Articles |
-Tocopherol and All-Racemic
-Tocopherol on LDL Oxidation
From the Center for Human Nutrition (C.J.F., I.J.) and Departments of Internal Medicine (B.A-H., I.J.) and Pathology (S.D., I.J.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.
Correspondence to I. Jialal, MD, PhD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235-9072. E-mail jialal.i{at}pathology.swmed.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tocopherol (AT), the predominant lipid-soluble
antioxidant in LDL. There are scant data on the direct comparison of
RRR-AT and all-racemic (rac)-AT on LDL
oxidizability. Hence, the aim of the present study was to examine
the relative effects of RRR-AT and all-rac-AT on
plasma antioxidant levels and LDL oxidation in healthy persons in a
dose-response study. The effect of RRR-AT and
all-rac-AT at doses of 100, 200, 400, and 800 IU/d on plasma
and LDL AT levels and LDL oxidation was tested in a randomized,
placebo-controlled study of 79 healthy subjects. Copper-catalyzed
oxidation of LDL was monitored by measuring the formation of conjugated
dienes and lipid peroxides over an 8-hour time course at baseline and
again after 8 weeks. Plasma AT, lipid-standardized AT, and LDL AT
levels rose in a dose-dependent fashion in both the RRR-AT
and all-rac-AT groups compared with baseline. There were no
significant differences in plasma, lipid-standardized, and LDL AT
levels between RRR-AT and all-rac-AT
supplementation at any dose comparison. The lag phases of oxidation
were significantly prolonged with doses
400 IU/d of RRR-AT
and all-rac-AT, as measured by conjugated-dienes assay and
at 400 IU/d of RRR-AT and 800 IU/d of both forms of AT by
lipid peroxide assay. Again, there were no significant differences in
the lag phase of oxidation at each dose for RRR-AT when
compared with all-rac-AT. Also, there were no significant
differences in LDL oxidation after in vitro enrichment of LDL with
RRR-AT and all-rac-AT. Thus, supplementation with
either RRR-AT or all-rac-AT resulted in similar
increases in plasma and LDL AT levels at equivalent IU doses, and the
degree of protection against copper-catalyzed LDL oxidation was only
evident at doses
400 IU/d for both forms.
Key Words: RRR-
-tocopherol all-racemic
-tocopherol LDL oxidation
-tocopherol
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Tocopherol (AT), the most active form of vitamin E, is
the predominant lipophilic antioxidant in LDL.11 The most
consistent data with respect to micronutrient antioxidants and
atherosclerosis appear to relate to AT. Several lines
of evidence support an inverse relation between AT and atherogenesis.
Low levels of AT have been shown in epidemiological studies to be
related to an increased frequency of cardiovascular
mortality.12 13 Case-control studies have shown that
patients with angina have lower levels of AT than do normal control
subjects,14 and both men and women in the highest compared
with the lowest quintile have a significantly decreased risk of
coronary artery disease.15 16 Pharmacological
doses of AT have been shown to reduce LDL oxidizability in healthy
volunteers17 18 19 20 21 and in individuals with
diabetes.22 23 In addition, recent research indicates that
AT supplementation in patients with cardiovascular
disease can reduce lesion progression and coronary
events.24 25
The natural source AT consists of only one isomer (RRR-AT), whereas synthetic AT is an equimolar mixture of eight isomers arising from the three chiral centers on the phytyl tail (all-racemic [rac] AT), one eighth of it being RRR-AT. In the liver, RRR-AT is preferentially incorporated into nascent VLDL particle by the 30-kDa tocopherol-transfer protein.26 27 AT supplementation results in its enrichment in LDL, allowing one to assess its biological effect as an antioxidant.17 18 19 20 21 However, there have been few direct comparisons of RRR-AT and all-rac-AT on LDL oxidizability. Reaven and Witztum28 showed that there were no differences between RRR- and all-rac-AT supplementation in hyperlipidemic volunteers on the oxidative susceptibility of LDL. However, these investigators used a single pharmacological dose of 1600 mg/d and acknowledged that differences could be manifested at lower doses. Thus, it is unknown whether lower doses would show any differences in LDL oxidative susceptibility. RRR-AT and all-rac-AT are available for therapeutic purposes as international units (IU). Hence, the objective of the present study was to examine the relative effects of equivalent IU doses of RRR- and all-rac-AT on plasma and LDL AT levels and on LDL oxidation in healthy volunteers at doses ranging from 100 to 800 IU/d.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study subjects were randomly assigned to take either placebo (soybean oil), RRR-AT, or all-rac-AT capsules at dosages of 100, 200, 400, or 800 IU/d for 8 weeks. The capsules were provided by Henkel Corp and prepared after taking into account that the relative activity of RRR-AT is 1.36 times that of all-rac-AT. While the IU dose and milligram equivalents were identical for all-rac-AT, the respective milligram equivalents for RRR-AT for 100, 200, 400, and 800 IU were 73.5, 154, 294, and 588, respectively. A fasting blood sample (180 mL) was obtained at baseline and after 8 weeks of placebo, RRR-AT, or all-rac-AT supplementation for plasma lipid and lipoprotein profiles; plasma AT, ß-carotene, and ascorbate levels; and LDL isolation. Samples for LDL isolation were collected on ice, and plasma was separated by low-speed centrifugation at 4°C. Samples for plasma ascorbate were deproteinized with ice-cold 10% metaphosphoric acid, and the supernatant was purged with N2 and stored at -20°C.21 Plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels were assayed by the Lipid Research Clinics methodology; cholesterol and triglyceride levels were determined enzymatically.21 AT concentrations in plasma and LDL and ß-carotene concentrations in plasma were measured after extraction by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.29 Plasma levels of AT and ß-carotene were lipid standardized as described previously,21 whereas LDL antioxidant concentrations were expressed per milligram protein. Plasma ascorbate levels were measured spectrophotometrically after derivatization with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine.21 Plasma and LDL fatty acid levels (14:0, 16:0, 18:0, 18:1, 18:2, 18:3, and 20:4) were measured by gas chromatography after extraction and transmethylation.21
LDL (d=1.019 to 1.063 g/mL) was isolated by preparative ultracentrifugation in NaBr-NaCl solutions containing 1 mg/mL EDTA as described previously.21 The isolated LDL was extensively dialyzed against three exchanges (4, 4, and 2 L) of saline-EDTA at 4°C for 24 hours, after which the LDL was filtered and protein content measured by the method of Lowry et al.30 After overnight dialysis against metal-free PBS, pH 7.4 (treated with Chelex 100 resin), copper-catalyzed LDL oxidation was undertaken. LDL (200 µg protein per milliliter) was oxidized in a cell-free system with 5 µmol/L copper in PBS at 37°C, and the time course of oxidation was followed for 8 hours.21 At 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 hours, oxidation was arrested by refrigeration and addition of 200 µmol/L EDTA and 40 µmol/L butytated hydroxytoluene.
The indices of oxidation used in this study included measurement of
conjugated dienes and lipid peroxides. The amount of conjugated dienes
formed during oxidation was determined by measuring the absorbance of
LDL against a PBS blank at 234 nm after a 1:4 dilution of the samples
in PBS. Data are expressed as the increase in conjugated dienes over
baseline (
A234 nm).21 The lipid peroxide content of the
LDL formed during oxidation was measured by a modified iodometric
method.31 In brief, 100 µL of LDL was added to 900 µL
of CHOD-iodide reagent and kept at room temperature in the dark for 60
minutes, after which absorbance was read at 365 nm against a reagent
blank.
Oxidation kinetics (lag phase, oxidation rate, and maximum amount of oxidation) were determined for both measures of LDL oxidation. The rate of LDL oxidation was determined from the propagation phase of the time-course curve by using a spline function. The lag phase was obtained by drawing a tangent to the slope of the propagation phase and extrapolating it to the x axis: the lag time constitutes the time interval from zero time to the intersection point.21 The interassay variability for lag phase for conjugated dienes and lipid peroxides for subjects at baseline and after 8 weeks of supplementation with placebo in this laboratory was 8.5% (n=25) and 9.4% (n=17), respectively.
Statistics
Repeated-measures ANOVA models with grouping factors for AT type
and dose were used to assess the response of the parameter
of interest. Because interactions between dose and other factors were
present, a two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA with one grouping
factor (AT type) and one repeated factor (0 versus 8 weeks) was
performed at each dose. Differences in responses from week 0 to week 8
between the two types of AT were assessed with the typexweek
interaction factor (which is equivalent to two-sample t
tests of
). The level of significance for ANOVA was.05. Multiple
comparisons were performed with paired t tests to compare
baseline and 8-week measurements within the RRR-AT or
all-rac-AT groups by using the.025 level of significance to
adjust for multiplicity of testing (Bonferroni correction). Statistical
analysis was performed using bmdp (SPSS Inc). Data are
presented as mean±SD unless otherwise indicated.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Table 3
shows the effect of various doses
of RRR-AT or all-rac-AT supplementation on plasma
and LDL antioxidant levels. Supplementation had no effect on plasma
ascorbate and ß-carotene levels in any group. There were no
significant increases in plasma and LDL AT levels in the placebo group,
in accordance with previous findings.21 28 After
supplementation with RRR-AT or all-rac-AT, there
were significant increases in plasma AT levels and lipid-standardized
AT levels compared with baseline at all doses. Plasma AT levels rose
progressively in both the RRR-AT and all rac-AT
groups: in the RRR-AT group, the median increment over
baseline at 100 IU/d was 68.5% and at 800 IU/d, 175%, while in the
all-rac-AT group, the increments at 100 IU/d and 800 IU/d
were 37.8% and 151%, respectively. Also, no significant differences
were seen in either plasma or lipid-standardized AT levels between
RRR-AT and all-rac-AT supplementation at any dose
comparison (P>.1). LDL AT levels rose in a similar fashion
(Table 3
). However, there was no significant difference between LDL AT
levels in the RRR-ATcompared with the
all-rac-ATsupplemented group at any dose. When the plasma,
lipid-standardized, and LDL AT levels for the entire group that
received RRR-AT (100 to 800 IU/d) was compared with the
entire group that received all-rac-AT (100 to 800 IU/d),
there were no significant differences between the two groups for both
the absolute increments and the percent change (data not shown).
|
The time course of copper-catalyzed LDL oxidation was monitored by
measurement of conjugated dienes and lipid peroxides. From the
time-course curves, the lag phase of oxidation was derived. It has
previously been shown that there is increased LDL oxidizability, as
evidenced by shortening of the lag phase, with major risk factors for
accelerated atherosclerosis, such as diabetes,
hypertension, and chronic renal disease32 33 34 and in
subjects with a preponderance of small, dense LDL who are also more
prone to premature atherosclerosis.35
Also, a significant inverse relation has been shown between the lag
phase of oxidation and clinical
atherosclerosis.36 37 Thus, the lag phase
appears to be a relevant measure of LDL oxidizability. However, while
the lag phase confirms antioxidant activity with AT enrichment of LDL,
it provides no information on the role of aqueous antioxidants in-vivo
or the relevant oxidizing species in vivo. In Table 4
are shown the lag phases for the various
groups, as measured by conjugated dienes and lipid peroxide assays. In
the groups that received placebo, 100 or 200 IU RRR-AT, or
all-rac-AT, there was no significant change in the lag phase
at 8 weeks compared with baseline (Table 4
). For the conjugated-dienes
assay, there were significant increases in the lag phase at 8 weeks for
both the RRR-AT and the all-rac-AT groups that
received 400 and 800 IU/d of AT. The lag phase as measured by lipid
peroxide assay showed a similar pattern. There were significant
increases in lag phase at 800 IU/d for both RRR-AT and
all-rac-AT groups. While there was also a significant
increase in lag phase with 400 IU/d of RRR-AT
(P=.01), the increase in lag phase with 400 IU/d of
all-rac-AT was not significant (P=.04). Also,
there were no significant differences in response to supplementation in
the lag phases of oxidation as measured by conjugated dienes and lipid
peroxide assays at each dose for RRR-AT compared with the
all-rac-ATsupplemented group (Table 4
). However, a two-way
ANOVA of the percent changes for lag phase for conjugated dienes from
baseline to 8 weeks showed a significant increase in the
RRR-AT group compared with the all-rac-AT group
(P=.035). There was no significant difference in percent
change for lag phase for lipid peroxides between the RRR-AT
and all-rac-AT groups. Also, no significant difference was
seen in maximum oxidation or oxidation rate for conjugated dienes and
lipid peroxide assays between RRR-AT and
all-rac-ATsupplemented groups (data not shown).
|
Although the antioxidant activity of AT resides on the chroman ring, we
wanted to determine whether the configuration of the phytyl side chain
had any influence on its antioxidant effect. Thus, the effect of
RRR-AT and all-rac-AT on LDL oxidation was
assessed in vitro after enrichment of plasma with AT and isolation of
LDL. As shown in Table 5
, there were no
significant differences in antioxidant effects of RRR-AT and
all-rac-AT at both concentrations, as determined by
measurement of the lag phase.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
400 IU/d of
all-rac-AT significantly decreases the oxidative
susceptibility of LDL.21 It is interesting to note that a
recent clinical trial showed that RRR-AT in doses
400 IU/d
resulted in a significant reduction in nonfatal myocardial
infarction.25 The main objective of this study was to
compare the effects of supplementation with equivalent IU doses (the
therapeutically available form) of RRR-AT and
all-rac-AT on antioxidant levels and the susceptibility of
LDL to oxidation to ascertain whether both forms of AT had similar
effects. None of the subjects entered into the study reported any side effects with either RRR-AT or all-rac-AT. Several double-blind, controlled supplementation studies with doses ranging from 200 to 1600 IU/d of AT have shown no consistent adverse effects.19 23 28 46 Also, there were no significant differences in plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and fatty acids after 8 weeks of supplementation with RRR-AT or all-rac-AT. In addition, AT supplementation with RRR-AT or all-rac-AT at any of the doses studied did not have any effect on the circulating concentrations of micronutrient antioxidants such as ascorbate and ß-carotene. All of the above findings are in agreement with the literature.17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Plasma, lipid-standardized, and LDL AT levels rose progressively after supplementation with RRR-AT and all-rac-AT. However, there were no significant differences in AT levels between RRR-AT and all-rac-AT supplementation at equivalent IU dosages. This finding is in agreement with the earlier studies of Reaven and Witztum28 and Winklhofer-Roob et al.47 In the former study, the authors showed no significant differences in AT levels and LDL oxidative susceptibility between RRR-AT (n=7) and all-rac-AT (n=8) supplementation (1600 mg/d for 2 months) in 15 mildly hyperlipidemic (10 female and 5 male) volunteers. However, the high dosage of AT used in that study may have "inundated" the physiological system, thereby negating any differences that might have been seen with lower doses. In the latter study, there were no significant differences in plasma AT levels after 6-week supplementation of 31 young cystic fibrosis patients (18 male and 13 female) with 400 IU/d with RRR-AT (n=10) or all-rac-AT in either fat-soluble (n=10) or water-miscible (n=9) forms. However, these authors did not measure LDL AT levels and also did not study any critical antioxidant end points.
The natural form of AT, RRR-AT, is known to be more biologically active than the synthetic all-rac form, with a relative activity 1.36 times that of all-rac-AT as derived from animal bioassays such as the resorption-gestation test in rats.26 48 It appears that the RRR configuration of the phytyl tail is optimal for maximum biopotency. RRR-AT is preferentially secreted into VLDL,26 and this is possibly the function of the hepatic tocopherol-transfer protein. While all-rac-AT is a mixture of eight stereoisomers, the tocopherol-transfer protein in the liver seems to recognize mainly the R conformation of the phytyl tail at the C-2 position. It has previously been shown that the bioavailability of RRR-AT is 1.5 times greater than the all-rac form.49 Based on the above considerations, it appears that those subjects who consumed 100 IU/d of RRR-AT had ingested only 74 mg (100/1.36); for those who were supplemented with 100 IU/d (100 mg) of all-rac-AT, the bioavailability of the ingested AT equated to 66 mg (100/1.5) of RRR-AT. Based on the bioavailability data, the differences between RRR-AT and all-rac-AT at 100, 200, 400, and 800 IU/d in bioavailable milligram equivalents ranged between 10% and 12%. Thus, it is not surprising that while there was trend to higher levels of plasma and LDL AT with RRR-AT than all-rac-AT, given their similar milligram doses based on the bioavailability data, these differences are not significant. In this study, the effects of both RRR-AT and all-rac-AT supplements was similar, but a type II error cannot be ruled-out due to the small sample size. To further explore the direct comparisons of RRR-AT and all-rac-AT, a more powerful study with a sufficiently large number of subjects to detect a small effect is necessary. Conversions of IU to milligrams of ingested AT are difficult to perform, since at a given dose it is unknown how much of each isomer of all-rac-AT appears in plasma. Further, the methodology to measure various chiral forms of AT (gas chromatographymass spectrometry) is tedious, requires relatively large concentrations of AT, and is available in only very few laboratories. Given the large group of subjects studied in the present report (n=79), it would have been difficult to study this aspect in depth. However, it would be reasonable for future studies to be directed to providing this information.
To gain insight into the effect of RRR-AT and
all-rac-AT on the oxidative susceptibility of LDL, the time
course of copper-catalyzed oxidation was performed, and the lag phase,
maximum oxidation, and oxidation rate were computed from the data. This
study confirmed our earlier dose-response study, in that doses
400
IU/d resulted in significant prolongation of the lag phase of oxidation
as determined by the conjugated-dienes assay. Lag phase, as determined
by lipid peroxide assay, was also significantly increased after
supplementation with 800 IU/d in both groups and 400 IU/d of
RRR-AT. However, the 400 IU/d all-rac-AT group
also showed a significant trend (P=.04) to increased lag
phases after supplementation when compared with baseline. There were no
significant differences in lag phases of oxidation between
RRR-AT and all-rac-AT groups at any of the doses
studied. This is in agreement with the findings of Reaven and
Witztum,28 who showed that LDL isolated from groups that
received 1600 mg RRR-AT and all-rac-AT were
equally resistant to oxidation as measured by the formation of
conjugated dienes and lipid peroxides. However, in that study, the
pharmacological dose of AT may have obliterated any differences in
beneficial effects that might have been seen with lower doses of
RRR-AT compared with all-rac-AT.
Also, there appears to be no significant difference between RRR-AT and all-rac-AT on LDL oxidation in vitro as evidenced by the lag phase. Thus, it appears that the major function of the phytyl chain is to "anchor" the AT molecule to LDL and biomembranes.50 Niki et al51 arrived at similar conclusions by using the oxidation of methyl linoleate and soybean phosphatidylcholine as substrates for oxidation.
In conclusion, this study has shown that in healthy individuals,
supplementation with either RRR-AT or all-rac-AT
resulted in similar increases in plasma and LDL AT levels at equivalent
IU doses. Also, the degree of protection by RRR-AT and
all-rac-AT against copper-catalyzed LDL oxidation was
similar. This study has again reiterated that the threshold for
efficacy against LDL oxidation is 400 IU/d of RRR-AT or
all-rac-AT. Thus, our study suggests that future clinical
trials designed to test the antioxidant effect of AT may use either
RRR-AT or all-rac-AT at doses
400 IU/d.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received December 8, 1996; accepted March 28, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Berliner JA, Heinecke JW. The role of oxidized lipoproteins in atherogenesis. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;20:707-727.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Parthasarathy S, Renkin SM. Role of oxidized low density lipoprotein in atherogenesis. Prog Lipid Res. 1992;92:127-143.
4. Kume N, Cybulski MI, Gimbrone MA Jr. Lysophosphatidylcholine, a component of atherogenic lipoproteins, induces mononuclear leukocyte adhesion molecules in cultured human and rabbit arterial endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:1138-1144.
5. Jacobs M, Plane F, Bruckdorfer KR. Native and oxidized low density lipoproteins have different inhibitory effects on endothelium-derived relaxing factor in the rabbit aorta. Br J Pharmacol. 1990;100:21-26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Haberland ME, Fong D, Cheng L.
Malondialdehyde-altered protein occurs in atheroma of
Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits.
Science. 1988;241:215-218.
7.
Palinski W, Rosenfeld ME, Yla-Herttuala S, Gurtner GC,
Socher SS, Butler SW, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Steinberg D, Witztum
JL. Low density lipoprotein undergoes oxidative modifications in
vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:1372-1376.
8.
Kita T, Nagano Y, Yokode M, Ishii K, Kume N, Ooshima
A, Yoshida H, Kawai C. Probucol prevents the progression of
atherosclerosis in Watanabe heritable
hyperlipidemia rabbits, an animal model for familial
hypercholesterolemia. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:5928-5931.
9.
Björkem I, Henriksson-Freyschuss A, Breuer O,
Diczfalusy V, Berglund L, Henriksson P. The antioxidant
butylated hydroxytoluene protects against
atherosclerosis. Arterioscler
Thromb. 1991;11:15-22.
10. Sparrow CP, Doebber TW, Olszewski J, Wu MS, Ventre J, Stevens KA, Chao Y. Low density lipoprotein is protected from oxidation and the progression of atherosclerosis is slowed in cholesterol-fed rabbits by the antioxidant N,N'-diphenyl-phenylenediamine. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:1885-1891.
11. Esterbauer H, Dieber-Rotheneder M, Waeg G, Puhl H, Tatzber F. Endogenous antioxidants and lipoprotein oxidation. Biochem Soc Trans. 1990;18:1059-1061.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Gey KF, Puska P, Jordan P, Moser U. Inverse correlation between vitamin E and mortality from ischemic heart disease in cross-cultural epidemiology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;53:326-335.
13. Manson JE, Gaziano JM, Jonas MA, Hennekens CH. Antioxidants and cardiovascular disease: a review. J Am Coll Nutr. 1993;12:426-432.[Abstract]
14. Riemersma RA, Wood DA, MacIntyre CCA, Elton RA, Gey KF, Oliver MF. Risk of angina pectoris and plasma concentrations of vitamins A, C and E and carotene. Lancet. 1991;337:1-5.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH, Manson JE, Colditz GA,
Rosner B, Willett WC. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of
coronary artery disease in women. N Engl
J Med. 1993;328:1444-1449.
16.
Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, Giovannucci E,
Colditz GA, Willett WC. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of
coronary disease in men. N Engl J
Med. 1993;328:1450-1456.
17.
Dieber-Rotheneder M, Puhl H, Wage G, Streigl G,
Esterbauer H. Effect of oral supplementation with
D-
-tocopherol on the vitamin E content of human LDL and
resistance to oxidation. J Lipid Res. 1991;32:1325-1332.[Abstract]
18.
Jialal I, Grundy SM. Effect of dietary
supplementation with
-tocopherol on the oxidative
modification of low density lipoprotein. J Lipid
Res. 1992;33:899-906.[Abstract]
19. Princen HMG, Van Poppel G, Vogelezang C, Bukytenhek R, Kok FJ. Supplementation with vitamin E but not ß-carotene in vivo protects LDL from peroxidation in vitro: effect of cigarette smoking. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;11:483-488.
20. Esterbauer H, Dieber-Rotheneder M, Striegl G, Waeg G. Role of vitamin E in preventing the oxidation of low density lipoprotein. Am J Clin Nutr. 1911;53:314-321S.
21.
Jialal I, Fuller CJ, Huet BA. The effect of
-tocopherol supplementation on LDL oxidation: a
dose-response study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:190-198.
22. Reaven PD, Herold DA, Barnett J, Edelman S. Effects of vitamin E on susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein subfractions to oxidation and on protein glycation in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:807-816.[Abstract]
23.
Fuller CJ, Chandalia M, Garg A, Grundy SM, Jialal
I. RRR-
-tocopherol acetate
supplementation at pharmacologic doses decreases
low-density-lipoprotein oxidative susceptibility but not protein
glycation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J
Clin Nutr. 1996;63:753-759.
24.
Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, Selzer RH, Liu C,
Alaupovic P, KwongFu H, Azen SP. Serial coronary
angiographic evidence that antioxidant vitamin intake reduces
progression of coronary artery
atherosclerosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1849-1854.
25. Stephens SG, Parsons A, Schofield PM, Kelly F, Cheeseman K, Mitchinson MJ, Brown MJ. Randomized controlled trial of vitamin E in patients with coronary disease: Cambridge Heart Antioxidant Study (CHAOS). Lancet. 1996;347:781-786.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Kayden JH, Traber MG. Absorption, lipoprotein transport, and regulation of plasma concentrations of vitamin E in humans. J Lipid Res. 1993;34:343-358.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Traber MG. Determinants of plasma vitamin E concentrations. Free Radic Biol Med. 1994;16:229-239.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Reaven PD, Witztum JL. Comparison of
supplementation of RRR-
-tocopherol
and racemic
-tocopherol in humans: effects of lipid
levels and lipoprotein susceptibility to oxidation. Arterioscler
Thromb. 1993;13:601-608.
29.
Arnaud J, Fortis I, Blachier S, Kia D, Favier A.
Simultaneous determination of retinol,
tocopherol and ß-carotene in serum by isocratic high
performance liquid chromatography.
J Chromatogr. 1991;572:103-116.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr A, Randall RJ.
Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent. J
Biol Chem. 1951;193:265-275.
31. El-Saadani M, Esterbauer H, El-Sayed M, Goher M, Nassar AY, Jurgens G. A spectrophotometric assay for lipid peroxides in serum lipoproteins using a commercially available reagent. J Lipid Res. 1989;30:627-630.[Abstract]
32. Tsai EC, Hirsch IB, Brunzell JD, Chait A. Reduced plasma peroxyl radical trapping capacity and increased susceptibility of LDL to oxidation in poorly controlled IDDM. Diabetes. 1994;43:1010-1014.[Abstract]
33. Maggi E, Bellazzi R, Falaschi F, Frattoni A, Perani G, Finardi G, Gazo A, Nai M, Romanini D, Bellomo G. Enhanced LDL oxidation in uremic patients: an additional mechanism for accelerated atherosclerosis? Kidney Int. 1994;45;876-883.
34. Maggi E, Marchesi E, Ravetta V, Falaschi F, Finardi G, Bellomo G. Low-density lipoprotein oxidation in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1993;11:1103-1111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Tribble D, van den Berg J, Motchnik P, Ames B, Lewis D,
Chait A, Krauss R. Oxidative susceptibility of low density
lipoprotein subfractions is related to their ubiquinol-10 and
-tocopherol content. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1994;91:1183-1187.
36. Cominacini L, Garbin U, Pastorino A, Davoli A, Campagnola M, De Santis A, Pasini C, Faccini GB, Trevisan MT, Bertozzo L, Pasini F, Lo Cascio V. Predisposition to LDL oxidation in patients with and without angiographically established coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 1993;99:63-70.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Regnström J, Nilsson J, Tornvall P, Landou C, Hamsten A. Susceptibility to low-density lipoprotein oxidation and coronary atherosclerosis in man. Lancet. 1992;339:1183-1186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Westrope KL, Miller RA, Wilson RB. Vitamin E in a rabbit model of endogenous hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. Nutr Rep Int. 1982;25:83-88.
39. Smith TL, Kummerow RA. Effect of dietary vitamin E on plasma lipids and atherogenesis in restricted ovulator hens. Atherosclerosis. 1989;75:105-109.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Verlangieri AJ, Buxh MJ. Effects of d-
tocopherol supplementation on experimentally induced
primate atherosclerosis. J Am Coll
Nutr. 1992;11:131-138.[Abstract]
41.
Boscoboinik D, Szewczyk A, Hensey C, Azzi A.
Inhibition of cell proliferation by
-tocopherol: role of
protein kinase C. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:6188-6194.
42.
Faruqi R, de la Motte C, DiCorleto PE.
-Tocopherol inhibits agonist-induced monocyte cell
adhesion to cultured human endothelial cells.
J Clin Invest. 1994;94:592-600.
43.
Salonen JT, Salonen R, Seppanen K, Rinta-Kiikas S,
Kuukka M, Korpela H, Alfthan G, Kantola M, Schalch W. Effects of
antioxidant supplementation on platelet function: a randomized
pair-matched, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in men with low
antioxidant status. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53:1222-1229.
44.
Keaney JF Jr, Gaziano JM, Xu A, Frei B,
Curran-Celentano J, Shwaery GT, Loscalzo J, Vita JA. Low-dose
-tocopherol improves and high-dose
-tocopherol worsens endothelial
vasodilator function in cholesterol-fed rabbits.
J Clin Invest. 1994;93:844-851.
45.
Devaraj S, Li D, Jialal I. The effects of
tocopherol supplementation on monocyte function.
J Clin Invest. 1996;98:756-763.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Kappus H, Diplock AT. Tolerance and safety of vitamin E: a toxicological position report. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992;13:55-74.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Winklhofer-Roob BM. van't Hoff MA, Shmerling
DH. Long-term oral vitamin E supplementation in cystic fibrosis
patients: RRR-
-tocopherol compared
with all-rac-
-tocopheryl acetate preparations.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;63:722-728.
48.
Weiser H, Vecchi M. Stereoisomers of
-tocopheryl acetate, II: biopotencies of all 8 stereoisomers as
determined by rat resorption: gestation tests. Int J Vit
Nutr Res. 1982;52:351-370.
49.
Ferslew K, Acuff R, Daigneault E, Woolley T, Stanton
P. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of the
RRR and all racemic stereoisomers of
-tocopherol in humans after single oral administration.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;33:84-88.[Abstract]
50. Kamal-Eldin A, Appelqvist L. The chemistry and antioxidant properties of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Lipids. 1996;31:671-701.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Niki E, Kawakami A, Saito M, Yamamoto Y, Tsuchiya J,
Kamiya Y. Effect of phytyl side chain of vitamin E on its
antioxidant activity. J Bio Chem. 1985;260:2191-2196.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. W. Leonard, J. D. Joss, D. J. Mustacich, D. H. Blatt, Y. S. Lee, and M. G. Traber Effects of vitamin E on cholesterol levels of hypercholesterolemic patients receiving statins Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., November 1, 2007; 64(21): 2257 - 2266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G Traber How much vitamin E? ... Just enough! Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2006; 84(5): 959 - 960. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Rumbold, C. A. Crowther, R. R. Haslam, G. A. Dekker, J. S. Robinson, and the ACTS Study Group Vitamins C and E and the risks of preeclampsia and perinatal complications. N. Engl. J. Med., April 27, 2006; 354(17): 1796 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Proteggente, R. Turner, J. Majewicz, G. Rimbach, A. M. Minihane, K. Kramer, and J. K. Lodge Noncompetitive Plasma Biokinetics of Deuterium-Labeled Natural and Synthetic {alpha}-Tocopherol in Healthy Men with an apoE4 Genotype J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1063 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W Leonard, C. K Good, E. T Gugger, and M. G Traber Vitamin E bioavailability from fortified breakfast cereal is greater than that from encapsulated supplements Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2004; 79(1): 86 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J O'Byrne, S. Devaraj, S. M Grundy, and I. Jialal Comparison of the antioxidant effects of Concord grape juice flavonoids {alpha}-tocopherol on markers of oxidative stress in healthy adults Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2002; 76(6): 1367 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. RICCIARELLI, J.-M. ZINGG, and A. AZZI Vitamin E: protective role of a Janus molecule FASEB J, November 1, 2001; 15(13): 2314 - 2325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Devaraj, I. Hugou, and I. Jialal {{alpha}}-Tocopherol decreases CD36 expression in human monocyte-derived macrophages J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2001; 42(4): 521 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hennig, M. Toborek, and C. J. McClain High-Energy Diets, Fatty Acids and Endothelial Cell Function: Implications for Atherosclerosis J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2001; 20(2): 97 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Lonn, S. Yusuf, V. Dzavik, C. I. Doris, Q. Yi, S. Smith, A. Moore-Cox, J. Bosch, W. A. Riley, and K. K. Teo Effects of Ramipril and Vitamin E on Atherosclerosis : The Study to Evaluate Carotid Ultrasound Changes in Patients Treated With Ramipril and Vitamin E (SECURE) Circulation, February 20, 2001; 103(7): 919 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Azzi, I. Breyer, M. Feher, R. Ricciarelli, A. Stocker, S. Zimmer, and J.-M. Zingg Nonantioxidant Functions of {{alpha}}-Tocopherol in Smooth Muscle Cells J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 378S - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Traber Does Vitamin E Decrease Heart Attack Risk? Summary and Implications with Respect to Dietary Recommendations J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 395S - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kaul, S. Devaraj, and I. Jialal {{alpha}}-Tocopherol and Atherosclerosis Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2001; 226(1): 5 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Azzi, I. Breyer, M. Feher, M. Pastori, R. Ricciarelli, S. Spycher, M. Staffieri, A. Stocker, S. Zimmer, and J.-M. Zingg Specific Cellular Responses to {alpha}-Tocopherol J. Nutr., July 1, 2000; 130(7): 1649 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Emmert and J. T. Kirchner The Role of Vitamin E in the Prevention of Heart Disease Arch Fam Med, November 1, 1999; 8(6): 537 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Palomaki, K. Malminiemi, O. Malminiemi, and T. Solakivi Effects of Lovastatin Therapy on Susceptibility of LDL to Oxidation During {alpha}-Tocopherol Supplementation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 1999; 19(6): 1541 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |