Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Institut de Recerca (C.d.C., R.R., L.C., L.V.) and Servei de Bioquímica (J.L.S-Q, S.B., J.O-Ll.), Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Departament de Bioquímica i Biología Molecular (S.B., J.O.-Ll.), Universitat Autònoma, Barcelona, Spain.
Correspondence to Conxita de Castellarnau, Rosellon 12, 4°1a Esc A, 08029 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail ccastellarnauc{at}medynet.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: LDL electronegative LDL interleukin-8 monocyte chemotactic protein endothelial cells
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the pivotal role of oxLDL in the development of
atherosclerosis, the existence in blood of significant
amounts of modified forms of LDL with atherogenic properties is a
matter of controversy. In the past few years, a minor electronegative
subfraction of LDL has been isolated from human plasma by
anion-exchange chromatography.15 This
subfraction is found in a concentration great enough to play a
significant role in the pathogenesis of
atherosclerosis. It has been suggested that
electronegative LDL [LDL(-)] was the result of peroxidative
processes, because these particles had a higher content of
lipoperoxides and cholesterol oxides and a lower content of
-tocopherol than native LDL.15 16 17 18 19 However,
the oxidative nature of LDL(-) has been questioned by other authors,
because they found no lipid oxidation markers.20 21 22 23
Enhanced contents in triglyceride, sialic acid, and
apoproteins (apo) E and apoC-III have been reported to be the
main determinants for the negative charge of LDL(-).21 22
Controversy also exists regarding its interaction with LDL receptors,
with findings indicating lower,16 similar,20
or higher21 affinity to the LDL receptor. Nevertheless,
all authors agree that these particles are cytotoxic on
ECs,17 21 suggesting that LDL(-) could affect EC function
and be atherogenic. A relevant role in atherogenesis for this fraction
is supported by the observation that the relative proportion of LDL(-)
is elevated in subjects at high risk of
atherosclerosis, such as familial
hypercholesterolemic and type I diabetic
patients.24 25 In addition, a positive association between
serum cholesterol levels and LDL(-) has been
reported.21 26 The role of LDL(-) in
endothelial function remains unknown. Given the
importance of elevated MCP-1 and IL-8 levels in the recruitment,
extravasation, and migration of leukocytes toward the inflammatory loci
and the role of PAI-1 as a local regulator of
fibrinolysis, the present study examined the effect
of LDL(-) isolated from normolipemic subjects in the release of these
molecules from cultured human vascular ECs. In addition, the
implication of oxidative processes was also studied by the use of the
free radical scavenger butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), the platelet
activating factor (PAF) antagonist BN-50730, and the
glutathione donor N-acetyl cysteine (NAC).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of LDL(-) by Anion-Exchange Chromatography
LDL(-) was isolated by anion exchange
chromatography as described,23 25 with
modifications. A preparative Q-Sepharose High Performance
35/100-mm column was adapted to a fast protein liquid
chromatography (FPLC) system (Amersham Pharmacia). The
counterion was introduced by washing of the column with 300 mL of
elution buffer B (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 1 mol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L
EDTA, pH 7.4) and then equilibration with 300 mL of buffer A (10
mmol/L Tris-HCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 7.4). LDL was dialyzed against
buffer A, its content on apoB was quantified, and 20 to 30 mg of
apoB-LDL was injected into the column. The chromatographic
procedure was a multistep gradient at a flow rate of 4 mL/min, as
follows: 0 to 100 mL: 0% buffer B; 100 to 200 mL continuous gradient:
0 to 10% buffer B; 200 to 400 mL: 22% buffer B; 400 to 600 mL: 50%
buffer B; 600 to 800 mL: 100% buffer B. Two LDL subfractions, native
LDL [LDL(+)] and LDL(-), were identified at 280 nm and quantified by
peak area integration and by measurement of their
cholesterol and apoB contents. Fractions were concentrated
by ultracentrifugation. A
representative chromatogram is shown in Figure 1
.
|
Physicochemical Characterization of LDL(+) and LDL(-)
Subfractions
LDL(+) and LDL(-) fractions, and oxLDL when required, were
characterized as follows.
Lipid and apoprotein composition: The composition was evaluated in LDL dialyzed against buffer A by gel filtration chromatography (PD-10 G-25 mol/L, Amersham Pharmacia). Total and free cholesterol, triglyceride, apoB, apoA-I, Lp(a) (Roche Diagnostics), phospholipid, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs), apoE, apoC-III, and apoC-II (Wako Chemicals) contents of LDL were determined in a Hitachi 911 autoanalyzer, and the results were expressed as percentage of LDL mass or as mol/mol apoB.
Electrophoretic analysis: The motility of LDL and the integrity of apoB were determined in agarose gels (Biomidi) and SDS-PAGE 4% to 20% gradient gels (Bio-Rad), respectively.
Sialic acid content: Sialic acid was quantified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Hypersil ODS 4.6x20 5-µm column, Hewlett Packard) with fluorimetric detection, as described.28
Antioxidant content:
-Tocopherol, ß-carotene,
-carotene, and lycopene were quantified by reverse-phase HPLC
(Ultrasphere ODS 4.6x25 5-µm column, System Gold, Beckman) with a
diode-array detector (Detector168, Beckman), as
described.29 30
Thiobarbituric acidreactive substances (TBARS) and conjugated diene content: TBARS and conjugated diene contents were determined in PBS-dialyzed LDL at 0.25 g apoB/L and 0.05 g apoB/L, respectively, as described.31 32
Endothelial Cell Culture and Incubation With
LDL Subfractions
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)
were isolated and cultured as described.33 Briefly, cells
were grown in medium 199 containing 20% bovine serum, 2 mmol/L
L-glutamine, 20 mmol/L HEPES, antibiotics (Biological
Industries), 30 mg/L endothelial cell growth supplement
(ECGS), and 100 mg/L heparin (Sigma).34 Confluent first-
and second-passage cells grown in 12-well culture plates (except when
indicated) were used. Twenty-four hours before the experiment, growth
medium was removed from the wells and replaced by heparin- and
ECGS-free medium 199 with 4% inactivated human serum
(maintenance medium). Cells were then incubated at 37°C for
24 hours with or without the addition of LDL(+), LDL(-), or oxLDL at
different concentrations (0, 17.5, 35, 70, 140, and 210 mg apoB/L).
Tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
) at 20 µg/L was used as a positive
control for chemokines and PAI-1 induction.12 The
time-dependent effect of LDLs on IL-8, MCP-1, and PAI-1
production was analyzed in HUVECs incubated with 140 mg
apoB/L for 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 hours. Before cell incubation, LDLs were
dialyzed against PBS containing 1 mmol/L
CaCl2 and 0.5 mmol/L
MgCl2, pH 7.4 (PBS+). Then, apoB was measured,
filtered through 0.22-µm filters, and diluted at the indicated final
concentration with PBS+ and maintenance medium. Control
experiments in the presence of polymyxin B (50 mg/L) in the medium were
performed to exclude the possibility that trace amounts of LPS
present in LDL samples were responsible for the IL-8, MCP-1, and
PAI-1 release.
To determine whether free radicals or oxidized phospholipids were involved in IL-8 and MCP-1 production, NAC, BHT (Sigma), and the PAF antagonist BN-5073035 (kindly donated by Dr Braquet, Institut Henri Beaufour Research Laboratories, Paris, France) were used. HUVECs were preincubated for 2 hours with 10 mmol/L NAC or for 15 minutes with 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 µmol/L of BN-50730 before addition of LDL (140 mg apoB/L) and for 24 hours of incubation. BHT was preincubated for 2 hours at 40 µmol/L with LDLs before its addition to cells. BHT was also tested after being added to the cells simultaneously with LDL.
To study whether the release of chemokines was due to de novo protein synthesis, cells were incubated with LDL (70 mg apoB/L) and actinomycin D (1 mg/L) for 24 hours.
Determination of IL-8, MCP-1, and PAI-1
At the end of incubation, supernatants from each well were
collected, centrifuged to eliminate debris, and frozen at
-40°C until analysis. For PAI-1 measurements, an aliquot
containing Tween-20 (0.01% wt/vol) was collected.34 IL-8,
MCP-1 (Endogen), and PAI-1 (TintELIZE PAI-1, Biopool) released in the
media were measured by ELISA, and results were expressed as
ng/105 cells, ng/105 cells,
and µg/105 cells, respectively.
Estimation of LDL Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxicity of LDLs was examined by incubating cells in 96-
or 24-well dishes with and without LDL(+), LDL(-), or oxLDL at 140 and
210 mg apoB/L for 24 and 48 hours. The whole cytotoxic effect was
evaluated with the commercial CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Step
(Promega).36 In parallel, the percentage of living cells
after nuclei were stained with the fluorescent probe propidium
iodide was measured.37 Briefly, propidium iodide
(Molecular Probe) was added (final concentration 4 mg/L) to the media
of confluent HUVECs in 24-well plates treated with LDLs 1 hour before
the end of incubation. Fluorescence was quantified with a
Cytofluor 2350 (Millipore) fluorescence scanner (530 nm
excitation and 645 nm
emission), and results were expressed as
percentage.37 As a positive control of EC toxicity,
7ß-hydroxycholesterol (50 and 100 µmol/L) was
used.38
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SD. A Sigma Stat 2.0 statistical
package (SPSS Science) was used. Intergroup differences were performed
with nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon T
test for paired data and Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired
data). A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LDL Composition
Differences in composition between LDL(+) and LDL(-) are shown in
the Table
. Concerning lipids,
LDL(-) was significantly enriched in triglycerides
compared with LDL(+). NEFAs, apoproteins, and sialic acid content also
differed significantly between LDL(+) and LDL(-). NEFAs associated
with LDL were increased 4-fold in LDL(-) compared with LDL(+). ApoA-I
and apoC-II were not detected either in LDL(-) or in LDL(+);
nevertheless, apoE and apoC-III were 11- and 5-fold higher in LDL(-)
than in LDL(+), respectively. Sialic acid content was increased 30% in
LDL(-).
|
Antioxidant content (
-tocopherol and carotenoids) was
similar in both LDL fractions (Table
). TBARS were slightly
increased in LDL(-), although significant differences were not
obtained with respect to LDL(+). Conjugated diene content was
significantly higher in LDL(-) than in LDL(+) (Table
). These
data suggest the presence of a low amount of oxidized lipids in
LDL(-), but they indicate that this LDL subfraction was not
extensively oxidized, because higher contents of TBARS (13.8±5.7
µmol malondialdehyde/g protein) and conjugated dienes (429±139
µmol/g protein) were found in oxLDL than in either LDL subfraction
(P<0.05), and no detectable amounts of
-tocopherol or carotenoids were observed.
Electrophoretic Studies
LDL(-) had slightly higher relative motility than LDL(+)
(RF 1.1±0.1, P<0.05, n=14) but lower
than that of oxLDL (Rf 2.2±0.5, P<0.05) (Figure 1
, inset). SDS-PAGE demonstrated apoB integrity in both LDL(+) and
LDL(-), but not in oxLDL.
Effect of LDL(-) on IL-8, MCP-1, and PAI-1 Release
Treatment of HUVECs with oxLDL and LDL(-), but not with LDL(+),
resulted in a significantly increased release of IL-8 into the culture
supernatants compared with media from unstimulated HUVECs after 24
hours of treatment (Figure 2A
). This
incubation time was chosen after preliminary time-course experiments in
which the chemokine release was detectable after 4 hours of incubation,
increased up to 6 to 8 hours, and remained at a high level for 24 hours
(data not shown). MCP-1 and PAI-1 were also measured at 24 hours of
incubation. The LDL(-)-induced release of IL-8 was
concentration-dependent. Differences versus untreated or LDL(+)-treated
cells reached significance at 35 to 210 mg apoB/L for LDL(-) and at 70
to 210 mg apoB/L for oxLDL. Induction of IL-8 was stronger for LDL(-)
than for oxLDL, and significant differences were found at 35 to 210 mg
apoB/L.
|
Results obtained with MCP-1 (Figure 2B
) followed the same
pattern as those obtained for IL-8. The concentration of MCP-1 in the
culture medium increased in LDL(-)- or oxLDL-treated cells compared
with untreated or LDL(+)-treated cells. In addition, statistical
differences between LDL(-) and oxLDL were achieved at 70 to 210 mg
apoB/L.
Both LDL(-) and oxLDL increased the levels of PAI-1 in the media of
HUVECs compared with untreated cells, indicating a general stimulation
of PAI-1 by these lipoproteins (please see www... Figure
II). PAI-1 levels were 40% to 50%
higher in LDL(-)- and 40% to 75% higher in oxLDL-treated cells than
in untreated cells (P<0.05) but did not differ from those
of cells treated with LDL(+).
TNF-
was used as a positive control of IL-8, MCP-1, and PAI-1
induction. After 24 hours of stimulation with 20 µg/L of TNF-
,
levels of IL-8, MCP-1, and PAI-1 in the culture medium were 36±10
ng/105 cells, 95±20 ng/105
cells, and 1.41±0.19 µg/105 cells (n=6),
respectively, which were 3.5-, 2.8-, and 1.7-fold higher than those
reached with LDL(-), and 36-, 8-, and 3-fold higher than those reached
in untreated cells, respectively.
The addition of polymyxin B, an LPS inhibitor, did not
modify the release of IL-8, MCP-1, and PAI-1 induced by LDL(-), oxLDL,
or TNF-
(data not shown).
Inhibition of the Effect of LDL(-) on IL-8 and MCP-1
Release
The effects of BHT (free radical scavenger), NAC (free radical
scavenger and glutathione precursor), and BN-50730 (PAF
antagonist) were assessed to determine whether free
radicals or PAF-like oxidized phospholipids were involved in chemokine
release induced by LDL(-).
Production of IL-8 and MCP-1 was inhibited by >60% by NAC
when induced by 140 mg apoB/L of LDL(-) and oxLDL (Figure 3
) and >70% when induced by TNF-
(data not shown). In contrast, preincubation of LDLs with BHT had a
slight effect on IL-8 and MCP-1 release (Figure 3
), which was
statistically significant only when induced by oxLDL. No inhibition of
IL-8 and MCP-1 induction was observed when BHT was
simultaneously mixed with HUVECs and LDL (data not
shown).
|
Pretreatment of cells with increasing amounts of BN-50730 before LDL
addition inhibited, in a concentration-dependent manner, the
production of chemokines in LDL(-)- and oxLDL-treated cells
(Figure 3
). Approximately 50% of inhibition was obtained at
10 µmol/L.
Actinomycin D treatment inhibited LDL(-) and oxLDL-induced IL-8 (60% to 80% inhibition) and MCP-1 (70% to 80% inhibition) generation from HUVECs to levels close to those of LDL(+).
Cytotoxic Effects of oxLDL, LDL(-), and LDL(+)
No toxic effects were found with the LDL(+) and LDL(-)
subfractions at a protein concentration of up to 210 mg/L after 24 and
48 hours of incubation with ECs (please see www... Figure
III). In contrast, some morphological
changes, such as EC gaps and cell detachment, occurred after 24 hours
of incubation with oxLDL at 210 mg/L, and significant cytotoxicity was
found after 48 hours of incubation. Finally, exposure of HUVECs to
7ß-hydroxycholesterol resulted in concentration- and
time-dependent damage, as observed at 50 µmol/L with the
cytotoxicity tests. At higher concentrations (100 µmol/L), this
oxysterol produced cell detachment and was highly toxic (results not
shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been suggested that LDL(-) could be the in vivo counterpart of in vitroobtained MM-LDL, because variable amounts of lipoperoxides have been reported in LDL(-).16 17 18 19 The present study shows that major compositional differences between LDL(-) and LDL(+) consist of the higher triglyceride, sialic acid, apoE, and apoC-III content. These data concur with those reported when similar FPLC procedures were used to isolate LDL(-).21 22 23 In addition, we observed a relative enrichment of the NEFA content in LDL(-) compared with LDL(+). Whether or not these components, which are responsible for the electronegative charge,39 40 41 could mediate the proinflammatory effect of LDL(-) remains unknown. Our data indicate that LDL(-) was not extensively oxidized because its antioxidant and TBARS contents were normal, apoB was not degraded, and electrophoretic motility in agarose was only slightly increased compared with LDL(+). Only increased conjugated dienes indirectly suggest that LDL(-) might present low amounts of oxidized lipids.
OxLDL, but not native LDL, has been reported to increase IL-8 production in the EA.hy 926 endothelial cell line11 and in monocytes.6 10 Mildly oxidized LDLs stimulate monocyte chemotaxis, adherence to and transmigration through the endothelium, and expression of growth factors and cytokines.5 6 7 8 9 The effect of native LDL and oxLDL observed in the present study concurs with these observations. However, the fact that LDL(-) is more active and proinflammatory to human ECs than oxLDL is in agreement with the greater biological activity of MM-LDL compared with oxLDL5 8 13 and with the proinflammatory effect described for all plasma apoB-containing lipoproteins after minimal modifications.42
The use of oxidation inhibitors supports the role of oxidized lipids for the enhanced IL-8 and MCP-1 production induced by LDL(-). NAC, which acts as a glutathione precursor and a free radical scavenger,43 44 was the strongest inhibitor of IL-8 and MCP-1 synthesis induced by both LDL(-) and oxLDL in HUVECs. This observation suggests that oxidative stress participates in this response, as has been described for IL-8 synthesis induced by oxLDL in the EA.hy 926 EC line.11 Thus, the response of endothelium to proinflammatory stimuli may be strongly regulated by the redox status of the cell.11 43 In contrast, the lipophilic antioxidant BHT, which neutralizes the lipoperoxide-derived free radicals contained in oxLDL, partially inhibited MCP-1 and IL-8 production induced by oxLDL but showed no effect on LDL(-)-stimulated cells. This finding suggests that chemokines could be released through different mechanisms by oxLDL and LDL(-). Conversely, the observation that stimulation of both IL-8 and MCP-1 by LDL(-) was partially inhibited by a PAF-receptor antagonist suggests that LDL(-) activity could result in part from the presence of PAF or PAF-like molecules able to activate the PAF receptor.5 42 45
PAI-1 release was slightly induced by LDL(-) and oxLDL, but no
differences were found between these particles and LDL(+), which also
showed a slight concentration-dependent increase; these results concur
with previous data with native and modified LDLs.14 The
findings that LDL(-) strongly induced IL-8 and MCP-1 synthesis by ECs
and that only a small effect was observed with PAI-1 could be explained
by a possible effect of LDL(-) on the nuclear transcription
factor-
B (NF-
B). In fact, IL-8 and MCP-1, but not PAI-1, genes
contain NF-
B binding sites in their promoters.6 46 47
NAC prevents the synthesis of cytokines induced by TNF-
in
HUVECs through the inhibition of NF-
B.43 This
observation is in accordance with our finding that NAC inhibits the
release of IL-8 and MCP-1 induced by LDL(-), oxLDL, and also TNF-
(data not shown). In contrast, it has been reported that NAC has no
effect on TNF-
induced PAI-1 synthesis, which is induced in an
NF-
Bindependent manner.47 These results suggest that
intracellular free radicals could be involved in the effects of LDL(-)
on chemokine release by ECs. Another possibility is that NEFAs, which
are increased in LDL(-), could mediate the proinflammatory response,
because it has been reported that NEFAs induce NF-
B
activation.46 48 It is tempting to speculate, however,
that the effects of LDL(-) on IL-8 and MCP-1 could be indirectly
mediated through endogenous production of
first-wave cytokines, such as TNF-
or
IL-1.10 16 Further experiments are necessary to
characterize the mediators and/or the signal transduction pathways
involved in LDL(-) action.
Our study showed LDL(-) proinflammatory action to be specific and not due to LPS contamination, because (1) neither maintenance media nor LDL(+) derived from the same plasma source as LDL(-) increased chemokine production; (2) LPS inhibitor polymyxin B did not prevent LDL(-)- and oxLDL-induced chemokine release; and (3) undetectable levels of LPS were found in LDL preparations.
In contrast to studies reporting that the LDL(-) subfraction is cytotoxic in HUVECs21 and in rabbit aortic ECs,17 we found no toxic effect in LDL(-)-treated HUVECs. This observation must be attributed to the presence of 4% human serum in the medium and the use of confluent cells, whereas subconfluent cells and absence of serum were used in previous reports.17 21
It is worthwhile to note that LDL(-) at 35 mg apoB/L, which is 2- to 3-fold lower than its plasma concentration in normolipemic subjects, induced a significant release of IL-8 and MCP-1 in HUVECs. This result indicates that small amounts of circulating LDL(-) could locally initiate the synthesis of inflammatory chemokines, a process more evident in some conditions, such as diabetes mellitus or hypercholesterolemia, in which the relative proportion of LDL(-) is strongly increased.24 25 However, because the composition of LDL(-) in these patients may differ from that of healthy subjects, investigations into the effect of LDL(-) from these patients are required. Furthermore, it should be stated that the in vitro response of HUVECs to LDL(-) may not represent the in vivo situation in human vessels. Thus, further studies evaluating in parallel the proportion of LDL(-) and endothelial dysfunction are necessary to confirm the proatherogenic role of this electronegative LDL subfraction in vivo. In conclusion, results obtained in the present study indicate that LDL(-)-mediated release of chemokines by activated endothelium occurs without apparent toxic effects and may participate in the adherence of leukocytes to ECs, an early event in atherogenesis and inflammation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 26, 1999; accepted April 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B and AP-1
transcription factor activity. Blood. 1996;88:34823490.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Zhang, Y. Uehara, S. Hida, S.-i. Miura, D. L. Rainwater, M. Segawa, K. Kumagai, K.-A. Rye, and K. Saku Effects of reconstituted HDL on charge-based LDL subfractions as characterized by capillary isotachophoresis J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 1175 - 1189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Gaubatz, B. K. Gillard, J. B. Massey, R. C. Hoogeveen, M. Huang, E. E. Lloyd, J. L. Raya, C.-y. Yang, and H. J. Pownall Dynamics of dense electronegative low density lipoproteins and their preferential association with lipoprotein phospholipase A2 J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 348 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Dobreva, G. Waeber, R. W. James, and C. Widmann Interleukin-8 Secretion by Fibroblasts Induced by Low Density Lipoproteins Is p38 MAPK-dependent and Leads to Cell Spreading and Wound Closure J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 199 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhang, T. Kaneshi, T. Ohta, and K. Saku Relation between insulin resistance and fast-migrating LDL subfraction as characterized by capillary isotachophoresis J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 2265 - 2277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-W. Ryoo, D.-U. Kim, M. Won, K.-S. Chung, Y.-J. Jang, G.-T. Oh, S.-K. Park, P.-J. Maeng, H.-S. Yoo, and K.-L. Hoe Native LDL induces interleukin-8 expression via H2O2, p38 Kinase, and activator protein-1 in human aortic smooth muscle cells Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2004; 62(1): 185 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Benitez, J. L. Sanchez-Quesada, V. Ribas, O. Jorba, F. Blanco-Vaca, F. Gonzalez-Sastre, and J. Ordonez-Llanos Platelet-Activating Factor Acetylhydrolase Is Mainly Associated With Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfraction Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 92 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-y. Yang, J. L. Raya, H.-H. Chen, C.-H. Chen, Y. Abe, H. J. Pownall, A. A. Taylor, and C. V. Smith Isolation, Characterization, and Functional Assessment of Oxidatively Modified Subfractions of Circulating Low-Density Lipoproteins Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 1083 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Li, L. Liu, H. Chen, T. Sawamura, and J. L. Mehta LOX-1, an Oxidized LDL Endothelial Receptor, Induces CD40/CD40L Signaling in Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 816 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Chen, T. Jiang, J.-H. Yang, W. Jiang, J. Lu, G. K. Marathe, H. J. Pownall, C. M. Ballantyne, T. M. McIntyre, P. D. Henry, et al. Low-Density Lipoprotein in Hypercholesterolemic Human Plasma Induces Vascular Endothelial Cell Apoptosis by Inhibiting Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Transcription Circulation, April 29, 2003; 107(16): 2102 - 2108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Suriyaphol, D. Fenske, U. Zahringer, S.-R. Han, S. Bhakdi, and M. Husmann Enzymatically Modified Nonoxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Induces Interleukin-8 in Human Endothelial Cells: Role of Free Fatty Acids Circulation, November 12, 2002; 106(20): 2581 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Sanchez-Quesada, S. Benitez, C. Otal, M. Franco, F. Blanco-Vaca, and J. Ordonez-Llanos Density distribution of electronegative LDL in normolipemic and hyperlipemic subjects J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2002; 43(5): 699 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Sanchez-Quesada, A. Perez, A. Caixas, M. Rigla, A. Payes, S. Benitez, and J. Ordonez-Llanos Effect of Glycemic Optimization on Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein in Diabetes: Relation to Nonenzymatic Glycosylation and Oxidative Modification J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2001; 86(7): 3243 - 3249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||