Articles |
From the INSERM-Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit U258 (P.-Y. S., G.P.-B., R.A.) and Laboratory of Haemostasis and INSERM Unit 428 (M.A.-G., P.T., M.A.), Hôpital Broussais, Paris, France.
Correspondence to Dr P.-Y. Scarabin, INSERM - Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit U258, Hôpital Broussais, 96, rue Didot, Paris, France. E-mail epicv{at}hbroussais.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: menopause hormone replacement therapy hemostasis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some specific regimens or doses of estrogen are likely to be thrombogenic. Combined oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism,7 and low-estrogen preparations may still have adverse effects on blood coagulation.8 High-dose conjugated equine estrogens have been shown to be associated with a rise in incidence of myocardial infarction in both men9 and postmenopausal women.2 Several recent case-control studies have showed consistent associations between current users of HRT and an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women.10-12 However, the findings were restricted to women who used oral estrogen alone or combined with progestagens. One of these studies10 stated that only a few women used transdermal therapy, and a nonsignificant increase in the thrombotic risk was found in this subgroup.
There are surprisingly few interventional studies that assess the true effects of HRT regimens on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. Furthermore, the impact of the route of estrogen administration on hemostasis is not well documented. Therefore, we investigated the effects of oral and transdermal estradiol/progesterone regimens on hemostatic variables in a randomized controlled clinical trial.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Participants |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Study Design and Treatments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With a two-sided
=0.05, the study was expected to have a 80%
statistical power to detect a difference between groups of about 1
standard deviation for a normally distributed variable. Based on a
previous study of menopause-related changes in hemostatic
variables,14 it was estimated that sample
size would be large enough to detect relative changes of about 20% and
16% in plasma fibrinogen concentration and factor VII activity,
respectively (eg, absolute difference of about 0.50g/L and
0.17 IU/mL, respectively).
| Informed Consent |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Follow-up and Measurements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With regard to hemostatic tests, venous blood (9 volumes) was collected into siliconized tubes (Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson) containing 0.11 mol/L trisodium citrate (1 volume). Platelet-poor plasma was obtained by two centrifugation steps at 2500g and 12°C for 15 mn. Without delay, aliquots of plasma were transferred to plastic tubes, quickly frozen, and stored at -50°C. At the time of assay, plasma samples were transferred to a water-bath at 37°C for 5 minutes and then handled at room temperature. Baseline and 6-months samples from the same subject were analyzed within the same batch to minimize measurement error. All hemostatic tests were performed within a 1-year period following blood collection.
Fibrinogen was measured according to the method of Clauss15 using Fibrinomat (Biomérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) as reagent. Coagulant factor VII activity (factor VIIc) was assayed in a regular one-stage system using rabbit thromboplastin (Thrombomat, Biomerieux) and factor VII-deficient substrate plasma (Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France). Activated factor VII (factor VIIa) was determined with a clot-based assay using a soluble, recombinant, truncated tissue factor (Staclot FVIIa-rTF, Diagnostica Stago) as described.16 Antithrombin and protein C activities were measured by automated amidolytic method using commercially available kits (Hemolab AT Chrom and Hemolab PC Chrom, respectively, Biomerieux). PAI-1 activity was measured by a two-stage amidolytic method using the Spectrolyse pl (V1 to 1) kit (Biopool, Umea, Sweden). Plasminogen activity was measured using the kit Berichrom plasminogen (Behring, Marburg, Germany). Commercially available kits based on ELISA methods were used for determining factor VII antigen (Asserachrom FVIIag, Diagnostica Stago), prothrombin fragments F1+2 (Enzygnost F1+2 micro, Behring), D Dimer (Fibrinostika FBDP, Organon Teknika, Fresnes, France), von Willebrand factor (Asserachrom vWF, Diagnostica Stago), PAI-1 antigen (Tint Elize PAI1, Biopool), and t-PA antigen (Tint Elize tPA, Biopool). Global fibrinolytic capacity (GFC) was determined with an assay based on the ability of plasma to degrade a standardized fibrin clot at 37°C in the presence of purified t-PA.17 Results were expressed as the amount of D Dimer generated for 1 hour.
Several internal quality control materials were used during the study. A normal plasma pool from 15 healthy sujects was used for PAI-1 antigen, D Dimer, and von Willebrand factor. A single batch of lyophilized control plasmas was used for each of other hemostatic variables. Coag Norm (Diagnostica Stago) and/or Uniplasmatrol Index P (Biomérieux) control plasmas were used for factor VIIc, factor VIIag, fibrinogen, antithrombin, and protein C activities. PAI activity and t-PA antigen control plasma sets (Biopool) were used for PAI-1 activity and t-PA antigen, respectively. Control plasma P (Behring) was used for plasminogen. Plasma controls were available in the factor VIIa and prothrombin fragment 1+2 kits.
All the hemostatic tests were performed in duplicate, and coefficients of variation for laboratory procedures were ranged from 3% (fibrinogen) to 12% (PAI activity).
| Statistical Analysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 1
summarizes the baseline values
for the clinical data among the three randomly assigned treatment
groups. There was no significant imbalance between the groups with
respect to these general characteristics. Table 2
shows the mean changes in sex hormone
level by treatment groups. Both active treatments increased the mean
values of plasma estradiol substantially, with a further rise
associated with the transdermal estradiol regimen, and clearly
decreased the mean levels of FSH. Mean values of E2 and FSH remained at
similar level in untreated group.
|
|
Table 3
gives the values of hemostatic
variables by treatment groups at baseline and after 6 months of
follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups in
baseline levels for the main outcome variables. Highly significant
changes were detected in the oral estradiol group. Mean levels of F1+2
prothrombin fragment and global fibrinolytic capacity increased by
about 15% and 60% respectively, whereas the mean values of
antithrombin, PAI activity, and t-PA antigen decreased by about 10%,
50%, and 20% respectively.
|
Table 4
shows the differences in the mean
changes between the treatment groups; Fig 1
depicts only the significant effects.
Oral but not transdermal estradiol regimen increased mean value of
prothrombin activation peptide (F1+2) significantly and decreased mean
antithrombin activity compared with no treatment. Differences in F1+2
levels between active treatments were significant. The oral estrogen
group was associated with a significant decrease in both mean t-PA
concentration and PAI-1 activity and with a significant rise in GFC
compared with the two other groups. Transdermal estrogen regimen had no
significant effect on PAI-1, t-PA, and GFC levels. There were no
significant changes in mean values of fibrinogen, factor VII, von
Willebrand factor, protein C, fibrin D-Dimer, and
plasminogen between the three groups.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some clotting factors may play an important role in the pathogenesis of CHD.18 Plasma fibrinogen level is a powerful predictor of CHD in men and women.19 Raised factor VII coagulant activity has been found to be associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction.20 Population-based studies consistently showed higher levels of fibrinogen21-25 and factor VII22-24,26 in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women of the same age. Recent cross-sectional data suggested that HRT could lower plasma fibrinogen27-30 and reverse the menopause-related changes in factor VII.17
Our study fails to detect any changes in either plasma fibrinogen or factor VII levels between treatment groups. The extensive postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) in the United States showed recently that placebo resulted in a significantly greater increase in mean fibrinogen than any active treatments.31 In the PEPI trial, HRT was given as continuous conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg per day) alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone (cyclic or consecutive) or cyclic micronized progesterone. The magnitude of the effects was relatively small (0.04 to 0.12g/L), and the number of subjects included in our trial may have not been large enough to detect such differences. One smaller placebo-controlled study did not find any significant changes in fibrinogen among postmenopausal women using cyclic oral estradiol (1 or 1.5 mg per day) combined with nomegestrol acetate.32 Two randomized comparisons failed to detect significant differences in fibrinogen levels between transdermal estradiol (continuous or cyclic 50 µg per day) alone or combined with medroxyprogesterone and oral conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg per day) alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone.33,34 In a recent placebo-controlled study,35 continuous transdermal estradiol (50 µg per day) combined with sequential medroxyprogesterone significantly decreased fibrinogen concentration. All these results are consistent with a small HRT-induced decrease in fibrinogen level or no HRT effect.
With regard to factor VII, conflicting results have been reported. A rise in factor VII has been found in postmenopausal women using unopposed oral conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg per day) or transdermal estradiol33 or oral estradiol valerate (2 mg per day) alone.36 No significant change in factor VII was detected in women receiving opposed cyclic oral estrogen32,34 as well as trandermal estradiol.34 One placebo-controlled study showed that continuous transdermal estrogen (50 µg per day) resulted in decreased factor VII activity.35 Interestingly, a randomized trial reported higher factor VII activity attributable to oral conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg/day) alone compared with estrogen combined with a progestogen norgestrel.37 Our data suggest that opposed oral or transdermal estrogen does not affect substantially factor VII levels. Cross-sectional data recently suggested that HRT could lower activated factor VII.38 Our results do not support this finding.
Antithrombin III and protein C are important inhibitors of coagulation. The present study shows that oral, but not transdermal, estrogen significantly decreases antithrombin activity as reported with oral estradiol (2 mg/day)13,39 as well as conjugated equine estrogen.33,40 No significant change is observed with respect to protein C. A placebo-controlled study reported a significant rise in protein C in postmenopausal women receiving high-dose oral conjugated equine estrogen (1.25 mg per day) but not in those using conventional 0.625 mg dosage.40 Other trials failed to detect any significant changes in proteine C among women receiving oral conjugated estrogen (0.625 mg per day) or transdermal estradiol (50 µg per day) combined or not combined with medroxyprogesterone.33,35
The effects of HRT on markers of hemostatic system activation are not well documented. Our results show higher F1+2 levels in the oral estrogen group than in both untreated and transdermal groups. Consistent with this finding, a dose-dependent increase in mean values of F1+2 and fibrinopeptide A has been reported in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of unopposed conjugated equine estrogen at 0.625 mg or 1.25 mg per day.40 However, transdermal estrogen use was not investigated in this study. Another clinical trial33 reported high F1+2 levels in postmenopausal women using unopposed oral conjugated estrogen (0.625 mg per day). No significant change in F1+2 concentration was detected recently in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cyclic oral estradiol (1 or 1.5 mg per day) combined with nomegestrol acetate, but the sample size was small.32 Reliable assays for F1+2 measurement have been developed to monitor factor Xa action on prothrombin, and we used the basal concentration of this peptide activation as an indicator of hypercoagulable state.41 Elevated plasma F1+2 levels are found during acute thombotic events42 as well as in subjects with increased risk of venous thromboembolism.43 Furthermore, increased levels of plasma F1+2 in men at high risk of myocardial infarction have been recently reported.44
A reduction in fibrinolytic activity attributable to increased PAI-1 activity has recently emerged as a novel putative risk factor for CHD.45 High PAI-1 levels have been reported consistently in postmenopausal women not receiving HRT compared with premenopausal women.46-48 Observational studies suggested an association between HRT and increased fibrinolytic potential,17,30,47,48 but experimental data are scarce. Our study demonstrates that oral, but not transdermal, estrogen/progesterone significantly decreases both PAI activity and t-PA concentration, and significantly increases global fibrinolytic activity. Two clinical trials are consistent with our findings. A fall in PAI-1 activity associated with unopposed oral conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg per day), but not with transdermal estradiol (50 µg per day), has been reported,33 and another study35 showed no significant change in PAI-1 activity in postmenopausal women receiving cyclic or continuous transdermal estradiol (50 µg per day) combined with medroxyprogesterone. In the present study, t-PA antigen was positively correlated with PAI-1 activity and antigen (r>.6, P<.001) as reported.47,48 In addition, t-PA antigen was negatively correlated with global fibrinolytic activity (r=.64, P <.01). Therefore, t-PA antigen assay probably detect circulating complexes of inactive t-PA and PAI-1, and a rise in t-PA antigen may be an indicator of reduced fibrinolysis, which can result in an increased CHD risk.49,50 However, recent data emphasized differences between PAI-1 and t-PA antigen with respect to their biological significance as CHD risk markers.51
Our results show no significant difference in fibrin D Dimer concentrations within and between groups, and no significant correlation was detected between the mean changes in fibrinolytic variables and F1+2 levels. Therefore, the oral estrogen-related changes in fibrinolytic system do not appear as a compensatory effect in response to increased hemostatic system activation. An increased fibrinolytic activity induced by oral estrogen should theorically protect against the atherothrombotic process, but this potential benefit is somewhat puzzling when allowance is made for blood coagulation activation and the clinical relevance of increased fibrinolytic potential in postmenopausal women using oral estrogen remains unclear. However, although no significant change in D Dimer concentration was detected in postmenopausal women using oral estrogen, the pattern of effects on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis is close to those observed in oral contraceptive users.52 It should be emphasized that use of oral contraceptives containing a low dose of ethynil estradiol is still associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.7
The mechanisms underlying the effects of oral estrogen replacement therapy on hemostatic variables remain speculative. It is unlikely that an estrogen-related decrease in the clearance of prothrombin peptide activation will explain the rise in F1+2 levels in women receiving oral estrogen. Oral, but not trandermal, estrogen administration leads to high hormone concentrations in the liver. This so-called first-pass effect may result in impaired hepatic biosynthesis and secretion of a number of proteins that may be responsible for changes in blood coagulation and fibrinolysis.53 These effects may be mediated through estrogen receptors that modulate transcription of target genes.54 With regard to fibrinolytic system, t-PA is mainly released by vascular endothelium, whereas PAI-1 is producted by a number of cells, including hepatocytes and endothelial cells.45 The absence of significant change in vWF levels suggests that estrogen does not alter endothelial function. Therefore, decreased t-PA antigen in women using oral estrogen could be a consequence of low levels of PAI-1 and inactive t-PA/PAI-1 complex. Plasma triglycerides and insulin levels are strongly and positively correlated with PAI-1 activity.45 Oral estrogen use increases triglycerides levels and appears without any substantial effect on insulin levels.31 Therefore, reduction in insulin resistance is unlikely to explain the oral estrogen-induced changes in fibrinolysis.
The effects of progestogens on the hemostatic system is not well documented. Recent data suggested that users of oral contraceptives containing a third-generation progestogen (desogestrel or gestoden) had higher risk of venous thromboembolic disease than did users of the first (norethindrone type) and second (norgestrel group) generations.7 In addition, third-generation oral contraceptives may have more pronounced adverse effects on hemostasis than other preparations.52 However, these new progestogens have not yet been used in current HRT practice. In a recent case-control study,10 there was no significant difference in the risk of venous thromboembolic disease between HRT with estrogen alone or combined with progestogens. Two randomized trials have investigated the effects of estrogen versus estrogen plus progestogen on CHD risk markers. There was little difference between conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg per day) alone and the same regimen of estrogen combined with cyclic norgestrel (150 µg per day) in their lipid and hemostatic effects.37 In the PEPI trial in the U.S.,31 actively treated women were receiving conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg per day) alone or combined with either cyclic or continuous medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg or 2.5 mg per day, respectively) or cyclic micronized progesterone (200 mg per day). There was no significant difference in plasma fibrinogen concentration between active treatments. In our study, the two estrogen/progesterone regimens differed only on the route of estrogen administration. Therefore, natural progesterone is unlikely to explain the oral estrogen-induced changes in the hemostatic system.
Our results appear of great relevance to clinical findings and may have implications for the management of menopause in current medical practice. While it is doubtful that the cardioprotective effect of HRT, if any, might be mediated through favorable changes in coagulation cascade, a hypercoagulable state may explain an increased risk of arterial thrombosis in women who use high dose of oral estrogen.2,3 Furthermore, a rise in the amount of thrombin generated in vivo may account for an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women receiving oral estrogen as recently reported.10-12 Inconclusive results are available with respect to the route of estrogen administration. Among the recent data, only one case-control study showed a nonsignificant increase in the thrombotic risk in women using transdermal therapy, but this finding was based on only five cases of women who were current HRT users.10 Until the results of clinical end-point trials are available,55 our data suggest that indications for oral estrogen should be restricted to postmenopausal women without any increased risk of thrombotic disease, whereas transdermal estrogen appears safe with respect to hemostatic system. Pending the results of other trials, our findings emphasize the potential importance of the route of estrogen administration in prescribing HRT to postmenopausal women, especially to those at high risk of thrombotic disease.
The main limitation of this randomized clinical trial deals with the statistical power. The sample size may not have been large enough to detect small differences in clotting factors between treatment groups, and confidence intervals of estimates are large. Another drawback arises from the menopausal status of the women enrolled in the trial. In some cases, HRT was given in an early stage of menopause, and the effect of treatments on hemostatic variables may have been attenuated. The long-term effects of HRT, as well as the dose of estrogen and the impact of progestins on the hemostatic system, require further investigation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 2, 1996; accepted February 7, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Sitruk-Ware, G. Plu-Bureau, J. Menard, J. Conard, S. Kumar, J.-C. Thalabard, B. Tokay, and P. Bouchard Effects of Oral and Transvaginal Ethinyl Estradiol on Hemostatic Factors and Hepatic Proteins in a Randomized, Crossover Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2074 - 2079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Canonico, E. Oger, G. Plu-Bureau, J. Conard, G. Meyer, H. Levesque, N. Trillot, M.-T. Barrellier, D. Wahl, J. Emmerich, et al. Hormone Therapy and Venous Thromboembolism Among Postmenopausal Women: Impact of the Route of Estrogen Administration and Progestogens: The ESTHER Study Circulation, February 20, 2007; 115(7): 840 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Bushnell, P. Hurn, C. Colton, V. M. Miller, G. del Zoppo, M. S.V. Elkind, B. Stern, D. Herrington, G. Ford-Lynch, P. Gorelick, et al. Advancing the Study of Stroke in Women: Summary and Recommendations for Future Research From an NINDS-Sponsored Multidisciplinary Working Group Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2387 - 2399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hemelaar, J. Rosing, P. Kenemans, M. C. L.G.D. Thomassen, D. D.M. Braat, and M. J. van der Mooren Less Effect of Intranasal Than Oral Hormone Therapy on Factors Associated With Venous Thrombosis Risk in Healthy Postmenopausal Women Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(7): 1660 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh and B.-K. Yoon Controversies regarding hormone therapy: Insights from inflammation and hemostasis Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2006; 70(1): 22 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Q. Purnell, L. B. Bland, M. Garzotto, D. Lemmon, E. M. Wersinger, C. W. Ryan, J. D. Brunzell, and T. M. Beer Effects of transdermal estrogen on levels of lipids, lipase activity, and inflammatory markers in men with prostate cancer J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Straczek, E. Oger, M. B. Yon de Jonage-Canonico, G. Plu-Bureau, J. Conard, G. Meyer, M. Alhenc-Gelas, H. Levesque, N. Trillot, M.-T. Barrellier, et al. Prothrombotic Mutations, Hormone Therapy, and Venous Thromboembolism Among Postmenopausal Women: Impact of the Route of Estrogen Administration Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22): 3495 - 3500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Sowers, K. A. Matthews, M. Jannausch, J. F. Randolph, D. McConnell, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, R. Little, B. Lasley, and R. Pasternak Hemostatic Factors and Estrogen during the Menopausal Transition J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 5942 - 5948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Szymanski, C. M. Kessler, and B. Fernhall Relationship of physical fitness, hormone replacement therapy, and hemostatic risk factors in postmenopausal women J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2005; 98(4): 1341 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|