Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999;19:854-861

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999;19:854-861.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Modified LDL–Mediated Increases in Endothelial Layer Permeability Are Attenuated With 17ß-Estradiol

Gerrie Gardner; Carole L. Banka; Kim A. Roberts; Adam E. Mullick; John C. Rutledge

From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Davis (G.G., K.A.R., A.E.M., J.C.R.), and The Scripps Research Institute (C.L.B.), La Jolla, Calif.

Correspondence to John C. Rutledge, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, One Sheilds Drive, TB 172, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail jcrutledge{at}ucdavis.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Current research suggests that estrogen may have primary effects on the artery wall. To investigate the mechanisms of female sex hormone actions in the artery wall, we used an isolated, perfused, rat carotid artery model to examine the effects of estradiol on the rates of accumulation of normal (N-LDL) and minimally modified (MM-LDL) low density lipoprotein in ovariectomized rats. N-LDL, MM-LDL, and oxidized LDL (OX-LDL) were fluorescently labeled and perfused into individual arteries. The rate of LDL accumulation was measured by quantitative fluorescence microscopy before and after treatment with estradiol (1 nmol/L, 272 pg/mL). Estradiol had no effect on the rate of N-LDL accumulation (45±12 versus 48±15 ng cholesterol per cm2 per h). However, estradiol significantly decreased the rate of MM-LDL (240±48 versus 160±48 ng cholesterol per cm2 per h; P<0.05) and OX-LDL (191±53 versus 112±36 ng cholesterol per cm2 per h; P<0.05) accumulation. Further experiments showed that perfusion of unlabeled MM-LDL (100 µg/mL) increased endothelial layer permeability when the rate of accumulation of a water-soluble, fluorescently labeled, reference molecule (64 000–molecular weight dextran) was determined before and after perfusion of MM-LDL (319±96 versus 510±191 ng per cm2 per h, n=6 arteries; P<0.05). Estradiol prevented the expected increase in the rate of dextran accumulation when perfused with MM-LDL (control, 415±49 ng per cm2 per h and MM-LDL+estradiol, 415±160 ng per cm2 per h). Our studies show that estradiol prevents compromise of the endothelial barrier mediated by MM-LDL and attenuates accumulation of MM-LDL in the artery wall.


Key Words: artery • arteriosclerosis • LDL • estrogen • oxidized LDL • endothelium • permeability


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Acardinal characteristic of the development of atherosclerosis is the accumulation of LDL within the arterial wall.1 2 3 Sites of relative increase in LDL permeability have been identified in normal arteries4 and can be induced by injury to the endothelium.5 6 7 8 9 Alternatively, others have reported increased binding and decreased efflux of LDL from the vascular wall, even under conditions where LDL influx was not affected.10 11 Therefore, LDL accumulation in the artery wall potentially occurs by several mechanisms, perhaps depending on the stage of atheroma formation.

A large body of evidence indicates that modification of LDL in the artery wall promotes atherosclerosis.12 Recent studies demonstrate evidence of modification of LDL in the blood.13 14 15 16 17 Furthermore, a previous study showed increased accumulation and degradation of oxidized LDL (OX-LDL) in the artery wall in vivo.18 These studies suggest that the reason there is increased accumulation and degradation of OX-LDL is because arterial permeability to undegraded, OX-LDL is greater than arterial permeability to native LDL (N-LDL). However, the precise mechanism(s) by which modified LDL (MM-LDL) affects LDL flux in the artery wall, such as increases in permeability to LDL, remains incompletely understood.

Modification of LDL (eg, oxidation), either in the circulation or the artery wall, could promote atherosclerosis by increasing LDL accumulation in the artery. Also, alteration of constituents of the artery wall, such as proteoglycans, could influence LDL binding to the artery wall. Furthermore, oxidant-mediated injury of endothelial cell membranes could compromise the endothelial layer barrier to macromolecules in arteries.5 To counteract oxidant stress effects on LDL and/or the artery wall, a number of potential antioxidants have been examined. In particular, some estrogens (eg, 17ß-estradiol) are known to reduce LDL accumulation in the artery wall19 20 and to be potent antioxidants.21 22 23 In addition, estrogens may protect endothelial cells from oxidative damage.21 22 This action would be expected to prevent increased LDL permeation into the artery wall. Furthermore, estradiol has been shown to inhibit LDL oxidation in vivo at supraphysiological24 and physiological25 concentrations. These data suggest that some estrogens may beneficially affect LDL or the artery wall by their antioxidant effects.

To examine the interactions of MM-LDL and estradiol in the artery wall, we developed a system to perfuse individual arteries with N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL and to test the actions of estradiol on LDL flux in the artery wall. Our results show greater accumulation of MM-LDL than N-LDL. Furthermore, estradiol decreased accumulation of both MM-LDL and OX-LDL and prevented compromise of endothelial layer integrity induced by MM-LDL.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Chemicals and Materials
Krebs-Henseleit buffer consisted of (in mmol/L) NaCl 116, KCl 5, CaCl2 1.2, NH2PO4 1.2, and glucose 11. 17ß-Estradiol (No. 125H1081) and EDTA were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. Low-endotoxin Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium was prepared in The Scripps Research Institute media kitchen.

Experimental Animals
Female Crl:CD® (SD) BR rats (100 to 150 g) obtained from Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Boston, Ma) were used in all experiments. Animals were individually housed in plastic cages with a stainless steel cover. They were given tap water and Purina Laboratory Rodent Chow ad libitum. The animal housing facility and experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Use Committee at the University of California at Davis.

Ovariectomy Surgery
Rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). A 0.5- to 1.0-cm longitudinal incision was made in the midline dorsal area of the back from the second to the fifth lumbar vertebrae.26 A small peritoneal incision was made and the ovaries were located. Once the ovaries were tied off at the tip of the uterus, they were removed. Vexaband tissue glue and sutures (absorbable 3-0, Dexon II) were used to close the incisions. Animals were given an intramuscular injection of an antibiotic (enrofloxicine, 10 mg/kg) and placed on a heating pad until they recovered.

Isolation and Modification of LDLs
Human blood was collected in citrate from healthy male donors at the San Diego Blood Bank. LDL was isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation and was stored in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 0.3 mmol/L EDTA.27 Immediately before oxidation, antioxidants were removed from LDL by overnight dialysis against saline. Lipoproteins were modified by incubating LDL (2.5 mg protein per mL) with 5 µmol/L copper acetate (Cu2+), and the extent of modification was measured by thiobarbiturate-reactive substances (TBARS).27 28 MM-LDL (TBARS=2.4 to 6.8 nmol malondialdehyde equivalent s per mg protein) was obtained by incubating human N-LDL with Cu2+ for 1 hour, and the OX-LDL (TBARS=7.5 to 32.7 nmol/mg) was obtained by incubating N-LDL with Cu2+ for 18 hours. In comparison, N-LDL had TBARS values of 0.00 to 1.71 nmol malondialdehyde equivalents per mg protein. N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL used in a given protocol were from the same male donor. Each of the protocols was conducted with LDL from a different donor.

Fluorescent Labeling of LDL and Dextran
N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL were labeled with the fluorescent hydrocarbon probe 1,1-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine (DiI) as described by Pitas et al.29 Dil exchanges with lipoprotein phospholipid and does not transfer the fluorescent probe because the 2 octadecyl moieties make the compound hydrophobic. The spectral properties of Dil are the following: excitation maximum at 540 nm and emission maximum at 556 nm. Dextran (64 000 molecular weight) was obtained from Sigma labeled with TRITC. The spectral properties of TRITC are excitation maximum at 554 nm and emission maximum at 573 nm.

Experimental Protocol
Four to 6 weeks after ovariectomy, the arterial perfusion experiments were performed.6 30 Rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (35 mg/kg). After the rat was anesthetized, a midline incision was made in the neck, and both carotid arteries were dissected free from connective tissue. An incision was made in the proximal segment of the artery, and a cannula (23-gauge tubing adapter connected to polyethylene-50 tubing) was inserted into the carotid artery. The cannula was tied in place (silk 6-0). Another incision was made in the distal portion of the artery proximal to the bifurcation of the internal and external carotid arteries. Another cannula (identical to the proximal cannula) was inserted into the distal carotid artery and tied in place. The artery was removed from the animal and placed into a fluid-filled, clear Plexiglas chamber on the microscope stage (perfusion chamber). Throughout the surgery, the artery was superfused with Krebs-Henseleit solution gassed with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The Krebs-Henseleit solution traveled from a reservoir through a heating coil to the superfusate chamber and was maintained at 37°C throughout the experiment.

To reduce the number of animals needed for these experiments, both carotid arteries were isolated and used for perfusion. A single experiment was performed on each artery, and protocols were performed in sequence. For example, in protocol 1 the rates of LDL accumulation for N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL were performed in 3 sequential arteries (2 carotid arteries from 1 animal and 1 carotid artery from the second animal). The sequence began again with the second carotid artery from the second animal.

The artery was perfused with Krebs-Henseleit solution containing 1% BSA (perfusate solution), also gassed with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The perfusate solution entered the artery through the proximal cannula and exited the artery through the distal cannula. By using 3-way stopcocks and 2 parallel sets of tubing, the artery was perfused with either the nonfluorescent solution or the fluorescent solution. The arteries were perfused antegradely by a peristaltic pump. A normal flow rate was maintained in the carotid artery (7 mL/min). Periodic measurements of pH and partial pressures of O2 and CO2 were obtained to maintain physiological conditions.

Experimental Apparatus
The experimental apparatus used to measure LDL flux consisted of an inverted Nikon microscope with objective (planx6.3; numerical aperture, 0.2) mounted on the microscope head. The fluorescence image was transmitted through a beam splitter to a Dage low-light television camera and a Nikon P101 photometer. The photometer used to measure changes in fluorescence intensity was connected to a chart recorder and computer. Output from the camera was input into the videocassette recorder and to a high-resolution monitor. Images of the labeled LDL flux were recorded on videotape and assessed later by image analysis.31

Measurement of LDL Accumulation and Lumen Volume
Several measurements were made during and after perfusion of each carotid artery with fluorescently labeled molecules. Initially, a baseline measurement of fluorescence intensity (If) was established while the artery was perfused with the nonfluorescent solution (Figure 1Down). Then, the artery was perfused with the fluorescent solution, and a step increase in fluorescence intensity was observed. Fluorescence intensity rapidly increased to approach an asymptotic value (If0). Simultaneously, LDL may become associated with the luminal surface of the artery or enter the artery wall. If the perfusate concentration of the fluorescently labeled molecules and perfusate flow remain constant, then If0 determined at the asymptotic value estimated the lumen volume.30 As the artery continued to be perfused with fluorescent solution, some of the labeled molecules became bound to the endothelium and/or crossed into the artery wall. After washout with the nonfluorescent solution, labeled molecules that remained on the luminal surface or in the artery wall were termed If accumulation. Therefore, molecule accumulation in the artery wall was determined photometrically (in millivolts) and was a measure of the number of fluorescent molecules that remained on the lumen surface or in the artery wall.6 The rate of molecule accumulation is If accumulation divided by perfusion time. Using this approach, we were able to measure If accumulation multiple times (Figure 2Down). Furthermore, the effect of estradiol can be determined by adding estradiol to both the fluorescent and nonfluorescent solutions after control rates of If accumulation have been determined.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Perfusion of N-LDL and MM-LDL into individual arteries. For N-LDL during perfusion with the nonfluorescent solution, a baseline level of fluorescence intensity was determined. Then, the artery was perfused with buffer solution containing the fluorescently labeled N-LDL (DiI–N-LDL) causing a stepwise increase in fluorescence intensity (If0). {wedge}Indicates initiation of perfusion of the fluorescently labeled LDL solution. Then, the artery was perfused with the nonfluorescent buffer solution again. Little or no fluorescent N-LDL remained in the artery wall after the washout with the nonfluorescent solution. For MM-LDL during perfusion with the solution containing fluorescently labeled MM-LDL, increased fluorescence intensity was observed with time, indicating increased accumulation of MM-LDL on or in the artery wall. After washout of the artery with the nonfluorescent solution, a residual increase in fluorescence intensity above baseline was observed (If accumulation). This represents the MM-LDL that accumulated in the artery wall and on the intimal surface over the time of perfusion with the fluorescently labeled MM-LDL.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the sequence of perfusions with the nonfluorescent buffer solution or the buffer solution containing the fluorescently labeled LDL (DiI–N-LDL, DiI–MM-LDL, or DiI–OX-LDL) in protocol 1. A total of 5 perfusions of the fluorescently labeled LDL solutions were performed in each artery. Therefore, 5 measurements of the rates of N-LDL, MM-LDL, or OX-LDL were performed in each artery.

To relate fluorescence intensity (If) to lumen volume, we determined the fluorescence intensity of a given amount of LDL in the artery lumen. The volume of the artery was determined by {pi} · radius2 · length. Thus, fluorescence intensity in the lumen can be related to units of volume to indirectly measure artery lumen volume.

Accumulation (If) in millivolts was converted to nanograms of cholesterol per square centimeter per hour as we have described previously.32 In summary, we assume the relationship

For a given perfusion of DiI-LDL, If accumulation and If0 are determined photometrically, and lumen LDL cholesterol is calculated by determining lumen volume and the concentration of LDL cholesterol in the perfusate. Then, artery wall LDL cholesterol is calculated. After the endothelial surface area has been determined, the rate of LDL cholesterol per unit of endothelial surface area per unit time (nanograms per square centimeter per hour) can be determined.

The rates of DiI–N-LDL, DiI–MM-LDL, and DiI–OX-LDL efflux were determined, as we have described previously.6 In summary, the rate of decay of fluorescence intensity was determined after the fluorescently labeled LDL solution was washed from the vessel lumen. The decay in fluorescence then represents the efflux of LDL back into the artery lumen.

Plasma Estradiol Measurements
After isolation and cannulation of the carotid artery, blood was collected from each animal via the right atrium by using a 22-gauge needle and heparinized syringe. Blood was transferred to evacuated containers and centrifuged (2800 rpm for 10 minutes). Plasma was immediately separated from red blood cells and kept on ice. The samples were sent to the Endocrinology Laboratory of the School of Veterinary Medicine at the University of California at Davis for analysis of estradiol concentration by using a charcoal-based, tritium-labeled radioimmunoassay.33 The mean plasma estradiol level 4 to 6 weeks after ovariectomy was 11.2±1.4 pg/mL.

Statistical Analysis
Multiple measurements of the rate of LDL accumulation and lumen volume were made from each artery for each treatment. To give each artery and each treatment equal weight, the mean of all measurements of the rates of LDL accumulation and lumen volume were determined for each treatment in each artery. Group data of each treatment are presented as the mean±SEM. Group data were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA (Sigma Stat statistical hardware, Jandel Corp). Significant effects were assessed with the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison test. A probability level of P<=0.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Accumulation of N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL in the Artery Wall: Protocol 1
N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL were labeled with DiI. Individual arteries were perfused with DiI–N-LDL (4 arteries), DiI–MM-LDL (4 arteries), or DiI–OX-LDL (4 arteries). The concentration of all fluorescently labeled LDL solutions was 0.042 mg/mL protein and 0.083 mg/mL cholesterol. In each artery, a baseline level of fluorescence intensity was determined by perfusing the artery with the nonfluorescent buffer solution (Figure 1Up). Then, fluorescently labeled LDL was perfused for 10 minutes, followed by a 10-minute perfusion with nonfluorescent perfusate. The rate of LDL accumulation was determined after each 10-minute perfusion with fluorescently labeled LDL. Each artery had the rate of LDL accumulation determined 5 times (Figure 2Up). There was a significant increase in the rate of LDL accumulation during perfusion with MM-LDL and OX-LDL (175±32 and 178±5 ng cholesterol per cm2 per h, respectively) compared with N-LDL (64±16 ng cholesterol per cm2 per h; P<0.001; Figures 1Up, 3Down, and 4Down and TableDown, protocol 1). Increased MM-LDL and OX-LDL accumulation was apparent with the first perfusion of MM-LDL and OX-LDL and remained elevated for the duration of the experiment. No trend was noted toward increased MM-LDL or OX-LDL accumulation with time.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Perfused-artery preparation, with images from arteries perfused with N-LDL and MM-LDL. Example of a section of the rat carotid artery viewed with transmitted light. The diameter of the artery was {approx}1 mm. An artery was perfused with buffer solution containing N-LDL labeled with DiI. The buffer solution containing DiI–N-LDL was washed out with the nonfluorescent buffer solution. Fluorescence that remained was the amount of N-LDL that accumulated in the artery wall and on the intimal surface. Another artery was perfused with MM-LDL, also labeled with DiI, under the same optical conditions. Significantly more DiI–MM-LDL than DiI–N-LDL accumulated in the artery wall. (Magnification x30.)



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Group data showing the rates of N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL accumulation. Bars represent mean±SEM for the rates of LDL accumulation for arteries perfused with N-LDL, MM-LDL, or OX-LDL (n=4 arteries in each group). The rates of accumulation of MM-LDL and OX-LDL were significantly greater than that of N-LDL: a=P<0.05.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Treatment Protocols for Perfusion of Rat Arteries

Effect of Estradiol on N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL Flux in the Artery Wall: Protocol 2
Fluorescently labeled N-LDL, MM-LDL, or OX-LDL was perfused into separate arteries (N-LDL, n=8 arteries; MM-LDL, n=10 arteries; or OX-LDL, n=10 arteries) in the same concentrations as described above. Two arteries (N-LDL) developed leaks and were therefore technically unacceptable. In each artery, the rate of N-LDL, MM-LDL, or OX-LDL accumulation was determined. Then, while the nonfluorescent Krebs-Henseleit solution was being perfused, estradiol (1 nmol/L, 272 pg/mL) was added to both the nonfluorescent and fluorescent perfusion solutions (Figure 5Down). Estradiol was solubilized in ethanol and diluted in Krebs-Henseleit buffer to its final concentration (0.000020% ethanol by volume). This concentration of estradiol has been shown not to affect the rate of LDL accumulation in the artery wall in short-term studies.32



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Summary of the sequence of perfusions of the nonfluorescent buffer solution and the buffer solutions containing the fluorescently labeled LDL. In protocol 2 and using the same format as described in protocol 1 (Figure 2Up), the sequence of perfusions of the nonfluorescent buffer solution and the fluorescently labeled LDL solutions (DiI–N-LDL, DiI–MM-LDL, or DiI–OX-LDL) is depicted. Estradiol (272 pg/mL) was added to both nonfluorescent and fluorescent solutions after 3 perfusion of the fluorescent solution. For protocol 3, scheme of the sequence of perfusions is shown for the nonfluorescent buffer solution and the buffer solution containing TRITC-dextran (75 µg/mL). MM-LDL (not fluorescently labeled) was added to the nonfluorescent solution after 3 perfusions of the solution containing TRITC-dextran. For protocol 4, sequence of perfusion is shown for the nonfluorescent buffer solution and the solution containing TRITC-dextran. Estradiol (272 pg/mL) was added after two 10-minute perfusions with TRITC-dextran. MM-LDL (100 µg/mL) was added to the nonfluorescent solution after 4 perfusions of TRITC-dextran.

After estradiol was added to both the nonfluorescent and the fluorescently labeled LDL solutions, the artery was perfused for 10 minutes with the nonfluorescent solution. Then, the artery was perfused with the fluorescently labeled LDL solution for 10 minutes. Therefore, each artery was treated with estradiol for 20 minutes before the first measurements of the rates of accumulation of N-LDL, MM-LDL, or OX-LDL were made. As in the previous protocol, the rates of OX-LDL and MM-LDL accumulation were significantly greater than that of N-LDL accumulation. Furthermore, the rate of MM-LDL accumulation tended to be greater than that of OX-LDL accumulation. The rate of N-LDL accumulation (45±12 ng per cm2 per h) was not changed after estradiol was added (48±15 ng per cm2 per h; Figure 6Down). There was, however, a significant decrease in MM-LDL accumulation after the addition of estradiol to the perfusate (240±48 versus 160±48 ng per cm2 per h; P<0.05). The rate of accumulation of OX-LDL was 191±53 ng per cm2 per h. Addition of estradiol significantly decreased OX-LDL accumulation (112±36 ng per cm2 per h; P<0.05).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of estradiol on rates of N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL accumulation. In each artery the accumulation rate of N-LDL, MM-LDL, or OX-LDL was determined. Then, estradiol (E2, 272 pg/mL) was added to the perfusate. Pairs of bar graphs represent the mean±SEM for arteries perfused with N-LDL (n=8 arteries), MM-LDL (n=10 arteries), or OX-LDL (n=10 arteries) before and after estradiol treatment. The rate of MM-LDL accumulation was significantly greater than that of N-LDL (a). OX-LDL accumulation was also greater than that of N-LDL (b). Addition of estradiol to N-LDL did not significantly change the rate of N-LDL accumulation. However, estradiol significantly reduced the rates of MM-LDL (c) and OX-LDL (d) accumulation. a, b,c, d: P<0.05 vs without E2.

The rates of DiI–N-LDL, DiI–MM-LDL, and DiI–OX-LDL efflux were determined in these same arteries. The rates of efflux before and after addition of estradiol to the perfusate were as follows: N-LDL, 139±33.6 and 175±55 ng per cm2 per h; MM-LDL, 28.6±7.6 and 31±10 ng per cm2 per h; and OX-LDL, 33±9 and 44±14 ng per cm2 per. The rate of N-LDL efflux was significantly greater than that of MM-LDL or OX-LDL. No differences in rates of efflux were noted before and after addition of estradiol to perfusions containing N-LDL, MM-LDL, and OX-LDL.

Estradiol did not significantly change lumen volume when the artery was treated with N-LDL, MM-LDL, or OX-LDL. For example, when the concentration of the N-LDL solution was 0.042 mg protein per mL, the volume of the artery contained within the measuring window was 9.4 µL, and the fluorescence intensity was 57 mV when the vessel lumen volume was filled with DiI–N-LDL, then each millivolt represented {approx}0.17 µL. Therefore, during perfusion with N-LDL, estradiol increased the lumen volume from 9.4 µL to only 10.2 µL.

Effects of MM-LDL on Endothelial Layer Permeability: Protocol 3
To determine the effect of MM-LDL on endothelial layer permeability, we perfused the arteries with nonfluorescently labeled MM-LDL at a concentration range of 10 to 350 µg/mL protein. Endothelial layer permeability after perfusion with MM-LDL was determined by measurement of accumulation of a nonlipid, water-soluble reference molecule (dextran, 64 000 molecular weight, at 75 µg/mL and labeled with TRITC). Significant increases in the rates of dextran accumulation were first detected after perfusion with 100 µg/mL MM-LDL (319±96 versus 510±191 ng per cm2 per h; n=6 arteries; P<0.05). As in an in vivo control, we conducted a whole-animal perfusion and showed that MM-LDL did, in fact, accumulate in the carotid artery (Figure 7Down).



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. In vivo accumulation of MM-LDL. The right external jugular vein of an ovariectomized rat was isolated and cannulated. DiI–MM-LDL was perfused into the vein to a concentration of 100 µg/mL and assuming no clearance of MM-LDL. After a 1-hour perfusion, the right carotid artery was isolated, cannulated, placed in the circulatory loop, and imaged under the fluorescence microscope. An artery treated identically, but not perfused with DiI–MM-LDL, is also shown. Fluorescence intensity increased, indicating that the accumulation of MM-LDL in perfused arteries also was seen in an in vivo model.

To compare the effect of MM-LDL on endothelial layer permeability with other lipoproteins, we perfused arteries with nonfluorescently labeled HDL (0.2 mg/mL protein, 0.16 mg/mL cholesterol). No increase in the rate of dextran accumulation was noted after the artery wall was perfused with HDL (447 versus 383 ng cholesterol per cm2 per h; n=2 arteries).

Impact of Estradiol on MM-LDL–Mediated Dextran Accumulation: Protocol 4
Next, we determined the effect of treatment of the artery with estradiol on the rate of dextran accumulation before and after perfusion with MM-LDL (100 µg/mL). In each artery (n=6), the rate of dextran accumulation was determined during perfusion of the solution containing TRITC-labeled dextran (415±49 ng per cm2 per h). Then, estradiol (272 pg/mL) was added to both the fluorescent and nonfluorescent solutions, and repeated measurements of the rate of dextran accumulation were made (479±85 ng per cm2 per h). The rate of dextran accumulation after estradiol was added to the perfusate was not significantly different from control measurements. Then, MM-LDL (100 µg/mL) was added to the nonfluorescent solution, and repeated measurements of the rate of dextran accumulation after MM-LDL exposure were made in the presence of estradiol (415±160 ng per cm2 per h). Treatment of the artery with estradiol prevented the expected increase in the rate of dextran accumulation when perfused with MM-LDL. Thus, treatment with estradiol prevented MM-LDL–mediated compromise of the endothelial barrier function.

To determine the effects of N-LDL on estradiol interactions with MM-LDL, we performed additional control experiments. First, we measured the rate of dextran accumulation (240±18.2 ng per cm2 per h) in the presence of N-LDL (100 µg/mL). Then, we added MM-LDL (100 µg/mL) to the perfusate and again measured the rate of dextran accumulation with N-LDL in the perfusate (318±17.3 ng per cm2 per h; a 32.5% increase in the rate of dextran accumulation). The other carotid artery from the same animal also was used. Initially, we measured the rate of dextran accumulation in the presence of N-LDL and estradiol (at the same concentrations; 324±3.6 ng per cm2 per h). Next, MM-LDL was added to the perfusate, and the rate of dextran accumulation was determined in the presence of N-LDL and estradiol (348±81 ng per cm2 per h; a 7.4% increase in dextran accumulation). These experiments also showed that MM-LDL increased endothelial layer permeability and that estradiol reduced compromise of the endothelial layer in the presence of N-LDL.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our study showed that estradiol attenuated the accumulation of MM-LDL in the walls of isolated, perfused, rat carotid arteries. Accumulation of MM-LDL and OX-LDL decreased when estradiol was added to the perfusate. Perfusion of MM-LDL increased the accumulation of fluorescently labeled dextran, a marker of increased endothelial layer permeability. The effect of MM-LDL on endothelial layer permeability was nullified by addition of estradiol to the perfusate and indicates that the protective effects of estradiol on the artery wall are mediated, in part, by attenuation of MM-LDL–induced endothelial cell injury.

The interactions of ovarian sex hormones with the artery wall are complex and multifaceted. Physiological concentrations of estrogens have been shown to act directly on the artery wall,32 34 to attenuate atherosclerosis,35 and to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women.36 In comparison, supraphysiolgical concentrations of some estrogens (for example, 17ß-estradiol) can increase LDL accumulation in the artery wall.32 However, the mechanisms by which estrogens affect the interaction of MM-LDL with the artery wall are incompletely understood and were, therefore, the subject of this article.

To study the interactions of MM-LDL with the artery wall, we used the most direct method possible, by perfusing MM-LDL into the lumen of the artery. This approach is advantageous because it allowed us to directly perfuse a known amount of modified LDL into the artery and analyze the interactions of MM-LDL with the artery wall. This approach enabled us to precisely manipulate the compositions of the perfusate and superfusate solutions and carefully control arterial flow and hydrostatic pressure, hemodynamic parameters known to influence LDL flux into the artery wall.7 8 37 The approach that we have taken enabled us to study the mechanisms of LDL flux into the artery wall and is a bridge between previous in vitro and cell culture experiments and experiments performed on whole-animal preparations.5 18 38

The literature suggests that LDL is primarily modified in the arterial wall because of the large antioxidant capacity of the blood.39 However, recent data show that modification of LDL can occur in the blood.13 14 15 16 17 Furthermore, prolonged LDL circulation times in the blood increase LDL's propensity to oxidation and may lead to LDL modification before it enters the artery wall.40 Previous work from this laboratory showed that even short exposures to environmental tobacco smoke (4 hours) increased LDL accumulation in the artery wall. This effect appears to be related to modification of LDL by the products of environmental tobacco smoke, a process that may occur in blood.30

We saw a tendency for MM-LDL to accumulate in the artery wall to a greater extent than did OX-LDL. This could result from a number of possible mechanisms, including induction of substances that increase endothelial layer permeability, such as cytokines (eg, tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}). Also, this interaction could be related to greater oxidative proteolysis of apoB during a longer duration of copper-mediated oxidation of LDL. Previous studies showed high-avidity binding of constituents of apoB (eg, apoB17) with matrix molecules of the artery wall, such as heparan sulfate proteoglycans.41 Extensive oxidation of LDL (ie, OX-LDL) may eliminate the exposed portions of apoB on LDL.27 These studies imply that constituents of apoB are important or necessary for the interaction of LDL with the artery wall.

Researchers from a number of laboratories have investigated the potential antioxidant effects of estrogens. Maziere et al21 found that 17ß-estradiol, estriol, and estrone inhibited LDL oxidation. Also, pretreatment of endothelial cells and monocyte-like cells with estradiol 24 hours before exposure to OX-LDL prevented cytotoxic effects associated with Ox-LDL. In a similar study, Negre-Salvayre et al22 reported that estradiol protected cultured bovine endothelial cells from cytotoxic effects of MM-LDL. However, testosterone, progesterone, and cholesterol had no protective effects. Huber et al42 and Maziere et al21 reported that estrogens inhibited LDL oxidation and the accumulation of cholesteryl esters in macrophages. Furthermore, in perfused arteries, estradiol was shown to reduce oxidant stress mediated by tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}.43 Therefore, a considerable body of data indicates significant antioxidant effects associated with estrogens.

In our experiments, LDL was already modified when perfused into the arteries. Although estradiol could prevent further modification of LDL in the artery, a primary artery wall effect was suggested. Our studies showed that MM-LDL increased endothelial layer permeability, suggesting endothelial cell injury. Estradiol appeared to prevent this action. We speculate that estradiol partitioned into endothelial cell plasma membranes and stabilized the membranes, possibly by preventing lipid peroxidation or by altering fluidity.21 The antioxidant properties of estradiol defended endothelial cells from MM-LDL–mediated oxidant stress. Thus, estradiol stabilized the plasma membrane and maintained endothelial layer integrity.

Our studies demonstrated that not only did MM- and OX-LDL accumulate to a greater extent in the artery than did N-LDL but also that their rate of efflux was reduced. This latter effect suggests increased binding of MM- and OX -LDL once they entered the artery wall. Therefore, although increased endothelial layer permeability appeared to be the primary action of MM- and OX-LDL on the vessel wall in these studies, increased binding of MM- and OX-LDL to the artery wall also could play a role in total LDL accumulation. However, increased binding, as measured by the rate of efflux, was not prevented by estradiol, as was the increased endothelial layer permeability.

Conclusions
This study and others indicate that an important effect of estradiol treatment is protection of the artery wall from MM-LDL–mediated injury. Mechanistically, estradiol prevented MM-LDL–mediated injury. Although estradiol is likely to have multiple protective effects to prevent atherosclerosis, our study shows that some of the actions of MM-LDL can be ameliorated with estradiol. Because MM-LDL appears to play a critical role in the development of atheroma, hormone replacement therapies may mediate some of LDL's detrimental effects by the antioxidant properties associated with estrogens.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This project was supported by National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Md) grants HL-55667 (to Dr Rutledge) and HL-50060 and HL-55517 (to Dr Banka). We wish to thank Mable Woo for her careful technical support in this project and Jeannette Peacock for her secretarial assistance.

Received October 8, 1997; accepted August 5, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Hoff HF, Jackson RL, Titus JL, De Bakey ME, Gotto Jr AM. Plasma lipoproteins and atherosclerosis in man: an immunohistochemical study. Cardiovasc Res Center Bull. 1973;12:29–39.

2. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Lipoprotein receptors, cholesterol metabolism, and atherosclerosis. Arch Pathol. 1975;99:181–184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Heinecke JW. Mechanisms of oxidative damage of low density lipoprotein in human atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1997;8:268–274.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Herrmann RA, Malinauskas RA, Truskey GA. Characterization of sites with elevated LDL permeability at intercostal, celiac, and iliac branches of the normal rabbit aorta. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:313–323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Rangaswamy S, Penn MS, Saidel GM, Chisolm GM. Exogenous oxidized low-density lipoprotein injures and alters the barrier function of endothelium in rats in vivo. Circ Res. 1997;80:37–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Rutledge JC, Woo MM, Rezai AA, Curtiss LK, Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase increases lipoprotein binding to the artery wall and increases endothelial layer permeability by formation of lipolysis products. Circ Res. 1997;80:819–828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Nielsen LB, Nordestgaard BG, Stender S, Kjeldsen K. Aortic permeability to LDL as a predictor of aortic cholesterol accumulation in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Arteriosclerosis. 1992;12:1402–1409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Born GVR, Shafi S. Evidence against the atherogenic passage of low density lipoproteins between vascular endothelial cells in conscious rabbits. J Physiol. 1989;418:80.

9. Rutledge JC, Curry FE, Blanche P, Krauss RM. Solvent drag of LDL across mammalian endothelial barriers with increased permeability. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H1982–H1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Schwenke DC, Carew TE. Initiation of atherosclerotic lesions in cholesterol-fed rabbits, II: selective retention of LDL vs selective increases in LDL permeability in susceptible sites of arteries. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9:908–918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Rutledge JC, Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase (LpL) affects low density lipoprotein (LDL) flux through vascular tissue: evidence that LpL increases LDL accumulation in vascular tissue. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:1152–1160.[Abstract]

12. Navab M, Berliner JA, Watson AD, Hama SY, Territo MC, Lusis AJ, Shih D, Van Lenten DJ, Frank JS, Demer LL. The Ying and Yang of oxidation in the development of the fatty streak: a review based on the 1994 George Lyman Duff Memorial Lecture. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:831–842.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Demuth K, Myara I, Chappey B, Vedie B, Pech-Amsellem MA, Haberland ME, Moatti N. Cytotoxic electronegative LDL subfraction is present in human plasma. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:773–783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Sevanian A, Hwang J, Hodis HN, Cazzolato G, Avogaro P, Bittolo-Bon G. Contribution of an in vivo oxidized LDL to LDL oxidation and its association with dense LDL subpopulations. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:784–793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Hodis HN, Kramsch DM, Avogaro P, Bittolo-Bon G, Cazzolato G, Hwang J, Peterson H, Sevanian A. Biochemical and cytotoxic characteristics of an in vivo circulating oxidized low density lipoprotein (LDL-). J Lipid Res. 1994;35:669–677.[Abstract]

16. Kotani K, Maekawa M, Kanno T, Kondo A, Toda N, Manabe M. Distribution of immunoreactive malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein in human serum. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1215:121–125.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Wang H, Chen S, Kong X, Wang X, Chang G, Xu S, Luo Z, Xie Y. Quantitation of plasma oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein by sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Clin Chim Acta. 1993;218:97–103.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Juul K, Nielsen LB, Munkholm K, Stender S, Nordestgaard BG. Oxidation of plasma low-density lipoprotein accelerates its accumulation and degradation in the arterial wall in vivo. Circulation. 1996;94:1698–1704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Wagner JD, Clarkson TB, St Clair RW, Schwenke DC, Shively CA, Adams MR. Estrogen and progesterone replacement therapy reduces low density lipoprotein accumulation in the coronary arteries of surgically postmenopausal cynomolgus monkeys. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1995–2002.

20. Wagner JD, Zhang L, Williams JK, Register TC, Ackerman DM, Witta B, Clarkson TB, Adams MR. Esterified estrogens with and without methyltestosterone decrease arterial LDL metabolism in cynomolgus monkeys. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:1473–1480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Maziere C, Auclair M, Ronveaux MF, Salmon S, Santus R, Maziere JC. Estrogens inhibit copper and cell-mediated modifications of low density lipoprotein. Atherosclerosis. 1991;89:175–182.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Negre-Salvayre A, Pieraggi MT, Mabile L, Salvayre R. Protective effect of 17 ß-estradiol against the cytotoxicity of minimally oxidized LDL to cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis. 1993;99:207–217.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Banka CL. Non-genomic actions of estrogens: estrogens as antioxidants. In: Rubanyi GM, Kauffman R, eds. Estrogen and the Vessel Wall. London, UK: Harwood Academic Publications; 1997.

24. Sack MN, Rader DJ, Cannon RO 3rd. Oestrogen and inhibition of oxidation of low-density lipoproteins in postmenopausal women. Lancet. 1994;343:269–270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Keaney JF Jr, Shwaery GT, Xu A, Nicolosi RJ, Loscalzo J, Foxall TL, Vita JA. 17ß-Estradiol preserves endothelial vasodilator function and limits low-density lipoprotein oxidation in hypercholesterolemic swine. Circulation. 1994;89:2251–2259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Olson ME, Bruce J. Ovariectomy, ovariohysterectomy and orchidectomy in rodents and rabbits. Can Vet J. 1986;27:523–527.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Brand K, Banka CL, Mackman N, Terkeltaub RA, Fan S, Curtiss LK. Oxidized LDL enhances lipopolysaccharide-induced tissue factor expression in human adherent monocytes. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:790–797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Berliner JA, Territo MC, Sevanian A, Ramin S, Kim JA, Bamshad B, Esterson M, Fogelman AM. Minimally modified low density lipoprotein stimulates monocyte endothelial interactions. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1260–1266.

29. Pitas RE, Innerarity TL, Weinstein JN, Mahley RW. Acetoacetylated lipoproteins used to distinguish fibroblasts from macrophages in vitro by fluorescence microscopy. Arteriosclerosis. 1981;1:177–185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Roberts KA, Rezai AA, Pinkerton KE, Rutledge JC. Effect of environmental tobacco smoke on LDL accumulation in the artery wall. Circulation. 1996;94:2248–2253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Rutledge JC, Pagakis SN. Extravascular distribution of low density lipoprotein and dextran in a high permeability state. Microvasc Res. 1990;40:137–156.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Roberts KA, Woo MM, Rutledge JC. Nitric oxide mediates LDL uptake in the artery wall in response to high concentrations of 17ß-estradiol. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2123–2131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Shille VM, Lundstrom KE, Stabenfeldt GH. Follicular function in the domestic cat as determined by estradiol-17ß concentrations in plasma: relation to estrous behavior and cornification of exfoliated vaginal epithelium. Biol Reprod. 1979;21:953–963.[Abstract]

34. Gilligan DM, Badar DM, Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO 3rd. Acute vascular effects of estrogen in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;90:786–791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Wagner JD, Cefalu WT, Anthony MS, Litwak KN, Zhang L, Clarkson TB. Dietary soy protein and estrogen replacement therapy improve cardiovascular risk factors and decrease aortic cholesteryl ester content in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys. Metabolism. 1997;46:698–705.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Barrett-Connor E. Sex differences in coronary heart disease: why are women so superior? the 1995 Ancel Keys Lecture. Circulation. 1997;95:252–264.[Free Full Text]

37. Berceli SA, Warty VS, Sheppeck RA, Mandarino WA, Tanksale SK, Borovetz HS. Hemodynamics and low density lipoprotein metabolism: rates of low density lipoprotein incorporation and degradation along medial and lateral walls of the rabbit aorto-iliac bifurcation. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:686–694.[Abstract]

38. Haarbo J, Nielsen LB, Stender S, Christiansen C. Aortic permeability to LDL during estrogen therapy: a study in normocholesterolemic rabbits. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:243–247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Hoffman RM, Garewal HS. Antioxidants and the prevention of coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:241–246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Walzem RL, Watkins S, Frankel EN, Hansen RJ, German JB. Older plasma lipoproteins are more susceptible to oxidation: a linking mechanism for the lipid and oxidation theories of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:7460–7464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Pang L, Sivaram P, Goldberg IJ. Cell-surface expression of an amino-terminal fragment of apolipoprotein B increases lipoprotein lipase binding to cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19518–19523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Huber LA, Scheffler E, Poll T, Ziegler R, Dresel HA. 17ß-Estradiol inhibits LDL oxidation and cholesteryl ester formation in cultured macrophages. Free Radic Res. 1990;8:167–173.

43. Walsh BA, Rutledge JC. Effects of female sex hormones on LDL accumulation in the artery wall. FASEB J. 1997;11:A151. Abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. Benton, A. Powers, L. Eiselein, R. Fitch, D. Wilson, A. C. Villablanca, and J. C. Rutledge
Hyperglycemia and loss of ovarian hormones mediate atheroma formation through endothelial layer disruption and increased permeability
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): R723 - R730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Mullick, U. B. Zaid, C. N. Athanassious, S. R. Lentz, J. C. Rutledge, and J. D. Symons
Hyperhomocysteinemia increases arterial permeability and stiffness in mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1349 - R1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
F. J. Byfield, S. Tikku, G. H. Rothblat, K. J. Gooch, and I. Levitan
OxLDL increases endothelial stiffness, force generation, and network formation
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 715 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. D. Symons, U. B. Zaid, C. N. Athanassious, A. E. Mullick, S. R. Lentz, and J. C. Rutledge
Influence of Folate on Arterial Permeability and Stiffness in the Absence or Presence of Hyperhomocysteinemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(4): 814 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
R. K. Dubey, B. Imthurn, M. Barton, and E. K. Jackson
Vascular consequences of menopause and hormone therapy: Importance of timing of treatment and type of estrogen
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2005; 66(2): 295 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Mullick, J. M. McDonald, G. Melkonian, P. Talbot, K. E. Pinkerton, and J. C. Rutledge
Reactive carbonyls from tobacco smoke increase arterial endothelial layer injury
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): H591 - H597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. D. Symons, A. E. Mullick, J. L. Ensunsa, A. A. Ma, and J. C. Rutledge
Hyperhomocysteinemia Evoked by Folate Depletion: Effects on Coronary and Carotid Arterial Function
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2002; 22(5): 772 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Mullick, B. A. Walsh, K. M. Reiser, and J. C. Rutledge
Chronic estradiol treatment attenuates stiffening, glycoxidation, and permeability in rat carotid arteries
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): H2204 - H2210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. Mortensen, V. Breinholt, T. Dalsgaard, H. Frandsen, S. T. Lauridsen, J. Laigaard, B. Ottesen, and J.-J. Larsen
17{beta}-Estradiol but not the phytoestrogen naringenin attenuates aortic cholesterol accumulation in WHHL rabbits
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2001; 42(5): 834 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
R. K. Dubey and E. K. Jackson
Estrogen-induced cardiorenal protection: potential cellular, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): F365 - F388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. A. Constantinescu, H. Vink, and J. A. E. Spaan
Elevated capillary tube hematocrit reflects degradation of endothelial cell glycocalyx by oxidized LDL
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): H1051 - H1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide