats (140±4 versus118±3 mm Hg, respectively;
P<0.01), and this increase in
blood pressure was completely blocked by treatment with CS-866 or
hydralazine. As shown in Figure I (please see online at
http://atvb.ahajournals.org), chronic Ang II infusion increased aortic
PDGF ß-receptor tyrosine phosphorylation by 1.8-,
2.7-, and 2.2-fold at 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks, respectively.
Treatment with CS-866 completely blocked Ang IIinduced PDGF
ß-receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, whereas
normalization of blood pressure by hydralazine only partially
suppressed this receptor phosphorylation. Unlike the
case of the PDGF ß-receptor, chronic Ang II infusion did not
apparently increase aortic EGF receptor tyrosine
phosphorylation throughout the infusion (data not
shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we found that the tyrosyl
phosphorylation of the aortic PDGF ß-receptor, but
not of the PDGF
-receptor or EGF receptor, was enhanced in SHRSP
with the development of hypertension, suggesting the involvement of the
PDGF ß-receptor in hypertensive vascular remodeling. This enhanced
PDGF ß-receptor phosphorylation in SHRSP seems to be
at least in part due to smooth muscle cells, because PDGF ß-receptor
tyrosyl phosphorylation of aortas subjected to
endothelial removal was greater in SHRSP than in WKY,
and smooth muscle cells are the major component of vascular tissue. To
elucidate the mechanism of this PDGF ß-receptor activation in SHRSP,
we examined the effect of ACE inhibitors and
hydralazine on aortic receptors. Of note, although
hydralazine lowered the blood pressure of SHRSP at least to a
degree comparable to that produced by ACE inhibitors
(perindopril and enalapril), hydralazine did not significantly
reduce aortic PDGF ß-receptor phosphorylation of
SHRSP, providing no evidence for the major role of hypertension in this
receptor activation. On the other hand, perindopril or enalapril
significantly decreased this receptor activation of SHRSP. These
observations provide evidence that ACE directly contributes to the
increase in aortic PDGF ß-receptor activation in SHRSP. Previously,
we have reported that aortic ERK activity is increased in aortas of
SHRSP with the development of
hypertension.29 ERK in VSMCs
is well known to be activated by Ang II, PDGF, or EGF and plays
an important role in VSMC proliferation and
migration.6 30 31
Therefore, in the present study, we also examined the effect of ACE
inhibitors on aortic ERK activity and found that the
increased aortic ERK activity in SHRSP is mediated by ACE, as shown by
the reduction of ERK activity by ACE inhibitors but not by
hydralazine. Thus, the enhanced aortic ERK activity in SHRSP
may be partially mediated by PDGF ß-receptor activation. However,
further study is needed to demonstrate our proposal.
A growing body of evidence supports the notion that vascular effects of ACE inhibitors are mediated not only by the inhibition of Ang II generation but also by the accumulation of bradykinin.32 33 34 35 Therefore, to determine which mechanism is involved in the inhibitory effects of ACE inhibitors on aortic PDGF ß-receptors and ERK, we examined the effect of Hoe 140, a specific bradykinin antagonist, and found no evidence of an important role of bradykinin in the present experimental conditions. Thus, the effects of ACE inhibitors in the present study seem to be mainly due to the suppression of Ang II generation, although the possible contribution of bradykinin cannot be completely ruled out.
In the present study, in spite of a comparable hypotensive effect between perindopril (4 mg/kg) and enalapril (10 mg/kg) at 3 hours after oral dosing, the hypotensive effect at 24 hours after oral dosing was greater in perindopril than enalapril, confirming previous findings on longer pharmacological action of perindopril than enalapril in vivo.36 Interestingly, despite no significant difference in the decrease in serum ACE activity between perindopril and enalapril, perindopril (4 mg/kg) reduced the aortic ACE activity of SHRSP more potently than did enalapril (10 mg/kg), and this greater reduction of aortic ACE activity by perindopril was associated with the larger decrease in PDGF ß-receptor phosphorylation and ERK activity. These findings suggest that vascular ACE may be implicated in aortic PDGF ß-receptor and ERK activation of SHRSP.
To our knowledge, so far, there has been no report on
vascular immunoreactive PDGF or EGF receptor protein or the tyrosyl
phosphorylation of either in a hypertensive model.
Previous reports on other hypertensive rats have been limited to
studies of mRNA
levels.37 38 It has
been reported that aortic PDGF ß-receptor mRNA is increased in
spontaneously hypertensive rats and deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt
hypertensive rats, but mRNA levels for PDGF
-receptors or PDGF A or
B chains are not increased in these hypertensive
rats.37 On the other hand,
being in disagreement with the above
findings,37 another group of
investigators reported an increased aortic PDGF A chain (but not B
chain) mRNA in spontaneously hypertensive
rats.38 However, it is well
established that the protein level is regulated not only by the
transcriptional rate but also by other mechanisms, such as the
translational rate and the degradation rate, and so the mRNA level is
not necessarily parallel with the protein level. Therefore, it is
difficult to directly compare our present study on protein level
and tyrosyl phosphorylation with previous findings on
mRNA. Abe et al,39 who also
examined immunoreactive PDGF and EGF receptor protein and their
phosphorylation as in our present work, reported
that tyrosyl phosphorylation of the PDGF receptor, but
not the EGF receptor, is chronically enhanced in the balloon-injured
rat artery, whereas PDGF or EGF receptor protein expression is not
elevated in the balloon-injured artery. Thus, our present findings
on hypertensive rats are similar to the case of the balloon-injury
model.
To further elucidate the role of Ang II in vascular growth factor activation, we examined the effects of acute and chronic Ang II infusion. The observations on acute Ang II infusion showed that Ang II transiently induced aortic tyrosyl phosphorylation of the EGF receptor but not that of the PDGF ß-receptor. Thus, our present in vivo work provided the first evidence for the in vivo acute activation of the EGF receptor by Ang II and did not support in vitro previous findings that Ang II acutely and transiently phosphorylates the PDGF ß-receptor in cultured VSMCs.16 Therefore, there may be a significant difference between the phenotype of VSMCs in vitro and in vivo, and this difference may be in part explained by the fact that the VSMC in an in vivo situation is constantly and continuously exposed to high pressure, shear stress, or a variety of vascular remodelingrelated molecules, such as vasoactive peptides, growth factors, or inflammatory cytokines, unlike VSMCs in an in vitro situation.
Unlike acute infusion, chronic Ang II infusion increased tyrosyl phosphorylation of the PDGF ß-receptor but not the EGF receptor. This PDGF ß-receptor activation by Ang II was completely suppressed by the angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist but only partially prevented by normalization of blood pressure by hydralazine, a vasodilator. Hence, Ang II in vivo activates the aortic PDGF ß-receptor not only by its hypertensive effect but also by AT1 receptor action independent of blood pressure. Partial prevention of Ang IIinduced PDGF ß-receptor activation by hydralazine suggests that no suppression of this receptor in SHRSP by hydralazine might be due to the increase in circulating Ang II, because hydralazine significantly increased plasma renin activity in SHRSP (data not shown). Sambhi et al40 reported that 4 weeks of Ang II infusion in rats increased aortic EGF receptor mRNA and aortic binding activity with 125I-labeled EGF. However, these investigators did not examine immunoreactive EGF receptor protein itself or its tyrosyl phosphorylation, which seems to account for the discrepancy between our present findings and the previous report.40 Furthermore, it is also possible that this discrepancy may be explained by the difference in the period of Ang II infusion (2 weeks in our present work versus 4 weeks in the previous work40 ).
Ang II in vivo elicits AT1 receptormediated various biological effects, such as the activation of the sympathetic nervous system or the release of adrenal steroid hormone,5 which may have significant effects on vascular tissues. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that the activation of aortic PDGF ß-receptor by Ang II infusion might be partially mediated by these indirect actions. Further study is needed to confirm that Ang II directly activates the vascular PDGF ß-receptor in vivo.
In conclusion, tyrosyl phosphorylation of the aortic PDGF ß-receptor, but not the EGF receptor, was chronically enhanced in SHRSP with the development of hypertension. This enhanced aortic PDGF ß-receptor activation of SHRSP was mediated by ACE rather than high blood pressure. Chronic PDGF ß-receptor activation seems to be implicated in Ang IIinduced vascular remodeling in vivo. Thus, the present study provides new insight into the molecular mechanism of hypertensive vascular remodeling.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 24, 2000; accepted August 24, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. K. Mehta and K. K. Griendling Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): C82 - C97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W.M. Schellings, M. Baumann, R. E.W. van Leeuwen, R. F.J.J. Duisters, S. H.P. Janssen, B. Schroen, C. J. Peutz-Kootstra, S. Heymans, and Y. M. Pinto Imatinib Attenuates End-Organ Damage in Hypertensive Homozygous TGR(mRen2)27 Rats Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 467 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Suzuki and S. Eguchi Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation in Mediating End Organ Damage by Angiotensin II Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 339 - 340. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wang, J. Zhang, G. Spinetti, L.-Q. Jiang, R. Monticone, D. Zhao, L. Cheng, M. Krawczyk, M. Talan, G. Pintus, et al. Angiotensin II Activates Matrix Metalloproteinase Type II and Mimics Age-Associated Carotid Arterial Remodeling in Young Rats Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2005; 167(5): 1429 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Kelly, A. J. Cox, R. M. Gow, Y. Zhang, B. E. Kemp, and R. E. Gilbert Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation Mediates the Trophic Effects of Angiotensin II In Vivo Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 195 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zahradka, B. Litchie, B. Storie, and G. Helwer Transactivation of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Receptor by Angiotensin II Mediates Downstream Signaling from the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor to Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2978 - 2987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. E.G. Eskildsen-Helmond and M. J. Mulvany Pressure-Induced Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 in Small Arteries Hypertension, April 1, 2003; 41(4): 891 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kagiyama, K. Qian, T. Kagiyama, and M. I. Phillips Antisense to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Prevents the Development of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 824 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim, Y. Izumi, Y. Izumiya, Y. Zhan, M. Taniguchi, and H. Iwao Beneficial Effects of Combined Blockade of ACE and AT1 Receptor on Intimal Hyperplasia in Balloon-Injured Rat Artery Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2002; 22(8): 1299 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Voisin, S. Foisy, E. Giasson, C. Lambert, P. Moreau, and S. Meloche EGF receptor transactivation is obligatory for protein synthesis stimulation by G protein-coupled receptors Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): C446 - C455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Nadal, G. M. Scicli, L. A. Carbini, and A. G. Scicli Angiotensin II stimulates migration of retinal microvascular pericytes: involvement of TGF-beta and PDGF-BB Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H739 - H748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhan, S. Kim, H. Yasumoto, M. Namba, H. Miyazaki, and H. Iwao Effects of Dominant-Negative c-Jun on Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Induced Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2002; 22(1): 82 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |