(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1998;18:902-907.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Norethindrone Acetate Enhances the Antiatherogenic Effect of 17ß-Estradiol
A Secondary Prevention Study of Aortic Atherosclerosis in Ovariectomized Cholesterol-Fed Rabbits
Peter Alexandersen;
Jens Haarbo;
Irene Sandholdt;
Michael Shalmi;
Henrik Lawaetz;
; Claus Christiansen
From the Center for Clinical & Basic Research, Ballerup (P.A., J.H.,
I.S., H.L., C.C.); and Novo Nordisk A/S, Clinical Department, Gynecological
Pharmaceuticals, Bagsvaerd (M.S.), Denmark.
Correspondence to Peter Alexandersen, MD, Center for Clinical & Basic Research, Ballerup Byvej 222, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
AbstractThe influence of
progestogens in combination with 17ß-estradiol (E2) on
cardiovascular disease remains controversial. This
study investigated the effect of norethindrone acetate (NETA) combined
with E2 on aortic atherosclerosis. Eighty mature female
rabbits were ovariectomized, then fed a cholesterol-rich
diet (240 mg/d) for 14 weeks to induce aortic
atherosclerosis. They were randomized to four equally
large groups for the following 38-week intervention period. One group
received placebo, another group oral E2 4 mg daily (E2), and the last
two groups oral E2 4 mg daily combined with either NETA 1 mg (E2NETA1)
or NETA 3 mg (E2NETA3). The cholesterol intake was reduced
to a "maintenance" level of 80 mg/d during the intervention
period. Total serum cholesterol and
ultracentrifuged lipoproteins were analyzed
enzymatically throughout the study. The cholesterol content
in the aortic wall was 2.76±0.44 µmol/cm2
(mean±SEM) in the E2NETA1 group, 1.77±0.37
µmol/cm2 in the E2NETA3 group, 5.46±0.77
µmol/cm2 in the E2 group, and 7.20±0.94
µmol/cm2 in the placebo group (ANOVA
P<0.0001). The difference (in the aortic
cholesterol accumulation) between the E2 and each of the
combined E2/NETA groups was statistically significant
(P<0.01) but could only partly be explained by the
differences in serum lipids and lipoproteins. In conclusion, NETA
enhances the antiatherogenic effect of E2 in
cholesterol-fed rabbits. This effect is only partially
mediated through changes in serum lipids and lipoproteins.
Key Words: atherosclerosis prevention rabbits estradiol NETA
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Cardiovascular
disease continues to be the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in
postmenopausal women in the Western World.1
Several epidemiological and clinical studies indicate that menopause is
associated with a considerable increase in CVD but that postmenopausal
estrogen replacement therapy reduces the incidence of CVD by at least
50%.1 2 3 However, estrogen monotherapy increases
the risk of endometrial cancer,4 and therefore
progestogens are usually added to reduce this
risk.5 The influence of progestogens in
combination with estrogen on CVD is highly controversial: some authors
believe that progestogens negate the beneficial antiatherogenic effect
of estrogens.6 This belief primarily rests on the
negative influence exerted by progestogens on serum lipids, especially
HDL cholesterol.6 7 This
parameter is, however, known to be only one of several
antiatherogenic mediators of estrogens. Some clinical data indicate, on
the other hand, that NETA, a 19-nortestosterone derivative, may itself
possess a beneficial effect on serum total cholesterol and
LDL cholesterol in postmenopausal
women.8 Accordingly, NETA may also enhance some
of the beneficial effects of estrogens in terms of CVD. To investigate
further the role of NETA, continuously combined with 17ß-estradiol
(E2), on established atherosclerosis, we used the
rabbit model, which has previously been found useful in
atherosclerosis research.9
 |
Methods
|
|---|
Study Design
Eighty sexually mature female rabbits of the Danish Country
strain (SSC:CPH) were obtained from Statens Serum Institute,
Copenhagen, Denmark. They were individually housed at room temperature
(20±2°C), 55±5% relative humidity, with a 12-hour light cycle. The
study was conducted in new facilities (approved by the Animal
Experiments' Inspectorate, Denmark) at the Center for Clinical & Basic
Research, Ledoeje, Denmark. After a 4-week period of acclimatization,
the animals underwent bilateral ovariectomy (weeks 5 to 6). The rabbits
were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection of Hypnorm
0.3 mL/kg (0.2 mg/mL fentanyl+10 mg/mL fluanizon, Janssen-Cilag
Ltd).10 Before arrival at the Center and up to
the time of surgery, the rabbits were fed a standard commercial rabbit
chow. Postoperatively, all animals were fed a diet containing 240 mg of
cholesterol per day for the next 14 weeks (weeks 7 through
20) to induce aortic atherosclerosis. The rabbits were
then randomly assigned to one of the following four oral treatment
groups: placebo (n=20), 4 mg of E2 daily (E2, n=20), or two groups
receiving 4 mg of E2 continuously combined with either NETA 1 mg
(E2NETA1, n=19) or NETA 3 mg (E2NETA3, n=20). During this 38-week
intervention period (weeks 21 to 59), the cholesterol
content in the chow was reduced to a "maintenance level" of
80 mg per day. The study was approved by the Animal Experiments'
Inspectorate, Denmark. All procedues complied with the Danish
guidelines for experimental animal studies.
Rabbit Chow
Each rabbit was fed 100 g of chow per day throughout the
entire study. The chow was prepared by first dissolving the E2,
E2+low-dose NETA, or E2+high-dose NETA (NovoNordisk A/S), in ethanol
(96%; 0.50 mL per animal per day), then mixing with maize oil
(Unikem). Another mixture was prepared by dissolving
cholesterol (SIGC-8503, Bie & Berntsen A/S) in maize oil by
slow heating. The two solutions containing maize oil (total daily
intake of maize oil was 8 mL per animal) were then mixed manually
together with the pellets (Altromin 2123, Brogaarden). For the placebo
group, the chow was prepared as described; however, no hormone was
added. For logistic reasons, the chow for a period of 5 weeks was
produced, labeled, and stored at -20°C in daily portions. Food
consumption was monitored by weighing any remaining chow each week. All
animals had free access to water.
Blood Samples
Blood samples were taken in weeks 4, 13, 19, 25, 32, 40, 48, and
55, and always after a 24-hour fast.
Serum Lipids and Lipoproteins
Total serum cholesterol and
triglycerides were measured enzymatically by means of
kinetic colorimetric methods (Cobas Mira). To determine
serum lipoproteins (HDL, density
1.063 g/mL; LDL, 1.019 g/mL
density
<1.063 g/mL; IDL, 1.006 g/mL
density <1.019 g/mL; VLDL, density
<1.006 g/mL), three aliquots from the serum samples were adjusted to
specific densities, using solutions of NaCl and NaBr. The aliquots were
then sealed and ultracentrifuged at 4°C at
1.58x108 g/min for 14.5 hours in a Beckman
50.4 Ti rotor (Beckman Instruments, Inc). The top and bottom fractions
of each aliquot were divided by tube slicing, and the
cholesterol levels of the fractions were then measured
enzymatically. The lipoproteins were calculated from the fractions
after correction for recovery and dilution.
Serum E2
Serum levels of E2 were measured in weeks 4 and 55 by
radioimmunoassay, with an intra-assay imprecision of 8.5%, an
interassay imprecision of 12.3%, and a detection limit of 0.010
nmol/L.11
Aortic Cholesterol Content
At the end of the study (week 59), the rabbits were killed with
an intravenous injection of 1 to 2 mL of mebumal
(pentobarbital) 20% solution. The thoracic aorta (just above the
aortic valves to the level of the diaphragm) was dissected free, and
the connective tissue adhering to the adventitia was then carefully
removed under running saline. The aorta was cut longitudinally and the
luminal surface rinsed with saline. The vessel was fixed at the corners
with pins onto a piece of paper on a cork board. The aortic surface
area was determined and the tissue was separated in two parts (a
proximal and a distal part) at the level of the first intercostal
arteries. The proximal part was used to strip the luminal layer
containing the intima and part of the media from the underlying
media/adventitia. The proximal part was weighed and stored at -20°C
until analyzed.
For analysis, the luminal layer of the aortic tissue was minced
and the lipids were extracted chemically with chloroform and methanol
(2:1, vol/vol) over 24 hours. The lipids were separated from the
proteins.12 The total aortic
cholesterol content in the tissue specimens was measured
enzymatically after the fraction containing cholesterol had
been taken to dryness by heating and then dissolved in 1.0 mL of
2-propanol. The amount of protein in the aorta was measured as
described by Lowry et al.13 The weight of the
heart was recorded.
The Uterus
The bicorn uterus was cut at the level of the vagina and
beginning of the salpinges, respectively, removed, and the weight was
determined.
Body Weight
Body weight was determined every 4 weeks throughout the study on
the same scales.
Statistical Analysis
The average levels of serum cholesterol and
lipoproteins during the treatment period were calculated as the area
under the curve divided by the length of the intervention period (38
weeks). ANOVA was performed for the baseline values (Table
1), the average serum lipids and lipoprotein levels, aortic
cholesterol content, and uterine weight. If ANOVA indicated
statistical significance, a t test was used to compare
groups two by two using the Bonferroni correction for multiple
comparisons. The relation between aortic accumulation of
cholesterol and the averaged serum total
cholesterol (and lipoprotein) level was determined by
correlation analysis. The influence of baseline total serum
cholesterol and triglyceride levels, average
serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and
lipoprotein levels, and treatment (the independent variables) on
aortic cholesterol accumulation (the dependent
variable) was adjusted by ANCOVA. All statistical analyses
were performed with the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) with
5% as the level of significance.14
 |
Results
|
|---|
The baseline values for the four treatment groups are given in
Table 1
. The baseline body weight of the E2NETA3 group was lower than
that of the other groups, despite randomization. Body weights were
largely unchanged in all the groups throughout the study, although the
E2NETA3 group tended to increase in weight, thereby eliminating the
small initial difference. Five rabbits died prematurely: one in the
placebo group (week 50) for unknown reasons; one in the estrogen group
(week 42) because of intestinal obstruction; two in the E2NETA1 group:
one (week 12) probably because of pericholangitis and one (week 48)
after a limb trauma; and one in the E2NETA3 group (week 34) because of
postoperative hernia. Thus, 93.8% completed the study.
Figure 1
shows the changes in total serum
cholesterol during the study. Serum values peaked in week
19, ie, at the end of the atherosclerosis-induction
period. Table 2
shows the average serum total
cholesterol and lipoprotein levels during the treatment
period. For the two estradiol/NETA groups, the averaged total serum
cholesterol, triglycerides, IDL
cholesterol, and VLDL cholesterol values were
lower than those for the placebo and estradiol groups (ANOVA
P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference
in these parameters between the two estradiol/NETA groups
or between the placebo and the estradiol group. Serum estradiol was low
and remained unchanged in the placebo group (0.17±0.04 versus
0.12±0.03 nmol/L, baseline versus week 55; mean±SEM) but increased
significantly in the E2 group (from 0.10±0.01 to 0.21±0.04 nmol/L,
P=0.02) and the estradiol/NETA groups (E2NETA1, from
0.11±0.01 to 0.22±0.03 nmol/L, and E2NETA3, from 0.08±0.01 to
0.16±0.03 nmol/L, P<0.01 for both). The uterine weight in
the placebo group was 6.2±0.7 g (mean±SEM) and was significantly and
equally higher in both estradiol/NETA groups (17.5±1.4 g for E2NETA1
and 19.6±2.1 g for E2NETA3), although lower than in the E2 group
(28.3±1.8 g) (ANOVA P<0.0001). Thus, an increase in the
NETA dose does not apparently add further to the reduction in uterine
weight.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Changes in the total serum levels of
cholesterol during the study for the four treatment groups.
The levels were reduced more in the estradiol/NETA groups than in the
placebo and estradiol groups (ANOVA P<0.05). Values are
mean±SEM.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2. Average Daily Serum Total Cholesterol,
Triglycerides, and Lipoprotein Levels During the Treatment Period1
(mean±SEM)
|
|
Figure 2
visualizes the accumulation of
cholesterol in the luminal proximal layer of the thoracic
aorta for the four groups, unadjusted (A), adjusted for the
corresponding aortic protein content (B), adjusted for aortic wet
weight (C), or adjusted for the aortic area (D). The differences in
aortic cholesterol accumulation were highly statistically
significant (ANOVA P<0.0001). When adjusted for the aortic
area, the estrogen group had accumulated 75.7% of that found in the
placebo group, and this was significantly more (P<0.01)
than in the E2NETA1 and E2NETA3 groups, which had accumulated
respectively only 38.2% and 24.6% of the aortic
cholesterol in the placebo group. Aortic accumulation of
cholesterol was significantly related to the averaged serum
total cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, IDL
cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol
(.54
r
0.71, P<0.0001 for these correlations)
but not to HDL cholesterol (r=-0.05). ANCOVA
was performed, with the aortic cholesterol content as the
dependent variable and baseline and average total serum
cholesterol, triglyceride, and lipoprotein
levels, and treatment as covariates. This analysis showed
that only treatment, LDL cholesterol, and VLDL
cholesterol were significant (respectively,
P=0.006, P=0.045, and P=0.011)
independent predictors of aortic
atherosclerosis. Compared with placebo, the estimates
(mean±SEM) were as follows: with E2NETA1:-3.02±0.95
µmol/cm-2 (P<0.01); with E2NETA3:
-2.90±0.97 µmol/cm-2
(P<0.01); with E2: -0.56±0.97
µmol/cm-2 (NS); and for LDL
cholesterol: 0.46±0.22
µmol/cm-2 (P<0.05) and VLDL
cholesterol: 0.24±0.09
µmol/cm-2 (P<0.05). The amount of
aortic cholesterol accumulation after correction for LDL
cholesterol and VLDL cholesterol is depicted in
Figure 3
. In addition, each of the two
E2/NETA groups had statistically significantly less aortic
cholesterol accumulation than the E2 group
(P<0.01 for both comparisons). Comparison of the two
E2/NETA groups showed that the aortic cholesterol
accumulation (when adjusted for aortic protein or surface area) tended
to be lower in the high-dose NETA group than in the low-dose NETA group
(P<0.1) (Figure 2
). However, after correction for
lipoproteins, the cholesterol content in the two groups was
similar, which indicates a lipid-mediated, dose-response effect (Figure 3
).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Accumulation of cholesterol in the
proximal thoracic aorta, unadjusted (µmol; A), adjusted for aortic
protein (nmol/mg; B), adjusted for tissue wet weight (nmol/mg; C), and
adjusted for the area surface (µmol/cm2; D). Values are
mean±SEM. *P<0.05; **P<0.01;
***P<0.001.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Accumulation of cholesterol in the
proximal aorta after adjustment for LDL cholesterol and
VLDL cholesterol (set at 4 mmol/L and 8 mmol/L,
respectively) according to the different treatment groups. Values are
mean±SEM.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The present study demonstrated that in rabbits, NETA 1 and 3
mg per day induce different effects according to the target tissue
studied. Thus, 1 mg of NETA and 3 mg of NETA daily were equally
efficacious in counteracting the uterotrophic effects of estradiol 4 mg
per day. In this study, the continuous treatment with NETA combined
with E2 had a significant additional preventive antiatherogenic effect
compared with E2 alone. This additive or synergistic action of NETA in
reducing atherosclerosis was only partly explained by
lower levels of serum lipids and lipoproteins. Hence, a direct hormonal
effect on the arterial wall is indicated. Our results
suggest that at least some combined estrogen-progestogen replacement
therapies may have a nonlipid inhibitory effect on
established atherosclerosis, greater than that of E2
monotherapy. The beneficial progestogenic action may perhaps seem
somewhat surprising. However, with respect to serum lipids and
lipoproteins, previous human data indicate that when NETA is added to
estradiol treatment, it enhances the beneficial estrogenic changes in
serum levels of total and LDL cholesterol and
lipoprotein(a), which suggests that NETA has an additive
antiatherogenic influence.8 15 This does not seem
to be the case for other commonly used
progestogens.16 Furthermore, clinical studies
investigating other end points, such as postmenopausal bone mass, have
indicated that NETA possesses an intrinsic estrogenic
action.17 Whether this also applies to other
progestogens is not yet known. Data from a previous rabbit study have
suggested that aortic accumulation of cholesterol seems to
be inhibited significantly more by NETA than by
MPA.18 Such differences in the antiatherogenic
properties of different progestogens are supported by other
investigations. A recent study thus suggested that progesterone
injected in high doses completely eliminates the beneficial estrogenic
effect on aortic atherosclerosis in ovariectomized
cholesterol-fed rabbits.19 Studies of
ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys have demonstrated that progesterone
appears to have a neutral impact on the antiatherogenic effect of
E220 21 and that in combination with CEE, MPA may
even negate the favorable estrogenic effect as measured by the
endothelium-mediated dilatation of atherosclerotic
coronary arteries.22 Data from a recently
published study of ovariectomized monkeys fed an atherogenic diet and
treated with either CEE, MPA, CEE+MPA, or no hormones showed that
animals treated with MPA or CEE+MPA had similar extent of
atherosclerosis compared with the controls and that
animals in the CEE group had significantly less
atherosclerosis than any of these
groups.23 Whether these discrepancies are due to
differences between 19-nortestosterone and 17-hydroxyprogesterone
derivatives is at present unknown. Methodological differences, ie,
in the species/strain, study design, doses, or route of administration,
may also be important. It might, however, be suggested that there are
important fundamental differences in the ability of
17-hydroxyprogesterone and 19-nortestosterone derivatives to prevent
the atherosclerotic process.
The possible mechanism by which NETA could enhance one or more of the
beneficial estrogenic effects is, however, largely speculative. It has
been suggested that accumulation and/or metabolism of LDL
cholesterol in the arterial wall may be reduced
during E2 therapy,24 which, theoretically, could
be explained by a potent estrogenic antioxidant
capacity.25 Recent data suggest that metabolites
of NETA (3ß,5
-NETA and 3
,5
-NETA, respectively) may exert an
estrogenic (and perhaps an antioxidant) effect through binding to the
estrogen receptor.26 Indeed, some data indicate
that NETA in vivo is also metabolized to ethinyl estradiol, which in
turn exerts the estrogenic effect via the estrogen
receptor.27 In addition, the progestogenic effect
of NETA is mediated via interaction of NETA with the progesterone
receptor,27 whereas other studies in the rabbit
uterus have shown that MPA does not bind to the estrogen
receptor.28 In previous studies we found that
NETA alone29 and in combination with
E29 had a neutral effect on early atherogenic
processes. It may therefore be speculated that NETA primarily has a
synergistic beneficial effect together with estradiol in established
and more advanced atherogenic stages.
Two recent epidemiological studies investigated the role of estradiol
combined with progestogens on hard cardiovascular end
points. One study30 showed that postmenopausal
women treated with an estrogen/progestogen combination (predominantly a
19-nortestosterone derivative other than NETA, namely
levonorgestrel) tended to have fewer
cardiovascular events (ie, myocardial infarctions) than
women receiving E2 monotherapy, who in turn had fewer events than women
not taking hormone replacement therapy. Very recently, data from the
Nurses' Health Study31 indicated that the
current use of MPA combined with oral conjugated estrogens was
associated with markedly less risk of a major coronary heart
disease condition than when hormone replacement therapy was never used.
The relative risk was even lower than that of current estrogen use.
These risk estimates were, however, based on a very small number of
subjects.
If the estrogen-enhancing effect of NETA reported here is confirmed in
future studies, it will undoubtedly have a great impact on future
considerations regarding estrogen/progestogen therapy in the
(secondary) prevention of CVD in postmenopausal women.
 |
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
|
|---|
| CEE |
= |
conjugated equine estrogens |
| CVD |
= |
cardiovascular disease |
| E2 |
= |
17ß-estradiol |
| MPA |
= |
medroxyprogesterone acetate |
| NETA |
= |
norethindrone acetate |
|
Received September 26, 1997;
accepted December 8, 1997.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Bush TL, Fried LP, Barrett-Connor E.
Cholesterol, lipoproteins, and coronary heart
disease in women. Clin Chem. 1988;34:360370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner BS,
Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Menopause and the risk of
coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J
Med. 1987;316:11051110.[Abstract]
-
Sarrel PM. Ovarian hormones and the
circulation. Maturitas. 1990;12:287298.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Council Report. Estrogen replacement therapy in the
menopause. JAMA. 1983;249:359361.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Persson I, Adami HO, Bergkvist L, Lindgreen A,
Petterson B, Hoover R, Schairer C. Risk of endometrial cancer after
treatment with oestrogens alone or in conjunction with progestogens:
results of a prospective study. BMJ. 1989;298:147151.
-
Hirvonen E, Mälkönen M, Manninen V. Effect
of different progestogens on lipoproteins during postmenopausal
replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:560563.[Abstract]
-
Fåhraeus L, Larsson-Cohn U, Wallentin L.
L-Norgestrel and progesterone have different
influences on plasma lipoproteins. Eur J Clin Invest. 1983;13:447453.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jensen J, Riis BJ, Strøm V, Christiansen C. Long-term
and withdrawal effects of two different oestrogen-progestogen
combinations on lipid and lipoprotein profiles in post-menopausal
women. Maturitas. 1989;11:117128.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Haarbo J, Leth-Espensen P, Stender S, Christiansen C.
Estrogen monotherapy and combined estrogen-progestogen replacement
therapy attenuate aortic cholesterol in ovariectomized
cholesterol-fed rabbits. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:12741279.
-
Kaplan HM, Timmons EH. The Rabbit: A Model for
the Principles of Mammalian Physiology and Surgery. New York, NY:
Academic Press, Inc; 1979:127129.
-
Abraham GE, Manlimos FS, Garza R. Radioimmunoassay of
steroids. In: Abraham GE, ed. Handbook of Radioimmunoassay.
New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1977:591657.
-
Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GHS. A simple method for the
isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues.
J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497509.[Free Full Text]
-
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein
measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265275.[Free Full Text]
-
SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide,
Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1987.
-
Farish E, Rolton HA, Barnes JF, Hart DM. Lipoprotein
(a) concentrations in postmenopausal women taking norethisterone.
BMJ. 1991;303:694.
-
The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions
(PEPI) Trial Writing Group. Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin
regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women.
JAMA. 1995;273:199208.[Abstract]
-
Christiansen C, Riis BJ. 17ß-Estradiol and
continuous norethisterone: a unique treatment for established
osteoporosis in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;71:836841.[Abstract]
-
Spagnoli LG, Palmieri G, Mauriello A, Orlandi A,
Bancheri C, Pasetto. High-dose synthetic progestogens inhibit foam and
smooth muscle cell proliferation and atherosclerotic plaque formation
in aortas of rabbits fed a hypercholesterolemic diet.
Atherosclerosis. 1990;82:2736.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hanke H, Hanke S, Bruck B, Brehme U, Gugel N, Finking
G, Mück AO, Schmahl FW, Hombach V, Haasis R. Inhibition of
protective effect of estrogen by progesterone in experimental
atherosclerosis.
Atherosclerosis. 1996;121:129138.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Adams MR, Kaplan JR, Manuck SB, Koritnik DR, Parks JS,
Wolfe MS, Clarkson TB. Inhibition of coronary
atherosclerosis by 17-beta estradiol in ovariectomized
monkeys: lack of an effect of added progesterone.
Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:10511057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kushwaha RS, Lewis DS, Carey KD, McGill HC Jr. Effects
of estrogen and progesterone on plasma lipoproteins and experimental
atherosclerosis in the baboon (Papio sp.).
Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:2331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Williams JK, Honoré EK, Washburn SA, Clarkson TB.
Effects of hormone replacement therapy on reactivity of atherosclerotic
coronary arteries in cynomolgus monkeys. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1994;24:17571761.[Abstract]
-
Adams MR, Regster TC, Wagner JD, Williams JK.
Medroxyprogesterone acetate antagonizes
inhibitory effects of conjugated equine estrogens on
coronary artery atherosclerosis.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:217221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wagner JD, Clarkson TB, St Claire RW, Schwenke DC,
Shively CA, Adams MR. Estrogen and progesterone replacement therapy
reduces low density lipoprotein accumulation in the coronary
arteries of surgically postmenopausal cynomolgus monkeys. J
Clin Invest. 1991;88:19952002.
-
Sack MN, Rader DJ, Cannon RO III. Oestrogen and
inhibition of low-density lipoproteins in postmenopausal women.
Lancet. 1994;343:269270.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Oropeza MV, Campos MG, Lemus AE, Garcia G, Perez PG,
Monter HP. Estrogenic actions of norethisterone and its A-ring reduced
metabolites: induction of in vitro uterine sensitivity to
serotonin. Arch Med Res. 1994;25:307310.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Okada H. Metabolism, structure and
biological activity of sex steroids. Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai
Zasshi. 1993;69:6779.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Misao R, Nishigaki M, Hori M, Ichigo S, Fujimoto J,
Tamaya T. Effects of danazol and
medroxyprogesterone acetate on estrogen-(estradiol
and estriol) specific binding sites in rabbit uterus. Gynecol
Endocrinol. 1995;9:2935.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Haarbo J, Svendsen OL, Christiansen C. Progestogens do
not affect the aortic accumulation of cholesterol in
ovariectomized cholesterol-fed rabbits. Circ
Res. 1992;70:11981202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Falkeborn M, Persson I, Adami HO, Bergström R,
Eaker E, Mohsen HLR, Naessén T. The risk of acute myocardial
infarction after oestrogen and oestrogen-progestogen replacement.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:821828.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Colditz GA,
Willett WC, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen
and progestin use and the risk of cardiovascular
disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:453461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]