Articles |
From the Institut für Arterioskleroseforschung an der Universität Münster (Y.H., S.W., G.A.) and the Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin, Zentrallaboratorium, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (A. von E., G.A.), Germany.
Correspondence to Yadong Huang, Institut für Arterioskleroseforschung an der Universität Münster, Domagkstr 3, D-48149 Münster, Federal Republic of Germany.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-mobility and less abundant particles
with electrophoretic pre-ß-mobility (preß1LpA-I,
preß2LpA-I, preß3LpA-I).
Immunodetection with antiapoA-II antibodies identifies a single
particle with
-mobility. To differentiate
-migrating HDL without
apo A-II (
LpA-I) from those with apoA-II (
LpA-I/A-II), we
combined 2D-PAGGE with immunoadsorption of apoA-II. Incubation of
plasma with [3H]cholesterol-labeled
fibroblasts in combination with immunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE allowed us
to analyze the role of
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II in the
uptake and esterification of cell-derived cholesterol in
native plasma. Depending on the duration of incubations with cells,
-LpA-I took up two to four times more
[3H]cholesterol than
LpA-I/A-II.
Irrespective of the duration of incubation, two to three times more
[3H]cholesteryl esters accumulated in
LpA-I than in
LpA-I/A-II. Subsequent incubations in the presence of an
inhibitor of lecithin:cholesterol
acyltransferase led to preferential accumulation of
[3H]cholesteryl esters in
LpA-I/A-II. In conclusion,
our data indicate that
LpA-I is more effective than
LpA-I/A-II in both uptake and esterification of cell-derived
cholesterol. Moreover,
LpA-I/A-II appears to
accumulate cholesteryl esters, at least partially, from
LpA-I.
Key Words: apoA-II HDL subclasses reverse cholesterol transport cholesterol efflux
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2D-PAGGE of plasma in the sequence agarose gel electrophoresis
polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis, and subsequent
immunoblotting, differentiates HDL subclasses according to
antigenicity, charge, and size.5 12 13 Immunodetection
with antiapoA-I antibodies distinguishes preß1LpA-I,
preß2LpA-I, preß3LpA-I, and
LpA-I,12 13 14 and immunodetection with anti-apoE
antibodies distinguishes
-LpE and
-LpE.5
Immunodetection with antiapoA-II detects a single particle with
-mobility called
LpA-II.5 In combination with
prior incubation of plasma with cells that have been labeled with large
amounts of [3H]cholesterol, 2D-PAGGE has
helped to unravel the roles of different HDL subclasses in reverse
cholesterol transport. Recently, this method has identified
two quantitatively minor HDL subclasses as initial acceptors of
cell-derived cholesterol, namely,
preß1LpA-I, which contains apoA-I as the only
apolipoprotein,12 13 and
-LpE, which contains apoE as
the only apolipoprotein.15 After uptake by
preß1LpA-I, cell-derived cholesterol is
further transferred via preß2LpA-I,
preß3LpA-I, and
-migrating HDL to
LDL.12 13 15 A proportion of cell-derived
cholesterol is esterified during its passage through
preß3LpA-I, and another in
-migrating HDL after
being recycled from LDL.13 16 17
In contrast to immunoaffinity chromatography, 2D-PAGGE
does not depend on the prior isolation of lipoproteins and may hence be
less affected by artifacts. However, since LpA-I/A-II and the majority
of LpA-I exhibit electrophoretic
-mobility and do not differ in
size,5 we modified 2D-PAGGE to allow us to differentiate
the role of LpA-I and LpA-I/A-II in reverse cholesterol
transport. Plasma proteins were first separated by agarose gel
electrophoresis. The gel strip was then transferred to a PAGGE gel
covered with an antiapoA-II antiserum containing agarose gel. By this
immunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE, we could investigate native plasma in
regard to the different roles of LpA-I and LpA-I/A-II in reverse
cholesterol transport.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Quantification of Lipids, Apolipoproteins, and HDL
Subfractions
Serum concentrations of triglycerides and
cholesterol were quantified enzymatically with an
autoanalyzer (Hitachi/Boehringer). HDL
cholesterol was measured after precipitation of
apoB-containing lipoproteins with phosphotungstic
acid/MgCl2 (Boehringer Mannheim).19
LDL cholesterol was calculated from the Friedewald
formula.20 Concentrations of apoA-I, apoA-II, and apoB
were determined with a modified commercially available turbidimetric
assay (Boehringer Mannheim).21 LpA-I was
quantified with a commercially available differential
electroimmunoassay (Hydragel LpA-I, Sebia).22 The
concentration of LpA-I/A-II was calculated as the difference between
total apoA-I and LpA-I.23 LCAT activity was determined as
the esterification of [3H]cholesterol that
was incorporated into apoA-Icontaining
proteoliposomes.24 ApoA-I was isolated from HDL by fast
protein liquid chromatography with a MonoQ5-column
(Pharmacia) as the immobile phase. ApoA-I was eluted within 32 minutes
with a linear gradient of buffer A (15 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 10 mmol/L
NaCl2, and 5 mol/L urea, pH 7.2) and buffer B (15
mmol/L Tris-HCl, 1 mol/L NaCl2, and 5 mol/L urea, pH
7.2) as the mobile phase.
Cell Culture
Normal human skin fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum in dishes of
3.5-cm diameter as described previously.25 At the state of
near confluence, fibroblasts were labeled for 72 hours at 37°C with
0.5 mCi (1,2-3H)-cholesterol (New England
Nuclear; 51.7 Ci/mmol) that had been complexed with fetal calf serum.
The final specific radioactivity in the labeled cells amounted to
1.3±0.4x107 cpm/mg cell UC (mean±SD).
Nondenaturing Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis
The distribution of apoA-I and apoA-IIcontaining
lipoproteins in normal plasma was analyzed by 2D-PAGGE in which
agarose gel electrophoresis was followed by PAGGE.12 13
Briefly, in the first dimension, 20 µL of plasma samples was
separated by electrophoresis at 4°C in a 0.75% agarose gel with a 50
mmol/L merbital buffer (pH 8.7, Serva). Bromphenol blue was added to a
standard sample to visualize albumin in the native gel. The
electrophoresis was stopped when the albumin/bromphenol blue
marker had migrated 6 cm. Agarose gel strips containing the
preseparated lipoproteins were then transferred to a 2% to 20%
polyacrylamide gradient gel. Separation in the second dimension
was performed at 40 mA for 4 to 5 hours at 10°C. During this time,
the endogenous plasma albumin, which because of
bromphenol blue added to the cathodic buffer (300 µL/L buffer) was
visible in the native gel as a faint blue band, had migrated 10 cm. The
proteins separated in the polyacrylamide gradient gel were
electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. ApoA-I and
apoA-IIcontaining lipoproteins were detected by use of sheep
antibodies against human apoA-I or human apoA-II (Boehringer
Mannheim), respectively, which had been biotinylated according to the
manufacturer's recommendations (Sigma), and streptavidinbiotinylated
horseradish peroxidase complex (Amersham).
Differentiation of
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II by
Immunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE
To analyze
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II separately, we
modified the 2D-PAGGE procedure described above. Agarose gel
electrophoresis was followed by immunosubtracting electrophoresis in a
2% to 20% polyacrylamide gradient gel covered by a 4-cm-broad
0.6% agarose gel that contained the
-globulin fraction of an
anti-apoA-II antiserum (Boehringer Mannheim) at a final
concentration of 4% (vol/vol). This gel immunoprecipitates all
apoA-IIcontaining lipoproteins, so that LpA-I but not LpA-I/A-II
migrated into the polyacrylamide gel. Electrophoresis and
Western blotting were performed under the conditions described for
2D-PAGGE. Complete removal of LpA-I/A-II was ascertained by
antiapoA-II immunoblotting. In control experiments, LpA-I/A-II and
LpA-I were separated by 2D-PAGGE using polyacrylamide gradient
gels covered with a 4-cm-broad agarose gel without antiserum.
Cholesterol Efflux Experiments
To determine the cholesterol efflux from cells into
the different lipoprotein subtractions, 1 mL plasma was incubated for
different time intervals with
[3H]cholesterol-labeled fibroblasts that had
been washed six times with PBS (pH 7.4). To separately determine
cholesterol efflux into
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II, 10
µL labeled plasma was separated either by antiapoA-II
immunosubtractive 2D-PAGGE (for
LpA-I) or by 2D-PAGGE (for
LpA-I plus
LpA-I/A-II). In parallel, an aliquot of 10 µL
unlabeled plasma of the same donor was run in the same gel. After
completion of 2D-PAGGE, one half of the gel containing the labeled
sample was stored at 4°C. Proteins of the other half of the gel were
electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane to immunolocalize
apoA-Icontaining lipoproteins. This immunoblot was then used as a
template to localize preß1LpA-I,
LpA-I, and
LpA-I/A-II plus
LpA-I in the native gels. These lipoproteins
were cut out, and their lipids were extracted by incubation with
chloroform/methanol (2:1) for 72 hours. In some experiments, UC
and CEs were separated by thin-layer chromatography
using silica gel plates (Merck) as the immobile phase and hexane:ether
6:4 (vol/vol) as the mobile phase. The radioactivity in lipids, UC,
and CEs was counted by scintillation chromatography.
The radioactivity of
-migrating particles in
antiapoA-IIimmunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE was assigned to
LpA-I;
the radioactivity of
-migrating particles in 2D-PAGGE was assigned
to
LpA-I plus
LpA-I/A-II. The difference between the
radioactivities in these two
HDLs was assigned to
LpA-I/A-II.
Every experiment was performed at least three times with different
plasma aliquots of each of the three donors (Table
). For every
experiment, separate dishes with labeled fibroblasts were used.
Interassay coefficients of variation in the recovery of radioactivity
in the various lipoproteins of a specific plasma were below 20%. As
reported previously,18 79% to 86% of the radioactivity
in apoB-free plasma was recovered in apoA-Icontaining HDL
subfractions separated by 2D-PAGGE.
General Procedures
Protein concentrations were measured according to the method of
Lowry et al26 with BSA as the standard. The data were
calculated as mean±SD. In some instances, percent values are
presented. They represent the amount of radioactivity
in one particle as the percentage of total radioactivity in
preß1LpA-1+
LpA-I+
LpA-I/A-II.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-mobility as well as in three minor subfractions with
pre-ß-mobility, which differ by their size
(preß1LpA-I, preß2LpA-I, and
preß3LpA-I) (Fig 1a
-mobility and is entirely colocalized with the
-migrating apoA-Icontaining particle (Fig 1b
LpA-I/A-II.
|
Differentiation of
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II in Normal Plasma
by Immunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE
LpA-I was separated from
LpA-I/A-II by
antiapoA-IIimmunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE (Fig 2
). Under
these conditions, apoA-I remained immunodetectable in particles with
either pre-ß- or
-mobility (Fig 2a
). The complete removal of
apoA-IIcontaining particles, ie,
LpA-I/A-II, was confirmed by
antiapoA-II immunoblotting (Fig 2b
; compare Fig 2d
). The staining of
the
-migrating apoA-Icontaining particle, ie,
LpA-I,
was less intense than that of
LpA-I plus
LpA-I/A-II in
the nonimmunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE (Fig 2c
). By contrast, the optical
density of preß1LpA-I and preß2LpA-I
did not differ between the two experiments (Fig 2a
and 2c
). These
results suggested that antiapoA-IIimmunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE can be
used as a rapid method for separating
LpA-I from
LpA-I/A-II.
|
Cholesterol Efflux From Cells Into
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II Determined by Immunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE
Fig 3
presents the distribution of
radioactive cholesterol in various lipoproteins of normal
plasma after 1 minute of incubation with
[3H]cholesterol-labeled fibroblasts (open
bars) and 1 minute of incubation without cells (hatched bars). After
both nonimmunosubtractive 2D-PAGGE (Fig 3a
) and
antiapoA-IIimmunosubtractive 2D-PAGGE (Fig 3b
), identical amounts
of radioactivity were recovered in preß1LpA-I. This
suggests that antiapoA-IIimmunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE does not affect
the cholesterol efflux into preß1LpA-I.
Significantly different amounts, however, were recovered in
LpA-I
plus
LpA-I/A-II (Fig 3a
) and
LpA-I (Fig 3b
). After 1 minute
of incubation with radiolabeled cells, the percentage of
[3H]cholesterol in
preß1LpA-I,
LpA-I, and
LpA-I/A-II amounted to
30%, 55%, and 15%, respectively. After a further 1-minute incubation
of plasma in the absence of cells, the radioactivity in
preß1LpA-I decreased to 5% and simultaneously
increased in
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II to 72% and 23%,
respectively (Fig 3c
). These results demonstrate that
preß1LpA-I and
LpA-I are more potent acceptors of
cell-derived cholesterol than
LpA-I/A-II. The results
of the incubations without cells also demonstrate that the transfer of
cholesterol from initial acceptors to
LpA-I is more
efficient than that to
LpA-I/A-II.
|
During prolonged incubation with
[3H]cholesterol-labeled cells, the
radioactivity in preß1LpA-I increased little after the
first minute (Fig 4a
). By contrast, the radioactivity
continued to increase in both
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II (Fig 4b
).
During the initial 5 minutes, the radioactivity in
LpA-I was
threefold to fourfold higher than in
LpA-I/A-II. After more than
10 minutes of incubation, the amounts of radioactive
cholesterol in
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II differed by a
factor of two. The ratio of 2:1 between the radioactivity in
LpA-I and that in
LpA-I/A-II remained unchanged up to 1 hour
of incubation (data not shown). These data underline that
LpA-I is
more effective in taking up cell-derived cholesterol than
is
LpA-I/A-II.
|
Esterification of Cell-Derived Cholesterol in
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II
Fig 5
shows the appearance of radioactive CEs in
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II after incubation of plasma with
[3H]cholesterol-labeled fibroblasts for
different time intervals. At any incubation time up to 1 hour, the
amounts of radioactive CEs in
LpA-I were twofold to threefold
higher than in
LpA-I/A-II.
|
Transfer of Radioactive CEs From
LpA-I to
LpA-I/A-II
To investigate the transfer of radioactive CEs from
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II, we first incubated plasma with
[3H]cholesterol-labeled fibroblasts for 20
minutes. After incubation, the samples were removed, supplemented with
2 mmol/L of the LCAT inhibitor DTNB, and then incubated in
the absence of cells for different time intervals. After 20 minutes of
incubation with radiolabeled cells, the amounts of radioactive CEs in
LpA-I was about twofold higher than in
LpA-I/A-II. During the
subsequent incubation of plasma in the absence of cells, radioactive
CEs decreased gradually in
LpA-I and increased slightly in
LpA-I/A-II (Fig 6
). After
30 minutes, the amount
of [3H]CEs was significantly higher than the initial
amount (P<.05, Student's t test).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LpE, since it allows the
analysis of native plasma without prior isolation of
lipoproteins.12 13 15 27 28 29 However, a major drawback of
2D-PAGGE is that it fails to distinguish between the components of the
bulk fraction of HDL that has electrophoretic
-mobility and is
heterogeneous in its apolipoprotein composition. For
example, sequential immunoaffinity chromatography
differentiates apoA-Icontaining particles with apoA-II, ie,
LpA-I/A-II, from those without apoA-II, ie, LpA-I.6 30 31 32
Studies with isolated lipoproteins yielded inconclusive data on the
role of LpA-I and LpA-I/A-II in reverse cholesterol
transport.5 7 8 9 10 30 31 32 Some authors have found that LpA-I
but not LpA-I/A-II promotes cholesterol
efflux,7 8 while others have found no differences between
these particles.9 10 These discrepancies have been
attributed to possible differences in the regulation of
cholesterol homeostasis in various cells30 and
to artifactual changes in the composition of isolated
lipoproteins.11 In this study, we combined 2D-PAGGE with
an immunoadsorption step that helped us to differentiate
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II. In combination with incubations of plasma with
radiolabeled cells, antiapoA-II immunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE has at
least two advantages over sequential immunoaffinity
chromatography: First, it allows analysis of
small volumes of plasma from different individuals. Second, it allows
direct comparison of the cholesterol efflux abilities of
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II in native plasma. Thereby, artifactual
changes in lipoprotein composition caused by the isolation procedure
are avoided. Moreover, the potential influence of additional plasma
factors on the role of
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II in reverse
cholesterol transport is also monitored. Using
immunosubtracting 2D-PAGGE, we actually provide further evidence for
different roles of
LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II in reverse
cholesterol transport.
The rapid uptake of [3H]cholesterol during
incubation of plasma with radiolabeled cells and the rapid loss of
[3H]cholesterol during incubations without
cells has once more confirmed that preß1LpA-I is an
initial acceptor of cellular cholesterol.12 13
During incubations either with or without cells, two to four times more
radioactivity accumulated in
LpA-I than in
LpA-I/A-II (Fig 3
). One may argue that the enhanced accumulation of radioactivity in
LpA-I simply reflects nonproductive exchange between
labeled cholesterol in cell membranes and unlabeled
cholesterol in plasma lipoproteins. However, although a
single LpA-I particle contains 10% to 60% more UC than a single
LpA-I/A-II particle, LpA-I/A-II particles are present in plasma at
a higher number and account for 1.4- to 2.6-fold more UC in
plasma.33 34 35 36 Thus, since our experiments have been
performed on total plasma, nonproductive equilibration of
labeled and unlabeled cholesterol as the only basis of
[3H]cholesterol efflux from cells would have
led to the preferential accumulation of radiolabel in LpA-I/A-II.
Therefore, our data indicate that
LpA-I is the more effective
contributor to cholesterol efflux. This is in agreement
with data reported by de la Llera Moya and colleagues,11
who determined the "cholesterol efflux potential" of
serum using Fu5AH rat hepatoma cells in a 4-hour incubation. They found
that cholesterol efflux is more closely correlated with
LpA-I (r=.57) than with LpA-I/A-II (r=.26).
Comparing the regression coefficients, they suggested that the
cholesterol efflux potential of LpA-I is double that of
LpA-I/A-II. This estimation is in agreement with the data we obtained
by incubations for longer than 10 minutes (Fig 4
).
In this study, we found that incubation of plasma with
[3H]cholesterol-labeled fibroblasts leads to
the accumulation of twofold to threefold more [3H]CEs in
LpA-I than in
LpA-I/A-II (Fig 5
). Previously, Francone et
al16 and Miida et al17 reported that
cell-derived cholesterol is esterified predominantly in
preß3LpA-I, whereas LDL-derived cholesterol
is esterified in
LpA-I. We recently showed that only a minor
proportion of cell-derived cholesterol is esterified
directly during its passage through preß3LpA-I, whereas
the majority is transferred to LDL without prior esterification, then
to be recycled to
LpA-I for esterification.13 In view
of these conflicting views, the pronounced accumulation of
[3H]CEs in
LpA-I may be the result of either
preferential uptake of CEs from preß3LpA-I or
preferential esterification in
LpA-I. The latter explanation is in
agreement with the previous observation that LpA-I contains more LCAT
than LpA-I/A-II.30 37 Since esterification of
cholesterol in the plasma compartment is considered to be
the driving force for net cholesterol efflux, probably by
maintaining a cholesterol concentration gradient between
plasma membranes and lipoprotein surfaces,38 39 40 the more
effective esterification of cholesterol in
LpA-I is
one possible explanation for the better ability of
LpA-I to take
up cellular cholesterol. In agreement with this model, Ohta
and colleagues37 found that the higher ability of LpA-I to
promote cholesterol efflux from macrophages is
associated with its higher content of LCAT compared with
LpA-I/A-II.
Incubations of plasma in the presence of an LCAT inhibitor
revealed that
LpA-I serves as a net donor of CEs to other
lipoproteins, whereas
LpA-I/A-II serves as a net acceptor of CEs
(Fig 6
). Our data do not allow us to conclude whether
LpA-I/A-II
receives CEs from
LpA-I or from other lipoproteins that are
involved in the esterification of cholesterol, such as
preß3LpA-I. Miida and colleagues17
reported that CEs or preß3LpA-I are transferred to a
subgroup of
-HDL, from which they are less available for
CETP-mediated transfer to LDL. By contrast, CEs that are generated from
LDL-derived cholesterol in another subgroup of
-HDL
appear to be much more available for transfer by CETP.17
These observations raise the interesting question of whether
LpA-I/A-II corresponds to this sink for CEs, which are generated
in preß3LpA-I. Since transfer of CEs to apoB-containing
lipoproteins is considered to be the most important pathway for the
catabolism of HDL cholesterol in men,2 3 since
LpA-I/A-II is catabolized more slowly than LpA-I,21 and
since CEs in LpA-I/A-II are less available for selective uptake by the
liver41 and hydrolysis by hepatic
lipase,42 43 the accumulation of CEs in
LpA-I/A-II
may indicate a delayed catabolism of CEs and, thereby, impaired reverse
cholesterol transport.
In summary, our studies on reverse cholesterol transport in
native plasma have demonstrated that
LpA-I is more effective than
LpA-I/A-II in both uptake and esterification of cell-derived
cholesterol. Moreover, CEs are transferred from
LpA-I
to other lipoproteins but accumulate in
LpA-I/A-II. Future studies
will have to prove whether this accumulation of CEs in
LpA-I/A-II
implies impaired reverse cholesterol transport. Such a
negative role of apoA-II is reflected by the previous observations that
mice overexpressing either murine apoA-II or both human apoA-I and
human apoA-II are more susceptible to diet-induced
atherosclerosis than control mice and human apoA-I
transgenic mice, respectively.44 45
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 21, 1995; accepted June 9, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. M. Ooi, G. F. Watts, P. J. Nestel, D. Sviridov, A. Hoang, and P. H. R. Barrett Dose-Dependent Regulation of High-Density Lipoprotein Metabolism with Rosuvastatin in the Metabolic Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Delgado-Lista, F. Perez-Jimenez, T. Tanaka, P. Perez-Martinez, Y. Jimenez-Gomez, C. Marin, J. Ruano, L. Parnell, J. M. Ordovas, and J. Lopez-Miranda An Apolipoprotein A-II Polymorphism (-265T/C, rs5082) Regulates Postprandial Response to a Saturated Fat Overload in Healthy Men J. Nutr., September 1, 2007; 137(9): 2024 - 2028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ji, G. F. Watts, A. G. Johnson, D. C. Chan, E. M. M. Ooi, K.-A. Rye, A. P. Serone, and P. H. R. Barrett High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Transport in the Metabolic Syndrome: Application of a New Model for HDL Particle Kinetics J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 973 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fournier, A. Cogny, V. Atger, D. Pastier, D. Goudouneche, A. Nicoletti, N. Moatti, J. Chambaz, J.-L. Paul, and A.-D. Kalopissis Opposite Effects of Plasma From Human Apolipoprotein A-II Transgenic Mice on Cholesterol Efflux From J774 Macrophages and Fu5AH Hepatoma Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2002; 22(4): 638 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Saucan and E. A. Brinton Lp A-I and Niacin: New Views of an Antiatherogenic Duo Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2001; 21(11): 1707 - 1709. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. van 't Hooft, G. Ruotolo, S. Boquist, U. de Faire, G. Eggertsen, and A. Hamsten Human Evidence That the Apolipoprotein A-II Gene Is Implicated in Visceral Fat Accumulation and Metabolism of Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins Circulation, September 11, 2001; 104(11): 1223 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tailleux, M. Bouly, G. Luc, G. Castro, J.-M. Caillaud, N. Hennuyer, P. Poulain, J.-C. Fruchart, N. Duverger, and C. Fievet Decreased Susceptibility to Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis in Human Apolipoprotein A-II Transgenic Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(11): 2453 - 2458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jauhiainen, J. Huuskonen, M. Baumann, J. Metso, T. Oka, T. Egashira, H. Hattori, V. M. Olkkonen, and C. Ehnholm Phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) causes proteolytic cleavage of apolipoprotein A-I J. Lipid Res., April 1, 1999; 40(4): 654 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lee, A. von Eckardstein, L. Lindstedt, G. Assmann, and P. T. Kovanen Depletion of Preß1LpA1 and LpA4 Particles by Mast Cell Chymase Reduces Cholesterol Efflux From Macrophage Foam Cells Induced by Plasma Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 1999; 19(4): 1066 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ribeiro, D. Pastier, D. Kardassis, J. Chambaz, and P. Cardot Cooperative Binding of Upstream Stimulatory Factor and Hepatic Nuclear Factor 4 Drives the Transcription of the Human Apolipoprotein A-II Gene J. Biol. Chem., January 15, 1999; 274(3): 1216 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Pussinen, M. Jauhiainen, J. Metso, L. E. Pyle, Y. L. Marcel, N. H. Fidge, and C. Ehnholm Binding of phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) to apolipoproteins A-I and A-II: location of a PLTP binding domain in the amino terminal region of apoA-I J. Lipid Res., January 1, 1998; 39(1): 152 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
|