Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:1166-1171

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fyfe, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gotlieb, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fyfe, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gotlieb, A. I.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*AZATHIOPRINE
*CYCLOSPORIN A
*METHYLPREDNISOLONE
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:1166-1171.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Immunosuppressive Agents and Endothelial Repair

Prednisolone Delays Migration and Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in Wounded Porcine Aortic Monolayers

Presented in part at the Xth Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology, Dallas, Tex, March 6-9, 1992, and published in abstract form in J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:121A.

Alistair I. Fyfe; Alan Rosenthal; Avrum I. Gotlieb

From the Vascular Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology, and The Banting and Best Diabetes Center, University of Toronto, and The Toronto Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.R., A.I.G.), and the UCLA Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles, Calif (A.I.F.).

Correspondence to Alistair I. Fyfe, UCLA Division of Cardiology, 47-123 CHS, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1679. E-mail afyfe@medicine.medsch.ucla.edu.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract Endothelial denudation at areas of predilection to atherosclerosis is balanced by an active repair process that may be inhibited under conditions of accelerated atherosclerosis. After cardiac transplantation, the accelerated atherosclerotic process that develops may be enhanced by immunosuppressive agents that have nonspecific effects on cell signaling, proliferation, and response to injury. To study subtle effects of cyclosporine A, azathioprine, and 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone on normal endothelial repair processes, confluent porcine endothelial monolayers were denuded in the presence of clinically relevant concentrations of these agents. The rate of endothelial wound repair was compared and the effects on cell spreading, proliferation, and the cytoskeleton assessed. 6{alpha}-Methylprednisolone at concentrations of 1.25 to 50 µmol/L was associated with a transient 30% to 60% inhibition of endothelial wound repair. This was associated with increased cell size at the wound edge and a delay in centrosomal reorientation toward the wound, without any effect on cell proliferation. Cyclosporine and azathioprine in clinically relevant concentrations did not affect endothelial repair. Thus, corticosteroids transiently inhibit endothelial cytoskeletal alterations that are important in endothelial repair after a denuding injury.


Key Words: cyclosporine A • wound repair • azathioprine • endothelium • corticosteroids


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A central feature of atherosclerosis is the presence of a functional or structural endothelial "injury,"1 and the rate of development of atherosclerosis has been linked to the amount of endothelial injury.2 Transplant coronary disease after cardiac transplantation is the most frequent cause of death after the first year of survival.3 The diffuse nature of the disease, which is confined to the grafted aorta and coronary arteries, suggests an immunologic mechanism for endothelial injury. Prognostic factors for the development of graft atherosclerosis include repeated episodes of tissue rejection, cytomegalovirus infection,4 hypercholesterolemia,5 ischemia/reperfusion, and cardioplegia, any or all of which may contribute to endothelial injury.6 Evidence for endothelial injury in humans is derived from studies of endothelial function, which is abnormal after cardiac transplantation,7 and from observations of endothelial denudation in animal models of cardiac transplantation.8 Endothelial turnover is known to be increased in areas of predilection for atherosclerosis,9 and the loss of endothelial integrity may contribute to the migration and trapping of lipoproteins10 and monocytes11 in the subendothelial space. It follows that the ability of the endothelium to repair denuded areas may be important in the prevention of atherosclerosis in general and in the development of transplant coronary disease in particular.

Immunosuppressive agents have metabolic and cytotoxic side effects that may contribute to atherosclerosis, independent of their effects on the immune system. CsA binds to the cytoplasmic protein cyclophilin and acts through a calmodulin-dependent serine-threonine phosphatase to prevent phosphorylation of the inhibitor of nuclear factor–{kappa}B (I-{kappa}B), a ubiquitous cytoplasmic nuclear transcription factor.12 The immunosuppressive effect of CsA is a result of transcriptional inhibition of interleukin-2 production.12 CsA has been shown to inhibit EC13 and smooth muscle cell14 proliferation in vitro but is paradoxically associated with an increase in atherosclerosis in mice.15 Azathioprine and its active metabolite 6-mercaptopurine are competitive inhibitors of purine metabolism and have preferential effects on proliferating cells. The major effect of glucocorticoids in inflammation and immunity is to prevent the expression of proinflammatory16 and cytokine17 genes. Whereas glucocorticoids have been shown to increase the size of ECs in vitro,18 recent clinical evidence suggests that corticosteroid use is associated with an increase in fatal cardiovascular events.19

This study was undertaken to assess the effects of currently used immunosuppressive drugs (CsA, azathioprine, and 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone) on endothelial repair by using a well-characterized porcine endothelium monolayer wound model.20 The effects of these agents on cell size, shape, proliferation, and cytoskeleton were also studied. We can show that methylprednisolone transiently inhibits repair, actin filament resorption, and centrosomal movement in response to injury.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Drug Preparations
The metabolically active derivative of prednisone, 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone (Sigma Chemical Co), was dissolved in 95% (vol/vol) ethanol to 1 mg/mL. Various dilutions from 1.25 to 50 µmol/L were added directly to the culture medium before use. Control monolayers were treated with similar concentrations of ethanol. CsA (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals) was dissolved in absolute ethanol and Tween 80 (20 µL/mL) at 10 mg/mL. Dilutions of 100 to 3200 ng/mL were made in standard culture medium at the time of use. Controls were treated with ethanol and Tween 80 at similar dilutions. CsA concentrations were measured in the culture media by high-performance liquid chromatography to confirm the final concentrations. Azathioprine and its active metabolite 6-mercaptopurine (Sigma) were dissolved in 1 mol/L NH4OH (to yield a concentration of 10 mg/mL) and diluted in M199 (Whittaker) to yield a concentration of 100 µg/mL. Dilutions of 25 to 100 ng/mL were made directly into the culture medium. Controls were treated with NH4OH at identical concentrations.

EC Cultures
Porcine ECs were harvested as previously described.21 In brief, porcine aortas were collected in PBS supplemented with antibiotics, and ECs were harvested by collagenase dispersion. Monolayers were incubated at 37°C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Confluent primary cultures were passaged by trypsin-EDTA dispersion. Cells from the fourth and eighth passages were used.

Monolayers were established by plating 1x104 cells on 22x22-mm coverslips in 35-mm tissue-culture dishes. After allowing the cells to adhere to the dishes for 24 hours, the cultures were exposed to single drugs or drug combinations with appropriate controls. Confluent monolayers were wounded by using a spatula, and three scratches, perpendicular to the wound, were made with a diamond pencil.17 The monolayers were washed twice with PBS, and medium containing the same drug combination as before wounding was added. The size of the wound was measured by phase-contrast microscopy and a x10 graduated eyepiece at 0, 24, and 48 hours at sites opposite the perpendicular scratches. Migration of the wound edge was assessed by subtracting wound size at 24 or 48 hours from baseline (0 hour). Each treatment group consisted of three sets of experiments, each with three coverslips and each with triplicate measurements (total of 27). Endothelial wound repair was expressed as mean±SD of the distance covered by the advancing wound edges in 24 hours. Comparisons among groups were made by ANOVA.

Cytoskeletal Studies
To characterize the effects of the drugs on the distribution of actin microfilaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments in the cells, monolayers were washed at 24 hours in PBS, fixed with 3% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, and stained with fluorescence-labeled antibodies to vimentin and tubulin as previously described.10 F-actin was stained with rhodamine-phalloidin.10 Slides were examined by fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss) and photographed on Kodak Tri-X pan film. Tubulin-stained cells were examined for centrosome position and scored as being toward the wound edge, away from the wound edge, or in the middle, as previously described.17 19 Differences in orientation were compared by Fisher's Exact Test.

To measure the size of single cells at the wound edge, photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin–stained monolayers were analyzed quantitatively using Apple computer software and a graphics tablet. The cell size was calculated for 20 cells from control cultures and 20 cells from 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone (20 µmol/L)–treated cultures. Differences in cell size were compared by Student's t test.

Cell Proliferation Studies
The effect of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone (2.5 and 20 µmol/L) on EC proliferation was assessed by BrdU incorporation into cellular DNA 24 hours after wounding. Cultures were incubated for 1.5 hours with a BrdU labeling reagent (Amersham) at 37°C. After a brief wash in PBS the cultures were treated with acetone at 4°C for 10 minutes and then fixed with ethanol/acetone (95/5, vol/vol) for 20 minutes. The cultures were washed in PBS and incubated with BrdU antibody for 1 hour at room temperature, followed by an incubation with rabbit anti-tubulin antibody (ICN) for 30 minutes. After being washed in PBS, the cultures were incubated with donkey anti-rabbit IgG–Texas red (Sigma) to localize tubulin and to define the number of cells present. Cell fluorescence was observed with a confocal laser microscope (Bio-Rad MRC-600) set for detecting both FITC and Texas red. Cells in the first eight rows from the wound edge were counted for BrdU incorporation. Results were expressed as a proportion of the total cell population, and comparisons were made by Student's t test.

The effect of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone on cell proliferation was also studied in low-density culture. ECs were grown in 60-mm dishes in M199 (Whittaker) and divided into three groups (controls without drug or ethanol, 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone at 2.5 or 20 µmol/L, and controls with ethanol). The drug or ethanol was added 24 hours after plating. At confluence, cultures were trypsinized and 2x104 cells were replated in 35-mm culture dishes in M199 (Whittaker) to assess cell growth in the presence of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone or ethanol. Cell counts were performed using a Coulter counter on trypsinized plates 18 and 42 hours after plating. Results were expressed as the mean of three dishes for each time point, and comparisons were made by Student's t test.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
At the highest concentration of CsA (1600 ng/mL), confluence of the endothelial monolayer was delayed by 4 to 6 days and thus, wounding could not be performed. There was no significant inhibition of endothelial repair in the first 24 hours at CsA concentrations of 50 to 800 ng/mL (Table 1Down). Repair of endothelial wounds averaged 61±7 µm during the first 24 hours after wounding and 84±10 µm during the second 24-hour period in the control cultures containing ethanol and Tween 80. CsA concentrations of 200 and 400 ng/mL were associated with wound edge migration of 66±10 and 67±10 µm, respectively in the first 24 hours (P=NS). At CsA concentrations of 400 and 800 ng/mL, there was significant inhibition of healing in the second 24-hour period (Table 1Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of Immunosuppressive Agents on Endothelial Wound Repair

Endothelial wound repair in monolayers exposed to 6-mercaptopurine was comparable to that of control cultures: migration during the first 24-hour period was 59±9 µm for controls, 63±11 µm for a 6-mercaptopurine concentration of 25 ng/mL, and 63±10 µm for a 6-mercaptopurine concentration of 50 ng/mL. There were no differences in the 24-hour wound healing rates in endothelial cultures exposed to 25 to 50 ng/mL azathioprine compared with those of 6-mercaptopurine–treated cells (data not shown). There was an incremental dose-dependent inhibition of endothelial wound repair during the first 24 hours in response to 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone (Table 1Up and Fig 1Down). Even at the lowest dose tested (1.25 µmol/L, which corresponds to a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight), there was a significant reduction in wound repair at 24 hours (58±10 versus 77±2 µm, P<.005). However, this effect was lost in the second 24-hour period, suggesting that either the 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone had been metabolized or the ECs had overcome blockade. Readdition of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone at 24 hours significantly inhibited wound repair at 24 to 48 hours, from 73±14 to 37±8 µm (P<.005). The addition of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone to 200 ng/mL of CsA and to 50 ng/mL 6-mercaptopurine demonstrated no synergism between the drugs when compared with 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone alone (Fig 2Down).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Bar graph showing effect of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone on healing of wounded porcine aortic endothelial monolayers. There is a significant dose-dependent reduction in endothelial wound repair over the first 24 hours in the presence of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bar graph showing effect of immunosuppressive drug combinations on the repair of wounded porcine aortic endothelial monolayers. There is no synergistic effect of combinations of immunosuppressive agents. 6{alpha}-MP indicates 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone (µmol/L); mp, 6-mercaptopurine (ng/mL).

The delay in endothelial wound repair could be a result of a decrease in cell spreading, a delay in migration, or inhibition of endothelial proliferation, as the wound size was sufficient to require all three processes for closure. The effect of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone on cell spreading was assessed by measuring EC size at the wound edge. 6{alpha}-Methylprednisolone–treated cells were, on average, 22% larger than control cells (4.6±0.8 versus 3.7±0.8 10-3 mm2, P<.005).

Immunofluorescence staining was used to assess drug effects on vimentin, tubulin, and actin cytoskeletal responses to injury in the endothelial monolayers. There were no changes in actin, vimentin, or tubulin after exposure to CsA, azathioprine, or 6-mercaptopurine. In monolayers treated with 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone, the dense, peripheral band of actin, which normally dissolves before the initiation of cellular migration, persisted 24 hours after wounding when compared with untreated monolayers. This was particularly obvious in rows 6 through 10 from the wound edge (Fig 3Down).



View larger version (179K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Photomicrographs of a monolayer of porcine aortic ECs incubated with rhodamine-phalloidin to localize F-actin. Cells are at the wound edge 24 hours after incubation without (a) and with (b) 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone (20 µg/mL). Note preservation of dense, peripheral actin band in treated monolayers (b) ( magnification x2000; bar=20 µm). Arrows represent direction of the wound edge.

Immunofluorescence staining for {alpha}-tubulin was used to assess microtubule organization and centrosome location. The orientation of the centrosome from its resting orientation, ie, random with respect to the wound edge, is a critical event in directing the migration of the monolayer in response to injury.17 At 24 hours the proportion of centrosomes that had reoriented toward the wound edge was significantly reduced in 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone–treated monolayers (Table 2Down). There were no differences in centrosome orientation after exposure to cyclosporine, 6-mercaptopurine, or azathioprine (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Centrosome Orientation in Wounded Endothelial Monolayers at 24 Hours

Finally, the effect of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone on EC proliferation was assessed. Treatment of ECs with 2.5 or 20 µmol/L 6-methylprednisolone enhanced the incorporation of BrdU into the DNA of cells in the first 8 rows from the wound edge. In monolayers exposed to 2.5 µmol/L 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone, the proportion of proliferating cells was 58.0±4.3% compared with 47.9±1.7% (P<.02) for the controls. At 20 µmol/L 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone, 62.8±1.6% of the treated cells were proliferating compared with only 46.8±0.7% (P<.01) of the control cells. In contrast, treatment of low-density ECs with 6-methylprednisolone did not have any significant effect when cell proliferation was measured 42 hours after plating (data not shown).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The repair of endothelial wounds in vitro requires cell spreading if the wound is small22 and spreading, migration, and proliferation20 23 if the wound is large. In this series of experiments, we sought to test the hypothesis that immunosuppressive agents alone or in combination might inhibit the repair of wounded endothelial monolayers. A lack of healing of recurrent endothelial injury, which may be immunologic, could be a potential mechanism for the accelerated atherosclerosis that is commonly seen after transplantation.6 This would be consistent with data that have shown increased endothelial turnover in areas of predilection for spontaneous atherosclerosis.9 Previous studies have shown a specific sequence of cytoskeletal events that occur during the process of endothelial wound repair in vitro20 22 23 and in vivo.24 Within seconds of creating a wound in an endothelial monolayer, an influx of calcium is noted in adjacent cells.25 Centrosomes have been shown to translocate toward the wound edge as early as 10 seconds after wounding26 and certainly within 1 to 2 hours.22 23 24 The cells spread toward the wound by extension of their lamellipodia but without translocation, and the dense, peripheral band of actin microfilaments remains intact.23 If the wound remains open for longer than 1 hour, the cell undergoes a further series of changes.20 The dense, peripheral actin band is then disassembled, and the cell elongates and migrates toward the wound edge.

In these experiments 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone produced a significant, transient, dose-dependent inhibition of repair in this injured monolayer model, whereas CsA and 6-mercaptopurine had no effect. 6{alpha}-Methylprednisolone was used in this system because it is the metabolically active derivative of prednisone, the most commonly prescribed corticosteroid. Orally administered doses of 1 mg/kg body weight would correspond to serum prednisolone concentrations of 2.6 µmol/L if one assumes 100% conversion by the liver. The first response to endothelial injury is cell spreading,22 and a significant increase in EC size was noted in 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone–treated cultures. A similar increase in EC size was not seen when the metabolically inactive parent compound prednisone was tested.18 An increase in cell size should favor wound closure, and the marked reduction in endothelial wound repair in 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone-treated monolayers suggested that the effect must be on migration or proliferation. Studies using BrdU incorporation in the monolayer or measurement of proliferation in low-density cultures showed either no effect or a significant increase in the proliferation of 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone–treated ECs, suggesting that the major effect of corticosteroids on endothelial healing is on cell migration.

In endothelial monolayers, the presence of a wound edge, even when migration is inhibited, is enough to induce centrosome relocation.20 Centrosome redistribution precedes other cytoskeletal events in wound repair20 22 and requires intact microtubules24 and microtubule-microfilament interactions.27 Inhibition of transcription in wounded endothelial monolayers prevents both centrosome formation and wound repair.28 Cell migration requires not only active actin disassembly, which is triggered by calcium entry into the cell, but also transcription of specific genes.29 Cytoskeletal studies showed that 6-methylprednisolone transiently inhibited the formation and relocation of centrosomes toward the wound edge and delayed resorption of the dense, peripheral band of actin. It is interesting to speculate that glucocorticoids prevent the expression of specific genes that are involved in cytoskeletal rearrangement. Glucocorticoids block expression of other early-response and cytokine genes, either by inhibiting transcription or destabilizing mRNA.16 17 Migration, proliferation, and differentiation of ECs are important steps in angiogenesis, which is also inhibited by glucocorticoids.30 Glucocorticoids also inhibit the migration of retinal pigment ECs in vivo.31

Clinical and experimental evidence has suggested a correlation between corticosteroid use and the development of accelerated atherosclerosis. Exposure to corticosteroids after cardiac transplantation is associated with increased intimal thickness as measured by intravascular ultrasound,32 and the combination of increased cellular rejection and corticosteroids (ie, more injury and inhibition of repair) is associated with fulminant transplant coronary disease.33 There is further evidence to suggest that steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens after cardiac transplantation are associated with a lower incidence of transplant atherosclerosis.34 The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of rheumatic arthritis was recently found to be an independent risk factor for fatal cardiovascular events.19 In the setting of coronary artery angioplasty, restenosis was not prevented when methylprednisolone was used either as a single dose or on alternate days,35 suggesting, as noted in our in vitro culture, that the short half-life of this drug may be important in determining its ability to prevent cell migration. In vivo, a secondary effect of corticosteroid therapy, that of hyperglycemia, may also be active in preventing endothelial healing.36

Significant differences in endothelial responses to cyclosporine appear to depend on their vascular origin. Human umbilical vein EC proliferation is inhibited at cyclosporine concentrations greater than 625 ng/mL12 and rat microvascular EC growth is inhibited at 250 ng/mL,13 but rabbit aortic ECs are not inhibited at 5000 ng/mL.37 The inhibition of EC growth at 1600 ng/mL noted in our experiments is consistent with these studies. Inhibition of endothelial repair in the first 24 hours was not seen in our studies at CsA concentrations up to 800 ng/mL, as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography of the culture media. The small decreases in wound closure in the second 24-hour period at higher doses of CsA may reflect inhibition of proliferation, as this is the predominant response at this time point after endothelial wounding.28 There were no measurable effects on endothelial wound repair from azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine at clinically relevant concentrations.38

In summary, in this porcine arterial endothelial monolayer model, 6{alpha}-methylprednisolone transiently inhibited endothelial wound repair by delaying migration and cytoskeletal rearrangement. CsA showed significantly less inhibition of wound closure only 24 to 48 hours after wounding. The known predilection of atherosclerosis for sites of endothelial denudation and turnover would imply that any delay in the formation of a confluent endothelial monolayer may be pathophysiologically related to the development of atherosclerosis.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
BrdU = bromodeoxyuridine
CsA = cyclosporine A
EC(s) = endothelial cell(s)
M199 = medium 199


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by Medical Research Council of Canada grant MI-6485 (to Dr Gotlieb) and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario grant 1964 (to Dr Gotlieb). We thank S. Sarju for secretarial support.

Received February 12, 1993; accepted May 17, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990's. Nature. 1993;362:801-809. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ip JH, Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon J, Taubman, MB, Chesebro JH. Syndromes of accelerated atherosclerosis: role of vascular injury and smooth muscle cell proliferation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1667-1687. [Abstract]
  3. Billingham ME. Graft coronary disease: the lesions and the patients. Transplant Proc. 1989;21:3665-3668. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Stovin PGI, Sharples L, Hutter JA, Wallwork J, English TAH. Some prognostic factors for the development of transplant related coronary artery disease in human cardiac allografts. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991;10:38-44. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Eich D, Thompson JA, Ko D. Hypercholesterolemia in long term survivors of heart transplantation: an early marker of accelerated coronary artery disease. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991;10:45-49. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Fyfe AI. Transplant atherosclerosis: the clinical syndrome, pathogenesis and possible model of spontaneous atherosclerosis. Can J Cardiol. 1992;8:509-519. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Nitenberg A, Benvenuti C, Aptegar E, Antony I, Deleuze P, Loisance D, Cachera J-P. Acetylcholine-induced constriction of angiographically normal coronary arteries is not time dependent in transplant recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:151-158. [Abstract]
  8. Alonzo DR, Starek PK, Minick CR. Studies on the pathogenesis of atheroarteriosclerosis induced in rabbit cardiac allografts by the synergy of graft rejection and hypercholesterolemia. Am J Pathol. 1977;87:414-426.
  9. Davies PF, Remuzzi A, Gordon EJ, Dewey CF, Gimbrone MA. Turbulent fluid shear stress induces vascular endothelial cell turnover in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:2114-2117. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nievelstein PF, Fogelman AM, Mottino G, Frank JS. Lipid accumulation in rabbit aortic intima 2 hours after bolus infusion of low density lipoprotein: a deep etch and immunolocalization study of ultrarapidly frozen tissue. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:1795-1805. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Navab M, Hough GP, Stevenson LW, Drinkwater DC, Laks H, Fogelman AM. Monocyte migration in the subendothelial space of a coculture of adult human aortic endothelial and smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:1853-1860.
  12. Frantz B, Nordby EC, Bren G, Steffan N, Paya CV, Kincaid RL, Tocci MJ, O'Keefe SJ, O'Neill EA. Calcineurin acts in synergy with PMA to inactivated I{kappa}B/MAD3 and inhibitor of NF-{kappa}B. EMBO J. 1994;13:861-870. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Lau DCW, Wong KL, Hwang WS. Cyclosporine toxicity on cultured rat microvascular endothelial cells. Kidney Int. 1989;35:604-613. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Sharpe RJ, Arndt KA, Bauer SI, Maione TE. Cyclosporine inhibits basic fibroblast growth factor driven proliferation of human endothelial cells and keratinocytes. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1359-1362. [Abstract]
  15. Emeson EE, Shen M-L. Accelerated atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic C57BL/6J mice treated with cyclosporine. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1906-1913. [Abstract]
  16. Poon M, Megyesi J, Green RS, Zhang H, Rollins BJ, Safirstein R, Taubman MB. In vivo and in vitro inhibition of JE gene expression by glucocorticoids. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:22375-22379. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zanker B, Walz G, Wieder KJ, Strom TB. Evidence that glucocorticoids block expression of the human interleukin-6 gene by accessory cells. Transplantation. 1990;49:183-185. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Maca RD, Fry GL, Hoak JC. The effects of glucocorticoids on cultured human endothelial cells. Br J Haematol. 1978;38:501-509. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Wolfe F, Mitchell DM, Sibley JT, Fries JF, Bloch DA, Williams CA, Spitz PW, Haga M, Kleinheksel SM, Cathey MA. The mortality of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:481-494. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Ettenson DS, Gotlieb AI. Centrosomes, microtubules, and microfilaments in the reendothelialization and remodeling of double-sided in vitro wounds. Lab Invest. 1992;66:722-733. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Rosenthal AM, Gotlieb AI. Macrovascular endothelial cells from porcine aorta. In: Piper HM, ed. Cell Culture Techniques in Heart and Vessel Research. Bonn, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1990:117.
  22. Wong MKK, Gotlieb AI. The reorganization of microfilaments, centrosomes, and microtubules during in vitro small wound reendothelialization. J Cell Biol. 1988;107:1777-1783. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Coomber BL, Gotlieb AI. In vitro endothelial wound repair: interaction of cell migration and proliferation. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:215-222. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rodgers KA, Broden P, Kalnins VI, Gotlieb AI. The distribution of centrosomes in endothelial cells of non-wounded and wounded aortic organ cultures. Cell Tissue Res. 1986;243:223-227. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Drumheller PD, Hubbell JA. Local modulation of intracellular calcium levels near a single cell wound in human endothelial monolayers. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:1258-1265. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Mascardo RN, Sherline P. Insulin and multiplication-stimulating activity induce a very rapid centrosomal orientation response to wounding in endothelial cell monolayers. Diabetes. 1984;33:1099-1105.[Abstract]
  27. Gotlieb AI, McBurnie-May LM, Subrhamanyan L, Kalnins VI. Distribution of microtubule organizing centers in migrating endothelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1981;91:589-594. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ettenson DS, Gotlieb AI. In vitro large-wound re-endothelialization: inhibition of centrosome redistribution by transient inhibition of transcription after wounding prevents rapid repair. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:1270-1281. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Stossel TP. On the crawling of animal cells. Science. 1993;260:1086-1094. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Tobelem G. Endothelial cell growth: biology and pharmacology in relation to angiogenesis. Blood Coagulation Fibrinol. 1990;1:703-705. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Kishimoto N, Uyama M, Fukushima I, Yamada K, Nishikawa M, Ohkuma H. The effect of corticosteroids on the repair of the retinal pigment epithelium. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Japon. 1993;97:360-369.
  32. Valantine H, Pinto FJ, St Goar FG, Alderman EL, Popp RL. Intracoronary ultrasound imaging in heart transplant recipients: the Stanford experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992;11:S60-S64. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Gao S-Z, Hunt SA, Schroeder JS, Alderman E, Hill IR, Stinson EB. Does rapidity of development of transplant coronary artery disease portend a worse prognosis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1994;13:1119-1124. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Radley-Smith RC, Yacoub M. Long-term results of pediatric heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992;11:S277-S281. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Hoepp LM, Elbadawi A, Cohn M, Dachelet R, Peterson C, DeWeese JA. Steroids and immunosuppression: effect on anastomotic hyperplasia in femoral arterial Dacron bypass grafts. Arch Surg. 1979;114:273-276. [Abstract]
  36. Mascardo RN. The effects of hyperglycaemia on the directed migration of wounded endothelial cell monolayers. Metabolism. 1988;34:378-385.
  37. Ferns G, Reidy M, Ross R. Vascular effects of cyclosporine A in vivo and in vitro. Am J Pathol. 1990;137:403-413. [Abstract]
  38. Odlind B, Hartvig P, Lindstrom B, Lonnerhohm G, Tufveson G, Grefgerg N. Serum azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine levels and immunosuppressive activity after azathioprine in uremic patients. Int J Immunopharmacol. 1986;8:1-11.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. K. Patricia, R. Natarajan, A. N. Dooley, F. Hernandez, J.-L. Gu, J. A. Berliner, J. J. Rossi, J. L. Nadler, R. S. Meidell, and C. C. Hedrick
Adenoviral Delivery of a Leukocyte-Type 12 Lipoxygenase Ribozyme Inhibits Effects of Glucose and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor in Vascular Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells
Circ. Res., April 13, 2001; 88(7): 659 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fyfe, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gotlieb, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fyfe, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gotlieb, A. I.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*AZATHIOPRINE
*CYCLOSPORIN A
*METHYLPREDNISOLONE