Original Contributions |
From the Comparative Medicine Clinical Research Center and the Department of Comparative Medicine of the Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Correspondence to Thomas C. Register, PhD, Department of Comparative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1040. E-mail tregister{at}cpm.wfubmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: collagen elastin plaque stability aortic aneurysm
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generally, women do not develop clinically significant coronary heart disease until some time after menopause, perhaps owing to the antiatherogenic effects associated with normal ovarian function.10 Despite this protection during the premenopausal years, coronary heart disease is still the leading cause of death in women >60 years of age. Estrogen replacement therapy with and without opposing progestins has been shown to extend this "female protection" after the cessation of ovarian function due to surgical or natural causes in both a nonhuman primate model11 and in women.12 The beneficial effects of estrogen were only partially accounted for by its effects on circulating lipids in these studies, suggesting that direct effects on the artery wall also were important. One potential site of action for estrogen is arterial matrix production, and several investigators have suggested that estrogen may influence arterial collagen synthesis in vivo13 14 15 and in vitro.16
The present study was designed to determine whether estrogen replacement therapy alone or with an added progestin (hormone replacement therapy) had a beneficial effect on atherosclerosis when combined with plasma lipid lowering. A previous report described the results of this study with respect to plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, morphometrically determined coronary artery atherosclerosis, and coronary artery vasomotion.17 The current report describes the effects of these hormone therapies on the arterial biochemical changes associated with regression, especially with respect to connective tissue composition.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Aortic Measurements
At necropsy, the abdominal aorta was carefully cleaned of
adventitial tissue, opened longitudinally along the posterior surface,
and sectioned into segments for histological evaluation
and determination of chemical composition. Five separate segments of
the abdominal aorta from proximal (No. 1, below the renal arteries) to
distal (No. 5, above the iliac arteries) areas were obtained. Sections
1, 3, and 5 were used for histology and sections 2 and 4 were frozen
for biochemical analyses. Results obtained from sections 3, 4,
and 5 are presented here.
Histological Analysis
Sections 3 and 5 were cut perpendicular to the long axis of the
longitudinally opened abdominal aorta, pinned out on cardboard, and
then fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin. One
histological section was made from each block and
stained with Verhoeffvan Gieson's stain. These sections were
projected, and the cross-sectional areas of intimal lesions (which
were composed of fatty streaks, plaque, or both) were measured by using
a digitizer. Atherosclerosis extent was expressed as
the cross-sectional area of intimal lesions in millimeters squared. The
IEL lengths of the opened sections were also measured. Artery size was
estimated by using the IEL length as a circumference for mathematical
derivation of the area encompassed by the IEL, the IEL area:
IELA=
(IEL/2
)2 . Lumen area was then
estimated by subtracting the intimal area from the IELA.
Aortic Lipid Composition
The segments used for chemical composition studies (section 4 as
described above) were
1 cm2 and weighed
60
mg. These sections were pinned flat on a dissection board and
photographed for subsequent determination of surface areas by using a
Summagraphics morphometer and software (Woods Hole Educational
Associates). Wet weights were obtained from tissue that had been
blotted to remove surface liquid. Lipids were extracted from these
tissues with 20 volumes (vol/wt) of chloroform-methanol (3:1, vol/vol).
The LFDWs were determined by drying in vacuo to a constant weight.
Tissue cholesterol content (free and esterified) was
determined by the method of Rudel and
Morris.18
Aortic Calcium Content
The lipid-free dry artery was rehydrated and decalcified with
0.1 mol/L HCl at 4°C for 7 days. Calcium content of the acid extract
was determined using Arsenazo III reagent and protocols supplied with
Roche Reagents' "Reagent for calcium" (Roche
Diagnostic Systems), except that all measurements were
carried out using a microtiter plate reader (Biotek EL-340) at 630 nm
with background correction at 450 nm. Calcium standards were prepared
and assayed under the same conditions as were samples (in 0.1 mol/L
HCl). The decalcified, delipidated tissue was again dried to a constant
weight (decalcified LFDWs).
Aortic Collagen and Elastin Contents
Tissues were rehydrated in deionized water at 4°C for several
days, and collagen was solubilized from the tissue by hot alkali
extraction at 98°C in 0.1N NaOH for 50 minutes in a shaking water
bath.19 The insoluble material (elastin) was
separated from the soluble collagen by centrifugation,
washed with 0.1 mol/L NaOH and then with deionized water, and dried
under vacuum to constant weight. The extracted collagen fraction was
acid hydrolyzed in 6 mol/L HCl at 108°C for 17 hours, and
hydroxyproline content was determined by the method of Bergman and
Loxley20 to estimate collagen content.
Expression of Data
Angiochemical measurements were expressed on a concentration
basis (milligrams per gram of wet or lipid-free dry aorta) and on an
area basis (milligrams per centimeter squared of flat aorta). In
general, the use of wet weight of the tissue tends to underestimate the
amount of a component per unit tissue, as increases in lipid and cell
contents of the atherosclerotic aorta increase the wet weight of the
tissue. The weight of the tissue after lipid extraction (LFDW, in
grams) gives a more accurate estimate of the unit of tissue but is
subject to change as a result of connective tissue changes in the
artery. The surface area of a tissue section (in millimeters squared)
is less likely to be altered by chemical changes but can be affected by
vascular remodeling (shrinkage or enlargement) and is less accurately
measured, especially in tissue that has been previously frozen.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed by ANOVA. Owing to the complicated
nature of the studies investigating the biochemistry of regression of
atherosclerosis, ANOVA was carried out using 2 separate
approaches. Initially, all data were analyzed by a 1x4 ANOVA
that included the baseline group as well as the 3 regression groups, a
design that allowed for a comparison of the chemical composition of the
3 regression groups with that of the baseline animals. The purpose of
the baseline group, a subgroup of animals randomly sampled from the
entire study population before initiation of the lipid-lowering diet,
was to provide a means of assessment of the extent of
atherosclerosis before regression commenced. In effect,
this provides a means to estimate alterations occurring in the artery
during the period of lipid lowering. In addition, data from only the
regression groups, which were subjected to dietary manipulation for 30
more months, were analyzed by a 1x3 ANOVA excluding the
baseline animals from the analysis. This allowed for a better
assessment of differences between the individual regression groups.
Variables not meeting homogeneity of variance assumptions were
subjected to logarithmic transformation. Means and SDs of the data are
presented. Post hoc analysis was performed by
multiple-comparison tests with Bonferroni-adjusted significance levels
for the number of tests in each analysis. There were 6 post hoc
comparisons in the 1x4 ANOVA as follows: baseline versus (1) control,
(2) CEE, and (3) CEE+MPA; control versus (4) CEE and (5) CEE+MPA; and
(6) CEE versus CEE+MPA. There were 3 post hoc comparisons in the 1x3
ANOVA as follows: (1) control versus CEE, (2) control versus CEE+MPA,
and (3) CEE versus CEE+MPA. Significance levels given in the text are
the result of post hoc tests. Significance levels of the ANOVA are
presented in the tables.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
16.8 mmol/L. There were no differences
between experimental groups in plasma lipid or lipoprotein
concentrations before the onset of the regression diet and hormone
treatment. The regression diet resulted in a lowering of TPC levels of
3.90 to 4.15 mmol/L.
Aortic Morphometric Analysis
Results of histomorphometric analysis of sections of the
abdominal aorta immediately proximal (section 3) and distal (section 5)
to the segment used for biochemical analysis (section 4) are
shown in Table 1
. Plaque size and lumen
area were not different between groups for either section, although
there was a trend toward increased plaque size and lumen area in the
proximal section of the control group. Artery size (as estimated by
IELA) of the control group was greater than that of the baseline group
(P<0.05), although this effect was not seen in the distal
section (P>0.10). No significant effects were observed when
the regression groups were considered separately (Table 2
).
|
|
Aortic Lipid Composition
The biochemical composition of the abdominal aortas of each group
are shown in Table 3
, and statistical
results obtained from these data are presented in Table 4
. After 2 years of the atherogenic diet,
the abdominal aortas of the baseline group had very high
cholesterol contents (
14 µg cholesterol
per milligram wet weight) compared with normal arteries (
1 to 2 µg
cholesterol per milligram wet weight) as previously
described.5 6 21 All 3 regression groups had
reduced aortic cholesterol contents relative to the
baseline group, as shown by 1x4 ANOVA (Table 4
), whether expressed per
unit of tissue wet weight, per unit of tissue LFDW (Figure 2
), or on an area basis (all
P<0.05). The abdominal aortic cholesterol
levels for the regression groups were
40% of those in the baseline
group. No differences between the individual regression groups were
found, as shown by 1x3 ANOVA (Table 4
). The differences in TPC content
between the baseline and regression groups reflected lower levels of
both free cholesterol and esterified
cholesterol in the regression groups. No effects of
estrogen replacement therapy (CEE) or hormone replacement therapy
(CEE+MPA) were observed for total, free, or esterified
cholesterol contents in the abdominal aorta. The lower TPC
content in the regression groups resulted in large part from a
reduction in esterified cholesterol levels.
|
|
|
Aortic Connective Tissue and Mineral Contents
Abdominal aortic connective tissue compositions were different
between groups. Elastin content of the abdominal aorta was altered by
the lipid-lowering regimen, as shown by 1x4 ANOVA (Table 4
), because
the control and CEE+MPA groups had a lower proportion of elastin per
unit weight or area than did the baseline group (both
P<0.05, Figure 3
). The
elastin content of the aorta of the CEE group was not different from
that of baseline (P>0.10). No statistical differences were
observed when the 3 regression groups were considered separately (all
P>0.10).
|
Aortic collagen content was different between groups, as shown by both
1x4 and 1x3 ANOVAs (Table 4
and Figure 4
). When all 4 groups were
analyzed together, aortic hydroxyproline content (as a measure
of aortic collagen) expressed per unit LFDW was higher in the control
and CEE+MPA groups than in the baseline group (both
P<0.05). Hydroxyproline content of the CEE group was not
different from the baseline group (P>0.10). When the 3
regression groups were analyzed by 1x3 ANOVA, aortic collagen
content (milligrams per gram LFDW) of the CEE groups was lower than
that of the control group (P<0.05) and tended to be lower
than that of the CEE+MPA group (P=0.10). No differences
among groups were found when hydroxyproline was expressed on an area
basis, although there was a trend toward an increase in the control
group relative to baseline (P=0.10).
|
The calcium content of the abdominal aortas within groups was extremely variable, because some artery sections contained complicated lesions with calcified areas. No differences were found between any groups with respect to aortic calcium content, whether expressed on a weight or area basis, or when analyzed in the regression groups only (all P>0.10).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the current study, plaque size in the abdominal aorta did not
decrease during the regression phase of the trial, despite the
biochemical changes in lipids that reflected plaque regression. As
previously reported, coronary artery plaque size also did not
decrease with plasma lipid lowering in these
animals.17 Cholesterol content in the
abdominal aorta was reduced in animals consuming a lipid-lowering diet
for 30 months compared with the baseline group, suggesting an efflux of
lipid (to
40% of baseline levels) from the artery during the
regression phase. The regression-induced decreases in aortic
cholesterol were not affected by the CEE or CEE+MPA
therapies. The aortic cholesterol levels of the regression
groups (5 to 6 µg/mg wet weight) remained higher than in normal
aortas (1 to 2 µg/mg wet weight) on the basis of previous
studies.5 6 21 Malinow22
obtained similar findings in female cynomolgus macaques fed an
atherogenic diet for 6 months and then a plasma lipidlowering diet
for 18 months. Aortic cholesterol content was lower in
regression groups than in baseline animals but remained higher than
that of normal aortas.
In a previous study of atherosclerosis regression in
male rhesus monkeys, animals with 19 months of diet-induced
hyperlipidemia (TPC concentrations of
800 mg/dL)
underwent dietary lipid lowering (TPC concentrations of 180 to 220
mg/dL) for 24 or 48 months, resulting in an abdominal aortic
cholesterol concentration of
2 to 3 mg/g wet aorta
compared with baseline levels of
10 mg/g wet
aorta.5 6 These levels were only slightly higher
than the cholesterol content of the abdominal aorta (
1.5
mg/g wet aorta) from nonatherosclerotic animals.5
The atherogenic and regression diets in that rhesus study contained
40% of calories as fat (lard) and differed only in the dietary
cholesterol content in the regression phase, which was
modified to achieve TPC concentrations in the 200 or 300 mg/dL
range.23 The abdominal aortas of the group with
TPC concentrations in the 300 mg/dL range contained
6 µg
cholesterol per milligram wet weight, which is comparable
to that observed in the current study. However, the regression group
with TPC concentrations in the 200 mg/dL range (comparable to the TPC
concentrations of 170 to 180 mg/dL in the regression phase of the
current study) achieved a more complete return of aortic
cholesterol toward normal levels than found in the current
study, despite the higher overall dietary fat content (40% of calories
versus 30%) during the regression phase. Differences between the two
studies that might account for this result include (1) a longer
induction phase in the current study (24 months versus 19 months), (2)
differences between induction and regression diets other than fat
calories (eg, the inclusion of butter in the progression phase of the
current study), (3) differences in atherosclerosis
(aortic cholesterol content) at baseline that were slightly
greater in the current study (
14 mg cholesterol per gram
of wet aorta versus 11 mg per gram of wet aorta in the rhesus study),
(4) differences between males and females, (5) species differences
between rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys, or (6) other unknown
factors.
The continued presence of elevated cholesterol concentrations in the abdominal aorta may have resulted from the moderate lipid-lowering diet, which is comparable to that recommended by the American Heart Association (30% of calories as fat and the equivalent of 100 mg cholesterol/d per person). It is possible that a more aggressive approach with respect to dietary fat and cholesterol or a longer exposure to the lipid-lowering diet might have resulted in continued loss of the cholesterol from the artery. It is unclear which effects estrogen replacement therapy or hormone replacement therapy would have on lipid or connective tissue changes under such circumstances.
The preferential reduction of cholesterol ester over free cholesterol in the regression groups is consistent with that observed in previous studies.3 5 6 The lack of an effect of estrogen replacement on aortic cholesterol may reflect a relatively minor influence of estrogen on regression compared with the large effect of the lipid-lowering diet. It is currently unknown whether estrogen plays a role in arterial cholesterol efflux, although some investigators have suggested that arterial lipoprotein uptake and degradation may be influenced by estrogen.24
Connective tissue content of the abdominal aorta was affected by both regression and treatment. Collagen content (as estimated by hydroxyproline content per LFDW) was higher in the control and CEE+MPA groups than in the baseline animals, with intermediate levels in the CEE-only treatment group. Abdominal aortic elastin content was lower in the control and CEE+MPA groups than in the baseline group, again with the CEE-only group having intermediate levels. Aortic collagen and elastin contents of the CEE group were not different from those of the baseline, control, or CEE+MPA groups when the 4 study groups were analyzed together. However, restriction of the analysis to the 3 regression groups demonstrated that CEE aortic collagen was lower than that of the control group and tended to be lower than that of the CEE+MPA group. Taken together, the results demonstrate that CEE inhibited collagen accumulation associated with atherosclerosis regression and suggest that MPA may antagonize that effect.
Interestingly, several recent studies have reported that MPA attenuated or reversed the beneficial effects of CEE on a number of vascular end points or cardiovascular risk factors.25 26 27 28 In 1 report, the development of diet-induced coronary artery atherosclerosis in ovariectomized animals was inhibited by CEE therapy, whereas the addition of MPA to the CEE regimen completely abolished the CEE effect.25 Other studies have shown that the beneficial effect of CEE on coronary artery vasomotor reactivity was attenuated by MPA given either cyclically or continuously.26 Nevertheless, the reversal of the atheroprotective effect of CEE by MPA may not apply to all progestins, as cyclic progesterone implants had no negative impact on the protective effect of continuous 17ß-estradiol implants against diet-induced coronary artery atherosclerosis in a previous study.11 These discrepancies in hormone effects on the cardiovascular system are important and could be related to the type of estrogen, the type of progestin, or the frequency or route of administration, demonstrating the need for more work in this area.
The prevention of aortic collagen accumulation in the CEE group may
have been mediated through direct effects of estrogens on
arterial cell metabolism. Collagen synthesis
has been shown to be inhibited by 17ß-estradiol in cultured aortic
smooth muscle cells, whereas no effect on cell proliferation was
observed.16 This effect may be regulated through
specific receptors for estrogens, since aortic smooth muscle cells have
been shown to express mRNA for both the classic estrogen receptor
(ER
) and the newly described ERß.29 Specific
receptor-mediated mechanisms by which estrogen may control collagen
metabolism remain to be determined, especially since recent
studies suggest that ligand-specific effects may be regulated
differently through ER
or ERß, depending on the composition of the
regulatory regions of individual genes.30
The expression of results per unit artery area reduces the impact of changes in arterial composition and mass that occur during atherosclerosis progression and regression. Lesion progression is accompanied by increases in the numbers of macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and other cells in the intima, along with alterations in the lesion contents. Regression is accompanied by efflux of lipid and other modifications. When expressed on an area basis, the elastin content was lower in the control and CEE+MPA groups than in the baseline animals, suggesting that loss of elastin occurred during regression in these animals. Although the collagen content per unit area was not statistically different between groups, regression groups tended to have higher amounts of collagen per unit area than did the baseline group. Given these changes, the abdominal aortas from the control and CEE+MPA groups would be expected to be less elastic or compliant.
Armstrong and Megan3 studied
atherosclerosis regression in male cynomolgus macaques
fed an atherogenic diet (1.2% cholesterol) for 17 months
followed by a low-fat, cholesterol-free regression diet for
up to 20 months. Collagen concentration (milligrams of collagen per
gram LFDW) increased as a result of diet-induced
atherosclerosis, with 50% to 75% increases in the
more elastic arteries (eg, aorta, common carotid, and subclavian) and
33% increases in the more muscular arteries (eg, coronary and
femoral) compared with nonatherosclerotic controls. Collagen
concentrations of the aortas obtained from the group undergoing 7
months of plasma lipid lowering were
10% higher than those of
aortas from the atherosclerotic baseline group. Elastin, expressed per
unit arterial weight or length, was highest in the baseline
group and lower in the regression groups. Their findings are comparable
to those of the present study. However, expression of collagen and
elastin per unit of artery length gave a slightly different result;
aortic collagen content was slightly lower in the 20-month regression
groups than in baseline, suggesting that collagen also was being lost
from the tissue.3 That finding contrasts with
results from the current study using female cynomolgus monkeys and in
previous studies using male rhesus monkeys on a moderate regression
diet,5 6 in which aortic collagen increased in
the regression groups. It is possible that regression induced by the
low-fat, no-cholesterol diets in the study of Armstrong and
Megan3 may have facilitated the reduction of the
absolute amounts of collagen from the aorta, as opposed to a diet with
moderate amounts of fat and cholesterol, such as that in
the present study and in previous
studies.5 6
Histomorphometric analysis of a midsection of the abdominal
aorta showed that the control group had increased artery size (ie,
IELA) and a trend toward increased lumen size than did the baseline
group, suggesting that remodeling of the artery to a larger size had
occurred. Unfortunately, the size of the abdominal aorta can only be
estimated in our report, because the sections were not perfusion fixed
under pressure. Lumen stenosis of the coronary arteries
was lower than baseline in the regression groups in the reports by
Malinow,22 although this effect may have been the
result of artery remodeling31 and not due to
reductions in actual plaque area. Zarins et al32
examined the relationship between the regression of diet-induced
atherosclerosis and enlargement of the aorta in male
cynomolgus monkeys. They found a reduced abdominal aortic medial
thickness, along with a preferential enlargement of the abdominal aorta
(shown histologically by lumen area and by increased
area encompassed by internal elastic lamina), in 6 animals fed a
progression diet for 6 months followed by a regression diet for 6
months, compared with a baseline group (n=6) necropsied after 6 months
of progression. The loss of aortic elastin during regression seen in
the current and previous studies3 5 6 could be a
factor in subsequent aortic enlargement and may have important
implications for the development of AAAs, especially after regression
of atherosclerosis. AAA rupture is a significant cause
of mortality in the elderly and an important health problem; up to 14%
of the male population >65 has measurable aneurysmal
development. The incidence of AAA in the female population >65 is
6%, because AAA development in women appears to lag
10 years
behind that of men, perhaps due to the protective effects of estrogen
over their lifetime.33 Nevertheless, the
incidence of AAA in both sexes increases with age, and thus, the
clinical significance of AAA will also increase as the population
ages.
Our results demonstrate that abdominal aortas of surgically menopausal female cynomolgus monkeys with diet-induced atherosclerosis undergo chemical remodeling in the wake of a lipid-lowering diet patterned after that recommended by the American Heart Association. In addition, detrimental connective tissue changes generally associated with lesion regression (ie, the accumulation of collagen and the loss of elastin) may be inhibited by CEE treatment. These beneficial effects may be antagonized by MPA. Although plaque area did not decrease as a result of plasma lipid lowering, the reduction in cholesterol and cholesterol ester in the lesions may lead to more stable plaques, reducing the potential for plaque rupture and therefore providing a clinical benefit. An additional benefit of plasma lipid lowering may relate to improvement in vascular tone, since the paradoxical constriction to acetylcholine infusion commonly seen in atherosclerotic animals during the progression phase was not seen in the regression groups in this study.17 This improvement in vascular tone may also decrease the likelihood of plaque rupture.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 15, 1997; accepted February 10, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ERß at AP1 sites. Science. 1997;277:15081510.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A. Booth and B. R. Lucchesi Medroxyprogesterone acetate prevents the cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of 17beta-estradiol in an in vivo model of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1408 - H1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Tannen, M. G. Weiner, D. Xie, and K. Barnhart Estrogen affects post-menopausal women differently than estrogen plus progestin replacement therapy Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1769 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Simoncini, A. Caruso, S. Garibaldi, X.-D. Fu, M. S. Giretti, C. Baldacci, C. Scorticati, L. Fornari, P. Mannella, and A. R. Genazzani Activation of nitric oxide synthesis in human endothelial cells using nomegestrol acetate. Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2006; 108(4): 969 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Simoncini, P. Mannella, L. Fornari, A. Caruso, M. Y. Willis, S. Garibaldi, C. Baldacci, and A. R. Genazzani Differential Signal Transduction of Progesterone and Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Human Endothelial Cells Endocrinology, December 1, 2004; 145(12): 5745 - 5756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Greenwood and R. Parasuraman Normal Genetic Variation, Cognition, and Aging Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, December 1, 2003; 2(4): 278 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yaffe Hormone Therapy and the Brain: Deja Vu All Over Again? JAMA, May 28, 2003; 289(20): 2717 - 2719. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Stein and O. Stein Does Therapeutic Intervention Achieve Slowing of Progression or Bona Fide Regression of Atherosclerotic Lesions? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2001; 21(2): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. C. Rosano, C. M. Webb, S. Chierchia, G. Luigi Morgani, M. Gabraele, P. M. Sarrel, D. de Ziegler, and P. Collins Natural progesterone, but not medroxyprogesterone acetate, enhances the beneficial effect of estrogen on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in postmenopausal women J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2154 - 2159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Mather, E. G. Norman, J. C. Prior, and T. G. Elliott Preserved Forearm Endothelial Responses with Acute Exposure to Progesterone: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of 17-{beta} Estradiol, Progesterone, and 17-{beta} Estradiol with Progesterone in Healthy Menopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4644 - 4649. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Pinkerton and R. Santen Alternatives to the Use of Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1999; 20(3): 308 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |