Articles |
From the Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry and The John P. Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; the Departments of Bioengineering and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.R.B.); and Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Warner Lambert Co, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.S.N.).
Correspondence to Murray W. Huff, The John P. Robarts Research Institute, 4-16, University of Western Ontario, 100 Perth Dr, London, Ontario N6A 5K8, Canada. E-mail mhuff{at}julian.uwo.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: mRNA HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin apolipoprotein B metabolism kinetics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of cholesterol biosynthesis in the regulation of apoB-containing lipoprotein metabolism is now beginning to be understood. HMG-CoA reductase, an ER protein, catalyzes the rate-limiting, reductive deacylation of HMG-CoA to mevalonate3 4 in cholesterol biosynthesis. Cholesterol and, likely, other oxysterols can inhibit the activity of HMG-CoA reductase.5 6 A class of lipid-lowering compounds, the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, have been shown to interfere with the rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis.7 These compounds are potent LDL cholesterol-lowering agents; however, relative to the LDL response, their ability to reduce TG concentrations is modest. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lower plasma LDL cholesterol by one or a combination of the following mechanisms: (1) enhanced catabolism by upregulation of hepatic LDL receptors, (2) production of an LDL particle that is a better ligand for the LDL receptor, (3) reduced production of LDL apoB due to either decreased secretion of LDL directly into the plasma or decreased conversion of VLDL to LDL. Decreased conversion may be due to either reduced secretion of hepatic VLDL or increased removal of VLDL (and IDL) from the plasma by upregulated LDL receptors.
In vivo evidence for reduced LDL apoB production following treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors has been reported in experimental animals and in human subjects with a variety of hyperlipidemias, as recently reviewed by Thompson et al.8 Other studies have reported no change in LDL apoB production. These differences may reflect the type and dose of statin administered, the methods used to examine apoB kinetics, or possibly subject variability. It has been proposed that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lower plasma VLDL by inhibition of VLDL apoB synthesis. The results of kinetics studies in humans, however, are inconsistent. Vega et al,9 using pravastatin, demonstrated decreased VLDL apoB production in subjects with primary moderate hypercholesterolemia and relatively normal TG concentrations. These findings were consistent with those of Arad et al10 11 using lovastatin in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia. In contrast, Gaw et al,12 using simvastatin or colestipol plus simvastatin,13 found no effect on VLDL apoB parameters in subjects with primary moderate hypercholesterolemia. A direct correlation between the rate of cholesterol synthesis and the rate of VLDL apoB secretion has been demonstrated in normolipidemic subjects by stable isotopic techniques.14 Recently in heterozygous FH subjects and using the same techniques, Watts et al15 found that simvastatin treatment decreased the VLDL apoB absolute secretion rate. This reduction correlated with the change in plasma LDL cholesterol but not with those of TG or mevalonic acid. The effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on VLDL metabolism in animals is also inconsistent. Work from our laboratory (in miniature pigs) showed that lovastatin reduced direct LDL synthesis. No significant change in VLDL apoB metabolic parameters were observed.16 17 The pig shows many aspects of apoB metabolism that are similar to those in nonhuman primates and humans.16 17 18 Simvastatin had no effect on plasma or VLDL TG in FH swine.19 In guinea pigs, treatment with lovastatin had no effect on VLDL or LDL apoB production but did increase hepatic expression of LDL receptors.20 In contrast, using isolated, perfused rat livers, Khan et al21 demonstrated a decrease in VLDL secretion after treatment with lovastatin.
Atorvastatin is a new, synthetic, chiral, tissue-selective inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase.22 23 Clinical trials using atorvastatin in humans have demonstrated marked plasma LDL cholesterol and TG reductions.24 25 26 The mechanism for these significant lipid-lowering effects is unknown. LDL apoB kinetic studies in casein-fed rabbits treated with atorvastatin have shown a decrease in LDL apoB pool size due to a reduction in LDL apoB PR.27 However, whether cholesterol synthesis inhibition by atorvastatin affects the assembly and secretion of apoB-containing lipoproteins is unknown.
Under normal circumstances, sufficient cholesterol is produced for apoB-containing lipoprotein synthesis and assembly. The inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase by a potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor should significantly limit the availability of FC and may also reduce cholesteryl ester for incorporation into VLDL. In the present studies, the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin was used to test the hypothesis that inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis in vivo, with a consequent reduction in the availability of hepatic cholesterol for lipoprotein synthesis, will (1) reduce VLDL apoB secretion into the plasma, (2) reduce the conversion of VLDL apoB to LDL apoB, and (3) reduce LDL apoB direct synthesis.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pigs were studied in pairs, with each pair being same-sex littermates.
