Thrombosis |
From the Institut des Vaisseaux et du Sang (J.-P.B., C.B., P.A., L.D.) and Service dAnatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques (J.-P.B.), Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France; the University of North Carolina (T.E.), Chapel Hill; INSERM U 353 (J.R., G.P., P.A., L.D.), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France; Laboratoire dHématologie (J.R.), Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches France; LEPSD-INRA (M.B.), Jouy en Josas, France; CEA-INRA (M.V.), Jouy en Josas, France; Laboratoire de Physiologie (P.H.) and Centre Médico-chirurgical Hôpital Marie Lannelongue (G.M.M.), Le Plessis Robinson, France; and Angio-hématologie (L.D.), Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Correspondence to Dr Jean-Philippe Brouland, Service dAnatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75475 Paris Cédex 10, France. E-mail jean-philippe.brouland{at}lrb.ap-hop-paris.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endothelial cells lung transplantation von Willebrand factor immunohistochemistry pigs
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vWF is a large multimeric glycoprotein synthesized by ECs and megakaryocytes.9 It is present in bloodboth in plasma and inside plateletsand in ECs and the matrix of the blood vessel wall. vWF is synthesized as a large pro-vWF that dimerizes in the endoplasmic reticulum and multimerizes in the Golgi apparatus, in which acidic pH conditions10 necessary for the multimerization process are present.11 In ECs, the largest vWF multimers are stored in endothelium-specific organelles called Weibel-Palade (WP) bodies.12 13
vWF can be released through 2 different pathways: (1) a constitutive secretory pathway where vWF is liberated from both cellular sides, luminal and abluminal, in the plasma and subendothelial matrix and (2) a storage pool, with inducible release, where the highest molecular forms of vWF are stored in the WP bodies. This adhesive glycoprotein, of nonhepatic origin, is involved in platelet adhesion to connective tissues and exposed subendothelium14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 and in platelet aggregation.25 26 In the plasma, it binds and protects coagulation factor VIII from proteolytic degradation.27
Although plasma vWF is a widely accepted marker of endothelial activation, there are still few studies describing the regulation of vWF expression by ECs in pathological disorders.5 28 29 In nonpathological states, the regulation of EC vWF expression has been observed in pigs to be modulated by age and the location of the vascular bed.30 31 32 33
The regulation of vWF synthesis and release in the plasma is still incompletely understood. The basal plasma vWF variations, physiological and pathological, may result from changes in the constitutive pathway and/or stimulation of release from the regulated pathway. In vitro, vWF released from WP bodies is found after stimulation by various substances, such as thrombin,34 histamine,35 fibrin,36 37 and platelet-activating factor, and by complement components and oxidative stress.38 In vivo, in humans, plasma vWF level is increased in response to substances that raise cAMP levels, such as endotoxin,39 epinephrine,40 and desmopressin. This increase in plasma vWF is thought to be due to the release of vWF from WP bodies.
Pigs with von Willebrand disease (vWD) exhibit a recessive autosomal disease41 42 phenotypically identical to the human vWD type 3.43 44 The homozygous form is characterized by an increased bleeding time that is due to levels of plasma, platelet, endothelial, and subendothelial vWF lower than the limits of detection and the subsequent decrease of plasma levels of factor VIII.
The lungs are very rich in ECs, and pig lung ECs exhibit a striking and interesting heterogeneity of vWF expression.31 Thus, ECs from pulmonary artery and veins and from mucosal and peribronchial capillaries strongly express vWF, whereas ECs from alveolar capillaries, which represent the major mass of lung ECs, either do not express vWF or express vWF very weakly.31
This peculiar feature and the fact that the majority of plasma vWF originates from ECs45 prompted us to develop an original animal model based on various combinations of swine leukocyte antigen (SLA)-compatible single lung transplantations between normal and vWD pigs in order to study in vivo the synthesis and release of EC vWF.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thirteen normal pigs were used as lung donors, and 3 normal and 10 homozygous vWD pigs were used as recipients for left lung allotransplantations. The transplants were performed between SLA-identical pigs in 12 cases (Nos. 1 to 12) and between SLA-incompatible normal pigs in 1 case (No. 13) to assess the effects of complete SLA incompatibility on endothelium. Additionally, 1 normal pig underwent left pneumonectomy to evaluate the effect of pneumonectomy on plasma vWF level (No. 14).
Left Single Lung Allotransplantation
Surgery was performed in the Laboratoire de Chirurgie
Experimentale of Hôpital Marie-Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson,
France. Transplantations were performed between pigs with similar
weight to avoid difficulties resulting from lung size.
Anesthesia was performed as described previously47 to avoid any hematologic changes in pigs. Donors were intubated and ventilated. After sternotomy and opening of the pleura and pericardium, 400 mL of whole blood was retrieved for blood transfusion to recipients. The aorta was cross-clamped, and the lungs were flushed with 2 L cold modified Euro-Collins solution (70 mL of 50% dextrose and 8 mEq MgSO4/L) immediately after injection of 500 mg iloprost. The heart was excised, then both lungs were removed, and the left lung was stored inflated in cold modified Euro-Collins solution. Left lung transplantation was performed in recipients through a left thoracotomy by continuous suturing of the left pulmonary artery and left atrial cuff with the use of Mersilene (Davis & Geck) and interrupted suturing of the bronchus with 30 Maxon and Dexon II (Davis & Geck). Systemic bronchial artery flow was not restored.
Antibiotic (ampicillin, 0.1 g/kg for 24 hours) and analgesic (morphine) therapy was given for 5 days after surgery. In the immediate postoperative period, homozygous vWD pigs received 50 U/kg purified vWF concentrate (kindly provided by Dr J. Savage from Porton Speywood, Ltd, Birmingham, UK) and red blood cells from SLA-compatible donors. No immunosuppressive therapy was instituted.
Technetium Scintigraphy
Exploration of the lung transplant circulation was performed by
use of gamma scintigraphy (Maxicamera 2, General Electric,
and Pericolor 1000, Numelec) after intravenous infusion of
technetium Tc 99mlabeled albumin microspheres
(1 mCi/10 kg, International Cis).
vWF Antigen Determination
Plasma vWF antigen was assessed by ELISA33 using a
monospecific rabbit anti-pig vWF antibody kindly provided by Dr Amiral
from Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France. One unit of
vWF activity was defined as the amount present in 1 mL of normal
pig pooled plasma.
vWF Multimeric Structure
vWF multimer analysis was carried out by
horizontal SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis using 1% agarose gels. A
rabbit anti-human vWF antiserum (No. A082, DAKO), which strongly
cross-reacts with porcine vWF, was used as the primary antibody.
Alkaline phosphataseconjugated affinity-purified goat anti-rabbit IgG
(Axell Accurate Chemical and Scientific Corp) was used as the secondary
antibody. Staining was carried out with a nitro blue tetrazolium
chloride/bromochloro indolyl phosphate substrate system.
SLA Determination
SLA class 1 was determined by serology. Compatibility in class 2
was ascertained by mixed lymphocyte culture.46 48
Bleeding Time
Saline ear bleeding time was measured according to
Mertz.49 Briefly, the marginal edge of the ear was quickly
transfixed (standardized incision of 3 mm length through the
entire thickness of the ear) with a surgical blade (No. 11). The ear
was immediately placed into a beaker containing 500 mL of citrated
saline solution (20 mmol/L sodium citrate and 150 mmol/L
NaCl) at 37°C. Time was recorded at the end of bleeding as 30
minutes if bleeding had not spontaneously stopped by this time.
Histological Study
Histological examination was performed on
3-µm paraffin sections stained by hematoxylin-eosin-saffron and
Massons trichrome. Lung rejection was evaluated according to 2
histological classifications.50 51
Immunohistochemistry of vWF
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 3-µm tissue sections by
the indirect alkaline phosphatase antialkaline phosphatase (APAAP)
method52 with fast-red TR salt (DAKO APAAP kit, system 40,
K670) used for development or by the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex
method with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine used for development. A polyclonal
rabbit anti-human vWF (No. A082, DAKO) cross-reacting with porcine vWF
(according to DAKO specifications and personal data31 ) and
diluted to 1/400 was used. Omission of primary antibody was used as a
negative control. For homogeneity of labeling, immunohistochemistry was
performed with an automatic immunostainer (Histostainer,
Leica).
Quantification
Intensity of labeling was semiquantitatively evaluated according
to a 0 to 4 graded scale: 0 indicates no staining; 1, very weak
staining, only perceptible at x40 magnification; 2, weak staining,
perceptible at x25 magnification; 3, moderate staining, perceptible at
x10 magnification; and 4, strong staining, perceptible at x2.5
magnification. Heterogeneity of the labeling was
designated "v" when labeling varied from vessel to vessel and
"Sc" when scattered positive cells were disseminated among negative
blood vessels.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Technetium perfusion scintigraphy was performed in transplanted vWD pigs 2 and 5 at day 23 and day 72, respectively, and in the normal transplanted pig 8 at day 64, which confirmed normal perfusion of the left transplanted lung.
Autopsy Findings
In pigs 3, 5, 6, and 7, portions of the left lung were reduced
to necrotic material surrounded by a thick fibrous wall.
Transplantation failure was due to stenosis of the left
bronchial anastomosis and/or of the left pulmonary artery
and/or pulmonary veins.
In other transplanted pigs (Nos. 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13), sutures of the left bronchus, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary veins were unremarkable, and the lung parenchyma was macroscopically normal or with little foci of edema but without any foci of necrosis. These animals successfully transplanted were used for histological and immunologic studies.
Histological Examination
In control lungs (explanted recipient left lungs and donor right
lungs), minor pathological changes of lung parenchyma were observed.
Thus, some foci of edematous alveolitis were seen; these were probably
due to surgery. Moreover, bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue was
particularly well developed.53 It was organized as
peribronchiolar groups of small lymphocytes, sometimes forming lymphoid
nodules, or as small heterogeneous lymphocyte aggregates in
alveolar walls.
After Transplantation
In the recipient native right lung, foci of edematous alveolitis
with macrophages were more numerous and bronchus-associated
lymphoid tissue was as much developed as in control lungs.
SLA-Compatible Transplanted Left Lungs
Lungs from pigs 2, 4, and 8, killed at days 71, 48, and 64,
respectively, exhibited the same histological features
as control lungs.
In pigs 9, 11, and 12, killed at days 22, 18, and 38, respectively, foci of acute alveolitis and perivascular lymphocyte infiltrates were found and were sufficient to diagnose minor acute lung rejection grade 1 according to Clelland et al50 or grade A1a-A1ac according to Youssem et al.51
SLA-Incompatible Transplanted Left Lung
Pig 13, killed at day 6, exhibited histological
signs of severe acute lung rejection grade 3 (Clelland et
al50 ) or grade A3ac (Youssem et al51 ) with
perivascular and peribronchiolar infiltrates of small lymphocytes
admixed with some immunoblasts, extending in the alveolar septa. This
was associated with extensive foci of alveolitis.
Plasma vWF
Normal Pigs After Left Pneumonectomy
Before pneumonectomy, plasma vWF level was 100 U/dL. After lung
removal, plasma vWF decreased in the first postoperative days to reach
a plateau of 86 U/dL (-14%).
Normal Pigs Transplanted With SLA-Compatible Normal Lung (Pigs 8
and 12)
In pig 8, without sign of rejection, plasma vWF increased during
the 8 days after transplantation (+61%) and then slowly recovered to
the normal initial value (Figure 1
). In
pig 12, with minor histological signs of rejection,
plasma vWF increased during the first postoperative day (+ 39%) and
then decreased to a lower value (-24%) (Figure 1
).
|
Homozygous vWD Pigs Transplanted With SLA-Compatible Normal Lung
(Pigs 2, 4, 9, and 11)
Plasma vWF level increased in the postoperative hours and
appeared to have a partially corrected vWF defect, which was presumably
due to the infusion of vWF concentrate to reduce
perioperative blood loss. Then, plasma vWF level
decreased to reach a low but significantly detectable plateau of 6.4
and 6.2 U/dL in cases without minor histological sign
of rejection (pigs 2 and 4, respectively) and 4.8 and 2 U/dL in cases
with minor rejection (pigs 9 and 11, respectively) (Figure 2
).
|
Normal Pig Transplanted With SLA-Incompatible Normal Lung (Pig
13)
In pig 13, plasma vWF level increased in the first postoperative
hours from 88 to 108 U/dL and then recovered normal initial value (82
U/dL).
vWF Multimers
vWF multimeric analysis was performed in normal
donors, in vWD recipients before transplantation, and in transplanted
vWD pigs 1 and 2 months after lung transplantation (Figure 3
).
|
In normal donors, full ranges of vWF multimers with normal distribution were found. In vWD recipients, no detectable vWF was found. In the postoperative period, all types of vWF multimers were detected with a normal pattern. In successful transplantations (pigs 2 and 9), all ranges of vWF multimers with a normal distribution were detected 1 and 2 months after transplantation. The failed transplantation (pig 6) exhibited only traces of vWF, with a deficit in high molecular weight multimers.
Bleeding Time
In normal pigs transplanted with SLA-compatible or -incompatible
normal lungs and in the normal pig after pneumonectomy, bleeding time
was normal (<5 minutes) and remained normal (<5 minutes).
In homozygous vWD pigs transplanted with SLA-compatible normal lung, bleeding time lasted >30 minutes and was not changed by the transplantation of normal lung containing vWF.
Immunohistochemistry of vWF
Normal Pig Lungs (Control Lungs)
All ECs from peribronchial and mucosal capillaries and veins
exhibited strong granular intracytoplasmic labeling for vWF. Except for
ECs from pulmonary arteries, which were strongly stained, ECs
from arteries displayed heterogeneous staining for vWF,
characterized by moderate granular cytoplasmic labeling of equal
intensity of sparsely stained ECs disseminated among negative ones. All
pulmonary artery ECs displayed strong labeling.
Pulmonary capillary ECs were moderately to weakly stained, with
variation from one EC to another and from one blood vessel to another.
Alveolar capillary ECs, which represent the major EC mass in
the lung, stained weakly or not at all.
vWD Pig Lung
No significant labeling of vWF could be detected.
Normal SLA-Compatible Transplanted Lungs (Pigs 2, 4, 8, 9, 11,
and 12)
In pigs 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, and 12, vWF was detected in the same
location as in control lungs, but the intensity of labeling was weaker
and more heterogeneous. As in control lungs, ECs of
peribronchial and mucosal capillaries expressed the greatest amount of
vWF (Figure 4
, panels a and b).
|
Normal SLA Incompatible Transplanted Lung (Pig 13)
In pig 13, vWF was detected in the same locations as in control
lungs. The intensity of EC labeling was stronger and more diffuse than
in control lungs (Figure 4
, panels c and d).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initially, the effect of left lung removal on plasma level of vWF was evaluated. Left pneumonectomy induced a prolonged decrease of plasma vWF (-14%). This provided 2 types of information: vWF production by remnant ECs cannot compensate for the deficit, and basal plasma vWF probably depends on the mass of secretory ECs.
In successful lung transplantations, including SLA-incompatible transplantation, ECs are morphologically intact, and their function, reflected by vWF production and normal multimeric plasma vWF pattern, is preserved, indicating that ECs are viable after transplantation.
One of the peculiarities of this model is the use of SLA-compatible pigs, which allows deletion of immunosuppressive therapy, which is toxic for ECs and may affect vWF synthesis.55 In these conditions, even in the absence of signs of clinical rejection, features of minor histological rejection were observed in 3 of the 6 successful lung transplantations. This indicates that SLA-compatible pigs may develop minor rejection and that systems other than SLA (minor early antigens) are involved in the occurrence of minimal histological rejection.
In the present study, the EC vWF production was modulated differently according to the relation of donor to recipient. In SLA-compatible normal lungs transplanted to normal pigs or to vWD pigs, the EC vWF storage poolreflected by a decrease of vWF EC contentwas excreted and/or deviated to the constitutive secretory pathway. Moreover, when a normal lung was transplanted to a vWD pig, there was no recruitment of ECs that initially did not secrete vWF, in order to palliate vWF deficiency.
In SLA-compatible transplantations without histological signs of rejection, EC vWF excretion was able to maintain normal plasma vWF levels in the case of transplantation between normal pigs (No. 8) and to partially correct plasma vWF level in transplanted vWD pigs (Nos. 2 and 4), in the amount expected from the transplanted tissue only.
In lungs with minor histological signs of rejection, an alteration of vWF synthesis with probable constitutive pathway alteration was suggested, in view of the fact that plasma vWF levels were slightly decreased in the case of transplantation between normal pigs (No. 12) and partial correction of plasma vWF level was less apparent (Nos. 9 and 11) than in lungs exhibiting no rejection (Nos. 2 and 4).
Thus, this model allows the investigation of the vWF secretory functions of ECs when they are transplanted into another animal, notably devoid of vWF.
Because of their location, ECs play an important role in graft rejection. Just after an organ transplant, antigenic determinants associated with major histocompatibility complex of the donor stimulate T lymphocytes of the recipient to induce immunologic reactions that can lead to graft rejection. During graft rejection, ECs of the transplanted organ may act as an active participant or as an immune target. As a target, they are the first cells exposed to humoral factors and are in contact with circulating leukocytes of the immunocompetent recipient. As an active participant of graft immune reaction, ECs can interact with recipient leukocytes, initiating recruitment of recipient immunocompetent cells.56 Several steps are necessary for this recruitment: (1) accumulation of effective cells in the graft microcirculation, (2) adhesion of effective cells to ECs, and (3) migration of immune cells into the surrounding connective tissue. In all these steps, an important role seems to be played by adhesion molecules and cytokines.2 3 4
In incompatible lung transplantation between normal pigs, histological signs of severe rejection were found, as expected. ECs were morphologically normal, and their activation was reflected by an increased vWF EC content, as has been described in ECs of human endomyocardial biopsies.4 This feature is observed only in ECs that initially produced vWF; there is no recruitment of other ECs even if they are activated. This was not associated with a rise of plasma vWF and argues that the release of vWF from ECs in the plasma is regulated to stay in the normal range and that the constitutive pathway is probably deviated to the storage pathway.
vWF, and notably plasma vWF, has been demonstrated to be involved in the arrest of bleeding in pigs.57 Absence of bleeding time correction in homozygous vWD-transplanted pigs may be due to insufficient increase of plasma vWF and, subsequently, of coagulation factor VIII and/or lack of plasma vWF incorporation in vWD pig platelets, as previously reported in a bone marrow graft model.58
Pigs have been used for the evaluation of various surgical techniques59 and for the study of mechanisms of rejection, such as obliterans bronchiolitis.60 The present study demonstrates that vWD pigs can be used in major surgical protocols, such as lung transplantation, if they are blood- and vWF-substituted in the operative period.
In this transplantation protocol, circulation of bronchial arteries was not restored, although peribronchial, mucosal, and submucosal capillaries were lined by viable and morphologically unaltered ECs. The fact that ECs from bronchial-dependent circulation keep their vWF expression and react as ECs from pulmonary-dependent circulation argues in favor of preservation of the function of this circulation. This may be related to the presence of pulmonary-systemic collaterals in successful transplantations. Lack of or poor development of this circulation may explain the occurrence of bronchial stenoses and subsequent transplantation failure. Restoration of bronchial-dependent circulation, substitutive transplantation of omentum around the bronchial suture area, or the use of metallic stents may overcome this problem, as described in humans.61 62 63
Finally, the present study demonstrates that pig lung transplantation is a good model for studying the regulation of EC synthesis in vivo because, physiologically, pig lung ECs exhibit a striking heterogeneity of vWF expression between pulmonary and bronchial circulations.
In both compatible and incompatible successful transplantations, ECs maintain viability and function reflected by their ability to produce vWF, even if they are transplanted into an animal devoid of vWF. The vWF constitutive and storage pathways are modulated differently according to transplantation compatibility and to the severity of histological signs of rejection. This model provides a good approach to understand the regulation of vWF by ECs after transplantation, but it cannot be directly extrapolated to the EC regulation of vWF in human organ transplantation because, besides species differences, humans receive immunosuppressive treatment, which may be toxic to ECs.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 20, 1999; accepted June 3, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Hoffmann MW, Wonigeit K, Steinhoff G, Herzbeck H, Flad HD, Pichlmayr R. Production of cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1-beta) and endothelial cell activation in human liver allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1993;55:329335.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Mantovani A, Bussolini F, Introna M. Cytokine regulation of endothelial cell function: from molecular level to the bedside. Immunol Today. 1997;18:231240.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Salom RN, Maguire JA, Hancock WW. Endothelial activation and cytokine expression in human acute cardiac allograft rejection. Pathology. 1998;30:2429.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Blann AD, Jackson P, Bath PM, Watts GP. von Willebrand factor, a possible indicator of endothelial cell damage, decreases during long-term compliance with a lipid-lowering diet. J Intern Med. 1995;237:557561.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Hoyer LW, De los Santos RP, Hoyer JR. Antihemophilic factor antigen: localization in endothelial cells by immunofluorescent microscopy. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:27372744.
7. Jaffe EA, Hoyer LW, Nachman RL. Synthesis of antihemophilic factor antigen by cultured human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:27572764.
8.
Lip GHY, Blann AD. von Willebrand factor and
its relevance to cardiovascular disorders. Br
Heart J. 1995;74:580583.
9. Verweij CL. Biosynthesis of human von Willebrand factor. Haemostasis. 1988;18:224245.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Mayadas TN, Wagner DD. In vitro multimerization
of von Willebrand factor is triggered by low pH: importance of
the propolypeptide and free sulfhydryls. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:1349713503.
11.
Vischer UM, Wagner DD. von Willebrand factor
proteolytic processing and multimerization precede the
formation of Weibel-Palade bodies. Blood. 1994;83:35363544.
12. Wagner D. The Weibel-Palade body: the storage granule for von Willebrand factor and P-selectin. Thromb Haemost. 1993;70:105110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Weibel EA, Palade GE. New cytoplasmic components in
arteria endothelia. J Cell Biol. 1964;23:101112.
14. Legrand YJ, Rodriguez-Zeballos A, Kartalis G, Fauvel F, Caen JP. Adsorption of factor VIII antigen-activity complex by collagen. Thromb Res. 1978;13:909911.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Morton LF, Griffin B, Pepper DS, Barnes MJ. The interaction between collagens and factor VIII/von Willebrand factor: investigation of the structural requirements for interaction. Thromb Res. 1983;32:545556.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Pietu G, Fressinaud E, Girma JP, Nieuwenhuis HK, Rothschild C, Meyer D. Binding of human von Willebrand factor to collagen and to collagen-stimulated platelets. J Lab Clin Med. 1987;109:637646.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Rand J, Sussman I, Gordon R, Chu S, Solomon V.
Localization of factor VIII-related antigen in human vascular
subendothelium. Blood. 1980;55:752.
18. Rand JH, Wu XX, Potter BJ, Uson RR, Gordon RE. Co-localization of von Willebrand factor and type VI collagen in human vascular subendothelium. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:843850.[Abstract]
19.
Ross JM, McIntire LV, Moake JL, Rand JH. Platelet
adhesion and aggregation on human type VI collagen surfaces under
physiological flow conditions. Blood. 1995;85:18261835.
20.
Sakariassen KS, Fressinaud E, Girma JP, Baumgartner HR,
Meyer D. Mediation of platelet adhesion to fibrillar collagen in
flowing blood by proteolytic fragment of human vWF. Blood. 1986;67:15151518.
21. Santoro SA. Adsorption of von Willebrand factor/factor VIII by the genetically distinct interstitial collagens. Thromb Res. 1981;21:689693.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Scott DM, Griffin B, Pepper DS, Barnes MJ. The binding of purified factor VIII/von Willebrand factor to collagens of differing type and form. Thromb Res. 1981;24:467472.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Wagner DD. Cell biology of von Willebrand factor. Ann Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:217246.
24.
Wagner DD, Urban-Pickering M, Marder VJ. von
Willebrand protein binds to extracellular matrices
independently of collagen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:471475.
25. Goto S, Ikeda Y, Saldivar E, Ruggeri ZM. Distinct mechanisms of platelet aggregation as a consequence of different shearing flow conditions. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:479486.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ikeda Y, Handa M, Kawano K, Kamata T, Murata M, Araki Y, Anbo H, Kawai Y, Watanabe K, Itagaki I, Sakai K, Ruggeri ZM. The role of von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen in platelet aggregation under varying shear stress. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:12341240.
27.
Wise RJ, Dorner AJ, Krane M, Pittman DD, Kaufman RJ.
The role of von Willebrand factor multimers and
propeptide cleavage in binding and stabilization of factor VIII.
J Biol Chem. 1991;266:2194821955.
28. McGill SN, Ahmed NA, Christou NV. Increased plasma von Willebrand factor in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome is derived from generalized endothelial cell activation. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:296300.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Nichols TC, Bellinger DA, Reddick RL, Smith SV, Koch
GG, Davis K, Sigman J, Brinhous KM, Griggs TR, Read MS. The roles of
Willebrand factor and factor VIII in arterial thrombosis:
studies in canine von Willebrand disease and haemophilia A.
Blood. 1993;81:26442651.
30. Bahnak BR, Wu QY, Coulombel L, Assouline Z, Kerbiriou-Nabias D, Pietu G, Drouet L, Caen JP, Meyer D. Expression of von Willebrand factor in porcine vessels: heterogeneity at the level of von Willebrand factor mRNA. J Cell Physiol. 1989;138:305310.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Brouland J-P, Gilbert MA, Bonneau M, Pignaud G, Bal dit Solier C, Drouet LO. Macro and microheterogeneity in normal endothelial cells: differential composition of luminal glycocalyx and functional implications. Endothelium. 1999;6:251262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Gebrane-Younes J, Drouet L, Caen JP, Orcel L. Heterogeneous distribution of Weibel-Palade bodies and von Willebrand factor along the porcine vascular tree. Am J Pathol. 1991;139:14711484.[Abstract]
33. Wu QY, Drouet L, Carrier JL, Rotshild C, Berard M, Rouault C, Caen JP, Meyer D. Differential distribution of von Willebrand factor in endothelial cells: comparison between normal pigs and pigs with von Willebrand disease. Arteriosclerosis. 1987;7:4754.[Abstract]
34.
Mayadas T, Wagner DD, Simpson PJ. von
Willebrand factor biosynthesis and partitioning between
constitutive and regulated pathways of secretion after thrombin
stimulation. Blood. 1989;73:706711.
35. Hamilton KK, Sims PJ. Changes in cytosolic Ca2+ associated with von Willebrand factor release in human endothelial cells exposed to histamine. J Clin Invest. 1987;79:600608.
36. Ribes JA, Francis CW, Wagner DD. Fibrin induces release of von Willebrand factor from endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1987;79:117123.
37. Ribes JA, Ni F, Wagner DD, Francis CW. Mediation of fibrin-induced release of von Willebrand factor from cultured endothelial cells by fibrin beta chain. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:435442.
38. Sporn LA, Marder VJ, Wagner DD. Inducible secretion of large, biologically potent von Willebrand factor multimers. Cell. 1986;46:185190.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Gralnick HR, McKeown LP, Wilson OM, Williams SB, Elin RJ. von Willebrand factor release induced by endotoxin. J Lab Clin Med. 1989;113:118122.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Vischer UM, Wolheim CB. Epinephrine induces von Willebrand factor release from cultured endothelial cells: involvement of cyclic AMP-dependent signalling in exocytosis. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77:11821188.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Bahou WF, Bowie EJW, Fass DN, Ginsberg D. Molecular
genetic analysis of porcine von Willebrand disease:
tight linkage to the von Willebrand factor locus.
Blood. 1988;72:308313.
42.
Griggs TR, Webster WP, Cooper HA, Wagner RH, Brinkhous
KM. von Willebrand factor: gene dosage relationship and
transfusion response in bleeder swine; a new bioassay. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71:20872090.
43. Sadler JE, Matsushita T, Dong Z, Tuley EA, Westfield LA. Molecular mechanism and classification of von Willebrand disease. Thromb Haemost. 1995;74:161166.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Zimmerman TS, Ruggeri ZM. von Willebrand disease. Hum Pathol. 1987;18:140152.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Nichols TC, Samama CM, Bellinger DA, Roussi J, Reddick
RL, Bonneau M, Read MS, Baillard O, Koch GG, Vaiman M, Sigman JL,
Pignaud GA, Brinkhous KM, Griggs TR, Drouet L. Function of von
Willebrand factor after crossed marrow transplantation between
normal and von Willebrand disease pigs: effect on
arterial thrombosis in chimeras. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1995;92:24552459.
46. Vaiman M. Histocompatibility system in pigs. Prog Vet Microbiol Immun. 1988;4:108133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Roussi J, André P, Samama M, Pignaud G, Bonneau M, Laporte A, Drouet L. Platelet functions and haemostasis parameters in pigs: absence of side effects of a procedure of general anaesthesia. Thromb Res. 1996;81:297305.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Renard CH, Kristensen B, Gautshi C, Hruban V, Fredholm M, Vaiman M. Joint report of the first international comparison test of swine lymphocyte alloantigens (SLA). Anim Genet. 1988;19:6372.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Mertz ET. The anomaly of a normal Dukes and very
prolonged saline bleeding time in swine suffering from an inherited
bleeding disease. Am J Physiol. 1942;136:360362.
50. Clelland CA, Higenbottam TW, Stewart S, Scott JP, Wallwork J. The histological changes in transbronchial biopsy after treatment of acute lung rejection in heart-lung transplants. J Pathol. 1990;161:105112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Youssem SA, Berry GJ, Brunt EM, Chamberlain D, Hruban R, Sibley R, Stewart S, Tazelaar H. A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: lung rejection study group. J Heart Transplant. 1990;9:593601.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Cordell JL, Falami B, Erber WN, Ghosh A, Abdulaziz Z, MacDonald S, Pulford KAF, Stein H, Mason DY. Immunoenzymatic labeling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes). Histochem Cytochem. 1984;32:219223.[Abstract]
53. Pabst R, Gehrke I. Is the bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT) an integral structure of the lung in normal mammals, including humans? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1990;3:131135.
54. Roussi J, Samama M, Vaiman M, Nichols T, Pignaud G, Bonneau M, Sigman J, De Castro H, Griggs T, Drouet L. An experimental model for testing von Willebrand factor function: successful SLA-matched crossed bone marrow transplantations between normal and von Willebrand pigs. Exp Hematol. 1996;24:585591.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Verbeke M, Van de Voorde J, de Ridder I, Lameire N. Regional differences in vasculotoxic effects of cyclosporin in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995;73:16611668.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Luscinskas FW, Gimbrone MA. Endothelial-dependent mechanisms in chronic inflammatory leukocytes recruitment. Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:413421.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. André P, Brouland J-P, Roussi J, Bonneau M, Pignaud G, Bal Dit Sollier C, Hainaud P, Vaiman M, Drouet L. Role of plasma and platelet von Willebrand factor in arterial thrombogenesis and haemostasis in the pig. Exp Hematol. 1998;26:620626.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58.
Roussi J, Drouet L, Sigman J, Vaiman M, Pignaud G,
Bonneau M, Masse JM, Cramer E. Absence of incorporation of plasma von
Willebrand factor into porcine platelet
-granules.
Br J Haematol. 1995;90:661668.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
59.
Macchiarini P, Lenot B, de Montpreville V, Dulmet E,
Mazmanian GM, Fattal M, Guiard F, Chapelier A, Dartevelle P.
Heterotopic pig model for direct revascularization
and venous drainage of tracheal allografts: Paris-Sud University lung
transplantation group. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108:10661075.
60. al-Dossari GA, Kshettry VR, Jessurun J, Bolman RM. Experimental large-animal of obliterative bronchiolitis after lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:3439.[Abstract]
61.
Norgaard MA, Olsen PS, Svendsen UG, Pettersen G.
Revascularization of the bronchial arteries in lung
transplantation: an overview. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:12151221.
62. Pettersson G, Norgaard MA, Arendrup H, Brandenhof P, Helvind M, Joyce F, Stentoft P, Olensen PS, Thiis JJ, Efsen F, Mortensen SA, Svendsen UG. Direct bronchial artery revascularization and en bloc double lung transplantation: surgical techniques and early outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997;16:320333.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63.
Susanto I, Peters JI, Levine SM, Sako EY, Anzueto A,
Bryan CL. Use of balloon-expandable metallic stents in the management
of bronchial stenosis and bronchomalacia after lung
transplantation. Chest. 1998;114:13301335.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Choi, K. Aboulfatova, H. J. Pownall, R. Cook, and J.-f. Dong Shear-induced Disulfide Bond Formation Regulates Adhesion Activity of von Willebrand Factor J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 35604 - 35611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Wilkes, T. M. Egan, and H. Y. Reynolds Lung Transplantation: Opportunities for Research and Clinical Advancement Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2005; 172(8): 944 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Kang, G. Lee, J. Y. Kim, S. H. Lee, H. C. Wi, P. G. Hwang, D. H. Chung, and Y. T. Kim Pre-treatment of donor with 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin could alleviate early failure of porcine xenograft in a cobra venom factor treated canine recipient Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 28(1): 149 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Ray, D. A. Morrow, C. M. Gibson, S. Murphy, E. M. Antman, E. Braunwald, and for the ENTIRE-TIMI 23 Study Group Predictors of the rise in vWF after ST elevation myocardial infarction: implications for treatment strategies and clinical outcome: An ENTIRE-TIMI 23 substudy Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2005; 26(5): 440 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |