Original Contributions |
From INSERM unités 460 (M.C., M.P., J.-B.M.), 358 (E.V., F.S.), and 153 (A.R.-D.), Paris; Departement de Biostatistique et Informatique Medicale, Paris (B.G.); and Institut de Recherches Servier, Suresnes (P.J., J.-P.V.), France.
Correspondence to Jean-Baptiste Michel, INSERM U460, Remodelage CardioVasculaire, UFR de Médecine X. Bichat, 16, rue Henri Huchard, 75870 Paris Cedex 18, France.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: angioplasty angiotensin cells gene genetic
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ACE locus is well characterized in rats since the region of chromosome 10, which contains the ACE gene, is involved in BP regulation in rats,29 30 but no genetic linkage was found between the ACE gene and BP.31 A microsatellite marker was identified in the ACE gene, within intron 13, allowing distinction of ACE alleles between rat strains.29 30
We investigated the plasma ACE levels in various strains of rats and studied the degree of genetic determination of ACE expression in a cross between two strains of normotensive rats with contrasting levels of plasma ACE. In this study we determined at which step ACE gene expression was modulated by the polymorphism between the two strains of rats. We demonstrated a significant effect of strain on ACE activity in primary cultures of ECs, SMCs, and fibroblasts. Finally, we tested the hypothesis that the ACE alleles cosegregated with contrasting responses to carotid injury in a cross between these strains with contrasting plasma and tissular ACE.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Crossbreeding Procedures and Genotyping
Five female Lou rats (CNRS, Orleans, France) and five male BN
rats (Iffa Credo, L'Abresle, France) were mated to produce F1 hybrids.
Ten male and 10 female rats of the F1 generation were mated to produce
the F2 cohort.
The polymerase chain reaction primers and the procedure used to amplify the microsatellite located at the 5' end of intron 13 inside the rat ACE gene and characterized by a (CA)n repeat were described by Hilbert et al.29
Measurement of Membrane ACE Activity
Rats from the F2 cohort, eight homozygous for the Lou
microsatellite allele (LL F2) and eight homozygous for the BN
microsatellite allele (BB F2), were anesthetized with
sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg). Lungs were quickly excised, rinsed,
and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The procedure followed for the care and
killing of studied animals was in accordance with the European
Community Standards on the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
(Ministère de l'Agriculture, France; authorization 00577).
Lungs were homogenized in 10 vol of cold Tris-HCl buffer. The homogenate was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 1000g at 4°C, and the supernatant was incubated with Z-PHL, a synthetic ACE substrate.32 Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method.
Analysis of Lung ACE mRNA by Northern Blot
Total RNA from BB F2 and LL F2 lungs was extracted by the
Chomczynski and Sacchi method.33 Forty micrograms
of total lung RNA was used for Northern
blotting.34 RNA blots were probed with
TR31
rat ACE cDNA35 labeled with
-32P-dCTP. Prehybridization, hybridization,
and washing were performed in standard conditions. The lung ACE mRNA
was normalized to GAPDH mRNA by rehybridization of the blot with a
human GAPDH cDNA probe that cross-hybridizes to rat GAPDH mRNA. The
radiolabeled and hybridized probe was quantified by the ß Imager
1200.36
Run-On Assay
All procedures for isolation of nuclei from lungs were performed
on ice at 4°C. Lung nuclei from BB F2 and LL F2 rats were isolated as
described by Boggaramadn Mendelson.37 Each
transcription elongation reaction was carried out in the presence of
4x107 isolated nuclei as described by Mak et
al38 with slight modifications.
Equivalent amounts of radioactive RNA (7.5x106 cpm) from BN and Lou lungs were added to slot blots, three slots on the same blot, on which 10 µg of denatured pBluescript (as control), 10 µg of plasmid containing insert of rat ACE cDNA, or 10 µg of rat GAPDH cDNA had been immobilized to a nylon filter. After hybridization, the blots were washed,37 then exposed to Kodak Biomax MS film with an intensifying screen at -80°C for 1 to 3 days.
Vascular Cell Phenotypes
The three cell types from aortae (ie, ECs from intima, SMCs from
media, and fibroblasts from adventitia) of both Lou and BN inbred
strains were isolated and cultured as described by Battle et
al.39 The purity of the cultures was assessed
using immunohistological and morphological criteria.
ECs were stained for Von Willebrand factor and by RECA-1 (a monoclonal
antibody specific for rat endothelial cells, kindly
provided by Dr A.M. Duijvestijn, Maastricht, The
Netherlands40 ). At confluency ECs exhibited a
typical cobblestone pattern. SMCs were characterized using
-actin
antibodies.41 At confluency SMCs were typically
fusiform. Fibroblasts were negative to the previously cited stainings
and at confluency did not exhibit a specific organized pattern.
Morphological criteria are described in detail
elsewhere.39
At passage 2, cells were cultured in six-well tissue culture plates. At the third day of confluency, cells were deprived of serum for 24 hours. Dexamethasone was then added at a concentration of 1 nmol/L to 100 nmol/L in serum-free medium. Unstimulated cells were considered as controls.
After 48 hours of incubation with dexamethasone, the culture medium was recovered and frozen to measure soluble ACE activity. The cells were washed twice. To measure membrane ACE activity, the cells were directly incubated with the ACE substrate Z-PHL.32 Protein concentration was determined in each well.
Soluble ACE activity was measured by hydrolysis of a radiolabeled synthetic substrate, [glycine-1-14C]hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine (3 mCi/mmol).42 The presence of phenol red prevented the use of the fluorometric assay.
In Vivo Experiments
Blood pressure was measured by the tail cuff method in Lou and
BN rats and in homozygous F2 progeny (LL F2 and BB F2 rats). Body
weight and heart weight were assessed in the same animals.
Plasma Renin-Angiotensin System
Rats were killed by decapitation. Measurement of plasma renin
activity prevented the use of anesthesia. Plasma renin
activity was determined by radioimmunoassay of angiotensin
I generated in vitro.43 Angiotensinogen
concentration was determined in similar conditions by adding an excess
of mouse renin.44 Plasma angiotensin
I and II concentrations were measured according to the procedure of
Nussberger et al45 with slight
modifications.19
Response to Exogenous Peptides
Intravenous injections of angiotensin I
and bradykinin were performed in two groups of conscious, catheterized
homozygous (n=16) F2 rats. Rats were anesthetized with
pentobarbital (60 mg/kg) for catheter implantation.
Animals were pretreated during 1 week with a high-salt diet (1% NaCl in drinking water), then binephrectomized 24 hours before the experiment to suppress the endogenous renin-angiotensin system. Rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital (60 mg/kg) before binephrectomy. The experimental protocol is explained elsewhere in detail.46 Angiotensin I was successively injected at 50, 100, and 300 ng/kg IV every 15 minutes. Then, bradykinin was successively injected at 0.5, 1, and 2.5 µg/kg IV every 15 minutes. BP was monitored continuously.
Response to Balloon-Induced Arterial Injury
To determine whether the genotype of ACE would influence
neointima formation, homozygous F2 rats for the ACE
microsatellite (n=13) were anesthetized (5 mg/kg IP
acepromazine, 100 mg/kg IP ketamine), and a 2F balloon
embolectomy catheter was introduced through the external branch of the
left common carotid artery into the aortic arch. The vascular injury of
the left carotid artery was performed by slowly pulling out the
inflated balloon as described by Clowes et al.47
The procedure was repeated three times. The injury was applied without
knowing the animal's genotype.
Fourteen days after intimal injury, rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (60 mg/kg). The carotid artery removal procedure is described in detail elsewhere.48 Only the portion of the carotid artery that did not show any evidence of endothelial regeneration (positive staining after Evans blue injection) was used for histomorphometric studies. The portion was divided into four segments (2.5 mm long) and embedded in paraffin. Nonserial cross sections (5 µm) were prepared and stained with orcein to measure medial and neointimal cross-sectional areas. The distance between two cross sections was 50 µm. All histomorphometric analyses were performed in a double-blind manner with a computerized image-analysis system with 256 levels of gray and a 512x512 pixel grid (HISTO software). This system allows an overall analysis of the cross section. The internal elastic lamina was used as the border to distinguish the neointima from the media. For each carotid artery, neointimal and medial cross-sectional areas were averaged from the analysis of 12 cross sections (three cross sections per segment). The ratio of the cross-sectional area of the neointima to the cross-sectional area of the media was then calculated.
Cross sections were stained with red nucleus dye to quantify intimal and medial nuclear densities. Nuclear counting was performed manually, using a grid in the microscope eyepiece at a magnification of x400, by an observer blinded to the genotype of the samples. Nuclear counts were made on four fields per section, chosen at random at four cardinal points. Four sections were used per sample (n=8).
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical significance
of differences between strains was estimated by one-way ANOVA, followed
by Bonferroni's test. A three-way (fields, sections, and rats) nested
ANOVA was performed to provide evidence that differences observed in
the density of intimal cell nuclei during intimal proliferation were
related to the experimental genetic model rather than to the variance
of other steps of analysis. Covariance analysis
was used to test the effect of dexamethasone and the effect
of ACE genotype on cellular ACE activity and the interaction
between dexamethasone induction and the degree of genetic
determination of ACE expression in primary vascular cell cultures.
Statistical significance was reached when P was <.05.
The degree of genetic determination of plasma ACE concentration was estimated as (Vt-Ve)/Vt, where Vt was the total variance of the phenotype in the F2 cohort and Ve was a pooled estimate of the environmental phenotype variance in the Lou, BN, and F1 cohorts. The proportion of plasma ACE variance in F2 rats that could be attributed to the ACE microsatellite locus in the F2 cohort was deduced from the calculation by ANOVA of the sum of squares due to the genotypes compared to the sum of squares of plasma ACE in the F2 rats. The possibility of deviation from additivity of allelic effects (heterozygous mean at the midpoint of homozygous means) was tested using a regression analysis of plasma ACE levels on the numbers of BN alleles.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
ACE Genotype Effect on Plasma ACE Determination
The ACE microsatellite was polymorphic between the BN and Lou
strains, and the segregation of the BN alleles (B) and of the Lou
alleles (L) was analyzed in F1 and F2 progeny. All the F1
progeny were heterozygous for the BN and Lou alleles (BL). The
distribution of the ACE genotypes (BB, BL, and LL) in the F2
population was in accordance with Mendelian segregation.
Mean plasma ACE activity was measured in the F0, F1, and F2 groups
(Table 1
). The F1 generation exhibits
plasma ACE activity intermediate between the two parental strains, Lou
and BN, with a very small variance. In total, 40 F1 progeny were
produced (19 males and 21 females). There were no sex differences
(108.7±1.6 for the males versus 106.2±1.6 nmoles PHL/mL ·
min-1 for the females). In the F2 progeny,
plasma ACE activity was compared among the three groups defined by ACE
microsatellite genotype (LL, BL, and BB). Plasma ACE activity
was not significantly different between the LL F2 and the LL F0
progeny, between the BL F2 and the BL F1 progeny, and between the BB F2
and the BB F0 progeny. The degree of genetic determination (ratio of
genetic to total variance) in the F2 cohort was estimated as 94% for
plasma ACE activity. The ACE locus accounts for 74% of total plasma
ACE variance (80% of genetic variance). No deviation from additivity
of ACE polymorphism alleles on plasma ACE was observed.
|
Membrane ACE Activity and Expression in Lung Tissues of BN and
Lou Rats
Lung membrane ACE activity was higher in BN (n=8) than in Lou
(n=8) rats (890±64 versus 498±57 nmoles PHL/mg protein ·
min-1, P<.01). The lung ACE mRNA
level was also higher in BB F2 (n=7) than in LL F2 (n=7) progeny
(P<.001) (Fig 2
).
|
The transcription rate of the ACE gene in isolated nuclei from lung
tissues, calculated from the ratio of transcription rate of the ACE
gene to that of the GAPDH gene, was 1.8-fold higher in BB F2 (n=8) than
in LL F2 (n=8) progeny (P<.01) (Fig 3
).
|
ACE Phenotype in Cultured Arterial Cells
Results of analysis of covariance are summarized
in Table 2
and Fig 4
. All the slopes of the
covariances between dexamethasone doses and ACE
activity were significantly different from zero. There was no
significant interaction between genotype and
dexamethasone dose effects when membrane ACE activity of
ECs and SMCs were assessed. In ECs we observed a genotype
effect on the y intercept of covariance. When
soluble ACE activity in the culture medium was assessed, a significant
interaction between genotype and dexamethasone
effects was observed in both ECs and SMCs. In fibroblasts, we observed
a significant genotype-dexamethasone interaction
when membrane ACE activity was measured, whereas no interaction was
observed when it was assessed in the culture medium.
|
|
Vascular Response In Vivo
Pressure and Weights
Blood pressure was measured in 6-week-old Lou and BN rats
and in 10-week-old homozygous F2 progeny. The Lou and BN rats were both
normotensive, but the BP was significantly higher in the young BN rats
(n=8; 115.7±2.0 versus 128.7±2.5 mm Hg for Lou and BN,
respectively; P<.001). No differences were observed in the
BP between the LL F2 and the BB F2 rats (n=10; 134.0±2.7 versus
134.4±2.9 mm Hg; not significant).
In the BN rats (n=6), body and heart weights were significantly higher
as compared to the Lou rats(n=6), whereas no differences were detected
between the ACE homozygous F2 progeny (n=10) (Table 3
).
|
Functional Responses
There were no differences in plasma renin activity between the BN
(n=8) and the Lou rats (n=8). Similarly, no differences in plasma
angiotensinogen and angiotensin concentrations
were detected (Table 4
).
|
The basal level of blood pressure was not different between the
two groups (LL F2, 131.0±18.5; BB F2, 130.0±23.4 mm Hg).
Angiotensin I given at 50, 100, and 300 ng/kg elicited a
dose-dependent increase in mean BP in the two homozygous F2 groups (Fig 5
, A) (P<.0001). There was no
significant difference in the response between the LL F2 (n=8) and the
BB F2 (n=8) rats (F=0.23, not significant).
|
Bradykinin administration at 1, 2.5, and 5 µg/kg induced a
dose-dependent decrease in BP in the two homozygous F2 groups (Fig 5
, B) (P<.0001). No differences in the response were observed
between the LL F2 (n=8) and the BB F2 (n=8) rats (F=0.71, not
significant).
Structure Response to Vascular Injury by Ballooning
Fourteen days after injury of the carotid artery, we observed
formation of a massive neointima in both homozygous F2
progeny. However, the extent of the arterial lesion was
significantly influenced by the ACE genotype. Results are
summarized in Fig 6
. The
neointima area and the neointima/media ratio
were greater in the BB F2 group (n=13) than in the LL F2 group (n=11)
(P<.05), whereas media area remained unchanged (F=2.4, NS).
No differences were observed in the luminal (F=0.3; NS) and external
medial (F=2.4, not significant) perimeters between the two groups. The
density of intimal cell nuclei was significantly higher in BB F2 group
than in the LL F2 group (P<.001), whereas in the media the
density of cell nuclei was not different between the two groups (F=0.7,
not significant). Nested ANOVA showed that only the ACE
genotype significantly influenced the density of intimal cell
nuclei (field effect, F=0.8, not significant; section effect, F=0.3,
not significant).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We further analyzed two strains, the BN and the Lou strains, which exhibit the most contrasted values of plasma ACE. Phenotype analysis in founders, as well as in F1 and F2 progeny from a cross between these two strains, showed that the degree of genetic determination is responsible for nearly all phenotypic variance of plasma ACE. The use, in F1 and F2 progeny, of an ACE gene microsatellite, which was found to be polymorphic between the two strains, showed that the ACE locus itself explains 80% of the degree of genetic determination of plasma ACE. These results confirm previous results obtained in an F2 intercross population between the stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats and the normotensive Wistar-Kyoto strain.31 Thus, the observation made in normotensive rats mimics what is observed in humans, since in this latter case, a polymorphism of the ACE gene also explains a major part of genetic variance of the plasma ACE level.8 9
To identify the physiological mechanisms explaining the genetic modulation of plasma ACE values, we measured the ACE mRNA content and the ACE activity in lungs from F2 rats. These measurements clearly showed that both the mRNA and enzyme levels, which are mainly endothelial49 in this tissue, were related to the ACE locus polymorphism and suggested that the ACE gene expression was controlled at the transcriptional level. Run-on experiments, performed on nuclei isolated from lungs of F2 rats bearing different alleles of the ACE polymorphism, showed that the ACE transcription rate was nearly twofold higher in F2 rats homozygous for the B allele than in F2 rats homozygous for the L allele. The results obtained with tissular ACE correlated well with plasma differences between the two strains, but we cannot exclude additional mechanisms acting on plasma ACE values. It thus appears that the constitutive endothelial expression of ACE in vivo is controlled at the transcriptional level by a polymorphism likely located on the ACE gene. The sequencing of 1200 nucleotides of the 5' flanking region of the ACE gene in the two strains did not reveal significant differences, which could explain the different rates of transcription (data not shown). Therefore, these results raise interesting questions, as in humans, on the molecular mechanism of regulation of ACE gene expression, and its variation among rat strains, since other studied strains have intermediate plasma values.
The interaction between the ACE gene expression polymorphism and inducibility of the ACE gene in different cell types of the vascular wall was therefore studied in vitro. Analysis of covariance showed that ACE genotype influenced dexamethasone-induced ACE activity in the three vascular cell types in a different manner, by modifying either the constitutive ACE expression, as in ECs, or the slope of the inducibility, as in SMCs and fibroblasts.
In humans, the variation of the ACE concentration associated with the I/D polymorphism has been observed in plasma,8 T lymphocytes,11 and the heart,12 even if the relationship was weaker in tissues than in plasma, which was mainly due to technical reasons. In the rat, the relationship between ACE genotype and phenotype was similarly observed in plasma, tissues, and cultured vascular cells. Therefore, the ACE gene polymorphism in rats offers the possibility to test in vivo physiological effects of contrasted levels of ACE gene expression in response to various levels of vasoactive peptidic substrates of ACE.
Despite a striking difference in plasma ACE activity between the two strains, Lou and BN rats are both normotensive. It has been demonstrated that high levels of plasma ACE such as those found in some human pathologies50 are not associated with high BP. Several association studies in humans using the I/D marker of ACE did not show any significant relationship with BP.18 51 However, occasional positive associations between the DD genotype and hypertension have been reported.52 53 As in the plasma, there is a twofold difference in ACE activity in the lung between the BN and the Lou strains. The pulmonary vascular bed is well known to be the primary site for the "in vivo" conversion of plasma angiotensin I,54 55 and it has been suggested that the majority of plasma ACE is released by the pulmonary ECs.49 On the other hand, there are no significant differences in the plasma renin activity and the plasma angiotensinogen, angiotensin I, and angiotensin II concentrations between the two strains. Because of its high expression in the plasma-endothelium compartment, ACE is not a limiting step in the generation of angiotensin II or in the degradation of bradykinin in the plasma. Therefore, the genetically determined modulation of ACE expression did not interfere with the pressor or the depressor responses to intravenous vasoactive peptides, the conversion or degradation of which is ACE dependent, such as angiotensin I or bradykinin. In humans the implications of the I/D genotype for the response to angiotensin I are controversial. Ueda and coworkers56 showed an enhanced pressor response to angiotensin I in normotensive men with the DD genotype. On the other hand, our results in rats are in accordance with the results of Lachurié and coworkers19 in humans, which suggest that plasma ACE levels do not modify the rate of angiotensin II generation in plasma.
Beyond their functional vasomotor effects, vasoactive peptides and ACE are also involved in arterial wall postinjury remodeling. Several experimental studies have implicated the role of the renin-angiotensin system in the vascular response to endothelial injury. Administration of ACE inhibitors in rat, guinea pig, and rabbit inhibits neointimal development after arterial balloon denudation.6 57 This effect was dose dependent, but the doses of ACE inhibitors that were effective in suppressing neointima formation appeared to be higher than those used to lower BP.58 This discrepancy suggests a role of the local renin-angiotensin system in the pathogenesis of this model. The protective effect of ACE inhibitors appeared to be mediated by the inhibition of angiotensin II production because simultaneous infusion of angiotensin II and ACE inhibition restored the proliferative response to vascular injury and because specific angiotensin II receptor antagonism can partially inhibit neointima formation.59 In vitro angiotensin II has been shown to stimulate vascular smooth muscle growth and migration.60 Moreover, angiotensin II can be synthesized by local ACE. In contrast to plasma and endothelium, the level of basal ACE expression is low in vascular SMCs and mainly inducible.2 3 39 ACE overexpression in SMCs and fibroblasts may be one of the determining factors involving vasoactive peptides in the structural responses to vascular wall injury.1 4 7 The homozygous F2 progeny was used to test the relationship between ACE genotype and vascular remodeling in response to ballooning. The Lou and BN are both inbred rat strains. Genomic (data not shown) and phenotypic differences are numerous between these two strains. In the F2 progeny the entire genome of the two strains is mixed at random. Thus, differences observed in the balloon injury response, due to genetic differences other than the ACE gene, were minimized. Moreover, response to carotid injury is multifactorial, dependent in part on BP and on arterial wall structure (a close relation exists between body weight and arterial wall thickness). In the parental strains, significant differences were observed in BP and in body and heart weights, whereas in the ACE homozygous F2 progeny no significant differences were observed. Our data showed a significant increase in intimal proliferation, due probably to an increase in SMC proliferation in the F2 progeny with high ACE expression compared to those with low ACE expression. These data suggest that genetically determined ACE expression may influence the vascular wall response to injury, as proposed by Morishita and coworkers7 using ACE gene somatic transfer in the vascular wall.
Results of epidemiological studies in humans are contradictory. Many studies have shown that the ACE I/D polymorphism in humans is not associated with restenosis after balloon angioplasty.20 21 61 Moreover, two randomized trials (MERCATOR62 and MARCATOR63) have failed to demonstrate any beneficial effect of ACE inhibition on the occurrence of angiographic restenosis after balloon angioplasty. Nevertheless, experimental64 65 and clinical66 studies have suggested that the contribution of neointimal hyperplasia to restenosis after balloon angioplasty is relatively limited and that lumen renarrowing is in fact related primarily to vessel remodeling. Amant and coworkers67 recently demonstrated that the D allele of the ACE gene is associated with a greater late luminal loss after intracoronary stent implantation. In this case the stent prevents the remodeling process, and restenosis is primarily a consequence of neointimal hyperplasia within the stent.68 In accordance with this, a high expression of ACE was associated with a statistically significant increase in common carotid artery intima-media thickening,69 and an association between DD genotype and the extent of common carotid artery intima-media thickening has been reported.70 Those clinical data are concordant with our experimental results.
In conclusion, we observed a polymorphism in plasma ACE levels in different strains of rats similar to that observed in humans. We have demonstrated that the ACE gene is responsible for the major part of the genetic variance of plasma ACE levels and that the ACE gene is genetically regulated at the transcription level. In the experimental model of vascular injury by ballooning, the higher levels of ACE gene expression and inducibility are associated with a different neointima response. The ACE genotype appears to determine the ACE gene promoter activity in response to environmental stimuli. Nevertheless, such interactions between ACE genotype and cardiovascular responses to injury need to be confirmed using experimental models in congenic rats rather than in the F2 generation, where the genetic background remains heterogeneous between subjects. These data emphasize the importance of further studies trying to explain how the ACE gene polymorphism interacts with cardiovascular pathologies71 and to define more exactly its molecular basis in rats as well as humans.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 19, 1997; accepted October 8, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Fishel RS, Eisenberg S, Shai SY, Redden RA, Bernstein
KE, Berk BC. Glucocorticoids induce angiotensin-converting
enzyme expression in vascular smooth muscle. Hypertension. 1995;25:343349.
3. Arnal JF, Battle T, Rasetti C, et al. ACE in the three tunicae of the rat aorta: expression in smooth muscle and effect of renovascular hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:17771784.
4. Rakugi H, Kim DK, Krieger J, Wang D, Dzau V, Pratt R. Induction of angiotensin converting enzyme in the neointima after vascular injury. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:339346.
5. Takemoto M, Egashira K, Usui M, et al. Important role of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in the pathogenesis of coronary vascular and myocardial structural changes induced by long-term blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in rats. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:278287.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Powell JS, Clozel JP, Müller RKM, et al.
Inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme
prevent myointimal proliferation after vascular injury.
Science. 1989;245:186188.
7. Morishita R, Gibbons GH, Ellison KE, et al. Evidence for direct local effect of angiotensin in vascular hypertrophy: in vivo gene transfer of ACE. J Clin Invest.. 1994;94:978984.
8. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, Cambien F, Corvol P, Soubrier F. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:13431346.
9. Tiret L, Rigat B, Visvikis S, et al. Evidence, from combined segregation and linkage analysis, that a variant of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene controls plasma ACE. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51:197205.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Villard E, Tiret L, Visvikis S, Rakotovao R, Cambien F, Soubrier F. Identification of new polymorphisms of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene and study of their relationship to plasma ACE levels by two-QTL segregation-linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:12681278.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Costerousse O, Allegrini J, Lopez M, Alhenc-Gelas F. Angiotensin I converting enzyme in human circulating mononuclear cells: genetic polymorphism of expression in T-lymphocytes. Biochem J. 1993;290:3340.
12.
Jan Danser AH, Schalekamp MA, Bax WA, et al.
Angiotensin converting enzyme in the human heart: effect of
the deletion/insertion polymorphism. Circulation. 1995;92:13871388.
13.
Cambien F, Costerousse O, Tiret L, et al. Plasma level
and gene polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme
in relation to myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994;90:669676.
14.
Ludwig E, Corneli PS, Anderson JL, Marshall HW, Lalouel
JM, Ward RH. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene
polymorphism is associated with myocardial infarction but not with
development of coronary stenosis.
Circulation. 1995;91:21202124.
15. Schuster H, Wienker TF, Stremmler U, Noll B, Steinmetz A, Luft FC. An angiotensin-converting enzyme gene variant is associated with acute myocardial infarction in women but not in men. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:601603.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ohmichi N, Iwai N, Nakamura Y, Kinoshita M. The genotype of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and global left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:326329.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Pinto YM, van Gilst WH, Kingma JH, Schunkert H, for the Captopril and Thrombolysis Study Investigators. Deletion-type allele of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene is associated with progressive ventricular dilation after anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:16221626.[Abstract]
18. Jeunemaitre X, Lifton RP, Hunt SC, Williams RR, Lalouel M. Absence of linkage between the angiotensin converting enzyme locus and human essential hypertension. Nat Genet. 1992;1:7275.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Lachurié ML, Azizi M, Guyene TT, Alhenc-Gelas F,
Ménard J. Angiotensin converting enzyme gene
polymorphism has no influence on the circulating
reninangiotensin-aldosterone system or on
blood pressure in normotensives. Circulation. 1995;91:29332942.
20. Samani NJ, Martin DS, Brack M, et al. Insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and risk of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Lancet. 1995;345:10131016.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Hamon M, Bauters C, Amant C, et al. Relation between
the deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting
enzyme gene and late luminal narrowing after coronary
angioplasty. Circulation. 1995;92:296299.
22. Montgomery HE, Keeling PJ, Goldman JH, Humphries SE, Talmud PJ, McKenna WJ. Lack of association between the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:16271631.[Abstract]
23. Oosterga M, Voors AA, de Kam PJ, et al. Plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;95:26022609.
24. Abraham WT, Raynolds MV, Gottschall B, et al. Importance of angiotensin-converting enzyme in pulmonary hypertension. Cardiology. 1995;86:915.
25.
Katsuya T, Horiuchi M, Chen Y, et al. Relations between
deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting
enzyme gene and insulin resistance, glucose intolerance,
hyperinsulinemia, and dyslipidemia.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:779782.
26. Yoshida H, Mitarai T, Kawamura T, et al. Role of the deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme gene in the progression and therapeutic responsiveness of IgA nephropathy. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:21622169.
27. Harden P, Geddes C, Rowe PA, et al. Polymorphisms in angiotensin converting enzyme gene and progression of IgA nephropathy. Lancet. 1995;345:15401542.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Schmidt S, Schone N, Ritz E, for the Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group. Association of ACE gene polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy? Kidney Int. 1995;47:11761181.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Hilbert P, Lindpaintner K, Beckmann JS, et al. Chromosomal mapping of two genetic loci associated with blood-pressure regulation in hereditary hypertensive rats. Nature. 1991;353:521529.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Jacob HJ, Lindpainter K, Lincoln SE, et al. Genetic mapping of a gene causing hypertension in the stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat. Cell. 1991;67:213224.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Kreutz R, Hübner N, Ganten D, Lindpainter K.
Genetic linkage of the ACE gene to plasma
angiotensin-converting enzyme activity but not to blood
pressure. Circulation. 1995;92:23812384.
32. Piquilloud Y, Reinharz A, Roth M. Studies on the angiotensin converting enzyme with different substrates. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970;206:136142.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Thomas PS. Hybridization of denatured RNA and small
DNA fragment transfered to nylon membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A. 1980;77:52015205.
35. Costerousse O, Allegrini J, Huang H, Bouhnick J, Alhenc-Gelas F. Regulation of ACE gene expression and plasma levels during rat postnatal development. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:745753.
36.
Charpak G, Dominik W, Zaganidis N. Optical imaging of
the spatial distribution of ß-particles emerging from surfaces.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:17411745.
37.
Boggaram V, Mendelson CR. Transcriptional regulation of
the gene encoding the major surfactant protein (SP-A) in rabbit fetal
lung. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:1906019065.
38.
Mak JC, Nishikawa M, Barnes P.
Glucocorticosteroids increase ß2-adrenergic
receptor transcription in human lung. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:L41L46.
39. Battle T, Arnal JF, Challah M, Michel JB. Selective isolation of rat aortic wall layers and their cell types in culture: application to converting enzyme activity measurement. Tissue Cell. 1994;26:943955.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Duijvestijn AM, Van Goor H, Klatter F, et al. Antibodies defining rat endothelial cells: RECA-1, a pan-endothelial cell-specific monoclonal antibody. Lab Invest. 1992;66:459466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Gabbiani G, Schmid E, Winter S, et al. Vascular smooth
muscle cells differ from other smooth muscle cells: predominance of
vimentin filaments and a specific alpha-type actin. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:298302.
42. Cushman DW, Cheung HS. Spectrophotometric assay and properties of the angiotensin-converting enzyme of rabbit lung. Biochem Pharmacol. 1971;20:16371648.
43.
Menard J, Catt K. Measurement of renin activity,
concentration and substrate in rat plasma by radioimmunoassay of
angiotensin I. Endocrinology. 1972;90:422430.
44.
Michel JB, Sayah S, Nussberger J, et al.
Physiological and immunopathological consequences
of active immunization against murine renin in spontaneously
hypertensive and normotensive rats. Circulation. 1990;81:18991910.
45. Nussberger J, Brunner DB, Waeber B, Brunner HR. True versus immunoreactive angiotensin II in human plasma. Hypertension. 1985;7:1117.
46.
Gonzalez W, Fournié-Zaluski MC, Pham I,
Laboulandine I, Roques BP, Michel JB. Hypotensive and
natriuretic effects of RB 105, a dual inhibitor
of angiotensin converting enzyme and neutral
endopeptidase in hypertensive rats. J
Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;272:343351.
47. Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM. Kinetics of cellular proliferation after injury, I: smooth muscle growth in the absence of endothelium. Lab Invest. 1983;49:327333.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Janiak P, Pillon A, Prost JF, Vilaine JP. Role of
angiotensin subtype 2 receptor in neointima
formation after vascular injury. Hypertension. 1992;20:737745.
49. Erdös EG, Skidgel RA. The angiotensin I converting enzyme. Lab Invest. 1987;56:345348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Liebermann J. Enzymes in sarcoidosis-angiotensin converting enzyme. Clin Lab Med. 1989;9:745755.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Harrap SB, Davidson HR, Connor JM, et al. The
angiotensin I converting enzyme gene and predisposition to
high blood pressure. Hypertension. 1993;21:455460.
52. Morris B, Zee R, Schrader A. Different frequencies of angiotensin-converting enzyme genotypes in older hypertensive individuals. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:10851089.
53. O'Donnell CJ, Lindpaintner K, Larson MG, Ordovas JM, Myers RH, Levy D. The ACE deletion insertion polymorphism and hypertension: an association analysis in the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:84A. Abstract.
54.
Jan Danser AH, Koning MMG, Admiraal PJJ, et al.
Production of angiotensins I and I at tissue sites
in intact pigs. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H429H437.
55. Jan Danser AH, Chowdury S, de Lannoy L, van der Giessen W, Saxena P, Schalekamp M. Conversion and degradation of [125I] labelled angiotensin I in isolated perfused porcine coronary and carotid arteries. Cardiovasc Res. 1995;29:789795.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56.
Ueda S, Elliott HL, Morton JJ, Connell JM. Enhanced
pressor response to angiotensin I in normotensive men with
the deletion genotype (DD) for
angiotensin-converting enzyme. Hypertension. 1995;25:12661269.
57. Clozel JP, Hess P, Michael C, Schietinger K, Baumgartner HR. Inhibition of converting enzyme and neointima formation after vascular injury in rabbits and guinea pigs. Hypertension. 1991;18:I155I159.
58. Powell JS, Müller RKM, Rouge M, Kuhn R, Hefti F, Baumgartner HR. The proliferative response to vascular injury is suppressed by converting enzyme inhibition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16:S42S49.
59. Osterrieder W, Müller RKM, Powell JZ, Clozel JP, Hefti F, Baumgartner HR. Role of angiotensin II injury-induced neointima formation in rats. Hypertension. 1991;18:II60II64.
60. Naftilan AJ, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Induction of platelet-derived growth factor A chain and c-myc gene expressions by angiotensin II in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:14191424.
61. Kasi JC, Zhang Y, Calvino R, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and restenosis after coronary angioplasty, in unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:875877.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62.
The MERCATOR Study Group. Does the new
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor
cilazapril prevent restenosis after
percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty?
Results of the MERCATOR Study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. Circulation. 1992;86:100110.
63. The MARCATOR Study Group. Effect of high dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on restenosis: final results of the MARCATOR Study, a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cilazapril. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:362369.[Abstract]
64.
Kakuta T, Currier JW, Haudenschild CC, Ryan TJ, Faxon
DP. Differences in compensatory vessel enlargement, not intimal
formation, account for restenosis after angioplasty in the
hypercholesteremic rabbit model. Circulation. 1994;89:28092815.
65.
Lafont A, Guzman LA, Whitlow PL, Goormastic M, Cornhill
JF, Chisolm GM. Restenosis after experimental angioplasty:
intimal, medial, and adventitial changes associated with constrictive
remodeling. Circ Res. 1995;76:9961002.
66.
Mintz G, Popma J, Pichard A, et al.
Arterial remodeling after coronary angioplasty: a
serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996;75:299306.
67.
Amant C, Bauters C, Bodart J, et al. D allele of
the angiotensin I-converting enzyme is a major risk factor
for restenosis after coronary stenting.
Circulation. 1997;96:5660.
68.
Hoffmann R, Mintz G, Dusaillant G, et al. Patterns and
mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular
ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996;94:12471254.
69.
Bonithon-Kopp C, Ducimetière P, Touboul P, et al.
Plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and carotid
wall thickening. Circulation. 1994;89:952954.
70.
Castellano M, Muiesan LM, Rizzoni D, et al.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism and
arterial wall thickness in a general population.
Circulation. 1995;91:27212721.
71.
Lindpaintner K. Genetics of interventional
cardiology: old principles, new frontiers.
Circulation. 1997;96:1214.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Liu, C. O. C. Bellamy, M. A. Bailey, L. J. Mullins, D. R. Dunbar, C. J. Kenyon, G. Brooker, S. Kantachuvesiri, K. Maratou, A. Ashek, et al. Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Is a Modifier of Hypertensive End Organ Damage J. Biol. Chem., June 5, 2009; 284(23): 15564 - 15572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Copaja Soto, R. Valenzuela, A. Saldana, M. Paz Ocaranza, J. E. Jalil, C. Vio, P. Lijnen, G. E. Ordenes, R. Vivar Sanchez, S. Lavandero, et al. Early expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 correlates with the onset of isoproterenol-induced cardiac fibrosis in rats with distinct angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2008; 9(3): 154 - 162. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rivera, M. P. Ocaranza, S. Lavandero, and J. E. Jalil Rho Kinase Activation and Gene Expression Related to Vascular Remodeling in Normotensive Rats With High Angiotensin I Converting Enzyme Levels Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): 792 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Carter, G. Onder, S. B. Kritchevsky, and M. Pahor Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Intervention in Elderly Persons: Effects on Body Composition and Physical Performance J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2005; 60(11): 1437 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Pueyo, M. Challah, D. Gauguier, L. Louedec, M. Philippe, R. Gaertner, M. Marre, J.-B. Michel, and M.-P. Jacob Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Production Is Correlated With Genetically Determined ACE Expression in Congenic Rats: A Possible Link Between ACE Genotype and Diabetic Nephropathy Diabetes, April 1, 2004; 53(4): 1111 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Farrall Quantitative genetic variation: a post-modern view Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2004; 13(90001): R1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Ocaranza, G. Diaz-Araya, J. E. Carreno, D. Munoz, J. P. Riveros, J. E. Jalil, and S. Lavandero Polymorphism in gene coding for ACE determines different development of myocardial fibrosis in rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): H498 - H506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-P. Jacob, M. Cazaubon, A. Scemama, D. Prie, F. Blanchet, M.-C. Guillin, and J.-B. Michel Plasma Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 as a Marker of Blood Stasis in Varicose Veins Circulation, July 30, 2002; 106(5): 535 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gaertner, F. Prunier, M. Philippe, L. Louedec, J.-J. Mercadier, and J.-B. Michel Scar and pulmonary expression and shedding of ACE in rat myocardial infarction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): H156 - H164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Oliveri, M. P. Ocaranza, X. Campos, S. Lavandero, and J. E. Jalil Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Modulates Neutral Endopeptidase Activity in the Rat Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 650 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Coutard, W. Huang, M. Osborne-Pellegrin, and H. A. Kontos Heritability of Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Lesions and Cerebral Aneurysms in the Rat Editorial Comment Stroke, November 1, 2000; 31(11): 2678 - 2684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Gosgnach, M. Challah, F. Coulet, J.-B. Michel, and T. Battle Shear stress induces angiotensin converting enzyme expression in cultured smooth muscle cells: possible involvement of bFGF Cardiovasc Res, January 14, 2000; 45(2): 486 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nicoletti and J.-B. Michel Cardiac fibrosis and inflammation: interaction with hemodynamic and hormonal factors Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 1999; 41(3): 532 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Huang, F. A. Gelas, and M. J. Osborne-Pellegrin Protection of the Arterial Internal Elastic Lamina by Inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin System in the Rat Circ. Res., May 4, 1998; 82(8): 879 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |