Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Medicine (B.C.Y., J.L.M.), Physiology (M.I.P., D.M., H.M., L.S., J.L.M.), and Pediatrics (P.M.), University of Florida, College of Medicine, and the VA Medical Center (J.L.M.), Gainesville, Fla.
Correspondence to J.L. Mehta, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 Archer Rd, PO Box 100277 JHMHC, Gainesville, FL 32610. E-mail jmehta{at}ufl.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: aorta atherosclerosis angiotensin II endothelium hypercholesterolemia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rakugi et al7 demonstrated induction of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in the neointima of injured blood vessels and speculated on its possible role in restenosis after angioplasty. Viswanathan et al8 described increased Ang II receptor expression in the neointima after vascular injury, which would facilitate the action of Ang II. ACE has also been found in vascular smooth muscle cells in intimal lesions and in macrophages and vascular smooth muscle cells in the fibroproliferative lesion of human atherosclerotic plaques from atherectomy, surgical, and postmortem specimens.6 It is, therefore, possible that excessive Ang II synthesis, activity, or receptor expression contributes to the initiation or progression of atherosclerosis.
Abnormally high serum cholesterol levels are thought to be an important pathogenic factor in atherogenesis.9 An inherited form of hypercholesterolemia leads to early atherosclerosis in rabbits.10 Feeding of a high-cholesterol diet to rabbits often results in hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis.11 Although the extent of atherosclerosis in different blood vessels of rabbits fed a high-cholesterol diet varies significantly, this model has been used extensively to study pathogenetic aspects of atherosclerosis and its modulation by various agents.11 12 13 The current study was designed to examine Ang II receptor expression in vascular tissues and its relationship with vasoreactivity and atherogenesis in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis induced by feeding of a high-cholesterol diet.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 kg weight) were housed
individually under temperature-controlled conditions. During the 2-week
period of adaptation, the rabbits were fed standard rabbit chow and
water ad libitum. Food intake was assessed on a daily basis. After
stabilization, the rabbits were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2
regimens for 10 weeks: (1) standard rabbit chow (control group, n=8) or
(2) cholesterol-enriched rabbit chow (1%
cholesterol plus 4% coconut oil mixed with regular chow;
high cholesteroldiet group, n=12). Only male rabbits were
used to avoid the variability secondary to sex differences in this
experimental model. A rabbit chow containing 1%
cholesterol and 4% coconut oil diet was chosen because
other investigators have demonstrated that when given for a period of
10 to 12 weeks, it results in marked elevation in serum
cholesterol and induction of diffuse, aortic
atherosclerosis.11 12 13 At the end of the 10-week dietary intervention, food was withdrawn for 12 hours, and the rabbits were weighed and then anesthetized with intravenous sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg). Venous blood samples were obtained for measurement of serum cholesterol, and aortas were excised for examination of atherosclerotic area (aorta), Ang II receptor binding, and determination of vasoreactivity. The total RNA was extracted from aortas from treated and untreated animals and analyzed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The study was approved by the appropriate animal research committees of the University of Florida and complied with the American Physiological Society guidelines.
Determination of Serum Cholesterol
Serum was analyzed for total cholesterol by
an automatic analyzer at a commercial laboratory (Doctors'
Laboratory, Valdosta, Ga).
Determination of the Extent of Atherosclerosis
After dissection, the entire aorta (except the ascending part)
was removed, opened longitudinally, and prepared for detection and
quantification of areas of sudanophilia as directed by Holman et
al.14 The aortic strips were immersed in 10%
buffered formalin solution for 24 hours and then rinsed briefly in 70%
alcohol. The tissues was immersed in Herxheimer's solution that
contained 5 g Sudan IV, 500 mL of 70% ethyl alcohol, and 500 mL
acetone at room temperature for 15 minutes. The aortas were then
transferred to 80% alcohol for 20 minutes, washed in running water for
1 hour, and then mounted and photographed. Aortic
atherosclerosis was determined by planimetry of the
distribution of sudanophilia in the photographs and expressed as
percent of aortic area.
Determination of Ang II Receptor Binding by
Autoradiography
Aortic Ang II receptor expression was determined as Ang II
receptor binding by autoradiography. Ascending aortas
were frozen on dry ice. Multiple 20-µm-thick transverse sections were
cut at -20°C, mounted onto chrome-alum-gelatincoated slides, and
incubated with 250 to 300 pmol/L 125I-Sar-Ile-Ang
II for 2 hours in 10 mmol/L sodium biphosphate buffer or buffer
containing 10 µmol/L of the Ang II receptor blocker
[Sar1, Val5 ,
Ala8]-Ang II, 10 µmol/L of the
AT2 receptor blocker PD123,177, or 10
µmol/L of the AT1 blocker losartan. The
sections were washed in buffer and dried.
Autoradiograms were generated by apposition of
slide-mounted tissue sections with x-ray film
(Hyperfilm-3H, Amersham) for 3 weeks.
Densitometric analysis of the autoradiographs was carried out
with Image Systems equipment (MCID M1 software with Tk/M1 turnkey
system with an 80486, 33-MHz computer; Imaging Research,
Inc).15 16 17
Determination of Vasoreactivity
Thoracic aortic segments were isolated and placed in 95%
O25% CO2saturated
Krebs-Ringer buffer (composition in mmol/L: NaCl 118, KCl 4.7,
CaCl2 2.5,
KH2PO4 1.2,
MgCl2 1.2, NaHCO3 12.5,
glucose 11.1, and disodium EDTA 0.01, pH 7.4). The vascular tissues
were cleaned of visible connective and fatty tissues and cut in 2- to
3-mm rings. The rings were mounted onto wire stirrups, suspended in
tissue baths filled with Krebs-Ringer buffer at 37°C, and connected
to force transducers (Grass Instruments) to record changes in
isometric force. The rings were then stretched to and maintained at a
preload of 2 g and allowed to equilibrate for 2 hours. During the
equilibration period, the buffer was changed every 30 minutes and
continuously bubbled with 95% O2 and 5%
CO2. After equilibration, some aortic rings were
exposed to cumulative concentrations of norepinephrine (NE,
10-10 to 10-5 mol/L) or
Ang II (10-10 to 10-6
mol/L) to determine the contractile response. Other aortic rings were
contracted with NE (
10-7 mol/L) to obtain 60%
to 70% of maximal contraction and then exposed to the
endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant acetylcholine (ACh,
10-10 to 10-6 mol/L). The
relaxation was expressed as percent change from preexisting (before
addition of vasorelaxant) tone.18
Immunohistochemical Localization of AT1
Receptors
Multiple 8-µm-thick transverse sections of aorta were made and
fixed in ice-cold acetone for 5 minutes. After preincubation with 0.1%
BSA, 10% normal goat serum, and 0.5% Triton X for 20 minutes followed
by a rinse with Tris-buffered saline (TBS), the sections were incubated
with a monoclonal antibody against rat AT1
receptors (a gift from Professor G.P. Vinson, London,
England)19 diluted 1:10 in TBS1% BSA (pH 7.4)
overnight at 4°C. After being rinsed with TBS, a biotin-streptavidin
detection system was used with diaminobenzidine as the chromogen, as
described elsewhere.20 In brief, slides were
washed twice with TBS and incubated with the linking reagent
(biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG) for 20 minutes at room temperature.
After being rinsed in TBS, the slides were incubated with
peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin label for 20 minutes at room
temperature. The section were again rinsed in TBS and incubated with
diaminobenzidine in the dark for 10 minutes. Mouse serum applied
instead of the primary antibody was used as a negative
control.20 In some experiments,
immunohistochemical localization of AT1 receptors
was conducted by using a rat polyclonal antibody produced by
autoimmunization of rats with the AT1 receptor
and detected by an FITC horse anti-mouse
IgG.21
AT1 Receptor mRNA Expression by RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from aortas of control and high
cholesteroldiet-fed rabbits by the guanidinium
thiocyanatephenol-chloroform method.22 The
quality of isolated RNA was checked by gel electrophoresis. For this
purpose 2 µg of total RNA was denatured in a 50% formamide and 20%
formaldehyde mixture for 10 minutes at 65°C. Denatured RNA was
fractionated by gel electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel containing
10% formaldehyde and examined under UV light after being stained with
ethidium bromide. Five micrograms of the total RNA was digested with
DNase I (RNase free) for 10 minutes at 37°C in the presence of 5 U of
RNase inhibitor. After heat inactivation of DNase, RNA was
reverse-transcribed for 50 minutes at 42°C with SuperScript II
reverse transcriptase (Gibco-BRL) with oligo(dT) as the primer
(Promega) in a 20-µL volume reaction mixture. The reaction was
stopped by heating the samples for 15 minutes at 70°C. Ten percent of
the single-stranded cDNA was used a template for amplification in the
PCR with the use of Taq polymerase (Gibco-BRL). Primers were
designed on the basis of the Ang II AT1 receptor
sequence cloned from the rabbit kidney cortex.23
The sense primer sequence was 5'-TTTGGGAACAGCTTGGCGGT-3'; reverse
primer was 5'-GCCAGCCAGCAGCCAAATAA-3'. After 5 minutes at 94°C,
amplification was performed at 94°C for 45 seconds, 55°C for 45
seconds, and 68°C for 60 seconds for 40 cycles with a final
incubation at 68°C for 7 minutes. Eight microliters of the PCR
mixture was separated on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium
bromide.
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SEM. Means of different groups
were compared by ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test for paired and
unpaired observations. A P value <0.05 was considered
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reactivity of Aortic Rings in Response to NE, Ang II, and
ACh
The contractile response of aortic rings to Ang II and NE is shown
in Figure 1
. Aortic ring contraction in
response to Ang II was markedly increased in all atherosclerotic
rabbits compared with control rabbits (P<0.01). The greater
contraction was seen in rings from all rabbits fed the
high-cholesterol diet. The contractile response of aortic
rings to NE was also greater in rings from
hypercholesterolemic rabbits than in those from
normal-cholesterol rabbits (P<0.01).
|
On exposure to the endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant
ACh, aortic rings from control rabbits exhibited a typical
concentration-dependent relaxation. In contrast, aortic rings from 4
hypercholesterolemic rabbits did not show any
relaxation, and rings from the remaining
hypercholesterolemic rabbits exhibited only modest
relaxation in response to low concentration of ACh
(10-7 mol/L) and a modest degree of contraction
in response to a higher concentration of ACh
(10-6 mol/L), a phenomenon not observed in any
of the rabbits fed regular chow. The rightward shift in the ACh
dose-response curve was highly significant (P<0.001). These
data on the relaxant reactivity of aortic rings in response to ACh are
also summarized in Figure 1
.
Ang II Receptor Expression in Aortic Tissues by
Autoradiography
Ang II receptor expression in aortic tissues was determined by
autoradiography. Total Ang II receptor expression in
the aortic tissues was several-fold higher in the
hypercholesterolemic rabbits than in the control group
(P<0.001). The increase in Ang II receptor expression was
entirely due to an increase in AT1 expression in
the hypercholesterolemic rabbits (P<0.001),
as AT2 expression in the aortic rings was similar
in the 2 groups. A representative
autoradiogram is shown in Figure 2
, and data from control and
hypercholesterolemic rabbits are summarized in Figure 3
. Although the precise localization of
increased AT1 receptor density could not be
discerned from the autoradiographs, expression appeared to be
predominantly in the media and intima.
|
|
Immunohistochemical Localization of AT1
Receptors
AT1 receptor expression was localized in
aortic tissues from hypercholesterolemic rabbits as
well as from the control group by immunohistochemical staining. With a
monoclonal antibody, AT1 receptor expression was
predominantly in the smooth muscle layers, although there was
immunopositivity in the intima as well.
AT1 receptors were present in both the
cytoplasm and cell membranes. Representative
photomicrographs showing the distribution of
immunopositivity are shown in Figure 4
. With the use of a polyclonal antibody,
expression of AT1 receptors was heavily
concentrated in the media and to a much smaller extent in the
endothelial lining (Figure 5
). Although the immunocytochemical
technique is not quantitative, the higher density of
AT1-like receptors in the
hypercholesterolemic aortas was striking.
|
|
Evidence for Increased AT1 mRNA by RT-PCR
Using AT1-specific primers, we amplified an
expected size band of 341 bp (Figure 6
).
The aortic AT1 receptor mRNA level of the
high-cholesterol group was markedly increased compared with
the control group, wherein AT1 receptor mRNA was
almost undetectable (Figure 6
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abnormally high serum cholesterol levels are thought to be an important pathogenic factor in atherosclerosis.10 There is a positive correlation between total serum cholesterol and coronary mortality rates.24 In addition, there is strong clinical evidence that lowering the total serum cholesterol level decreases the incidence of cardiac events in patients with preexisting coronary artery disease25 and others at high risk of developing coronary artery disease26 and retards progression of symptomatic atherosclerosis.27 In the current study, feeding of a high-cholesterol diet to rabbits for 10 weeks resulted in marked hypercholesterolemia and development of atherosclerosis, which is consistent with several previous reports.12 13 14 These findings confirm an important role for hypercholesterolemia in atherogenesis.
Endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), most likely NO or a closely related compound, relaxes vascular smooth muscle and inhibits oxidative modification of LDL, cell adhesion, vascular smooth muscle proliferation, and platelet aggregation.28 29 30 31 Via release of EDRF/NO and prostacyclin, the vascular endothelium plays an important role in preventing the evolution of atherosclerosis.32 Several investigators33 34 35 have documented the involvement of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. The impaired EDRF-dependent vasodilatation in hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis has been documented in both rabbit34 and human35 arteries. The current study confirms that a high-cholesterol diet results in impaired relaxation of arterial tissues in response to the endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant ACh. The decreased relaxation in response to ACh implies a decrease in NO synthesis or an increase in its degradation.
An interesting and novel observation described in this report pertains
to enhanced contraction of aortic tissues from
hypercholesterolemic rabbits in response to Ang II. The
contractile response to Ang II was enhanced in
hypercholesterolemic rabbits compared with the
controls. The increased contractile response of aortic rings
paralleled the increase in Ang II receptor expression. We found
that aortic ring contractile response to NE was also increased in
hypercholesterolemic rabbits. It is possible that the
greater contractile response to Ang II and NE is a manifestation of
attenuated NO activity in these rings. It is also possible that
hypercholesterolemia per se enhances
contractile responses to multiple agonists, such as NE and
thrombin.33 Hof et al36
have also shown an enhanced contractile response to Ang II as well as
to NE in atherosclerosis. A recent study has shown that
Ang II induces transcription and expression of
1-adrenergic receptors in vascular smooth
muscle cells.37 This mechanism may also underlie
the greater contractile response to NE in
atherosclerosis. Dusting et al,38
however, could not find any difference in vasoconstrictor response to
Ang II in control and hypercholesterolemic rabbits, but
these investigators did not report on the extent of
atherosclerosis and Ang II receptor expression. The
variable response to vasoconstrictors may relate to differences in
Ang II receptor expression and the extent of
atherosclerosis in different blood vessels. It is
possible that extensive plaque formation and distorted smooth muscle
architecture in the atherosclerotic aorta leads to altered
vasoconstriction. Notably, treatment with ACE inhibitors
has been shown to alter vasoconstriction in an experimental setting and
to decrease the facilitatory influence of Ang II on sympathetic
stimulation.39 Because it is the
AT1 receptor activation that results in
vasoconstriction in response to Ang II, we believe that the
upregulation of AT1 receptor number and affinity
for the agonist accounts for the greater contractile response to Ang II
in blood vessels from hypercholesterolemic animals
observed in the current and other studies.36
Direct evidence for increased AT1 receptor expression came from autoradiographic studies in rabbit aortas. We found that Ang II receptor expression was dramatically increased in aortic tissues from hypercholesterolemic rabbits. The increase in Ang II receptor expression was entirely due to an increase in AT1 expression, because AT2 expression was unaltered. Nickenig et al40 have recently shown that Ang II receptor gene expression is upregulated in rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells by LDL.
Ang II receptor expression has been demonstrated in the neointima of experimentally injured vessels8 and vascular smooth muscle cells of human atherosclerotic plaques.6 The critical role of tissue Ang II receptor expression and activation in the pathobiology of intimal hyperplasia is supported by the observation of prevention of neointimal hyperplasia in response to vascular injury and atherosclerosis by ACE inhibitors and AT1 receptor antagonists.10 40 41 The protective effects of the AT1 receptor antagonists SR 47436 and losartan on Ang IImediated proliferation of cultured human vascular smooth muscle cells after ischemic injury have been reported.42 43 It is noteworthy that the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in these studies was not affected by the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123,177.43 Weber et al2 showed that Ang II increased mitogenicity, intracellular calcium, phosphoinositol metabolism, and phosphorylation of a specific substrate for protein kinase C in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells and that the effect of Ang II was blocked by the AT1 receptor blocker losartan. Makita et al44 showed that AT1 receptor blockade with losartan blocked Ang IIstimulated as well as basal proliferation of human vascular smooth muscle cells. Collectively, these observations suggest that the AT1 receptor is expressed in large amounts in atherosclerotic tissues and probably participates in atherogenesis.
Ang II has cellular growthpromoting activity. In vascular smooth muscle cells, Ang II has been shown to activate fibroblast growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and transforming growth factor-ß1.6 7 The endothelium is an important factor in modulating smooth muscle function and growth, and the presence of normal endothelium has been shown to inhibit Ang IIinduced growth-promoting effects.45 46 The endothelium-produced vasodilator substances, such as prostacyclin and NO, which have growth-inhibitory actions, help maintain vascular ultrastructure. In conditions associated with diminished synthesis of NO or excessive degradation of NO, the proliferative effect of Ang II is favored, and growth of vascular smooth muscle cells may result.47 Recent studies have shown that Ang II via AT1 receptor activation enhances vascular superoxide formation via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation and contributes to the increase in vascular tone.48 Other studies have documented an inhibitory effect of AT1 receptor activation on NO synthetase mRNA and restoration of mRNA expression and NO-mediated vasorelaxation with blockade of AT1 receptors.49 50 These studies provide a conceptual basis for the relationship between increased AT1 expression and loss of NO-dependent relaxation in the presence of atherosclerosis.
The autoradiographic technique used in the current study does not permit precise localization of the Ang II receptors in the cytoplasm or the cell membrane. It is known that Ang II receptor sites are located mostly on the vascular smooth muscle cell membrane.51 Zambetis et al52 studied Ang II binding sites in rabbit arteries and found the binding sites to be dispersed throughout the media, with the highest levels of binding in the outer media as well as in the extra-adventitial inflammatory tissue of the atherosclerotic arteries. The immunohistochemical staining with a specific monoclonal antibody to AT1 receptors in our study indicated that AT1 receptor expression was predominantly in the media and to a small extent in the intima. Additional evidence from immunohistochemistry with a polyclonal antibody to AT1 receptors also indicated that the enhanced AT1 receptor expression was localized primarily in the medial layers of atherosclerotic aortas. It is possible that the immunostaining represented, at least in part, expression of AT1 receptors in macrophages, monocyte-derived smooth muscle cells, or both.
The monoclonal antibody to the AT1 receptor expression used in the current study was produced in Professor Vinson's laboratory. This antibody was produced by immunization of BALB/c mice with synthetic peptides representing sequences from the extracellular domain (residues 8 to 17) or the intracellular domain (residues 229 to 237) of the AT1 receptor. Initial characterization of the antibody showed specific immunofluorescence of vascular endothelium.19 This group subsequently demonstrated that the monoclonal antibody (6313/G2) to the AT1 receptor is specifically directed against the N-terminal extracellular domain of the mammalian AT1 receptor.53 54 This monoclonal antibody (6313/G2) to the AT1 receptor has since been used by other investigators to identify AT1 receptor expression in brain neurons.55 56 The polyclonal antibody was produced in our laboratory after immunization of rats with synthetic peptides, which represent amino acid sequence N-terminal 1423 residues of the first extracellular domain of the AT1 receptor and was anchored to the polylysine cores to form the multiple antigenic peptides. The specificity of the antibody was checked by Western blotting. A 65-kDa protein fraction was specifically selected by the antibody. This is the correct molecular weight of the mature, glycosylated AT1 receptor.21
We conducted RT-PCR to assess whether the increased
AT1 expression was due to increased
AT1 receptor mRNA. As shown in Figure 6
, we found
a marked increase in AT1 receptor mRNA in aortic
tissues of rabbits fed the high-cholesterol diet. In
contrast, there was almost no detectable AT1
receptor mRNA in aortic tissues of rabbits fed the control diet. There
is preliminary evidence that ACE levels in atherosclerotic regions of
hypercholesterolemic rabbits are significantly
reduced,52 and it is conceivable that the
reduction in tissue Ang II upregulates Ang II receptor expression.
The finding of markedly increased AT1 receptor expression in arteries from hypercholesterolemic animals is important for understanding the development and potential control of atherosclerotic plaque. A marked increase in AT1 receptor expression may be the primary basis of an Ang IImediated increase in smooth muscle cell migration, an effect enhanced by diminished NO release.57 Direct demonstration of a severalfold increase in AT1 expression in the atherosclerotic aortas of rabbits in this study should provide impetus for the use of not only chemical blockade of AT1 receptors but also of molecular biologybased techniques, such as the development of antisense oligonucleotides and antibodies to AT1 receptors, to limit atherosclerosis and preserve vascular reactivity.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received December 17, 1997; accepted March 24, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Weber H, Webb ML, Serafino R, Raylor DS, Moreland S,
Norman J, Molloy CJ. Endothelin-1 and angiotensin-II
stimulate delayed mitogenesis in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle
cells: evidence for common signaling mechanisms. Mol
Endocrinol. 1994;8:148158.
3.
Geisterfer AAT, Peach MJ, Owens GK.
Angiotensin II induces hypertrophy, not
hyperplasia, of cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Circ
Res. 1988;62:749756.
4. Pratt RE, Itoh H, Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ. Role of angiotensin in the control of vascular smooth muscle cell growth. J Vasc Med Biol. 1991;3:2529.
5. Itoh H, Mukoyama M, Pratt RE, Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ. Multiple autocrine growth factors modulate vascular smooth muscle cell response to angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:22682274.
6. Dzau VJ. Cell biology and genetics of angiotensin in cardiovascular disease. J Hypertens. 1994;12(suppl 4):S3S10.
7. Rakugi H, Kim DK, Krieger JE, Wang DS, Dzau VJ. Induction of angiotensin converting enzyme in the neointima after vascular injury: possible role in restenosis. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:339346.
8. Viswanathan M, Stromberg C, Seltzer A, Saavedra JM. Balloon angioplasty enhances the expression of angiotensin II AT1 receptors in neointima of rat aorta. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:17071712.
9. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990's. Nature. 1993;362:801809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Chobanian AV, Haudenschild CC, Nickerson C, Drago R.
Antiatherogenic effect of captopril in the Watanabe heritable
hyperlipidemic rabbit. Hypertension. 1990;15:327331.
11. Bocan TM, Mueller SB, Mazur MJ, Uhlendorf PD, Brown EQ, Kieft KA. The relationship between the degree of dietary-induced hypercholesterolemia in the rabbit and atherosclerotic lesion formation. Atherosclerosis. 1993;102:922.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Chen LY, Haught WH, Yang BC, Saldeen TGP, Parathasarathy S, Mehta JL. Preservation of endogenous antioxidant activity and inhibition of lipid peroxidation as common mechanisms of anti-atherosclerotic effect of vitamin E, lovastatin and amlodipine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:569575.[Abstract]
13.
Candipan RC, Wang BY, Buitrago R, Tsao PS, Cooke JP.
Regression or progression: dependency on vascular nitric oxide.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.. 1996;16:4450.
14. Holman Rl, McGill HC, Strong JP, Geer JC. Technics for studying atherosclerotic lesions. Lab Invest. 1958;7:425435.
15.
Yang BC, Phillips MI, Mehta P, Mehta JL. Increase in
angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression immediately
following ischemia-reperfusion in isolated rat hearts.
Circulation. 1997;96:934940.
16. Phillips MI, Wielbo D, Gyurko R. Antisense inhibition of hypertension: a new strategy for renin-angiotensin candidate genes. Kidney Int. 1994;46:15541556.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Wielbo D, Sernia C, Gyurko R, Phillips MI. Antisense
inhibition of hypertension in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Hypertension. 1995;25:314319.
18. Yang BC, Nicolini FA, Nichols WW, Mehta JL. Decreased endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation following subtotal coronary artery occlusion in dogs. Free Radic Biol Med. 1993;14:295302.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Barker S, Marchant W, Ho MM, Puddefoot JR, Hinson JP,
Clark AJ, Vinson GP. A monoclonal antibody to a conserved sequence in
the extracellular domain recognizes the angiotensin II
AT1 receptor in mammalian target tissues. J
Mol Endocrinol. 1993;11:241245.
20.
Mehta A, Yang BC, Khan S, Mehta JL. Oxidized low
density lipoprotein promotes leukocyte adhesion to vascular intima
before attenuation of endothelium-dependent relaxation.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:20762083.
21. Meng HB, Phillips MI. Autoimmunization against angiotensin type-1 receptor prevents the neointimal proliferation following angioplasty. Hypertension. 1996;28:528. Abstract.
22. Chomczynski PK, Sacchi N. Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Burns KD, Inagami T, Harris RC. Cloning of a rabbit
kidney cortex AT1 angiotensin II
receptor that is present in proximal tubule epithelium.
Am J Physiol. 1993;264:F645F654.
24.
Stamler J, Wentworth D, Neaton J. Is the relationship
between serum cholesterol and risk of death from
coronary heart disease continuous or graded? JAMA.. 1986;256:28232828.
25. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Survival Study. Lancet. 1995;345:12741275.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR,
MacFarlane PW, McKillop JH, Packard CJ, for the West of Scotland
Coronary Prevention Study Group. Prevention of coronary
heart disease with pravastatin in men with
hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J
Med. 1995;333:13011307.
27. Duffield RG, Lewis B, Miller NE. Treatment of hyperlipidemia retards progression of symptomatic femoral atherosclerosis: a randomized control trial. Lancet. 1983;2:639642.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Jessup W, Dean RT. Autoinhibition of murine macrophage-mediated oxidation of low-density lipoprotein by nitric oxide synthesis. Atherosclerosis. 1993;101:145155.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Provost P, Lam JY, Lacoste L, Merhi Y, Waters D.
Endothelium-derived nitric oxide attenuates neutrophil
adhesion to endothelium under arterial flow
conditions. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:331335.
30. Gary UC, Hassid A. Nitric oxide-generating vasodilators and 8-bromo-cyclic guanosine monophosphate inhibit mitogenesis and proliferation of cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:17741777.
31.
Mellion BT, Ignarro LJ, Ohlstein EH, Pontecorvo EG,
Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ. Evidence for the inhibitory role of
guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate in ADP-induced human platelet
aggregation in the presence of nitric oxide and related vasodilators.
Blood. 1981;57:946955.
32. Mugge A, Forstermann U, Lichtlen PR. Endothelial functions in cardiovascular diseases. Z Kardiol. 1989;78:147160.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Harrison DG. Endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Basic Res Cardiol. 1994;89:87102.
34. Jayakody L, Kappagoda T, Senaratne MPJ, Thomson ABR. Impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxation: an early marker for atherosclerosis in the rabbit. Br J Pharmacol. 1988;94:335346.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Forstermann UA, Mügge A, Acheid A, Haverich A,
Frolich JC. Selective attenuation of
endothelium-mediated vasodilation in atherosclerotic
human coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1988;62:185190.
36. Hof RP, Tapparelli C, Weinstein DB. Hemodynamic, antivasoconstrictor, and antiatherosclerotic effects of calcium antagonists in animal models of atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15:S7S12.
37.
Hu Z-W, Shi X-Y, Okazaki M, Hoffman BB.
Angiotensin II induces transcription and expression of
1-adrenergic receptors in vascular smooth
muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H1006H1014.
38. Dusting GJ, Hyland R, Hickey H, Makdissi M. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce neointimal thickening and maintain endothelial nitric oxide function in rabbit carotid arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:24E27E.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Perondi R, Saino A, Tio RA, Pomidossi G, Gregorini L,
Alessio P, Morganti A, Zanchetti A, Mancia G. ACE inhibition attenuates
sympathetic coronary vasoconstriction in patients with
coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1996;85:20042013.
40.
Nickenig G, Sachinidis A, Michaelson F, Böhm M,
Seewald S, Vetter H. Upregulation of vascular angiotensin
II receptor gene expression by low-density lipoproteins in vascular
smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 1997;95:473478.
41.
Powell JS, Clozel JP, Muller RKM, Kuhn H, Hefti F,
Hosang M, Baumgartner HR. Inhibitors of
angiotensin-converting enzyme prevent myointimal
proliferation after vascular injury. Science. 1989;245:186188.
42. Aberg G, Ferrer P. Effects of captopril on atherosclerosis in cynomolgus monkeys. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15(suppl 5):S65S72.
43. Herbert JM, Delisee C, Dol F, Schaeffer P, Cazaubon C, Nisato D, Chatelain P. Effect of SR 47436, a novel angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist, on human vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994;251:143150.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Makita S, Nakamura M, Yoshida H, Hiramori K. Effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker on angiotensin II stimulated DNA synthesis of cultured human aortic smooth muscle cells. Life Sci. 1995;56:PL383PL388.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Majesky MW, Daeman MJAP, Schwartz SM.
-1Adrenergic stimulation of
platelet-derived growth factor A-chain gene expression in rat
aorta. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:10821088.
46. Dzau MA, Gibbons GH. Endothelium and growth factors in vascular remodeling for hypertension. Hypertension. 1991;18(suppl III):III115III121.
47.
Daeman MJAP, Lombardi DM, Bosman FT, Schwartz SM.
Angiotensin II induces smooth muscle cell proliferation in
the normal and injured rat arterial wall. Circ
Res. 1991;68:450456.
48. Rajagopalan S, Kurz S, Munzel T, Tarpey M, Freeman BA, Griendling KK, Harrison DG. Angiotensin II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation: contribution to alterations of vasomotor tone. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:19161923.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Chandler LJ, Kopnisky R, Richards E, Crews FT, Sumners
C. Angiotensin decreases inducible nitric oxide synthase
expression in rat astroglial cultures. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:C700C707.
50.
Tschudi MR, Criscione L, Novosel D, Pfeffer K, Luscher
TP. Antihypertensive therapy augments
endothelium-dependent relaxations in coronary
arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation. 1994;89:22122218.
51. Feolde E, Vigne P, Frelin C. Angiotensin II receptor subtypes and biological response in the rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1993;25:13591367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Zambetis B, Dusting, GJ, Mendelsohn FA, Richardson K. Autoradiographic localization of angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II binding sites in early atheroma-like lesions in rabbit arteries. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1991;18:337340.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53.
Vinson GP, Ho MM, Puddefoot JR, Teja R, Barker S.
Internalisation of the type 1 angiotensin II receptor (AT1)
and angiotensin II function in the rat adrenal zona
glomerulosa cell. J Endocrinol. 1994;141:R5R9.
54.
Villela S, Zinna V, Marsigliante S, Ingrosso L,
Muscella A, Ho MM, Vinson GP, Storelli C. Angiotensin II
stimulation of the basolateral located
Na+/K+ antiporter in eel
(Anguilla anguilla). J Mol Endocrinol. 1996;16:5762.
55.
Yang H, Lu D, Vinson GP, Raizada MK. Involvement of the
MAP kinase in angiotensin II-induced
phosphorylation and intracellular targeting of neuronal
AT1 receptors. J Neurosci. 1997;17:16601669.
56.
Lu D, Yang H, Shaw G, Raizada MK.
Angiotensin II-induced nuclear targeting of the
angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor in
brain neurons. Endocrinology. 1998;139:365375.
57. Dubey RK, Jackson EK, Luscher TF. Nitric oxide inhibits angiotensin II-mediated migration of rat aortic smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:141149.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Cianci, A. Gigante, L. Polidori, D. Di Donato, P. Martina, B. Barbano, R. Renzulli, A. Zaccaria, and G. Fuiano In-Stent Restenosis of the Renal Artery in a Single Kidney Patient: The Role of ACEI in the Therapeutic Choice Angiology, August 1, 2009; 60(4): 496 - 503. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tavridou, L. Kaklamanis, A. Papalois, A. P. Kourounakis, E. A. Rekka, P. N. Kourounakis, A. Charalambous, and V. G. Manolopoulos EP2306 [2-(4-Biphenyl)-4-methyl-octahydro-1,4-benzoxazin-2-ol, hydrobromide], A Novel Squalene Synthase Inhibitor, Reduces Atherosclerosis in the Cholesterol-Fed Rabbit J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2007; 323(3): 794 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Mehta and K. K. Griendling Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): C82 - C97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A.J. van der Linde, E. J.G. Sijbrands, F. Boomsma, and A. H. van den Meiracker Effect of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol on Angiotensin II Sensitivity: A Randomized Trial With Fluvastatin Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1125 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maczewski, M. Borys, P. Kacprzak, T. Gdowski, and D. Wojciechowski Angiotensin II AT1 receptor density on blood platelets predicts early left ventricular remodelling in non-reperfused acute myocardial infarction in humans Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2006; 8(2): 173 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A Voors, P. P. van Geel, H. Buikema, M. Oosterga, D. J van Veldhuisen, and W. H van Gilst High Angiotensin II Responsiveness is Associated with Decreased Endothelium-Dependent Relaxation in Human Arteries Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2005; 6(3): 145 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.L. Mehta, J. Chen, F. Yu, and D.Y. Li Aspirin inhibits ox-LDL-mediated LOX-1 expression and metalloproteinase-1 in human coronary endothelial cells Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2004; 64(2): 243 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Johnstone, A. S. Perez, I. Nasser, R. Stewart, A. Vaidya, F. Al Ammary, B. Schmidt, G. Horowitz, J. Dolgoff, J. Hamilton, et al. Angiotensin Receptor Blockade With Candesartan Attenuates Atherosclerosis, Plaque Disruption, and Macrophage Accumulation Within the Plaque in a Rabbit Model Circulation, October 5, 2004; 110(14): 2060 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M Ridker, N. J. Brown, D. E. Vaughan, D. G. Harrison, and J. L. Mehta Established and Emerging Plasma Biomarkers in the Prediction of First Atherothrombotic Events Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25_suppl_1): IV-6 - IV-19. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Buhagiar, P. S. Hansen, B. Y. Kong, R. J. Clarke, C. Fernandes, and H. H. Rasmussen Dietary cholesterol alters Na+/K+ selectivity at intracellular Na+/K+ pump sites in cardiac myocytes Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): C398 - C405. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Mehta, B. Hu, J. Chen, and D. Li Pioglitazone Inhibits LOX-1 Expression in Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells by Reducing Intracellular Superoxide Radical Generation Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2003; 23(12): 2203 - 2208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Eto, S. Biro, M. Miyata, H. Kaieda, H. Obata, T. Kihara, K. Orihara, and C. Tei Angiotensin II type 1 receptor participates in extracellular matrix production in the late stage of remodeling after vascular injury Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2003; 59(1): 200 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Wyse, I. A. Prior, H. Qian, I. C. Morrow, S. Nixon, C. Muncke, T. V. Kurzchalia, W. G. Thomas, R. G. Parton, and J. F. Hancock Caveolin Interacts with the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor during Exocytic Transport but Not at the Plasma Membrane J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23738 - 23746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Singh and J. L. Mehta Interactions Between the Renin-Angiotensin System and Dyslipidemia: Relevance in the Therapy of Hypertension and Coronary Heart Disease Arch Intern Med, June 9, 2003; 163(11): 1296 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Li, V. Williams, L. Liu, H. Chen, T. Sawamura, F. Romeo, and J. L. Mehta Expression of lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptors during ischemia-reperfusion and its role in determination of apoptosis and left ventricular dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 19, 2003; 41(6): 1048 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yan, D. Kim, T. Aizawa, and B. C. Berk Functional Interplay Between Angiotensin II and Nitric Oxide: Cyclic GMP as a Key Mediator Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2003; 23(1): 26 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Li, V. Williams, L. Liu, H. Chen, T. Sawamura, T. Antakli, and J. L. Mehta LOX-1 inhibition in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: modulation of MMP-1 and inflammation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): H1795 - H1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Uehara, H. Urata, M. Ideishi, K. Arakawa, and K. Saku Chymase inhibition suppresses high-cholesterol diet-induced lipid accumulation in the hamster aorta Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2002; 55(4): 870 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Mehta and D. Li Identification, regulation and function of a novel lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2002; 39(9): 1429 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Keidar, R. Heinrich, M. Kaplan, and M. Aviram Oxidative stress increases the expression of the angiotensin-II receptor type 1 in mouse peritoneal macrophages Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2002; 3(1): 24 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Jaimes, C. Sweeney, and L. Raij Effects of the Reactive Oxygen Species Hydrogen Peroxide and Hypochlorite on Endothelial Nitric Oxide Production Hypertension, October 1, 2001; 38(4): 877 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L Mehta and Dayuan Li Facilitative interaction between angiotensin II and oxidised LDL in cultured human coronary artery endothelial cells Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S70 - S76. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Li, T. Saldeen, F. Romeo, and J. L. Mehta Oxidized LDL Upregulates Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Expression in Cultured Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells : The Potential Role of Transcription Factor NF-{kappa}B Circulation, October 17, 2000; 102(16): 1970 - 1976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Strawn, M. C. Chappell, R. H. Dean, S. Kivlighn, and C. M. Ferrario Inhibition of Early Atherogenesis by Losartan in Monkeys With Diet-Induced Hypercholesterolemia Circulation, April 4, 2000; 101(13): 1586 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schachter ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists and bradykinin Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2000; 1(1): 27 - 29. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim and H. Iwao Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Angiotensin II-Mediated Cardiovascular and Renal Diseases Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2000; 52(1): 11 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wilfert, K. Drischel, A. Unbehaun, H. Guski, P. B. Persson, and H. M. Stauss Vascular Response to Angiotensin II in Atherosclerosis : Role of the Baroreflex Hypertension, February 1, 2000; 35(2): 685 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rajagopalan, D. Duquaine, S. King, B. Pitt, and P. Patel Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism in Experimental Atherosclerosis Circulation, May 7, 2002; 105(18): 2212 - 2216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |