Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17:1392-1399

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koivisto, U.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Kontula, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koivisto, U.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Kontula, K.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17:1392-1399.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Familial Moderate Hypercholesterolemia Caused by Asp235->Glu Mutation of the LDL Receptor Gene and Co-occurrence of a De Novo Deletion of the LDL Receptor Gene in the Same Family

Ulla-Maija Koivisto; Helena Gylling; Tatu A. Miettinen; ; Kimmo Kontula

From the Departments of Medicine (U.-M.K., H.G., T.A.M., K.K.) and of Pharmacology and Toxicology (U.-M.K.), University of Oulu, and Department of Medicine (K.K.), University of Helsinki (Finland).

Correspondence to Kimmo Kontula, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, FIN 00290, Helsinki, Finland.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract We identified a large family in which a hitherto unreported point mutation of the LDL receptor gene (Asp235->Glu) cosegregated with moderately elevated serum LDL cholesterol concentration. Within one generation, the mean serum total and LDL cholesterol levels in four heterozygous carriers of this mutation (7.76±1.46 and 5.89±1.56 mmol/L, respectively) were significantly (P<.05) higher than the corresponding concentrations in their five nonaffected siblings (5.81±0.57 and 3.77±0.54 mmol/L, respectively). Lipid levels in carriers of the Asp235->Glu mutation were, however, markedly lower than the corresponding total and LDL cholesterol levels (about 12 and 10 mmol/L, respectively) in heterozygous patients with the two common LDL receptor mutations (FH-Helsinki and FH-North Karelia). None of the four siblings in the age range of 54 to 69 years had experienced a myocardial infarction, although symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease were present in two and tendon xanthomas were found in one. Expression of the mutant receptor in COS cells indicated an approximately 50% to 70% reduction of LDL-binding activity compared with the normal receptor. One patient (female, aged 39 years) had severe hypercholesterolemia in the range of 13 to 20 mmol/L when untreated, extensive coronary artery disease as demonstrated by angiography, and extensor tendon xanthomatosis. In addition to the Asp235->Glu mutation, she was found to have a de novo deletion of exons 14 and 15 in her other LDL receptor allele. In this subject, the total LDL receptor activity of mitogen-stimulated blood lymphocytes was very low. In conclusion, along with another LDL receptor gene mutation (FH-Espoo or deletion of exon 15) described by us previously, the Asp235->Glu mutation (designated as FH-Keuruu) indicates that moderate varieties of inherited hypercholesterolemia may result from LDL receptor gene mutations of mild expression.


Key Words: LDL receptor gene mutation • familial hypercholesterolemia


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Familial hypercholesterolemia, or FH, an autosomal codominant disorder of lipoprotein disorder with a prevalence of about 1 in 500, results from mutations of the LDL receptor gene.1 At the DNA level, FH is extremely heterogenous, and by 1992 more than 150 different LDL receptor mutations had been described.2 When present in a heterozygous form, most of the mutations identified thus far have been reported to cause a typical clinical picture of FH, with grossly elevated serum LDL cholesterol levels, tendon xanthomas, and premature coronary heart disease.

Patients with homozygous FH have been shown to have considerable interindividual variation in serum cholesterol levels as well as in the expression of coronary heart disease,3 which in one study was directly attributed to the nature of the causative mutation.4 In heterozygous FH, common genetic variation of gene loci other than the LDL receptor gene, such as those encoding apolipoprotein B,5 6 apolipoprotein E,7 8 9 10 11 12 13 and lipoprotein lipase,14 has been suggested to contribute to the clinical expression of the disease. Common variation of the intact LDL receptor allele may also exert subtle influence on serum cholesterol levels in patients with heterozygous FH.15 In addition, relatively mild clinical features of patients with Chinese heterozygous FH with receptor-negative mutations were postulated to be explained by dietary and other environmental factors prevailing in that particular population.16

There is, however, evidence that the particular type of the underlying LDL receptor gene mutation may affect serum lipid levels17 18 and their response to treatment with HMG-CoA inhibitors,19 20 even in patients with the heterozygous form of FH. Two recent studies21 22 directly demonstrated the occurrence of mutations of the LDL receptor gene that cause a "mild" clinical phenotype of heterozygous FH. The Finnish FH-Espoo mutation selectively deletes exon 15 of the LDL receptor gene, encoding the carbohydrate-containing extracellular domain of the receptor protein, and results in a moderate variety of inherited hypercholesterolemia,21 and the FH Afrikaner-3 mutation, substituting Asn for Asp at amino acid 154 in the ligand-binding domain of the LDL receptor protein,22 was shown to be associated with lower serum cholesterol levels and less clinical severity than another founder mutation (FH Afrikaner-2) prevalent in the same population studied. The present work adds an important adjunct to these previous findings to raise the idea that "mild" mutations of the LDL receptor gene occur in the population and also describes a rarely occurring de novo mutation of the LDL receptor gene in the same family.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The Proband and Her Family
The proband, a woman born in 1956, was examined because of extensor tendon xanthomatosis at the Lipid Outpatient Clinic of the University Hospital of Helsinki in 1976. Her serum total cholesterol level from 1976 to 1982 varied between 13 and 20 mmol/L with a mean value of 17.5 mmol/L. Her serum HDL cholesterol level was 0.7 to 1.3 mmol/L, and her serum triglyceride level about 1 mmol/L. Cholestyramine, nicotinic acid, or clofibrate, alone or in combination, resulted in unsatisfactory hypolipidemic responses. Symptoms suggesting angina pectoris developed, and coronary angiography carried out in 1985 disclosed three-vessel coronary artery disease. Treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and resin was instituted, and in 1991, while on lovastatin 80 mg/d and colestipol 10 g/d, her serum cholesterol level was 5.6 mmol/L, her HDL cholesterol level was 0.72 mmol/L, and her triglyceride level was 0.65 mmol/L. Since then her condition has been relatively good, with occasional exertion angina still present. Late in 1995 she became pregnant, and she delivered a healthy boy in July 1996. She gave her informed consent to carry out DNA analysis of the cord blood.

The proband has four sisters and one brother, all in good health (Fig 1Down). The father of the proband, born in 1924, is healthy, and his serum cholesterol level is normal (5.6 mmol/L). The mother of the proband (Fig 1Down), born in 1926, is in relatively good health. She has no angina or claudication, but a submaximal ergometer test performed in 1987 showed a 2-mm depression of the ST segments in the anterior electrocardiogram leads; she is currently on hypolipidemic drugs and being followed up by a general practitioner. The oldest sister of the proband's mother died of gastric cancer, but all the remaining siblings (four sisters, four brothers) were available for DNA studies and analysis of serum lipid levels (Fig 1Down).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Pedigree of the family. The figures beneath individual symbols (circles, females; squares, males) indicate the year of birth and serum total cholesterol level. Cholesterol measurements were conducted in 1987 (proband and generation I) and 1992 (siblings of the proband). In subject III-1, cholesterol was assayed in the umbilical cord serum.

DNA Analysis
Details on the screening for gross rearrangements in the LDL receptor gene by Southern blot analysis are given in another report.23 For screening of minor gene rearrangements, all 18 exons of the LDL receptor gene were individually amplified from genomic DNA by PCR, and SSCP analysis was performed essentially as described by Orita et al.24 PCR primers contained the same intron sequences of the LDL receptor gene as those published by Leitersdorf et al.25

The exon 5 variant was further characterized by direct sequencing of the double-stranded PCR product according to a modification of the dideoxy chain termination method.26 Screening for the mutation in other family members and unrelated hyperlipidemic individuals was carried out by NciI restriction enzyme digestion of amplified exon 5, followed by analysis on 2% agarose gels.

A search for the presence of the deletion allele (deletion of exons 14 and 15) in the child of the proband was carried out by a PCR technique. DNA was amplified using the primers25 SP78 (5'-GTCATCTTCCTTGCTGCCTGTTTAG-3') and SP85 (5'-CGCTGGGGGACCGGCCCGCGCTTAC-3'). Under these conditions, the normal allele does not result in visible amplification products, and the deleted allele generates a fragment of approximately 1800 bp, permitting its identification upon electrophoresis on 1% agarose.

RNA Amplification and Sequence Analysis
Total RNA was isolated27 from fibroblasts obtained from a skin biopsy specimen of the patient with the deletion. First-strand cDNA synthesis was accomplished by extension with primer 3588 (5'-ATCCCAACACACACGACAGA-3'), complementary to normal exon 18 sequence. One-half of the reverse-transcription mixture was then included into a 50-µL PCR with 50 ng each of primers 91483 (5'-GTTCTTAAGCCGCCAGTTCT-3') and 91363 (5'-AGTGCCAACCGCCTCACAGG-3'), complementary to the normal exon 17 and exon 13 LDL receptor sequences, respectively. PCR was carried out for 40 cycles with a temperature profile of 95°C, 55°C, and 72°C for 1 minute each. The amplification product corresponding to the deleted mRNA was isolated from a 2% agarose gel and purified by Qiaex gel extraction according to the supplier's protocol. Sequence determination was carried out by direct sequencing of the PCR product as described above for genomic DNA.

Plasmid Construction and Expression of the Mutant LDL Receptor cDNA
The cDNA encoding the LDL receptor was subcloned into the phagemid pALTER-1. A point mutation of GAC (Asp 235) to GAA (Glu) was introduced into single-stranded phagemid DNA using the mutagenic oligonucleotide 3874 (5'-ATATTCCCGTTCACACTGCC-3') according to the supplier's protocol (Altered Sites In Vitro Mutagenesis Kit). Oligonucleotide primers 5885 (5'-TCAGACGAGGCCTCC3') and 91167 (5'-TCTTAAGGTCATTGCAGACG-3'), complementary to exon 4 and exon 7 sequences, respectively, were used to generate the PCR product for restriction enzyme analysis. The mutated LDL receptor cDNA was then ligated into the Xba I and Sac I sites of the SV40 promoter-based expression vector pSVL for use in the transient transfection experiments.

COS cells were transfected with the normal and mutant LDL receptor cDNAs using the liposome method and Lipofectamine reagent. Cells were assayed for the binding of increasing concentrations of 125I-labeled LDL 48 to 72 hours later at 4°C. The amount (ng/dish) of 125I-LDL bound at each ligand concentration by cells mock-transfected with the expression vector pSVL was subtracted from the value obtained with a given plasmid. This value was divided by the amount of LDL receptor DNA per dish, as assayed by slot-blot hybridization, to normalize for transfection efficiency.

Determination of the Activity of LDL Receptors on Lymphocytes
The functional LDL receptor assay was carried out using the technique of Cuthbert et al28 as described previously.21 In this assay, the activity of the LDL receptor on mitogen-stimulated lymphocytes is evaluated in vitro under conditions in which endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis is blocked by lovastatin to render cellular proliferation dependent on exogenous LDL. Curves indicating cell proliferation rate are plotted against increasing concentrations of LDL and used to compare individual samples. A blood sample from the proband was obtained while she was pregnant and on colestipol only.

Assays for Serum Lipid Levels and Lipoprotein Kinetics
Serum lipoproteins were separated by ultracentrifugation into density classes, as described in the Manual of Laboratory Operations of the Lipid Research Clinics Program,29 to VLDL, IDL, LDL, and HDL. Serum and lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride and apoprotein B were measured automatically using commercial kits.

For the kinetic studies, 50 mL of fasted EDTA plasma was drawn, from which autologous LDL was separated by serial preparative ultracentrifugations and iodinated with 125I by a modified iodine–monochloride method.30 31 Three days before the injection, subjects started to take peroral potassium iodide. Approximately 1 mg of the labeled LDL was mixed with 5% human serum albumin, filtered, and injected intravenously. The total amount of radioactivity did not exceed 20 µCi. After the injection, blood samples of 10 mL were collected and counted for 14 days. The die-away curves were constructed for 125I–LDL. FCR for LDL was determined using a two-pool model.32 TR was determined by multiplying FCR by the pool size, which was calculated by multiplying the apolipoprotein B plasma concentration by plasma volume, which in turn was estimated to be 4.5% of body weight.

Statistical Analyses
Differences in the mean serum lipid levels in mutation carriers and noncarriers were analyzed using the Student's t test.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Serum Lipid Levels in Family Members
The pedigree of the family is illustrated in Fig 1Up. Moderate hypercholesterolemia (>6 mmol/L) was present in several members of the family, and the proband had severe hypercholesterolemia. Achilles tendon xanthomatosis was present in the proband and subject I-6 (Fig 1Up) but in no other family members. The occurrence of coronary heart disease was suspected in subjects I-3 and I-4 and documented in the proband (II-5). Serum HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels were essentially normal in all the family members (Table 1Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Serum Lipid Levels in the Family Members

Identification of Two LDL Receptor Gene Mutations in the Family
Southern blot analysis of the proband's DNA sample, using a cDNA probe encompassing exons 11 to 17 of the LDL receptor gene and restriction enzyme BamHI, Xba I, or Pvu II, revealed aberrant hybridization signals in each case (data not shown), suggesting the presence of a major rearrangement in the 3' portion of one of her LDL receptor alleles. The hybridization pattern displayed by the proband's DNA was clearly different from that produced by a DNA sample from a heterozygous carrier of the Finnish founder gene FH-Helsinki, which deletes exons 16 and 17 and part of exon 1833 ; overall, Southern blotting data suggested deletion of exons 14 and 15. To demonstrate the exact nature of this mutation, a partial cDNA molecule corresponding to the mutant allele was produced by reverse transcription and PCR amplification of fibroblast RNA from the proband. DNA sequencing showed that exons 14 and 15 were indeed deleted, and there was a direct continuum of the DNA sequence from exon 13 to exon 16, with an apparent maintenance of the reading frame in exons located 3' of the deletion point (Fig 2Down).



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. DNA sequence analysis of the deleted LDL receptor allele of the proband, demonstrating a direct continuation of the cDNA sequence from exon 13 to exon 16.

The deletion eliminating exons 14 and 15 was not found in the DNA samples from the mother or father of the proband (Fig 1Up). Paternity tests using five different polymorphic DNA markers (MCT118, YNZ22, HUMTH, D3S, vWA, and FES) disclosed a paternity index of 3946 corresponding to a 99.97% likelihood of paternity (data not shown). These data demonstrate that this mutation (deletion of exons 14 and 15) arose on a de novo basis.

Because of the severe hypercholesterolemia present in the proband (Fig 1Up), homozygosity for a defect in the LDL receptor gene was initially suspected in her case. Therefore, all 18 exons of the LDL receptor gene were screened using an SSCP technique. An aberrant band shift was disclosed when exon 5 was analyzed using this technique (Fig 3ADown). Direct sequencing of the amplified exon 5 revealed a C to A substitution at nucleotide 768, consistent with a change of the codon 235 from GAC to GAA (Fig 3BDown). This substitution is predicted to substitute glutaminic acid for aspartic acid at position 235, which is located in the sixth cysteine-rich repeat of the ligand-binding domain of the LDL receptor protein.34 The proband was thus considered to most likely represent a compound heterozygote, bearing an Asp235->Glu mutation in one and a deletion of exons 14 and 15 in the other LDL receptor allele (Fig 1Up). Results from the functional LDL receptor studies were consistent with this assumption. Thus, while cells from healthy control subjects proliferated efficiently when the LDL concentration was increased, to overcome the block in cholesterol biosynthesis, close to 1 µg/mL, cells from the proband grew only poorly under the same conditions (Fig 4Down). Our previous studies indicated that the extent of inhibition of cell proliferation by lovastatin was approximately 50% when lymphocytes from heterozygous patients with the FH-Helsinki mutation were examined under similar conditions.21



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Identification of a single-base substitution in exon 5 of the LDL receptor gene of the proband. A, SSCP analysis of exon 5 of the LDL receptor gene. Exon 5 of the LDL receptor gene was amplified from genomic DNA with primers located in the adjacent introns and analyzed on a 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 10% glycerol. Lanes 1 to 2 and 4 to 10, unrelated heterozygous FH patients with no detectable variants in exon 5; lane 3, an aberrant SSCP signal found in subject II-5 (Fig 1Up). B, Partial DNA sequence of exon 5 of the same subject. The individual is heterozygous for a C to A substitution in the third base of codon 235, resulting in an Asp to Glu mutation.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. LDL receptor function in lymphocytes of the proband and three healthy control subjects. The line indicates inhibition of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation by lovastatin as a function of prevailing LDL cholesterol concentration.

Mutation Analysis of the Family Members
All family members of the proband were subsequently screened for the presence of the Asp235->Glu mutation using an assay combining amplification of exon 5 by PCR, followed by digestion of the amplification products with the restriction enzyme NciI. Amplification of the normal exon 5 under the conditions chosen generates a 173-bp DNA fragment that is cleaved into 100- and 73-bp fragments by NciI (Fig 5ADown). The C768->A mutation eliminates an NciI restriction site normally present in exon 5, thus permitting an easy means of mutation detection. The Asp235->Glu mutation was identified in not only the proband but also her mother and four other family members (Fig 1Up). In addition, analysis of an umbilical cord blood sample obtained after delivery of the proband's child revealed that the Asp235->Glu mutation (Fig 5ADown), but not the deletion of exons 14 and 15 (Fig 5BDown), was present in the child, thus unambiguously demonstrating that these two mutations were present in different LDL receptor alleles of the proband.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Analysis of the two different mutations (Asp235->Glu and deletion of exons 14 and15) in the proband and her child. A, Amplification of an exon 5-containing sequence by PCR and electrophoretic analysis of the amplification products without (lanes 1 to 4) or with (lanes 7 to 10) prior digestion with Nci I. Lanes 1 and 7, mother of the proband (I-3); lanes 2 and 8, proband (II-5); lanes 3 and 9, father of the proband; lanes 4 and 10, child of the proband (III-1); lanes 5 and 11, PCR controls (buffer instead of DNA); and lane 6, molecular size markers (starting with 100 bp). Note that under these conditions (2% agarose) the 100- and 73-bp fragments are visualized superimposed. B, Demonstration of the presence of the large deletion (deletion of exons 14 and 15) in the proband only. Lane 1, molecular size marker ({lambda} phage DNA cut with HindIII); lane 2, mother of the proband; lane 3, proband; lane 4, father of the proband; lane 5, child of the proband; and lane 6, PCR control (buffer). The arrow (with an asterisk) shows the position of the 1.8-kb fragment amplified in the sample of the proband (lane 3).

Pedigree analysis demonstrated a suggestive, although not absolute, cosegregation of the Asp235->Glu mutation with moderate hypercholesterolemia (Fig 1Up). Within the older generation examined, the mean serum total and LDL cholesterol levels in the four heterozygous carriers of the Asp235->Glu mutation (7.76±1.46 and 5.89±1.56 mmol/L, respectively) were significantly (P<.05) higher than the corresponding concentrations in their five nonaffected siblings (5.81±0.57 and 3.77±0.54 mmol/L, respectively). Serum lipid levels in the proband were highly variable but were, when measured under drug-free conditions, mostly markedly higher than in a typical heterozygous FH patient (see "Methods").

Thirty unrelated subjects with moderate to severe hypercholesterolemia and 46 unrelated subjects with a clinical diagnosis of FH but without either of the two Finnish founder mutations (FH-Helsinki or FH-North Karelia)35 were screened for the presence of the Asp235->Glu mutation. No additional carrier of this gene was found. The mutation was subsequently designated as FH-Keuruu for the birthplace of the proband's mother.

Expression of the Asp235->Glu Mutant Allele In Vitro
COS cells were transfected with either the wild-type or the C768->A mutated LDL receptor cDNA and subsequently analyzed for binding of 125I-labeled LDL. In each case, increasing concentrations of 125I-labeled LDL demonstrated saturable and specific binding sites for LDL, but the maximal binding capacity in the cells transfected with the mutant cDNA, when normalized to the transfection efficiency, was only approximately 30% to 50% of that of the cells transfected with the wild-type cDNA (Fig 6Down).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Binding of 125I-LDL by COS cells transfected with the normal and mutant LDL receptor cDNA. The results shown are from a representative experiment of four independently performed assays with essentially similar results.

Studies of LDL Kinetics In Vivo in the Family
LDL apoprotein B kinetics was studied in the proband (II-5), her mother (I-3), father, and brother (II-2), as well as in two affected (I-4 and I-6) and one unaffected (I-5) uncles (Fig 1Up, Table 2Down36 ). In the proband, the concentration of LDL apoprotein B was very high, and the LDL cholesterol/LDL apoprotein B ratio was much lower than the corresponding ratio in the other family members and control subjects (Table 2Down). In addition, the proband was characterized by a very low FCR and a high TR of LDL (Table 2Down). There was a trend toward lower FCR and higher TR in the Asp235->Glu mutation carriers than in the noncarriers, but subject I-5, a noncarrier, was an exception to this rule (Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. LDL Apoprotein B Kinetics in the Proband, Her Mother and Father, Other Family Members (Two Carriers and Two Noncarriers of the Asp235->Glu Mutation), and 29 Healthy Middle-Aged Men


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This report describes two hitherto unreported mutations of the LDL receptor gene that both show special features: one (deletion of exons 14 and 15) appears to have arisen on a de novo basis, and the other (FH-Keuruu or Asp235->Glu) is associated with only moderate elevation of serum LDL cholesterol level. When present simultaneously in a compound heterozygous person, these mutations were associated with a clinical phenotype intermediate between a homozygous and a heterozygous FH subject.

There is only one previous report of de novo mutations of the LDL receptor gene. Kotze et al37 described a newly arisen mutant LDL receptor gene with a duplication of 18 bp in exon 4. Although a number of large deletions eliminating exons 14 and/or 15 have been reported in earlier studies,2 the particular type of deletion characterized in this article has not been described previously, even if its exact mechanism cannot be determined. A transcript molecule encoded by the mutant allele was present in fibroblasts of the proband, but there is no proof that a corresponding protein product, lacking the 108 amino acids encoded by exons 14 and 15, is present on the cell membrane. In addition, we cannot exclude the possibility that the deleted gene could code for additional receptor forms derived by alternative splicing of the primary transcript.

During the past few years we have identified 17 different mutations of the LDL receptor gene in Finland.21 23 33 35 38 39 40 Except for the four common mutations (FH-Helsinki, FH-North Karelia, FH-Turku, and FH-Pori), all seem to be present in single families only, and all except one rare mutation (Gly457->Arg or FH New York-2) are unique to the Finnish population.39 The FH-Keuruu (Asp235->Glu) point mutation described here has not been reported previously. The results of our initial screening studies suggest that it is not a common founder gene causing elevated serum cholesterol levels among the Finns. Attempts to search for its presence among moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects of other populations are facilitated by the convenient PCR assay described in this report. We have previously shown that deletion of exon 15 alone (FH-Espoo) is associated with partial deterioration of LDL receptor functioning and a mild form of FH.21

The Asp235->Glu mutation occurs in the sixth cysteine-rich repeat in the ligand-binding region of the LDL receptor protein.34 This mutation is conservative in nature, with substitution of a negatively charged amino acid for another with similar physicochemical characteristics, which may explain the relatively mild phenotypic consequences of this DNA alteration. Expression of an LDL receptor cDNA corresponding to the FH-Keuruu gene in COS cells suggested a loss of approximately 50% to 70% of receptor activity. A mutation chemically identical to the FH-Keuruu mutation but present in a nearby codon (Asp245->Glu or FH Cincinnati-1) is likewise associated with some residual (15% to 30%) receptor activity.2 Interestingly, another point mutation in the same codon as FH-Keuruu, changing aspartic acid to the neutral amino acid glycine (Asp235->Gly or FH Nevers), was found to result in an LDL receptor with only 5% to 15% of activity compared to the normal one.2 Our data do not allow us to attribute deterioration of the FH-Keuruu receptor activity to a binding-defective allele (functional class 3) or transport-defective allele (functional class 2). In fact, most of the point mutations in exons 4 to 6 of the LDL receptor gene were shown to represent class 2B (partial defect in transport between the endoplastic reticulum and Golgi apparatus) mutations.2

Serum total and LDL cholesterol levels in the carriers of the FH-Keuruu mutation were approximately 30% and 50% higher, respectively, than the corresponding levels in noncarriers of the same family. These concentrations in the FH-Keuruu carriers were, however, markedly lower than the corresponding total and LDL cholesterol levels (about 12 and 10 mmol/L, respectively) in heterozygous patients with the two common LDL receptor mutations (FH-Helsinki and FH-North Karelia) studied previously by us.35 In our proband, with two different mutations of the LDL receptor gene, slow catabolic rate of LDL and efficient synthesis of apolipoprotein B seem to explain the very high levels of LDL cholesterol and apoprotein B in serum (Table 2Up). In this subject the ratio of cholesterol to apoprotein B in LDL particles was low (Table 2Up), suggesting that LDL particles were small and dense, which may explain the aggressive behavior of her heart disease. Although the FCRs of the LDL particles of the remaining heterozygous carriers of the FH-Keuruu gene tended to be lower than in noncarriers, these changes were not consistent (Table 2Up).

Until now, analyses of naturally occurring mutations of the human LDL receptor gene have concentrated on DNA alterations resulting in typical severe forms, whether homozygous or heterozygous, of FH. Only a few studies have systematically addressed the possibility of phenotypic variation according to the mutation type of the LDL receptor gene. Studies among young French Canadian patients with homozygous FH indicated that the average plasma cholesterol level was markedly higher and that coronary death was more frequent and occurred at an earlier age in patients with the 10-kb promoter area deletion than in those with the Trp66->Gly point mutation.4 Subtle differences in serum lipid levels and their responses to statin treatment were observed, first, between heterozygous FH patients with different classes of founder mutations (Lebanese, Sephardic, and Lithuanian) in Israel20 and second, between heterozygous FH patients with any of the three founder genes (FH-Afrikaner-1, -2, and -3) in South Africa17 19 22 ; however, within each mutation class cited, serum LDL cholesterol levels were relatively high and in the range of 7.5 to 9 mmol/L. Recently, a single-base substitution at the proximal Sp1 binding site of the LDL receptor gene promoter was reported to be associated with only moderately elevated serum cholesterol levels, but the patient still had two myocardial infarctions at a young age.41 The Finnish "mild" LDL receptor mutations, the FH-Espoo characterized previously by us21 and the FH-Keuruu described here, appear to show an even lower degree of phenotypic expression, with the mean serum LDL cholesterol level in heterozygotes in the range of 6 to 7 mmol/L. At the full extreme of the end toward mild mutations of the LDL receptor gene, Gudnason et al42 showed that the relatively common Ala370->Thr polymorphism of the LDL receptor does not result in measurable differences in the LDL receptor function in vitro and is associated with only marginal variation of serum LDL cholesterol levels in vivo.

In conclusion, the present work, along with previous studies addressing genotype-to-phenotype relationships in FH, shows that the mutation type of the LDL receptor gene may have profound influences on in vivo LDL receptor functioning. The significance of subtle LDL receptor mutations as determinants of serum LDL cholesterol variation at the population level still remains an issue requiring further research.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
FCR = fractional catabolic rate
FH = familial hypercholesterolemia
HMG-CoA = 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A
PCR = polymerase chain reaction
SSCP = single-strand conformation polymorphism
TR = transport rate


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by research grants from the Medical Council of the Finnish Academy, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, the University of Helsinki, the Paulo Foundation, the Paavo Nurmi Foundation, and the Finnish Heart Association. We thank Kaija Kettunen for expert technical help.

Received March 18, 1996; accepted October 9, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Familial hypercholesterolemia. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease, 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1989:1215-1250.
  2. Hobbs HH, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Molecular genetics of the LDL receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat. 1992;1:445-466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Sprecher DL, Hoeg JM, Schaefer EJ, Zech LA, Gregg RE, Lakatos E, Brewer HB. The association of LDL receptor activity, LDL cholesterol level, and clinical course in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism. 1985;34:294-299.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Moorjani S, Roy M, Torres A, Betard C, Gagne C, Lambert M, Brun D, Davignon J, Lupien P. Mutations of low-density-lipoprotein-receptor gene, variation in plasma cholesterol, and expression of coronary heart disease in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Lancet. 1993;341:1303-1306.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Aalto-Setälä K, Gylling H, Helve E, Kovanen P, Miettinen TA, Turtola H, Kontula K. Genetic polymorphism of the apolipoprotein B gene locus influences serum LDL cholesterol level in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Genet. 1989;82:305-307.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kotze MJ, Davis HJ, Bissport S, Langenhoven E, Brusnicky J, Oosthuizen CJJ. Intrafamilial variability in the clinical expression of familial hypercholesterolemia: importance of risk factor determination for genetic counseling. Clin Genet. 1993;43:295-299.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Eto M, Watanabe K, Chonan N, Ishii K. Familial hypercholesterolemia and apolipoprotein E4. Atherosclerosis. 1988;72:123-128.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Gylling H, Aalto-Setälä K, Kontula K, Miettinen TA. Serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol level and cholesterol absorption efficiency are influenced by apolipoprotein B and E polymorphism and by the FH-Helsinki mutation of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:1368-1375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hill JS, Hayden MR, Frohlich J, Pritchard PH. Genetic and environmental factors affecting the incidence of coronary artery disease in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:290-297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Berglund L, Wiklund O, Eggertsen G, Olofsson SO, Eriksson M, Linden T, Bondjers G, Angelin B. Apolipoprotein E phenotypes in familial hypercholesterolemia: importance for expression of disease and response to therapy. J Intern Med. 1993;233:173-178.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ferrieres J, Sing CF, Davignon J, Lussier-Cacan S. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: sex-specific effects. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1553-1560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Tonstad S, Leren TP, Sivertsen M, Ose L. Determinants of lipid levels among children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in Norway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1009-1014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sass C, Giroux L-M, Ma Y, Roy M, Lavigne I, Lussier Cacan S, Davignou J, Minnich A. Evidence for a cholesterol-lowering gene in a French-Canadian kindred with familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Genet. 1995;96:21-26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Pimstone SN, Gagne SE, Gagne C, Lupien PJ, Gaudet D, Williams RR, Kotze M, Reymer PWA, Defesche JC, Kastelein JJP, Moorjani S, Hayden MR. Mutations in the gene for lipoprotein lipase: a cause for low HDL cholesterol levels in individuals heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1704-1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Vuorio AF, Ojala J-P, Sarna S, Turtola H, Tikkanen MJ, Kontula K. Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: the influence of the mutation type of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor gene and PvuII polymorphism of the normal allele on serum lipid levels and response to lovastatin treatment. J Intern Med. 1995;237:43-48.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Sun X-M, Patel DD, Webb JC, Knight BL, Fan LM, Cai HJ, Soutar A. Familial hypercholesterolemia in China: identification of mutations in the LDL-receptor gene that result in a receptor-negative phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:85-94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kotze MJ, De Villiers WJS, Steyn K, Kriek JA, Marais AD, Langenhoven E, Herbert JS, Graadt Van Roggen JF, Van der Westhuyzen DR, Coetzee GA. Phenotypic variation among familial hypercholesterolemics heterozygous for either one of two Africaner founder LDL receptor mutations. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:1460-1468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gudnason V, Day INM, Humphries SE. Effect on plasma lipid levels of different classes of mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1717-1722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Jeenah M, September W, Graadt van Roggen F, de Villiers W, Seftel H, Marais D. Influence of specific mutations at the LDL-receptor gene locus on the response to simvastatin therapy in Afrikaner patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 1993;98:51-58.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Leitersdorf E, Eisenberg S, Eliav O, Friedlander Y, Berkman N, Dann EJ, Landsberger D, Sehayek E, Meiner V, Wurm M, Bard JM, Fruchart JC, Stein Y. Genetic determinants of responsiveness to the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin in patients with molecularly defined heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1993;87:III-35-III-44.
  21. Koivisto PVI, Koivisto U-M, Kovanen PT, Gylling H, Miettinen TA, Kontula K. Deletion of exon 15 of the LDL receptor gene is associated with a mild form of familial hypercholesterolemia: FH-Espoo. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:1680-1688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Graadt van Roggen JF, van der Westhuyzen DR, Coetzee GA, Marais AD, Steyn K, Langenhoven E, Kotze MJ. FH Afrikaner-3 LDL receptor mutation results in defective LDL receptors and causes a mild form of familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:765-772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Aalto-Setälä K, Koivisto U-M, Miettinen TA, Gylling H, Kesäniemi A, Savolainen M, Pyörälä K, Ebeling T, Mononen I, Turtola H, Viikari J, Kontula K. Prevalence and geographical distribution of major LDL receptor gene rearrangements in Finland. J Intern Med. 1992;231:227-234.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Orita M, Suzuki Y, Sekiya T, Hayashi K. Rapid and sensitive detection of point mutations and DNA polymorphisms using the polymerase chain reaction. Genomics. 1989;5:874-879.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Leitersdorf E, Tobin EJ, Davignon J, Hobbs HH. Common low-density lipoprotein receptor in the French Canadian population. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1014-1023.
  26. Casanova J-L, Pannetier C, Jaulin C, Kourilsky P. Optimal conditions for directly sequencing double-stranded PCR products with Sequenase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:4028.[Free Full Text]
  27. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156-159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Cuthbert JA, East CA, Bilheimer DW, Lipsky PE. Detection of familial hypercholesterolemia by assaying functional low-density lipoprotein receptors on lymphocytes. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:879-883.[Abstract]
  29. Manual of Laboratory Operations: Lipid and Lipoprotein Analysis. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1974:51-59. Lipid Research Clinics Program. US Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare publication 75-628.
  30. McFarlane AS. Efficient trace-labeling of proteins with iodine. Nature. 1958;182:53.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Bilheimer DW, Eisenberg S, Levy RI. The metabolism of very lowdensity lipoproteins, I: preliminary in vitro and in vivo observations. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972;260:212-221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Matthews CME. The theory of tracer experiments with 131I-labeled plasma proteins. Phys Med Biol. 1957;2:36-53.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Aalto-Setälä K, Helve E, Kovanen PT, Kontula K. Finnish type of low density lipoprotein receptor gene mutation (FH-Helsinki) deletes exons encoding the carboxy-terminal part of the receptor and creates an internalization-defective phenotype. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:499-505.
  34. Südhof TC, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Russell DW. The LDL receptor gene: a mosaic of exons shared with different proteins. Science. 1985;228:815-822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Koivisto U-M, Turtola H, Aalto-Setälä K, Top B, Frants RR, Kovanen PT, Syväneu AC, Kontula K. The familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)-North Karelia mutation of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene deletes seven nucleotides of exon 6 and is a common cause of FH in Finland. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:219-228.
  36. Miettinen TA, Gylling H, Vanhanen H, Ollus A. Cholesterol absorption, elimination and synthesis related to LDL kinetics during varying fat intake in men with different apoprotein E phenotypes. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:1044-1052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Kotze MJ, Theart L, Peeters A, Langenhoven E. A de novo duplication in the low density lipoprotein receptor gene. Hum Mutat. 1995;6:181-183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Koivisto U-M, Palvimo J, Jänne OA, Kontula K. A single-base substitution in the proximal Sp1 site of the human low density lipoprotein receptor promoter as a cause of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:10526-10530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Koivisto U-M, Viikari JS, Kontula K. Molecular characterization of minor gene rearrangements in Finnish patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: identification of two common missense mutations (Gly823->Asp and Leu380->His) and eight rare mutations of the LDL receptor gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:789-797.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Koivisto U-M, Kontula K. A novel deletion/insertion mutation in the low density lipoprotein receptor gene as a cause of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat.. 1996;8:326–332.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Sun X-M, Neuwirth C, Wade DP, Knight BL, Soutar AK. A mutation (T-45C) in the promoter region of the low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor gene is associated with a mild clinical phenotype in a patient with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:2125-2129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Gudnason V, Patel D, Sun X-M, Humphries S, Soutar AK, Knight BL. Effect of the StuI polymorphism in the LDL receptor gene (Ala370 to Thr) on lipid levels in healthy individuals. Clin Genet. 1995;47:68-74.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. F. Vuorio, H. Turtola, and K. Kontula
Neonatal Diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Newborns Born to a Parent With a Molecularly Defined Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 1997; 17(11): 3332 - 3337.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koivisto, U.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Kontula, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koivisto, U.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Kontula, K.