Brief Reviews |
From the Department of Medicine, University of WisconsinMadison.
Correspondence to Deane F. Mosher, Department of Medicine, University of WisconsinMadison, 1300 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail dfmosher{at}facstaff.wisc.edu
Key Words: fibronectin integrins cytoskeleton lysophosphatidic acid
In the past 2 decades, it has been appreciated that the functions of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are not entirely structural. ECM components interact with specific adhesion receptors on cell surfaces and regulate various cellular functions, including differentiation, proliferation, migration, and apoptosis. Fibronectin (FN) is a paradigm adhesive protein, nonreactive with adhesion receptors in its soluble state but highly adhesive when insoluble. Polymerization of FN into the ECM must be tightly regulated to ensure that the adhesive information in the ECM is appropriate.
FN exists in a soluble protomeric form in micromolar concentration in blood plasma and in an insoluble multimeric form in the ECM.1 2 Unlike fibrillar or basement membrane collagens, laminins, actin, and tubulin, circulating FN does not self-polymerize in physiologically relevant solutions. Furthermore, there is little passive accumulation of FN in preexisting ECM. Rather, assembly of FN takes place at specialized areas on the cell surface.3 FN is especially abundant in the ECM of embryonic and regenerating or injured tissues, although it can be found in most ECMs, including basement membranes. FN interacts with cells through integrins, heterodimeric transmembrane receptors linking the ECM to the intracellular cytoskeleton and signaling pathways. The aim of this review is to describe the mechanisms and consequences of FN deposition and give a brief overview of the significance of FN for selected areas of cardiovascular research. In the first section we describe important features of the FN molecule that account for its multiple functions. Next, we focus on the assembly process, ie, the conversion of soluble FN to its active, adhesive, insoluble form. Finally, we discuss several areas of cardiovascular research in which FN may have an important role, exemplifying how the adhesive information of FN can drive pathophysiological processes.
Structure of FN
Soluble FN is a dimeric glycoprotein. Each subunit is
a mosaic of a series of repeating modules: 12 type I modules, 2 type
II, 15 to 17 (depending on splicing) type III, and a variable (V)
sequence that is not homologous to other parts of FN (Figure 1
). The deduced amino acid sequences for
FNs of the clawed frog and rat are well conserved, possessing 71%
amino acid identity and the same overall
organization.4 The 2 type III modules that are
subject to alternative splicing are called ED-A (ED for
"extradomain") and ED-B. Plasma FN is synthesized in the liver by
hepatocytes and contains neither ED-A nor ED-B, whereas
so-called "cellular" FN (synthesized locally in tissues) contains
variable amounts of either or both ED-A and
ED-B.1 2 Furthermore, in plasma FN dimers, only 1
of the subunits contains the V region, whereas almost all cellular FN
subunits contain this region.5
|
FN binds to
5ß1 and
IIbß3 integrins
through a cell adhesive site comprising modules III8-III10. The most
critical site is the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence in III10. RGD peptides
block integrin-mediated cell adhesion to FN.1 2
RGD sequences occur in other molecules that mediate adhesion to
integrin receptors as well.1 2 The sequence in FN
is synergized by modules III8-III9. The Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn sequence in
III9 is of special importance.6 7 The crystal
structure of the seventh to 10th type III repeats (III7-III10) reveals
an extended rodlike molecule with a long axis of
140Å and a
somewhat variable relationship between adjacent modules. The
relationship between III9 and III10 creates a distinctive binding site,
in which the RGD loop in III10 and the synergy region from III9 are on
the same face of III7-10 and thus, easily accessible to the
integrin.8
The FN molecule also has many other adhesive sites for various
substances, including fibrin, heparin, collagen, and
4ß1 and
4ß7 integrins (Figure 1
). A Gln residue close to the amino terminus serves as a
transglutamination site for activated factor XIII (fXIIIa;
plasma transglutaminase), cross-linking FN to various other proteins,
including fibrin, fibrinogen, and itself. Cross-linking by fXIIIa is
important for incorporation of FN into fibrin clots during the clotting
process.1 2
4ß1 and
4ß7 integrins
recognize a Leu-Asp-Val sequence in the V region of
FN.9
Given the developmental and tissue-specific patterns of splicing, it
seems very likely that different splice variants have specific cellular
effects. Studies on chondrogenesis have shown the ED-A domain to be
essential at the level of cellular
condensation.10 In an experimental rat hepatic
fibrosis model, there was marked increase in ED-Apositive FN
expressed in sinusoidal endothelial cells, and the
matrixes deposited by these cells stimulate the conversion of liver
lipocytes to myofibroblasts.11 This stimulation
was blocked by antibodies specific to the ED-A domain, whereas
recombinant FN peptides containing the ED-A domain mimicked the effect.
Fibrosarcoma cells have increased adhesion and spreading on
recombinantly expressed ED-Acontaining FN compared with
ED-Anegative FN.12 Unlike the effects on liver
lipocytes, this effect could not be blocked by antiED-A antibodies
but was blocked by RGD-containing peptides or antibodies against
5 and ß1 integrin
subunits. Furthermore, purified
5ß1 bound more avidly
to ED-Acontaining FN than ED-Anegative FN, suggesting that the
effect of the ED-A exon splicing is to improve binding affinity to
integrin.
FN Matrix Assembly
FN matrix assembly is a cell-mediated process that occurs in a
stepwise manner. Initially, soluble protomeric FN binds to the cell
surface via an interaction mediated primarily by the
N-terminal 70-kDa region of the protein. This first step is
saturable and reversible.13 In the next step,
cell-bound protomeric FN is converted into disulfide-stabilized
multimers by interaction among or between FN
molecules.14 15 In a presumptive final step, the
binding site on the cell surface is regenerated. Assembly takes place
at specialized sites on cell surfaces and requires the participation of
both integrins and cell surface sites referred to as LAMMs (molecules
of large apparent molecular mass; see below).3
Fibroblasts, endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle
cells, and other cell types secrete, bind, and assemble FN into fibrils
in the ECM.16 Plasma FN and cellular FN
synthesized locally both have the potential to be deposited into the
ECM.17 Figure 2
schematizes our current understanding of cellular regulation of the
assembly process. In this section, we will highlight the important
sites in the FN molecule, as well as the cell surface and intracellular
regulatory components, involved in FN assembly.
|
Regions of FN Important for Matrix Assembly
There are several regions within FN that have vital importance in
the assembly process (Figure 1
). Deletion of the 20 amino acids from
the carboxyl terminus yields monomeric FN owing to lack of the Cys
residues involved in interchain disulfide bridges. This monomeric FN
does not become incorporated into the matrix.18
Most of the binding activity that directs FN to assembly sites is
contained in the amino-terminal 70-kDa region (70-kDa fragment), in
particular, within modules I1-I5. Although proteolytic fragments or
recombinant proteins containing these modules do not assemble into
fibrils, these proteins bind to assembly sites with the same avidity as
intact FN and block the binding and assembly of intact
FN.19 20 21 Use of the 70-kDa fragment has proved
valuable in studying the regulation and characteristics of the cell
surface assembly sites. Removal of any of the modules I1-I5 results in
a protein with markedly decreased affinity for assembly
sites,20 and similarly, mutations of conserved
Tyr residues in any of the modules cause decreased affinity. It is
likely that the 5 type I modules work as a single functional unit in
binding to the cell surface. Two other regions, the presumptive
self-interacting site I9/III119 and the cell
adhesion site III8-10, also appear to be important in the assembly
process, although controversy still remains about their exact role. The
III1 module has been shown under denatured condition to bind the 70-kDa
fragment.22 Furthermore, the cell adhesive III10
module has been shown to bind III1 in an RGD-independent
manner.23 By
immunofluorescence, the 70-kDa fragment colocalizes
with III1 and III10 modules when added to fibroblasts under serum-free
conditions. These results raise the possibility that the matrix
assembly site, ie, the 70-kDa-fragment binding site, is cryptic within
module III1, and binding of this module to III10 might expose the
70-kDa binding site, thus allowing assembly to occur. Against this
hypothesis are the inability to cross-link the 70-kDa fragment to
preexisting FN with fXIIIa under conditions favoring the binding of
70-kDa fragment to the cell surface (see below) and the lack of good
colocalization of the 70-kDa fragment with preexisting
FN.24
Role of Integrins
Among the membrane components involved in FN polymerization,
integrins have been shown to play an important role. Integrins are
heterodimeric transmembrane receptors that mediate organization of
focal contacts, actin-containing cytoskeleton, and ECM. Transfection of
5 integrin and expression of
5ß1 integrin in
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells result in a large increase in FN
assembly.25 26 A chimera comprising the
interleukin-2 receptor and the cytoplasmic tail of
ß1 functions in a presumptive dominant-negative
manner to inhibit assembly.27 Monoclonal
antibodies to
5 or ß1
inhibit binding and assembly of FN by fibroblasts and also binding of
the N-terminal FN fragment to cell
surfaces.28 29 The 70-kDa fragment of FN that
mediates binding to assembly sites colocalizes with
ß1 integrin in focal
contacts.30 However, cell surface
5ß1 integrin could not
be demonstrated to bind to the N-terminal 70-kDa fragment by
affinity chromatography.29
Furthermore, studies of
5 knockout mice and
cells derived from these mice and also of ß1
knockout cells31 32 indicate that other molecules
can substitute for
5ß1
in matrix assembly.
Expression of activated forms of
IIbß333 34
and
vß335
allows CHO cells to assemble an FN matrix. Overexpression of
v, which can pair with
ß1 or
ß3,36 or
4, which pairs with
ß1,37 does not confer
assembly competency to CHO cells. Transfection of
3 causing overexpression of
3ß1, an adhesion
receptor for entactin, allows assembly of FN if CHO cells are cultured
on an entactin-coated substrate; such assembly is not blocked by
antibodies to the cell adhesion domain of FN.38
Cells with blocked protein synthesis30 or those
lacking ß1 integrins39
are unable to assemble FN when cultured on vitronectin.
Thus, expression of several different integrins allows adherent cells
to be assembly-competent, and the specific integrins required seem
dependent on the substrate to which assembling cells are adherent.
Ligated integrins probably signal, at least in part, through activation
of Rho-dependent pathways40 41 that appear to
play an important role in the assembly process (see below).
Role of Actin Stress-Fiber Formation, Cell Contraction, and
LAMMs
Serum and lipoproteins stimulate FN matrix assembly by MG63
osteosarcoma cells and normal fibroblasts.42 43
More recently, the phospholipid growth factor lysophosphatidic acid
(LPA), abundant in serum and lipoproteins, has been shown to mediate
this effect.44 LPA is a product of
activated platelets and has diverse actions on cells
mediated by activation of several signal transduction
pathways.45 The enhanced binding is due to
increases in both the number and affinity of cell surface binding
sites. The increase in binding sites induced by LPA is labile; the
sites rapidly disappear when LPA is removed and reappear when LPA is
added again. The binding also correlates with changes in cell shape and
actin-containing cytoskeleton.44 On scanning
electron photomicrographs, the binding sites for FN on LPA-stimulated
cells occur on areas of the cell membrane containing numerous cell
protrusions that extend between cells or between cells and the
substratum.44
Disruption of microtubules has been shown to mimic some of the intracellular effects of LPA, including the formation of actin stress fibers and myosin light-chain phosphorylation.46 47 Disruption of microtubules by nocodazole or vinblastine increases both the number and affinity of binding sites on cells, and the modulation is rapid, dynamic, and reversible.48 These effects are identical to the effects of LPA on FN binding. Another agent that mimics the cytoskeletal effects of LPA is the sphingolipid sphingosine-1-phosphate. This agent also causes rapid upregulation of FN binding sites (Q. Zhang et al, unpublished data, 1997).
Fluorescence microscopy has revealed a close correlation among actin stress-fiber formation, cell contraction, and FN binding in all of the stimulatory agents tested,44 48 indicating that upregulation of the matrix assembly sites is secondary to actin stress-fiber formation and cell contraction. At nanomolar concentrations, LPA stimulates rapid formation of actin stress fibers mediated by activation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho in fibroblasts.49 The enhanced binding of soluble FN and the 70-kDa fragment is seen with similar doses of LPA. Rho-mediated actin stress-fiber formation is dependent on activation of the actin-myosin contractile apparatus.50 Blockage of the small GTP-binding protein Rho, myosin light-chain kinase, or actin-myosin interactions inhibits the effects of both nocodazole and LPA on FN binding.48 These observations demonstrate that Rho-dependent actin stress-fiber formation and cell contraction induce increased FN binding and represent a rapid, labile way that cells can modulate FN matrix assembly.
Two different cross-linking strategies have been used to identify the cell surface molecules on adherent cells that bind FN or its 70-kDa fragment as LAMMs on SDSpolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.24 No evidence was found for cross-linking to integrins or, surprisingly, endogenous FN. Cross-linking to LAMMs is subject to tight modulation, as befits the labile nature of the assembly site. Treatment with LPA or microtubule disruption induces tension on the adherent cells and may stretch labile assembly sites, leading to exposure of multiple, cryptic binding sites for the N-terminal modules of FN.
Cellular display of FN matrix assembly sites, in conclusion, is labile
and correlates with cell shape change and cytoskeleton organization as
illustrated in Figure 2
. Integrins play important roles in FN
deposition by sensing information from the ECM and influencing
cytoskeletal organization and cell shape and perhaps also by
concentrating assembling FN molecules.51 Cell
surface LAMMs are present at the labile assembly sites for FN.
Cellular display of assembly sites requires that cells be under tension
and is tightly regulated. Another way of achieving insolubilization is
cross-linking of soluble FN to already-formed matrix, best exemplified
in the blood clotting process. This process is discussed in the next
section.
FN and the Cardiovascular System
FN and Blood Clotting
The conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin and formation of the fibrin
clot are the culminating events in the blood clotting process and are
under tight control, just like the insolubilization of FN. The pathway
of blood clotting is very different from the pathways described above
for FN, the most obvious differences being the lack of proteolytic
processing of FN. Interestingly, though, blood clotting is initiated by
a cell surface protein, tissue factor, and the cross-linking by fXIIIa
is common to the 2 pathways.
After tissue injury, formation of a blood clot serves the dual role of
restoring vascular integrity and serving as a temporary scaffold for
the wound healing process. It has long been known that improper wound
healing occurs in fXIII-deficient patients52 and
that fibroblast growth is impaired in clots formed from fXIII-deficient
plasma.53 fXIIIa covalently cross-links fibrin
molecules to greatly increase the structural stability. Furthermore,
fXIIIa catalyzes cross-linking of soluble FN to the fibrin
clot.54 55 Cross-linking occurs through the
formation of covalent bonds between Gln residues in the
N-terminal region of FN and the
-amino group of a Lys
residue in the
-chain of fibrin.56 57 The
covalently cross-linked FN further enhances the stability of the
clot.58 Plasma FN is preferred over cellular FN
in this cross-linking process, apparently because of the asymmetric
distribution of the V region in only 1 of the 2 subunits of the plasma
FN dimer.59 The cross-linking of FN to the fibrin
clot promotes fibroblast adhesion and
spreading,60 61 such that cross-linked FN is an
absolute requirement for migration of fibroblasts into plasma clots
formed in vivo.62 When FN with engineered
mutations of the Gln residues involved in cross-linking is used in in
vitro clot formation, adhesion and spreading of fibroblasts are
markedly reduced.63 Thus, cross-linking of
soluble FN to fibrin must expose the adhesive domains for cellular
interactions in a way that attracts the fibroblasts into the clot.
Fibroblasts in the healing wound acquire a phenotype called the
myofibroblast, important for wound contraction.60
It is these tension-generating cells that assemble
FN.64 The wound healing process is thus initiated
by the proteolytic blood clotting process, which, owing to the
cross-linking of FN to the clot, enables the migration of the cellular
elements of wound healing to the area. The cells acquire a
phenotype suitable for further assembly of FN matrix, which
finally is replaced by collagen as the wound heals. FN can also be
cross-linked to collagen, a reaction that is potentially important for
collagen fibrillogenesis.65 A schematic model of
the sequential matrix deposition in wound healing is depicted in Figure 3
. This model of matrix deposition seems
to hold true in a variety of tissue injuries. The first step, ie,
fibrin deposition, is dependent on activation of the blood clotting
system and is seen only when vascular integrity is altered. FN
deposition (late provisional matrix) can be seen in a wide variety of
tissue reparative processes and portends more permanent collagen
deposition. Examples of this are discussed below with regard to
vascular and myocardial processes. It is likely that the adhesive
information within the insoluble FN is more important than its
structural role. The ability of FN to attract fibroblasts into the
wound healing area and alter their gene expression and
phenotype seems central to its importance in this process.
|
FN as a ligand for platelet integrins may also be involved in
platelet adhesion and aggregation. FN binds to the platelet
integrins
IIbß3 in an
activation-dependent manner66 and to
5ß1 in an
activation-independent fashion.67 Under shear
stress in an ex vivo system, platelets deposit with similar
efficiencies to surfaces coated with FN, fibrinogen, or von
Willebrand factor (vWF).68 Although
adhesion to FN depends on binding to
5ß1 and
IIbß3 in an
RGD-sensitive manner, under shear stress, adhesion to FN is also
dependent on glycoprotein Ib adhesion via
vWF.69 Platelet aggregation can proceed
normally in FN-depleted plasma, but because the platelets
themselves contain FN in the
-granules, it is difficult to exclude a
role for FN in this process. Furthermore, a monoclonal antibody against
platelet FN inhibits platelet aggregation while having no
effect on serotonin release.70 Thus,
although fibrinogen and vWF are the major ligands for platelet
adhesion and aggregation, it is likely that FN plays more than a cameo
role.
FN and Atherosclerosis
The highly organized histological architecture of
the vascular wall and the specialized cellular phenotypes are
perturbed in conditions like atherosclerosis,
restenosis, and hypertension. In
atherosclerosis, the change in phenotype of the
endothelium is postulated to play a key role in
initiation and progression of the atherosclerotic
lesion.71 In the more advanced lesion, the
location and phenotype of the vascular smooth cell are markedly
altered. Smooth muscle cells acquire a proliferative, synthetic
phenotype and migrate into the subendothelial
lesion. The proliferative phenotype is characterized by a
change in protein expression, increase in response to growth factors,
and formation of extensive rough endoplasmic reticulum and a large
Golgi complex.71 Increased expression of FN may
contribute to the transformation of vascular smooth muscle cells in
intimal thickening of atherosclerotic lesions, from the contractile
phenotype to a synthesizing or proliferative phenotype.
One of the striking differences that occurs in the vascular wall is a
change in the composition of the ECM. Under normal conditions, the main
components of the matrix proteins are basement membrane proteins,
collagen type IV, and laminin. Significant amounts of FN are also
found, but such FN is strictly devoid of the ED-A and ED-B domains. In
atherosclerotic lesions, there is a marked increase in FN that
colocalizes with collagen type III, which is also
upregulated.72 This pattern suggests a tissue
repairtype process analogous to that which can be observed during
wound healing. When studied in vitro, vascular smooth cells can be
induced to switch back and forth between the 2 phenotypes,
depending on the matrix on which the cells are grown. The basement
membrane components laminin and collagen type IV promote the
contractile phenotype, whereas FN promotes the synthetic
phenotype.73 After experimental
endothelial denudation, there is rapid (24 to 48 hours)
upregulation in the expression of FN mRNA, including both ED-A and
ED-Bpositive isoforms.74 This expression is
sustained even after reendothelialization is achieved.
Similarly, after vascular injury, immunoelectron microscopy studies in
vivo show a close association between deposition of FN and the
synthetic phenotype, whereas laminin and other basement
membrane components are associated with a contractile
phenotype.75
Based on data with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists76 and infusion of angiotensin II,77 it has been postulated that angiotensin II plays an important role in the neointimal thickening after vascular injury. Furthermore, blocking the angiotensin II receptor significantly inhibits mRNA expression of immediate-early genes (c-fos, c-jun, and Egr-1) and FN as well as inhibiting FN protein deposition after arterial injury.78 Inhibition of expression is associated with a decrease in the overall intimal thickening. Taken together, these data indicate that FN expression is closely associated with the development of atherosclerosis and that the isoform expression includes the ED-A and ED-B forms not normally seen in the adult vessel wall. Although it is not definite whether the ED-A or ED-B splice variant plays a specific role in promoting the changes seen in vascular smooth cells, given the developmental and tissue-specific patterns of splicing, it seems very likely that these different splice variants have specific cellular effects, as discussed above.
FN and Hypertension
Vascular smooth muscle cells in hypertensive subjects exhibit a
phenotype similar to that seen in the
atheromatous lesion.79 This
proliferative phenotype is closely associated with a marked
upregulation in ED-Apositive FN.79 80
Furthermore, hypertension in different rat animal models has been shown
to rapidly increase ED-Apositive FN expression (3- to 6-fold),
correlating with the degree of blood pressure elevation; this
expression is reversed by normalization of the blood
pressure.81 82 83 Similar to FN expression in
atherosclerosis, angiotensin II rapidly
increases FN expression in the aortic wall after a 3-day infusion, an
effect that is inhibited by angiotensin II receptor
blockade and occurs independently of the increase in blood
pressure.84
The end-organ damage seen in the heart in hypertension is characterized by a marked increase in FN expression. The left ventricular hypertrophy characteristically seen in hypertension is associated with an abnormal accumulation of fibrillar collagen. This deposition is thought to account for the myocardial stiffness central to the myocardial dysfunction in hypertensive heart disease.85 The cardiac interstitial fibroblasts and/or pericytes acquire a myofibroblast phenotype similar to that described for wound repair.85 Before the deposition of collagen in the hypertensive myocardium, there is an increase in FN mRNA expression86 and FN deposition.87 This FN is predominantly ED-A and ED-Bpositive.88 A role for angiotensin II in inducing the gene expression necessary for tissue repair is postulated to be central and might explain the multiple beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on cardiac remodeling and hypertrophy.85 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors inhibited the accumulation of FN in the hypertensive myocardium, even at a low dosage that did not alter blood pressure.89
FN and Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial infarction is a prime example of the importance of the
wound healing process. The formation of the scar and the remodeling of
the myocardial wall are major determinants of patient outcome. As
expected, FN is rapidly expressed after myocardial infarction in both
humans90 and animal
models.91 92 This increase in FN involves both
ED-A and ED-Bpositive and negative FN and occurs with or without
reperfusion,91 although there are trends toward
increased FN expression after delayed
reperfusion.93
Future Directions
The understanding of the interactions between cells and the ECM
has suggested strategies to intervene in disease pathogenesis. Although
much of the impetus to disrupt interactions between the ECM and
integrins has focused on the design of antitumor
therapies,94 it has been in the field of
cardiovascular diseases that the strategy first reached
fruition. Humanized mouse monoclonal antibody against
IIbß3 efficiently
blocks fibrinogen-dependent platelet aggregation and is beneficial
in preventing acute thrombosis after
angioplasty.95 Given the complexity of control of
both FN deposition and the cellular consequences of adhesion to FN,
additional strategies that target FN deposition pathways specifically
may yield additional beneficial effects.
Many questions are unanswered regarding the role of increased FN deposition in various cardiovascular disease processes. The role of the various splice variants of FN, eg, in mediating the phenotypic transformation of vascular smooth cells, needs elucidation. The effects of angiotensin and its inhibitors on deposition of FN by smooth muscle cells and cardiac fibroblasts need to be assessed. Finally, more needs to be learned about the impact of lipid mediators such as LPA on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases.
Acknowledgments
The experimental work described here was supported by NIH grant HL21644 (to D.F.M.). We thank Dr Qinghong Zhang for many valuable discussions.
Received March 31, 1998; accepted May 8, 1998.
References
1. Mosher DF. Fibronectin. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1989.
2. Hynes RO. Fibronectins. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag Inc; 1990.
3.
Peters DM, Mosher DF. Localization of cell surface
sites involved in fibronectin fibrillogenesis. J Cell
Biol. 1987;104:121130.
4. DeSimone DW. Adhesion and matrix in vertebrate development. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994;6:747751.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Schwarzbauer JE, Spencer CS, Wilson CL. Selective
secretion of alternatively spliced fibronectin variants. J
Cell Biol. 1989;109:34453453.
6.
Aota S, Nomizu M, Yamada KM. The short amino acid
sequence Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn in human fibronectin enhances
cell-adhesive function. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:2475624761.
7.
Bowditch RD, Hariharan M, Tominna EF, Smith JW, Yamada
KM, Getzoff ED, Ginsberg MH. Identification of a novel integrin binding
site in fibronectin: differential utilization by ß3 integrins.
J Biol Chem. 1994;269:1085610863.
8. Leahy DJ, Aukhil I, Erickson HP. 2.0 Å crystal structure of a four-domain segment of human fibronectin encompassing the RGD loop and synergy region. Cell. 1996;84:155164.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Lobb RR, Hemler ME. The pathophysiologic role of
4 integrins in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:17221728.
10. Gehris AL, Stringa E, Spina J, Desmond ME, Tuan RS, Bennett VD. The region encoded by the alternatively spliced exon IIIA in mesenchymal fibronectin appears essential for chondrogenesis at the level of cellular condensation. Dev Biol. 1997;190:191205.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Jarnagin WR, Rockey DC, Koteliansky VE, Wang SS,
Bissell DM. Expression of variant fibronectins in wound healing:
cellular source and biological activity of the EIIIA segment in rat
hepatic fibrogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1994;127:20372048.
12.
Manabe R, Ohe N, Maeda T, Fukuda T, Sekiguchi K.
Modulation of cell-adhesive activity of fibronectin by the
alternatively spliced EDA segment. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:295307.
13.
McKeown-Longo PJ, Mosher DF. Binding of plasma
fibronectin to cell layers of human skin fibroblasts. J Cell
Biol. 1983;97:466472.
14.
McKeown-Longo PJ, Mosher DF. Mechanism of formation of
disulfide-bonded multimers of plasma fibronectin in cell layers
of cultured human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:1221012215.
15.
Chen H, Mosher DF. Formation of sodium dodecyl
sulfate-stable fibronectin multimers: failure to detect
products of thiol-disulfide exchange in cyanogen bromide or limited
acid digests of stabilized matrix fibronectin. J Biol
Chem. 1996;271:90849089.
16. Colvin RB. Fibronectin in wound healing. In: Mosher DF, ed. Fibronectin. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1989:213254.
17. Allio AE, McKeown-Longo PJ. Extracellular matrix assembly of cell-derived and plasma-derived fibronectins by substrate-attached fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 1988;135:459466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Schwarzbauer JE. Identification of the fibronectin
sequences required for assembly of a fibrillar matrix. J
Cell Biol. 1991;113:14631473.
19.
Chernousov MA, Fogerty FJ, Koteliansky VE, Mosher DF.
Role of the I-9 and III-1 modules of fibronectin in formation of an
extracellular fibronectin matrix. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:1085110858.
20.
Sottile J, Schwarzbauer J, Selegue J, Mosher DF. Five
type I modules of fibronectin form a functional unit that binds to
fibroblasts and Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol
Chem. 1991;266:1284012843.
21. McKeown-Longo PJ, Mosher DF. The assembly of the fibronectin matrix in cultured human fibroblast cells. In: Mosher DF. ed. Fibronectin. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1989:163179.
22.
Hocking DC, Sottile J, McKeown-Longo PJ. Fibronectin's
III-1 module contains a conformation-dependent binding site for the
amino-terminal region of fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:1918319191.
23.
Hocking DC, Smith RK, McKeown-Longo PJ. A novel role
for the integrin-binding III-10 module in fibronectin matrix assembly.
J Cell Biol. 1996;133:431444.
24.
Zhang Q, Mosher DF. Cross-linking of the
NH2-terminal region of fibronectin to molecules
of large apparent molecular mass (LAMMs): characterization of
fibronectin assembly sites induced by the treatment of fibroblasts with
lysophosphatidic acid. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:3328433292.
25.
Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. Elevated levels of the
5ß1 fibronectin receptor suppresses the transformed
phenotype of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cell. 1990;60:849859.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Wu C, Bauer JS, Juliano RL, McDonald JA. The
5ß1 integrin
fibronectin receptor, but not the
5
cytoplasmic domain, functions in an early and essential step in
fibronectin matrix assembly. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:2188321888.
27.
LaFlamme SE, Thomas LA, Yamada SS, Yamada KM.
Single subunit chimeric integrins as mimics and inhibitors
of endogenous integrin functions in receptor localization,
cell spreading and migration, and matrix assembly. J Cell
Biol. 1994;126:12871298.
28.
Akiyama SK, Yamada SS, Chen W-T, Yamada KM.
Analysis of fibronectin receptor function with monoclonal
antibodies: roles in cell adhesion, migration, matrix assembly, and
cytoskeletal organization. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:863875.
29.
Fogerty FJ, Akiyama SK, Yamada KM, Mosher DF.
Inhibition of binding of fibronectin to matrix assembly sites by
anti-integrin (
5ß1) antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1990;111:699708.
30.
Dzamba BJ, Bultmann H, Akiyama SK, Peters DM.
Substrate-specific binding of the amino terminus of fibronectin to an
integrin complex in focal adhesions. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:1964619652.
31.
Yang JT, Rayburn H, Hynes RO. Embryonic mesodermal
defects in
5 integrin-deficient mice.
Development. 1993;119:10931105.[Abstract]
32.
Wennerberg K, Lohikangas L, Gullberg D, Pfaff M,
Johansson S, Fässler R. ß1 Integrin-dependent and
-independent polymerization of fibronectin. J Cell
Biol. 1996;132:227238.
33. Wu C, Keivens VM, O'Toole TE, McDonald JA, Ginsberg MH. Integrin activation and cytoskeletal interaction are essential for the assembly of a fibronectin matrix. Cell. 1995;83:715724.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Hughes PE, Diaz-Gonzalez F, Leong L, Wu C, McDonald JA,
Shattil SJ, Ginsberg MH. Breaking the integrin hinge: a defined
structural constraint regulates integrin signaling. J Biol
Chem. 1996;271:65716574.
35. Wu C, Hughes PE, Ginsberg MH, McDonald JA. Identification of a new biological function for the integrin alpha v beta 3: initiation of fibronectin matrix assembly. Cell Adhes Commun. 1996;4:149158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Zhang Z, Morla AO, Vuori K, Bauer JS, Juliano RL,
Ruoslahti E. The
vß1 integrin functions as a fibronectin
receptor but does not support fibronectin matrix assembly and cell
migration on fibronectin. J Cell Biol. 1993;122:235242.
37.
Wu C, Fields AJ, Kapteijn BAE, McDonald JA. The role of
4ß1 integrin in cell
motility and fibronectin matrix assembly. J Cell Sci. 1995;108:821829.[Abstract]
38.
Wu C, Chung AE, McDonald JA. A novel role for
3ß1 integrins in extracellular matrix assembly. J
Cell Sci. 1995;108:25112523.[Abstract]
39.
Sakai T, Zhang Q, Fässler R, Mosher DF.
Modulation of ß1A integrin functions by tyrosine residues in the
ß1 cytoplasmic domain. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:527538.
40. Chong LD, Traynor-Kaplan A, Bokoch GM, Schwartz MA. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates a phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase in mammalian cells. Cell. 1994;79:507513.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Nobes CD, Hall A. Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell. 1995;81:5362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Rennard SI, Wind ML, Hewitt AT, Kleinman HK. Effect of collagen and cell shape on binding of fibronectin to cells. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1981;206:205212.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Checovich WJ, Schultz RL, Mosher DF. Lipoproteins enhance fibronectin binding to adherent cells. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:11221130.[Abstract]
44.
Zhang Q, Checovich WJ, Peters DM, Albrecht RM, Mosher
DF. Modulation of cell surface fibronectin assembly sites by
lysophosphatidic acid. J Cell Biol. 1994;127:14471459.
45. Moolenaar WH, Kranenburg O, Postma FR, Zondag GCM. Lysophosphatidic acid: G-protein signalling and cellular responses. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:168173.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Bershadsky A, Chausovsky A, Becker E, Lyubimova AX, Geiger B. Involvement of microtubules in the control of adhesion-dependent signal transduction. Curr Biol. 1996;6:12791289.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Kolodney MS, Elson EL. Contraction due to microtubule
disruption is associated with increased phosphorylation
of myosin regulatory light chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1995;92:1025210256.
48. Zhang Q, Magnusson MK, Mosher DF. Lysophosphatidic acid and microtubule destabilizing agents stimulate fibronectin matrix assembly through Rho-dependent actin stress fiber formation and cell contraction. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8:14151425.[Abstract]
49. Ridley AJ, Hall A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell. 1992;70:389399.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50.
Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K. Rho-stimulated
contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and
focal adhesions. J Cell Biol. 1996;133:14031415.
51.
Sechler JL, Corbett SA, Schwarzbauer JE. Modulatory
roles for integrin activation and the synergy site of fibronectin
during matrix assembly. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8:25632573.
52. Alami SY, Hampton JW, Race GJ, Speer RJ. Fibrin stabilizing factor. Am J Med. 1968;44:17.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Beck E, Duckert F, Ernst M. The influence of fibrin stabilizing factor on the growth of fibroblasts in vitro and wound healing. Thromb Diathes Haemorr. 1961;6:485491.
54.
Mosher DF. Cross-linking of cold-insoluble globulin by
fibrin-stabilizing factor. J Biol Chem. 1975;250:66146621.
55.
Mosher DF. Action of fibrin-stabilizing factor on
cold-insoluble globulin and alpha2-macroglobulin in clotting plasma.
J Biol Chem. 1976;251:16391645.
56. Greenberg CS, Birckbichler PJ, Rice RH. Transglutaminases: multifunctional cross-linking enzymes that stabilize tissues. FASEB J. 1991;5:30713077.[Abstract]
57. Aeschlimann D, Paulsson M. Transglutaminases: protein cross-linking enzymes in tissues and body fluids. Thromb Haemost. 1994;71:402415.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Kamykowski GW, Mosher DF, Lorand L, Ferry JD. Modification of shear modulus and creep compliance of fibrin clots by fibronectin. Biophys Chem. 1981;13:2528.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59.
Wilson CL, Schwarzbauer JE. The alternatively spliced V
region contributes to the differential incorporation of plasma and
cellular fibronectins into fibrin clots. J Cell Biol. 1992;119:923933.
60. Grinnell F, Feld M, Minter D. Fibroblast adhesion to fibrinogen and fibrin substrata: requirement for cold-insoluble globulin (plasma fibronectin). Cell. 1980;19:517525.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61.
Corbett SA, Wilson CL, Schwarzbauer JE. Changes in cell
spreading and cytoskeletal organization are induced by adhesion to a
fibronectin-fibrin matrix. Blood. 1996;88:158166.
62.
Knox P, Crooks S, Rimmer CS. Role of fibronectin in the
migration of fibroblasts into plasma clots. J Cell
Biol. 1986;102:23182323.
63.
Corbett SA, Lee L, Wilson CL, Schwarzbauer JE. Covalent
cross-linking of fibronectin to fibrin is required for maximal cell
adhesion to a fibronectin-fibrin matrix. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:2499925005.
64. Halliday NL, Tomasek JJ. Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix influence fibronectin fibril assembly in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1995;217:109117.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Mosher DF, Schad PE, Kleinman HK. Cross-linking of fibronectin to collagen by blood coagulation factor XIIIa. J Clin Invest. 1979;64:781787.
66. Gardner JM, Hynes RO. Interaction of fibronectin with its receptor on platelets. Cell. 1985;42:439448.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
67.
Piotrowicz RS, Orchekowski RP, Nugent DJ, Yamada KY,
Kunicki TJ. Glycoprotein Ic-IIa functions as an
activation-independent fibronectin receptor on human platelets.
J Cell Biol. 1988;106:13591364.
68. Lambrecht LK, Young BR, Stafford RE, Park K, Albrecht RM, Mosher DF, Cooper SL. The influence of preadsorbed canine von Willebrand factor, fibronectin and fibrinogen on ex vivo artificial surface-induced thrombosis. Thromb Res. 1986;41:99117.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
69.
Beumer S, Heijnen HF, IJsseldijk MJ, Orlando E, de
Groot PG, Sixma JJ. Platelet adhesion to fibronectin in flow: the
importance of von Willebrand factor and
glycoprotein Ib. Blood. 1995;86:34523460.
70.
Dixit VM, Haverstick DM, O'Rourke K, Hennessy SW,
Broekelmann TJ, McDonald JA, Grant GA, Santoro SA, Frazier WA.
Inhibition of platelet aggregation by a monoclonal antibody against
human fibronectin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:38443848.
71. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
72. Labat-Robert J, Szendroi M, Godeau G, Robert L. Comparative distribution patterns of type I and III collagens and fibronectin in human arteriosclerotic aorta. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985;33:261265.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
73. Thyberg J, Hultgardh-Nilsson A. Fibronectin and the basement membrane components laminin and collagen type IV influence the phenotypic properties of subcultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells differently. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;276:263271.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74.
Bauters C, Marotte F, Hamon M, Oliviero P, Farhadian F,
Robert V, Samuel JL, Rappaport L. Accumulation of fetal fibronectin
mRNAs after balloon denudation of rabbit arteries.
Circulation. 1995;92:904911.
75.
Thyberg J, Blomgren K, Roy J, Tran PK, Hedin U.
Phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells after arterial
injury is associated with changes in the distribution of laminin and
fibronectin. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997;45:837846.
76. Osterrieder W, Muller RK, Powell JS, Clozel JP, Hefti F, Baumgartner HR. Role of angiotensin II in injury-induced neointima formation in rats. Hypertension. 1991;18(suppl II):II-60-II-64.
77.
Daemen MJ, Lombardi DM, Bosman FT, Schwartz SM.
Angiotensin II induces smooth muscle cell proliferation in
the normal and injured rat arterial wall. Circ
Res. 1991;68:450456.
78.
Kim S, Kawamura M, Wanibuchi H, Ohta K, Hamaguchi A,
Omura T, Yukimura T, Miura K, Iwao H. Angiotensin II type 1
receptor blockade inhibits the expression of immediate-early genes and
fibronectin in rat injured artery. Circulation. 1995;92:8895.
79.
Contard F, Sabri A, Glukhova M, Sartore S, Marotte F,
Pomies JP, Schiavi P, Guez D, Samuel JL, Rappaport L.
Arterial smooth muscle cell phenotype in
stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1993;22:665676.
80.
Pauletto P, Chiavegato A, Giuriato L, Scatena M, Faggin
E, Grisenti A, Sarzani R, Paci MV, Fulgeri PD, Rappelli A. Hyperplastic
growth of aortic smooth muscle cells in renovascular hypertensive
rabbits is characterized by the expansion of an immature cell
phenotype. Circ Res. 1994;74:774788.
81.
Takasaki I, Chobanian AV, Sarzani R, Brecher P. Effect
of hypertension on fibronectin expression in the rat aorta.
J Biol Chem. 1990;265:2193521939.
82. Saouaf R, Takasaki I, Eastman E, Chobanian AV, Brecher P. Fibronectin biosynthesis in the rat aorta in vitro: changes due to experimental hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:11821189.
83.
Takasaki I, Chobanian AV, Mamuya WS, Brecher P.
Hypertension induces alternatively spliced forms of fibronectin in rat
aorta. Hypertension. 1992;20:2025.
84.
Himeno H, Crawford DC, Hosoi M, Chobanian AV, Brecher
P. Angiotensin II alters aortic fibronectin independently
of hypertension. Hypertension. 1994;23:823826.
85.
Weber KT. Extracellular matrix remodeling in heart
failure: a role for de novo angiotensin II generation.
Circulation. 1997;96:40654082.
86.
Villarreal FJ, Dillmann WH. Cardiac
hypertrophy-induced changes in mRNA levels for TGF-beta 1,
fibronectin, and collagen. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:H1861 H1866.
87. Contard F, Koteliansky V, Marotte F, Dubus I, Rappaport L, Samuel JL. Specific alterations in the distribution of extracellular matrix components within rat myocardium during the development of pressure overload. Lab Invest. 1991;64:6575.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
88. Mamuya WS, Brecher P. Fibronectin expression in the normal and hypertrophic rat heart. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:392401.
89. Nagasawa K, Zimmermann R, Munkel B, Linz W, Scholkens B, Schaper J. Extracellular matrix deposition in hypertensive hearts antifibrotic effects of ramipril. Eur Heart J. 1995;16(suppl C):3337.
90. Willems IE, Arends JW, Daemen MJ. Tenascin and fibronectin expression in healing human myocardial scars. J Pathol. 1996;179:321325.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
91. Knowlton AA, Connelly CM, Romo GM, Mamuya W, Apstein CS, Brecher P. Rapid expression of fibronectin in the rabbit heart after myocardial infarction with and without reperfusion. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:10601068.
92. Ulrich MM, Janssen AM, Daemen MJ, Rappaport L, Samuel JL, Contard F, Smits JF, Cleutjens JP. Increased expression of fibronectin isoforms after myocardial infarction in rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997;29:25332543.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
93. Carlyle WC, Jacobson AW, Judd DL, Tian B, Chu C, Hauer KM, Hartman MM, McDonald KM. Delayed reperfusion alters matrix metalloproteinase activity and fibronectin mRNA expression in the infarct zone of the ligated rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997;29:24512463.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Ruoslahti E. Integrins as signaling molecules and targets for tumor therapy. Kidney Int. 1997;51:14131417.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
95. Coller BS. Platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonists: the first anti-integrin receptor therapeutics. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:14671471.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Hu, Y. Ran, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhou, S. J. Harris, L. Yu, L. Sun, J. Pan, J. Liu, J. Lou, et al. Antibody Library-based Tumor Endothelial Cells Surface Proteomic Functional Screen Reveals Migration-stimulating Factor as an Anti-angiogenic Target Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2009; 8(4): 816 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y. Lee, A. S. Martin, P. K. Mehta, A. E. Dikalova, A. M. Garrido, S. R. Datla, E. Lyons, K.-H. Krause, B. Banfi, J. D. Lambeth, et al. Mechanisms of Vascular Smooth Muscle NADPH Oxidase 1 (Nox1) Contribution to Injury-Induced Neointimal Formation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2009; 29(4): 480 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Rudolph, V. Rudolph, and S. Baldus Contribution of Myeloperoxidase to Smoking-dependent Vascular Inflammation Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2008; 5(8): 820 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Park, C. Will, B. Martin, L. Gullotti, N. Friedrichs, R. Buettner, H. Schneider, S. Ludwig, and V. Wixler Deficiency in the LIM-only protein FHL2 impairs assembly of extracellular matrix proteins FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2508 - 2520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Hocking, P. A. Titus, R. Sumagin, and I. H. Sarelius Extracellular Matrix Fibronectin Mechanically Couples Skeletal Muscle Contraction With Local Vasodilation Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 372 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tomkowicz, K. Rybinski, B. Foley, W. Ebel, B. Kline, E. Routhier, P. Sass, N. C. Nicolaides, L. Grasso, and Y. Zhou Interaction of endosialin/TEM1 with extracellular matrix proteins mediates cell adhesion and migration PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 17965 - 17970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. I. Butun, H. Ekmekci, H. Sonmez, C. Gurel, O. Ciftci, T. Ulutin, E. Kokoglu, N. Domanic, and A. Dirican Preliminary Study Showing the Relationship Between Platelet Fibronectin, Sialic Acid, and ADP-induced Aggregation Levels in Coronary Heart Disease Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, July 1, 2007; 13(3): 308 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wei, C.-H. Tang, Y. Kim, L. Robillard, F. Zhang, M. C. Kugler, and H. A. Chapman Urokinase Receptors Are Required for {alpha}5beta1 Integrin-mediated Signaling in Tumor Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3929 - 3939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Knoblauch, C. Will, G. Goncharenko, S. Ludwig, and V. Wixler The binding of Mss4 to {alpha}-integrin subunits regulates matrix metalloproteinase activation and fibronectin remodeling FASEB J, February 1, 2007; 21(2): 497 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Orr, M. H. Ginsberg, S. J. Shattil, H. Deckmyn, and M. A. Schwartz Matrix-specific Suppression of Integrin Activation in Shear Stress Signaling Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2006; 17(11): 4686 - 4697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Mosher Plasma Fibronectin Concentration: A Risk Factor for Arterial Thrombosis? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2006; 26(6): 1193 - 1195. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Boisvert, D. M. Rose, K. A. Johnson, M. E. Fuentes, S. A. Lira, L. K. Curtiss, and R. A. Terkeltaub Up-Regulated Expression of the CXCR2 Ligand KC/GRO-{alpha} in Atherosclerotic Lesions Plays a Central Role in Macrophage Accumulation and Lesion Progression Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2006; 168(4): 1385 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Barker, G. Baneyx, M. Cardo-Vila, G. A. Workman, M. Weaver, P. M. Menon, S. Dedhar, S. A. Rempel, W. Arap, R. Pasqualini, et al. SPARC Regulates Extracellular Matrix Organization through Its Modulation of Integrin-linked Kinase Activity J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 36483 - 36493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Fogelgren, N. Polgar, K. M. Szauter, Z. Ujfaludi, R. Laczko, K. S. K. Fong, and K. Csiszar Cellular Fibronectin Binds to Lysyl Oxidase with High Affinity and Is Critical for Its Proteolytic Activation J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24690 - 24697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Buzza, L. Zamurs, J. Sun, C. H. Bird, A. I. Smith, J. A. Trapani, C. J. Froelich, E. C. Nice, and P. I. Bird Extracellular Matrix Remodeling by Human Granzyme B via Cleavage of Vitronectin, Fibronectin, and Laminin J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 23549 - 23558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ekmekci, O. B. Ekmekci, H. Sonmez, Z. Ozturk, N. Domanic, and E. Kokoglu Evaluation of Fibronectin, Vitronectin, and Leptin Levels in Coronary Artery Disease: Impacts on Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 63 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Suresh, S. K. Singh, and A. Agrawal Interaction of Calcium-bound C-reactive Protein with Fibronectin Is Controlled by pH: IN VIVO IMPLICATIONS J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 52552 - 52557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Andres Atherogenic role of the type EIIIA fibronectin domain Blood, July 1, 2004; 104(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Gildner, A. L. Lerner, and D. C. Hocking Fibronectin matrix polymerization increases tensile strength of model tissue Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): H46 - H53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Probst, R Fijnheer, P Schellekens, and A Rothova Intraocular and plasma levels of cellular fibronectin in patients with uveitis and diabetes mellitus Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2004; 88(5): 667 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Boldt, U Wetzel, J Lauschke, J Weigl, J Gummert, G Hindricks, H Kottkamp, and S Dhein Fibrosis in left atrial tissue of patients with atrial fibrillation with and without underlying mitral valve disease Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 400 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. I. Willis, D. Pierre-Paul, B. E. Sumpio, and V. Gahtan Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Migration: Current Research and Clinical Implications Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2004; 38(1): 11 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Hocking and C. H. Chang Fibronectin matrix polymerization regulates small airway epithelial cell migration Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): L169 - L179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Cheng, M. Abdel-Ghany, and B. U. Pauli A Novel Consensus Motif in Fibronectin Mediates Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Adhesion and Metastasis J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24600 - 24607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Wilson, A. V. Ljubimov, A. O. Morla, S. Caballero, L. C. Shaw, P. E. Spoerri, R. W. Tarnuzzer, and M. B. Grant Fibronectin Fragments Promote Human Retinal Endothelial Cell Adhesion and Proliferation and ERK Activation through {alpha}5{beta}1 Integrin and PI 3-Kinase Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 1704 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Hocking Fibronectin Matrix Deposition and Cell Contractility: Implications for Airway Remodeling in Asthma Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6_suppl): 275S - 278S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. J. van Greevenbroek, V. M. M-J. Vermeulen, and T. W. A. de Bruin Familial combined hyperlipidemia plasma stimulates protein secretion by HepG2 cells: identification of fibronectin in the differential secretion proteome J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2002; 43(11): 1846 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhao, L. Yue, D. Gu, and T. Mazzone Regulation of Macrophage ApoE Expression and Processing by Extracellular Matrix J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 2002; 277(33): 29477 - 29483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Majors, S. Sengupta, B. Willard, M. T. Kinter, R. E. Pyeritz, and D. W. Jacobsen Homocysteine Binds to Human Plasma Fibronectin and Inhibits Its Interaction With Fibrin Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2002; 22(8): 1354 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Billings, J. C. Whitbeck, C. S. Adams, W. R. Abrams, A. J. Cohen, B. N. Engelsberg, P. S. Howard, and J. Rosenbloom The Transforming Growth Factor-beta -inducible Matrix Protein beta ig-h3 Interacts with Fibronectin J. Biol. Chem., July 26, 2002; 277(31): 28003 - 28009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Hocking and K. Kowalski A cryptic fragment from fibronectin's III1 module localizes to lipid rafts and stimulates cell growth and contractility J. Cell Biol., July 8, 2002; 158(1): 175 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pereira, B. J. Rybarczyk, T. M. Odrljin, D. C. Hocking, J. Sottile, and P. J. Simpson-Haidaris The incorporation of fibrinogen into extracellular matrix is dependent on active assembly of a fibronectin matrix J. Cell Sci., January 2, 2002; 115(3): 609 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. E. Olorundare, O. Peyruchaud, R. M. Albrecht, and D. F. Mosher Assembly of a fibronectin matrix by adherent platelets stimulated by lysophosphatidic acid and other agonists Blood, July 1, 2001; 98(1): 117 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Beumer, G. J. Heijnen-Snyder, M. J. W. IJsseldijk, P. G. de Groot, and J. J. Sixma Fibronectin in an Extracellular Matrix of Cultured Endothelial Cells Supports Platelet Adhesion via Its Ninth Type III Repeat : A Comparison With Platelet Adhesion to Isolated Fibronectin Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2000; 20 (4): e16 - e25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim, K. Bell, S. A. Mousa, and J. A. Varner Regulation of Angiogenesis in Vivo by Ligation of Integrin {alpha}5{beta}1 with the Central Cell-Binding Domain of Fibronectin Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2000; 156(4): 1345 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Hocking, J. Sottile, and K. J. Langenbach Stimulation of Integrin-mediated Cell Contractility by Fibronectin Polymerization J. Biol. Chem., March 31, 2000; 275(14): 10673 - 10682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Pickering, L. H. Chow, S. Li, K. A. Rogers, E. F. Rocnik, R. Zhong, and B. M. C. Chan {alpha}5{beta}1 Integrin Expression and Luminal Edge Fibronectin Matrix Assembly by Smooth Muscle Cells after Arterial Injury Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2000; 156(2): 453 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P Moiseeva, Q. Javed, E. L Spring, and D. P de Bono Galectin 1 is involved in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation Cardiovasc Res, January 14, 2000; 45(2): 493 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Tomasini-Johansson, N. R. Kaufman, M. G. Ensenberger, V. Ozeri, E. Hanski, and D. F. Mosher A 49-Residue Peptide from Adhesin F1 of Streptococcus pyogenes Inhibits Fibronectin Matrix Assembly J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2001; 276(26): 23430 - 23439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |