Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1998;18:1101-1107

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westerveld, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Erkelens, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westerveld, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Erkelens, D. W.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1998;18:1101-1107.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Apolipoprotein B and Coronary Artery Disease in Women

A Cross-sectional Study in Women Undergoing Their First Coronary Angiography

H. Tineke Westerveld; Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep; Henk W. O. Roeters van Lennep; An-Ho Liem; Job A. J. de Boo; Yvonne T. van der Schouw; ; D. Willem Erkelens

From the Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht (H.T.W., D.W.E.); the Department of Cardiology, Oosterschelde Hospital Goes, Goes (J.E.R. van L., H.W.O.R. van L., A.-H.L., J.A.J. de B.); and the Julius Center for Patient-Oriented Research, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht (Y.T. van der S.), the Netherlands.

Correspondence to H.E. Westerveld, MD, University Hospital Utrecht, G02.228 Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, PO Box 85.500, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands. E-mail h.e.westerveld{at}digd.azu.nl


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—The association between plasma apolipoprotein (apo) B concentrations and angiographically determined coronary artery disease (CAD) was investigated in women in a cross-sectional study. Stenosis of >60% in 1 or more coronary arteries was classified as CAD+. CAD- was defined as a maximum stenosis of 10% in any coronary artery. Fasting plasma concentrations of apoB, apoA-I, cholesterol (chol), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-chol), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-chol), and triglycerides (TGs) were determined. Information on nonlipid risk factors was obtained from questionnaires. CAD+ women (n=160) were older than CAD- women (n=129), 64.0±7.8 vs 57.8±11.1 years, respectively. CAD+ compared with CAD- women had higher frequencies of diabetes (14.7% vs 5.8%, P=0.05), hypertension (53% vs 37%, P=0.018), and ever-smoking (48% vs 35%, P<0.001). CAD+ women had higher plasma concentrations of apoB (1.48±0.32 vs 1.25±0.34 g/L, P<0.001), chol (7.01±1.19 vs 6.38±1.22 mmol/L, P=0.001), LDL-chol (4.74±1.09 vs 4.13±1.13 mmol/L, P<0.001), and TGs (1.98±0.84 vs 1.71±0.93 mmol/L, P=0.007) and lower levels of HDL-chol (1.28±0.28 vs 1.37±1.38 mmol/L, P=0.028). After correction for nonlipid risk factors, apoB, chol, LDL-chol, HDL-chol, and TG were independently related to CAD. In the lowest quartiles of chol, LDL-chol, and TG, CAD+ women had higher apoB concentrations than CAD- women. In contrast, chol, LDL-chol, TG, or HDL-chol levels were not different in any quartile of apoB. ApoB showed the most significant relation with the number of stenotic vessels, and apoB was associated with CAD in the normolipidemic subgroup. In conclusion, apoB was superior to chol, LDL-chol, HDL-chol, TG, and apoA-I in discriminating between CAD+ and CAD-.


Key Words: apolipoprotein B • coronary artery disease • coronary angiography • women


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
The atherogenic lipoprotein particles LDL, VLDL remnants, or IDL, and chylomicron remnants each contain 1 molecule of apoB as the structural protein. The plasma apoB concentration reflects the number of atherogenic lipoproteins, and studies in men have demonstrated that apoB can be a valuable predictor for CAD.1 2

Data on apoB as a risk indicator for CAD in women are limited.1 Although CAD is the major cause of death in women, the absolute numbers of clinical manifestations of CAD are low.3 4 5 6 Thus, long-term studies in large numbers of women are required to evaluate the impact of risk factors on CAD. Studies with surrogate end points, such as coronary angiograms, are useful.

ApoB has been associated with angiographically determined CAD in a small group of Asiatic women7 and in women with premature (<60 years) CAD.8 ApoB was also related to CAD in a larger angiography study that included women on lipid-lowering medication and women for whom nonfasting lipid measurements were available.9 Fasting plasma samples are essential for comparison between different lipid parameters because TG concentrations increase10 11 12 and HDL-chol concentrations decrease in the postprandial state in both men10 and women.11 13 In the current angiography study in a large group of women, only fasting plasma samples were used for determination of lipids and apolipoproteins. Angiographies were performed in a community-referral hospital. No age or lipid selection criteria were used in an attempt to obtain a representative sample of women from the general population referred for angiography. We investigated whether apoB was an independent risk factor for CAD and whether apoB was superior to chol, LDL-chol, HDL-chol, TG, or apoA-I in discriminating between CAD+ and CAD- women. Frequency distributions of age, lipids, and apolipoproteins in CAD+ and CAD- women were also obtained.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
Design
This cross-sectional study was performed in a community-referral cardiology clinic in the southwestern part of the Netherlands, the Oosterschelde Hospital Goes. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital, and all subjects gave their informed consent before participation in the study.

Study Population
The study population consisted of women who were undergoing their first coronary angiography between January 1992 and January 1997. The indications for angiography were suspicion of CAD or preoperative screening for CAD in subjects with valvular disease. Women undergoing elective angiographies were included to avoid the influence of stress situations, such as a myocardial infarction, on plasma lipids. Women using lipid-lowering medication were excluded from analysis. Plasma concentrations of chol, TGs, HDL-chol, LDL-chol, apoA-I, and apoB were determined after an overnight fast during the week preceding the angiography.

Angiography
Coronary angiographies were performed according to the standard Judkins technique.14 Women were classified as CAD+ if 1 or more coronary arteries had a stenosis >60% on visual examination. The other women were classified as CAD-.

Lipids and Apolipoproteins
Chol and TG concentrations were measured enzymatically (Vitros analyzer, Johnson & Johnson). HDL-chol fractions were prepared by precipitation from plasma of the apoB-containing lipoproteins with the use of dextran sulfate and MgCl2.10 Plasma LDL-chol was calculated by using the Friedewald formula (total chol-[HDL-chol]-[0.45xTG]). ApoA-I and apoB were measured by immunonephelometry on a Beckman array protein system. Beckman reagents, calibrators, and standards were used. From June 1995 onward, the reference values for apoB were changed as a result of international standardization according to IFCC/WHO standards (SP3–07). The assigned values according to IFCC/WHO standards for apoB after June 1995 were identical to those before June 1995 multiplied by 0.82. In the current study the old values were converted to new values. ApoA-I reference values, based on SP1–01, did not change.

Clinical and Lifestyle Characteristics
Questionnaires were sent to the participants to retrospectively obtain self-reported information about clinical and lifestyle characteristics during the year preceding coronary angiography. Height and weight were recorded. Women were classified as never-smokers, past smokers, or current smokers. Diabetes was diagnosed as non insulin-dependent if the age of onset was >30 years and the first treatment was with diet modification or oral hypoglycemic medication. Diabetes was diagnosed as insulin dependent if the age of onset was <20 years and the first treatment was with insulin. The diagnosis of diabetes with an onset between 20 and 30 years of age was obtained from the patient's records. Women were diagnosed as hypertensive if a physician had told them they had hypertension or if they were using antihypertensive medication. Family history was considered positive if at least 1 of the parents, siblings, or children had manifestations of cardiovascular disease before the age of 60 years. Ages at menarche and, if appropriate, at menopause (surgical or natural) were recorded. Finally, the premenopausal use of oral contraceptives and the postmenopausal use of HRT in any form were recorded.

Statistics
Logistic regression was used to analyze the influence of continuous and dichotomous variables on the presence of CAD (the dependent variable). ANCOVA with age as a covariate was used to analyze the effect of lipid and apolipoprotein values on 1-, 2-, or 3-vessel disease. Student's t tests for independent samples were used to analyze differences in apoB concentrations between CAD- and CAD+ groups for each quartile of the other lipid or apolipoprotein variable. Because the distribution of TG values was skewed, all TG calculations were performed after logarithmic transformation. Values are expressed as mean±SD. Two-tailed P values <0.05 were considered significant. The SPSS (SPSS) software program was used.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
In the 5-year interval between 1992 and 1997, 289 women met the inclusion criteria. By January 1997, 10 women had died and 3 women were considered ineligible to fill out the questionnaire (according to their general practitioners) because of dementia, hypochondria, and analphabetism, respectively. Seven women had changed their places of residence without leaving their new addresses. Two hundred sixty-nine questionnaires were mailed, and 235 (87%) were returned and adequately filled out. Therefore, information on nonlipid risk factors was available for 235 of the 289 women (81%). The women who did not receive or return questionnaires (n=57) were older than the responders (64.33±9.68 versus 61.12±9.95 years, P=0.028), but the plasma concentrations of chol, TGs, LDL-chol, HDL-chol, apoA-I, and apoB and the distribution of CAD- and CAD+ were similar in both groups (Student's t tests for independent samples). Therefore, we assumed that the questionnaire group was representative of the entire study population so far as lipids, apolipoproteins, and CAD were concerned.

Angiography
The CAD- group consisted of 129 women. The indications for angiography in the CAD- group were suspicion of CAD (81%) or preoperative screening for CAD in valvular disease (19%). All CAD- women only had vascular wall irregularities and stenosis <10%. The CAD+ group consisted of 160 women, and the indications for angiography in the CAD+ group were suspicion of CAD (98%) or preoperative screening for CAD in valvular disease (2%). The CAD+ group was further divided into 1-vessel (n=78), 2-vessel (n=41), and 3-vessel (n=32) disease groups. Nine women had a stenosis in the left main coronary artery.

Clinical and Lifestyle Characteristics
CAD+ women were significantly older than CAD- women. Non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was present in 24 women and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in 1 CAD+ woman. Both forms of diabetes were pooled for analysis (Table 1Down). Diabetes, smoking, and hypertension were significantly associated with CAD+ after correction for age. The body mass index was not different between CAD- (25.94±4.33 kg/m2) and CAD+ (26.24±4.04 kg/m2) women. Premature CAD, diagnosed as disease onset at <60 years of age, was present in 26.3% of CAD+ women. In the normolipidemic subgroup, defined as chol <6.5 mmol/L and TG <2.3 mmol/L, CAD was associated with age (P=0.008), but after correction for age, smoking was the only nonlipid risk factor that was significantly associated with CAD (P=0.03).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Age and Frequency Distribution of Clinical Characteristics in CAD- and CAD+ as Assessed by Angiography

Hormonal Status
The majority of the women (88.5%) were postmenopausal. The age at menopause was 49.17±4.3 years for women with a natural menopause (n=168) and 41.65±7.3 years for women with surgical menopause (n=23) (Table 1Up). After correction for age, postmenopausal status (natural or surgical) was no longer a predictor of CAD. Ever-use of HRT was associated with reduced CAD (P=0.012), but after correction for age, this was no longer significant (P=0.07). Only 12.4% of the postmenopausal women had ever used HRT in any form, and the mean duration of HRT was 3.2±4.0 years (range, 0.2 to 16). Twenty percent of the postmenopausal women had undergone hysterectomy.

Lipids and Apolipoproteins
Plasma chol concentrations in 5-year age categories of the entire study group were in the same range as chol concentrations in Dutch women from the general population (Tables 2Down, 3Down, and 4Down and Figure 1Down).15 16 Fasting plasma concentrations of chol, LDL-chol, TGs, and apoB were significantly higher and HDL-chol was significantly lower in CAD+ women than in CAD- women (Table 2Down), and this association remained so after correction for age. The extent of CAD, expressed as the number of stenotic coronary arteries, was associated with chol, LDL-chol, apoB, and age. After correction for age, apoB remained the most significant parameter (Table 3Down). In a normolipidemic subgroup (chol <=6.5 mmol/L and TGs <=2.3 mmol/L), apoB and LDL-chol were the only parameters associated with CAD after correction for age (Table 4Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Fasting Plasma Lipids and Lipoproteins in CAD- and CAD+ Women as Assessed by Angiography


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Fasting Lipids and Lipoproteins in Women With 1-, 2-, and 3-Vessel Disease on Coronary Angiograms


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Fasting Lipids and Apolipoproteins in Normolipidemic1 CAD- and CAD+ Women as Assessed by Angiography



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plasma concentrations of apoB (g/L) in the lowest quartiles of plasma chol (<5.9 mmol/L), LDL-chol (<3.8 mmol/L), and TGs (<1.3 mmol/L) and in the highest quartile of HDL-chol (>1.5 mmol/L) in women with (CAD+, black bar) and without (CAD-, white bar) angiographically established CAD. P values were calculated with Student's t tests for independent samples.

Each lipid parameter was an independent risk factor for CAD (logistic regression). After correction for confounders in clinical and lifestyle characteristics, the odds ratios for CAD were 11.1 for apoB (g/L), 1.5 for chol (mmol/L), 1.66 for LDL-chol (mmol/L), 0.68 for HDL-chol (mmol/L), and 5.1 for log TGs (log scale). Owing to differences in the units of measure, odds ratios cannot be directly compared. Therefore, lipid and apolipoprotein parameters were divided into quartiles. In any quartile of apoB, no significant differences between CAD- and CAD+ women were observed for chol, LDL-chol, HDL-chol, or TG. In contrast, apoB was significantly higher in CAD+ than in CAD- women in the lowest quartiles of chol, LDL-chol, and log TG, and there was a trend toward higher apoB levels in CAD+ versus CAD- in the highest HDL-chol quartile (Figure 1Up). In addition, apoB was significantly higher in CAD+ versus CAD- in the second and fourth log TG quartiles, in the fourth LDL-chol quartile, in the fourth chol quartile, and in the second HDL-chol quartile (data not shown).

Frequency distributions of chol and apoB in CAD+ and CAD- women are shown in Figures 2Down and 3Down. Of the CAD+ women, 68.7% had an elevated apoB concentration (>1.3 g/L). Of the CAD- women, 55.8% had a normal apoB concentration (<=1.3 g/L). In the CAD+ group, chol concentration exceeded 6.5 mmol/l in 65%, an LDL-chol concentration >3.5 mmol/L was present in 90%, and LDL-chol concentrations were >2.5 mmol/L in 99% of the women. ApoB (P=0.0003), chol (P<0.001), and LDL-chol (P=0.0003) showed a linear increase with age expressed in 5-year intervals.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Frequency distributions of plasma chol concentrations in women with (CAD+, black bar) and without (CAD-, white bar) angiographically established CAD.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Frequency distributions of plasma apoB concentrations in women with (CAD+, black bar) and without (CAD-, white bar) angiographically established CAD.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
In the current study we report the association between plasma apoB concentrations and CAD in women from the general population who were referred for angiography. Chol, LDL-chol, HDL-chol, TGs, and apoB were independent risk factors for CAD in women after correction for nonlipid risk factors. ApoA-I was not related to CAD. ApoB was superior to the "traditional lipids" chol, LDL-chol, HDL-chol, and TG in predicting the presence or absence of CAD. In the lowest quartiles of chol, LDL-chol, and TG, CAD+ women still had higher apoB concentrations than CAD- women. In the highest HDL-chol quartile, apoB concentrations were higher in CAD+ compared with CAD- women, but this association only approached (P=0.07) significance. In contrast, chol, LDL-chol, TGs, or HDL-chol gave no additional information for any apoB quartile. ApoB was also associated with the extent of CAD, expressed as the number of vessels involved, which has recently been reported to predict cardiovascular mortality.17

The role of apoB as an important risk factor is biologically plausible,18 19 since plasma apoB concentrations reflect the number of atherogenic lipoprotein particles.20 The atherogenic lipoproteins are LDL, containing predominantly chol, VLDL remnants (IDL), and chylomicron remnants, which contain both chol and TGs. LDL and remnant particles each contain 1 molecule of apoB as the structural protein, whereas the amount of chol and TGs per particle varies, and with it, the atherogenicity of the particle. Large, TG-rich VLDL particles are not considered atherogenic,21 whereas smaller remnants of TG-rich lipoprotein particles are atherogenic.22 Small, dense LDL particles are more atherogenic than are LDL particles of normal composition.23 Increased small, dense LDL concentrations are reflected by a more pronounced elevation of LDL apoB than of LDL-chol, and this trend is often accompanied by elevated plasma TG concentrations. Chol is a constituent of both atherogenic, apoB-containing lipoproteins and antiatherogenic, apoA-containing lipoproteins. This heterogeneity of lipoprotein particle composition can explain the superiority of apoB over chol and TG as a CAD risk factor.

Prospective population-based studies have designated HDL-chol as the most powerful lipid risk factor in women,4 5 24 25 26 but in these studies apoB was not determined. Cross-sectional analysis of the Framingham Offspring population showed that apoB concentrations were related to CAD in women.27 Data on apoB as a risk factor for CAD in the general population will also become available from a prospective, population-based observational study, including a large number of US women.28

Although apoB was the best discriminant between CAD- and CAD+ in the current study, there was still considerable overlap in apoB between CAD- and CAD+. Other studies have shown that the predictive power of apoB can be increased by separation of the plasma into different apoB-containing lipoprotein fractions. The fasting remnant, or IDL fraction, was superior to the LDL fraction in predicting the presence8 or severity29 of CAD in women with premature CAD. Postprandial chylomicron remnant concentrations were higher in CAD+ than in CAD- women while LDL apoB was similar.12 IDL-chol was also related to the progression of CAD in a combined group of men and women (n=63) with premature CAD,30 and IDL mass was related to the progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness in a study in men and women (n=24) combined.31 Early data from Framingham showed that in women, and in particular in postmenopausal women, remnant chol was related to CAD.32 Thus, in women, parameters for remnant particles are potentially better CAD risk indicators than is plasma apoB.

A limitation of the current study is the selection of women for angiography. Although only women who were undergoing their first angiography were included and women on lipid-lowering medication were excluded, the women who were suspected of having CAD could have changed their lifestyle. The CAD- women, who were referred for angiography because of suspected CAD, were likely to have more risk factors compared with CAD- women from the general population. These considerations would more likely underestimate than overestimate the strength of apoB as a risk factor. Still, the findings from the current study can be applied to women who are referred for angiography but cannot be extrapolated directly to the general population.

Currently, guidelines for CAD prevention are focussed on LDL-chol, although in women, LDL-chol is not a very powerful CAD risk factor.4 For secondary prevention, the target level for LDL-chol is <=2.6 mmol/L, and lipid-lowering therapy should be initiated if LDL-chol is >=3.4 mmol/L.33 34 In the current study, 99% of CAD+ women had an LDL-chol concentration >2.6 mmol/L. Ninety percent of CAD+ women had an LDL-chol concentration >=3.4 mmol/L, and therefore, had an indication for lipid-lowering interventions. A generally accepted apoB target level for prevention of cardiovascular disease may be defined in the future.

Hormonal Status
CAD is a disease of postmenopausal women.6 35 In the current study 95% of the CAD+ women were postmenopausal. Estrogen deficiency has been reported to be an independent risk factor for CAD assessed by angiography.36 In the current study, menopause was no longer a CAD risk factor after correction for age. This was probably due to the relatively small number of premenopausal women. Therefore, another measure of exposure to endogenous estrogens was used: the age at menopause. Recently it has been reported that the age at menopause is inversely associated with cardiovascular mortality.37 This association was not found in the Nurses' Health Study,38 in which the population was rather young. In the current study the age at menopause was not associated with CAD after correction for age. These findings suggest that age is a more important factor than endogenous estrogens. Another explanation could be that the current study group is different from the general population. In addition, endogenous estrogens are potentially related to CAD through mechanisms that are not detectable on angiography, such as vascular wall reactivity.39 40 41 42 This would imply that angiography studies are not an appropriate tool to evaluate the effect of estrogens. Nevertheless, the effect of HRT on angiographically defined CAD has repeatedly been demonstrated43 44 45 46 and even linked to survival.17 In the current study, few women ever used HRT, and the mean duration of HRT was short.

Nonlipid Risk Factors
Smoking emerged as a stronger risk factor than hypertension and diabetes. This also applied to the normolipidemic subgroup of women. Cessation of smoking has been reported to reduce CAD risk by 50% to 80% in observational studies.47

In conclusion, in this community-based angiography study in women, plasma concentrations of apoB, reflecting the number of atherogenic lipoproteins, was the best lipoprotein or lipid discriminant between CAD- and CAD+. The majority of CAD+ women had an LDL >2.5 mmol/L, the target level for secondary prevention. The majority of the CAD+ women were also postmenopausal, and HRT has been associated with protection against CAD.48 It remains to be determined which intervention, lipid lowering per se, HRT (also known to reduce apoB49 50 51 ), or a combination of both will be the best strategy.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
CAD+, CAD- = with, without coronary artery disease
chol = cholesterol
HRT = hormone replacement therapy
TG = triglyceride


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Forward Logistic Regression Analysis of Lipids, Apolipoproteins, and Nonlipid Risk Factors


*    Appendix 1
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Appendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
The parameters in the current study were also analyzed in a forward logistic regression model. The forward logistic regression model designated apoB as the most powerful discriminative factor between CAD+ and CAD-, as shown in Table 5Up. The interrelation between the different lipid and apolipoprotein variables and differences in the units of measure, ie, a logarithmic scale for TGs, millimoles per liter for chol, and grams per liter for apolipoproteins, make interpretation of this analysis less straightforward. A second-best parameter that is very close to the first and almost equal in discriminating potential as the first can be completely lost in a forward logistic model. We therefore chose not to report the data from the logistic regression analysis in our article but instead divided the lipid and apolipoprotein parameters into quartiles and analyzed differences in the other lipid parameters for any given quartile. Nevertheless, both ways of analysis show consistent results and depict apoB as the strongest factor associated with CAD.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors wish to thank Dr Ir. J.A.J. Faber for statistical advise and E. Bouwens for secretarial help.

Received October 6, 1997; accepted January 28, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowAppendix 1
*References
 

  1. Rader DJ, Hoeg JM, Brewer HB Jr. Quantitation of plasma apolipoproteins in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease [see comments]. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:1012–1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lamarche B, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Cantin B, Bernard PM, Dagenais GR, Despres JP. Apolipoprotein A-I and B levels and the risk of ischemic heart disease during a 5-year follow-up of men in the Quebec Cardiovascular Study. Circulation. 1996;94:273–278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease: ten-year follow-up from the Nurses' Health Study [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:756–762.[Abstract]
  4. Bass KM, Newschaffer CJ, Klag MJ, Bush TL. Plasma lipoprotein levels as predictors of cardiovascular death in women. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2209–2216.[Abstract]
  5. Kannel WB. Metabolic risk factors for coronary heart disease in women: perspective from the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1987;114:413–419.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics. Mortality by Main Causes of Death 1985–1995. In: SDU Publishers, ed. Gravenhage, Netherlands: SDU Publishers; 1996:146.
  7. Bahl VK, Vaswani M, Thatai D, Wasir HS. Plasma levels of apolipoproteins A-1 and B in Indian patients with angiographically defined coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 1994;46:143–149.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Kwiterovich PO Jr, Coresh J, Smith HH, Bachorik PS, Derby CA, Pearson TA. Comparison of the plasma levels of apolipoproteins B and A-1 and other risk factors in men and women with premature coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1015–1021.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Reinhart RA, Gani K, Arndt MR, Broste SK. Apolipoproteins A-I and B as predictors of angiographically defined coronary artery disease [see comments]. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1629–1633.[Abstract]
  10. de Bruin TW, Brouwer CB, Gimpel JA, Erkelens DW. Postprandial decrease in HDL cholesterol and HDL apo A-I in normal subjects in relation to triglyceride metabolism. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:E492–E498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cohn JS, McNamara JR, Cohn SD, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ. Postprandial plasma lipoprotein changes in human subjects of different ages. J Lipid Res. 1988;29:469–479.[Abstract]
  12. Meyer E, Westerveld HT, de Ruyter Meijstek FC, van Greevenbroek MM, Rienks R, van Rijn NJ, Erkelens DW, de Bruin TW. Abnormal postprandial apolipoprotein B-48 and triglyceride responses in normolipidemic women with greater than 70% stenotic coronary artery disease: a case-control study. Atherosclerosis. 1996;124:221–235.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Westerveld HT, Meijer E, Erkelens DW, de Bruin TW. Postprandial reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in postmenopausal women: improvement by 17ß-estradiol. Metabolism. 1996;45:827–832.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Judkins MP. Selective coronary arteriography, I: a percutaneous transfemoral technic. Radiology. 1967;89:815–824.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Mennen LI, Witteman JC, Geleijnse JM, Stolk RP, Visser MC, Grobbee DE. Risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in the elderly: the ERGO study (Erasmus Rotterdam Health and the Elderly). Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995;139:1983–1988.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Verschuren WMM, van Leer EM, Blokstra A, Seidel YC, Smit HA, Bueno de Mesquita HB, Obermann-de Boer GL, Kromhout D. Cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Netherlands. Neth J Cardiol. 1993;4:205–210.
  17. Sullivan JM, El Zeky F, Vander Zwaag R, Ramanathan KB. Effect on survival of estrogen replacement therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:847–850.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Williams KJ, Tabas I. The response-to-retention hypothesis of early atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:551–561.[Free Full Text]
  19. Hurt-Camejo E, Olsson U, Wiklund O, Bondjers G, Camejo G. Cellular consequences of the association of apoB lipoproteins with proteoglycans: potential contribution to atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:1011–1017.[Free Full Text]
  20. Sniderman AD, Pedersen T, Kjekshus J. Putting low-density lipoproteins at center stage in atherogenesis. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:64–67.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Walsh BW, Schiff I, Rosner B, Greenberg L, Ravnikar V, Sacks FM. Effects of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1196–1204.[Abstract]
  22. Slyper AH. A fresh look at the atherogenic remnant hypothesis. Lancet. 1992;340:289–291.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Austin MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Willett WC, Krauss RM. Low-density lipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1988;260:1917–1921.[Abstract]
  24. Brunner D, Weisbort J, Meshulam N, Schwartz S, Gross J, Saltz-Rennert H, Altman S, Loebl K. Relation of serum total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol percentage to the incidence of definite coronary events: twenty-year follow-up of the Donolo-Tel Aviv Prospective Coronary Artery Disease Study. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:1271–1276.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Livshits G, Weisbort J, Meshulam N, Brunner D. Multivariate analysis of the twenty-year follow-up of the Donolo-Tel Aviv Prospective Coronary Artery Disease Study and the usefulness of high density lipoprotein cholesterol percentage. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:676–681.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Barrett Connor E, Bush TL. Estrogen and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA. 1991;265:1861–1867.[Abstract]
  27. Schaefer EJ, Lamon-Fava S, Cohn SD, Schaefer MM, Ordovas JM, Castelli WP, Wilson PWF. Effects of age, gender, and menopausal status on plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels in the Framingham Offspring Study. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:779–792.[Abstract]
  28. Brown SA, Hutchinson R, Morrisett J, Boerwinkle E, Davis CE, Gotto AM Jr, Patsch W. Plasma lipid, lipoprotein cholesterol, and apoprotein distributions in selected US communities: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:1139–1158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Reardon MF, Nestel PJ, Craig IH, Harper RW. Lipoprotein predictors of the severity of coronary artery disease in men and women. Circulation. 1985;71:881–888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Phillips NR, Waters D, Havel RJ. Plasma lipoproteins and progression of coronary artery disease evaluated by angiography and clinical events. Circulation. 1993;88:2762–2770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Dunn M, Liu C, Selzer RH, Krauss RM. Intermediate-density lipoproteins and progression of carotid arterial wall intima-media thickness. Circulation. 1997;95:2022–2026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Gordon T, McNamara PM. Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins, and the risk of coronary heart disease: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med. 1971;74:1–12.
  33. National Cholesterol Education Program. Second report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel II). Circulation. 1994;89:1333–1445.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Grundy SM, Balady GJ, Criqui MH, Fletcher G, Greenland P, Hiratzka LF, Houston-Miller N, Kris-Etherton P, Krumholz HM, LaRosa J, Ockene IS, Pearson TA, Reed J, Smith SC Jr, Washington R. When to start cholesterol-lowering therapy in patients with coronary heart disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Task Force on Risk Reduction. Circulation. 1997;95:1683–1685.[Free Full Text]
  35. Kannel WB, Wilson PW. Risk factors that attenuate the female coronary disease advantage. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:57–61.[Abstract]
  36. Morise AP, Dalal JN, Duval RD. Value of a simple measure of estrogen status for improving the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. Am J Med. 1993;94:491–496.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. van der Schouw YT, van der Graaf Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans JC, Banga JD. Age at menopause as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Lancet. 1996;347:714–718.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1105–1110.[Abstract]
  39. Williams JK, Shively CA, Clarkson TB. Determinants of coronary artery reactivity in premenopausal female cynomolgus monkeys with diet-induced atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1994;90:983–987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Rosano GM, Sarrel PM, Poole-Wilson PA, Collins P. Beneficial effect of oestrogen on exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia in women with coronary artery disease. Lancet. 1993;342:133–136.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Gilligan DM, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO. Effects of physiological levels of estrogen on coronary vasomotor function in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;89:2545–2551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Collins P, Rosano GM, Sarrel PM, Ulrich L, Adamopoulos S, Beal CM, McNeil SG, Poole-Wilson PA. 17ß-Estradiol attenuates acetylcholine-induced coronary arterial constriction in women but not men with coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1995;92:24–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Sullivan JM, Vander Zwaag R, Lemp GF, Hughes JP, Maddock V, Kroetz FW, Ramanathan KB, Mervis DM. Postmenopausal estrogen use and coronary atherosclerosis. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:358–363.
  44. McFarland KF, Boniface ME, Hornung CA, Earnhardt W, Humphries JO. Risk factors and noncontraceptive estrogen use in women with and without coronary disease. Am Heart J. 1989;117:1209–1214.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Hong MK, Romm PA, Reagan K, Green CE, Rackley CE. Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on serum lipid values and angiographically defined coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:176–178.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Gruchow HW, Anderson AJ, Barboriak JJ, Sobocinski KA. Postmenopausal use of estrogen and occlusion of coronary arteries. Am Heart J. 1988;115:954–963.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Rich Edwards JW, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Buring JE. The primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1758–1766.[Free Full Text]
  48. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA. Estrogen replacement therapy and coronary heart disease: a quantitative assessment of the epidemiologic evidence. Prev Med. 1991;20:47–63.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Haines CJ, Chung TK, Masarei JR, Tomlinson B, Lau JT. An examination of the effect of combined cyclical hormone replacement therapy on lipoprotein(a) and other lipoproteins. Atherosclerosis. 1996;119:215–222.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Wakatsuki A, Sagara Y. Effects of continuous medroxyprogesterone acetate on lipoprotein metabolism in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen. Maturitas. 1996;25:35–44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Nabulsi AA, Folsom AR, White A, Patsch W, Heiss G, Wu KK, Szklo M. Association of hormone-replacement therapy with various cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Investigators [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1069–1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. M. Ballantyne, J. S. Raichlen, and V. A. Cain
Statin Therapy Alters the Relationship Between Apolipoprotein B and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets in High-Risk Patients: The MERCURY II (Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin therapY II) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 19, 2008; 52(8): 626 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Meisinger, H. Loewel, W. Mraz, and W. Koenig
Prognostic value of apolipoprotein B and A-I in the prediction of myocardial infarction in middle-aged men and women: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2005; 26(3): 271 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Frohlich and M. Dobiasova
Fractional Esterification Rate of Cholesterol and Ratio of Triglycerides to HDL-Cholesterol Are Powerful Predictors of Positive Findings on Coronary Angiography
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2003; 49(11): 1873 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. J. Gibbons, J. Abrams, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley, P. C. Deedwania, J. S. Douglas, T. B. Ferguson Jr, S. D. Fihn, T. D. Fraker Jr, J. M. Gardin, et al.
ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)
Circulation, January 7, 2003; 107(1): 149 - 158.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Committee Members, R. J. Gibbons, J. Abrams, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley, P. C. Deedwania, J. S. Douglas, T. B. Ferguson Jr, S. D. Fihn, T. D. Fraker Jr, et al.
ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 159 - 168.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
References
Circulation, December 17, 2002; 106(25): 3373 - 3421.
[Full Text]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. E Roeters van Lennep, H.T. Westerveld, D.W. Erkelens, and E. E van der Wall
Risk factors for coronary heart disease: implications of gender
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 538 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
E. T.P. Keulen, M. Kruijshoop, N. C. Schaper, A. P.G. Hoeks, and T. W.A. de Bruin
Increased Intima-Media Thickness in Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia Associated With Apolipoprotein B
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2002; 22(2): 283 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. E. R. van Lennep, H. T. Westerveld, H. W. O. R. van Lennep, A. H. Zwinderman, D. W. Erkelens, and E. E. van der Wall
Apolipoprotein Concentrations During Treatment and Recurrent Coronary Artery Disease Events
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(11): 2408 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. M. Wagner, J. L. Sanchez-Quesada, A. Perez, M. Rigla, M. Cortes, F. Blanco-Vaca, and J. Ordonez-Llanos
Inaccuracy of Calculated LDL-Cholesterol in Type 2 Diabetes: Consequences for Patient Risk Classification and Therapeutic Decisions
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2000; 46(11): 1830 - 1832.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J.E Roeters van Lennep, A.H Zwinderman, H.W.O Roeters van Lennep, H.E Westerveld, H.W.M Plokker, A.A Voors, A.V.G Bruschke, and E.E van der Wall
Gender differences in diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease from 1981 to 1997. No evidence for the Yentl syndrome
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2000; 21(11): 911 - 918.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. J. Moss, R. E. Goldstein, V. J. Marder, C. E. Sparks, D. Oakes, H. Greenberg, H. J. Weiss, W. Zareba, M. W. Brown, C.-S. Liang, et al.
Thrombogenic Factors and Recurrent Coronary Events
Circulation, May 18, 1999; 99(19): 2517 - 2522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westerveld, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Erkelens, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westerveld, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Erkelens, D. W.