Six animals received the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
atorvastatin (Parke-Davis, Ann Arbor, Mich) at a dose of
3
mg/kg body weight per day (80 mg/d) for 21 days prior to
the turnover study. This dose resulted in a 25% to 30% reduction in
LDL cholesterol in a dose-finding study (data not shown).
The dose given is equivalent to the maximum therapeutic dose used in
humans but is
2.6-fold greater than that used in humans when body
weight is taken into consideration.
Atorvastatin is a synthetic inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase with an in vitro IC50 of 7.5 nmol/L for rat liver microsomal HMG-CoA reductase activity.28 The chemical structure of atorvastatin has been reported previously.29 Atorvastatin (calcium salt) was placed in gelatin capsules and, to ensure ingestion, was administered by hand before the daily feeding. The six control animals received a placebo capsule. The atorvastatin was given at 9 AM each day. Each animal received a 590-g ration of diet (B.W.S. Hog Grower, B-W Feed and Seed Ltd) supplemented with lard, unsalted butter, and safflower oil (1:0.6:0.2), thereby generating a final polyunsaturated to monounsaturated to saturated fatty acid ratio of 1:1:1. Cholesterol (Fisher Scientific) was added to the diet to a final concentration of 0.1% (0.2 mg/kcal). This diet provided 34% of calories as fat, 49% as carbohydrate, and 17% as protein.
Lipoprotein Turnover Studies
Lipoprotein turnover studies were performed essentially as
described previously,16 18 30 with the addition of an
intravenous bolus of [3H]leucine. VLDL (Sf 20
to 400) and LDL (Sf 0 to 12) were isolated from plasma (100 to 150 mL)
obtained after a 24-hour fast and subsequently radiolabeled with
131I and 125I, respectively. All labeled
lipoproteins were autologous. Radiolabeling was performed using the
iodine monochloride technique.18 Lipoproteins were
sterilized by the addition of gentamicin sulfate (100 mg/mL) and
checked for pyrogenicity and sterility. Of the total VLDL
radioactivity, <2% was free iodine, 19% to 32% was bound to lipid,
and 25% to 38% of the protein-bound label was bound to apoB. Of the
total LDL radioactivity, <1% was free iodine, 14% to 27% was
bound to lipid, and 80% to 90% of the protein-bound label
was bound to apoB. After a 24-hour fast, each animal received 20
µCi 131I-VLDL apoB, 15 µCi 125I-LDL apoB,
and 2.5 mCi L-[4,5-3H]leucine (Amersham
Canada Ltd; specific activity, 155 Ci/mmol) given as a bolus by the
indwelling catheter. After injection, blood samples (20 mL) were
collected into tubes containing disodium EDTA at 0.083, 0.25, 0.5,
0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours.
The pigs received no food but had free access to water until the
12-hour sample on day 1 and 36-hour sample on day 2, at which time they
received half their daily ration and either atorvastatin or placebo.
Animals were given their full daily ration and either atorvastatin or
placebo after the 48-, 72-, 96-, and 120-hour samples.
As described previously,16 18 VLDL (d<1.006 g/mL), IDL (d=1.006 to 1.019 g/mL), and LDL (d=1.019 to 1.063 g/mL) were separated from plasma. ApoB was isolated from each lipoprotein fraction by isopropanol precipitation. For the 0- to 24-hour samples, the washed apoB pellet was dissolved in 620 µL of 0.1N NaOH. A 250-µL aliquot was counted in a gamma counter (LKB Compugamma) and then assayed for protein content by a modified Lowry procedure to calculate the 131I specific activities. To determine 3H counts, a further 250-µL aliquot was counted in a beta counter (Beckman LS 3801 liquid scintillation system) 8 weeks later, after the 131I counts had decayed to background levels. The plasma concentration of apoB in each lipoprotein was determined by subtracting the protein value of the first precipitation supernatant from the total protein concentration and by a sensitive ELISA. For the ELISA, affinity-purified polyclonal antiserum prepared in rabbits against pig LDL was used as the capture antibody, and an affinity-purified polyclonal apoB antibody conjugated to peroxidase (The Binding Site) was used for detection. o-Phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a substrate for color development, and the absorbance at 450 nm was read using an ELISA plate reader. A pig purified LDL standard (d=1.030 to 1.050 g/mL) was used to calibrate the assay. Samples were diluted prior to analysis. Two controls analyzed with each batch gave between-batch and within-batch coefficients of variation of <5% for both concentrations. VLDL, IDL, and LDL apoB concentrations were constant over the sampling time period.16
Leucine concentrations were determined in deproteinized plasma isolated by a modification31 of the method of Hamilton. In brief, 0.5 mL sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.2, 0.2N Na), 1.0 mL of 9% sulfosalicylic acid, and norleucine (internal standard) were added to 0.5 mL of plasma and centrifuged at 37 000g for 10 minutes. After the supernatant was removed, the precipitate was washed with 0.5 mL of sodium citrate buffer and centrifuged at 37 000g for 10 minutes. The supernatants were combined. Amino acid analyses of the deproteinized plasma were performed on a single-column amino acid analyzer (model 119C, Beckman). The plasma leucine concentration was quantitated by the ratio of peak height to that of the internal standard. The radioactivity of an aliquot of deproteinized plasma was measured to determine the plasma leucine specific activity.
Kinetic Analysis
The turnover data were analyzed by using the
multicompartmental modeling program SAAM II (SAAM
Institute) running on an Pentium-based personal computer. The model
chosen to describe the data is shown in Fig 1
. This model was
simultaneously fit to the three sets of tracer data for all
lipoprotein fractions. This approach permitted the integration of all
tracer data into a single model. Because of the different methods by
which the two iodinated tracers and
[3H]leucine tracee were introduced into the system, the
information contained in each data set helped support different aspects
of the model structure. Fig 1
shows the compartments of the model and
the pathways that connect the compartments within and between
lipoprotein fractions. The model includes compartments to describe the
kinetics of leucine. Although a single compartment is
represented, a forcing function described by the sum of
three exponentials was used to account for plasma leucine kinetics. The
forcing function was used to drive the appearance of leucine tracer
into the different lipoprotein fractions. Two delay compartments were
included in the model to account for the time required for the
synthesis and secretion of apoB into plasma. Plasma VLDL apoB kinetic
data are characterized by compartments 1, 2, and 3. The sum of the
specific radioactivities in each of these compartments equals the
measured apoB specific activity of the VLDL fraction. Upon reinjection
of the 131I-labeled VLDL, it was assumed that the apoB
radioactivity distributed among the three compartments in proportion to
their pool sizes; hence, the apoB specific radioactivity in
compartments 1, 2, and 3 were equal at the time of reinjection.
Compartment 1, which represented most of the mass of the
VLDL apoB fraction, turned over rapidly and accounted for the initial
fall of the 131I-VLDL apoB specific radioactivity curve.
Compartment 2 turned over more slowly than compartment 1 by one order
of magnitude. Compartment 3, which turned over more slowly than
compartment 2, described the terminal slope of the
131I-VLDL apoB specific radioactivity curve. The terminal
slope of the [3H]VLDL apoB radioactivity data, which was
slower than that of 131I-VLDL, represents the
kinetics associated with the recycling of the amino acid precursor
leucine. Plasma IDL apoB specific activity is characterized by two
compartments, 4 and 5. Although the majority of IDL apoB was derived
from VLDL, direct IDL apoB input was required for optimal model fit for
all three tracers. The percentage derived directly was quantitatively
small (<2%), and no significant differences were observed between the
treatment groups. The LDL section of the model is characterized by a
plasma compartment, designated here as compartment 6, and an
extravascular compartment, compartment 7. Although this assumes that
LDL apoB is kinetically homogeneous, it is not possible to
address the question of LDL heterogeneity without
isolating LDL subfractions and/or collecting urine radioactivity data.
125I-urine radioactivity was collected in a previous
study32 ; however, due to high lipid labeling, the urine
radioactivity data could not be used. It was assumed that at the time
of reinjection, all of the 125I-LDL tracer was introduced
into the plasma compartment. In addition, it was assumed that the
irreversible loss of LDL apoB occurred only from compartment 6.
|
Three pathways from the synthesis and secretion compartment are
included in the model. These pathways represent the secretion
of apoB directly into VLDL, IDL, and LDL fractions. The model allows
for the direct removal of apoB from plasma compartments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
and 6: movement from compartment 1 to 2 (VLDL), directly to 4 (IDL),
and directly to 6 (LDL); movement from compartment 2 to 3 (VLDL), to 4
(IDL), and to 6 (LDL); and movement from 4 to 5 (IDL) and to 6 (LDL).
Because compartments 3 and 5 turned over slowly (
0.1
h-1) and represented only small
portions of the VLDL and IDL fractions, it was assumed that the
material in these compartments was directly removed from the plasma. In
each of the studies, the terminal slopes of the VLDL and IDL
specific-activity curves were parallel; therefore, rate constants
k(0,1) and k(0,3) were constrained to be equal.
During the course of the study, aliquots of plasma (taken at time t=0) were spiked with a small aliquot of the 131I-VLDL injected dose. Each spiked sample was then processed with the other plasma samples to determine the amount of radioactivity in apoB in the VLDL, IDL, and LDL fractions. For these studies, the mean distribution of 131I apoB radioactivity in the spiked samples was 94.5±1.5%, 4.1±1.4%, and 1.5±0.6% in the VLDL, IDL, and LDL fractions, respectively. On the basis of the distribution of radioactivity in the spiked samples, the initial conditions (the initial amount of radioactivity in each fraction) were incorporated into the compartmental model. This takes into account (1) any contamination due to incomplete separation by ultracentrifugation and/or (2) any alteration in the reinjected VLDL resulting in an increase in density during the in vitro preparation.
Liver Lipids
Liver lipids were extracted using the method of Folch et
al33 from 1.0-g sections of liver obtained at sacrifice
that had been stored at -80°C.
1
,2
(n)-[3H]Cholesteryl oleate and glycerol
tri[1-14C]oleate (Amersham Canada Ltd) were added to
assess recovery. TG, FC, and TC were quantitated in liver lipid
extracts by using a modification of the method of Carr et
al.34 In brief, a 200 µg/mL triolein standard was
prepared in isopropanol, and 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 32-, and 64-µg
standard solutions were made. A 200 µg/mL
cholesterol standard was prepared in isopropanol, and 1-,
2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, and 32-µg standard solutions were made. Standards
were dried under N2 and 400 µL of chloroform added.
Samples and standards were dried under N2 and 500 µL of a
1% Triton X-100 solution in chloroform added. Each tube was rolled,
thus ensuring that the Triton X-100/chloroform mixture had contacted
all surfaces touched by lipid. The samples and standards were capped
with a marble, left at room temperature for 1 hour, and dried under
N2. Fifty microliters of deionized water was added and each
tube rolled before incubation at 37°C for 15 minutes. TG, TC, and FC
were determined by enzymatic, colorimetric assays using
reagents obtained from Boehringer Mannheim.
RNase Protection Assay for Liver and Intestine ApoB and LDL
Receptor mRNAs
Liver and small-intestine samples obtained at necropsy were
immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80°C
until analysis. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent
(GIBCO BRL). The integrity of the RNA isolated was verified after
agarose gel electrophoresis (1.2%; 2.2 mol/L formaldehyde) by
the appearance of the 18S and 28S RNA bands. RNA content was determined
by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm. Pig-specific cDNA's for apoB
and the LDL receptor, cloned into Bluescript plasmid (kindly provided
by Dr Alan D. Attie, University of Wisconsin-Madison), served as
templates to synthesize antisense RNA probes. These riboprobes were
then used to measure apoB and LDL receptor mRNA in a modification of
the RNase protection solution hybridization assay of Azrolan and
Breslow.35 This assay uses standard RNA that allows
precise quantitation of specific gene transcripts. In brief, a
32P-labeled RNA probe was synthesized using an in vitro
transcription system (Promega) as per the manufacturer's instructions.
Unlabeled cRNA corresponding to the sense DNA strand was prepared for
use as a hybridization standard. Riboprobe (150 pg; 2 to
3x108 cpm/µg) and either sample or standard cRNA (10 to
150 pg) were hybridized overnight at 63°C in 40 µL of hybridization
buffer (80% formamide; 40 mmol/L HEPES, pH 6.7; 0.4
mol/L NaCl; 1 mmol/L EDTA) with 10 µg of yeast
tRNA. Three hundred microliters of digestion buffer (0.3 mol/L
NaCl; 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 5 mmol/L
EDTA) containing RNase A and RNase T1 (Boehringer Mannheim)
were added to each sample and incubated at 34°C for 1 hour. After
incubation, 500 µL of 20% cold trichloroacetic acid and 100 µg of
herring sperm DNA were added to each sample. Samples were placed on ice
for 15 minutes and then filtered using glass fiber filters. Filters
were washed with 7% trichloroacetic acid and dried, and 8 mL of
scintillation fluid was added before counting. mRNA abundance was
quantitated by reference to the curve generated by using the
transcribed hybridization standard. The sample and standard RNAs were
assayed in triplicate, and hybridization was linear to 120 pg of cRNA.
Samples were analyzed in one batch, and within-batch
coefficients of variation of <10% were achieved.
Plasma Cholesterol Distribution
Plasma cholesterol lipoprotein profiles were
determined by the HPGC method of Kieft et al.36 In brief,
lipoprotein separations were performed on a Superose 6HR FPLC column,
determined primarily by size of the lipoproteins. After HPGC, on-line
lipoprotein cholesterol distribution was determined.
Lipoprotein cholesterol was determined from independent TC
determinations and the percent area distribution of the
cholesterol fractions by HPGC. Peak retention times were
used to estimate and compare the relative sizes of the lipoprotein
particles.
Analyses
TC, TG, VLDL cholesterol and TG, and HDL
cholesterol concentrations in the plasma were determined.
VLDL was obtained after ultracentrifugation at
d<1.006 g/mL, and HDL was obtained after
precipitation of other lipoproteins by dextran
sulfateMgCl2. LDL was calculated by difference. TC, TG,
FC, and phospholipid were determined by enzymatic,
colorimetric assays by using reagents obtained from
Boehringer Mannheim. Dietary fatty acid composition was
determined by gas chromatography with a 2-m column (SP
2230, liquid phase; Supelco) on a Varian 6000 gas
chromatograph. Tests for statistical significance of
differences were compared by paired t
test.37 A value P<.05 was considered
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Autologous 131I-VLDL, 125I-LDL, and
[3H]leucine were simultaneously injected into
each control and atorvastatin-treated pig. The kinetic
parameters of apoB were determined from the
simultaneous analysis of all the specific-activity
data by using the model shown in Fig 1
. The kinetic
parameters are summarized in Tables 2
and 3
. A fit of
the model to the apoB-specific radioactivity curves for
131I-VLDL, 131I-IDL, and 131I-LDL
for a representative pair of animals are shown in Fig 2
. A fit of the model to the
apoB-specific radioactivity curves for [3H]VLDL,
[3H]IDL, and [3H]LDL for the same animals
are shown in Fig 3
. In this model,
90% of apoB enters the circulation as VLDL, 5% of the VLDL apoB
flux is converted to LDL (either through the IDL pool or directly
without passing through plasma IDL), and 10% of apoB enters the
circulation directly as LDL.
|
|
|
|
The administration of atorvastatin decreased the VLDL apoB pool size by
29% (P=.002, Table 2
). This was primarily due to a
significant 34% (P=.027) reduction in the VLDL apoB PR,
since the FCR was unchanged. The amount of VLDL apoB converted to LDL
apoB decreased by 34%. Although not statistically significant
(P=.114), conversion was reduced in five of six animals
studied. The flux of apoB cleared without conversion to IDL or LDL was
significantly reduced by 34% (P=.025). Neither the
percentage of VLDL apoB flux converted to LDL nor the percent cleared
directly was affected by atorvastatin treatment. The FCRs for VLDL apoB
direct catabolism [k(0,1), k(0,2), and k(0,3)] and for IDL direct
catabolism [(k(0,4) and k(0,5)] were not significantly affected by
atorvastatin treatment (data not shown). The model allowed us to
determine the production or flux of VLDL apoB that was
converted to LDL without being transported through the plasma IDL pool,
as well as the amount of VLDL apoB converted to LDL via the IDL
fraction. VLDL apoB production converted to LDL directly did
not change; however, VLDL apoB converted to LDL via IDL was decreased
by 36% with atorvastatin treatment (data not shown;
P=.109).
Atorvastatin significantly decreased the LDL apoB pool size by 30%
(P=.0004) (Table 3
). This was primarily due to a significant
22% (P=.004) reduction in the LDL apoB PR, which was
accounted for by the combination of a 34% decrease in LDL apoB derived
from VLDL apoB catabolism (P=.114) (Table 2
) and a 13%
decrease in LDL apoB direct synthesis (Table 3
). Although not
statistically significant, (P=.115), LDL direct synthesis
decreased in five of six animals studied. Total apoB production
into plasma, calculated as the sum of VLDL apoB production plus
LDL apoB direct production, decreased significantly by 34%
(P=.027). Atorvastatin treatment resulted in a
nonsignificant 11% increase in the LDL apoB FCR (P=.095).
The minimal change in the LDL apoB FCR is further demonstrated by
plotting apoBspecific activity curves for LDL after injection of
radiolabeled 125I-LDL as a percentage of the initial
specific activity value (Fig 4
).
|
VLDL and LDL were analyzed for lipid and protein composition;
however, the percent composition was not altered for any of the
parameters measured (Table 4
). Plasma cholesterol
distribution among the lipoprotein classes, as assessed by HPGC, showed
no major changes (Fig 5
). VLDL
cholesterol was significantly decreased by 21% in the
atorvastatin-treated pigs; however, the peak retention time was
unchanged. Although the percent LDL cholesterol was
unaltered, a small but significant increase in the peak retention time
was observed, suggesting that a smaller particle was produced in the
atorvastatin-treated animals.
|
|
Approximately 24 hours after the last dose of ator-vastatin was
administered, the pigs were killed and sections of liver and small
intestine were removed and stored at -80°C prior to
analyses. Hepatic FC, cholesteryl ester, and TG concentrations
were unaltered by atorvastatin treatment (Table 5
). Hepatic apoB mRNA abundance was
decreased by 13% in the atorvastatin-treated animals
(P=.003), whereas intestinal apoB mRNA abundance was
unchanged (Table 6
). Hepatic and
intestinal LDL receptor mRNA abundances were unaltered,
consistent with the unchanged LDL apoB FCR.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present experiments were carried out in miniature pigs fed a fat- and cholesterol-containing diet. The apoB kinetic studies employed radioiodinated VLDL and LDL as exogenous tracers and 3[H]leucine to endogenously label apoB to combine the advantages of both kinetics approaches.42 The results clearly demonstrate that atorvastatin significantly reduces the secretion of apoB-containing lipoproteins into plasma. The major findings were as follows: (1) VLDL apoB secretion rate decreased by 36%, resulting in a 29% reduction in VLDL apoB pool size; (2) LDL apoB PR was significantly decreased by 22%, resulting in a 30% reduction in the LDL apoB pool size; (3) the conversion of VLDL apoB to LDL apoB and direct LDL apoB synthesis were decreased by 34% and 13%, respectively; (4) total apoB secretion decreased by 34%; (5) VLDL and LDL apoB FCRs were unchanged; (6) hepatic and intestinal LDL receptor mRNA abundances were consistent with the unchanged LDL apoB FCR; and (7) hepatic apoB mRNA abundance was significantly decreased by 13%.
Cholesterol metabolism in the liver is complex, with close regulation of both the compartmentalization and cellular concentrations of cholesterol.43 Several functional pools of cholesterol are present in the hepatocyte, including a metabolically active pool, an ACAT substrate pool, and a cholesteryl ester pool.44 The relative contribution of these different pools to the regulation of apoB metabolism, however, remains unclear. Rates of cholesterol biosynthesis, LDL receptor expression, and cholesterol esterification respond rapidly to cellular concentrations of FC.43 The inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase by atorvastatin would be expected to decrease the hepatic FC concentration of the ER. We found no decrease in the hepatic concentrations of either FC or esterified cholesterol. Although microsomal cholesterol was not measured in the present study, it is possible that microsomal cholesterol in a putative regulatory pool44 45 is decreased by atorvastatin treatment. We would suggest that the primary action of atorvastatin is through reduced microsomal cholesterol availability for either lipoprotein surface or as a substrate for ACAT, thereby reducing cholesteryl ester availability for lipoprotein core formation. This is consistent with the idea that the rate of cholesterol synthesis, not total hepatocyte cholesterol content, regulates apoB secretion.15 Our results are consistent with a recent report by Conde et al,46 who demonstrated, using Triton WR-1339 to block VLDL catabolism, that apoB secretion was inhibited by up to 70% in atorvastatin-treated guinea pigs. At doses of atorvastatin similar to those used in the present study (3 mg/kg per day), no significant changes were observed in either hepatic FC or cholesteryl ester, whereas microsomal FC was significantly decreased by 30%.
A number of in vitro studies using HepG2 cells have investigated the role of cholesterol and cholesteryl ester in apoB assembly, synthesis, and secretion. In some studies, as recently reviewed by Ginsberg,39 the modulation of cellular cholesterol and/or cholesteryl ester failed to alter the rate of apoB secretion, whereas contrasting results using the same cell line demonstrated decreased oleate-stimulated apoB secretion with HMG-CoA reductase inhibition. Reasons for this discrepancy are not known but may be due to the use of HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells are defective in mobilizing TG for lipoprotein assembly47 and differ from primary hepatocytes in their response to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.48 Other in vitro and ex vivo models support the concept that apoB secretion is regulated by cholesterol synthesis. The addition of pravastatin to LDL-loaded isolated rabbit hepatocytes decreased apoB secretion.49 Using isolated perfused rat livers, Khan et al21 demonstrated a decrease in VLDL secretion after treatment with lovastatin.
The results of the present study are consistent with other in vivo studies, in that modulation of apoB synthesis and secretion appears to be an important mechanism whereby HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lower the plasma concentration of apoB-containing lipoproteins.9 10 11 15 16 17 32 Earlier in vivo apoB kinetic studies conducted in miniature pigs from this laboratory (using lovastatin) demonstrated that the significant reduction in LDL apoB was due to a decrease in LDL apoB production; primarily LDL apoB direct synthesis.16 17 Similarly in the present study, the primary response to atorvastatin was a decrease in LDL apoB production. Both a decrease in direct LDL apoB production and conversion of VLDL apoB to LDL apoB contributed to this reduction in LDL apoB PR. The latter was due to a marked decrease in VLDL apoB production by atorvastatin. The reason why our previous studies only affected LDL direct synthesis is not readily apparent but may be related to differences in diet, the kinetic models employed, and/or the dose and potency of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor used. In contrast to the present study, during our experiments with lovastatin, the animals were fed a low-fat, cholesterol-free diet and multicompartmental modeling was not used. In addition, the lovastatin dose was 1.2 mg/kg body weight per day. It is possible that lovastatin did not achieve sufficient inhibition of reductase to decrease the regulatory cholesterol pool involved in VLDL assembly and secretion.
The marked reduction in VLDL apoB secretion in the present study may be related to a more sustained inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. In a preliminary report, Naoumova et al50 demonstrated that in FH homozygotes, plasma mevalonate concentrations (an indirect measure of cholesterol biosynthesis) were decreased significantly longer following a single dose of atorvastatin compared with a similar dose of simvastatin. Alternatively, atorvastatin could influence TG and/or phospholipid synthesis in addition to its effect on cholesterol synthesis. Inhibition of TG51 and phospholipid synthesis52 in cultured hepatocytes have been shown to decrease apoB secretion.
The decreased conversion of VLDL apoB to LDL apoB in the present study would appear to be related to the reduced total VLDL apoB production that results in both a decreased conversion to LDL apoB and decreased direct removal of VLDL apoB. The fact that the percentage of total VLDL apoB production converted to LDL apoB or of that removed directly did not change suggests that no major alterations in VLDL composition or LDL receptor activity were responsible for the decreased conversion. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of effect of atorvastatin on VLDL composition, LDL apoB FCR, and LDL receptor mRNA abundance. A small but significant decrease was noted in the percent of plasma cholesterol carried in VLDL in atorvastatin-treated animals; however, VLDL particle size was unaffected.
It is commonly believed that the mechanism whereby HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors decrease LDL cholesterol concentrations is by enhanced catabolism via upregulation of hepatic LDL receptors. Hepatic cholesterol synthesis inhibition would be expected to decrease hepatic cholesterol concentrations, thereby increasing the expression of LDL receptors. Plasma LDL cholesterol and its precursors would decrease consequent to the resulting increase in apoB FCR. Consistent with our previous findings using lovastatin,16 17 no significant effect was seen in the LDL apoB FCR in atorvastatin-treated animals. In addition, the FCR for the direct catabolism of VLDL apoB and IDL apoB was unchanged by atorvastatin treatment. One possible explanation for the lack of effect on LDL apoB FCR would be the synthesis of an LDL particle of altered composition such that it interacts less efficiently with upregulated LDL receptors.53 Other explanations may include (1) the preferential removal of an LDL subfraction with a rapid turnover rate or (2) the use of the single-plasma-pool analysis of the LDL apoB kinetic data. No significant effects were noted on percent composition of plasma LDL for any of the parameters measured or on LDL receptor gene expression in the atorvastatin-treated animals. These results are consistent with the concept that atorvastatin reduces a newly synthesized pool of cholesterol that is required for lipoprotein assembly; a pool not in complete equilibrium with the LDL receptor regulatory pool.54 It is possible that enhanced LDL clearance may become apparent at higher doses of atorvastatin. In guinea pigs, treatment with 20 mg/kg per day of atorvastatin enhanced hepatic microsomal LDL receptor number by 29%.46
How the reduced rate of cholesterol synthesis by atorvastatin regulates the assembly and secretion of apoB-containing lipoproteins within the hepatocyte is not known. Potential regulatory elements for gene transcription exist in both the upstream region and the second intron of the apoB gene.55 56 The relatively stable apoB mRNA concentrations found after modification by a number of factors that result in changes to apoB secretion57 58 59 60 61 are consistent with posttranslational regulation, whereby apoB constitutively synthesized in excess of its requirement for lipid transport is degraded within the cell.62 There is, however, some evidence for the regulation of hepatic apoB mRNA by exogenous VLDL,51 61 amino acids,63 and cholesterol.64 The alterations in apoB mRNA abundance reported in vitro tend to be small, and the physiological significance of these changes remains unclear. More recently, studies by Selby and Yao65 on transfected rat hepatoma (McA-RH777) cell lines expressing recombinant human apoB suggest that mRNA concentrations may influence apoB synthesis and secretion. We found a significant 13% decrease in hepatic apoB mRNA abundance with atorvastatin treatment.
The rate of cholesterol synthesis may affect rates of apoB degradation and/or translocation of apoB across the ER membrane. It has been suggested that the degree of apoB degradation66 67 and rate of translocation determine the fate of newly synthesized apoB.68 A preliminary report in HepG2 cells suggests that atorvastatin increases the rate of intracellular degradation and decreases apoB translocation.69 Whether a similar mechanism(s) occurs in vivo is unknown.
It is not known whether other genes involved in apoB secretion, such as those for ACAT or MTP, or any changes in their enzymatic activities are affected by atorvastatin treatment. Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase have been shown to decrease the activity of ACAT, preventing the esterification of newly synthesized cholesterol.70 71 The concentration of FC substrate in the cell regulates enzymatic activity of ACAT,3 and inhibition of newly synthesized cholesteryl esters catalyzed by ACAT has been shown to decrease apoB secretion in cell culture models69 72 and perfused monkey livers.73 ApoB kinetic studies in miniature pigs demonstrated that the ACAT inhibitor DuP 128 significantly decreased VLDL apoB secretion.30 In monocytes,74 mice,75 and rabbits,76 ACAT expression is regulated by cholesterol availability on at least two levels: (1) mRNA abundance and (2) enzyme activity. Therefore, any intervention that perturbs the ACAT FC substrate pool, such as atorvastatin, may modulate the expression and/or activity of ACAT and hence apoB secretion. In guinea pigs treated with atorvastatin, hepatic microsomal ACAT activity was significantly decreased, which correlated with a reduction in microsomal FC content.46
MTP is postulated to mediate the transfer of TGs and cholesteryl ester to the apoB molecule,77 and recent evidence indicates that MTP is capable of facilitating apoB translocation in addition to its role in mediating delivery of core lipid to apoB.78 79 The promoter for the MTP large subunit contains a modified sterol-response element, and there is evidence in HepG2 cells that MTP expression is modulated by exogenous cholesterol.80 81 Although we did not measure MTP activity in the present study, the reduced apoB secretion by atorvastatin treatment may be the result of decreased MTP expression and/or activity, secondary to reduced cholesterol synthesis.
In conclusion, the inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase by atorvastatin decreases both VLDL and LDL apoB concentrations, primarily by decreasing apoB secretion into the plasma. No evidence was found for the upregulation of LDL receptors. We postulate that atorvastatin reduces cholesterol and possibly cholesteryl ester synthesis below a critical level required for apoB translocation, lipoprotein assembly, and secretion, thereby stimulating the rate of apoB degradation. The decrease in apoB secretion may, in part, be due to a reduction in apoB mRNA abundance, suggesting additional regulation at the level of apoB gene transcription.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 17, 1997; accepted July 15, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|