Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17:1910-1917

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cuchel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cuchel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, A. H.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17:1910-1917.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Lovastatin Decreases De Novo Cholesterol Synthesis and LDL Apo B-100 Production Rates in Combined-Hyperlipidemic Males

Marina Cuchel; Ernst J. Schaefer; John S. Millar; Peter J.H. Jones; Gregory G. Dolnikowski; Carlo Vergani; ; Alice H. Lichtenstein

From the Lipid Research Laboratory, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, New England Medical Center, Boston (M.C., J.S.M., E.J.S., G.G.D., A.H.L.); the School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada (P.J.H.J.); and the Cattedra di Gerontologia e Geriatria, Istituto di Medicina Interna, Universitá degli Studi, Milan, Italy (C.V.).

Correspondence to Dr. Alice H. Lichtenstein, New England Medical Center, NEMC Box 216, Boston, MA 02111. E-mail lichtenst_li{at}hnrc.tufts.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract The effect of lovastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity, on the kinetics of de novo cholesterol synthesis and apolipoprotein (apo) B in very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was investigated in five male patients with combined hyperlipidemia. Subjects were counseled to follow a Step 2 diet and were treated with lovastatin and placebo in randomly assigned order for 6-week periods. At the end of each experimental period, subjects were given deuterium oxide orally and de novo cholesterol synthesis was assessed from deuterium incorporation into cholesterol and expressed as fractional synthesis rate (C-FSR) and production rate (C-PR). Simultaneously, the kinetics of VLDL, IDL, and LDL apo B-100 were studied in the fed state using a primed-constant infusion of deuterated leucine to measure fractional catabolic rates (FCR) and production rates (PR). Drug treatment resulted in significant decreases in total cholesterol (-29%), VLDL cholesterol (-40%), LDL cholesterol (-27%), and apo B (-16%) levels and increases in HDL cholesterol (+13%) and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I (+11%) levels. Associated with these plasma lipoprotein responses was a significant reduction in both de novo C-FSR (-40%; P=.04) and C-PR (-42%; P=.03). Treatment with lovastatin in these patients had no significant effect on the FCR of apoB-100 in VLDL, IDL, or LDL, but resulted in a significant decrease in the PR of apoB-100 in IDL and LDL. Comparing the kinetic data of these patients with those of 10 normolipidemic control subjects indicates that lovastatin treatment normalized apoB-100 IDL and LDL PR. The results of these studies suggest that the declines in plasma lipid levels observed after treatment of combined hyperlipidemic patients with lovastatin are attributable to reductions in the C-FSR and C-PR of de novo cholesterol synthesis and the PR of apoB-100 containing lipoproteins. The decline in de novo cholesterol synthesis, rather than an increase in direct uptake of VLDL and IDL, may have contributed to the decline in the PR observed.


Key Words: lovastatin • cholesterol • kinetics • lipoproteins • hyperlipidemia • fractional catabolic rate • production rate • apo B-100


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
An elevated LDL cholesterol concentration is considered to be one of the major risk factors for the development of coronary heart disease (CHD).1 The efficacy of LDL reduction in the prevention of CHD has been clearly demonstrated.2 3 4 5 6 The most powerful classes of cholesterol-lowering drugs are the inhibitors of the activity of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. Treatment with HMG CoA reductase inhibitors has been reported to reduce plasma total and LDL cholesterol, and LDL apolipoprotein (apo) B levels in hypercholesterolemic subjects independent of the underlying metabolic disorder.7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Changes in cholesterol synthesis rates during HMG CoA reductase inhibitor treatment have been studied in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia using several in vivo methodologies. Studies conducted using the cholesterol balance technique,14 urinary mevalonate excretion,15 16 and changes in serum lathosterol concentration17 have suggested that HMG CoA reductase inhibitors decrease the rate of de novo cholesterol synthesis.

Despite the postulated mechanism of action of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, the effects of this class of drugs on the metabolism of apoB-containing lipoproteins has yet to be fully elucidated. Early studies on the action of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors in subjects with hypercholesterolemia have attributed the reduction in plasma cholesterol levels to increased LDL receptor activity secondary to a fall in the intracellular free cholesterol pools.18 An increase in LDL receptor-mediated catabolism of apo B-containing lipoproteins has also been postulated in studies conducted in normolipidemic subjects19 and in patients with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia.20 In contrast, studies in subjects with a variety of primary hyperlipidemic disorders10 11 13 21 22 23 24 and secondary hyperlipidemic disorders25 26 suggest that the plasma LDL cholesterol reduction may be due to decreased production of LDL apo B-100, possibly due to decreased hepatic secretion of apo B-containing lipoproteins or increased uptake of VLDL remnants.

The objective of this study was to further investigate mechanisms by which lovastatin decreases plasma cholesterol and apo B-100 levels in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. We used stable isotope tracers to simultaneously assess the effect of lovastatin on de novo cholesterol synthesis and apo B-100 metabolism in five patients with elevated plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels, and decreased HDL cholesterol levels.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
Five male patients with combined hyperlipidemia were recruited from the Lipid Clinic at the New England Medical Center Hospital in Boston. All patients had total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels above the 90th percentile for appropriate age and sex norms, and HDL cholesterol levels below the 10th percentile (Table 1Down). Patients were evaluated for cardiac, hepatic, renal, endocrine, and metabolic diseases by routine clinical and laboratory analysis. The clinical characteristics and selected risk factor status of study patients are shown in Table 1Down. The mean age of the subjects was 51 years (range 33-66 years). The two subjects with the highest total and LDL cholesterol levels had established disease. Patient 2 developed angina at age 35 years, and at age 39 years had coronary artery bypass grafting for significant three-vessel disease. Cardiac medications were a long-acting nitrate and sublingual nitroglycerine as necessary, which continued throughout the course of the study. Additionally, thyroid hormone replacement therapy was maintained in order to normalize thyroid status (a normal TSH concentration). Patient 4 developed evidence of left carotid artery stenosis at age 52 years. He underwent left carotid artery surgery at the age of 58 and subsequently had a complete occlusion of that vessel. He was instructed to take 3 g of niacin per day, which was later decreased to 1-2 g/d because of difficulty with compliance. This therapy was terminated before the start of the study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical Characteristics and Selected Risk Factor Status of the Study Subjects

All patients had been instructed by a registered dietitian to consume a Step 2 diet for at least 3 months prior to the start of the study and were seen on a regular basis to reinforce these guidelines.1 Lovastatin was well tolerated by all the study patients. The experimental protocol was approved by the Human Investigation Review Committee of the New England Medical Center and Tufts University and each subject gave written informed consent.

Ten control subjects for comparison purposes were selected on the basis of age from a group of healthy male volunteers with total cholesterol and triglyceride levels below the 90th percentile for age and sex norms. These subjects were part of a larger population that has previously been reported.27

Experimental Protocol
Each patient was studied on two occasions, at the end of a 6-week placebo treatment period and at the end of a 6-week lovastatin treatment period (40 mg/d twice a day). The order of placebo and drug treatment was randomized and administered in a double-blind fashion. A 6-week washout period separated the two phases.

At the end of each treatment period the patients were admitted to the Clinical Research Center at New England Medical Center for a 2-day period. All kinetic studies were carried out with patients in the continuously fed state as previously described.27 28 Briefly, patients were provided with small hourly meals containing 1/20 of their daily caloric intake for a total of 20 hours. The diet was composed of solid foods and the nutrient content was consistent with Step 2 guidelines. Five hours after the first meal each subject received an oral bolus of 1.2 g/kg of estimated body water (60% of body weight) of deuterium oxide to study de novo cholesterol synthesis rates. Simultaneously, a 15-hour primed-constant infusion of deuterated [2H3]-leucine was started to assess apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 kinetics (bolus injection of 10 µmol/kg of body weight, immediately followed by a constant infusion of 10 µmol/kg of body weight per hour). Blood samples were taken for deuterium enrichment determinations at 0 and 15 hours for cholesterol and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 15 hours for apo B-100 leucine.

Analytical Procedures
Plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and apoproteins. Blood samples were collected in tubes containing EDTA (0.1% final concentration). Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm at 4°C and assayed for total cholesterol and triglyceride levels using enzymatic reagents.29 HDL cholesterol was measured after precipitation of apo B-containing lipoproteins with dextran sulfate-MgCl from plasma.30

Lipoprotein fractions representing triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (d<1.006 g/mL), which contains chylomicrons and VLDL in the fed state, intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL, d=1.006-1.019 g/mL), and LDL (d=1.019-1.063 g/mL) were isolated from plasma by sequential ultracentrifugation.31 As it is assumed that essentially all the apo B-100 in the triglyceride-rich lipoprotein fraction was contained in VLDL, this fraction will henceforth be referred to as VLDL.

Apo B concentrations were quantified in plasma, VLDL, and IDL with a noncompetitive ELISA using immunopurified polyclonal antibodies.32 LDL apo B concentration was calculated by difference [LDL apo B = plasma apo B-(VLDL apo B+IDL apo B)]. Apo B-100 was isolated from VLDL, IDL, and LDL fractions by preparative SDS polyacrylamide gradient (4-22.5%) gel electrophoresis.33

Cholesterol deuterium enrichment. Deuterium enrichment in plasma cholesterol was determined as described previously.34 35 36 37 Briefly, after lipid extraction and saponification, cholesterol was separated by thin-layer chromatography, eluted from the silica gel, and combusted in the presence of cupric oxide and sterling silver. Both water derived from the combustion of cholesterol and plasma water were reduced to hydrogen gas in the presence of zinc. Hydrogen gas deuterium enrichment was measured by differential isotope ratio mass spectrometry (VG Isomass, 903D, Cheshire, England). The instrument was calibrated daily using water standards of known isotopic composition. Samples of each subject were analyzed using a single set of standards.

Apo B-100 deuterium enrichment. Polyacrylamide gel bands containing apo B-100 were excised from the gel and acid hydrolyzed. The amino acids from apo B-100 were then isolated using Dowex AG-50W-X8 100-200 mesh cation exchange resin (Bio-Rad Labs, Richmond, Calif) and converted to the n-propyl ester N-heptafluorobutyramide derivatives.38 The dried derivatives were extracted into ethyl acetate prior to analysis by GC/MS.38

Kinetic Analysis
Cholesterol kinetic analysis. Cholesterol fractional synthetic rate (C-FSR; pools per day) was determined from the incorporation rate of the precursor deuterium into plasma total cholesterol relative to the maximum theoretical enrichment using the linear regression model.36 The assumptions underlying the use of labeled water as tracer for measurements of C-FSR and model consideration have been extensively described elsewhere.36 The cholesterol production rate (C-PR; in grams per day) was derived by multiplying C-FSR by the cholesterol central pool size. The central pool size of cholesterol was estimated from body weight and plasma concentration of both cholesterol and triglyceride as described by Goodman et al.39 The C-PR provides a measure of the daily production of newly synthesized cholesterol.

Apo B-100 kinetic analysis. Fractional catabolic rate (FCR; pools per day) of apo B-100-containing particles was calculated with CONSAM with a multicompartmental model as previously described.27 Briefly, the model features secretion of newly synthesized apo B-100 into VLDL. The model structure includes a VLDL delipidation chain, a slow VLDL compartment, a fast and slow IDL compartment, and a single LDL compartment. Production rates (PR; mg/kg/d) of the apo B-100-containing particles were calculated by multiplying the apo B-100 FCR by the estimated apo B pool size: [apo B concentration (mg/dL) x body weight (kg) x0.045]. All kinetic rates are expressed per 24 hours.

Statistics
Comparison between drug and placebo phases was determined using a Student's paired t-test. Comparisons between patients and normal control subjects were determined using an unpaired Student's t-test.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Six weeks of drug treatment resulted in a significant decrease in total cholesterol (-29%), VLDL cholesterol (-40%), LDL cholesterol (-27%), and apo B (-16%) levels (Table 2Down). Also observed was a significant increase in HDL cholesterol (+13%) and apo A-I (+11%) levels. Triglyceride levels decreased by 24%; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=.07).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels during the Placebo and Lovastatin Periods

Lovastatin had a dramatic effect on the rates of de novo cholesterol synthesis. Drug treatment resulted in a significant reduction in both C-FSR (-40%; P=.04) and C-PR (-42%; P=.03) (Table 3Down). Both total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels were positively correlated with C-FSR (r=.992, P<.001 and r=.879, P=.050, respectively) and C-PR (r=.972, P=.005 and r=.877, P=.051, respectively) during treatment with lovastatin. No correlation was found between total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels and C-FSR (r=.362, P=.550 and r=.446, P=.452, respectively) and C-PR (r=.409, P=.494 and r=.565, P=.321, respectively) during treatment with placebo. These data suggest that reduced levels of plasma total and LDL cholesterol observed after treatment of the combined hyperlipidemic subjects with lovastatin were a result, in part, of reduced rates of de novo cholesterol synthesis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Cholesterol Fractional Synthesis Rates and Production Rates during the Placebo and Lovastatin Periods

Apo B-100 plasma concentration and kinetic parameters are shown in Tables 4Down, 5Down, and 6Down for VLDL, IDL, and LDL, respectively. The plots of the model fit to the apoB-100 kinetic data for each subject on drug and placebo treatments are shown in the FigureDown. Mean VLDL apo B concentrations (Table 4Down) were reduced after treatment with lovastatin compared to treatment with the placebo. However, the mean differences between the two periods did not reach statistical significance (P=.071). There was no significant effect of lovastatin on VLDL apoB-100 FCR (P=.892) or PR (P=.150). The conversion rate of VLDL to IDL averaged 88% and was unaffected by drug treatment. It should be noted that after drug treatment VLDL apoB-100 PR was decreased in four of five of the subjects. Subject 5 had a somewhat different response than that of the other four subjects. His VLDL apoB PR increased (from 26.7 to 30.6 mg/kg/d) and the conversion rate of VLDL to IDL decreased (from 85% to 50%) after drug treatment. Analysis of the subgroup of subjects 1 to 4 suggested that lovastatin tended to decrease VLDL apoB-100 PR in these subjects (placebo 23.0±6.8, lovastatin 14.7±2.7 mg/kg/d, P=.060) and had no significant effect on the conversion of VLDL to IDL.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Pool Size, Fractional Catabolic Rates, and Production Rates of VLDL Apo B-100


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Pool Size, Fractional Catabolic Rates, and Production Rates of IDL Apo B-100


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Pool Size, Fractional Catabolic Rates, and Production Rates of LDL Apo B-100



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Calculated and observed apolipoprotein B-100 kinetics data for VLDL (squares), IDL (circles), and LDL (triangles) before (solid lines, filled symbols) and during (dotted lines, open symbols) lovastatin treatment.

Treatment with lovastatin resulted in a significant reduction in IDL apo B concentrations in the study subjects (P=.009) (Table 5Up). The kinetic data suggest that there was a decrease in IDL apo B-100 PR (P=.010) rather than a change in the IDL apo B-100 FCR (P=.340). A subgroup analysis of subjects 1 to 4 did not change the interpretation of the results. The decrease in IDL apo B-100 PR that was observed after lovastatin treatment in all the study subjects was attributable to a decrease in VLDL apo B-100 PR with no change in the percentage of VLDL converted to IDL in subjects 1 to 4 (Table 4Up). In subject 5, the reduction in IDL apo B-100 PR seemed to be primarily due to an increased direct removal of VLDL from plasma.

Treatment with lovastatin resulted in a significant reduction in LDL apo B concentrations in all subjects (P=.044) (Table 6Up). The kinetic data suggest that this reduction was contributed to primarily by a decrease in LDL apo B-100 PR (P=.019). These differences were maintained after subject 5 was eliminated from the analysis. There was no change in the percentage of IDL converted to LDL after lovastatin treatment as compared with the data after placebo treatment (Table 5Up).

Apo B-100 kinetic parameters of the patients during the placebo and lovastatin treatment periods were compared with those parameters of a comparable age-matched group of normolipidemic male subjects not taking medications known to alter plasma lipid levels (Table 7Down and 8Down). Relative to the normolipidemic subjects, the hyperlipidemic patients tended to have lower VLDL apo B-100 FCR both during the placebo and lovastatin periods, with the differences approaching statistical significance (P=.07 and P=.07, placebo and lovastatin periods, respectively) (Table 7Down). There were no significant differences in IDL or LDL apo B-100 FCR between the normolipidemic subjects and the hyperlipidemic patients either on or off drug therapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Fractional Catabolic Rate of Apo B-100 in Normolipidemic Control Subjects and Combined Hyperlipidemic Patients after Treatment with Placebo and Lovastatin


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Production Rates of Apo B-100 in Normolipidemic Control Subjects and Combined Hyperlipidemic Patients after Treatment with Placebo and Lovastatin

During the placebo period hyperlipidemic patients had IDL and LDL apo B-100 PR that were significantly higher than those of the normolipidemic subjects (P=.01 and P=.01, IDL and LDL, respectively). Treatment with lovastatin resulted in a reduction in these rates so that they were statistically indistinguishable from those of the normolipidemic subjects (P=.81 and P=.55, IDL and LDL, respectively).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Treatment of combined hyperlipidemic male patients with lovastatin for a 6-week period resulted in significantly lower plasma levels of total cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apo B relative to the period when the patients were treated with a placebo drug. Kinetic studies in our patients suggest that the reduction in circulating levels of cholesterol and apo B were contributed to by both a decrease in the rate and amount of cholesterol synthesized de novo and a decrease in the amount of newly synthesized apo B-100 incorporated into IDL, LDL, and possibly VLDL. The percentage of conversion of VLDL to IDL and LDL was not significantly changed. We found no evidence that the rate of catabolism of apo B-100-containing lipoproteins from plasma was increased. Whereas during the placebo period the PR of apo B-100 in IDL and LDL of the hyperlipidemic subjects were elevated relative to those of age- and sex-matched control subjects, after lovastatin treatment the PR of the hyperlipidemic subjects was similar to those of the control subjects.

In the current study, the C-FSR and C-PR of de novo synthesized cholesterol were dramatically reduced (40% and 42%, C-FSR and C-PR, respectively) after the 6-week lovastatin treatment period relative to the placebo period. The magnitude of the reductions is similar to that observed in the previous studies assessing the effect of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors on cholesterol synthesis in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia,14 15 16 17 and patients with gallstone disease40 and cholesteryl ester storage disease.23 The current work, using a direct method to calculate the de novo cholesterol synthesis, extends the previous findings to patients with other forms of dyslipoproteinemia and suggests that the reductions in plasma cholesterol levels observed are independent of type of hyperlipidemia and are probably due to a common mechanism.

The mean VLDL apo B-100 PR of subjects was lower, but not significantly so (P=.15), after treatment with lovastatin. Interpretation of the VLDL apo B-100 data is complicated by the aberrant response of patient 5. Patient 5's VLDL apo B-100 PR increased by 15% after lovastatin treatment despite a 62% decrease in the C-PR and in contrast to the other four subjects, who all showed declines in the VLDL apo B-100 PR of 21% to 54%. IDL and LDL apo B-100 were significantly reduced during lovastatin treatment for all the subjects. This was due to a decrease in VLDL apo B-100 PR, with the exception of patient 5. In this patient, we observed a decrease in the percentage of conversion of VLDL to IDL, indicating an increased removal from plasma that accounted for his reduced IDL apo B-100 PR. Precedence for this variability in response to an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor on lipoprotein kinetics has been noted previously.10

In contrast to the consistent observations on the effect of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors on rates of de novo cholesterol synthesis, the data on the metabolism of apo B-containing lipoproteins is more varied (Table 9Down). Similar to the findings of the current study, Grundy and Vega,10 25 Ginsberg et al,23 Arad et al,11 Vega et al,21 Watts et al,24 and Aguilar-Salimas et al26 reported that, independent of the type of dyslipidemia, the decreased concentrations of LDL cholesterol were primarily attributable to a decrease in PR. The decrease in the PR of LDL apo B-100 was due to either an increased uptake of VLDL remnants (VLDL and/or IDL) or a decreased hepatic secretion of apo B-containing lipoproteins. Focusing on patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia, Vega et al13 concluded that both decreased PR and increased FCR of lipoproteins contributed to the decrease in VLDL and LDL apo B-100 observed as a result of lovastatin therapy. Finally, in a comprehensive assessment of the effect of simvastatin on apo B metabolism and lipoprotein subfractions, Gaw et al22 concluded that the resultant kinetic changes were associated with an increase in the direct catabolism of VLDL2 and IDL and consequent decreased PR of LDL.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 9. Published Data on Variations in Metabolism of ApoB-Containing Lipoproteins

In contrast with the findings of the current study, Bilheimer et al18 and Arad et al11 have reported that treatment of familial hypercholesterolemic patients with lovastatin resulted in an increased receptor-mediated clearance of LDL. Similarly, Malmendier et al19 and Parhofer et al20 reported that treatment of normolipidemic and mixed hyperlipoproteinemic subjects, respectively, with HMG CoA reductase inhibitors resulted in an increase in LDL apo B-100 catabolic rates.

Recent studies focusing on the mechanism of apo B secretion from hepatic cells have suggested that the secretion rate of apo B-containing particles is dependent on lipid substrate availability (for reviews, see 41 42 ). Some of these in vitro studies suggest that cholesteryl ester availability is one of the most important determinants in the secretion of apo B-containing particles.43 44 Cianflone and colleagues43 demonstrated that HepG2 cells incubated in the presence of lovastatin showed a decreased cholesteryl ester synthesis and a significant reduction in apo B secretion. Tanaka and colleagues44 showed in a rabbit hepatocyte culture system that incubation with pravastatin caused a decrease in de novo cholesterol synthesis, cholesteryl ester content in the cells, and apo B secretion. Moreover, in their experiments pravastatin increased intracellular degradation of apo B, which suggests that the reduction in intracellular cholesteryl ester content accelerates intracellular degradation of apo B and decreases apo B secretion.44 A decreased acyl CoA cholesterol acyltransferase activity during incubation with lovastatin has been demonstrated in intestinal cells.45 These studies support the hypothesis that a decrease in de novo cholesterol synthesis could result in a decrease in the availability of cholesterol for incorporation into newly synthesized lipoprotein particles, with a consequent decrease in apo B-100-containing lipoprotein secretion, as suggested by our study. Relating the findings of the in vitro systems to that of the in vivo work should be done cautiously, however, because complex compensatory mechanisms in vivo may not be operating in vitro.

The results of the current study suggest that treatment of combined hyperlipidemia subjects with lovastatin caused a reduction in the concentrations of total, VLDL, and LDL cholesterol and apo B-100. A reduction in both the rate of de novo cholesterol synthesis and a decrease in the PR of apo B-containing lipoproteins appear to contribute to these changes. No evidence suggesting that a change in the FCR of VLDL, IDL, and LDL, or direct catabolism of VLDL and IDL contribute to the lower levels of blood lipids observed after drug treatment. The current study also found that treatment of the combined hyperlipidemic subjects with lovastatin resulted in a normalization of the PR for apo B-100-containing lipoproteins similar to those observed in normocholesterolemic control subjects. The decrease in cholesterol synthesis rather than increase in direct uptake of apo B-100-containing lipoproteins may have contributed to the decrease in the PR.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
apo = apolipoprotein
C-FSR = cholesterol fractional synthesis rate
CHD = coronary heart disease
C-PR = cholesterol production rate
FCR = fractional catabolic rates
PR = production rates


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a General Clinical Research Center grant from the National Institutes of Health, 5M01RR00054, and a grant from Merck, Sharp & Dohme. We thank the staff of the Clinical Study Unit for their expert technical assistance. We also gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the study subjects, without whom this investigation would not have been possible.

Received September 25, 1996; accepted February 5, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. The Expert Panel. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. JAMA.. 1993;269:3015-3023.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Lipid Research Clinic Program. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results: I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. JAMA.. 1984;251:351-364.[Abstract]
  3. Lipid Research Clinic Program. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results: II. The relationship of reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering. JAMA.. 1984;251:365-374.[Abstract]
  4. Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K, Heininen OP, Heinsalmi P, Helo P, Huttunen JK, Kaitaniemi P, Koskinen P, Manninen V, Maenpaa H, Malkonen M, Manttari M, Norola S, Pasternack A, Pikkarainen J, Romo M, Sjoblom T, Nikkila EA. Helsinki Heart Study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med.. 1987;317:1237-1245.[Abstract]
  5. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:1383-1389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med.. 1995;333:1301-1307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Illingworth DR, Sexton GT. Hypocholesterolemic effects of mevilonin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Invest.. 1984;74:1972-1978.
  8. Havel RJ, Hunninghake DB, Illingworth DR, Lees RS, Stein EA, Tobert JA, Bacon SR, Bolognese JA, Frost PH, Lamkin GE, Lees AM, Leon AS, Gardner K, Johnson G, Mellies MJ, Rhymer PA, Tun P. Lovastatin (mevilonin) in the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a multicenter study. Ann Intern Med.. 1987;107:609-615.
  9. The Lovastatin Study Group. Therapeutic response to lovastatin (mevinolin) in nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia: a multicentric study. JAMA.. 1986;256:2829-2834.[Abstract]
  10. Grundy SM, Vega GL. Influence of mevinolin on metabolism of low density lipoproteins in primary moderate hypercholesterolemia. J Lipid Res.. 1985;26:1464-1475.[Abstract]
  11. Arad Y, Ramakrishnan R, Ginsberg HN. Lovastatin therapy reduces low density lipoprotein apoB levels in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia by reducing the production of apoB-containing lipoproteins: implications for the pathophysiology of apoB production. J Lipid Res.. 1990;31:567-582.[Abstract]
  12. Illingworth DR, O'Malley JP. The hypolipidemic effects of lovastatin and clofibrate alone and in combination in patients with type III hyperlipidemia. Metabolism.. 1990;39:403-409.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Vega GL, East C, Grundy SM. Lovastatin therapy in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia: effects on kinetics of apolipoprotein B. Atherosclerosis.. 1988;70:131-143.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Grundy SM, Bilheimer DW. Inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase by mevinolin in familial hypercholesterolemia heterozygotes: effects on cholesterol balance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.. 1984;81:2538-2542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Pappu AS, Ilingworth DR. Contrasting effects of lovastatin and cholestyramine on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and 24-hour urinary mevalonate excretion in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J Lab Clin Med.. 1989;114:554-562.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Pappu AS, Illingworth DR, Bacon S. Reduction in plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol and urinary mevalonic acid by lovastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism.. 1989;38:542-549.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kempen HJM, Glatz JFC, Leuven JAG, Van der Voort HA, Katan MB. Serum lathosterol concentration is an indicator of whole-body cholesterol synthesis in humans. J Lipid Res.. 1988;29:1149-1155.[Abstract]
  18. Bilheimer DW, Grundy SM, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Mevinolin and colestipol stimulate receptor-mediated clearance of low density lipoprotein from plasma in familial hypercholesterolemia heterozygotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.. 1983;80:4124-4128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Malmendier CL, Lontie J-F, Delcroix C, Magot T. Effect of simvastatin on receptor-dependent low density lipoprotein catabolism in normocholesterolemic human volunteers. Atheroslerosis.. 1989;80:101-109.
  20. Parhofer KG, Barrett PHR, Dunn J, Schonfeld G. Effect of pravastatin on metabolic parameters of apolipoprotein B in patients with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. Clin Invest.. 1993;71:939-946.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Vega GL, Krauss RM, Grundy SM. Pravastatin therapy in primary moderate hypercholesterolemia: changes in metabolism of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins. J Intern Med.. 1990;227:81-94.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Gaw A, Packard CJ, Murray EF, Lindsay GM, Griffin BC, Caslake MJ, Vallance BD, Lorimer AR, Shepherd J. Effects of simvastatin on apoB metabolism and LDL subfraction distribution. Arterioscler Thromb.. 1993;13:170-189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ginsberg HN, Le N-A, Short MP, Ramakrishnan R, Desnick RJ. Suppression of apolipoprotein B production during treatment of cholesteryl ester storage disease with lovastatin. J Clin Invest.. 1987;80:1692-1697.
  24. Watts GF, Cummings MH, Umpleby M, Quiney JR, Naoumova R, Thompson GR, Sönksen PH. Simvastatin decreases the hepatic secretion of very-low-density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B-100 in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: pathophysiological and therapeutic implications. Eur J Clin Invest.. 1995;25:559-567.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Vega GL, Grundy SM. Lovastatin therapy in nephrotic hyperlipidemia: effects on lipoprotein metabolism. Kidney Int.. 1988;33:1160-1168.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Aguilar-Salinas CA, Barrett PHR, Kelber J, Delmez J, Schonfeld G. Physiologic mechanisms of action of lovastatin in nephrotic syndrome. J Lipid Res.. 1995;36:188-199.[Abstract]
  27. Millar JS, Lichtenstein AH, Cuchel M, Dolnikowski GG, Hachey DL, Cohn JS, Schaefer EJ. Impact of age on the metabolism of VLDL, IDL and LDL apolipoprotein B-100 in men. J Lipid Res.. 1995;36:1155-1167.[Abstract]
  28. Lichtenstein AH, Hachey DL, Millar JS, Jenner JL, Booth L, Ordovas J, Schaefer EJ. Measurement of human apolipoprotein B-48 and B-100 kinetics in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins using [5,5,5-2H3] leucine. J Lipid Res.. 1992;33:907-914.[Abstract]
  29. McNamara JR, Schaefer EJ. Automatic enzymatic standardized lipid analyses for plasma and lipoprotein fractions. Clin Chim Acta.. 1987;166:1-8.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Warnick GR, Benderson J, Albers JJ. Dextran sulfate-Mg++ precipitation procedure for quantitation of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin Chem.. 1982;28:1379-1388.[Free Full Text]
  31. Havel RJ, Eder HA, Bragdon JH. The distribution and chemical composition of ultracentrifugally separated lipoproteins in human serum. J Clin Invest.. 1955;34:1345-1353.
  32. Ordovas JM, Peterson J, Santaniello P, Cohn JS, Wilson PWF, Schaefer EJ. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for human plasma apolipoprotein B. J Lipid Res.. 1987;28:1216-1224.[Abstract]
  33. Cohn JS, McNamara JR, Cohn SD, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ. Plasma apolipoprotein changes in the triglyceride-rich lipoprotein fraction of human subjects fed a fat-rich meal. J Lipid Res.. 1988;29:925-936.[Abstract]
  34. Jones PJH, Scanu AM, Schoeller DA. Plasma cholesterol synthesis using deuterated water in humans: effect of short-term food restriction. J Lab Clin Med.. 1988;111:627-633.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Jones PJH, Schoeller DA. Evidence of diurnal periodicity in human cholesterol synthesis. J Lipid Res.. 1990;31:667-673.[Abstract]
  36. Jones PJH, Leitch CA, Li Z-L, Connor WE. Human cholesterol synthesis using deuterated water: theoretical and procedural considerations. Arterioscler Thromb.. 1993;13:247-253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Jones PJH, Lichtenstein AH, Schaefer EJ. Interaction of dietary fat saturation and cholesterol level on cholesterol synthesis measured using deuterium incorporation. J Lipid Res.. 1994;35:1093-1101.[Abstract]
  38. Lichtenstein AH, Cohn JS, Hachey DL, Millar JS, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ. Comparison of deuterated leucine, valine, and lysine in the measurement of human apolipoprotein A-I and B-100. J Lipid Res.. 1990;31:1693-1701.[Abstract]
  39. Goodman DS, Smith FR, Seplowitz AH, Ramakrishnan R, Dell RB. Prediction of the parameters of whole body cholesterol metabolism in humans. J Lipid Res.. 1980;21:699-713.[Abstract]
  40. Reihner E, Ridling M, Stahlberg D, Berglund L, Ewerth S, Bjorkhem I, Einarsson K, Angelin B. Influence of pravastatin, a specific inhibitor of HMG CoA reductase, on hepatic metabolism of cholesterol. N Engl J Med.. 1990;323:224-224.[Abstract]
  41. Sniderman AD, Cianflone K. Substrate delivery as a determinant of hepatic apoB secretion. Arteriscler Thromb.. 1993;13:629-636.
  42. Dixon JL, Ginsberg HN. Regulation of hepatic secretion of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins: information obtained from cultured liver cells. J Lipid Res.. 1993;34:167-179.[Abstract]
  43. Cianflone KM, Yasruel Z, Rodriguez MA, Vas D, Sniderman AD. Regulation of apoB secretion from HepG2 cells: Evidence for a critical role for cholesteryl ester synthesis in the response to a fatty acid challenge. J Lipid Res.. 1990;31:2045-2055.[Abstract]
  44. Tanaka M, Jingami H, Otani H, Cho M, Ueda Y, Arai H, Nagano Y, Doi T, Yokode M, Kita T. Regulation of apolipoprotein B production and secretion in response to the change of intracellular cholesteryl ester content in rabbit hepatocytes. J Biol Chem.. 1993;268:12713-12718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kam HPT, Albright E, Mathur SN, Field FJ. Effects of lovastatin on ACAT activity and the basolateral-membrane secretion of newly synthesized lipids by CaCo-2 cell. Biochem J.. 1990;272:427-433.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Lamon-Fava, M. R. Diffenderfer, P. H. R. Barrett, A. Buchsbaum, N. R. Matthan, A. H. Lichtenstein, G. G. Dolnikowski, K. Horvath, B. F. Asztalos, V. Zago, et al.
Effects of different doses of atorvastatin on human apolipoprotein B-100, B-48, and A-I metabolism
J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1746 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. S. Millar, M. E. Brousseau, M. R. Diffenderfer, P. Hugh, R. Barrett, F. K. Welty, A. Faruqi, M. L. Wolfe, C. Nartsupha, A. G. Digenio, et al.
Effects of the Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor Torcetrapib on Apolipoprotein B100 Metabolism in Humans
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2006; 26(6): 1350 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. N. Ginsberg
REVIEW: Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action of Statins in the Treatment of Diabetic Dyslipidemia
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 383 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
W. L. Isley, J. M. Miles, B. W. Patterson, and W. S. Harris
The effect of high-dose simvastatin on triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. Myerson, C. Ngai, J. Jones, S. Holleran, R. Ramakrishnan, L. Berglund, and H. N. Ginsberg
Treatment with high-dose simvastatin reduces secretion of apolipoprotein B-lipoproteins in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2735 - 2744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Bilz, S. Wagner, M. Schmitz, A. Bedynek, U. Keller, and T. Demant
Effects of atorvastatin versus fenofibrate on apoB-100 and apoA-I kinetics in mixed hyperlipidemia
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2004; 45(1): 174 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. Ouguerram, T. Magot, Y. Zair, J. S. Marchini, B. Charbonnel, H. Laouenan, and M. Krempf
Effect of Atorvastatin on Apolipoprotein B100 Containing Lipoprotein Metabolism in Type-2 Diabetes
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2003; 306(1): 332 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. C. Chan, G. F. Watts, P. H. R. Barrett, T. A. Mori, L. J. Beilin, and T. G. Redgrave
Mechanism of Action of a 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitor on Apolipoprotein B-100 Kinetics in Visceral Obesity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2283 - 2289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. J Schaefer
Lipoproteins, nutrition, and heart disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2002; 75(2): 191 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. Di Buono, P. J. H. Jones, L. Beaumier, and L. J. Wykes
Comparison of deuterium incorporation and mass isotopomer distribution analysis for measurement of human cholesterol biosynthesis
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2000; 41(9): 1516 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
H. Jiang, H. N. Ginsberg, and X. Wu
Glucose does not stimulate apoprotein B secretion from HepG2 cells because of insufficient stimulation of triglyceride synthesis
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 1998; 39(11): 2277 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cuchel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cuchel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, A. H.