© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Vascular Permeability Factor Produces Nitric Oxide–Dependent Hypotension
Evidence for a Maintenance Role in Quiescent Adult Endothelium
From the Departments of Medicine (Cardiology), Surgery (Cardiovascular; M.H., J.F.S.), and Biomedical Research, St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Jeffrey M. Isner, MD, St Elizabeth's Medical Center, 736 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02135. E-mail jisner{at}opal.tufts.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Abstract In vitro studies suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor (VEGF/VPF) may stimulate release of nitric oxide (NO) from endothelial cells. To investigate the hemodynamic consequences of recombinant VEGF/VPF administered in vivo, recombinant human VEGF/VPF was administered as a bolus dose of 500 µg to anesthetized (n=6) or conscious (n=5) New Zealand White rabbits, as well as anesthetized rabbits with diet-induced hypercholesterolemia (HC; n=7). Anesthetized Yorkshire farm pigs (no specific dietary pretreatment) were studied before and after receiving 500 µg intravenous (IV; n=5) or intracoronary (IC; n=5) VEGF/VPF. In anesthetized, normal rabbits, mean arterial pressure (MAP) fell by 20.5±1.4% (P<.05 versus baseline) within 3 minutes after IV VEGF/VPF. Pretreatment with N
-nitro-L-arginine caused a
significant inhibition of VEGF/VPF-induced hypotension. In conscious,
normal rabbits, VEGF/VPF produced a consistent though lesser
reduction in MAP. The fall in MAP induced by VEGF/VPF in
anesthetized, HC rabbits (21.5±2.5% from baseline) was no
different from that observed in normal anesthetized rabbits. In
pigs, both IV and IC administration of VEGF/VPF produced a prompt
reduction in MAP. Heart rate increased, while cardiac output, stroke
volume, left atrial pressure, and total peripheral
resistance all declined to a similar, statistically significant degree
in both IV and IC groups. Epicardial
echocardiography disclosed neither global nor
segmental wall motion abnormalities in response to VEGF/VPF. We
conclude that (1) VEGF/VPF-stimulated release of NO, previously
suggested in vitro, occurs in vivo; (2) this finding suggests that
functional VEGF/VPF receptors are present on quiescent adult
endothelium, consistent with a
maintenance function for VEGF/VPF, which may include regulation
of NO; and (3) the preserved response of HC rabbits suggests that
endothelial cell receptors for VEGF/VPF are spared in
the setting of hypercholesterolemia.
Key Words: endothelium • angiogenesis • nitric oxide
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Seminal reports by Leung,1 Keck,2 and Plouet3 identified VEGF/VPF as an endothelial cell mitogen. Because the high-affinity tyrosine kinase receptors for VEGF/VPF, flt4 and flk/KDR,5 6 are limited to endothelial cells, VEGF/VPF has been regarded as endothelial cell–specific. Studies performed in vivo have demonstrated that VEGF/VPF promotes angiogenesis in animal models of limb7 8 and myocardial9 10 ischemia and accelerates reendothelialization after arterial balloon injury.11
To elucidate the mechanisms by which VEGF/VPF may modulate endothelial cell biology, Brock et al12 used fura 2, a Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dye, to monitor changes in [Ca2+]i in suspensions of human endothelial cells. They observed a threefold to fourfold increase in [Ca2+]i associated with an increase in inositol triphosphate in response to VEGF/VPF. While an influx of extracellular Ca2+ appeared to constitute the predominant source of [Ca2+]i, a blunted but reproducible increase in [Ca2+]i was obtained even in the absence of extracellular Ca2+, suggesting that VEGF/VPF-induced [Ca2+]i increase was due to release of Ca2+ from internal as well as extracellular pools.
Evidence that VEGF/VPF-induced increase in
[Ca2+]i was sufficient to stimulate
production of NO was subsequently published by Ku et
al.13 They observed that VEGF/VPF-induced dose-dependent
relaxation of isolated canine coronary arteries could be
abolished by prior endothelium disruption, and/or
pretreatment with L-NMMA. The findings of both Brock et
al12 and Ku et al13 suggested that
VEGF/VPF-receptor binding is associated with tyrosine kinase–mediated
phosphorylation of phospholipase C-
-1, release of
inositol triphosphate from phosphoinositide, a
consequent increase in [Ca2+]i, and
ultimately increased endothelial cell
production of NO. More recently, measurements performed in our
own laboratory have confirmed that application of VEGF/VPF to freshly
excised arterial segments with intact
endothelium results in a dose-dependent increase in the
production and/or release of NO.14
Systemic administration of VEGF/VPF has been considered as a potential alternative to gene therapy for promoting collateral vessel formation in patients with peripheral vascular disease.7 Delineation of the hemodynamic consequences associated with such therapy is therefore of interest. Accordingly, the current series of experiments was performed to investigate the hemodynamic response to VEGF/VPF in two mammalian species. Hemodynamic consequences were characterized specifically under conscious versus anesthetized conditions, after IV versus IC administration, and in a normal versus HC state.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Animal Models
All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of St Elizabeth's Medical Center in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publication 86-23, revised 1985).
Rabbits
New Zealand White rabbits, 3.0 to 3.5 kg in weight (Pine Acre
Rabbitry, Norton, Mass) were fed either normal rabbit chow (n=11) or
rabbit chow enriched with 2% cholesterol (ICN Biomedical,
Cleveland, Ohio; n=7); in the latter case, the duration of the
cholesterol-supplemented diet was 6 months and resulted in
levels of total cholesterol of 1772±221 mg/dL
(mean±SE). After premedication with xylazine, 2 mg/kg, all
cholesterol-fed rabbits, as well as six of the
non–cholesterol-fed rabbits, were anesthetized
before hemodynamic study with a mixture of
intramuscular ketamine, 50 mg/kg, and acepromazine, 0.8
mg/kg. All anesthetized rabbits (and pigs, vide infra)
were allowed to stabilize hemodynamically after
administration of anesthesia and before administration of
VEGF/VPF. The remaining non–cholesterol-fed rabbits were
studied in the conscious state; these rabbits were placed in a
restrainer, and the left ear was anesthetized with 0.25 mL of
1% (vol/vol) lidocaine injected at the base of the ear before
insertion of a 22-gauge catheter (Jelco; Critikon) into the central ear
artery for direct intra-arterial blood pressure
measurements.15 A 25-gauge butterfly needle was also
inserted into the contralateral marginal vein of the right ear for IV
administration of recombinant protein and/or drug.
Pigs
Yorkshire farm pigs (Pine Acre Rabbitry), weighing an average of
30 kg with no specific dietary pretreatment, were all
anesthetized before hemodynamic study with a
mixture of ketamine, 22 mg/kg; acepromazine, 0.5
mg/kg; and atropine 0.05 mg/kg. All pigs were further
maintained with an IV injection of sodium pentobarbital, 20 to 30
mg/kg, and 1% lidocaine in 1 L of normal saline and infused
intravenously for the duration of the
hemodynamic study. Cannulae (20-gauge) were placed in
the marginal vein of the left ear and femoral artery for drug
administration and hemodynamic measurements,
respectively. After a left lateral thoracotomy was performed, the left
pleura was opened, and a small incision was made in the pericardium. A
20-gauge Liddle left atrial silicone elastomer catheter (Research
Medical, Inc.) was then directly inserted into the left atrium for
LAP measurements.
Recombinant VEGF/VPF
After lysis of the E. coli cells by sonication,
centrifugation yielded the 165–amino acid isoform of
VEGF/VPF (VEGF165) protein in an insoluble pellet. The
pellet was washed with 4 mol/L urea in 20 mmol/L
Tris buffer at pH 8 with 5 mmol/L EDTA before
solubilization with 25 mmol/L dithiothreitol. The
extraction was allowed to continue for 2 hours with stirring at 4°C
before centrifugation to remove insoluble bacterial
components. The extract was then dialyzed overnight against 0.4
mol/L NaCl, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8, at 4°C,
during which time the extracted protein was allowed to refold. The
dialyzed, refolded VEGF165 was purified by absorption to
S-Sepharose, and eluted with a gradient of 0.4 to 1.0 mol/L
NaCl. Fractions containing dimeric VEGF165 as determined by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were pooled, and the
protein was further purified by C4 reversed-phase
chromatography in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid with
elution by an acetonitrile gradient. VEGF165 eluted in
approximately 30% acetonitrile. All rhVEGF employed in this study was
documented to be free of endotoxin contamination.
Administration of VEGF/VPF
Previous studies performed in our laboratory7 8
established that the efficacy of VEGF/VPF for stimulating angiogenesis
in a rabbit model of hindlimb ischemia was most
consistently achieved at a dose of 500 µg of
VEGF165; we therefore sought to characterize the
hemodynamic consequences of an apparently
physiologically relevant dose of the
recombinant protein in this species. Because previous experience with
rhVEGF was limited to normal rabbits, we also studied animals with
diet-induced hyperlipidemia (a common finding in
patients with limb ischemia) to determine whether such a
metabolic abnormality altered the
hemodynamic response to VEGF/VPF. For all 18 rabbits,
VEGF/VPF was administered as an IV bolus of 500 µg via the marginal
ear vein.
An additional six rabbits were anesthetized as described above to address specific experimental conditions. Four of these rabbits received normal chow, while the other two were fed a 1% cholesterol diet. (Although all animals in this study, including those fed a 2% cholesterol diet, were outwardly healthy, the additional animals fed a 1% cholesterol diet were included to exclude pathology related to the higher-cholesterol diet.) In these six animals, blood pressure was measured continuously through a central catheter positioned in the abdominal aorta. A second catheter was used to inject albumin, VEGF, or phenylephrine.
Four animals (two normal, two HC) were submitted to the same protocol: first, rabbit serum albumin (0.1%) was injected, after which systemic blood pressure (MAP) was recorded for 15 minutes. VEGF was then injected in increasing doses of 150, 350, and 500 µg, and MAP was monitored continuously. MAP was allowed to return to baseline and stabilize for a minimum of 15 minutes between different injections. In addition, two normal rabbits were used to study the effect of VEGF on MAP after pretreatment with L-NNA or phenylephrine. In these rabbits, 80 mg of L-NNA or phenylephrine at a dose of 10 to 20 µg/min induced a similar 10% to 20% increase in MAP. After blood pressure stabilization, 500 µg of VEGF was administered intravenously with continuous MAP monitoring.
To determine whether there were species-dependent differences in
VEGF/VPF-induced hemodynamic findings and to evaluate
the effect of coronary versus systemic protein administration
on hemodynamic outcomes, we administered VEGF/VPF to
normal pigs. Of the 10 pigs, 5 received an IV bolus of 500 µg,
administered via the ear vein. The remaining 5 pigs received an
identical IC dose administered via the left main coronary
artery.16 (Attempts to administer larger doses (
1.0 mg)
to the pigs produced irreversible hypotension.) For IC administration,
a 6 Fr (JR4: Super Torque Plus; Cordis Corp) Judkins catheter was
introduced into the left carotid artery and advanced to the left
coronary ostium under fluoroscopic guidance. After VEGF/VPF
administration, the syringe and catheter were washed with 3 mL of PBS
containing 0.1% rabbit serum albumin (Sigma).
Administration of L-NNA
L-NNA (Sigma), a competitive inhibitor of NO
synthase,17 was dissolved in 8 mL of PBS at 60°C in
preparation for IV administration. For rabbits, 80 mg of L-NNA was
administered intravenously either immediately before
VEGF/VPF administration or after VEGF/VPF administration at the time
that MAP had reached a nadir; for pigs, the dose of L-NNA was 240
mg.
Hemodynamic Measurements
In rabbits, MAP and HR were measured from the central artery of
the left ear using an intra-arterial (22-gauge) cannula
interfaced with a Gould TA-11 physiological
recorder; for pigs, MAP and HR were measured directly from the
femoral artery; LAP was measured directly from the left atrial
catheter. All signals were digitized at 1 kHz and average values of
each signal were written to the fixed disk of a microcomputer once per
second for subsequent analysis. In pigs, CO was measured using
a COM-2 Cardiac Output Computer (Baxter Healthcare Corp) with a 7.5 Fr
Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter advanced to the pulmonary
artery under fluoroscopic guidance. SV was calculated as CO/HR. TPR was
calculated as (MAP-LAP)/CO.
Epicardial Echocardiography
Epicardial echocardiography was performed in
five pigs receiving IV VEGF/VPF. Short-axis images of the left
ventricle at the midpapillary muscle level were obtained using a 5-MHz
transducer within a sterile sheath, interfaced with a Sonos 500
ultrasound console (Hewlett Packard). A warm sterile saline bath
provided a medium around the exposed heart for ultrasound transmission.
Dynamic short-axis images were recorded continuously on videotape,
beginning at baseline and proceeding through and post-VEGF/VPF
administration.
In Vitro Experiments
To corroborate the in vivo findings, we investigated the
vasomotor response of aortic rings excised at necropsy from New Zealand
White rabbits fed a 1% cholesterol diet for 6 weeks.
Thoracic aortic segments were harvested and prepared as described
previously,14 and then placed in an organ chamber
continuing Krebs buffer aerated with 95% O2/5%
CO2 gas mixture, and maintained at a constant temperature
of 37°C. The aortic rings, 5 mm in length, were mounted using
two L-shaped 30-gauge stainless steel hooks, one of which was immobile
and the other connected by a silk suture to force displacement
transducers (model 7D polygraph, Grass Instrument Company) for
recording isometric tension. Vessels were passively stretched
to 2.0 g isometric force. After 45 minutes of equilibration, the
aortic rings were exposed to 70 µmol/L KCl-solution to
assess maximal depolarization. When the contractile response reached a
plateau phase, the solution in the organ chamber was replaced by fresh
Krebs buffer and again was allowed to equilibrate for 45 minutes in the
presence of 5 µmol/L indomethacin for
complete inhibition of cyclooxygenase and
subsequent production of vasoactive prostanoids. The effect of
VEGF/VPF or ACh was determined after evoking submaximal tone (defined
as approximately 30% to 50% of the maximal inducible tone with KCl)
with norepinephrine before the cumulative addition of
either VEGF/VPF or ACh into the organ bath solution. Data are expressed
as percentage of change in norepinephrine-induced vascular
tone.
Statistical Analysis
All results are expressed as mean±SEM. Repeated measures ANOVA
were used to test statistical significance of percent change over time
as well as to compare the means of the two cholesterol
groups. Student's t tests were used to evaluate percent
change at individual time points versus baseline with Bonferroni
adjustments made for multiple comparisons when needed. For all tests, a
value of P <.05 was inferred to represent
statistical significance.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Rabbits
Fig 1
illustrates the
representative effects of VEGF/VPF and L-NNA on MAP and
HR over time. For anesthetized but otherwise normal rabbits
(n=6, Fig 2), MAP measured at 3 minutes
after IV administration of a 500 µg bolus injection of VEGF/VPF fell
by 20.5±1.4% (P<.05 versus baseline); this fall in MAP
was accompanied by a statistically significant (P<.05)
increase in HR of 23.2±4.7% measured at the same time point. The
nadir of MAP (-47.8±4.6%) occurred 18 minutes after IV VEGF/VPF,
while peak HR (+37.9±9.1%) was observed at 13 minutes. In the absence
of L-NNA (see below), MAP remained persistently reduced for >60
minutes.
|
|
The same dose of VEGF/VPF (500 µg) administered to conscious but
otherwise normal rabbits (n=5) consistently produced a
statistically significant reduction in MAP (Fig 2
), although the
magnitude of this fall in MAP was at no time point as great for the
conscious as the anesthetized rabbits.
MAP and HR were also recorded after administration of VEGF/VPF to
seven unconscious, HC rabbits. Fig 3
shows that within 3 minutes after a bolus injection of VEGF/VPF, MAP
dropped by 21.5±2.5% from baseline (P<.05), while HR at
this time point increased by 6.9±1.8% among HC rabbits. The nadir of
MAP in HC rabbits (-38.1±4.2%) was again observed at 18 minutes
post-VEGF/VPF, while peak HR (9.4±3.1%) occurred at 8 minutes. For
MAP, no significant difference was observed between normal and HC
rabbits groups at any time point. For HR, however, the difference was
significant (P<.05) by 3 minutes (+23.2±4.7% versus
+6.9±1.8% for normal versus HC, respectively). The observed
difference in HR response between normal and HC rabbits is presumed to
be secondary to HC-induced impairment of the baroreceptor
reflex.18 As MAP and HR plateaued, a significant
difference persisted for up to 20 minutes between groups (33.4±9.8%
versus 8.1±4.4% [P<.05] for normal and HC, respectively
at 20 minutes).
|
L-NNA administered post-VEGF/VPF returned MAP and HR to baseline within
12.5 minutes (Fig 1). L-NNA pretreatment caused a significant
inhibition of VEGF/VPF-induced hypotension. The small increase
(
10%) in MAP observed after L-NNA is consistent with
previously reported hemodynamic consequences of NO
synthase inhibitors administered systemically to normal
rabbits.19 The magnitude of this effect would thus be
unlikely to account for the reversal or inhibition of a nearly 50%
reduction in MAP observed after VEGF/VPF in the absence of L-NNA.
An additional group of four rabbits, two normal and two fed with 1%
cholesterol-supplemented diet, was used to determine the
impact of certain other variables. The two rabbits fed a 1%
cholesterol diet were employed to exclude the possibility
that VEGF-induced hypotension was due to systemic toxicity related to
the higher (2%) cholesterol-supplemented rabbits. Indeed,
these rabbits too demonstrated systemic hypotension (mean reduction of
13.9%) after IV administration of 500 µg of rhVEGF165.
Moreover, normal and HC rabbits experienced a similar reduction in MAP
(mean=-16.1%) when VEGF was administered at two lower doses, 350 µg
and 150 µg. In contrast, ACh (1.5 µg ·
kg-1 · min-1)
reduced MAP by 1.8% and 2.1%, respectively, in normal and HC rabbits,
while nitroprusside lowered MAP by 9.2% and 7.6%, respectively, in
the same groups. Rabbit serum albumin (0.1%) produced no
change in blood pressure or HR. Finally, administration of
phenylephrine sufficient to achieve an increase in MAP
similar to that observed with L-NNA pretreatment (Fig 4) failed to inhibit VEGF-induced
hypotension (mean=-35.5%).
|
Pigs
IV or IC administration of VEGF/VPF (n=5 each) produced a prompt
reduction in MAP after a bolus injection of VEGF/VPF (Fig 4). The onset
of hypotension occurred earlier (within 25 seconds) in the pigs than in
the rabbits. Hemodynamic measurements recorded
systematically at 300 seconds disclosed that MAP had dropped
45.8±1.1% from baseline in the IV group and 45.4±3.8% in the IC
group (P<.05 for both versus baseline). Maximum reduction
in MAP was 47.4±3.4% and 47.7±0.8% for IV and IC administration,
respectively. The fall in MAP after IV and IC administration was
similar at all time points (Fig 5). MAP
returned to baseline within 675 seconds regardless of the route of
administration.
|
The reduction in MAP, as well as the remaining
hemodynamic measurements recorded after IV and IC
administration of VEGF/VPF, are summarized in the Table
. After IV VEGF/VPF, the reduction in MAP
recorded at 300 seconds was associated with an increase in HR
(4.5±2.9%) and a decrease in CO (-15.3±10.7%), SV
(-18.2±10.1%), LAP (-21.4±9.0%), and TPR (-35.0±5.1%) (all
P<.05 versus baseline). Similarly, measurements
recorded at the same time point (300 seconds) after IC VEGF/VPF
disclosed that the 45.4±3.8% reduction in MAP was accompanied by
increased HR (9.9±5.8%) and reduced CO (-8.3±7.2%), SV
(-17.5±5.5%), LAP (-31.3±12.7%), and TPR (-39.7±6.1%) (all
P<.05 versus baseline). There was no statistically
significant difference in IV versus IC administration of VEGF/VPF on
any of the aforementioned hemodynamic findings for any
time points.
|
Continuous two-dimensional epicardial echocardiographic
recording performed in five pigs disclosed neither global nor
segmental wall-motion abnormalities on administration of VEGF/VPF (Fig 6). These findings are consistent
with the notion that VEGF/VPF-induced reduction in MAP was due to a
primary reduction in peripheral resistance rather than a
negative inotropic effect.
|
Fig 7 depicts the effects of 240 mg of
L-NNA administered intravenously at the nadir of MAP to
both groups of pigs. By 135 seconds, MAP increased 44.2±10.6% for the
IV group, and 39.6±5.5% for the IC group. A corresponding increase in
TPR (IV=36.9±5.2%, IC=48.8±7.7%) was calculated for the same time
point.
|
In Vitro Experiments
Previous studies from our laboratory14 and
others'13 documented that VEGF/VPF causes vasorelaxation
of aortic rings from normal rabbits, reversible with L-NMMA. In aortic
rings from HC rabbits, VEGF/VPF also produced vasorelaxation,
reversible with L-NMMA (Fig 8), whereas
ACh failed to induce vasorelaxation. Fig 8b summarizes the vasomotor
responses to VEGF/VPF in aortic rings from normal and HC rabbits.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The experiments described in this report extend previous in vitro findings to establish: that (1) the administration of VEGF/VPF to live animals results in a predictable hypotensive response and (2) this hypotensive response can be reversed or prevented by administration of an inhibitor of NO synthase. Thus, these experiments establish that VEGF/VPF induction of NO, previously suggested in vitro, occurs in vivo and is sufficiently robust to have systemic hemodynamic consequences. Hypotension was documented with IC as well as IV administration of VEGF/VPF.
The dose of VEGF/VPF used for rabbits was selected to match the dose we had previously found to be optimal for promoting collateral vessel development in similar-sized rabbits with hindlimb ischemia.7 8 IV administration of this same dose of VEGF/VPF to both rabbits and pigs and IC administration in pigs established that VEGF/VPF-induced synthesis and/or release of NO is independent of both species and route of administration. The latter has potential implications for the use of VEGF/VPF in the treatment of lower extremity and myocardial ischemia. Epicardial echocardiography performed in the larger animal model suggests that the observed reduction in CO was not due to impaired myocardial contractility. Moreover, experiments performed in conscious rabbits demonstrated that while attenuated, VEGF/VPF-induced, NO-mediated hypotension did not result simply from anesthesia-induced abrogation of compensatory reflexes.
These findings are consistent with a preliminary report of similar experiments performed in conscious rats20 and conscious rats treated with fibroblast growth factor-1.15 Findings in the latter study illustrate the potential for a common NO-mediated hemodynamic response among endothelial cell growth factor receptors having intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, according to the paradigm outlined above by Ku et al.13
The hemodynamic response observed in rabbits treated with VEGF/VPF after several months of documented hypercholesterolemia was similar to that observed in normal rabbits. This is consistent with previous work by Cohen et al,21 who established that hypercholesterolemia does not impair the ability of endothelium to elaborate vasodilators, but instead results in selective endothelial cell receptor-mediated dysfunction. Endothelium-dependent relaxations of isolated coronary arteries from HC pigs caused by 5-hydroxytryptamine and substance P, for example, were reduced, while relaxation in response to norepinephrine and the calcium ionophore A23187 were unaffected. Similar findings were subsequently described for the bradykinin receptor in human subjects with hypercholesterolemia.22 The hypotensive response of HC rabbits to VEGF/VPF documented in the present study suggests that the receptors responsible for transducing the NO-dependent effects of VEGF/VPF on endothelial cells are spared in the setting of hypercholesterolemia, although it must be acknowledged that impairment of the response to VEGF/VPF in the HC model cannot be ruled out for the lower (<500 µg) dose range.
The profound hypotensive response observed in both rabbits and pigs under the various conditions outlined above supports the notion of a "survival" or "maintenance/repair" role for VEGF/VPF.23 24 25 26 VEGF/VPF has a circulating half-life of 3 to 5 minutes (N. Ferrara, personal communication, August 29, 1997) and has been previously shown to be bound by both high-affinity (flt and flk/KDR) and low-affinity (heparan sulfate proteoglycans) receptors on endothelial cells. VEFG/VPF receptor expression is widespread during vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the developing embryo.5 Postnatally, both the flt and flk/KDR receptors have been shown to be upregulated at sites of recurrent neovessel proliferation, such as the corpus lutea of the ovary,24 or in pathological tissues,27 particularly in conjunction with hypoxia.28 29
In contrast, expression of VEGF/VPF receptors by quiescent endothelium in the adult has been considered to be typically reduced,5 and in some organs, such as the human adult brain, has been reported to be altogether absent.27 Peters et al,25 however, observed expression of flt mRNA by quiescent endothelium of the adult mouse among multiple organs, including brain, corresponding to a similar pattern of 125I-rhVEGF binding described earlier by Jakeman et al24 ; these studies thus suggested that VEGF might have a function in mature vessels other than mediating vascular growth. The hypotensive response to VEGF/VPF observed in the present study constitutes evidence for the presence of functional VEGF/VPF receptors on quiescent endothelium of the adult rabbit and pig. The fact that this hypotensive response is blocked by a competitive inhibitor of NO synthase suggests further that putative maintenance functions of VEGF/VPF may include regulation of baseline synthesis and/or release of endothelial cell NO. VEGF-induced recovery of disturbed endothelium-dependent flow in the rabbit ischemic hindlimb30 may reflect restored NO production by endothelial cells initially damaged by protracted ischemia in the collateral-dependent limb.
Cuevas et al15 successfully dissociated the mitogenic and hypotensive effects of aFGF, using a truncated form of the protein, mitogenically inactive due to loss of the nuclear translocation sequence, but nevertheless capable of producing hypotension equivalent to that observed with the full-length wild type. The results of the current study do not specifically address the extent to which NO release may contribute to the proliferative and migratory roles of VEGF/VPF, believed to be responsible for stimulating angiogenesis. Leibovich et al31 found that the angiogenic activity of monocytes stimulated with lipopolysaccharide was both L-arginine dependent and inhibited by inhibitors of NO synthase. Preliminary studies from our laboratory indicate that dietary supplementation of L-arginine augments angiogenesis in the rabbit ischemic hindlimb model.32 VEGF/VPF has also been shown to inhibit intimal thickening.11
Finally, as suggested by the designation vascular permeability factor,2 VEGF/VPF increases vascular permeability when assessed by the Miles assay, and as such may have contributed via VEGF/VPF-induced third space effects to hypotension observed in the current experiments. The mechanism responsible for such augmented permeability remains enigmatic. The possibility that NO, previously shown to promote microvascular leakage,33 contributes to this feature of VEGF/VPF deserves further study.
|
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported in part by an academic award in vascular medicine (HL 02824) and grant HL53354 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; the Cora and John H. Davis Foundation, Washington, DC; and the E.L. Wiegand Foundation, Reno, Nev. The authors gratefully acknowledge the generous cooperation of Stuart Bunting, PhD, Bruce Keyt, PhD, and Napoleone Ferrara, MD, of Genentech, Inc, in making available the VEGF/VPF used in this study.
Received December 23, 1996; accepted June 4, 1997.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 1989;246:1306-1309.
2.
Keck PJ, Hauser SD, Krivi G, Sanzo K, Warren T, Feder
J, Connolly DT. Vascular permeability factor, an
endothelial cell mitogen related to PDGF.
Science. 1989;246:1309-1312.
3. Plouet J, Schilling J, Gospodarowicz D. Isolation and characterization of a newly identified endothelial cell mitogen produced by AtT-20 cells. EMBO J. 1989;8:3801-3806.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
deVries C, Escobedo JA, Ueno H, Houck K, Ferrara N,
Williams LT. The fms-like tyrosine kinase, a
receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor.
Science. 1992;255:989-991.
5. Millauer B, Wizigmann-Voos S, Schnurch H, Martinez R, Moller NPH, Risau W, Ulrich A. High affinity VEGF binding and developmental expression suggest Flk-1 as a major regulator of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Cell. 1993;72:835-846.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Terman BI, Dougher-Vermazen M, Carrion ME, Dimitrov D, Armellino DC, Gospodarowicz D, Bohlen P. Identification of the KDR tyrosine kinase as a receptor for vascular endothelial cell growth factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;187:1579-1586.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Takeshita S, Zheng LP, Brogi E, Kearney M, Pu LQ, Bunting S, Ferrara N, Symes JF, Isner JM. Therapeutic angiogenesis: a single intra-arterial bolus of vascular endothelial growth factor augments revascularization in a rabbit ischemic hindlimb model. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:662-670.
8.
Bauters C, Asahara T, Zheng LP, Takeshita S, Bunting
S, Ferrara N, Symes JF, Isner JM. Physiologic assessment of
augmented vascularity induced by VEGF in ischemic rabbit
hindlimb. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H1263–H1271.
9.
Banai S, Jaklitsch MT, Shou M, Lazarous DF,
Scheinowitz M, Biro S, Epstein SE, Unger EF. Angiogenic-induced
enhancement of collateral blood flow to ischemic
myocardium by vascular endothelial growth
factor in dogs. Circulation. 1994;89:2183-2189.
10. Pearlman JD, Hibberd MG, Chuang ML, Harada K, Lopez JJ, Gladston SR, Friedman M, Sellke FW, Simons M. Magnetic resonance mapping demonstrates benefits of VEGF-induced myocardial angiogenesis. Nat Med. 1995;1:1085-1089.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Asahara T, Bauters C, Pastore CJ, Kearney M, Rossow S,
Bunting S, Ferrara N, Symes JF, Isner JM. Local delivery of
vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates
reendothelialization and attenuates intimal hyperplasia
in balloon-injured rat carotid artery. Circulation. 1995;91:2793-2801.
12. Brock TA, Dvorak HF, Senger DR. Tumor-secreted vascular permeability factor increases cytosolic Ca2+ and von Willebrand factor release in human endothelial cells. Am J Pathol. 1991;138:213-221.[Abstract]
13.
Ku DD, Zaleski JK, Liu S, Brock TA. Vascular
endothelial growth factor induces EDRF-dependent
relaxation in coronary arteries. Am J
Physiol. 1993;265:H586–H592.
14.
van der Zee R, Murohara T, Luo Z, Zollmann F, Passeri
J, Lekutat C, Isner JM. Vascular endothelial
growth factor (VEGF)/vascular permeability factor (VPF) augments nitric
oxide release from quiescent rabbit and human vascular
endothelium. Circulation. 1997;95:1030-1037.
15.
Cuevas P, Carceller F, Ortega S, Zazo M, Nieto I,
Gimenez-Gallego G. Hypotensive activity of fibroblast growth
factor. Science. 1991;254:1208-1210.
16. Hariawala M, Horowitz JR, Esakof D, Sheriff DD, Walter DH, Chaudhry GM, Desai V, Keyt B, Isner JM, Symes JF. VEGF improves myocardial blood flow but produces EDRF-mediated hypotension in porcine hearts. J Surg Res. 1996;63:77-82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Moncada S, Higgs A. The
L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl
J Med. 1993;329:2002-2012.
18. Morita H, Nishida Y, Motochigawa H, Watanabe Y, Hosomi H. Depressed baroreflex control of renal nerve activity in conscious WHHL rabbits. Cardiovasc Res. 1988;22:679-685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Rees DD, Palmer RMJ, Moncada S. Role of
endothelium-derived nitric oxide in the regulation of
blood pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:3375-3378.
20. Yang R, Bunting S, Ko A, Keyt B, Jin H. Hemodynamic effects of vascular endothelial growth factor in conscious rats. Circulation. 1995;92:I-659. Abstract.
21.
Cohen RA, Zitnay KM, Haudenschild CC, Cunningham
LD. Loss of selective endothelial cell
vasoactive functions caused by
hypercholesterolemia in pig coronary
arteries. Circ Res. 1988;63:903-910.
22.
Gilligan DM, Guetta V, Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Cannon
RO. Selective loss of endothelial function in
human hypercholesterolemia.
Circulation. 1994;90:35-41.
23. Alon T, Hemo I, Itin A, Pe'er J, Stone J, Keshet E. Vascular endothelial growth factor acts as a survival factor for newly formed retinal vessels and has implications for retinopathy of prematurity. Nat Med. 1995;1:1024-1028.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Jakeman LB, Winer J, Bennett GL, Altar CA, Ferrara N. Binding sites for vascular endothelial growth factor are localized on endothelial cells in adult rat tissues. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:244-253.
25.
Peters KG, deVries C, Williams LT. Vascular
endothelial growth factor receptor expression during
embryogenesis and tissue repair suggests a role in
endothelial differentiation and blood vessel
growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:8915-8919.
26. Shifren JL, Doldi N, Ferrara N, Mesiano S, Jaffe RB. In the human fetus, vascular endothelial growth factor is expressed in epithelial cells and myocytes, but not vascular endothelium: implications for mode of action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:316-322.[Abstract]
27. Plate KH, Breier G, Weich HA, Mennel HD, Risau W. Vascular endothelial growth factor and glioma angiogenesis: coordinate induction of VEGF receptors, distribution of VEGF protein and possible in vivo regulatory mechanisms. Int J Cancer. 1994;59:520-529.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Brogi E, Schatteman G, Wu T, Kim EA, Varticovski L, Keyt B, Isner JM. Hypoxia-induced paracrine regulation of VEGF receptor expression. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:469-476.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Tuder RM, Flook BE, Voelkel NF. Increased gene expression of VEGF and the VEGF receptors KDR/Flk and Flt in lungs exposed to acute or to chronic hypoxia: modulation of gene expression by nitric oxide. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1798-1807.
30.
Bauters C, Asahara T, Zheng LP, Takeshita S, Bunting S,
Ferrara N, Symes JF, Isner JM. Recovery of disturbed
endothelium-dependent flow in the collateral-perfused
rabbit ischemic hindlimb after administration of vascular
endothelial growth factor.
Circulation. 1995;91:2802-2809.
31.
Leibovich SJ, Polverini PJ, Fong TW, Harlow LA, Koch
AE. Production of angiogenic activity by human monocytes
requires an L-arginine/nitric oxide synthase–dependent
effector mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:4190-4194.
32. Asahara T, Bauters C, Wu T, Zheng LP, Chen D, Symes J, Isner JM. Nitric oxide precursor augments angiogenesis and attenuates endothelial dysfunction in collateral circulation in rabbit ischemic hindlimb in vivo. FASEB J. 1996;10:A545. Abstract.
33. Schmidt HHHW, Walter U. NO at work. Cell. 1994;78:919-925.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  P. Bhargava VEGF kinase inhibitors: how do they cause hypertension? Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): R1 - R5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S. Shord, L. R. Bressler, L. A. Tierney, S. Cuellar, and A. George Understanding and managing the possible adverse effects associated with bevacizumab Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2009; 66(11): 999 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Izzedine, S. Ederhy, F. Goldwasser, J. C. Soria, G. Milano, A. Cohen, D. Khayat, and J. P. Spano Management of hypertension in angiogenesis inhibitor-treated patients Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(5): 807 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. W. Alfano, S. H. Leppla, S. Liu, T. H. Bugge, C. J. Meininger, T. C. Lairmore, A. F. Mulne, S. H. Davis, N. S. Duesbery, and A. E. Frankel Matrix Metalloproteinase-Activated Anthrax Lethal Toxin Inhibits Endothelial Invasion and Neovasculature Formation during In vitro Morphogenesis Mol. Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 7(4): 452 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. I. Levy Blood pressure as a potential biomarker of the efficacy angiogenesis inhibitor Ann. Onc., February 1, 2009; 20(2): 200 - 203. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Tongers, J. G. Roncalli, and D. W. Losordo Therapeutic Angiogenesis for Critical Limb Ischemia: Microvascular Therapies Coming of Age Circulation, July 1, 2008; 118(1): 9 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C Kalka and I. Baumgartner Gene and stem cell therapy in peripheral arterial occlusive disease Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2008; 13(2): 157 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Li, M. Stankovic, C. S. Bonder, C. N. Hahn, M. Parsons, S. M. Pitson, P. Xia, R. L. Proia, M. A. Vadas, and J. R. Gamble Basal and angiopoietin-1-mediated endothelial permeability is regulated by sphingosine kinase-1 Blood, April 1, 2008; 111(7): 3489 - 3497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. A. Horvath and Y. Zhou Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization and Extravascular Angiogenetic Techniques to Increase Myocardial Blood Flow Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 733 - 752. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Abraldes, Y. Iwakiri, M. Loureiro-Silva, O. Haq, W. C. Sessa, and R. J. Groszmann Mild increases in portal pressure upregulate vascular endothelial growth factor and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the intestinal microcirculatory bed, leading to a hyperdynamic state Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): G980 - G987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Banyasz, S. Szabo, G. Bokodi, A. Vannay, B. Vasarhelyi, A. Szabo, T. Tulassay, and J. Rigo Jr Genetic polymorphisms of vascular endothelial growth factor in severe pre-eclampsia Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 12(4): 233 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. R. Grover, T. A. Parker, N. E. Markham, and S. H. Abman rhVEGF treatment preserves pulmonary vascular reactivity and structure in an experimental model of pulmonary hypertension in fetal sheep Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): L315 - L321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. H. Rudolfsson, P. Wikstrom, A. Jonsson, O. Collin, and A. Bergh Hormonal Regulation and Functional Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A in the Rat Testis Biol Reprod, February 1, 2004; 70(2): 340 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Chhokar and A. L. Tucker Angiogenesis: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Applications Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2003; 7(3): 253 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Komers and S. Anderson Paradoxes of nitric oxide in the diabetic kidney Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): F1121 - F1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B.C. Kuenen, M. Levi, J.C.M. Meijers, A.K. Kakkar, V.W.M. van Hinsbergh, P.J. Kostense, H.M. Pinedo, and K. Hoekman Analysis of Coagulation Cascade and Endothelial Cell Activation During Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Pathway in Cancer Patients Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2002; 22(9): 1500 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Li, A. K. Ogasawara, R. Yang, W. Wei, G.-W. He, T. F. Zioncheck, S. Bunting, A. M. de Vos, and H. Jin KDR (VEGF Receptor 2) Is the Major Mediator for the Hypotensive Effect of VEGF Hypertension, June 1, 2002; 39(6): 1095 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Burkhoff Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 824 - 824. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Yang, A. K. Ogasawara, T. F. Zioncheck, Z. Ren, G.-W. He, G. G. DeGuzman, N. Pelletier, B.-Q. Shen, S. Bunting, and H. Jin Exaggerated Hypotensive Effect of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, March 1, 2002; 39(3): 815 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. B. Freedman and J. M. Isner Therapeutic Angiogenesis for Coronary Artery Disease Ann Intern Med, January 1, 2002; 136(1): 54 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. S. D. VRIESE, R. G. TILTON, C. C. STEPHAN, and N. H. LAMEIRE Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Is Essential for Hyperglycemia-Induced Structural and Functional Alterations of the Peritoneal Membrane J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2001; 12(8): 1734 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. Epstein, R. Kornowski, S. Fuchs, and H. F. Dvorak Angiogenesis Therapy : Amidst the Hype, the Neglected Potential for Serious Side Effects Circulation, July 3, 2001; 104(1): 115 - 119. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Zachary Signaling mechanisms mediating vascular protective actions of vascular endothelial growth factor Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): C1375 - C1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Epstein, S. Fuchs, Y. F. Zhou, R. Baffour, and R. Kornowski Therapeutic interventions for enhancing collateral development by administration of growth factors: basic principles, early results and potential hazards Cardiovasc Res, February 16, 2001; 49(3): 532 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Zachary, A. Mathur, S. Yla-Herttuala, and J. Martin Vascular Protection : A Novel Nonangiogenic Cardiovascular Role for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2000; 20(6): 1512 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Baumgartner, A. Pieczek, O. Manor, R. Blair, M. Kearney, K. Walsh, and J. M. Isner Constitutive Expression of phVEGF165 After Intramuscular Gene Transfer Promotes Collateral Vessel Development in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Circulation, March 31, 1998; 97(12): 1114 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. B. Whitaker, B. J. Limberg, and J. S. Rosenbaum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 and Neuropilin-1 Form a Receptor Complex That Is Responsible for the Differential Signaling Potency of VEGF165 and VEGF121 J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2001; 276(27): 25520 - 25531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||