Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999;19:1333-1339

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakata, A.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuzawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakata, A.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuzawa, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Oxidant stress
Right arrow Pathophysiology
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999;19:1333-1339.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

CD36, a Novel Receptor for Oxidized Low-Density Lipoproteins, Is Highly Expressed on Lipid-Laden Macrophages in Human Atherosclerotic Aorta

Atsuyuki Nakata; Yumiko Nakagawa; Makoto Nishida; Shuichi Nozaki; Jun-ichiro Miyagawa; Tsutomu Nakagawa; Ritsu Tamura; Kengo Matsumoto; Kaoru Kameda-Takemura; Shizuya Yamashita; Yuji Matsuzawa

*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—CD36 has been reported to be a receptor for oxidized LDL (Ox-LDL). In our previous study, the uptake of Ox-LDL in CD36-deficient macrophages was reduced by approximately 50% compared with that in control macrophages, suggesting an important role of CD36 as a receptor for Ox-LDL in humans. In the current study, we examined the immunohistochemical localization of CD36 in human aorta in comparison with that of scavenger receptor class A type I and type II (SRA). Cryostat sections were made from aortic tissues. For immunohistochemical staining, the following antibodies were used: (1) FA6-152, anti-CD36 antibody, and (2) SRI-2, which recognizes both type I and type II SRAs. Immunohistochemical staining for CD36 and SRA was performed using labeled streptavidin method. In macrophages scattered in aortic walls without atherosclerotic lesions, the expression of CD36 was hardly observed, whereas that of SRA was detected weakly but consistently. In contrast, in atherosclerotic lesions, macrophages around the core region showed a weak immunoreactivity to CD36 and a strong immunoreactivity to SRA. Furthermore, lipid-laden macrophages, which mainly existed in the core region, had a strongly positive immunoreactivity to CD36, but a low or moderate level of immunoreactivity to SRA. The distributions of CD36 and SRA were different from each other, and especially foamed, large-sized macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques tended to more abundantly express CD36 protein. These data demonstrate, for the first time, that the expression of both CD36 and SRA might be differentially regulated in aortic walls, and might play different roles in the formation of foam cells in atherosclerotic lesions.


Key Words: CD36 • atherosclerosis • scavenger receptor • oxidized LDL • macrophage


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Anumber of epidemiological studies have demonstrated that increased levels of LDLs are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis. The exact mechanisms by which increased plasma LDL concentrations lead to the development of atherosclerosis have not been clarified. It has recently been shown that modified LDLs, especially oxidized LDL (Ox-LDL), play important roles during the formation of atherosclerotic lesions. LDL must be modified before LDL becomes pathogenic.1 2 Several studies have indicated that Ox-LDL is generated in vitro through oxidation by Cu2+ ion or by incubation of LDL with cells such as endothelial cells, macrophages, and smooth muscle cells.3 4 5 6 7 The latter mechanism was attributed to the generation of oxidants by the cells.8 9 Several studies have shown that Ox-LDL exists in vivo in atherosclerotic arterial walls.10 11 12 The importance of Ox-LDL in atherogenesis has also been suggested in animal studies by administration of antioxidants such as probucol.13 14 15

Once LDL particles are oxidized, they are no longer recognized by the LDL receptor. Instead, Ox-LDL is recognized by receptors on macrophages. Scavenger receptor class A type I and type II (SRA), which was originally cloned by Kodama et al,16 has been considered a major receptor for Ox-LDL in vivo. Both acetyl-LDL (Ac-LDL) and Ox-LDL can bind to SRA. The uptake of Ac-LDL was completely blocked by an excessive amount of Ac-LDL in Ac-LDL receptor (SRA) cDNA transfected cells, although the uptake of Ox-LDL was not completely blocked by Ac-LDL in macrophages and isolated Kupffer cells. Therefore, it was suggested that Ox-LDL might also be taken up by other receptors.17 18

CD36 is a glycoprotein with a molecular weight of 88 kDa and is expressed on platelets, monocyte-macrophages, and capillary endothelial cells.19 The physiological function of CD36 was proposed to be a receptor for both thrombospondin and collagen,20 21 22 to mediate cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum-parasitized erythrocytes,23 24 and to be a transporter of long-chain fatty acids.25 26 Endemann et al27 have recently reported that CD36 binds Ox-LDL. However, the pathophysiological role of CD36 in terms of atherogenesis has not been clarified. We have identified CD36-deficient subjects and clarified their gene abnormalities.28 29 30 31 We have recently demonstrated that in CD36-deficient macrophages, the uptake of Ox-LDL was reduced by {approx}50% compared with that in control macrophages and that cholesteryl ester accumulation was also reduced in CD36-deficient macrophages.32 These findings suggested that CD36 is involved in the formation of foam cells in atherosclerotic lesions. CD36 belongs to the class B scavenger receptor gene family, in which LIMPII (lysosomal integral membrane glycoprotein II) and CLA-I (CD36 and LIMPII analogous-I) are included.

In immunohistochemical analyses, SRA was detected in macrophages of aortic intima, especially in fatty streaks and atherosclerotic plaques, suggesting a significant role of SRA in the process of atherogenesis.33 34 35 However, it has not been clarified whether the tissue distributions of these 2 major receptors, CD36 and SRA, are the same or not. In the present study, we investigated the expression of CD36 and SRA in human aorta. We demonstrated that CD36 is expressed on macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions of aorta and that the distributions of CD36-positive and SRA-positive macrophages are different in human atherosclerotic lesions, suggesting the differential contributions of these receptors to foam cell formation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
Human aortic tissues (mainly descending thoracic aorta) were obtained from 22 autopsied cases. Autopsies were performed within 5 hours after death. Informed consents were obtained from the bereaved families. Table 1Down depicts the age, sex, and cause of death of the subjects. Aortic tissues were embedded in Tissue-Tek® OCT compound (Miles Inc), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until use. Cryostat sections were cut 7 or 8 µm thick and air-dried for immunohistochemical staining and for oil red O staining.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Status or Cause of Death

Antibodies
For immunohistochemical staining, the following antibodies were used: (1) FA6-152, anti-human CD36 monoclonal antibody (mouse IgG1 fraction) from Cosmo Bio Co, (2) SRI-2, anti-human SRA antibody (mouse serum fraction), which was a gift from Dr Tatsuhiko Kodama, Tokyo University, and (3) HAM56, anti-macrophage antibody (mouse IgM fraction) from DAKO.

Immunohistochemical Detection of CD36 and SRA
Frozen sections were washed in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6), fixed for 10 minutes with acetone, and washed in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl buffer for 10 minutes. For detection of CD36, after incubation of the section with 10% normal goat serum for 5 minutes at room temperature, an alkaline phosphatase method was used, with mouse anti-CD36 monoclonal antibodies FA6-152 diluted 1/200 in Tris-HCl buffer containing 1% BSA (30 minutes at room temperature), biotinylated anti-mouse immunoglobulins in PBS (10 minutes at room temperature), and streptavidin alkaline phosphatase (10 minutes at room temperature). A positive reaction on the tissue sections was visualized with a substrate-chromogen solution (DAKO). For detection of SRA, after treatment of the section with 3% H2O2 solution for 5 minutes and washing it in distilled water for 5 minutes and in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) for 5 minutes, the tissue was incubated with 10% normal goat serum for 5 minutes at room temperature. The peroxidase method was adopted using mouse anti-SRA immunoglobulins diluted 1/500 in Tris-HCl buffer containing 1% BSA (30 minutes at room temperature), biotinylated anti-mouse immunoglobulins in PBS (10 minutes at room temperature), and streptavidin peroxidase (10 minutes at room temperature). A positive reaction was visualized by incubation for 5 to 20 minutes at room temperature in peroxidase substrate solution containing DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) (Zymed Laboratories, Inc). As a negative control, normal mouse IgG1 (DAKO) and (mouse preimmune serum) were used for CD36 and SRA, respectively.

Identification of Macrophages
For identification of macrophages in aortic walls, frozen tissue sections were incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature with 1.5% normal goat serum diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA, followed by an incubation with mouse monoclonal antibodies against human macrophages (HAM56, Biomeda) diluted 1/50 in PBS containing 1% BSA. After washing the section in PBS, the ABC (avidin-biotin complex) method was applied to detect macrophages using biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgM, diluted 1/2000, and VECSTATIN ABC Reagent (Vector Laboratories, Inc). A positive reaction was visualized by incubation for 5 to 20 minutes at room temperature in peroxidase substrate solution containing DAB. As a negative control, normal mouse IgM (DAKO) was used. For detecting lipids accumulated in foam cells, oil red O staining was performed.

Double Immunohistochemical Staining for CD36 and SRA
Sections were stained immunohistochemically for SRA using the peroxidase method as described above and washed for 2 hours in 0.1 mol/L glycine hydrochloride buffer (pH 2.2). After further washing in PBS, the sections were incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature with 10% normal mouse serum diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA, followed by an incubation with FITC-labeled FA6-152 diluted 1/100 in PBS containing 1% BSA. The sections were washed in PBS for 30 minutes, mounted with Perma Fluor aqueous mounting medium (Immunon), and observed using a fluorescence microscope with epi-illumination (Olympus). As a negative control, normal mouse IgG1 and mouse preimmune serum were used for CD36 and SRA, respectively.

Semiquantification of the Immunoreactivity to CD36 and SRA in Macrophages of Atherosclerotic Plaques
Two parameters were used for the semiquantification of staining results, namely the intensity of staining and the proportion of SRA- or CD36-positive cells in atherosclerotic plaques. To avoid biased judgment, 2 investigators who were unaware of the type of immunohistochemical staining were asked to assign grading to the staining intensity and the proportion of SRA- or CD36-positive cells. The average of the score of 2 parameters given by 2 investigators was used for the analysis.

The intima of atherosclerotic plaque was arbitrarily divided into 3 lesions from the lumen to the media: cap lesion, transitional lesion, and core lesion in order. We could easily distinguish the fibrous cap from the lipid core. The fibrous cap was named as a cap lesion. The region between cap and core lesions where moderately foamed macrophages were scattered was named a transitional lesion.

For semiquantification of the staining intensity, sections that were doubly immunohistochemically stained for CD36 and SRA were used. Each staining intensity of 3 lesions was graded from 0 to V (0 indicates none; I, very weak; II, weak; III, moderate; IV, strong; and V, very strong).

To determine the proportion of SRA- or CD36-positive cells in atherosclerotic plaques, we doubly immunohistochemically stained with HAM56 and CD36, and with HAM56 and SRA, in 2 consecutive sections. Nine nonoverlapping low-power fields (final magnification, x600) were investigated in each plaque: 3 areas of the cap lesion, 3 areas of the transitional lesion, and 3 areas of the core lesion were examined. The results were expressed as the percentage of the positive immunoreactivity to CD36 or SRA relative to the total macrophages of each field.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Localization of CD36 and SRA in Human Aorta
In the current study we first evaluated the localization of CD36 in the aortas of adults with atherosclerotic lesions. First, we analyzed the regions of aorta without atherosclerosis that were identified as macroscopically normal. Although some macrophages were observed in these regions, the immunoreactivity of CD36 in macrophages was very low or negative in almost all sections from 22 cases examined. Representative microscopic pictures are shown in Figure 1aDown and 1bDown.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical localization of CD36 (a), macrophages (b), and SRA (c) in sections from an aorta without atherosclerosis (a 48-year-old man, case 1) (a, b, and c, x70, bar=150 µm). In this section intimal cells had no immunoreactivity to CD36 (a), although a small number of macrophages could be detected in this area of the consecutive section (b). In contrast, intimal cells, presumably macrophages, with positive immunohistochemical staining for SRA protein could be observed (c). I indicates intima; M, media.

The expression of SRA in the aorta was next examined using SRI-2 antibodies. SRA was expressed in macrophages from normal aorta without atherosclerosis (Figure 1cUp). Macrophages detected in the intima of macroscopically normal aorta were oil red O-negative (data not shown). In contrast to these observations, many macrophages in mildly atherosclerotic plaques and in the deep region of atherosclerotic plaques had a strongly positive immunoreactivity to CD36 protein, and these macrophages tended to be large and foamed (Figures 2Down and 3Down). Macrophages were also observed scattering in the surface layer of atherosclerotic plaques or around these plaques (Figure 3bDown and 3dDown). These macrophages were, however, small and less foamed, and had little immunoreactivity to CD36 protein (Figure 3cDown). Concerning the expression of SRA in these atherosclerotic lesions, many macrophages in the areas of atherosclerotic plaques were positive for SRI-2 immunoreactivity.



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical localization of CD36 (a), macrophages (b), and SRA (c) in sections from a mildly atherosclerotic plaque (a 66-year-old man, case 4) (a, b, and c, x170, bar=60 µm). Many macrophages could be detected in the intima. CD36 protein was mainly localized in macrophages, which tended to be foamed. The macrophages in this area weakly expressed SRA protein. Abbreviations as in Figure 1Up.



View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Low-power view (a, b) of CD36 (a, c, and e) and macrophage (b, d, and f) localization in consecutive sections from the atherosclerotic plaque and higher magnifications of a luminal side area (c, d) and a deep region (e, f) of the plaque where many foamed macrophages were observed (a 64-year-old man, case 10) (a and b, x90, bar=100 µm; c, d, e, and f, x510, bar=20 µm). Many macrophages could be detected in both the luminal and deeper regions of atherosclerotic plaque. However, CD36 protein was mainly localized in macrophages of the deeper region, which tended to become larger in size and much more foamed than those localized in the region of luminal surface (arrowheads in e and f indicate the same cells). CD36 protein was hardly observed immunohistochemically in macrophages of the surface region, which were smaller in size and not so foamed (arrowheads in c and d also indicate the same cell). No smooth muscle cells in the media showed positive immunohistochemical stainings for CD36 (data not shown). Abbreviations as in Figure 1Up.

Differential Localization of CD36 and SRA in Atherosclerotic Plaques
To examine the differential localization of CD36 and SRA more clearly, we performed a double immunohistochemical staining analysis of aortic plaques (Figure 4Down). A number of CD36-positive cells were restricted mainly to the core of plaques, whereas many SRA-positive cells were localized around the core of plaques. Macrophages with a CD36 immunoreactivity tended to have little immunoreactivity to SRA. Therefore, the cell populations consisting of CD36-positive cells and those consisting of strongly SRA-positive cells were relatively well separated from each other.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Differential localization of CD36 and SRA by a double immunohistochemical staining method in 4 different sections from an aorta with atherosclerotic plaques (a, b: a 72-year-old man, case 20; c, d: a 76-year-old woman, case 15; e, f: a 63-year-old man, case 12; g, h: a 64-year-old man, case 10). a, c, e, and g, Immunohistochemical localization of SRA in the atherosclerotic plaque. b, d, f, and h, Localization of CD36 in the same section. Immunofluorescence of FITC is shown in green color, whereas intracellular autofluorescence (probably lipofuscin) appears yellow (a through h, x100, bar=100 µm). Many CD36-positive cells were localized in the core region of plaques (a), and a number of SRA-positive cells were observed around the core of plaques (fibrous cap, shoulder region) (b). Macrophages with positive immunoreactivity to CD36 appeared to be much more foamed and to have little immunoreactivity to SRA. Abbreviations as in Figure 1Up.

We further evaluated the differential distribution of SRA and CD36. Semiquantitative assessment of staining intensity for CD36 and SRA in the intima of atherosclerotic plaques of human aorta is shown in Figure 5ADown. CD36 was strongest in the staining intensity in the core lesion, and gradually became less intense closer to the lumen. In contrast, SRA became more strongly intense closer to the lumen and was strongest in the cap lesion. The proportion of SRA- or CD36-positive cells in atherosclerotic plaques is shown in Figure 5BDown. As with staining intensity, CD36-positive macrophages were most frequently observed in the core lesion, and less frequently observed closer to the lumen. On the other hand, SRA-positive macrophages were most frequently recognized in the cap lesion and less frequently in the core lesion.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Semiquantitative analyses of differential localization of CD36 and SRA. Two parameters were used for semiquantification as described in methods. {circ} and {diamondsuit} indicate CD36 and SRA, respectively. A, Semiquantitative assessment of the staining intensity for CD36 and SRA in the intima of atherosclerotic plaques. The results were expressed as the mean±SE of the total specimen analyzed in each lesion. CD36 was strongest in staining intensity in the core lesion, and gradually became weaker closer to the lumen. In contrast, SRA became stronger in staining intensity closer to the lumen and was strongest in the cap lesion. B, Semiquantitative assessment of the proportion of SRA- or CD36-positive cells stained in atherosclerotic plaques. The results were expressed as the percentage of the positive immunoreactivity to CD36 or SRA relative to the total macrophages of each field. As with staining intensity, CD36-positive macrophages were most frequently observed in the core lesion, and less frequently observed closer to the lumen. On the other hand, SRA-positive macrophages were most frequently recognized in the cap lesion and less frequently in the core lesion.

Distribution of CD36-Positive Cells and Oil Red O-Positive Cells
Next, we analyzed and compared the distribution patterns of lipid-laden foam cells stained with oil red O and those of SRA-positive and CD36-positive cells in consecutive sections of atherosclerotic lesions to examine whether CD36 expression is changed in the process of the formation of foam cells. As shown in Figure 6Down, the distribution of oil red O-positive area was similar to that of CD36 but had less relation to that of SRA. These immunohistochemical analyses demonstrate that the expression of CD36 may be induced in response to the accumulation of cholesteryl ester in macrophages through taking up Ox-LDL.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunohistochemical localization of SRA- (a), CD36- (b), and oil red O-positive (c) cells in sections from an aorta with atherosclerotic plaque (an 81-year-old man, case 5). a and b, Double immunohistochemical staining of SRA and CD36 in the atherosclerotic plaque. c, oil red O staining in the consecutive section of a and b (a, b, and c, x220, bar=50 µm). Immunoreactivity to SRA protein was stronger in the cap region than in the core region. The distribution of CD36-positive cells with foamy appearance was similar to that of oil red O-positive cells. Abbreviations as in Figure 1Up.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the development of atherosclerosis, macrophages play an important role in foam cell formation by taking up modified LDLs.36 37 38 39 40 Ox-LDL is one of the most plausible candidates among many suggested modified LDLs.13 14 40 In the response-to-injury theory by Ross,37 after mechanical or functional damage of vascular endothelium, expression of adhesion molecules is upregulated in the endothelium, resulting in adherence of monocytes and T cells to the endothelium and infiltration of these cells into the intima. Subsequently, monocytes differentiate to macrophages, and these macrophages take up Ox-LDL to form foam cells. Although the role of SRA in foam cell formation is well established, we have recently clarified that CD36 also plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis by taking up Ox-LDL.32 There have been several histochemical analyses on the distribution of SRA and CD36 in atherosclerotic lesions in humans,33 34 35 41 but the differential distribution of these receptors has not been clarified. In the present study, we investigated the localization, in the aorta, of both CD36 and SRA, which are 2 major scavenger receptors in humans. We found, for the first time, that these 2 receptors are differentially expressed in the atherosclerotic lesions of aorta.

First, macrophages, which were loaded with no or a small amount of lipid droplets in the aortic intima without atherosclerosis or around the core region of plaques, exhibited very weak immunoreactivity to CD36. In contrast, foam cells, which existed in the core region of plaques or mildly atherosclerotic lesions (fatty streaks), had strong immunoreactivity to CD36. In the presence of altered homeostasis, such as atherosclerosis, CD36 expression in macrophages may further be accelerated in response to a variety of inductive signals. One such inductive signal might be Ox-LDL itself.42 43 In our data, the expression of CD36 in human monocyte-derived macrophages was upregulated by Ox-LDL in vitro.44 Therefore, the current immunohistological data are consistent with the results of in vitro experiments. Although CD36 can be detected in peripheral monocytes,32 immunoreactivity to CD36 in normal intimal regions was low or absent. Huh et al44 showed both mRNA levels and total protein levels of CD36 increased during in vitro differentiation of peripheral blood monocytes into culture-derived macrophages, peaking at the early macrophage stage. This in vitro model of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation may not appear to directly correlate with our current study. In this in vitro model, monocytes-macrophages have not been exposed to any suppressive factors such as cytokines. According to our observation, interferon-{gamma} suppressed CD36 expression in human monocyte-derived macrophages.45 We speculated that after the extravasation of macrophages into the aortic wall, the expression of CD36 in tissue macrophages was concomitantly suppressed.

Concerning SRA, its expression was weakly positive in the aortic intima without atherosclerotic lesions and strongly positive around the core of atherosclerotic lesions. Matsumoto et al33 reported that SRA was distributed in the lipid-rich atherosclerotic lesions but not in the intima without atherosclerosis. Our observations on the expression of SRA may be partly similar to those reported by Matsumoto et al.33 However, these authors did not clearly mention the immunoreactivity of SRA in the core lesion nor the relationship between the extent of cholesterol accumulation and the expression of SRA. In the current study, we further demonstrated that the degree of immunoreactivity to SRA in foamed macrophages in the core lesion was relatively low compared with that for CD36. Although the sensitivities of both antibodies to detect CD36 and SRA by immunohistochemistry might be different, and undetectable levels of both proteins would be produced in macrophages with no immunoreactivity, it is apparent that these cells produce distinctly different amounts of these scavenger receptor proteins in the different portions of the aortic intima. The present results thus might suggest that the function of CD36 differs from that of SRA in the process of atherogenesis.

The expression of CD36 was also observed in foamed macrophages in fatty streaks in addition to the core region of atherosclerotic plaques. From these observations we suggest that the expression of CD36 in foam cells is not indicative of terminal atherosclerosis, but may be representative of active lipid accumulation. Wal et al41 reported that OKM5-positive macrophages were localized only in the deep layer of atheromatous plaques, and suggested that this might result from the activation of macrophages by some inflammatory processes in atherosclerotic plaques. Our observations might correspond to their findings.

As mentioned above, our most striking finding in the present study is that the major distributions of SRA and CD36 can be relatively well discriminated in atherosclerotic lesions. The distribution of lipid-laden macrophages seemed to be consistent with that of CD36-positive macrophages, rather than that of SRA-positive macrophages. These data suggest that CD36 may play a role in taking up Ox-LDL and in transforming macrophages to foam cells, especially in the late phase of plaque formation. One of the physiological roles of scavenger receptor has been thought to be removal of foreign materials or modified proteins. Because SRA was observed in normal aortic walls or around the atherosclerotic plaques, SRA might play such roles from an early phase of atherosclerosis. The expression of CD36 might be upregulated when the lipid content of atherosclerotic lesions increases. Our findings may also suggest that in CD36 deficiency, foam cells may be formed less severely than in control subjects, resulting in a reduced severity of atherosclerosis in CD36-deficient subjects. However, it may be necessary to follow up these CD36-deficient patients to properly evaluate the presence or absence of atherosclerosis. Taken together, the current study has demonstrated the differential contributions of CD36 and SRA in the development of atherosclerosis. The establishment of CD36 transgenic animal models would give us more insights into the physiological roles of CD36 in vivo.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for S.N. (grant No. 07557074) and S.Y. (grant No.08671157) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan. We thank K. Yamamori for her skillful technical assistance. We also thank T. Oh-ito in the Department of Pathology for providing us some of the tissue materials and Dr Tatsuhiko Kodama (Tokyo University) for giving us SRI-2 antibodies.

Received August 25, 1997; accepted November 6, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Steinberg D, Parthasarathy S, Carew ET, Khoo JC, Witztum JL. Beyond cholesterol: modification of low-density lipoprotein that increases its atherogenicity. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:915–924.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Palinski W, Rosenfeld ME, Yla-Herttuala S, Gurtner GC, Socher SS, Butler SW, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Steinberg D, Witztum JL. Low density lipoprotein undergoes oxidative modification in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:1372–1376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Steinbrecher UP, Parthasarathy S, Leake DS, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Modification of low density lipoprotein by endothelial cells involves lipid peroxidation and degradation of low density lipoprotein phospholipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:3883–3887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Heinecke JW, Rosen H, Chait A. Iron and copper promote modification of low density lipoprotein by human arterial smooth muscle cells in culture. J Clin Invest. 1984;74:1890–1894.
  5. Morel DW, DiCorleto PE, Chisolm GM. Endothelial and smooth muscle cells alter low density lipoprotein in vitro by free radical oxidation. Arteriosclerosis. 1984;4:357–364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cathcart MK, Morel DW, Chisolm GM III. Monocytes and neutrophils oxidize low density lipoproteins making it cytotoxic. J Leukoc Biol. 1985;38:341–350.[Abstract]
  7. Parthasarathy S, Prints DJ, Boyd D, Joy L, Steinberg D. Macrophage oxidation of low density lipoprotein generates a form recognized by the scavenger receptor. Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:505–510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Heinecke JW, Baker L, Rosen H, Chait A. Superoxide-mediated modification of low density lipoprotein by arterial smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:757–761.
  9. Steinbrecher UP. Role of superoxide in endothelial-cell modification of low density lipoproteins. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1988;959:20–30.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Mowri H, Ohkuma S, Takano T. Monoclonal DLR1a/104G antibody recognizing peroxidized lipoproteins in atherosclerotic lesions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988;963:208–214.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Yla-Herttuala S, Palinski W, Rosenfeld ME, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Butler S, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Evidence for the presence of oxidatively modified low-density lipoproteins in atherosclerotic lesions of rabbit and man. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:1086–1095.
  12. Boyd HC, Gown AM, Wolfbauer G, Chait A. Direct evidence for a protein recognized by a monoclonal antibody against oxidatively modified LDL in atherosclerotic lesions from a Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit. Am J Pathol. 1989;135:815–825.[Abstract]
  13. Carew TE, Schwenke DC, Steinberg D. Antiatherogenic effect of probucol unrelated to its hypocholesterolemic effect: evidence that antioxidants in vivo can selectively inhibit low density lipoprotein degradation in macrophage-rich fatty streaks and slow the progression of atherosclerosis in the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:7725–7729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kita T, Nagano Y, Yokode M, Ishii K, Kume N, Ooshima A, Yoshida H, Kawai C. Probucol prevents the progression of atherosclerosis in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit, an animal model for familial hypercholesterolemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:5928–5931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sasahara M, Raines EW, Chait A, Carew TE, Steinberg D, Wahl PW, Ross R. Inhibition of hypercholesterolemia-induced atherosclerosis in the nonhuman primate by probucol. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:155–164.
  16. Kodama T, Freeman M, Rohrer L, Zabrecky J, Matsudaira P, Krieger M. Type I macrophage scavenger receptor contains alpha-helical and collagen-like coiled coils. Nature. 1990;343:531–535.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Sparrow CP, Parthasarathy S, Steinberg D. A macrophage receptor that recognizes oxidized low density lipoprotein but not acetylated low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:2599–2604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Arai H, Kita T, Yokode M, Narumiya S, Kawai C. Multiple receptors for modified low density lipoproteins in mouse peritoneal macrophages: different uptake mechanisms for acetylated and oxidized low density lipoproteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;159:1375–1382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Greenwalt DE, Lipsky RH, Ockenhouse CF, Ikeda H, Tandon NN, Jamieson G. Membrane glycoprotein CD36: a review of its roles in adherence, signal transduction and transfusion medicine. Blood. 1992;80:1105–1115.[Free Full Text]
  20. Savill J, Hogg N, Ren Y, Haslett C. Thrombospondin cooperates with CD36 and the vitronectin receptor in macrophage recognition of neutrophils undergoing apoptosis. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:1513–1522.
  21. McKeown L, Vail M, Williams S, Kramer W, Hansmann K, Gralnick H. Platelet adhesion to collagen in individuals lacking glycoprotein IV. Blood. 1994;83:2866–2871.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Tandon NN, Kralisz U, Jamieson GA. Identification of glycoprotein IV (CD36) as a primary receptor for platelet-collagen adhesion. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:7576–7583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Barnwell JW, Ockenhouse CF, Knowles DM. Monoclonal antibody OKM5 inhibits the in vitro binding of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes to monocytes, endothelial, and C32 melanoma cells. J Immunol. 1985;135:3494–3497.[Abstract]
  24. Barnwell JW, Asch AS, Nachman RL, Yamaya M, Aikawa M, Ingravallo P. A human 88-kD membrane glycoprotein (CD36) functions in vitro as a receptor for a cytoadherence ligand on Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:765–772.
  25. Abumrad NA, el Maghrabi MR, Amri EZ, Lopez E, Grimaldi PA. Cloning of a rat adipocyte membrane protein implicated in binding or transport of long-chain fatty acids that is induced during preadipocyte differentiation: homology with human CD36. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:17665–17668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Harmon CM, Abumrad NA. Binding of sulfosuccinimidyl fatty acids to adipocyte membrane proteins: isolation and amino-terminal sequence of an 88-kD protein implicated in transport of long-chain fatty acids. J Membr Biol. 1993;133:43–49.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Endemann G, Stanton LW, Madden KS, Bryant CM, White RT, Protter AA. CD36 is a receptor for oxidized low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:11811–11816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kashiwagi H, Honda S, Take H, Mizutani H, Imai Y, Furubayashi T, Tomiyama Y, Kurata Y, Matsuzawa Y, Yonezawa T. Presence of the entire coding region of GP IV mRNA in Nak(a)-negative platelets. Int J Hematol. 1993;57:153–161.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Kashiwagi H, Honda S, Tomiyama Y, Mizutani H, Take H, Honda Y, Kosugi S, Kanayama Y, Kurata Y, Matsuzawa Y. A novel polymorphism in glycoprotein IV (replacement of proline-90 by serine) predominates in subjects with platelet GPIV deficiency. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69:481–484.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Kashiwagi H, Tomiyama Y, Kosugi S, Shiraga M, Lipsky RH, Kanayama Y, Kurata Y, Matsuzawa Y. Identification of molecular defects in a subject with type I CD36 deficiency. Blood. 1994;83:3545–3552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kashiwagi H, Tomiyama Y, Honda S, Kosugi S, Shiraga M, Nagao N, Sekiguchi S, Kanayama Y, Kurata Y, Matsuzawa Y. Molecular basis of CD36 deficiency: evidence that a 478C->T substitution (Proline90->Serine) in CD36 cDNA accounts for CD36 deficiency. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1040–1046.
  32. Nozaki S, Kashiwagi H, Yamashita S, Nakagawa T, Kostner B, Tomiyama Y, Nakata A, Ishigami M, Miyagawa J, Kameda-Takemura K, Kurata Y, Matsuzawa Y. Reduced uptake of oxidized low density lipoproteins in monocyte-derived macrophages from CD36-deficient subjects. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:1859–1865.
  33. Matsumoto A, Naito M, Itakura H, Ikemoto S, Asaoka H, Hayakawa I, Kanamori H, Aburatani H, Takaku F, Suzuki H, Kobari Y, Miyai T, Takahashi K, Cohen EH, Wydro R, Housman DE, Kodama T. Human macrophage scavenger receptors: primary structure, expression, and localization in atherosclerotic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:9133–9137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Naito M, Suzuki H, Mori T, Matsumoto A, Kodama T, Takahashi K. Coexpression of type I and type II human macrophage scavenger receptors in macrophages of various organs and foam cells in atherosclerotic lesions. Am J Pathol. 1992;141:591–599.[Abstract]
  35. Takahashi K, Naito M, Kodama T, Suzuki H, Mori T, Matsumoto A. Expression of macrophage scavenger receptors in various human tissues and atherosclerotic lesions. Clin Biochem. 1992;25:365–368.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Jonasson L, Holm J, Skalli O, Bondjers G, Hansson GK. Regional accumulations of T cells, macrophages, and smooth muscle cells in the human atherosclerotic plaque. Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:131–138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801–809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Rosenfeld ME, Ross R. Macrophage and smooth muscle cell proliferation in atherosclerotic lesions of WHHL and comparably hypercholesterolemic fat-fed rabbits. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:680–687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Katsuda S, Coltrera MD, Ross R, Gown AM. Human atherosclerosis. IV. Immunocytochemical analysis of cell activation and proliferation in lesions of young adults. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1787–1793.[Abstract]
  40. DiCorleto PE. Cellular mechanisms of atherogenesis. Am J Hypertens. 1993;6:314S–318S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Wal AC, Das PK, Tigges AJ, Becker AE. Macrophage differentiation in atherosclerosis: an in situ immunohistochemical analysis in humans. Am J Pathol. 1992;141:161–168.[Abstract]
  42. Han J, Hajjar DP, Febbraio M, Nicholson AC. Native and modified low density lipoproteins increase the functional expression of the macrophages class B scavenger receptor, CD36. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:21654–21659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Nagy L, Tontonoz P, Alvarez JGA, Chen H, Evans RM. Oxidized LDL regulates macrophage gene expression through ligand activation of PPAR{gamma}. Cell. 1998;93:229–240.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Huh HY, Pearce SF, Yesner LM, Schindler JL, Silverstein RL. Regulated expression of CD36 during monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation: potential role of CD36 in foam cell formation. Blood. 1996;87:2020–2028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Nakagawa T, Nozaki S, Nishida M, Yakub JM, Tomiyama Y, Nakata A, Matsumoto K, Funahashi T, Kameda-Takemura K, Kurata Y, Yamashita S, Matsuzawa Y. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein increases, and interferon-{gamma} decreases, the expression of CD36 in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18: 1350–1357.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. Densupsoontorn, Y. A. Carpentier, R. Racine, F. M. Murray, T. Seo, R. Ramakrishnan, and R. J. Deckelbaum
CD36 and Proteoglycan-Mediated Pathways for (n-3) Fatty Acid Enriched Triglyceride-Rich Particle Blood Clearance in Mouse Models In Vivo and in Peritoneal Macrophages In Vitro
J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 257 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Martin-Fuentes, F. Civeira, D. Recalde, A. L. Garcia-Otin, E. Jarauta, I. Marzo, and A. Cenarro
Individual Variation of Scavenger Receptor Expression in Human Macrophages with Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Is Associated with a Differential Inflammatory Response
J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 3242 - 3248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. F. Kwok, C.-C. Juan, and L.-T. Ho
Endothelin-1 decreases CD36 protein expression in vascular smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2007; 292(2): E648 - E652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Avallone, A. Demers, A. Rodrigue-Way, K. Bujold, D. Harb, S. Anghel, W. Wahli, S. Marleau, H. Ong, and A. Tremblay
A Growth Hormone-Releasing Peptide that Binds Scavenger Receptor CD36 and Ghrelin Receptor Up-Regulates Sterol Transporters and Cholesterol Efflux in Macrophages through a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Dependent Pathway
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 20(12): 3165 - 3178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Gao, R. Zhang, M. E. Greenberg, M. Sun, X. Chen, B. S. Levison, R. G. Salomon, and S. L. Hazen
Phospholipid Hydroxyalkenals, a Subset of Recently Discovered Endogenous CD36 Ligands, Spontaneously Generate Novel Furan-containing Phospholipids Lacking CD36 Binding Activity in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem., October 20, 2006; 281(42): 31298 - 31308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Handberg, K. Levin, K. Hojlund, and H. Beck-Nielsen
Identification of the Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Scavenger Receptor CD36 in Plasma: A Novel Marker of Insulin Resistance
Circulation, September 12, 2006; 114(11): 1169 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Munteanu, M. Taddei, I. Tamburini, E. Bergamini, A. Azzi, and J.-M. Zingg
Antagonistic Effects of Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein and {alpha}-Tocopherol on CD36 Scavenger Receptor Expression in Monocytes: INVOLVEMENT OF PROTEIN KINASE B AND PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR-{gamma}
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2006; 281(10): 6489 - 6497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Q. Cai, L. Lanting, and R. Natarajan
Interaction of Monocytes With Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Regulates Monocyte Survival and Differentiation Through Distinct Pathways
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2004; 24(12): 2263 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. S. Antonov, F. D. Kolodgie, D. H. Munn, and R. G. Gerrity
Regulation of Macrophage Foam Cell Formation by {alpha}V{beta}3 Integrin: Potential Role in Human Atherosclerosis
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2004; 165(1): 247 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. D. Brown, L. Jin, M.-L. Jien, A. H. Matsumoto, G. A. Helm, A. J. Lusis, J. S. Frank, and W. Shi
Lipid retention in the arterial wall of two mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1155 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
B. OSTERUD and E. BJORKLID
Role of Monocytes in Atherogenesis
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2003; 83(4): 1069 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. A. Podrez, E. Poliakov, Z. Shen, R. Zhang, Y. Deng, M. Sun, P. J. Finton, L. Shan, B. Gugiu, P. L. Fox, et al.
Identification of a Novel Family of Oxidized Phospholipids That Serve as Ligands for the Macrophage Scavenger Receptor CD36
J. Biol. Chem., October 4, 2002; 277(41): 38503 - 38516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Y. Wada, A. Sugiyama, T. Yamamoto, M. Naito, N. Noguchi, S. Yokoyama, M. Tsujita, Y. Kawabe, M. Kobayashi, A. Izumi, et al.
Lipid Accumulation in Smooth Muscle Cells Under LDL Loading Is Independent of LDL Receptor Pathway and Enhanced by Hypoxic Conditions
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2002; 22(10): 1712 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J.-M. Zingg, R. Ricciarelli, E. Andorno, and A. Azzi
Novel 5' Exon of Scavenger Receptor CD36 Is Expressed in Cultured Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Atherosclerotic Plaques
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2002; 22(3): 412 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
A. C. NICHOLSON, J. HAN, M. FEBBRAIO, R. L. SILVERSTERIN, and D. P. HAJJAR
Role of CD36, the Macrophage Class B Scavenger Receptor, in Atherosclerosis
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2001; 947(1): 224 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. S. Major, D. E. Dove, H. Ishiguro, Y. R. Su, A. M. Brown, L. Liu, K. J. Carter, M. F. Linton, and S. Fazio
Increased Cholesterol Efflux in Apolipoprotein AI (ApoAI)-Producing Macrophages as a Mechanism for Reduced Atherosclerosis in ApoAI(-/-) Mice
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2001; 21(11): 1790 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Minami, N. Kume, T. Shimaoka, H. Kataoka, K. Hayashida, Y. Akiyama, I. Nagata, K. Ando, M. Nobuyoshi, M. Hanyuu, et al.
Expression of SR-PSOX, a Novel Cell-Surface Scavenger Receptor for Phosphatidylserine and Oxidized LDL in Human Atherosclerotic Lesions
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2001; 21(11): 1796 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Keidar, R. Heinrich, M. Kaplan, T. Hayek, and M. Aviram
Angiotensin II Administration to Atherosclerotic Mice Increases Macrophage Uptake of Oxidized LDL: A Possible Role for Interleukin-6
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2001; 21(9): 1464 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Devaraj, I. Hugou, and I. Jialal
{{alpha}}-Tocopherol decreases CD36 expression in human monocyte-derived macrophages
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2001; 42(4): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text]