Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999;19:743-752

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sniderman, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sniderman, A. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biochemistry and metabolism
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999;19:743-752.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Role of Cholesterol Ester Mass in Regulation of Secretion of ApoB100 Lipoprotein Particles by Hamster Hepatocytes and Effects of Statins on That Relationship

Zujun Zhang; Katherine Cianflone; Allan D. Sniderman

*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Our understanding of the factors that regulate the secretion of apoB100 lipoproteins remains incomplete with considerable debate as to the role, if any, for cholesterol ester in this process. This study examines this issue in primary cultures of hamster hepatocytes, a species in which both cholesterol and apoB100 metabolism are very similar to man. Addition of oleate to medium increased the mass of triglyceride and cholesterol ester within the hepatocyte and also increased the secretion of triglycerides, cholesterol ester, and apoB100 into the medium. Next, the responses of hamster hepatocytes to addition of either an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (lovastatin) or an acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitor (58-035) to the medium, with or without added oleate, were determined. Effects of either agent were only evident in the oleate-supplemented medium in which cholesterol ester mass had been increased above basal. If oleate was not added to the medium, neither agent reduced apoB100 secretion; equally important, over the 24-hour incubation, neither agent, at the concentration used, produced any detectable change in intracellular cholesterol ester mass. However, in contrast to the estimates of mass, which were unchanged, under the same conditions radioisotopic estimates of cholesterol ester synthesis were markedly reduced. Any conclusion as to the relation of cholesterol ester mass to apoB100 secretion would therefore depend on which of the 2 methods was used. Overall, the data indicate a close correlation between the mass of cholesterol ester within the hepatocyte and apoB100 secretion from it and they go far to explain previous apparently contradictory data as to this relation. More importantly, though, taken with other available data, they indicate that the primary response of the liver to increased delivery of lipid is increased secretion rather than decreased uptake. These results point, therefore, to a hierarchy of hepatic responses to increased flux of fatty acids and increased synthesis of cholesterol that in turn suggests a more dynamic model of cholesterol homeostasis in the liver than has been appreciated in the past.


Key Words: hepatocytes • lipoprotein • cholesterol ester


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The rate at which the apoB100 lipoprotein particles are secreted by the liver is a major determinant of IDL and LDL particle number in plasma. Accordingly, it is a major determinant of atherogenic risk.1 Unfortunately, our understanding of the factors that regulate the rate of apoB100 secretion by the liver is recent and remains incomplete. In the case of apoB100 lipoprotein particles, variation in the rate at which they are secreted appears to be determined principally by variation in the proportion of newly synthesized apoB100 molecules, which are degraded compared with the proportion that are secreted, reflecting the complex coupling of multiple lipids to protein involved in the assembly and secretion of a lipoprotein particle.2

There are now considerable in vitro and in vivo data that point to a direct relation between the rate of cholesterol synthesis or mass of cholesterol ester within the hepatocyte and the secretion rate of hepatic apoB100 lipoproteins (for review see Reference 33 ). Nevertheless, not all studies agree. A number of in vitro studies, all done in HepG2 cells,4 5 6 7 8 have shown that reduced rates of cholesterol ester synthesis, induced by statins, as measured by radioisotopic techniques, did not result in a reduced rate of apoB100 secretion. This cell, unfortunately, has major limitations. The most important are that little of the neutral core lipid that is synthesized is secreted, and consequently few of the particles that are secreted resemble VLDL, most being considerably smaller with much less triglyceride in their core.9 10 11

Rat hepatocytes, the other most commonly used model, secrete apoB48 as well as apoB100,12 13 making extrapolations to humans difficult. By contrast, hamster hepatocytes, like human hepatocytes, secrete only apoB100.14 15 In addition, the total body cholesterol synthetic rates are comparable in humans and hamsters as is the level of acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT).16 Of note also, in primary cultures, no important differences between human and hamster hepatocytes with respect to cholesterol metabolism,17 lipoprotein synthesis and secretion,17 LDL binding and degradation,18 and bile acid synthesis19 have been observed. Importantly, most of the apoB100 particles secreted by hamster hepatocytes are triglyceride-rich,15 20 and when triglyceride synthesis is increased by increased delivery of glucose or fatty acids, most triglycerides are exported in apoB100 particles rather than being retained within the cell.20

The present studies were designed to examine further the relations between the masses of cholesterol and cholesterol ester and their rates of synthesis and the secretory rate of apoB100 lipoprotein particles by hamster hepatocytes. To do so, the rates of synthesis of cholesterol and cholesterol ester were manipulated by addition of either an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor or an ACAT inhibitor, whereas apoB secretion was increased by addition of oleate. The results indicate that under all circumstances there was a clear relation between the mass of cholesterol ester and the rate of secretion of apoB100 lipoprotein particles. This is apparent, however, only if mass is measured but is not evident if only radioisotopic estimates are used. Moreover, whether apoB100 secretion is reduced by a statin depends on the potency of the agent and the experimental conditions under which it is studied.

The data, therefore, appear to reconcile differences in interpretation reached in previous work. Even more importantly, they point to a hierarchy of mechanisms to modulate sterol balance in the hepatocyte, with increased secretion under these circumstances playing the primary role. Finally, the data explain why HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors work so effectively in humans with increased secretion of hepatic apoB100 lipoproteins caused by increased delivery of fatty acids to the liver.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials and Supplies
All reagents used were obtained from Fisher Scientific and Sigma unless otherwise indicated. Tissue culture medium, FCS, and other tissue culture supplies were obtained from Gibco. Hamster plasma was obtained from BioProducts for Science. [14C]Oleic acid (specific activity=50 mCi/mmol), [3H]acetate (specific activity=2 to 5 Ci/mmol), and [3H]mevalonate (specific activity=30 Ci/mmol) were obtained from DuPont-NEN. Oleate was complexed to BSA as described by Van Harken et al.21 The specific inhibitor of ACAT (58-035) was obtained from Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, and lovastatin and simvastatin, both HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, were obtained from Merck Frosst.

Isolation and Culture of Hamster Hepatocytes
Male Syrian golden hamsters weighing 100 to 120 g were used for hamster hepatocyte isolation. Under appropriate anesthesia, the abdomen was opened and the liver was perfused with 10 mmol/L HEPES in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free Hanks' buffer at 37°C at 4 mL/min for 20 minutes. The liver was then perfused with 0.025% collagenase A (Sigma Chemicals) dissolved in Hanks' buffer containing Ca2+ and Mg2+ at 37°C, 4 mL/min for 20 minutes. The liver was removed and placed in a sterile Petri dish with 20 mL of digestion solution for 15 minutes (0.1% collagenase A, 0.05% hyaluronidase [Boehringer Mannheim], and 0.01% DNase [Sigma] dissolved in DMEM/F12 media) at 37°C. After digestion, cells were filtered through sterile cotton gauze, washed 2 times (by centrifugation) with DMEM/F12 containing 20% FCS and penicillin G/streptomycin. Cells were finally resuspended in culture medium (20% FCS, 10 µg/mL insulin, penicillin G/streptomycin in DMEM medium). Cells were then plated out at a concentration of 2x106 cells/mL (1 mL/35-mm well) into tissue culture dishes that were coated with a solution of 3 µg/mL of collagen type IV (Becton Dickinson Labware) and incubated overnight to allow cells to attach.

Experimental Conditions
Before the experiments were performed, cells were preincubated for 4 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2 in serum-free medium supplemented with 1% BSA. Cells were then changed to fresh serum-free medium supplemented with 1% BSA and the indicated additions and incubated at 37°C overnight. At the end of the incubation period, the cells were placed on ice and the medium removed and set aside for analysis. The cells were washed 3 times with 1 mL ice-cold PBS. The intracellular lipids were extracted twice with 1 mL heptane-isopropanol (3:2 vol/vol) at room temperature for 30 minutes, and the extracts were pooled. Cell protein was solubilized in 1 mL of 0.1 N NaOH and quantified by the method of Bradford using a commercial assay (BioRad) with BSA as a standard.22

Determination of Intracellular and Secreted Lipids
Cell lipid extracts were concentrated and separated by thin-layer chromatography (Silica Gel G) using a solvent system consisting of hexane-ethyl ether-acetic acid (75:25:1 vol/vol/vol). Lipid spots were identified by exposure to iodine vapor and compared with reference lipids (Sigma). Triglyceride spots were scraped into tubes, and the lipid was extracted by adding 0.5 mL isopropanol; mass was determined by the method of Neri and Frings23 using a standard curve of 0 to 52 µg/mL triolein. Cholesterol ester spots were similarly scraped into tubes and cholesterol ester determined by the method of Rudel and Morris24 using a standard curve of 0 to 14 µg/mL cholesterol oleate. Cholesterol was determined in the same way using cholesterol as a standard. Conditioned medium was extracted with 3 volumes isopropanol-heptane (1:1 vol/vol) and the remainder extracted again with isopropanol-heptane (4:1 vol/vol) and 0.05% KOH. The lipid extract was then analyzed as above for medium cholesterol ester, triglyceride, and cholesterol mass. When radiolabeled tracers were used for triglyceride, cholesterol ester and cholesterol synthesis, after thin-layer chromatography the spots were scraped into tubes, lipid was solubilized with isopropanol-heptane (1:1 vol/vol), and an aliquot was taken for scintillation counting and the remainder used for mass analysis.

Measurement of 125I-LDL Cell Association and Degradation
Hamster hepatocytes were incubated overnight with 125I-labeled LDL under different experimental conditions. Cell-associated 125I-labeled LDL was determined by counting an aliquot of the soluble cell protein dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH. LDL degradation products in the medium were measured after precipitation of the remaining LDL with 6% trichloroacetic acid with 1 mg/mL BSA as carrier protein, followed by precipitation of free iodine with 1.7% AgNO3.

Determination of Intracellular and Secreted Bile Acids
Bile acids (cholate plus deoxycholate) were measured in concentrated medium and cell homogenates using a commercial colorimetric enzyme assay (Sigma). Total bile acids represents the sum of both medium and cells.

Determination of Hamster ApoB100 and ApoA1
An indirect competitive ELISA was used to quantify the apoB100 secreted by the hamster hepatocytes. To do so, hamster LDL was first isolated by ultracentrifugation (d=1.019 to 1.063 g/mL) and then separated by 3% to 15% polyacrylamide gradient SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions as described by Laemmli.25 The gel was stained with Coomassie blue, and the band corresponding to apoB100 was excised, emulsified with Freund's adjuvant, and injected subcutaneously 6 times at 3-week intervals to generate polyclonal antibody. Microtiter plates were coated overnight with 3 µg/mL LDL protein in PBS (pH=7.2) at 4°C and then blocked with 1.5% BSA in PBS for 2 hours at room temperature. Standards (range, 0.031 to 4 µg/mL) of LDL-derived apoB100 were prepared. Rabbit anti-hamster apoB100 polyclonal antibody (150 µL of antibody diluted appropriately in PBS containing 0.5 mL/L Tween 20) was added to each sample (standards and hamster media) and incubated overnight. Then 100 µL of each sample was added in triplicate to the microtiter plate for 2 hours at 37°C. After this incubation, plates were washed, and 100 µL anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (diluted in 4% polyethylene glycol, 0.5 mL/L Tween 20 in PBS) was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Plates were again washed, and a colorimetric reaction was initiated by adding 100 µL of 1 mg/mL o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride in 0.018% H2O2 in 100 mmol/L sodium citrate, pH 5.0, with 0.5 mL/L Tween 20. The color reaction was stopped with 50 µL of 4 N H2SO4, and the plate was read spectrophotometrically at 490 nm. A log-log plot of apoB100 concentration (µg/mL) versus absorbance at 490 nm was constructed, and linear least squares analysis of the data was performed.

To obtain hamster apoA1, HDL was isolated from hamster plasma by density gradient ultracentrifugation. This was then electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel according to the method of Laemmli,25 and the band corresponding to apoA1 cut out, emulsified, and injected subcutaneously in a rabbit to generate a rabbit anti-hamster apoA1 antibody. Antigen (3 µg/mL) was coated overnight at 4°C, and the plate was blocked for 2 hours with 250 µL of 1.5% BSA. Plates were washed in 0.9% saline 5 to 6 times between each step. Standards (0.03 to 1.25 µg/mL), blanks, controls, and samples were diluted appropriately in 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween in PBS, and 150 µL was added to 150 µL of diluted primary antibody and incubated overnight at 4°C. The remaining steps of the apoA1 assay are identical to those of the apoB100 assay.

Lipoprotein Fractionation From Hamster Medium
Medium from hamster hepatocytes was fractionated by sequential density ultracentrifugation as described previously.20 Hamster cell medium was layered under a salt solution of density d 1.006 g/mL and centrifuged at 100 000g for 18 hours, and the top 2 mL was collected as VLDL. The remaining solution was adjusted to d 1.019 g/mL and recentrifuged for 20 hours at 100 000g. The top 2 mL was collected as IDL. The remaining solution was adjusted to d 1.063 g/mL and recentrifuged (100 000g, 20 hours), and the top 2 mL was collected as LDL. Finally, the remaining solution was adjusted to d 1.21 g/mL and recentrifuged (100 000g, 20 hours), and the top 2 mL was collected as HDL. ApoB100, cholesterol ester mass, and triglyceride mass were measured on each fraction (VLDL, IDL, LDL, HDL, and the remaining infranatant fluid) as described above.

Statistics
Results are expressed as mean±SEM. Significance was determined by two-tailed t test where significance was set at P<0.05 and NS= not significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The effect of oleate on the secretion of apoB100, cholesterol ester and triglyceride by hamster hepatocytes is shown in Figure 1Down. In these studies, the cells were incubated with or without 0.8 mmol/L oleate complexed to albumin, and the masses of apoB100, cholesterol ester, and triglyceride in the medium were determined at 3, 6, and 24 hours. Oleate caused a substantial increase in all 3 components at all 3 times. There was, however, no change in the cholesterol ester to apoB100 ratio (1.1±0.3 control [CTL] versus 0.8±0.1 oleate; P=NS) or the triglyceride to apoB100 ratio (18±5 CTL versus 11.3±2.6 oleate; P=NS) during the course of the experiment. Thus, increased delivery of oleate to hamster hepatocytes caused increased accumulation of apoB100 lipoproteins without evident change in their composition. This increase, however, was not linear, being most pronounced in the first 6 hours of the incubation, a finding that may reflect depletion of fatty acid in the medium.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of oleate on apoB100 and lipid secretion over 24 hours. Primary hamster hepatocytes were cultured for the indicated times in CTL or 0.8 mmol/L oleate-supplemented (FFA) medium. At the indicated times, the media were collected, apoB100 measured by ELISA assay (left), and aliquots of the media extracted for cholesterol ester mass (CE, middle) and triglyceride mass (TG, right). Results are expressed as mean±SEM in micrograms per milligram cell protein for n=6 dishes for each point in 4 separate experiments.

Next, the effect of oleate on the density distribution of the apoB100 lipoproteins in the medium was determined. As illustrated in Figure 2Down (top), even in the absence of oleate, most of the apoB100 in the medium (56±10%) is recovered in the VLDL-IDL density range. Oleate causes this to increase still further. Thus with addition of oleate, the amount of VLDL apoB100 increased by 79% (P<0.025). At the same time, there was an increase in apoB100 mass in the IDL density range (d=1.006 to 1019 g/mL, 116% increase; P<0.0125) without any change occurring in the amount of apoB100 in the LDL density range (d=1.019 to 1.063 g/mL). Less than 2% of the apoB100 was detected in the higher density range (d=1.063 to 1.21 g/mL). Overall, therefore, there was both absolutely and proportionately more VLDL apoB100 secreted as a consequence of addition of oleate to the medium. With respect to cholesterol ester, the mass in VLDL increased as did that in IDL and HDL density range with little change in LDL cholesterol ester mass (Figure 2Down, middle). Triglyceride, however, increased significantly only in VLDL and LDL (Figure 2Down, bottom).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of oleate on lipoprotein distribution of apoB100 and media lipids. Primary hamster hepatocytes were cultured overnight in CTL conditions or supplemented with 0.8 mmol/L oleate (FFA). The media were collected, concentrated, and separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation into VLDL (d<1.006 g/mL), IDL (d=1.006 to 1.019 g/mL), LDL (d=1.019 to 1.063 g/mL), and HDL (d=1.063 to 1.21 g/mL) lipoprotein fractions. ApoB100 (top) was measured on each fraction by ELISA assay, aliquots of the media were extracted and CE (middle) and TG (bottom) were measured. Results are expressed as mean±SEM in micrograms per milligram cell protein for n=9 dishes from 5 separate experiments where * indicates P<0.05; **, P<0.025; and ***, P<0.005.

The impact of varying the concentration of oleate in the medium on the secretion of apoB100 and apoA1 was then examined. The data in Figure 3Down (left) illustrate that a stepwise increase in the concentration of oleate in the medium had no effect on the accumulation of apoA1 in the medium whereas the concentration of apoB100 increased progressively, from an initial level of 6.0±1.15 µg/mg cell protein to a final value of 15.2±2.8 µg/mg cell protein, a 252±37% increase overall. As shown in Figure 3Down (top right), the total mass of cholesterol ester—that is, the mass in the cells and the medium—increased progressively as the oleate concentration in the medium was increased, as did also the total mass of triglyceride in the cells and medium (Figure 3Down, bottom right). Addition of oleate to the medium therefore resulted in substantial increase in secretion of apoB100 as well as marked increases in the synthesis and secretion of both cholesterol ester and triglyceride.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of increasing concentrations of oleate on apoprotein and lipid secretion. Primary hamster hepatocytes were cultured overnight in the presence of increasing concentrations of oleate (0 to 1 mmol/L). The medium was harvested and the cells extracted and collected. ApoB100 (B) and apoA1 (A-I) were measured in the medium by ELISA assay (left). Media and cells were extracted and the mass of CE (top right) and TG (bottom right) were quantified. Results are expressed as mean±SEM in micrograms per milligram cell protein for n=8 dishes for each point in 3 separate experiments where * indicates P<0.05; **, P<0.005; and ***, P<0.001.

Having characterized the responses of the hamster hepatocytes to increased delivery of oleate, the next objective was to examine the effects of agents that alter the synthesis of cholesterol and cholesterol ester on these processes. To do so, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, lovastatin, was added to the medium, with or without additional oleate (0.8 mmol/L). Similarly, the effects of an ACAT inhibitor, 58-035, were studied under basal and oleate stimulated conditions. The masses of cholesterol and cholesterol ester were determined in both the cells and the medium, and the concentration of apoB100 was determined in the medium.

The results are shown in Table 1Down. In the absence of oleate in the medium, the mass of apoB100 did not change significantly with addition of either inhibitor to the medium, a finding that might lead to the conclusion that the secretion of apoB100 was unrelated to either cholesterol or cholesterol ester. The determination of cholesterol and cholesterol ester masses in the cells and the medium make it evident, however, that their masses were also unchanged. Thus, under basal conditions, neither the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, lovastatin, nor the ACAT inhibitor, 58-035, at the concentrations used altered hepatocyte cholesterol or cholesterol ester homeostasis in terms of mass. Accordingly, these experimental conditions do not allow the hypothesis that apoB100 secretion might relate to one or other of these variables to be either confirmed or refuted.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of Fatty Acid, Lovastatin, and 58-035 on Hepatocyte Sterol Mass and ApoB100 Secretion

Very different results were obtained when apoB100 secretion was studied after addition of oleate to the medium. As demonstrated previously, oleate caused apoB100 concentration in the medium and cholesterol ester mass in the hepatocytes and in the medium to increase substantially (Table 1Up). As well, the proportion of cholesterol ester to free cholesterol in the medium also increased. Addition of the ACAT inhibitor did not affect the mass of free cholesterol in the cells or the medium (Table 1Up). However, the mass of cholesterol ester was significantly reduced within the cells to the level present under basal conditions. The mass of apoB100 and the mass of cholesterol ester in the medium were also both significantly reduced below the levels produced by oleate stimulation. Thus, in effect, the ACAT inhibitor restored basal conditions with respect to cellular cholesterol ester mass and apoB100 secretion.

Although acting at a different site in the cholesterol-cholesterol ester synthetic cycle, much the same results were obtained with addition of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor to the medium. Again, the mass of cholesterol ester within the cell was restored to basal conditions, but the mass of free cholesterol remained unchanged from basal. ApoB100 in the medium was reduced to basal levels as were the amounts of both free cholesterol and cholesterol ester in the medium (Table 1Up). Neither inhibitor significantly affected total triglyceride mass (data not shown).

If there was no difference produced by the experimental interventions in cholesterol breakdown (see below), differences in the total mass of cholesterol and cholesterol ester in the cells and medium under the different conditions must represent differences in the amount of cholesterol synthesized by the cell during this period. Under basal conditions, this did not change with addition of either the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor or the ACAT inhibitor to the medium. With oleate stimulation, however, the mass of total cholesterol, and therefore cholesterol synthesis, increased markedly. Both lovastatin and 58-035 reduced cholesterol synthesis to that present under basal conditions.

Although the cholesterol ester to apoB100 ratio in the medium was the same under both control and oleate-stimulated conditions (data not shown), the triglyceride to apoB100 ratio increased significantly when apoB100 secretion was reduced by either the ACAT inhibitor or the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (69±19 [oleate alone] versus 101±22 [58-035+oleate], P<0.05; versus 135±25 [lovastatin+oleate], P<0.05). Thus both agents resulted in the secretion of fewer particles, but those that were secreted were enriched in triglyceride.

Next, the observation period during which the cells were incubated with and without lovastatin (5 µmol/L) was extended to 48 hours. In the oleate-stimulated cells, apoB100 secretion (Table 2Down) and cholesterol ester mass (not shown) were less at all times with addition of lovastatin to the medium. By contrast, in the control cells, there was evidence of an inhibitor effect only at 36 and 48 hours, indicating that decreases in cholesterol ester and apoB100 are only seen after sustained enzyme inhibition is achieved.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of Lovastatin on ApoB100 Secretion During Long-Term Incubation of Hamster Hepatocytes

The effects of another HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, simvastatin, were also examined. As shown in Figure 4Down, after 24 hours of incubation simvastatin reduced apoB100 concentration in the medium under both basal and oleate-supplemented conditions. This effect was achieved at low doses of the inhibitor (0.5 µmol/L). Simvastatin is, therefore, a more potent agent than lovastatin. Of note, simvastatin inhibited both the basal level of apoB100 secretion (14% to 21% inhibition, P<0.02 by ANOVA) and that in oleate-treated hepatocytes (21% to 67% inhibition, P<0.001 by ANOVA).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of increasing concentration of simvastatin and apoB100 secretion. Primary hamster hepatocytes were cultured overnight in CTL conditions or supplemented with 0.8 mmol/L oleate (FFA) and indicated concentrations of simvastatin. Medium was collected for apoB100 determination. Results are the average of n=3 where P<0.02 for control-treated and P<0.001 for FFA-treated cells (ANOVA).

The time course of simvastatin on apoB100 secretion was then examined. As shown in Figure 5Down, at all times from 3 to 48 hours, simvastatin inhibited the oleate-induced stimulation of apoB100 by -18% to -46%, P<0.05. Cholesterol ester mass was reduced by simvastatin at all times with oleate stimulation as well (data not shown). Moreover, in contrast to lovastatin, under basal conditions at all times after 3 hours, basal secretion of apoB100 was reduced by -9% to -44% by simvastatin. Cholesterol ester mass was reduced by simvastatin at all times under basal conditions as well (data not shown). Therefore, under basal conditions, as with lovastatin, it takes longer for the effect of simvastatin on apoB100 secretion to be evident compared with the oleate-stimulated cells. Nevertheless, simvastatin was clearly more potent than lovastatin.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of simvastatin on apoB100 production in hamster hepatocytes. Hepatocytes were incubated under basal conditions or with 0.8 mmol/L oleate supplemented with simvastatin (Simva; 5 µmol/L). Medium and cells were collected at the indicated times, and apoB100 was measured in medium. Results are expressed as mean±SEM micrograms apoB100 per milligram cell protein for n=5 to 8 dishes in 3 experiments where * indicates P<0.05; **, P<0.005 vs basal; and #, P<0.05 vs oleate supplementation.

In many studies, the effects of various interventions on synthesis and mass of lipids are inferred from radioisotopic results. In the experiments just reported, the effects of both the ACAT inhibitor and the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor on the rates of lipid synthesis as deduced by radioisotopic techniques were also determined. These data are presented in Tables 3Down and 4Down. With respect to the ACAT inhibitor, under basal conditions, there was an apparent decrease of approximately 40% in cholesterol ester synthesis using either mevalonate or oleate tracer. This does not correspond to the mass measurements, which show no change (Table 1Up). With addition of oleate to the medium, the apparent decrease in estimated cholesterol ester synthesis with the inhibitors doubled, and significant reductions in free cholesterol and triglyceride synthesis also appeared to be present. Again this does not correspond to the mass data, which demonstrated that cholesterol and cholesterol ester mass were reduced to basal levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effect of ACAT Inhibitor 58-035 on Intracellular Cholesterol Ester, Cholesterol, and Triglyceride Synthesis as Estimated by Radioisotopic Tracers


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Effect of an HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor, Lovastatin, on Intracellular Cholesterol Ester, Cholesterol, and Triglyceride Synthesis as Estimated by Radioisotopic Tracers

Precisely the same results were obtained when radioisotopic synthetic rates were measured in the presence of lovastatin (Table 4Up). Under basal conditions, from the radioisotopic data, the masses of both cholesterol and cholesterol ester in the cells and the medium should have decreased substantially, but according to the mass measurements, neither did. Depending, therefore, on which technique is used, apoB100 secretion would either correlate well, or not at all, with cholesterol and cholesterol ester metabolism.

The mass of cholesterol and cholesterol ester within the hepatocyte is a function of (1) the rate at which both are secreted within apoB100 lipoproteins; (2) the rate at which both are taken up within apoB100 lipoproteins; (3) the rate at which cholesterol is synthesized; and (4) the rate at which cholesterol is broken down to bile acids. To determine the effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on these processes, LDL cell association and degradation was measured for 24 hours. These results are shown in Table 5Down. Under basal conditions, lovastatin (25 µmol/L) had no significant effect on total LDL cell association and degradation by hamster hepatocytes. When oleate was added to the medium, there was a small but significant increase (30%, P<0.05) in LDL uptake and degradation. Addition of lovastatin to the oleate-enriched medium did not change LDL cell association but did significantly reduce LDL cell degradation (P<0.05). This finding is particularly important because it establishes that the lovastatin-induced decrease in apoB100 concentration in the oleate-supplemented medium must be because of decreased secretion rather than increased removal. It is also directionally opposite to that which would be predicted on the basis of the usual model of action of lovastatin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Effect of Lovastatin on 125I-LDL Cell Association and Degradation

No inference as to net cholesterol balance is possible without examining whether its degradation was altered by the experimental manipulations. Accordingly, bile acid synthesis was estimated to determine whether there had been a compensatory decrease with the addition of lovastatin. As shown in Figure 6Down, basal bile acid synthesis measured as total (cell plus medium) cholate plus deoxycholate levels was the same at all times. Oleate supplementation stimulated bile acid production by 20% to 120% (P<0.01) with lovastatin producing a slight inhibitory effect (-14% to -36%, P<0.025).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of lovastatin on bile acid production in hamster hepatocytes. Hepatocytes were incubated under basal conditions or with 0.8 mmol/L oleate supplemented with lovastatin (L; 5 µmol/L). Medium and cells were collected at the indicated times, and bile acids were measured in both cells and medium. Results are expressed as mean±SEM nanomoles total (medium plus cells) bile acids (cholate plus deoxycholate) per milligram cell protein for n=6 to 9 dishes in 3 experiments where * indicates P<0.025 vs basal; #, P<0.025 vs oleate supplementation.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Statins markedly reduce plasma LDL, and upregulation of hepatic LDL receptors has been widely thought to be principally responsible for this effect. More recent studies, however, point to statins also reducing VLDL secretion with a consequent decrease in LDL production.3 Both atorvastatin26 and simvastatin27 will lower LDL in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors will, therefore, reduce LDL levels in the absence of LDL receptors. The same result has been obtained in mice in which LDL receptor activity had been genetically deleted28 and in Watanabe Hereditable Hyperlipidemic rabbits.29 There is, therefore, a wide array of in vitro and in vivo observations that establish that statins markedly reduce hepatic apoB100 secretion and that this effect may be a principal therapeutic mechanism of this class of agents.

The present data add to that evidence. Importantly, they also help explain why a number of in vitro studies4 5 6 7 8 have not demonstrated this effect. We have shown that the statin effect in vitro depends on the potency and concentration of the statin. Simvastatin reduced apoB100 secretion at all concentrations and under both basal and oleate-stimulated conditions. By contrast, lovastatin reduced apoB100 secretion under basal condition only with more prolonged incubation times or if oleate had been added to the medium.

The data demonstrate that as cholesterol ester mass increased because of increased delivery of fatty acids to the liver, apoB100 secretion increased, and that when cholesterol ester mass was returned to normal by either a statin or an ACAT inhibitor, apoB100 secretion returned to basal levels. On the other hand, under basal conditions, apoB100 secretion was not reduced unless cholesterol ester mass was also. The data demonstrate, therefore, a clear and consistent relationship between cholesterol ester mass and apoB100 secretion.

Different interpretations were reached in previous studies,4 5 6 7 8 in many of which changes in cholesterol ester mass were inferred from radioisotopic methods4 5 6 7 and marked effects on apoB100 secretion were noted with very short incubation times with oleate.4 5 6 7 8 In this study, we have demonstrated that inferences from radioisotopic studies were not quantitatively valid with respect to changes in mass. These discrepancies likely arise for 2 principal reasons. The first is caused by unrecognized dilution of isotope in precursor pools, which are not estimated in these types of experiments. Second, as demonstrated in this study, it requires time to deplete the mass of cholesterol ester in the hepatocyte, and until this occurs, no change in apoB100 secretion would be anticipated. It is critical to note that, with one exception,8 all the negative studies relating to the relationship of sterol balance and apoB100 secretion showed that addition of either an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor or an ACAT inhibitor to the medium reduced the rate of synthesis of cholesterol or cholesterol ester as estimated by radioisotopic studies in the hepatocyte, but, over the short time of the experiment, did not change the mass of cholesterol ester within it,4 5 6 7 as was indeed specifically noted in two of these studies5 6 The data, therefore, of the previous negative studies and the present positive study are in accord.

The mass of cholesterol ester available to couple with apoB100 appears important in determining the proportion of newly synthesized apoB100 molecules that are degraded as opposed to the proportion that are secreted. Increasing the delivery of cholesterol to the liver via LDL has been shown by Tanaka et al30 to increase the secretion efficiency of apoB100. By contrast, addition of atorvastatin has recently been shown to reduce secretion efficiency by impacting on the translocation of newly synthesized apoB100 molecules.31

It is possible that the immediate effects of oleate on apoB100 secretion that have been reported5 6 8 may be produced by an entirely different mechanism than the longer term effects, which we suggest are caused by cholesterol ester. In the first instance, the onset and arrest of the early oleate effect is so rapid, within 30 minutes for both, for example, that no change in cholesterol ester mass is possible in this time frame. Second, the longer term effects of oleate on apoB100 secretion are much more modest than the shorter term ones but in line with differences from normal in humans with increased secretion of hepatic apoB100 lipoproteins.3 By contrast, short-term increases, which range from 3- to 18-fold, in apoB100 secretion have been noted in in vitro studies,6 8 a value much beyond any we have noted in 24- to 48-hour incubations. By the same token, the degree of reduction of apoB100 secretion with administration of statins documented in this and other in vitro studies corresponds closely to the degree of reduction of LDL observed clinically.3

Notwithstanding their potent effect on apoB100 secretion, clinically statins produce a more modest reduction in plasma triglyceride than they do on plasma apoB100 or total or LDL cholesterol. The observation in this study that addition of the statin to the medium resulted in the secretion of fewer apoB100 particles, which were, however, enriched in triglyceride, may explain this apparent paradox and is yet another example that hepatic triglyceride secretion and apoB100 secretion are not synonymous. Certainly, the tight linkage between increased delivery of fatty acids to the liver and increased synthesis of cholesterol and cholesterol ester within it provides a clear physiological rationale for the use of statins in the many patients with overproduction of hepatic apoB100 lipoproteins caused by increased delivery of fatty acids to the liver. In this regard, the demonstration of a highly significant correlation between cholesterol synthesis, as reflected by plasma mevalonic acid, and VLDL apoB100 secretion in both normals32 33 and patients with secondary hypertriglyceridemia34 35 is, we believe, strongly supportive of the present results.

Finally, the present data are difficult to reconcile with the model that the LDL pathway is the only important determinant of the concentration of LDL in plasma, and indeed they are difficult to reconcile with the generally accepted model of regulation of sterol balance within the hepatocyte. In this instance, sterol balance was perturbed by increasing fatty acid delivery to the liver. A positive effect of fatty acids on cholesterol biosynthesis was previously observed by Goh and Heimberg36 and related to an increase in HMG-CoA reductase activity.37 In this study, the effect was dramatic, with addition of oleate to the medium causing the total cholesterol mass to double by increasing cholesterol synthesis. However, in the face of this marked increase in cholesterol synthesis, the activity of the LDL pathway was not downregulated as would be predicted by the LDL receptor paradigm.38

The explanation for this divergence would appear to be as follows: Increased delivery of fatty acids to the liver results in increased formation of cholesterol ester via the ACAT reaction, which leads in turn to increased secretion of cholesterol and cholesterol ester from the cell. To maintain the free cholesterol content of the cell, cholesterol synthesis must, therefore, increase. But the increased cholesterol synthesis, in effect, only reconstitutes the free cholesterol content of the hepatocyte. Thus, in the hepatocyte, in contrast to the fibroblast, an increase in cholesterol ester mass within the cell and an increase in cholesterol ester and free cholesterol mass secreted from the cell serve as safety valves to maintain hepatocyte membrane free cholesterol content within the narrow limits necessary for normal cell function without the automatic necessity for downregulation of the activity of the LDL pathway.

In our study, cholesterol flux through the hepatocyte was increased by increasing synthesis, but other investigators have increased cholesterol flux by increasing cholesterol delivery. Tanaka et al30 as well as Havekes and colleagues39 have shown that increased uptake of LDL by either rabbit hepatocytes or HepG2 cells, respectively, also does not alter LDL receptor activity. Cholesterol ester mass increases as does apoB100 secretion without free cholesterol being affected. Thus, once again, the total flux of cholesterol through the hepatocyte increased without any expansion of the mass of free cholesterol within it.

On the other hand, Havekes et al39 showed that addition of both LDL and an ACAT inhibitor to the incubation medium resulted in an increase in free cholesterol and a substantial decrease in LDL receptor activity in HepG2 cells. Taken together, we suggest the data are consistent with the hypothesis that apoB100 secretion is related to the cholesterol ester mass in the hepatocyte whereas LDL receptor activity is related to the free cholesterol content in the regulatory pool. Because cholesterol ester mass and apoB100 secretion are so tightly linked in the hepatocyte, increased cholesterol synthesis or increased cholesterol delivery will not automatically result in downregulation of the LDL pathway so long as the mass of free cholesterol within the hepatocyte remains constant. These experimental findings point, therefore, to a hierarchy of adaptions to altered sterol balance by the liver with, in general, alterations in secretion occurring before changes in clearance. If valid, they suggest that the LDL receptor paradigm,38 which was developed in the fibroblast and represents a sample model of static cellular sterol equilibrium, needs to be reinterpreted in the context of the hepatocyte, a complex model of dynamic sterol equilibrium.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a grant from Merck Frosst Canada. K. Cianflone is a research scholar of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

Received July 9, 1998; accepted October 14, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Sniderman AD, Brown BG, Stewart FF, Cianflone K. From familial combined hyperlipidemia to hyperapoB: unraveling overproduction of hepatic apoB lipoproteins. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1992;3:137–142.

2. Yao Z, Tran K, Mcleod RS. Intracellular degradation of newly synthesized apolipoprotein B. J Lipid Res. 1997;38:1937–1953.[Abstract]

3. Thompson GR, Naoumova RP, Watts GF. Role of cholesterol in regulating apolipoprotein B secretion by the liver. J Lipid Res. 1996;37:439–447.[Abstract]

4. Sato R, Imanaka T, Takano T. The effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (CS-514) on the synthesis and secretion of apolipoproteins B and A-1 in the human hepatoblastoma Hep G2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1042:36–41.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Furukawa S, Hirano T. Rapid stimulation of apolipoprotein B secretion by oleate is not associated with cholesteryl ester biosynthesis in HepG2 cells. Biochim BiophysActa. 1993;1170:32–37.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Wu X, Sakata N, Lui E, Ginsberg HN. Evidence for a lack of regulation of the assembly and secretion of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoprotein from HepG2 cells by cholesteryl ester. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:12375–12382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Graham A, Wood JL, Russell LJ. Cholesterol esterification is not essential for secretion of lipoprotein components by HepG2 cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1302:46–54.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Benoist F, Grand-Perret T. ApoB-100 secretion by HepG2 cells is regulated by the rate of triglyceride biosynthesis but not by intracellular lipid pools. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:1229–1235[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Cianflone K, Yasruel Z, Rodriguez MA, Vas D, Sniderman AD. Regulation and apoB secretion from HepG2 cells: evidence for a critical role for cholesteryl ester synthesis in the response to a fatty acid challenge. J Lipid Res. 1990;31:2045–2055.[Abstract]

10. Cianflone K, Dahan S, Monge JC, Sniderman AD. Pathogenesis of carbohydrate induced hypertriglyceridemia using HepG2 cells as a model system. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:271–277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Gibbons GF, Khurana R, Odwell A, Seelaender MCL. Lipid balance in HepG2 cells: active synthesis and impaired mobilization. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:1801–1808[Abstract]

12. Swift LL. Assembly of very low density lipoproteins in rat liver: a study of nascent particles recovered from the rough endoplasmic reticulum. J Lipid Res. 1995;36:395–406.[Abstract]

13. Rusinol A, Verkade H, Vance JE. Assembly of rat hepatic very low density lipoproteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:3555–3562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Liu GL, Fan LM, Redinger RN. The association of hepatic apoprotein and lipid metabolism in hamsters and rats. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1991;99a:223–228.

15. Arbeeny CM, Myers DS, Bergquist RE, Gregg RE. Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis decreases very low density lipoprotein secretion in the hamster. J Lipid Res. 1992;33:843–851.[Abstract]

16. Spady DK, Dietschy J. Dietary saturated triacylglycerols suppress hepatic low density lipoprotein receptor activity in the hamster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:4526–4530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Hoang VQ, Pearce NJ, Suckling KE, Botham KM. Evaluation of cultured hamster hepatocytes as an experimental model of the study of very low density lipoprotein secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1254:37–44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Salter AM, Sessions VA. LDL binding to hepatocytes isolated from hamsters fed different dietary fatty acids. Biochem Soc Trans. 1993;21:150S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Hoang VQ, Botham K, Pearce NJ, Suckling KE. The regulation of bile acid synthesis in cultured hamster hepatocytes. Biochem Soc Trans. 1993;21:284S.

20. Sniderman AD, Zhang Z, Cianflone K. Divergent responses of the liver to increased delivery of glucose or fatty acids: implications for the pathogenesis of type IV hyperlipoproteinemia. Atherosclerosis. 1998;137:291–301.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Van Harken DR, Dixon CW, Heimberg M. Hepatic lipid metabolism in experimental diabetes V: the effect of concentration of oleate on metabolism of triglycerides and on ketogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1969;244:2278–2285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities or protein utilizing the principal of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Neri BP, Frings CS. Improved method for determination of triglycerides in serum. Clin Chem. 1973;19:1201–1202.[Abstract]

24. Rudel LL, Morris MD. Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde. J Lipid Res. 1973;14:364–366.[Abstract]

25. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Marais AD, Naoumova RP, Firth JC, Penny C, Neuwirth CK, Thompson GR. Decreased production of low density lipoprotein by atorvastatin after apheresis in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J Lipid Res. 1997;38:2071–2078.[Abstract]

27. Raal F, Pilcher GJ, Illingworth DR, Pappu AS, Stein EA, Laskarzewski P, Mitchel YB, Melino MR. Expanded-dose simvastatin is effective in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis. 1997;135:249–256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Bisgaier CL, Essenburg AD, Auerbach BJ, Pape ME, Sekerke CS, Gee A, Wolle S, Newton RS. Attenuation of plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol by select 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in mice devoid of low density lipoprotein receptors. J Lipid Res. 1997;38:2502–2515.[Abstract]

29. Shiomi M, Shiraishi M, Yata T, Ito T. Effect of fluvastatin sodium on secretion of very low density lipoprotein and serum cholesterol levels. Drug Res. 1994;44:1154–1156.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Tanaka M, Jingami H, Otani H, Cho M, Ueda Y, Arai H, Nagano Y, Doi T, Yokode M, Kita T. Regulation of apolipoprotein B production and secretion in response to the change of intracellular cholesteryl ester content in rabbit hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:12713–12718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Mohammadi A, Macri J, Newton R, Romain T, Dulay D, Adeli K. Effects of atorvastatin on the intracellular stability and secretion of apolipoprotein B in HepG2 cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:783–793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Watts GF, Naoumova R, Cummings MH, Umpleby, AM, Slavin BM, S246snksen PH, Thompson GR. Direct correlation between cholesterol synthesis and hepatic secretion of apolipoprotein B-100 in normolipidemic subjects. Metabolism. 1995;44:1052–1057.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Watts GF, Naoumova RP, Kelly JM, Riches FM, Croft KD, Thompson GR. Inhibition of cholesterogenesis decreases hepatic secretion of apoB-100 in normolipidemic subjects. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:E462–E470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Cummings MH, Watts GF, Pal C, Umpleby M, Hennessy TR, Naoumova R, S246snksen PH. Increased hepatic secretion of very-low-density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B-100 in obesity: a stable isotope study. Clin Sci. 1995;88:225–233.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Cummings MH, Watts GF, Umpleby AM, Hennessy TR, Naoumova R, Slavin BM, Thompson GR, S246snksen PH. Increased hepatic secretion of very-low-density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B-100 in NIDDM. Diabetologia. 1995;38:959–967.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Goh EH, Heimberg M. Stimulation of hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis by oleic acid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973;55:382–388.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Goh EH, Heimberg M. Effects of free fatty acids on activity of hepatic microsomal 3-hydroxy-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase and on secretion of cholesterol and triglyceride by the liver. J Biol Chem. 1977;252:2822–2826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1986;232:34–37.[Free Full Text]

39. Havekes LM, DeWit ECM, Prince HNG. Cellular free cholesterol in HepG2 cells is only partially available for down-regulation of low-density-lipoprotein receptor activity. Biochem J. 1987;247:739–746.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
R. E. Temel, L. Hou, L. L. Rudel, and G. S. Shelness
ACAT2 stimulates cholesteryl ester secretion in apoB-containing lipoproteins
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1618 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
F. Basso, L. A. Freeman, C. Ko, C. Joyce, M. J. Amar, R. D. Shamburek, T. Tansey, F. Thomas, J. Wu, B. Paigen, et al.
Hepatic ABCG5/G8 overexpression reduces apoB-lipoproteins and atherosclerosis when cholesterol absorption is inhibited
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 114 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Marcil, H. Vu, W. Cui, Z. Dastani, J. C. Engert, D. Gaudet, M. Castro-Cabezas, A. D. Sniderman, J. Genest Jr, and K. Cianflone
Identification of a Novel C5L2 Variant (S323I) in a French Canadian Family With Familial Combined Hyperlipemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(7): 1619 - 1625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. J. Liang, P. Oelkers, C. Guo, P.-C. Chu, J. L. Dixon, H. N. Ginsberg, and S. L. Sturley
Overexpression of Human Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 1, Acyl-CoA:Cholesterol Acyltransferase 1, or Acyl-CoA:Cholesterol Acyltransferase 2 Stimulates Secretion of Apolipoprotein B-containing Lipoproteins in McA-RH7777 Cells
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44938 - 44944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. Ouguerram, M. Chetiveaux, Y. Zair, P. Costet, M. Abifadel, M. Varret, C. Boileau, T. Magot, and M. Krempf
Apolipoprotein B100 Metabolism in Autosomal-Dominant Hypercholesterolemia Related to Mutations in PCSK9
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2004; 24(8): 1448 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. H. C. M. T. Prinsen, J. A. Romijn, P. H. Bisschop, M. M. J. de Barse, P. H. R. Barrett, M. Ackermans, R. Berger, T. J. Rabelink, and M. G. M. de Sain-van der Velden
Endogenous cholesterol synthesis is associated with VLDL-2 apoB-100 production in healthy humans
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1341 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
V. Marcil, E. Delvin, C. Garofalo, and E. Levy
Butyrate Impairs Lipid Transport by Inhibiting Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein in Caco-2 Cells
J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2180 - 2183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. D. Sniderman, Z. Zhang, J. Genest, and K. Cianflone
Effects on apoB-100 secretion and bile acid synthesis by redirecting cholesterol efflux from HepG2 cells
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 527 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. L. Dixon, S. Shen, J. P. Vuchetich, E. Wysocka, G. Y. Sun, and M. Sturek
Increased atherosclerosis in diabetic dyslipidemic swine: protection by atorvastatin involves decreased VLDL triglycerides but minimal effects on the lipoprotein profile
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2002; 43(10): 1618 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. D. Sniderman, T. Scantlebury, and K. Cianflone
Hypertriglyceridemic HyperapoB: The Unappreciated Atherogenic Dyslipoproteinemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Ann Intern Med, September 18, 2001; 135(6): 447 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
G. F. Watts, F. M. Riches, S. E. Humphries, P. J. Talmud, and F. M. van Bockxmeer
Genotypic associations of the hepatic secretion of VLDL apolipoprotein B-100 in obesity
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2000; 41(3): 481 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. C. Y. Chang, N. Sakashita, K. Ornvold, O. Lee, E. T. Chang, R. Dong, S. Lin, C.-Y. G. Lee, S. C. Strom, R. Kashyap, et al.
Immunological Quantitation and Localization of ACAT-1 and ACAT-2 in Human Liver and Small Intestine
J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2000; 275(36): 28083 - 28092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. K. Spady, M. N. Willard, and R. S. Meidell
Role of Acyl-Coenzyme A:Cholesterol Acyltransferase-1 in the Control of Hepatic Very Low Density Lipoprotein Secretion and Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Expression in the Mouse and Hamster
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2000; 275(35): 27005 - 27012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sniderman, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sniderman, A. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biochemistry and metabolism
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology