Articles |
From the Department of Cardiac Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, England (J.P.B., H.-I.Y., S.R., N.J.S.); Department of Cardiology, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London (N.S.P.); and Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand (C.R.G.).
Correspondence to Professor N.J. Severs, Department of Cardiac Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, England.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: gap junctions connexin43 smooth muscle cell atheroma coronary artery
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initiation and progression of the atherosclerotic plaque involves complex patterns of interaction between the cells of the arterial wall, in which growth factors and cytokines are known to play a critical role.1 2 3 4 6 7 Apart from such well-established extracellular signaling mechanisms, another form of interaction between cells involves direct intercellular communication via specialized interacting domains of the plasma membrane called gap junctions. Gap junctions consist of clusters of channels that bridge the apposing plasma membranes of neighboring cells, directly linking their cytoplasmic compartments.8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Each gap-junctional channel consists of a pair of connexons ("hemichannels"), one contributed by each of the junctional membranes, the connexon itself being constructed from six connexin monomers. The connexins are a multigene family of conserved proteins, different members of which are expressed in different cell types, tissues, and species.11 15 16
The channels formed by gap junctions permit direct cell-to-cell passage
of ions and small molecules (<
1 kD), thereby mediating
intercellular metabolic and electrical
coupling.8 9 10 12 13 14 17 Gap junctions are ubiquitous in
multicellular systems, and gap-junctional intercellular communication
has been implicated in a variety of biological functions, in particular
in the regulation of growth, proliferation, differentiation, and
development.18 19 20 21 22 Recent in vitro studies suggest that
direct intercellular interaction via gap junctions may modulate
cellular activities of significance in the pathogenesis of
atherosclerosis.23 24 For example,
coculture of smooth muscle cells with endothelial cells
leads to both increased growth factor production and enhanced
expression of messenger RNA encoding the gap-junctional protein
connexin43.23 25 26 The level of connexin43 mRNA in
cultured synthetic phenotype smooth muscle cells is
approximately six times greater than that expressed in smooth muscle
cells of the intact aorta,27 and expression of the protein
detectable by immunohistochemistry is high in the synthetic state but
becomes markedly reduced in the contractile state.28
Although these in vitro studies raise the possibility that gap-junctional communication may participate in the cellular interactions involved in atherogenesis, their precise significance has been difficult to assess because there has been no information to date on gap junction expression in the intact human arterial wall. The present study therefore set out to establish the pattern of smooth muscle connexin43 gap junction expression during human atherogenesis. To this end, we applied a specific antibody that we produced against connexin43,29 combined with the technique of confocal laser scanning microscopy, to provide high-definition imaging of gap junctions in human arterial lesions.30 Using samples of coronary arteries obtained from explanted hearts of transplant patients, we were able to collect lesions representing different stages of the disease and demonstrate that a distinctive spatial and temporal pattern of connexin43 expression between smooth muscle cells accompanies development of the atherosclerotic plaque.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tissue Processing
Samples for confocal microscopy were fixed for 2 to 4 hours in
Zamboni's solution, washed in buffer overnight, dehydrated via a
graded ethanol series, placed in chloroform overnight, and embedded in
wax by standard histological procedures. For electron
microscopy, fixation in glutaraldehyde was continued
for 2 hours. The specimens were then rinsed in buffer, postfixed in 2%
OsO4, en bloc stained in uranyl acetate, dehydrated
in ethanol, and embedded in epoxy resin by standard
procedures.32 Thin sections were stained with uranyl
acetate and lead citrate and examined in a Philips EM 301 electron
microscope.
Immunohistochemical Detection of Gap Junctions and Identification
of Cell Types
Antibodies
The primary polyclonal antiserum used for gap junction detection
was raised against a synthetic peptide (designated "HJ")
corresponding to residues 131 through 142 of the cytoplasmic loop of
the transmembrane gap-junctional protein molecule
connexin43.33 The peptide was cross-linked to the carrier
protein keyhole limpet hemocyanin with glutaraldehyde,
and polyclonal antisera were raised in Sandy half-lop
rabbits.29 34 Screening of the sera for reactivity was
done by dot blot assay, and specificity to the corresponding peptide
antigen was confirmed in dot blots. Specificity of the antiserum for
gap-junctional protein was demonstrated by Western blotting, and
specificity for ultrastructurally visualized gap junctions was shown by
preembedment immunogold labeling of isolated cardiac gap junctions and
by postembedment immunogold labeling of Lowicryl-embedded myocardial
tissue.29 30 35 A related antiserum (designated
"HH") that was raised against residues 101 through 112 of the
connexin43 molecule29 but that does not label gap
junctions in sections of wax-embedded material36 was used
as a control.
Two monoclonal antibodies (purchased from Dako) were used in
double-labeling experiments as specific cell-type markers: HAM56 for
the detection of macrophages and HHF35 (an anti
/
-actin
antibody) for the detection of smooth muscle
cells.25 26
The secondary antibody/detection systems used in the study were as follows: (1) swine anti-rabbit TRITC, (2) goat anti-mouse FITC (both from Dako), and (3) biotinylated sheep anti-rabbit immunoglobulin and Texas Redstreptavidin (Amersham Life Sciences).
Immunolabeling of Gap Junctions
Transverse sections (10 µm thick) of wax-embedded
arterial tissue were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in a
graded ethanol series. For standard labeling of gap junctions, the
sections were first incubated in a trypsin solution (containing 0.1%
trypsin [Sigma T-8128], 0.1% CaCl2, 20 mmol/L
Trizma base, pH 7.4) for 10 minutes at room temperature to reexpose
antigenic sites altered by fixation and processing.37
After washing in buffer and treatment for 40 minutes in PBS containing
0.1 mol/L L-lysine (blocking agent) and 0.1% Triton X-100
(which acts as a wetting agent and further aids antigen exposure), the
sections were incubated with the primary antiserum (dilution
1:10 in PBS) for 1 hour at 37°C. This was followed with a PBS
wash and treatment with swine anti-rabbit TRITC (1:20 dilution) for 1
hour in the dark at room temperature. After final washing in PBS, the
slides were mounted with Citifluor mounting medium (Citifluor Ltd).
Immunolabeled sections were examined by conventional
epifluorescence light microscopy and by confocal laser scanning
microscopy. As positive controls, longitudinal sections of 70-day-old
rat cardiac ventricle were included in each immunolabeling run. For
negative controls, the HH antiserum described above was used in place
of HJ.
Double Labeling of Gap Junctions With Specific Cell-Type
Markers
Double-labeling experiments to enable simultaneous
visualization of gap junctions with (1) smooth muscle cells and (2)
macrophages were carried out by a procedure modified from that
above. Sections were labeled sequentially with HJ antibody
(1:100) followed by either HHF35 (for smooth muscle cell
labeling) or HAM56 (for macrophage labeling) at a concentration
of 1:50 (1 hour, room temperature). A buffer wash was given between
and after the two antibody treatments. The sections were then exposed
to two secondary antibodies: biotinylated sheep anti-rabbit
immunoglobulin (1:250, 1 hour, room temperature; for the detection of
HJ-labeled gap junctions) and goat anti-mouse FITC (1:25, 40 minutes,
room temperature; for the detection of cell markers). Texas
Redstreptavidin (1:250) was used for fluorescent
visualization of the antibody-labeled gap junctions.
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and Semiquantitative
Analysis
Confocal microscopy was done with either a Bio-Rad Lasersharp
MRC-500 or a Leica TCS 4D fitted with the appropriate filter blocks
(for the detection of rhodamine, fluorescein, and Texas Red
fluorescence). Double-labeled preparations were imaged with the
latter instrument, equipped with an argon/krypton laser. The images
were taken by simultaneous dual-channel scanning. The major
part of the study (single labeling of gap junctions) was done with the
Bio-Rad, with the confocal aperture set to 45% to 50% of its full
adjustable range during image collection. Gain and contrast levels were
set according to procedures standardized to ensure that the image
collected demonstrated a full range of gray levels from black (0-pixel
intensity level) to peak white (255-pixel intensity level). All
sections were initially surveyed at low magnification with various
objectives so that the overall distribution of fluorescent
label could be assessed. Selected areas were subsequently examined at
higher magnification using a x60 objective (Nikon, NA 1.4) and the
zoom 1 setting on the computer (field size, 180x120 µm). Images were
routinely Kalman-averaged to reduce background noise levels. All
specimens were examined within 24 hours of immunolabeling.
The sizes of immunolabeled gap junctions were measured directly from the image data. Previous work has shown that immunofluorescent spot size measured under the specific conditions used correlates well with gap junction size determined by ultrastructural methods.38 For semiquantitative comparative analysis of the quantity of gap junctions, the specimens were classified into four groups (representing different stages of disease; see below). Within each group, multiple specimens, each providing 10 randomly selected optical sections, were analyzed. Gap junction area per unit area of these samples (µm2x10-5 per µm2 of section) was determined by use of PC IMAGE image analysis software (Foster Findlay Associates), after fluorescence judged to be nongap junctional in origin (eg, autofluorescence from elastic laminae) was edited out. The mean values (±SEM) were determined for each disease group and compared statistically by t test. It should be emphasized that the data obtained do not provide absolute values of gap-junctional content and are subject to a number of technical limitations. They may, however, be regarded as useful estimates of the relative quantities of gap junctions between groups for comparative purposes.
Correlative Histology and Classification of Lesions
Sections adjacent to those used for immunolabeling, stained with
hematoxylin and eosin, were examined by standard bright-field optics
for correlative histopathological assessment of each vessel and
classification of lesion types. Assessment and identification were
performed according to the criteria established by recognized
authorities.39 40 41 42 To simplify presentation of
the results, lesions were divided into four categories: (1) undiseased,
(2) intimal thickening, (3) early atheroma, and (4)
advanced atheroma. Group 2 includes the initial,
fatty-streak, and intermediate lesions of
atherosclerosis, as defined in a recent American Heart
Association Scientific Statement.42 43 The third and
fourth categories included all overt atherosclerotic lesions, including
those commonly described as atheroma, fibrolipid plaque,
and fibroatheroma, the distinction between these groups
being made on the basis of the degree of occlusion of the vessel (group
3, <30% occluded; group 4,
30% occluded). Complicated lesions all
fell within the fourth category. Specific types of lesion within the
categories are described in more detail when relevant to interpretation
and explanation of the findings. In groups 1 through 3, two zones are
recognized within the intima: the proteoglycan layer on the
endothelial side and the deeper musculoelastic
layer.44
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Figs 2 through 4![]()
![]()
illustrate representative details of confocal
immunolabeling results from three advanced lesions (category 4), set
within the context of their overall histological
appearance. Lesions in this category share a number of common features
(marked luminal narrowing, extensive fibrous material, and variable
amounts of lipid deposition) but show considerable variation in
detailed histological morphology. They may, for
example, comprise eccentric, solid fibrous plaques with finely
dispersed lipid and crystalline cholesterol (Fig 2A
),
show extensive thrombus and almost totally occlude the vessel (Fig 3A
),
or appear as less obstructive fibrous plaques (Fig 4A
). Confocal
microscopy revealed positive immunolabeling of gap junctions as
distinct fluorescent spots in all such lesions. Fig 2B
illustrates a typical example, taken from the superficial intimal
region indicated in the corresponding histological
section in Fig 2A
. Most of the samples revealed autofluorescent
material that was distinguished from specific immunofluorescent
label by alternating rhodamine and fluorescein filter
blocks on the Nikon epifluorescence microscope. Specific label
was seen only at the rhodamine wavelength, whereas the
autofluorescent material had broader excitation and/or emission
wavelengths and could be detected by use of either filter block.
|
All advanced lesions showed a patchy distribution of moderately large
(1 to 2 µm) immunolabeled gap junctions. The mean quantity of
gap-junctional fluorescent spots measured in the advanced
lesions was 6.2x10-5
µm2/µm2 section area (±1.6 SEM;
n=60). Some variation in the extent of the gap junction labeling was
apparent, according to specific features of the lesion. Specifically,
there was an inverse correlation between the degree of fibrous
deposition and the extent of gap junction immunolabeling, which may be
seen by comparison of Figs 2 through 4![]()
![]()
. In the most advanced stages of
fibroatheroma (such as that illustrated in Figs 2
and 3
),
immunolabeling was observed in the fibrous cap as small, sparsely
scattered fluorescent spots (Fig 2B
). In the deeper zones of
the intima bordering the media (Fig 3B
), the immunolabeled junctions
were clustered to form discrete but relatively infrequently observed
patches of label. In less occlusive lesions (Fig 4
), immunolabeled gap
junctions were more abundant. In such lesions, a distinct difference
was apparent between the superficial fibrous region, which contained
isolated foci of gap junctions (Fig 4B
), and adjacent deeper zones of
the lesion (Fig 4C
), in which the foci were more numerous. This trend
was apparent in six separate advanced atheromatous
lesions examined.
In earlier atheromatous lesions (category 3), the
connexin43 gap junction levels were markedly higher than in advanced
atheroma, with a surface density of 36.9x10-5
µm2/µm2 section (±4.6 SEM). Fig 5
shows an example of such a lesion, together with a
surrounding zone of intimal thickening. In regions of intimal
thickening (category 2), the quantities of gap junctions were higher
still at 152.3x10-5
µm2/µm2 (±19.1 SEM), a value
approximately fourfold that of early atheroma. These
features are illustrated in panels B through D of Fig 5
. In diffusely
thickened intimal regions, which contain multiple deposits of lipid,
punctate gap-junctional labeling can be seen profusely distributed
throughout the entire circumference of the thickened intima to the
border of the small fibrolipid plaque (Fig 5B
and 5C
). By contrast,
fewer gap junctions are apparent at the site of the plaque (Fig 5D
).
Although the size of the largest immunolabeled gap junctions in these
lesions was similar to those in the advanced lesion category, small
junctions (<1 µm) were markedly more abundant, particularly in the
regions of intimal thickening.
|
For comparison, an example of a confocal image of gap-junctional
labeling in the normal arterial wall is illustrated in Fig 6
. Sections of undiseased arteries showed significantly
lower levels (P<.001) of labeling than those found in
intimal thickening and early atheroma, with a value of
12.9x10-5 µm2 (±2.5 SEM) immunolabeled
junctions per µm2 section. The fluorescent spots
were typically small and had a uniformly scattered distribution. By
contrast, comparison of the quantity of gap-junctional labeling in
undiseased vessels with that in advanced lesions revealed the latter to
be significantly lower (P=.03).
That the immunolabeling observed throughout was specific was demonstrated by use of positive and negative controls. The heart sections stained in parallel always showed clear immunolabeling in the distinctive pattern of intercalated disks. No immunolabeling was observed (1) when the primary antibody was omitted and (2) when HH antibody was used in place of HJ.
In all samples, occasional labeling of the endothelium,
identified by the position of the label in cells immediately adjacent
to the lumen, was apparent. To establish which cell type within the
arterial wall expresses the connexin43 gap junctions
detected, double-labeling experiments were conducted to visualize gap
junctions in combination with histochemically identified smooth muscle
cells and macrophages. As demonstrated by the examples in Fig 7![]()
, gap-junctional immunolabeling was
clearly associated with smooth muscle cells rather than with
macrophages. The colocalization of gap junctions with smooth
muscle cells is apparent when the two fluorescent images are
presented in superimposed form (Fig 7B![]()
), although, owing to the
relatively stronger fluorescence of the cell type marker
compared with the small gap junction spots, some masking of the latter
occurs. Clearer views are obtained when the gap junction labeling and
histochemically identified smooth muscle cells in an identical area are
presented as separate, side-by-side images (Fig 7C![]()
).
Corresponding double-label experiments in which macrophages and
gap junctions were localized revealed that macrophage-rich
zones were not associated with gap junction label (Fig 7D![]()
), whereas
zones containing fewer macrophages revealed some gap-junctional
labeling predominantly in immunonegative regions between the
marked cells (Fig 7E![]()
).
|
|
Further evidence that the gap junctions detected by immunolabeling were
specifically associated with smooth muscle cells was obtained by
thin-section electron microscopy (Fig 8
). Gap junctions
were seldom detected in advanced atherosclerotic lesions examined by
thin sectioning, in line with their relative scarcity apparent by
immunoconfocal microscopy. In earlier lesions, however, patches of
small gap junctions were detected between groups of smooth muscle
cells. The junctions were typically observed at points of interaction
formed by finger-like processes extruded across regions of
extracellular matrix (Fig 8A
and 8B
). No gap junctions were observed
between macrophages.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interactions between cells, particularly those involving extracellular signaling, play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.3 6 Direct intercellular communication via gap junctions has been implicated in the control of growth and differentiation in many systems,18 19 20 21 22 and these junctions have recently attracted attention in in vitro studies as possible modulators of function in the pathogenesis of arterial disease.23 24 Although the presence of gap junctions between neointimal smooth muscle cells has been noted in animal models of atherogenesis,45 46 the restricted sampling inherent in electron microscopy has prevented their detailed investigation, and no information has been available concerning the possible role of gap junctions in human arterial disease. By applying confocal microscopy, we obtained extensive high-definition views of immunofluorescently labeled gap junctions through the depths of 10-µm-thick tissue sections across human lesions. The relatively large volumes of tissue sampled by this technique reveal the overall amounts and patterns of connexin43 gap junction distribution and how these patterns change during lesion growth. Confocal immunodetection of gap junctions reveals the heterogeneity of junction distribution, a feature that would be difficult to detect with the restricted sampling attainable by thin-section electron microscopy.
The major gap-junctional protein expressed by smooth muscle cells is connexin43,27 47 48 49 50 and the antiserum used in the present study, directed against this connexin isoform, has previously been shown to bind specifically to smooth muscle cell gap junctions both in cultured cells28 and in cells of the intact arterial wall.51 Expression of mRNA for an additional connexin isoform, connexin40, has been reported in cultured smooth muscle cells,52 and although this connexin has been localized in smooth muscle cells of small resistance vessels,53 it does not appear to be present in significant quantities in the intact arterial wall.49 54 In contrast to smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells express connexin40 in both arterioles and large arteries.49 53 Endothelial cells also express connexin3755 and, as confirmed here, connexin43.56 In the present study, however, we observed only minor immunolabeling of connexin43 gap junctions between endothelial cells, any such immunolabeling attributable to this cell type being readily identifiable by its location at the luminal interface.
It has recently been reported that ATP-sensitive plasma membrane channels in macrophages consist of a protein that is homologous to connexin4357 and that macrophage foam cells in the atherosclerotic plaque express connexin43 messenger RNA.24 If the gap junction immunolabeling results were taken alone, it might be supposed that some of the observed signal was due to connexin43 expression by macrophages or macrophage/foam cells. This possibility was excluded by the negative correlation between gap junction immunolocalization and macrophages shown in our double labeling results. If ATP-sensitive membrane channels, homologous to connexons, were abundantly present and recognized by our HJ antibody, a diffuse signal might be predicted, reflecting a protein dispersed in the plasma membrane. However, no evidence for such a signal was apparent. Morphologically defined gap junctions involving macrophages or macrophage/foam cells were not observed by electron microscopy of the intact tissue. The significance of the reported expression of connexin43 transcripts in macrophages thus remains to be further evaluated.
That the observed connexin43 immunolabeling was confined to and representative of gap junction expression specifically by smooth muscle cells was demonstrated by (1) the double-labeling experiments (gap junction immunolabeling plus smooth muscle cell markers) and (2) the correlation found between the quantity of connexin43 immunolabeling detectable by confocal microscopy and the frequency of detection of ultrastructurally defined gap junctions between smooth muscle cells visible by electron microscopy at the different stages of lesion development.
We recently reported that expression of connexin43 gap junctions in cultured smooth muscle cells correlates with phenotype.28 Transition from the contractile to the synthetic phenotype is accompanied by pronounced formation of connexin43 gap junctions in vitro. The markedly enhanced expression of connexin43 gap junctions observed in early lesions in the present study demonstrates that this correlation between the synthetic state and enhanced gap junction expression also applies in vivo. Smooth muscle cells are a normal component of the undiseased intimal wall of human coronary artery,44 some of these cells being of the contractile phenotype and some synthetic. In early lesions, the cells that express gap junctions abundantly may in theory be derived either from preexisting intimal smooth muscle cells that have undergone transition from the contractile to the synthetic state or from cells that have migrated from the media.
Enhanced gap junction expression between smooth muscle cells thus appears early in the pathogenetic sequence, coincident with the initial accumulation of lipid and the onset of synthesis and accumulation of extracellular matrix components that account for the bulk growth of the lesion. Why and how the smooth muscle cells form gap junctions in such abundance at this stage is unclear, but it may be hypothesized that the complex actions of growth factors and cytokines involved in initiation of atherogenesis may act to enhance gap-junctional expression. For example, a close association between basic fibroblast growth factor and gap junctions has been reported in a number of systems.58 59 60 LDL (and specifically the apolipoprotein B moiety) has been shown to be a powerful stimulator of gap junction formation in cultured hepatoma cells,61 so the possibility exists that lipid accumulation at the earliest stages of atherogenesis itself serves as a direct stimulus to this initial phase of gap junction formation in smooth muscle cells of the arterial wall.
How might smooth muscle cell gap junctions contribute to progression of the atherosclerotic lesion? Smooth muscle cells in vitro have been shown, after several consecutive doublings, to adopt an irreversible synthetic phenotype,62 and direct communication between the cytoplasmic compartments of synthetic smooth muscle cells may contribute to the maintenance of this phenotype in the earlier stages of the disease. Gap-junctional communication would, in theory, permit passage of small regulatory molecules and ions between cells, either of which may influence phenotypic expression. Although the identity of such putative regulatory molecules is unknown, our results are consistent with a role for gap junctions in sustaining the activities of smooth muscle cells that result in growth of the plaque.
The subsequent decline in gap junction quantity with advancing stages of the disease parallels accumulation of extracellular matrix material. Gap junctions gradually become fewer, larger, and more sparsely scattered during this process. These changes may be explained in part by the increased separation between the cells brought about as they deposit matrix material around themselves. This increased separation appears to progressively reduce the areas over which adjacent plasma membranes can closely interact. Instead of multiple points of interaction over the cell surface, fewer sites of interaction are found, formed by long processes stretching across accumulating matrix. These circumstances dictate the presence of fewer junctions, and the observed increase in junction size may in part compensate for the enforced reduction in junction number. Ultimately, however, the quantity of extracellular matrix increases to the extent that, apart from isolated patches of smooth muscle cells, most of the cells in the lesion are unable to maintain any gap-junctional contact with their neighbors. By this time, however, the lesion is so advanced that gap-junctional communication is probably of little further significance to the genesis of the lesion or its fate.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 28, 1995; accepted May 2, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Wissler RW. Theories and new horizons in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and the mechanisms of clinical effects. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:1281-1291. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801-809. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: current understanding of mechanisms and future strategies in therapy. Transplant Proc. 1993;25:2041-2043.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Campbell GR, Campbell JH, Manderson JA, Horrigan S, Rennick RE. Arterial smooth muscle: a multifunctional mesenchymal cell. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988;112:977-986. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Robenek H, Severs NJ. Cell Interactions in Atherosclerosis. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1992:1-318.
7. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: a defense mechanism gone awry. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:987-1002. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. De Mello WC. Cell Intercommunication. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1990:1-290.
9. Dermietzel R, Hwang TK, Spray DS. The gap junction family: structure, function and chemistry. Anat Embryol. 1990;182:517-528. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Bennett MVL, Barrio LC, Bargiello TA, Spray DC, Hertzberg E, Sáez JC. Gap junctions: new tools, new answers, new questions. Neuron. 1991;6:305-320. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Willecke K, Hennemann H, Dahl E, Jungbluth S, Heynkes R. The diversity of connexin genes encoding gap-junctional proteins. Eur J Cell Biol. 1991;56:1-7. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Peracchia C. Biophysics of Gap Junction Channels. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1991:1-384.
13. Hall JE, Zampighi GA, Davis RM. Progress in Cell Research, Vol 3: Gap Junctions. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1993:1-356.
14. Beyer EC. Gap junctions. Int Rev Cytol. 1993;137C:1-37.
15. Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. Connexin family of gap junction proteins. J Membr Biol. 1990;116:187-194. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Kumar NM. Gap junctions: a multigene family. Adv Struct Biol. 1992;1:209-249.
17. Page E. Cardiac gap junctions. In: Fozzard HA, Haber E, Jennings RB, Katz AM, Morgan HE, eds. The Heart and Cardiovascular System. New York, NY: Raven Press Ltd; 1992:1003-1048.
18. Loewenstein WR. Junctional intercellular communication and the control of growth. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979;560:1-65. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Mehta P, Bertram J, Loewenstein WR. Growth inhibition of transformed cells correlates with junctional communication with normal cells. Cell. 1986;44:187-196. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Fraser SE, Green CR, Bode HR, Gilula NB.
Selective disruption of gap junctional communication interferes
with a patterning process in Hydra. Science. 1987;237:49-55.
21. Warner AE, Guthrie SC, Gilula NB. Antibodies to gap-junctional protein selectively disrupt junctional communication in early embryos. Nature. 1984;322:127-131.
22. Loewenstein WR, Rose B. The cell-cell channel in the control of growth. Semin Cell Biol. 1992;3:59-79. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Navab M, Ross LA, Hama S, Liao F, Hough GP, Drinkwater DC, Laks H, Fogelman AM. Interactions of human aortic wall cells in co-culture. Atheroscler Rev. 1991;23:153-160.
24. Polacek D, Lal R, Volin MV, Davies PF. Gap junctional communication between vascular cells: induction of connexin43 messenger RNA in macrophage foam cells of atherosclerotic lesions. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:593-606. [Abstract]
25. Katsuda S, Boyd HC, Fligner C, Ross R, Gown AM. Human atherosclerosis, III: immunocytochemical analysis of the cell composition of lesions of young adults. Am J Pathol. 1992;140:907-914. [Abstract]
26. Katsuda S, Coltrera MD, Ross R, Gown AM. Human atherosclerosis, IV: immunocytochemical analysis of cell activation and proliferation in lesions of young adults. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1787-1793. [Abstract]
27.
Lash JA, Critser ES, Pressler ML. Cloning of a
gap junctional protein from vascular smooth muscle and expression in
two-cell mouse embryos. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:13113-13117.
28. Rennick RE, Connat J-L, Burnstock G, Rothery S, Severs NJ, Green CR. Expression of connexin43 gap junctions between cultured vascular smooth muscle cells is dependent upon phenotype. Cell Tissue Res. 1993;271:323-332. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Harfst E, Severs NJ, Green CR. Cardiac myocyte
gap junctions: evidence for a major connexon protein with an apparent
relative molecular mass of 70,000. J Cell
Sci. 1990;96:591-604.
30.
Gourdie RG, Green CR, Severs NJ. Gap junction
distribution in adult mammalian myocardium revealed by an
antipeptide antibody and laser scanning confocal microscopy.
J Cell Sci. 1991;99:41-55.
31. Toshimori H, Toshimori K, Oura C, Matsuo H. Immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry of natriuretic polypeptide in porcine heart. Histochemistry. 1987;86:595-601. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Severs NJ, Slade AM, Powell T, Twist VW, Jones GE. Morphometric analysis of the isolated calcium-tolerant cardiac myocyte: organelle volumes, sarcomere length, plasma membrane surface folds and intramembrane particle density and distribution. Cell Tissue Res. 1985;240:159-168. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. Connexin43: a
protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from
liver. J Cell Biol. 1987;105:2621-2629.
34. Green CR, Severs NJ. Distribution and role of gap junctions in normal myocardium and human ischaemic heart disease. Histochemistry. 1993;99:105-120. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Severs NJ, Gourdie RG, Harfst E, Peters NS, Green CR. Intercellular junctions and the application of microscopical techniques: the cardiac gap junction as a case model. J Microsc. 1993;169:299-328. Review. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Gourdie RG, Harfst E, Severs NJ, Green CR. Cardiac gap junctions in rat ventricle: localization using site-directed antibodies and laser scanning confocal microscopy. Cardioscience. 1990;1:75-82. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Harlow E, Lane D. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press; 1988:1-726.
38. Green CR, Peters NS, Gourdie RG, Rothery S, Severs NJ. Validation of immunohistochemical quantification in confocal scanning laser microscopy: a comparative assessment of gap junction size with confocal and ultrastructural techniques. J Histochem Cytochem. 1993;41:1339-1349. [Abstract]
39. World Health Organization. Classification of atherosclerotic lesions: report of a study group. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 1958;143:1-20.
40. Guzmán MA, McMahan CA, McGill HC Jr, Strong JP, Tejada C, Restrepo C, Eggan DA, Robertson WB, Solberg LA. Selected methodologic aspects of the international atherosclerosis project. Lab Invest. 1968;18:479-497. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Stary H. Evolutional progression of atherosclerotic lesions in coronary arteries of children and young adults. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9(suppl 1):19-32.
42.
Stary HC, Bleakley Chandler A, Glagov S, Guyton JR,
Insull W Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schaffer SA, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler
RW. A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate
lesions of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee
on Vascular Lesions of the Council on
Arteriosclerosis, American Heart
Association. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:840-856.
43.
Stary HC, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Guyton JR, Insull W
Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schaffer SA, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW.
A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions
of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on
Vascular Lesions of the Council on
Arteriosclerosis, American Heart
Association. Circulation. 1994;89:2462-2478.
44.
Stary HC, Blankenhorn DH, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Insull
W Jr, Richardson M, Rosenfeld ME, Schaffer SA, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD,
Wissler RW. Special report: a definition of the intima of human
arteries and of its atherosclerosis-prone regions: a
report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on
Arteriosclerosis, American Heart
Association. Circulation. 1992;85:391-405.
45. Kocher O, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G, Reidy MA, Cokay MS, Peters H, Hüttner I. Phenotypic features of smooth muscle cells during the evolution of experimental carotid artery intimal thickening: biochemical and morphologic studies. Lab Invest. 1991;65:459-470. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Vankova M, Grünwald J. Gap junctional vesicles in the neointimal smooth muscle cells of balloon injured carotid artery. Exp Pathol. 1991;42:101-105. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Larson DM, Haudenschild CC, Beyer EC. Gap
junction messenger RNA expression by vascular wall cells.
Circ Res. 1990;66:1074-1080.
48. Moore LK, Beyer EC, Burt JM. Characterization of gap junction channels in A7r5 vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(Cell Physiol):C975-C981.
49. Bruzzone R, Haefliger J-A, Gimlich RL, Paul DL. Connexin40, a component of gap junctions in vascular endothelium, is restricted in its ability to interact with other connexins. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:7-19. [Abstract]
50.
Christ GJ, Brink PR, Zhao W, Moss J, Gondré CM,
Roy C, Spray DC. Gap junctions modulate tissue
contractility and alpha1
adrenergic agonist efficacy in isolated rat aorta.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;266:1054-1065.
51.
Bény J-L, Connat J-L. An
electron-microscopic study of smooth muscle cell dye coupling in the
pig coronary arteries: role of gap junctions.
Circ Res. 1992;70:49-55.
52. Beyer EC, Reed KE, Westphale EM, Kanter HL, Larson DM. Molecular cloning and expression of rat connexin40, a gap junction protein expressed in vascular smooth muscle. J Membr Biol. 1992;127:69-76. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Little TL, Beyer EC, Duling BR. Connexin 43 and connexin 40 gap junctional proteins are present in arteriolar smooth muscle and endothelium in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(Heart Circ Physiol):H729-H739.
54.
Bastide B, Neyses L, Ganten D, Paul M, Willecke K,
Traub O. Gap junction protein connexin40 is preferentially
expressed in vascular endothelium and conductive
bundles of rat myocardium and is increased under
hypertensive conditions. Circ Res. 1993;73:1138-1149.
55. Reed KE, Westphale EM, Larson DM, Wang H-Z, Veenstra RD, Beyer EC. Molecular cloning and functional expression of human connexin37, an endothelial cell gap junction protein. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:997-1004.
56. Pepper MS, Montesano R, El Aoumari A, Gros D, Orci L, Meda P. Coupling and connexin 43 expression in microvascular and large vessel endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1992;262(Cell Physiol):C1246-C1257.
57.
Beyer EC, Steinberg TH. Evidence that the gap
junction protein connexin-43 is the ATP-induced pore of mouse
macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:7971-7974.
58. Yamamoto T, Kardami E, Nagy JI. Basic fibroblast growth factor in rat brain: localization to glial gap junctions correlates with connexin43 distribution. Brain Res. 1991;554:336-343. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59.
Kardami E, Stoski RM, Doble BW, Yamamoto T, Hertzberg
EL, Nagy JI. Biochemical and ultrastructural evidence for the
association of basic fibroblast growth factor with cardiac gap
junctions. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:19551-19557.
60. Doble BW, Kardami E. Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates connexin-43 expression and intercellular communication of cardiac fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biochem. 1995;143:81-87. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Meyer RA, Lampe PD, Malewicz B, Baumann WJ, Johnson RG. Enhanced gap junction formation with LDL and apolipoprotein B. Exp Cell Res. 1991;196:72-81. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Campbell GR, Campbell JH. Recent advances in molecular pathology: smooth muscle phenotypic changes in arterial wall homeostasis: implications for the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Exp Mol Pathol. 1985;42:139-162.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Burnier, P. Fontana, A. Angelillo-Scherrer, and B. R. Kwak Intercellular Communication in Atherosclerosis Physiology, February 1, 2009; 24(1): 36 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C Villar, A. J Hobbs, and A. Ahluwalia Sex differences in vascular function: implication of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 197(3): 447 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Chadjichristos, S. Morel, J.-P. Derouette, E. Sutter, I. Roth, A. C. Brisset, M.-L. Bochaton-Piallat, and B. R. Kwak Targeting Connexin 43 Prevents Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB-Induced Phenotypic Change in Porcine Coronary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells Circ. Res., March 28, 2008; 102(6): 653 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liao, C. P. Regan, I. Manabe, G. K. Owens, K. H. Day, D. N. Damon, and B. R. Duling Smooth Muscle-Targeted Knockout of Connexin43 Enhances Neointimal Formation in Response to Vascular Injury Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, May 1, 2007; 27(5): 1037 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Chadjichristos, C. M. Matter, I. Roth, E. Sutter, G. Pelli, T. F. Luscher, M. Chanson, and B. R. Kwak Reduced Connexin43 Expression Limits Neointima Formation After Balloon Distension Injury in Hypercholesterolemic Mice Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): 2835 - 2843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Isakson, D. N. Damon, K. H. Day, Y. Liao, and B. R. Duling Connexin40 and connexin43 in mouse aortic endothelium: evidence for coordinated regulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): H1199 - H1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W Wong, T. Christen, and B. R Kwak Connexins in leukocytes: shuttling messages? Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 357 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E.M. Martin and W.H. Evans Incorporation of connexins into plasma membranes and gap junctions Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 378 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. SAEZ, V. M. BERTHOUD, M. C. BRANES, A. D. MARTINEZ, and E. C. BEYER Plasma Membrane Channels Formed by Connexins: Their Regulation and Functions Physiol Rev, October 1, 2003; 83(4): 1359 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-I Yeh, C.-S. Lu, Y.-J. Wu, C.-C. Chen, R.-C. Hong, Y.-S. Ko, M.-S. Shiao, N. J. Severs, and C.-H. Tsai Reduced Expression of Endothelial Connexin37 and Connexin40 in Hyperlipidemic Mice: Recovery of Connexin37 After 7-Day Simvastatin Treatment Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, August 1, 2003; 23(8): 1391 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Kwak, N. Veillard, G. Pelli, F. Mulhaupt, R. W. James, M. Chanson, and F. Mach Reduced Connexin43 Expression Inhibits Atherosclerotic Lesion Formation in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Deficient Mice Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 1033 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Kwak, F. Mulhaupt, N. Veillard, D. B. Gros, and F. Mach Altered Pattern of Vascular Connexin Expression in Atherosclerotic Plaques Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2002; 22(2): 225 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-I Yeh, Y.-J. Lai, S.-H. Lee, Y.-N. Lee, Y.-S. Ko, S.-A. Chen, N. J. Severs, and C.-H. Tsai Heterogeneity of Myocardial Sleeve Morphology and Gap Junctions in Canine Superior Vena Cava Circulation, December 18, 2001; 104(25): 3152 - 3157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Kwak, M. S. Pepper, D. B. Gros, and P. Meda Inhibition of Endothelial Wound Repair by Dominant Negative Connexin Inhibitors Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2001; 12(4): 831 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-S. Ko, S. R. Coppen, E. Dupont, S. Rothery, and N. J. Severs Regional Differentiation of Desmin, Connexin43, and Connexin45 Expression Patterns in Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2001; 21(3): 355 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Burt, A. M. Fletcher, T. D. Steele, Y. Wu, G. T. Cottrell, and D. T. Kurjiaka Alteration of Cx43:Cx40 expression ratio in A7r5 cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): C500 - C508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-I Yeh, H.-M. Chang, W.-W. Lu, Y.-N. Lee, Y.-S. Ko, N. J. Severs, and C.-H. Tsai Age-related Alteration of Gap Junction Distribution and Connexin Expression in Rat Aortic Endothelium J. Histochem. Cytochem., October 1, 2000; 48(10): 1377 - 1390. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.-I Yeh, Y.-J. Lai, H.-M. Chang, Y.-S. Ko, N. J. Severs, and C.-H. Tsai Multiple Connexin Expression in Regenerating Arterial Endothelial Gap Junctions Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2000; 20(7): 1753 - 1762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-A. Haefliger, P. Meda, A. Formenton, P. Wiesel, A. Zanchi, H. R. Brunner, P. Nicod, and D. Hayoz Aortic Connexin43 Is Decreased During Hypertension Induced by Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Synthase Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 1999; 19(7): 1615 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-S. Ko, H.-I Yeh, M. Haw, E. Dupont, R. Kaba, G. Plenz, H. Robenek, and N. J. Severs Differential Expression of Connexin43 and Desmin Defines Two Subpopulations of Medial Smooth Muscle Cells in the Human Internal Mammary Artery Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 1999; 19(7): 1669 - 1680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. He, J. X. Jiang, S. M. Taffet, and J. M. Burt Formation of heteromeric gap junction channels by connexins 40 and 43 in vascular smooth muscle cells PNAS, May 25, 1999; 96(11): 6495 - 6500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Kurjiaka, T. D. Steele, M. V. Olsen, and J. M. Burt Gap junction permeability is diminished in proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 1998; 275(6): C1674 - C1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-I Yeh, F. Lupu, E. Dupont, and N. J. Severs Upregulation of Connexin43 Gap Junctions Between Smooth Muscle Cells After Balloon Catheter Injury in the Rat Carotid Artery Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 1997; 17(11): 3174 - 3184. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.-I Yeh, E. Dupont, S. Coppen, S. Rothery, and N. J. Severs Gap Junction Localization and Connexin Expression in Cytochemically Identified Endothelial Cells of Arterial Tissue J. Histochem. Cytochem., January 1, 1997; 45(4): 539 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Li, S. Brodsky, S. Kumari, V. Valiunas, P. Brink, J.-I. Kaide, A. Nasjletti, and M. S. Goligorsky Paradoxical overexpression and translocation of connexin43 in homocysteine-treated endothelial cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2124 - H2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |