Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17:1649-1656

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capron, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bruneval, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Capron, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bruneval, P.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17:1649-1656.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Repeated Balloon Injury of Rat Aorta

A Model of Neointima With Attenuated Inhibition by Heparin

Loïc Capron; Jacqueline Jarnet; Didier Heudes; Daniel Joseph-Monrose; ; Patrick Bruneval

From the Laboratoire de Recherches sur les Maladies Vasculaires Périphériques, Association Claude Bernard (L.C., J.J.), and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unité 430, Immunopathologie Humaine (D.H., D.J.-M., P.B.), Hôpital Broussais, Paris France.

Correspondence to Loïc Capron, MD, Service de Médecine Interne, l'Hôtel-Dieu, 1, Place du Parvis Notre-Dame, 75181 Paris Cedex 04, France.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract Repeated arterial injury, because it challenges already activated cells, may elicit a reaction that differs from that provoked by a single injury. We compared the response of rat aorta to single and double balloon injury and tested the inhibitory effect of heparin in both situations. For repeated injury, the first and second lesions were induced 3 weeks apart. Two weeks after repeated injury, the neointima that existed from the first lesion had expanded, with significant increases in intima-media wet weight and its DNA and elastin content and in the intima-to-media (I/M) thickness ratio. Two days after repeated injury, the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was enhanced in both the media and the intima, indicating that cells from both layers are involved in the aortic response to a second lesion. As established previously, treatment with heparin (continuous intravenous administration, 50 IU/kg · h-1) almost totally suppressed the response to single injury. However, heparin only attenuated the response to repeated injury, with a partial decrease in intima-media wet weight and its DNA and elastin content and in I/M thickness ratio. PCNA labeling showed that heparin inhibited the proliferative activity in medial cells much more strongly than in intimal cells. In conclusion, repeated aortic injury elicits a reaction of both the media and preexisting neointima. In this mixed response, neointimal smooth muscle cells are less sensitive than medial cells to inhibition by heparin, which results in a weakened effect of the drug on the fibromuscular reaction.


Key Words: heparin • balloon injury • restenosis • rat aorta • neointima • PCNA


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The fibromuscular response of arteries to experimental injury in various animal species has been studied extensively to understand the mechanism of restenosis after angioplasty and to find treatments to prevent restenosis.1 So far, although several drugs, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, heparin, and corticosteroids, have proved efficient in the experimental setting, none have been demonstrated in the clinical setting to have consistent efficacy in preventing restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease. The reasons for this discrepancy are unclear. One explanation could be that our experimental models are inadequate.2 Indeed, experimental injury occurs in a healthy artery, whereas in humans, angioplasty is performed in a severely diseased artery. An atherosclerotic stenosis, the usual indication for angioplasty, is a complex inflammatory thickening of the intima with a mixed population of cells (eg, arterial smooth muscle cells, monocytes, and lymphocytes) that are in variable states of activation.3 In sharp contrast, immediately after endothelial denudation by experimental injury, a normal inner arterial wall consists of multiple layers of mostly quiescent medial smooth muscle cells. It is conceivable that a pharmacological intervention that is inhibitory in the latter setting may become inefficient in the former setting because the cellular reactions and interactions in the two settings can be quite different.1 4

To explore this possibility, models of repeated injury are a logical proposition: a first (preparative) injury modifies the arterial wall by establishing an intimal thickening with activated cells; later on, a second (inductive) injury provokes an additive response that is used as the model to study restenosis experimentally. So far, the most widely exploited of these two-step protocols has been performed in rabbits with endothelial denudation accompanied by cholesterol feeding as the preparative injury and conventional dilatation using a balloon catheter as the inductive injury.1 2 5 6 7 8 9 In the investigation reported here, we adapted this experimental strategy to the rat aorta. Because rats do not respond to cholesterol feeding by developing arterial lipid deposits, we used dilatation with a balloon catheter for both the first and second injuries. A similar model of double injury was recently used by Gerdes et al10 in rabbit carotid artery. Heparin is a well-established inhibitor of the fibromuscular reaction to a single injury.11 12 Our working hypothesis was that heparin may exert a different degree of inhibition on the responses to single and double injuries, which would result from aortic cells being in a resting state and in an activated state, respectively, when the injury is induced.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
We used male Wistar rats (Iffa Credo, l'Arbresle, France) weighing 360 to 380 g (12 to 14 weeks old) at the outset of experiments. All aggressive procedures (catheterization of the aorta, implantation of osmotic pumps, and killing by severance of the lower abdominal aorta) were performed with the rats under anesthesia with ketamine hydrochloride (150 mg/kg body weight IP). Animals had free access to water and regular chow. They were killed by bleeding the abdominal aorta with a large-bore needle; blood was collected in EDTA (final concentration, 7.5 mmol/L) for determination of hematocrit and plasma anti-Xa activity with a chromogenic substrate (CBS31-39, Stago, Asnières, France).13 The experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of our institution and recommendations for the care and use of laboratory animals of the French Ministry of Agriculture (authorization 004814).

Aortic Injuries, Study Design, and Treatment
The aorta was submitted to two types of mechanical lesions that were either isolated or combined. Although the same balloon catheter (2F) was used to induce the lesions, lesions differed in both timing and route of catheter insertion: the first lesion was created on the first day (day 0) of the experiment by introducing the catheter via the left external carotid artery, and the second lesion was created on day 21 via the left common carotid artery. In each instance, the catheter was pushed into the aorta down to the level of the renal arteries, the balloon was inflated with fixed volumes of distilled water (50 µL, followed by an additional 50 µL after the passage of the diaphragm) to prevent any bias related to variations in the intensity of the stress applied to the aorta,14 and the catheter was pulled up until it was blocked at the origin of the left common carotid artery. This sequence was completed three times. The catheter was then removed, the artery used for inserting it was ligated, and the skin incision was closed with surgical staples. Sham operations consisted of ligating the corresponding artery without any catheter introduction. We used various combinations of actual catheterization and sham intervention to form four experimental groups of rats: L0, uninjured control rats (both operations were sham operations); L1, first injury only (second operation was a sham); L2, second injury only (first operation was a sham); and L1L2, both first and second injuries (Fig 1Down).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Study design and definition of groups. Each animal had two operations on the left carotid artery system: the first operation, on the first day of the experiment (day 0), involved the external carotid artery (Ext); the second operation, on day 21, involved the common carotid artery (Com). In each instance, the artery was either ligated (Lig) or catheterized to provoke aortic balloon injury (Bal). Continuous intravenous treatment (with either heparin or saline) was started immediately after the second operation in all groups except L0 (controls with uninjured aorta). The study comprised two experiments: in the main experiment (to measure the late tissue response), animals were killed on day 35, after 2 weeks of treatment; in the auxiliary experiment (Aux; to measure the early mitotic response), animals were killed on day 23, after 2 days of treatment. Vertical dotted lines indicate the date of death in each experiment.

After preliminary tests to establish the model (results not shown), the study comprised two experiments. The main experiment assessed the late fibromuscular response of the aorta 2 weeks after the second operation by measuring the wet weight of intima-media; its content in DNA, collagen, and elastin (using biochemical methods); and the thickness of the intima and media (using histomorphometry). In an auxiliary experiment, we explored the early mitotic response of the intima and media 2 days after the second operation by measuring the expression of PCNA using immunohistochemistry, a sensitive method for detecting proliferating cells in injured rat aorta.15

On day 21, ie, 3 weeks after the first carotid operation and immediately after the second one, an osmotic minipump was inserted into the peritoneal cavity of all animals except those in group L0; a 14-day pump was used for the main experiment (2-week treatment), and a 7-day pump was used for the auxiliary experiment (2-day treatment). A catheter connected to the pump was inserted into the left jugular vein for continuous intravenous delivery. The pump was loaded with either normal saline (control groups, indicated by a C after the group number) or heparin (treated groups, indicated by an H; sodium heparinate). To ensure immediate delivery of the contents, loaded pumps were primed by incubation in normal saline at 37°C for 24 hours before implantation. The concentration of heparin in the pump was adjusted to ensure an infusion rate of 50 IU/kg body weight · h-1. Treatment was assigned randomly so that the second lesion, when actually induced (groups L2 and L1L2), was inflicted without knowing to which group the animal would eventually belong.

Main Experiment
All animals were killed on day 35, ie, 5 weeks after the first carotid operation and 2 weeks after the second carotid operation and the beginning of treatment (Fig 1Up).

Biochemical Analysis of Intima-Media
The segment of thoracic aorta between the left subclavian and subcostal arteries was removed, and the intima-media was separated from the adventitia by dissection.16 The strips of intima-media from each aorta were blotted on filter paper, weighed (wet weight to assess the whole intima-media mass), then homogenized in 2 mL of Tris-EDTA (10 and 2 mmol/L, respectively). Analytical techniques were described previously.12 Briefly, the DNA content of each intima-media was determined using 1.5 mL of homogenate; the remaining 0.5 mL of homogenate was used to estimate two protein fractions of intima-media. After hydrolysis in 0.1 N NaOH for 50 minutes at 95°C, soluble and insoluble fractions were obtained and separated. Each fraction was then hydrolyzed in 6 N HCl for 48 hours at 105 to 110°C, and its hydroxyproline content was measured. Collagen and elastin contents of intima-media were estimated from the soluble and insoluble fractions, respectively, assuming a hydroxyproline content of 92 residues per 1000 for collagen and of 23 residues per 1000 for elastin.

Histomorphometry of Aorta
The segment including the first 4 to 5 mm of the abdominal aorta (between the subcostal and celiac arteries) was fixed in 10% formaldehyde for at least 48 hours, treated with graded alcohol solutions and xylene, and embedded in paraffin. From each segment, two nonadjacent 5-µm-thick cross sections were cut, and the slides were stained with orcein (elastic stain). Computer-assisted morphometry was performed using a Nachet 15000 analyzer working with 256 levels of gray on an image of 512x512 pixels and connected to a microcomputer with an image-analysis program. For each aortic section, eight random, noncontiguous microscopic fields (final magnification on video screen, x250; actual area, ~300 000 µm2; final calibration, 1.14 µm2 per pixel) were examined. An algorithm computed the mean thickness (in µm) of neointima and media in each field, from which the I/M thickness ratio was derived. To compute the mean thickness values (intima, media, and I/M) of an aorta, all measurements performed on the two sections of this aorta were averaged.

Auxiliary Experiment
All animals were killed 23 days after the beginning of the experiment (first carotid operation), ie, 2 days after the second carotid operation and the beginning of treatment (Fig 1Up). The whole aorta was fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 24 hours and processed for immunohistoenzymatic detection of PCNA. For each aorta, five nonadjacent 5-µm-thick paraffin sections were harvested on polylysine-coated slides at room temperature. Sections were stained using the following steps: pretreatment with 1 mmol/L EDTA buffer, pH 8, in a microwave oven, three times for 5 minutes each time; incubation with normal sheep serum to decrease background; rinsing; incubation with monoclonal antibody against recombinant rat PCNA (PC10 clone, Dako, Trappes, France) diluted 1/200 for 30 minutes; rinsing; detection of fixed antibodies using a biotinylated goat antibody against mouse IgG diluted 1/50 for 30 minutes, then streptavidin-peroxidase diluted 1/400 for 15 minutes with 1 mg/mL diaminobenzidine and 0.3% H2O2; and counterstaining with hematoxylin. The percentage of PCNA-positive (ie, proliferating) cells out of the total number of cells was determined by visual counting. For neointima, all microscopic fields with neointima formation were assessed in the five aortic sections; for media, all consecutive fields were counted in three randomly selected sections out of the five aortic sections available. A total of about 2500 medial cells and 1500 neointimal cells (when present) were examined in each aorta, and the average percentage of PCNA-expressing cells was computed for each layer.

Statistic Analyses
Group values are summarized as the mean±SEM. We used one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's modified t tests to compare heparin-treated animals with the saline-treated control animals and to compare both these groups with the corresponding uninjured group, which gave the baseline status of the aorta (ie, how the aorta would be if heparin had completely inhibited the response to injury). Therefore, for single injury, ANOVA included groups L2C, L2H, and L0, and for repeated injury, ANOVA included groups L1L2C, L1L2H, and L1C. We used an unpaired Student's t test to compare animal characteristics (body weight and hematocrit) between the control and heparin-treated groups in the same protocols of injury (L1, L2, and L1L2). Calculations were performed using SigmaStat for Windows, version 2.0. In all instances, two-sided P values are considered significant when<.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Main Experiment
The animal groups are described in Table 1Down. Intraperitoneal insertion of an osmotic pump for the last 2 weeks of the experiment resulted in a significant stagnation of body weight (P<.002, Student's t test): mean final body weight decreased from 435±13 g in group L0 (in which rats were operated on twice for carotid ligation but did not receive an osmotic pump, n=5) to 401±3 g in all other groups combined (n=47).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Animal Groups in Main Experiment

Repeated Versus Single Injury
Compared with the response in the uninjured state (L0), the fibromuscular response of aorta 2 weeks after balloon injury (L2C) was characterized by the formation of a neointima (increase of mean I/M thickness ratio, from 0 to 19±4%) with a parallel increase in the wet weight of intima-media and its DNA, collagen, and elastin contents. All these differences were statistically significant (Table 2Down and Fig 2Down). The L1C group, in which the aorta was studied 5 weeks after a single injury, when compared with the L2C group, studied 2 weeks after a single injury, provided information on how the neointima spontaneously evolves between 2 and 5 weeks: there was a modest expansion of the neointima during this 3-week interval, with the mean I/M thickness ratio increasing from 19±4% to 24±5% and the intima-media components and wet weight following a similar trend. A second injury applied 3 weeks after the first injury resulted in further expansion of neointima: in aortas from group L1L2C, all variables except collagen content of intima-media were significantly higher than in aortas from group L1C (injured once); and mean I/M thickness ratio reached 56±8%. In all types of injury, media thickness remained fairly constant (Table 2Down). The main point here is that an injured aorta retains its ability to react to a second mechanical stimulation by increasing its amount of fibromuscular tissue. As shown in Fig 3Down, a major mechanism in the second response is the addition of a second layer of neointima over the preexisting one.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Biochemical and Morphometric Results in Main Experiment



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Biochemical and morphometric results in main experiment. All aortas were collected on day 35, ie, 5 weeks after the first carotid operation and 2 weeks after the second carotid operation and beginning of treatment. For each variable (intima-media wet weight and content in DNA and elastin, I/M thickness ratio), two sets of three bars are presented: the left set (single injury) shows the results for groups L2 (second injury only: saline-treated control rats [C], n=8; and heparin-treated rats [H; 50 IU/kg · h-1], n=6) and L0 (reference group: no injury, no treatment, n=5); and the right set (repeated injury), results for groups L1L2 (first and second injuries: C, n=9; and H, n=10) and L1C (reference group: first injury only, saline treatment, n=7). In each set the three groups were compared pairwise using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's modified t tests. S indicates significant (P<.05); NS, not significant; bar height, group mean; T bar, SEM; hatched bars, C group; gray bars, H group; open bars, reference group (ie, how the aorta would be if heparin had completely inhibited the response to injury [L0 for single injury; L1C for repeated injury]). The results shown here are those obtained in group L1C (treated with saline), whose aortic variables did not differ from those of heparin-treated animals (see Table 2Up). The I/M thickness ratio is zero for all aortas in group L0.



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Intima-media morphology in main experiment. Representative sections of upper abdominal aorta from saline-treated rats: A shows group L2C (2 weeks after single injury); B, group L1C (5 weeks after single injury); and C, group L1L2C (5 weeks after first injury and 2 weeks after second injury). In aortas from group L1L2C (C), the neointima displays two distinct layers, a deep one with dense extracellular matrix (star) and a superficial one with looser matrix. The neointima in aortas from group L2C (A) comprises a single layer with looser extracellular matrix than in aortas from group L1C (B). N indicates neointima; and M, media. (Hematoxylin-eosin-saffron, bar=15 µm.)

Effect of Heparin Treatment
Continuous intravenous treatment with heparin (50 IU/kg · h-1) resulted in highly variable levels of plasma heparin (anti-Xa activity, 0.05 to 1.0 U/mL) because at the time of death, when blood was sampled, osmotic pumps were nearing the end of their delivery capacity, 2 weeks after their implantation. Heparin treatment induced minor bleeding with moderate anemia, as shown by significant lowering of the hematocrit (C versus H) in groups L2 and L1L2 (Table 1Up).

Heparin had a powerful inhibitory effect on the response to a single injury. In aortas from group L2H, all studied variables were significantly lower than in aortas from group L2C and remained quite close to the values found in uninjured aortas from group L0. The mean I/M thickness ratio in group L2H was 3±1%. Heparin treatment did not influence media thickness in this type of injury (as in any other; Table 2Up). Heparin administered between 3 and 5 weeks after a single injury (L1 groups) did not modify the composition of aortic intima-media (Table 2Up): the mean I/M thickness ratio was 24±2% in group L1H and 24±5% in group L1C. Because heparin did not influence the late (and modest) progression of the fibromuscular response, aortas from group L1C provided a suitable reference for assessing the influence of heparin on aortas from L1L2 groups (where this progression and the response to a second injury are assumed to be combined). Here, the influence of heparin, in contrast with that exerted on the reaction to a single injury, was attenuated. All variables except collagen were consistently lower in aortas from group L1L2H than in aortas from group L1L2C, but the decrease was significant only for intima-media wet weight. Means for aortas from group L1L2H were intermediate between those found in aortas from groups L1L2C and L1C; intima-media wet weight and DNA content were significantly higher in group L1L2H than in group L1C aortas; and the mean I/M thickness ratio was 56±8% in group L1L2C, 39±4% in group L1L2H, and 24±5% in group L1C.

Auxiliary Experiment
To explore further the contrasting influence of heparin on the response to single and double injury (complete versus partial inhibition), we assessed the early mitotic response of the aortic layers to a first and second injury with and without heparin treatment by counting the proportion of cells expressing PCNA (Figs 4Down and 5Down). The number of animals studied was five for group L0, five for group L2C, five for group L2H, four for group L1C, five for group L1L2C, and seven for group L1L2H; there was no L1H group.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunohistochemistry of PCNA: auxiliary experiment. Representative sections of thoracic aorta from saline-treated rats: A shows group L2C (2 days after single injury); B, group L1C (23 days after single injury); and C, group L1L2C (23 days after first injury and 2 days after second injury). Labeled nuclei appear dark and indicate cells with proliferating activity. In aortas from group L2C (A), no neointima is yet present, and several nuclei are labeled within the inner (luminal) part of media. In aortas from group L1C (B), proliferating activity is low, with scanty nuclei labeled in neointima. In aortas from group L1L2C (C), second injury boosted proliferating activity, with numerous labeled nuclei in neointima, close to the lumen. N indicates neointima; and M, media (letter placed just below internal elastic lamina). (Immunohistochemistry with peroxidase technique and hematoxylin counterstain, bar=15 µm.)



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Percentage of cells expressing PCNA in media and neointima after single and repeated aortic injury, with and without heparin treatment: auxiliary experiment. All aortas were collected 23 days after the beginning of the experiment (first carotid operation), ie, 2 days after the second carotid operation and onset of treatment with saline (control [C]) or heparin (H, 50 IU/kg · h-1). For media, two sets of three bars are presented: left set (single injury) shows the results for group L2 (second injury only: C, n=5; and H, n=5) and group L0 (reference group: no injury, no treatment, n=5); and the right set (repeated injury), those for group L1L2 (first and second injuries: C, n=5; and H, n=7) and group L1C (reference group: first injury only, n=4). For neointima, which was absent in aortas from groups L2 and L0, only one set is shown (repeated injury, groups L1L2 and L1). In each set the three groups were compared pairwise using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's modified t tests. S indicates significant (P<.05); NS, not significant; bar height, mean percentage of PCNA-positive cells (PCNA+) in group; T bar, SEM; hatched bars, C group; gray bars, H group; and open bars, reference group (ie, how the aorta would be if heparin had completely inhibited the mitotic response to injury [L0 for single injury; L1C for repeat injury]). No L1 animals treated with heparin were studied in this experiment.

Repeated Versus Single Injury
In the uninjured aorta, the mean percentage of PCNA-positive media cells was very low: 0.09±0.08%. Two days after a single injury (L2C), this ratio increased to 1.9±0.2%. Twenty-three days after a single injury (L1C), when a neointima had formed, the proportion of PCNA-positive cells in the media had fallen to 0.40±0.02%, although substantial proliferative activity persisted in the intima (8.1±1.1%). Two days after a second injury (group L1L2C), as compared with group L1C, there was a significant increase (P<.05) in PCNA-positive cells, both in the media (from 0.40±0.02% to 1.3±0.3%) and the neointima (from 8.1±1.1% to 16.1±2.6%). Clearly, the response to repeated injury elicits a proliferative reaction involving both the medial and intimal cells.

Effect of Heparin Treatment
In this experiment, intravenous heparin (50 IU/kg · h-1) induced higher and less dispersed levels of plasma anti-Xa activity than in the main experiment (1.5±0.2 and 1.3±0.1 U/mL in groups L2H and L1L2H, respectively) because blood was collected 2 days after implantation of the pump, while the device had its full delivery capacity. Two days after a single injury, the mean percentage of PCNA-positive media cells was lower (P<.05) in heparin-treated animals (group L2H, 0.95±0.10%) than in saline-treated animals (group L2C, 1.9±0.2%). Two days after a second injury, the same inhibition was observed under heparin treatment for medial cells (0.42±0.09% in aortas from group L1L2H versus 1.3±0.28% in aortas from group L1L2C, P<.05); however, heparin did not significantly decrease the expression of PCNA by intimal cells (14.5±1.4% in aortas from group L1L2H versus 16.1±2.6% in aortas from group L1L2C) (Fig 5Up).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Repeated arterial injury with a balloon catheter has been used previously in rabbits, leading to the uniform conclusion that a second lesion enhances intimal thickening as compared with a single one.10 17 18 19 Our results in the aortas of untreated rats confirm and extend these earlier findings: compared with a single injury (L1C group), a second injury inflicted 3 weeks after a first injury (L1L2C) significantly increases the whole mass (wet weight) of intima-media, its DNA and elastin content, and the I/M thickness ratio; however, the collagen content of intima-media remained unaffected by reinjury. Immunohistoenzymatic staining for PCNA 2 days after the second injury further indicates that cells from both the media and neointima participate in the additional proliferative response: the mean percentage of PCNA-positive cells was about three times higher in the media and two times higher in the neointima from twice-injured aortas from the L1L2C group than in once-injured aortas from the L1C group. Cells from a neointima formed 3 weeks after a first injury are still able to proliferate in response to a second injury. Neointimal cells remain in a state of activation for several weeks after balloon injury, with enhanced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1, class II major histocompatibility antigen,20 or basic fibroblast growth factor21 ; other distinct biological features of cells from rat neointima, such as increased migratory22 and proliferative23 activity, the expression of platelet-derived growth factor-B chain,24 or altered responses to platelet-derived growth factor and other stimuli,25 have been reported in vitro. Most smooth muscle cells cultivated from rat aortic neointima (15 days after balloon injury) exhibit an epithelioid phenotype characterized by serum-independent growth and enhanced migration.26

The principal aim of our study was to test whether, given their state of sustained activation, cells from a previously injured artery remain sensitive to pharmacological inhibition when challenged by a second injury. For that purpose we selected heparin because, like many other groups since the pioneering study by Guyton et al,11 we have found it to be among the most powerful inhibitors of the arterial response to a single injury.12 Our results in the L2 groups confirm this eloquently: continuous intravenous treatment with heparin (50 IU/kg · h-1) suppressed the reaction; 2 weeks after a single injury, aortas from group L2H were indistinguishable from uninjured aortas from group L0 except for a tenuous intimal thickening; 2 days after injury, PCNA expression by medial cells was significantly lowered (by 50%) in aortas from group L2H as compared with aortas from group L2C. In contrast, the inhibitory effect of heparin on the fibromuscular response to repeated injury was less clear-cut: 2 weeks after the second lesion was induced, the intima-media wet weight in aortas from group L1L2H was significantly lower than in aortas from group L1L2C but remained significantly higher than in the reference group (once-injured aortas, group L1C); except for the collagen content of intima-media (which did not vary significantly in response to a second injury), all variables displayed the same trend, with values in group L1L2H intermediate between those in groups L1L2C and L1C. PCNA labeling 2 days after the second injury indicated that heparin did not significantly reduce (by 10%) the mean proliferative activity of neointima cells, although it did significantly inhibit (by 68%) proliferation in the media. The nonsignificant inhibition of intimal cells by heparin after reinjury cannot be interpreted as complete heparin resistance, yet intima cells are clearly less inhibited by heparin than media cells.

The incapacity of heparin to inhibit neointimal cells as strongly as medial cells can explain why the drug loses a substantial part of its power against the aortic response to repeated injury, a reaction that elicits both medial and neointimal cells. This difference suggests that, contrary to medial cells that are in (or have regained) a quiescent state, activated neointimal cells tend to become insensitive to heparin. Previous in vitro studies support this conclusion by showing that arterial smooth muscle cells can be or become resistant to the antiproliferative effect of heparin. Such is the case for cells cultured from the aorta of spontaneously hypertensive rats27 and for selected cell lines from normal rat aorta that have been subjected to continuous passage in media containing heparin.28 In eight patients with coronary artery disease who underwent reoperation for venous graft stenosis, cells cultured from restenotic lesions displayed a much lower sensitivity to growth inhibition by heparin than cells harvested in normal arteries or veins from patients without restenosis.29 Caplice et al30 examined the outgrowth of smooth muscle cells from cultured coronary artery explants of primary atherosclerotic plaques and of undiseased regions. For undiseased tissue, heparin significantly delayed the time required for reaching the half-maximum percentage of outgrowth from the explant. For plaque tissue, heparin had no such effect, suggesting that heparin acts differently depending on the phenotype and proliferative state of the cells involved in outgrowth (a phenomenon that combines cell proliferation and migration). This conclusion, although reached in a very different setting, agrees well with our own observations in vivo. However, in closer relation with our model, heparin did inhibit the growth of smooth muscle cells cultured (fifth passage) from the neointima of rat thoracic aorta (2 weeks after balloon injury).31

Heparinoids have been tested in other types of combined arterial aggressions with variable results: unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin decreased cellular proliferation but had no significant effect on neointima thickness in rabbit carotid artery submitted to electrical stimulation and cholesterol-rich diet followed by balloon angioplasty;7 low-molecular-weight heparin decreased neointima formation in minipig coronary artery submitted to cholesterol-rich diet and balloon injury followed by stent implantation,8 as well as in rabbit iliac artery challenged with combined cholesterol diet and balloon angioplasty;5 and heparin (delivered either locally or subcutaneously) failed to reduce plaque formation and luminal narrowing in rabbit femoral artery submitted to cholesterol-rich diet and air desiccation injury followed by balloon angioplasty.2 Overall, these observations in rabbit and pig arteries partially support those we report here in rat aorta, ie, heparin can be less potent in inhibiting neointima formation after repeated arterial injury than after a single injury. Interestingly, in the rabbit carotid artery, Gerdes et al10 found that treatment with the thrombin inhibitor hirudin is slightly more effective in decreasing neointima formation after a single injury (59% inhibition) than after a double injury (44% inhibition).

This study has several limitations. Repeated balloon injury to rat aorta is a highly simplified model for the study of restenosis after angioplasty in humans. The target lesion (fibromuscular neointima formed 3 weeks after a first injury) lacks several capital features of an atherosclerotic plaque, such as extracellular and intracellular lipid deposition, infiltration by monocytes and T lymphocytes, and neovascularization. Aside from proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells and from extracellular matrix synthesis, many aspects likely to be implied in the arterial reaction to angioplasty are absent, such as plaque rupture, intraplaque hemorrhage, mural thrombus formation, elastic recoil, and remodeling. Sensitivity of smooth muscle cells to inhibition by heparin varies between species, as documented recently by Geary et al.32 In that study, conducted in baboons, a species more closely related to humans than rats, low-molecular-weight heparin failed to inhibit intimal thickening and smooth muscle cell proliferation after a single arterial injury. Culture studies have identified heparin-sensitive and -insensitive pathways in the stimulation of baboon smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation. In our model, the exact mechanisms involved in the relative resistance of intimal cells to heparin remain to be determined.

Our results, along with those of some previous studies,2 7 30 could help to explain why heparin is inefficient in preventing restenosis after angioplasty in patients with coronary heart disease.33 Activated smooth muscle cells, like those present in experimental neointima and atherosclerotic plaques, may become less sensitive to inhibition by heparin. Although the cellular composition of a rat aortic neointima is much less complex than that of an atherosclerotic plaque (where, besides smooth muscle cells, activated leukocytes are present in large numbers),3 repeated arterial injury brings us one small step closer to the real situation of restenosis. In rats, this experimental model, which is simpler than rabbit models of combined arterial aggressions, might prove more useful than single arterial injury for testing drugs to prevent the most common complication of angioplasty, which has thus far almost invariably resisted pharmacological prevention.

Note Added in Proof
H. Koyama and M.A. Reidy (Circ Res. 1997;80:408–417.) recently published a study on the response of rat carotid artery to repeated injury with a balloon catheter. An intravenous injection of heparin (888 u/kg body weight) 10 minutes before injury failed to decrease the replicative activity of smooth muscle cells in the neointima, measured 2 days after reinjury, but strongly inhibited the mitotic response of the media to single injury.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
anti-Xa = anti-activated factor X
PCNA = proliferating cell nuclear antigen
I/M = intima-to-media (thickness ratio)


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by a grant from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.

Received September 20, 1996; accepted December 6, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Jackson CL. Animal models of restenosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1994;4:122-130.

2. Gimple LW, Gertz SD, Haber HL, et al. Effect of chronic subcutaneous or intramural administration of heparin on femoral artery restenosis after balloon angioplasty in hypercholesterolemic rabbits: a quantitative angiographic and histopathological study. Circulation. 1992;86:1536-1546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Rekhter MD, Gordon D. Active proliferation of different cell types, including lymphocytes, in human atherosclerotic plaques. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:668-677.[Abstract]

4. Schwartz SM, deBlois D, O'Brien ERM. The intima: soil for atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circ Res. 1995;77:445-465.[Free Full Text]

5. Faxon DP, Weber VJ, Haudenschild C, Gottsman SB, McGovern WA, Ryan TJ. Acute effects of transluminal angioplasty in three experimental models of atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis. 1982;2:125-133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Currier JW, Pow TK, Haudenschild CC, Minihan AC, Faxon DP. Low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparine) reduces restenosis rate after iliac angioplasty in the hypercholesterolemic rabbit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:B118-B125.

7. Hanke H, Oberhoff M, Hanke S, et al. Inhibition of cellular proliferation after experimental balloon angioplasty by low-molecular-weight heparin. Circulation. 1992;85:1548-1556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Buchwald AB, Unterberg C, Nebendahl K, Gröne HJ, Wiegand V. Low-molecular-weight heparin reduces neointimal proliferation after coronary stent implantation in hypercholesterolemic minipigs. Circulation. 1992;86:531-537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Wilensky RL, March KL, Graduspizlo I, Sandusky G, Fineberg N, Hathaway DR. Vascular injury, repair, and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the atherosclerotic rabbit. Circulation. 1995;92:2995-3005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Gerdes C, Faber-Steinfeld V, Yalkinoglu Ö, Wohlfeil S. Comparison of the effects of the thrombin inhibitor r-hirudin in four animal models of neointima formation after arterial injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:1306-1311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Guyton J, Rosenberg R, Clowes A, Karnovsky MJ. Inhibition of rat arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation by heparin. I: in vivo studies with anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant heparin. Circ Res. 1980;46:625-634.[Free Full Text]

12. Chajara A, Heudes D, Péronneau I, Jarnet J, Basset A, Capron L. Effects of heparinoids on the sclerotic response of rat thoracic aorta to injury: comparison between standard and low-molecular-weight heparins in vitro and in vivo. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;23:995-1003.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Aiach M, Michaud A, Capron L, Fiessinger JN. Determination of factor X and heparin with chromogenic substrate. Acta Chir Scand. 1982;(suppl 309):109-114.

14. Capron L, Bruneval P. Influence of applied stress on mitotic response of arteries to injury with a balloon catheter: quantitative study in rat thoracic aorta. Cardiovasc Res. 1989;23:941-948.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Zeymer U, Fishbein MC, Forrester JS, Cercek B. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemistry in rat aorta after balloon denudation: comparison with thymidine and bromodeoxyuridine labeling. Am J Pathol. 1992;141:685-690.[Abstract]

16. Wolinsky H, Daly MM. A method for the isolation of intima-media samples from arteries. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1970;135:364-368.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Moore S, Belbeck LW, Richardson M, Taylor W. Lipid accumulation in the neointima formed in normally fed rabbits in response to one or six removals of the aortic endothelium. Lab Invest. 1982;47:37-42.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Jørgensen L, Grothe AG, Groves HM, Kinlough-Rathbone RL, Richardson M, Mustard JF. Sequence of cellular responses in rabbit aortas following one and two injuries with a balloon catheter. Br J Exp Pathol. 1988;69:473-486.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Niimi Y, Azuma H, Hirakawa K. Repeated endothelial removal augments intimal thickening and attenuates EDRF release. Am J Physiol. 1994;266(Heart Circ Physiol):H1348-H1356.

20. Tanaka H, Sukhova GK, Swanson SJ, et al. Sustained activation of vascular cells and leukocytes in the rabbit aorta after balloon injury. Circulation. 1993;88:1788-1803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. More RS, Brack MJ, Underwood MJ, Gershlick AH. Growth factor persistence after vessel wall injury in a rabbit angioplasty model. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:1031-1032.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Péronneau I, Gavoille A, Péronneau P, Dubray C, Capron L. Heterogeneity in migration of smooth muscle cells from normal and injured rat thoracic aorta in primary culture. Cardiovasc Res. 1995;29:38-43.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Orlandi A, Ehrlich HP, Ropraz P, Spagnoli LG, Gabbiani G. Rat aortic smooth muscle cells isolated from different layers and at different times after endothelial denudation show distinct biological features in vitro. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:982-989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Lindner V, Giachelli CM, Schwartz SM, Reidy MA. A subpopulation of smooth muscle cells in injured rat arteries expresses platelet-derived growth factor-B chain mRNA. Circ Res. 1995;76:951-957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Majack RA, Grieshaber NA, Cook CL, et al. Smooth muscle cells isolated from the neointima after vascular injury exhibit altered responses to platelet-derived growth factor and other stimuli. J Cell Physiol. 1996;167:106-112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Bochaton-Piallat ML, Ropraz P, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G. Phenotypic heterogeneity of rat arterial smooth muscle cell clones: implications for the development of experimental intimal thickening. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:815-820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Resink TJ, Scott-Burden T, Baur U, Bürgin M, Bühler FR. Decreased susceptibility of cultured smooth muscle cells from SHR rats to growth inhibition by heparin. J Cell Physiol. 1989;138:137-144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. San Antonio JD, Karnovsky MJ, Ottlinger ME, Schillig R, Pukac LA. Isolation of heparin-insensitive aortic smooth muscle cells: growth and differentiation. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:748-757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Chan P, Patel M, Betteridge L, et al. Abnormal growth regulation of vascular smooth muscle cells by heparin in patients with restenosis. Lancet. 1993;341:341-342.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Caplice NM, West MJ, Campbell GR, Campbell J. Inhibition of human vascular smooth muscle cell growth by heparin. Lancet. 1994;344:97-98.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Orlandi A, Ropraz P, Gabbiani G. Proliferative activity and {alpha}-smooth muscle actin expression in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells are differently modulated by transforming growth factor-ß1 and heparin. Exp Cell Res. 1994;214:528-536.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Geary RL, Koyama N, Wang TW, Vergel S, Clowes AW. Failure of heparin to inhibit intimal hyperplasia in injured baboon arteries: the role of heparin-sensitive and -insensitive pathways in the stimulation of smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation. Circulation. 1995;91:2972-2981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Brack MJ, Ray S, Chauhan A, et al. The Subcutaneous Heparin and Angioplasty Restenosis Prevention (SHARP) Trial: Results of a multicenter randomized trial investigating the effects of high dose unfractionated heparin on angiographic restenosis and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:947-954.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
B. Liu, M. Han, and J.-K. Wen
Acetylbritannilactone Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia after Balloon Injury of Rat Artery by Suppressing Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Activation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2008; 324(1): 292 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
Y.-Y. Fan, K. S. Ramos, and R. S. Chapkin
Dietary {{gamma}}-Linolenic Acid Suppresses Aortic Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Modifies Atherosclerotic Lesions in Apolipoprotein E Knockout Mice
J. Nutr., June 1, 2001; 131(6): 1675 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. BARIÉTY, P. BRUNEVAL, G. HILL, T. IRINOPOULOU, C. MANDET, and A. MEYRIER
Posttransplantation Relapse of FSGS Is Characterized by Glomerular Epithelial Cell Transdifferentiation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2001; 12(2): 261 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
H. Koyama and M. A. Reidy
Expression of Extracellular Matrix Proteins Accompanies Lesion Growth in a Model of Intimal Reinjury
Circ. Res., May 19, 1998; 82(9): 988 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capron, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bruneval, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Capron, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bruneval, P.