Articles |
From the Departments of Medicine, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (A.R., C.P., J.R.P.), and the University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (H.D., F.W.A.).
Correspondence to Josef R. Patsch, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G), turning codon 57 (TAT) of exon
2 into a stop codon (TAG) and abolishing a, XcmI restriction
site. Digestion of directly amplified CETP cDNA from the patient with
XcmI indicated the exclusive presence of CETP cDNA
containing the mutation. Analysis of the corresponding region
of the CETP gene indicated the patient to be heterozygous for the
nonsense mutation at codon 57, a finding that can only be explained by
the presence of a null allele in addition to the allele with
the nonsense mutation. The combination of TG intolerance of uncertain
cause, together with CETP deficiency due to a novel mutation, produced
the paradoxical constellationhigh levels of HDL
cholesterol (172 mg/dL) associated with a high postprandial
lipemia of 1460 mg triglycerides/dL.8 hoursand provided
further insight into the role of CETP as mediator between pools of
triglycerides and cholesteryl esters in plasma.
Key Words: HDL cholesteryl ester transfer protein hyperalphalipoproteinemia mutations triglycerides
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In frank hypertriglyceridemia HDL
cholesterol and HDL2 levels are
low.13 HDL2 levels are also
low in individuals with normal fasting but high postprandial
triglyceride levels.15 Cause and
effect for this inverse relationship between fasting or postprandial
triglyceride levels and HDL2 have
been elucidated;16 for example, immunological
blockage of LPL in the chicken is followed by immediate accumulation of
TG-rich lipoproteins in plasma, which in turn is followed by a
continuous reduction of HDL cholesterol and the replacement
of large HDL particles by smaller, denser HDL.17
Another example is heterozygous LPL deficiency in man due to the amino
acid exchange of Gly188
Glu, which can be associated with normal
TG-levels in the postabsorptive state but, postprandially, is
accompanied by pronounced and prolonged lipemia. For this condition the
term "TG-intolerance" was coined in order to stress the fact that
normotriglyceridemia is maintained in the unchallenged
postabsorptive state while
hypertriglyceridemia surfaces in the
postprandial state of challenge.18 TG intolerance
is associated with characteristic alterations in lipoprotein
composition and distribution, namely, high levels of CE-enriched VLDL
and IDL, small dense LDL, and low HDL cholesterol with
decreased levels of HDL2 enriched with TG. These
steady-state lipoprotein characteristics supplement the condition of TG
intolerance to what was called the "syndrome of TG
intolerance."18 The evidence from experimental
and genetic deficiency of LPLthe key enzyme for TG
catabolismclearly demonstrates that the cause for the inverse
relationship between triglyceride concentrations and HDL
levels is the metabolism of TG and that the effect is the
HDL level.
The relationship between TG and HDL (and the other lipoproteins) is mediated by CETP, and its deficiency could provide the opportunity to further elucidate the role of CETP for this relationship. In the absence of the action of CETP, even high postprandial TG levels would be expected to fail to leave marks on HDL2 and the other lipoproteins. We discovered such a constellation; we now report on a patient with TG intolerance who paradoxically displayed in her plasmabecause of CETP deficiency due to a novel mutationextremely high HDL2 levels and large buoyant LDL.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasma Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Apolipoproteins
Plasma was collected after an overnight fast into vials
containing EDTA to give a final concentration of 1 mg/mL.
Cholesterol and triglycerides were measured in
plasma by enzymatic methods.19 20 Quantification
of HDL, HDL2, and HDL3
cholesterol included the same enzymatic methods in
combination with a stepwise precipitation procedure to remove
apoB-containing lipoproteins and HDL2,
respectively.21 22 Plasma apoA-I and apoB were
quantified by automated colorimetric and turbidimetric
procedures, respectively (Böhringer Mannheim, Germany). ApoE
phenotype was determined by isoelectric focusing of delipidated
plasma, Western blotting, and
immunostaining.23
An aliquot of postabsorptive plasma was subjected to rate zonal ultracentrifugation in a Ti-14 rotor (Beckman Instruments) under conditions to isolate VLDL, IDL, and LDL.24 25 A second aliquot was used to isolate HDL2 and HDL3, respectively.24 25 Zonal rotor fractions were analyzed for protein,26 phospholipids,27 total and unesterified cholesterol, and triglycerides (Böhringer Mannheim). Stokes diameters of LDL and HDL subfractions were estimated after electrophoresis under nondenaturing conditions on 2.5% to 16% and 4% to 30% polyacrylamide gradient gels (Isophore, Isolab Inc.), respectively.28 29
Postprandial Lipemia
Immediately after sampling of postabsorptive plasma, the patient
ingested a liquid fatty meal described in detail
previously.18 Briefly, the test meal contained
per meter square of body surface area 65.0 g fat with a P/S ratio of
0.06, 24 g carbohydrate, 4.75 g protein, and 240 mg
cholesterol. Triglycerides were determined 0,
2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours postprandially. The magnitude of postprandial
lipemia was quantified by two methods as (1) the maximal postprandial
triglyceride increase that represents half the sum
of the two highest postprandial triglyceride values minus
the fasting triglyceride value,15 and
(2) as the area under the postprandial TG curve normalized to the
fasting level.15
CETP Mass and Activity
Cholesteryl ester transfer activity was determined as described
by Groener et al30 using a substrate-independent
isotope assay that measures radiolabeled cholesteryl ester transfer
from exogenous LDL to exogenous HDL, mediated by a fraction of the
patient's fasting plasma from which VLDL and LDL had been removed
before the assay procedure. Radiolabeling of exogenous LDL was
performed according to the method of Morton and
Zilversmit.31 CETP mass was quantified using an
immunoradiometric assay employing a polyclonal
antibody.32
LPL and HL Activity
The patient was injected in the postabsorptive state
intravenously with 2,280 U/m2 heparin
(Novo Industri A/S) to release LPL and HL into the circulation, and
postheparin plasma was collected after 10 minutes.
Measurements of LPL activity and HL activity were performed as
described.18
Amplification of DNA and mRNA Fragments
Isolation of genomic DNA and total RNA from mononuclear cells of
the patient's blood was performed according to standard
procedures.33 34 For amplification of DNA
fragments PCR was performed in 10 mmol/L Tris (pH 9.0, 25°C),
50 mmol/L KCl, 15 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1%
gelatin, and 1% Triton X-100, supplemented with corresponding
quantities of dNTPs, primers, and Taq DNA polymerase (Böhringer
Mannheim). Long- range PCR was performed with ELONGASE Enzyme Mix (Life
Technologies) according to the user's manual. The whole CETP gene was
amplified in two overlapping fragments using primers F2 and R1
(fragment D,
12 kB), as well as primers F3 and R2 (fragment E,
12
kB), respectively. Primers for amplification and sequence
analysis of all CETP exons with adjacent intron sequences had
been synthesized according to published sequence data (accession
numbers M32992 and J02898, EMBL + GenBank Release 82) or as
described7 and are listed in Table 1
.
|
Reverse transcriptase PCR was performed in 25 µL of 50 mmol/L
Tris (pH 8.3), 75 mmol/L KCl, 3 mmol/L
MgCl2, 10 mmol/L dithiothreitol,
supplemented with 5 nmol of each dNTP, 5 U of
RNAse-inhibitor from human placenta (Böhringer
Mannheim), 15 pmol of primer R3, and 12 U of Avian Myeloblastosis Virus
Reverse Transcriptase (Promega). Total RNA isolated from mononuclear
cells from blood according to the guanidinium thiocyanic acid
method34 was used as template. The whole reverse
transcription reaction was subjected to the first PCR using primers F1
and R3. Using aliquots of the first PCR as templates, two overlapping
fragments of the CETP cDNA were amplified using primers F2 and R1
(fragment A, 864 bp), as well as primers F3 and R2 (fragment B, 799bp),
respectively. To amplify a shortened fragment designated fragment A'
(469 bp) reverse transcription was performed using primer R1, followed
by PCR using primers F2 and Ex 4/5. Primers for amplification and
sequence analysis were synthesized according to published
sequence data (accession numbers M32992 and J02898, EMBL + GenBank
Release 82) or as described7 and are listed in
Table 1
.
All amplification reactions were performed in 0.5 mL polypropylene microtubes (Treff) with an overlay of Paraffin liquid (Merck) in a TRIO-Thermoblock (Biometra). XcmI digestion of PCR fragments was performed after the user's manual (New England Biolabs). Amplified cDNA and genomic DNA fragments were subcloned into pUC18 for sequence analysis or were sequenced directly. Manual DNA sequencing was performed with Sequenase Version 2.0 DNA Sequencing Kit (Amersham) according to the user's manual. Direct sequencing of PCR products was performed with Thermo Sequenase fluorescent labeled primer cycle sequencing kit with 7-deaza-dGTP (Amersham) using Automated DNA Sequencer 2000 L (LI-COR Inc.).
Cell Transfection and CAT Assays
HepG2 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10%
FCS, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL
streptomycin, at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% air.
One day before the transfection procedure cells were plated in
MultiWell plates (9.6 cm2/well, Falcon).
Transfection was performed using the Lipofectin reagent (Gibco BRL,
Life Technologies) as described by Felgner.35
Twenty-four hours after transfection extracts of cells were prepared
and subjected to analysis for CAT
activity.36 Plasmids pBLCAT3 (without promoter)
and pBLCAT2 containing the herpes simplex virus TK promoter were used
as negative and positive control of transfection,
respectively.37
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Zonal ultracentrifugal analysis showed an excessively
high lipoprotein peak within the elution volume range of
HDL2 (Fig 1
, I, B).
The exact peak elution volume was only 100 mL as opposed to 120 mL to
130 mL for typical HDL224
suggesting that the "HDL2" of patient M.Y.
was of somewhat lower density and larger size than typical
HDL2. Indeed, nondenaturing gradient gel
electrophoresis showed a mean Stokes diameter of 12.5 nm compared to
10.5 nm of typical
HDL2.38
|
Zonal ultracentrifugal analysis for apoB-containing
lipoproteins25 showed a very small LDL peak
consistent with the low LDL cholesterol level of 83
mg/dL plasma (Table 2
). This LDL peak displayed a high degree of
heterogeneity with at least three subpopulations (Fig 1
, I, C). Heterogeneity of LDL in CETP deficiency has
been described before.39 This finding was evident
not only on zonal ultracentrifugation but also on
gradient gel electrophoresis. Here, the patient's LDL displayed a
major peak with a median Stokes diameter of 26.8 nm, and a minor peak
with an even larger diameter of 28.3 nm. Thus, LDL of patient M.Y.
showed an overall larger size than what has been described for LDL
pattern A.40
Compositional data on lipoprotein fractions are summarized in Table 3
. VLDL and IDL contained TG as their
major core lipid. LDL contained mostly CE. The two HDL subfractions,
HDL2 and HDL3, contained
almost exclusively CE in their core and only trace amounts of TG.
|
Since high HDL2 levels in the postabsorptive
state are associated with small postprandial triglyceride
elevations,15 we were anxious to find out how
patient M.Y. with her extremely high plasma levels of
HDL2 would react to our standard oral fat load
test. Instead of the expected attenuated postprandial rise of
triglycerides, M.Y. showed a very pronounced lipemia with a
maximal TG increase of 280 mg/dL and the unusually large calculated
postprandial lipemia of 1460 mg TG/dL plasma.8 hours (Fig 1
, I, A). The
high postprandial lipemia was not caused by reduced activities of HL or
LPL in the patient's plasma, which were 269 mU/mL and 314 mU/mL,
respectively.
The lipoprotein profile, particularly the extremely high levels of large, virtually TG-free HDL2 particles and the lack of the usual reciprocal relationship between HDL2 levels and the magnitude of postprandial lipemia15 pointed to a potential problem with neutral lipid transfer and its major catalyst, CETP. Measurement of CETP mass and activity with our CETP IRMA32 and a specific CETP activity assay30 gave, in repeated measurements, less than 2% of CETP mass concentration and less than 5% of CETP activity of a standard normolipidemic plasma pool.32
To elucidate the molecular cause of the apparent CETP deficiency
we examined the coding sequence of the CETP gene. CETP mRNA of M.Y. was
isolated through reverse transcriptase PCR. As source of the CETP
transcript we used total RNA from mononuclear cells obtained from the
blood of patient M.Y. The CETP mRNA was amplified in two overlapping
fragments, A and B, as described by others.7 Both
fragments appeared to be of the same length when compared to the
corresponding fragments of a control subject. Sequence analysis
of fragment A revealed a point mutation (T
G) in codon 57 of exon 2
turning the codon for tyrosin (TAT) into a stop-codon (TAG) (Fig 2
).
|
The mutation abolished one of two XcmI restriction sites of fragment A,
ie, the one at position 603, leaving the other at position 653
unchanged. XcmI digestion of fragment A amplified directly from total
RNA clearly indicated the presence of the XcmI site at position 653 and
the absence of the one at position 603 (Fig 3
). This result indicates that the entire
CETP cDNA material that we were able to amplify and isolate contained
the point mutation at codon 57 of exon 2. Synthesis of any functional
CETP appeared to not take place because we could not detect any of a
correct CETP mRNA in patient M.Y.
|
To confirm the point mutation observed in the CETP mRNA of M.Y.,
we analyzed the corresponding region of the CETP gene. For this
purpose, a fragment of the CETP gene containing exon 2 and the adjacent
intron sequences was amplified through PCR using as template genomic
DNA isolated from mononuclear cells (Fig 4A
). Digestion of this fragment,
designated fragment C in Fig 4
, indicated that M.Y. was heterozygous
for the point mutation at codon 57 (Fig 4B
).
|
In considering the results depicted in Figs 3
and 4
, one could argue
that amplification of the CETP cDNA encoded by the allele not
containing the mutation in exon 2 was not possible because of a
mutation in the target sequence of the oligonucleotide
R3 used for RT. Therefore, primer R1, located in exon 9, was employed
alternatively for reverse transcription. Primers F2 and Ex4/5 were used
for subsequent PCR amplification leading to the synthesis of a shorter
fragment A, denoted as fragment A' (469 bp). Restriction
analysis of fragment A' with XcmI clearly showed that we were
again only able to isolate a CETP-cDNA fragment containing the mutation
in exon 2.
Another possibility for our not finding the second allele at the
level of cDNA was that a defective promoter prevented transcription of
the second allele. Therefore, we analyzed the 5' region of
the CETP gene of patient M.Y. upstream to position -360. This was
performed by amplification of the corresponding fragment using genomic
DNA as template, subcloning into the reporter plasmid
pBLCAT3,37 and transfection into HepG2 cells
known to produce CETP in vitro. This fragment of M.Y. lead to the same
level of transcription of the reporter gene as the corresponding
fragment of a control (Fig 5
). On direct
sequencing of the amplified PCR product two deviations from the
published sequence were found,41 a transition
(A
T) at -309 and an insertion of an additional A into a sequence of
5 A's at -270 to -266 to make it 6 A's at -271 to -266. However,
these deviations were found also in the CETP promoter of a control
subject with normal CETP mass and activity.
|
To examine the CETP gene structure of both alleles of M.Y. we
isolated the CETP-gene adopting the technique of long-range PCR using
the same primers as for amplification of CETP cDNA but employing
genomic DNA as template. PCR with primer pairs F2-R1 and F3-R2 resulted
in fragments of about 12 kB in size containing complete exons 1 to 8
(fragment D) and 9 to 16 (fragment E), respectively in Fig 6
. Restriction analysis of these
fragments showed the same restriction pattern as
described41 and as seen by analysis of
the corresponding fragments of a control (Fig 6
). Fragment D containing
exons 1 to 8 was used as template for amplification of a smaller
fragment containing exon 2. Only half of this fragment was cut in
restriction analysis with XcmI showing that both alleles of
the CETP gene were amplified in the long-range PCR.
|
As an additional possibility for failing to produce CETP cDNA derived
from the allele not containing the mutation in exon 2, we
considered a splicing defect leading to a truncated or unstable CETP
mRNA. Therefore, all exon-intron boundaries of the CETP gene were
analyzed by sequence analysis. Ten fragments of the
CETP gene containing all exons and adjacent intron sequences were
amplified by PCR and analyzed by direct sequencing (Table 4
). No deviations from the published
sequence were found except the mutation at codon 57 in exon 2, as well
as a silent mutation at codon 270 in exon 9 coding for phenylalanine
(TTC
TTT), both seen only in one allele, respectively.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
As a cause for the mismatch between HDL cholesterol and postprandial lipemia we considered CETP deficiency. Indeed, patient M.Y. displayed CETP deficiency on measurement of both CETP mass and activity. At this point, two questions arose: (1) what was the molecular defect causing CETP deficiency, and (2) is the TG-intolerance hypothesis18 correct? If TG-intolerance indeed causes the syndrome of TG-intolerance with all its marks on VLDL, IDL, LDL, and HDL,18 then CETP deficiency should abolish all these marks.
The first question could be answered by examining the patient's CETP cDNA and CETP gene. After amplifying her CETP cDNA only cDNA containing the mutation in codon 57 of exon 2 was found suggesting that synthesis of full-length CETP did not take place. On the genomic level, however, patient M.Y. displayed heterogeneity with respect to the mutation. We interpret these data to suggest the presence of a null allele in addition to the allele containing the point mutation at codon 57. We undertook major efforts to detect the second allele at the level of cDNA by using an alternative primer for RT to exclude a mutation in the target sequence. We feel that artifacts for the subsequent PCR can also be discounted because the same primers used for the procedure on genomic material invariably allowed us to amplify both alleles of the CETP gene.
For the synthesis of correct mRNA to be prevented completely or to be reduced to nondetectable levels several possibilities can be envisioned; one reason could be a mutation in regulatory sequences in adjacent noncoding regions or in intron sequences of the gene. Analysis of the 5'- region of the CETP gene of patient M.Y. to position -360 displayed no sequence deviation when compared to a control with normal CETP mass and activity. As additional reasons for the absence of CETP-cDNA encoded by the second allele rearrangement of the CETP gene as well as mutations causing defective splicing of pre-mRNA or leading to the synthesis of an unstable mRNA would have to be considered. The overall CETP gene structure of both alleles appeared to be intact, as seen by amplification and restriction analysis of two overlapping CETP gene fragments. The presence of a splicing defect is unlikely, since by sequence analysis of all exons and exon-intron boundaries only one silent mutation was found in one allele altering codon 270 in exon 9 from TTC to TTT.
Potential causes for the manifestation of the null allele other than those mentioned above are rather difficult to identify, especially those involving unstable mRNA. Nevertheless, the exclusive presence of CETP cDNA containing the nonsense mutation at codon 57 is in agreement with the total lack of activity and mass of CETP in the patient's plasma.
The second question we set out to answer, ie, regarding the
validity of the TG intolerance hypothesis and the crucial role of CETP
for completing TG intolerance to the full syndrome, was answered
clearly. In patients heterozygous for LPL deficiency, a paradigm of TG
intolerance,18 postprandial lipemia is
pronounced. These individuals not only display impaired
triglyceride tolerance but, associated with it, a typical
fasting lipoprotein constellation adding to what we termed "the
syndrome of impaired TG tolerance."18 This
syndrome includes cholesterol enriched VLDL and IDL, high
IDL levels, small dense LDL particles (pattern B), and low HDL
cholesterol due to low levels of HDL2
particles enriched with TG.18 Recently, another
mutation in the LPL gene causing low HDL2 was
described.42 Our patient M.Y. exhibited only TG
intolerance but none of the typical stigmata on
HDL2 or any of the other lipoprotein classes.
Instead, she had CE-poor VLDL and IDL, low IDL levels, large LDL of low
density, HDL particles containing almost no TG and extremely high
levels of HDL2 and even larger less dense HDL
particles. Thus, M.Y. exhibited impaired TG tolerance without any of
the lipoprotein stigmata typical for the syndrome of impaired TG
tolerance (Fig 1
). On the contrary, the lipoprotein profile of M.Y. was
reminiscent of TG "supertolerance" observed with IDDM patients with
pancreas grafts.43 These patients have very
attenuated postprandial lipemia due to high LPL activity caused by
peripheral hyperinsulinemia. They also
have high levels of HDL2, large LDL, and very low
concentrations of VLDL and IDL. Our patient's chimeric
phenotype of TG-intolerance yet with the lipoprotein
characteristics of excellent TG metabolic capacity finds
its explanation in the absence of CETP stressing the eminent role of
CETP as link between the avenues of cholesterol and
triglyceride transport.
TG-intolerance is most likely caused by a variety of factors. Demonstrated reasons include heterozygous LPL-deficiency,18 insulin resistance,44 NIDDM,45 and apoE isoforms.46 Patient M.Y. had no deficiency in LPL or HL activity, she had no NIDDM, and her hypertension was not part of the polymetabolic syndrome. However, she exhibited apoE3/E2-phenotype, which conceivably could have caused or at least contributed to her TG-intolerance. As an additional cause, CETP deficiency itself comes to mind. Generally speaking, when a mediator between pools is not functional and, as a consequence, the size of one pool increases, an increase of the second pool would not be entirely unexpected. If HDL cholesterol rises because of the lack of CETP action, levels of triglycerides, the second reactant of the exchange process, could also rise. CETP deficiency could conceivably contribute to TG intolerance, if only with a second handicap such as an apoE2 allele. Further experiments including postprandial studies in other cases of CETP deficiency could help to shed light on this question.
If CETP-deficiency did not contribute to the TG intolerance of patient M.Y., it provided a fortunate situation for us insofar as only in this way the chimeric phenotype was possible with TG intolerance on one hand and the lipoprotein pattern of TG supertolerance on the other. This situation allowed us to not only report a molecular defect of the CETP gene, not described so far, but also to demonstrate that absence of CETP action prevents the development of the full-blown syndrome of TG intolerance even when TG metabolic capacity is seriously impaired.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 2, 1997; accepted August 4, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Boekholdt, J.-A. Kuivenhoven, N. J. Wareham, R. J.G. Peters, J. W. Jukema, R. Luben, S. A. Bingham, N. E. Day, J. J.P. Kastelein, and K.-T. Khaw Plasma Levels of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein and the Risk of Future Coronary Artery Disease in Apparently Healthy Men and Women: The Prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition)-Norfolk Population Study Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): 1418 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Boekholdt and J. F. Thompson Natural genetic variation as a tool in understanding the role of CETP in lipid levels and disease J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2003; 44(6): 1080 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dachet, O. Poirier, F. Cambien, J. Chapman, and M. Rouis New Functional Promoter Polymorphism, CETP/-629, in Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Gene Related to CETP Mass and High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels : Role of Sp1/Sp3 in Transcriptional Regulation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2000; 20(2): 507 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |