Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Noninvasive Laboratory (M.V.M., R.T.L.), Vascular Medicine and Atherosclerosis Unit (M.A., P.L.), and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (P.G.), Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, and the MRI Division, Department of Radiology (S.E.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: atherosclerosis MRI cholesterol
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An important challenge has been the development of technologies that directly image the atheroma itself, rather than simply the angiographic lumen.10 11 MRI is a promising technology in that it can provide noninvasive imaging with sub-millimeter resolution and high tissue contrast. This has been applied to the imaging and spectroscopy of ex vivo and in vivo atherosclerotic plaque, in both animals and humans.12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Although plaque progression by MRI has been shown in animals,15 16 the use of MRI to study atherosclerosis regression and the effects of cholesterol lowering remains untested, to our knowledge. In this study, MRI was used to image rabbit aortic atherosclerotic plaque in vivo in response to dietary cholesterol lowering.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
MRI
Rabbits were sedated with ketamine/xylazine (as above)
and imaged supine in a 1.5 Tesla MRI system (SIGNA, General
Electric). A high-strength (30 mT/m) insert gradient system
(Bruker Instruments) was used with a cylindrical 17-cm diameter
radiofrequency coil. Gradient-echo scout images were used to identify
the abdominal aorta and its bifurcation. Then, 13 axial slices (2-mm
thick with a 1-mm gap) of the aorta from the level of the bifurcation
were obtained using a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence with an
in-plane resolution of 310x310 µm (FOV=8cm, TE=45 ms, TR=2300
ms, echo-train length=5, NEX=8). The TE was chosen to provide a
T2-weighting intermediate to the reported T2 measurements of fibrous
versus lipid plaque components.18 19 22 Superior and
inferior saturation slabs were used to null signal from
blood. Electrocardiographic gating was not used (vessel motion
artifacts were not seen). Fat suppression was used to null signal from
peri-adventitial fat, which can obscure the vessel wall due to chemical
shift.22 In contrast to peri-adventitial fat, the
relatively immobile lipid protons in plaque have been shown to
contribute only 10% of the signal18 and thus fat
suppression has a negligible effect on the plaque
itself.15 19
MRI Analysis
MRI images were transferred to a workstation (Sun
Microsystems) where a custom-designed MRI image analysis
program was used to quantitate plaque size. The MRI images were
centered on the aorta and magnified 4-fold. The aortic lumen and outer
wall were traced manually using a mouse device by an observer blinded
to dietary therapy. Plaque thickness and % area stenosis
([outer wall area-lumen area]/[outer wall area]) were calculated
for each slice as for intravascular ultrasound data.23
Sixteen radial chord lengths were averaged to calculate plaque
thickness. The mean plaque thickness and % area stenosis over
the 13 slices were calculated for each animal.
Histology
Rabbits were euthanized within 48 hours after MRI by
intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (120 mg/kg),
as well as heparin (1000 U/kg) to prevent blood clotting. The abdominal
aorta was marked at 3 mm intervals from the bifurcation
(corresponding to the MRI slice positions) before excision. Six rabbits
at the 12-month time point underwent pressure-perfusion fixation in 2%
paraformaldehyde for validation of MRI measurements
with histomorphometry (immunohistochemistry studies21
precluded pressure-perfused fixation for all rabbits). Aortas from all
other rabbits were snap frozen using isopentane chilled with liquid
nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Specimens were later embedded in
paraffin, sectioned in 3 µm slices, and stained with hematoxylin
and eosin.
Histology Analysis
The pressure-perfused histology specimens from the validation
subset were photographed and then manually traced using a mouse device
by a second observer blinded to dietary therapy and the MRI data.
Plaque thickness and % area stenosis were calculated as
described above.
Statistical Analysis
Linear regression was used to correlate the individual MRI and
histomorphometry measurements from the validation subset. The
Student's t test was used to compare the mean MRI plaque
measurements between dietary interventions at the 3 time points. All
probability values are 2-sided, with significance at the 0.05
level.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Validation Measurements
In the subset of 6 animals that underwent pressure-perfused
fixation at the 12-month time point, MRI measurements of vessel wall
area (r=0.86) and lumen area (r=0.82) correlated
closely with histomorphometric measurements (both P<0.0001)
(Figure 2
).
|
Diet Effects on Plaque Size
In the rabbits subjected to dietary cholesterol
lowering, MRI detected a significant reduction of % area
stenosis (44.6±2.1% at 20 months versus 55.8±1.5% at
baseline, P=0.0002) (Table 1
,
Figures 3
and 4
). Similarly, plaque thickness decreased
significantly in this low-cholesterol group
(0.60±0.05 mm at 20 months versus 0.85±0.06 mm at baseline,
P=0.006) (Table 2
). In
contrast, there was a significant increase in % area stenosis
in the rabbits maintained on high-cholesterol diet
(69.8±3.8% at 20 months versus 55.8±1.5% at baseline,
P=0.001), with a trend toward increase in plaque thickness
(1.02±0.08 mm at 20 months versus 0.85±0.06 mm at baseline,
P=0.1).
|
|
|
|
Comparing low- and high-cholesterol groups, the
decrease in % area stenosis with cholesterol
lowering was evident by 12 months (46.7±2.2% low versus 58.8±3.8%
high, P=0.01) and greater by 20 months (44.6±2.1% low
versus 69.8±3.8%, P=0.0001) (Table 1
, Figure 3
). The difference in plaque thickness between low- and
high-cholesterol groups was also significant by 12 months
(0.63±0.05 mm low versus 0.87±0.08 mm high,
P=0.02) and at 20 months (0.60±0.05 mm low versus
1.02±0.08 mm high, P=0.001) (Table 2
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MRI of atherosclerotic plaque was initially demonstrated ex vivo with the use of both imaging and spectroscopic methods.12 13 18 In vivo plaque imaging14 15 16 17 19 has been more challenging, given the presence of biological motion and time constraints. In vivo MRI of atherosclerosis has been demonstrated in several animal models, including rabbits,14 15 rats,16 and mice.17 MRI of plaque progression was shown by Skinner et al15 in 6 balloon-injured rabbits placed on a high-cholesterol diet for up to 16 months. Summers et al16 demonstrated the development of carotid thickening up to 2 weeks after balloon injury in the rat. In vivo MRI of human atherosclerosis was demonstrated by Toussaint et al,19 who imaged advanced carotid plaques in 6 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. With T2-weighted imaging, they found relative signal loss within the lipid regions of the plaque compared with the fibrous regions, as identified on histology.
The primary goal of the study was to detect changes in plaque
size in response to low- and high-cholesterol diets. Plaque
characterization was limited, as areas of signal loss within the plaque
(corresponding to the lipid-rich regions on histology) were seen only
in the animal with very advanced plaque thickening (Figure 4D
and 4E
). Plaque components were not generally detected likely due to
(1) spatial resolution, (2) suboptimal tissue contrast, and/or (3)
differences between human and rabbit plaque. A resolution of 300
µm still only provides 3 pixels to discriminate plaque structure in a
typical 1-mm thick plaque. The optimal T2-weighting may differ between
human and rabbit plaque and potentially may relate to the particular
diet used. Differences in lipid composition and MRI appearance between
human and atherosclerotic rabbit plaque have been
documented.20 Other MRI contrast mechanisms (eg,
diffusion,24 magnetization transfer,25 and
chemical-shift imaging13 ) offer additional approaches to
plaque characterization and warrant further investigation.
There are limitations to comparing in vivo MRI data with histomorphometric measurements. Pressure-perfused fixation is typically used to minimize shrinkage. However, there can be further shrinkage with histologic staining,26 as well as vessel shape changes due to sectioning.12 In addition, the slice thickness of the MRI image (2 mm) greatly exceeds that of histology (3 µm), a concern raised by previous authors.12 26 This volume averaging on MRI, which is exacerbated if there is any angulation of the aorta to the imaging plane, can contribute to an overestimation of plaque size and an underestimation of lumen size by MRI. An additional limitation is that sacrificing animals at multiple time points for histologic validation and immunohistochemistry studies precluded serial observations and limited the use of pressure-perfused fixation.
The balloon-injury model was used, rather than hypercholesterolemia alone, as it generates larger more uniform plaques with more human-like fibrous regions overlying lipid-rich regions.21 Clearly, these rabbit atheromata develop over months, compared with decades for humans. Thus, it is not surprising that significant regression can be induced with dietary intervention, despite the lack of evidence for substantial regression in human trials. The immunohistochemistry data in rabbits show a reduction in lipid content and cellular infiltrate with cholesterol lowering.21 A major difference in the human studies is that the angiographic lumen rather than the actual plaque was measured, making it possible that human plaque regression occurs but is not detected as lumen size is maintained.
The ability of MRI to study the atheroma directly and noninvasively has the potential for greater understanding of both the mechanisms of plaque progression and the effects of therapy on plaque size and structure. Further advances in MRI, such as higher-field magnets, high-strength gradient systems,14 and phased-array,15 implanted,16 or intravascular26 27 radiofrequency coils, will contribute to the improvement of in vivo plaque characterization. Thus, MRI is a promising noninvasive technology for studying the atherosclerotic plaque and its response to therapeutic interventions.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 9, 1998; accepted January 14, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:242250, 310318.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Libby P. Molecular bases of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 1995;28442850.
4.
Davies MJ, Thomas AC. Plaque fissuring: the
cause of acute myocardial infarction, sudden death, and crescendo
angina. Br Heart J. 1985;53:363373.
5. Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, Hjemdahl-Monsen CE, Leavy J, Weiss M, Borrico S, Gorlin R, Fuster V. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:5662.[Abstract]
6.
Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA,
Burrows MT, Kahl FR, Santamore WP. Can coronary angiography
predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with
mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease?
Circulation. 1988;78:11571166.
7. Brown G, Albers JJ, Fisher LD, Schaefer SM, Lin JT, Kaplan C, Zhao XQ, Bisson BD, Fitzpatrick VF, Dodge HT. Regression of coronary artery disease as a result of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in men with high levels of apolipoprotein B. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:12891298.[Abstract]
8. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:13831389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR,
Macfarlane PW, McKillop JH, Packard CJ, for the West of Scotland
Coronary Prevention Group. Prevention of coronary heart
disease with pravastatin in men with
hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J
Med. 1995;333:13011307.
10. Libby P. Lesion versus lumen. Nat Med. 1995;1:1718.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. McConnell MV, Ganz PG, Lee RT, Selwyn AP, Libby P. Imaging atherosclerosis: lesion vs. lumen. In: Reiber JHC, van der Wall EE, eds. Cardiovascular Imaging. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996:93107.
12. Pearlman JD, Southern JF, Ackerman JL. Nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy of atheroma in human coronary arteries. Angiology. 1991;42:726733.
13. Gold GE, Pauly JM, Glover GH, Moretto JC, Macovski A, Herfkens RJ. Characterization of atherosclerosis with a 1.5T imaging system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:399407.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Yuan C, Tsuruda JS, Beach KN, Hayes CE, Ferguson MS, Alpers CE, Foo TK, Strandness DE. Techniques for high-resolution MR imaging of atherosclerotic plaque. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994;4:4349.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Skinner MP, Yuan C, Mitsumori L, Hayes CE, Raines EW, Nelson JA, Ross R. Serial magnetic resonance imaging of experimental atherosclerosis detects lesion fine structure, progression and complications in vivo. Nat Med. 1995;1:6973.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Summers RM, Hedlund LW, Cofer GP, Gottsman MB, Manibo JF, Johnson GA. MR microscopy of the rat carotid artery after balloon injury by using an implanted imaging coil. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:785789.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Fayad ZA, Fallon JT, Shinnar M, Wehrli S, Dansky HM,
Poon M, Badimon JJ, Charlton SA, Fisher EA, Breslow JL, Fuster V.
Noninvasive in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of
atherosclerotic lesions in genetically engineered mice.
Circulation. 1998;98:15411547.
18. Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, Kantor HL. T2-weighted contrast for NMR characterization of human atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:15331542.
19.
Toussaint JF, LaMuraglia GM, Southern JF, Fuster V,
Kantor HL. Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified,
hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human
atherosclerosis in vivo. Circulation. 1996;94:932938.
20. Trouard TP, Altbach MI, Hunter GC, Eskelson CD, Gmitro AF. MRI and NMR spectroscopy of the lipids of atherosclerotic plaque in rabbits and humans. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:1926.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Aikawa M, Rabkin E, Okada Y, Voglic SJ, Clinton SK,
Brinckerhoff CE, Sukhova GK, Libby P. Lipid lowering by diet reduces
matrix metalloproteinase activity and increases collagen content of
rabbit atheroma: a potential mechanism of lesion
stabilization. Circulation. 1998;97:24332444.
22. Weisskoff RM, Edelman RR. Basic principles of MRI. In: Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB, eds. Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1996:351.
23.
Anderson TJ, Meredith IT, Uehata A, Mudge GH, Selwyn
AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC. Functional significance of intimal thickening as
detected by intravascular ultrasound early and late after cardiac
transplantation. Circulation. 1993;88:10931100.
24.
Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, Kantor HL. Water
diffusion properties of human atherosclerosis and
thrombosis measured by pulse field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:542546.
25. Pachot-Clouard M, Vaufrey F, Darrasse L, Toussainti JF. Magnetization transfer characteristics in atherosclerotic plaque components assessed by adapted binomial preparation pulses. MAGMA. 1998;7:915.
26.
Correia LCL, Atalar E, Keleman MD, Ocali O, Hutchins
GM, Fleg JL, Gerstenblith G, Zerhouni EA, Lima JAC. Intravascular
magnetic resonance imaging of aortic atherosclerotic plaque
composition. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:36263632.
27. Martin AJ, Henkelman RM. Intravascular MR imaging in a porcine animal model. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:224229.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L. Wilensky, H. K. Song, and V. A. Ferrari Role of magnetic resonance and intravascular magnetic resonance in the detection of vulnerable plaques. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8 Suppl): C48 - C56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Larose, Y. Yeghiazarians, P. Libby, E.K. Yucel, M. Aikawa, D. F. Kacher, E. Aikawa, S. Kinlay, F. J. Schoen, A. P. Selwyn, et al. Characterization of Human Atherosclerotic Plaques by Intravascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, October 11, 2005; 112(15): 2324 - 2331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Viles-Gonzalez, V. Fuster, R. Corti, C. Valdiviezo, R. Hutter, S. Corda, S. X. Anand, and J. J. Badimon Atherosclerosis regression and TP receptor inhibition: effect of S18886 on plaque size and composition--a magnetic resonance imaging study Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2005; 26(15): 1557 - 1561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Corti, V. Fuster, Z. A. Fayad, S. G. Worthley, G. Helft, W. F. Chaplin, J. Muntwyler, J. F. Viles-Gonzalez, J. Weinberger, D. A. Smith, et al. Effects of Aggressive Versus Conventional Lipid-Lowering Therapy by Simvastatin on Human Atherosclerotic Lesions: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial With High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 106 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A.C. Lima, M. Y. Desai, H. Steen, W. P. Warren, S. Gautam, and S. Lai Statin-Induced Cholesterol Lowering and Plaque Regression After 6 Months of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Monitored Therapy Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2336 - 2341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Viles-Gonzalez, M. Poon, J. Sanz, T. Rius, K. Nikolaou, Z. A. Fayad, V. Fuster, and J. J. Badimon In Vivo 16-Slice, Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Experimental Atherosclerosis: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathology Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): 1467 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Corti, J. I. Osende, J. T. Fallon, V. Fuster, G. Mizsei, H. Jneid, S. D. Wright, W. F. Chaplin, and J. J. Badimon The selective peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist has an additive effect on plaque regression in combination with simvastatin in experimental atherosclerosis: in vivo study by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 464 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kanai, H. Hasegawa, M. Ichiki, F. Tezuka, and Y. Koiwa Elasticity Imaging of Atheroma With Transcutaneous Ultrasound: Preliminary Study Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3018 - 3021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Worthley, G. Helft, V. Fuster, Z. A. Fayad, M. Shinnar, L. A. Minkoff, C. Schechter, J. T. Fallon, and J. J. Badimon A Novel Nonobstructive Intravascular MRI Coil: In Vivo Imaging of Experimental Atherosclerosis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2003; 23(2): 346 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Corti, V. Fuster, Z. A. Fayad, S. G. Worthley, G. Helft, D. Smith, J. Weinberger, J. Wentzel, G. Mizsei, M. Mercuri, et al. Lipid Lowering by Simvastatin Induces Regression of Human Atherosclerotic Lesions: Two Years' Follow-Up by High-Resolution Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, December 3, 2002; 106(23): 2884 - 2887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. A. Fayad, V. Fuster, K. Nikolaou, and C. Becker Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Plaque Imaging: Current and Potential Future Concepts Circulation, October 8, 2002; 106(15): 2026 - 2034. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Choudhury, V. Fuster, J. J. Badimon, E. A. Fisher, and Z. A. Fayad MRI and Characterization of Atherosclerotic Plaque: Emerging Applications and Molecular Imaging Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2002; 22(7): 1065 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Johnstone, R. M. Botnar, A. S. Perez, R. Stewart, W. C. Quist, J. A. Hamilton, and W. J. Manning In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Experimental Thrombosis in a Rabbit Model Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, September 1, 2001; 21(9): 1556 - 1560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. A. Fayad and V. Fuster Clinical Imaging of the High-Risk or Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque Circ. Res., August 17, 2001; 89(4): 305 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Corti, Z. A. Fayad, V. Fuster, S. G. Worthley, G. Helft, J. Chesebro, M. Mercuri, and J. J. Badimon Effects of Lipid-Lowering by Simvastatin on Human Atherosclerotic Lesions: A Longitudinal Study by High-Resolution, Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, July 17, 2001; 104(3): 249 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Aikawa and P. Libby Vascular inflammation and activation: new targets for lipid lowering Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2001; 3(suppl_B): B3 - B11. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.e. Helft, S. G. Worthley, V. Fuster, A. G. Zaman, C. Schechter, J. I. Osende, O. J. Rodriguez, Z. A. Fayad, J. T. Fallon, and J. J. Badimon Atherosclerotic aortic component quantification by noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging: an in vivo study in rabbits J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2001; 37(4): 1149 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Stein and O. Stein Does Therapeutic Intervention Achieve Slowing of Progression or Bona Fide Regression of Atherosclerotic Lesions? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2001; 21(2): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Worthley, G. Helft, V. Fuster, A. G. Zaman, Z. A. Fayad, J. T. Fallon, and J. J. Badimon Serial In Vivo MRI Documents Arterial Remodeling in Experimental Atherosclerosis Circulation, February 15, 2000; 101(6): 586 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Helft, S. G. Worthley, V. Fuster, Z. A. Fayad, A. G. Zaman, R. Corti, J. T. Fallon, and J. J. Badimon Progression and Regression of Atherosclerotic Lesions: Monitoring With Serial Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, February 26, 2002; 105(8): 993 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |