Articles |
the Comparative Medicine Clinical Research Center, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
Correspondence to Michael R. Adams, DVM, Dept of Comparative Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1040. E-mail madams@cpm.bgsm.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: coronary artery atherosclerosis cynomolgus monkeys estrogen medroxyprogesterone acetate women's health
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although estrogen use is associated with reduced risk of CHD, its long-term use is associated with a marked increase in the risk of endometrial cancer. It is recommended that a progestin be taken with the estrogen to offset this effect. However, the impact of the coadministration of progestin on the cardioprotective effects of estrogen is unclear. Combined estrogen-progestin replacement has been in widespread use for a relatively short time, and convincing data on its cardiovascular effects are limited. Two studies with relevance to US prescribing practices (Reference 7 and M.J. Stampfer, MD, unpublished data, 1996) indicate that users of continuous CEE and sequential (7 to 14 days per month) MPA have a similar reduction in CHD risk compared with users of CEE alone. However, there are no data regarding the effects of combined, continuously administered replacement with CEE and MPA, a prescribing practice that has become widespread recently because of its inhibition of menstrual bleeding.
The progression of coronary artery atherosclerosis and its association with CHD risk variables are exceedingly difficult to study prospectively in human subjects. For this reason, we used a nonhuman primate model of atherosclerosis, the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis), to address questions regarding the effects of sex hormones on atherosclerosis. A series of studies has established the usefulness of the monkey model for this purpose. Relevant to the current report, we have found that surgically induced menopause (ovariectomy) results in accelerated progression of atherosclerosis.8 Furthermore, physiological estrogen replacement (17ß-estradiol administered by subcutaneous implant) of ovariectomized monkeys markedly inhibited atherosclerosis progression, whereas added physiological (cyclic) replacement of natural progesterone by subcutaneous implant had a neutral influence.9
We report here the effects of continuously administered CEE and MPA on the progression of diet-induced atherosclerosis in female cynomolgus monkeys.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Monkeys were ovariectomized and consumed the atherogenic diet for a 4-month preexperimental period. They were then assigned, by use of a stratified randomization scheme with pretreatment TPC and HDL cholesterol concentrations as stratification variables, to one of four experimental groups: untreated (surgically postmenopausal controls) (n=21); treated with CEE (Wyeth-Ayerst, Princeton, NJ) (n=25); treated with MPA (Cycrin; Wyeth-Ayerst) (n=19); or treated with CEE and MPA (n=26). Hormones were administered in the diet continuously for 30 months. As in previous studies, the difference in caloric intake between monkeys and human beings was used to calculate the appropriate dose for the monkeys, adjusted for differences in both body size and metabolic rate.10 On this basis, a 4-kg monkey received 0.17 mg CEE and/or 0.65 mg MPA. Plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and MPA were measured by radioimmunoassay of samples collected 2 hours after administration to verify that dosing resulted in plasma concentrations similar to those of women taking these compounds.
Risk Variables
TPC,11 triglycerides,12 and HDL cholesterol13 were determined at 3-month intervals. One month before treatment and at months 12 and 24, plasma lipoprotein patterns were assessed. Lipoprotein fractions were separated by ultracentrifugation and high-performance liquid chromatography,14 and the cholesterol content of each fraction was measured.15 In macaques, four major fractions are obtained. In addition to VLDL, LDL, and HDL, a fourth peak, IDL, intermediate in density to LDL and VLDL, is seen. Average LDL molecular weight was determined for each sample by including a trace amount of iodinated LDL of known molecular weight.16
Polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (4% to 30% gels; Pharmacia) was used 1 month before treatment and at months 12 and 24 to assess HDL subfraction size heterogeneity.17 Plasma concentrations of apo B18 and apo A-I19 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay 1 month before treatment and at months 12 and 24.
Fasting blood glucose20 and insulin21 were determined at months 12 and 24. Body weight was determined at 3-month intervals. Blood pressure was determined with the use of a Dinamap model 1245 Ultrasound Research Monitor (Critikon) and a pediatric cuff according to previously published methods22 at 6-month intervals.
Necropsy and Measurement of Atherosclerosis
At 30 months after randomization, the monkeys were anesthetized deeply with pentobarbital (30 mg/kg IV), and the cardiovascular system was flushed with normal saline. The heart was excised after ligation of the vena cava and pulmonary arteries and was perfusion fixed via the aorta with 4% paraformaldehyde at a pressure of 100 mm Hg. The heart was then immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After fixation, five serial tissue blocks were cut from each of the left circumflex, left anterior descending, and right coronary arteries. One section from each block was stained with Verhoeffvan Gieson's stain, sections were projected, and the cross-sectional area occupied by intimal lesion (plaque size), the area encompassed by the internal elastic lamina (artery size), and the lumen area were measured by use of a digitizer. Plaque size, artery size, and lumen area were expressed as the mean of the 15 sections of coronary arteries.
Statistical Analysis
To satisfy the linearity, homogeneity, and normality assumptions of the parametric statistical methods used, reduce skewness, and equalize group variances, all atherosclerosis data underwent square-root transformation before analysis. ANOVA, repeated-measures ANOVA, ANCOVA, multiple regression, and Pearson's product-moment correlation were used for the statistical analyses. Duncan's new multiple range test was used for post hoc comparisons. To increase the precision of the analyses, risk variable data for the treatment period were analyzed by use of ANCOVA with pretreatment values as the independent variable. The adjusted means produced by these analyses are reported in Tables 2 and 3![]()
. Statistical analyses were made with the use of BMDP statistical software (University of California).
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
TPC, HDL Cholesterol, and Triglycerides
Lipid data appear in Table 2
. These represent adjusted means, ie, means of all values for each animal for the 30-month treatment period adjusted for baseline (pretreatment) values in an ANCOVA. TPC was highest in the animals receiving MPA, although this group differed statistically only from animals in the CEE and CEE plus MPA groups. HDL cholesterol concentrations were reduced in all treatment groups. Total plasma triglyceride concentrations were increased an average of 135% in animals receiving CEE alone or combined with MPA.
Plasma Apolipoproteins
Plasma apo B concentrations were increased 45% in animals treated with CEE plus MPA relative to untreated controls and increased 22% relative to animals in the other two groups (Table 2
). Plasma apo A-I concentrations were reduced 22% and 28% in animals treated with MPA alone and CEE plus MPA, respectively, and were 21% lower in animals treated with CEE plus MPA relative to animals treated with CEE alone (Table 2
).
Plasma Lipoprotein Patterns
These data are summarized in Table 3
. Changes in plasma LDL cholesterol paralleled changes in TPC, although none were significant statistically. However, average LDL molecular weight was reduced 10% in animals receiving CEE plus MPA and 14% in animals receiving CEE alone. Changes in plasma HDL cholesterol, as assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography, were similar to those shown in Table 2
. Plasma VLDL plus IDL cholesterol was reduced 53% in animals treated with CEE alone relative to untreated controls. In animals treated with CEE plus MPA, VLDL plus IDL cholesterol was reduced 37% relative to animals treated with MPA alone.
Treatment with CEE plus MPA resulted in marked changes in heterogeneity of HDL subfraction sizes. HDL2a and HDL2b subfractions were reduced 22% and 49%, respectively, whereas HDL3b and HDL3c subfractions were increased 118% and 50% relative to untreated controls (all P<.05). Treatment with CEE alone resulted in qualitatively similar changes in heterogeneity of HDL subfraction sizes, although the magnitude of effect was less marked. In these animals, HDL2b was reduced 30% whereas HDL3b was increased 63% (for both, P<.05 versus controls).
Blood Pressure and Carbohydrate Metabolism
Blood pressure was not affected by treatment. Effects of treatment on fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were apparent in animals treated with MPA alone. In these animals, plasma glucose was increased 19% (P<.05) and plasma insulin was increased 68% (P<.05) relative to untreated controls at month 12. This effect was not apparent at month 24.
Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis
Treatment with CEE alone resulted in a marked decrease in the extent of coronary artery atherosclerosis (F3,87=4.86, P<.004) (Figure
). Average plaque size was reduced by 72% relative to untreated controls, 74% relative to monkeys treated with MPA, and 63% relative to animals treated with CEE and MPA (for all, P<.05 versus controls). These three treatment groups (control, MPA, and CEE plus MPA) did not differ from one another.
|
Risk Variables as Predictors of Atherosclerosis Extent
Using multiple regression analysis, we determined that TPC was a significant predictor of coronary artery atherosclerosis and accounted for 44% of the variability in lesion size. Therefore, TPC was used as a covariate in an ANCOVA to determine if it accounted for effects of treatment on atherosclerosis. Adjusted values are shown in the Figure
. A significant effect of treatment persisted (F3,87=2.67, P<.05), and relationships among groups were unchanged; atherosclerosis extent was decreased 47% to 56% in CEE-treated monkeys relative to the other three groups (all P<.05), which, in turn, did not differ from each other. Thus, effects of treatment on atherosclerosis progression are unexplained by effects on risk variables measured in this study.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the atheroprotective effects of estrogens are well established, the influence of the coadministration of a progestin, necessary for the prevention of endometrial cancer, is unclear. Limited observational data indicate that CHD risk in users of combined CEE and sequentially administered MPA (7 to 14 days per month) is similar to that of users of CEE alone.7 27 However, there are no observational data for users of combined, continuously administered CEE and MPA. The experimental data described herein indicate that MPA administered continuously antagonizes the atheroprotective effect of CEE alone. This is in contrast to the results of a previous study in which the parenteral administration of progesterone sequentially (alternating months) had no influence on the atheroinhibitory effect of parenterally administered estradiol.9 The reasons for these contrasting results are not clear; however, we speculate that they may relate to differences between the two progestins in potency, route of administration (oral versus parenteral), or pattern of administration (continuous versus sequential). Among other physiological functions, progestins act as antiestrogens. Thus, it is perhaps not surprising that MPA (a potent synthetic progestin) given orally and continuously for 30 months had substantial antiestrogenic effects, whereas a natural progestin, progesterone, administered parenterally and sequentially did not.
Although plasma lipoprotein patterns were substantially affected by CEE, with and without MPA, these effects did not appear to explain substantially the effects of hormone-replacement therapy on CHD risk28 or coronary artery atherosclerosis.9 Similarly, the antagonistic effect of MPA on atherosclerosis remains unaccounted for statistically by plasma lipoproteins. Nonetheless, it remains possible that aspects of plasma lipoproteins not assessed in the present study (eg, effects on the metabolism or compositional heterogeneity of lipoprotein fractions) may play a role.
Evidence continues to accumulate regarding the existence of atheroprotective effects of estrogen mediated at the level of the artery wall. Using the macaque model, we have found that certain estrogens (ie, esterified estrogens; Solvay Pharmaceuticals) and estrogen-progestin combinations (ie, estradiol-progesterone, ethinyl estradiollevonorgestrel) inhibit the arterial uptake and catabolism of plasma LDL.29 30 This represents a means by which estrogen may directly inhibit arterial cholesterol accumulation as well as atherosclerosis initiation and/or progression. These data also suggest that some progestins do not antagonize the inhibitory effects of estrogen on arterial uptake and catabolism of LDL. The effects of MPA on this process remain unclear.
Sex hormones may influence other cellular or molecular processes occurring in arterial intima implicated in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. There is plentiful evidence that sex hormones are modulators of immune and inflammatory processes, localized variations of which have been implicated in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis.31 32 Evidence supporting direct effects on these localized inflammatory/proliferative processes of the artery wall is somewhat limited and largely confined to results from studies of cultured cells. Nonetheless, several studies have implicated estrogens as modulators of the expression of inflammatory mediators and growth factors.33 34 35 36 37 38 Although the effects of progestins on these atherogenic processes remain unknown, it seems likely that antiestrogenic effects of some progestins or forms of administration of progestins may antagonize directly the antiatherogenic effects of estrogen.
Sex hormones also may influence the initiation or progression of atherosclerosis by modulating arterial vasomotor responsiveness. It is now clear that estrogen can reverse the atherosclerosis-related impairment of coronary artery vasodilator function in both monkeys39 40 and women.41 42 Although the mechanisms involved in this vasodilator effect are uncertain, the available evidence suggests that estrogen acts by augmenting the production, release, or viability of nitric oxide.43 44 45 46 Progestins antagonize estrogen-induced increases in blood flow and vasodilation in normal (nonatherosclerotic) animals.47 Recently, we48 have shown that MPA, administered either cyclically or continuously, causes partial antagonism of the CEE-induced augmentation of coronary vasodilator responsiveness and complete antagonism of the estrogen-induced augmentation of coronary flow reserve in female monkeys with diet-induced atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis-related coronary vasospasm, which represents impairment of vasodilator responses or augmentation of vasoconstrictor responses, can lead to accelerated progression of atherosclerosis, plaque instability or rupture, thrombosis, and myocardial infarction.49 50 51 Although estrogen treatment preserves vasodilator function and may thereby retard atherosclerosis progression and reduce the risk of clinical ischemic events, experimental evidence indicates that MPA antagonizes this cardioprotective effect of estrogen48 and thus may counteract the benefits of estrogen.
Regardless of mechanism, we conclude that CEE and other estrogens inhibit the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. However, in the current study, the coadministration of continuously administered MPA completely antagonized the antiatherosclerotic effect of CEE. This result contrasts with the findings of a previous study9 in which progesterone administered parenterally and sequentially had a neutral influence on the antiatherosclerotic effects of parenterally administered estradiol. The results indicate that some progestins have antiestrogenic influences on the cardiovascular system that may depend on potency, dose, route (oral versus parenteral), or pattern (continuous versus sequential) of administration. Furthermore, some forms of progestin coadministration may antagonize the favorable cardiovascular effects of estrogen.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 22, 1996;
revision received May 22, 1996;
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X.-D. Fu, M. Flamini, A. M. Sanchez, L. Goglia, M. S. Giretti, A. R. Genazzani, and T. Simoncini Progestogens regulate endothelial actin cytoskeleton and cell movement via the actin-binding protein moesin Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 14(4): 225 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Meendering, B. N. Torgrimson, N. P. Miller, P. F. Kaplan, and C. T. Minson Estrogen, medroxyprogesterone acetate, endothelial function, and biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in young women Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1630 - H1637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schumacher, R. Guennoun, A. Ghoumari, C. Massaad, F. Robert, M. El-Etr, Y. Akwa, K. Rajkowski, and E.-E. Baulieu Novel Perspectives for Progesterone in Hormone Replacement Therapy, with Special Reference to the Nervous System Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2007; 28(4): 387 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Hormones and cardiovascular health in women Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 483 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ouyang, E. D. Michos, and R. H. Karas Hormone Replacement Therapy and the Cardiovascular System: Lessons Learned and Unanswered Questions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1741 - 1753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wassmann, S. Wassmann, and G. Nickenig Progesterone Antagonizes the Vasoprotective Effect of Estrogen on Antioxidant Enzyme Expression and Function Circ. Res., November 11, 2005; 97(10): 1046 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Mishra, R. K. Hermsmeyer, K. Miyagawa, P. Sarrel, B. Uchida, F. Z. Stanczyk, K. A. Burry, D. R. Illingworth, and F. J. Nordt Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Dihydrotestosterone Induce Coronary Hyperreactivity in Intact Male Rhesus Monkeys J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3706 - 3714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hermenegildo, P.J. Oviedo, M.C. Garcia-Martinez, M.A. Garcia-Perez, J.J. Tarin, and A. Cano Progestogens stimulate prostacyclin production by human endothelial cells Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1554 - 1561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Register, J. A. Cann, J. R. Kaplan, J. K. Williams, M. R. Adams, T. M. Morgan, M. S. Anthony, R. M. Blair, J. D. Wagner, and T. B. Clarkson Effects of Soy Isoflavones and Conjugated Equine Estrogens on Inflammatory Markers in Atherosclerotic, Ovariectomized Monkeys J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1734 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. V. Nair, D. Waters, W. Rogers, G. J. Kowalchuk, T. D. Stuckey, and D. M. Herrington Pulse Pressure and Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression in Postmenopausal Women Hypertension, January 1, 2005; 45(1): 53 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Adams, J. K. Williams, J. R. Kaplan, K. K. Koh, and I. Sakuma Estrogens, Progestins, and Atherosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2004; 24(11): e190 - e191. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh and I. Sakuma Should Progestins Be Blamed for the Failure of Hormone Replacement Therapy to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Randomized Controlled Trials? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(7): 1171 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Duvernoy, J. Martin, K. Briesmiester, A. Bargardi, O. Muzik, and L. Mosca Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve in Response to Hormone Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Risk Factors for Coronary Disease J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2783 - 2788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Hermsmeyer, R. G. Mishra, D. Pavcnik, B. Uchida, M. K. Axthelm, F. Z. Stanczyk, K. A. Burry, D. R. Illingworth, J. C. Kaski, and F. J. Nordt Prevention of Coronary Hyperreactivity in Preatherogenic Menopausal Rhesus Monkeys by Transdermal Progesterone Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(5): 955 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, M. Grogli, H. J. Kloosterboer, and B. Imthurn Tibolone and Its Metabolites Induce Antimitogenesis in Human Coronary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells: Role of Estrogen, Progesterone, and Androgen Receptors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 852 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Greenwood and R. Parasuraman Normal Genetic Variation, Cognition, and Aging Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, December 1, 2003; 2(4): 278 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fitzpatrick Hormones and the Heart: Controversies and Conundrums J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5609 - 5610. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. N. Hodis, W. J. Mack, S. P. Azen, R. A. Lobo, D. Shoupe, P. R. Mahrer, D. P. Faxon, L. Cashin-Hemphill, M. E. Sanmarco, W. J. French, et al. Hormone Therapy and the Progression of Coronary-Artery Atherosclerosis in Postmenopausal Women N. Engl. J. Med., August 7, 2003; 349(6): 535 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Krajewski, T. W. Abel, M. L. Voytko, and N. E. Rance Ovarian Steroids Differentially Modulate the Gene Expression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neuronal Subtypes in the Ovariectomized Cynomolgus Monkey J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 655 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Kuller Hormone Replacement Therapy and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Implications of the Results of the Women's Health Initiative Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 11 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Hodgin and N. Maeda Minireview: Estrogen and Mouse Models of Atherosclerosis Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4495 - 4501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Clarkson, M. S. Anthony, T. S. Mikkola, and R. W. St Clair Comparison of Tibolone and Conjugated Equine Estrogens Effects on Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis of Postmenopausal Monkeys Stroke, November 1, 2002; 33(11): 2700 - 2703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. McNeill, C. Zhang, F. Z. Stanczyk, S. P. Duckles, and D. N. Krause Estrogen Increases Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase via Estrogen Receptors in Rat Cerebral Blood Vessels: Effect Preserved After Concurrent Treatment With Medroxyprogesterone Acetate or Progesterone Stroke, June 1, 2002; 33(6): 1685 - 1691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S Mikkola and T. B Clarkson Estrogen replacement therapy, atherosclerosis, and vascular function Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 605 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. N. Hodis, W. J. Mack, R. A. Lobo, D. Shoupe, A. Sevanian, P. R. Mahrer, R. H. Selzer, C.-r. Liu, C.-h. Liu, S. P. Azen, et al. Estrogen in the Prevention of Atherosclerosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Ann Intern Med, December 4, 2001; 135(11): 939 - 953. |