Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:1057-1063

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elinder, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Walldius, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elinder, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Walldius, G.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:1057-1063.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Probucol Treatment Decreases Serum Concentrations of Diet-Derived Antioxidants

Liselotte Schäfer Elinder; Karin Hådell; Jan Johansson; Jørgen Mølgaard; Ingar Holme; Anders G. Olsson; Göran Walldius

From the Department of Internal Medicine, King Gustaf V Research Institute, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (L.S.E., J.J., G.W.); the Dietetics Department, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (K.H.); the Research Center of General Medicine, North West Health Board, Stockholm County Council, Sweden (J.J.); the Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden (J.M., A.G.O.); and The Life Insurance Companies Institute for Medical Statistics, Ullevål Hospital, Oslo, Norway (I.H.).

Correspondence to Liselotte Schäfer Elinder, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract The effect of probucol, which is both a cholesterol-lowering drug and an antioxidant, on the serum concentrations of diet-derived antioxidants vitamin E, ß-carotene, lycopene, and vitamin A was studied in 303 hypercholesterolemic subjects. In a 3-year, double-blind, randomized trial we investigated to determine whether combined treatment with diet, cholestyramine, and probucol could reduce the progression of femoral atherosclerosis. Serum and lipoprotein antioxidant levels were measured by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Cholestyramine significantly lowered serum concentrations of vitamin E by 7%, ß-carotene by 40%, and lycopene by 30% (all P<.001) due to impairment of gastrointestinal absorption and to serum cholesterol lowering. Probucol reduced serum vitamin E by 14% (P<.001) secondary to cholesterol and triglyceride lowering. The carotenoids were reduced by probucol by 30% to 40% (P<.001) most probably due to reductions in lipoprotein particle size and to competition with these substances for incorporation into VLDL during its assembly in the liver. This study shows that the use of a lipid-soluble antioxidant and cholesterol-lowering drug may have unfavorable effects on blood levels of diet-derived antioxidants.


Key Words: hypercholesterolemia • cholestyramine • probucol • vitamin E • ß-carotene


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Reduction of blood lipid levels and use of antioxidant therapy are currently two major approaches to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Probucol combines both strategies in one drug, which has created great expectations on its effect in humans. LDL from probucol-treated patients has been shown to be resistant to oxidative modification.1 2 3 In studies with the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit, probucol has been shown to inhibit atherosclerosis development.4 However, the first double-blind clinical trial in humans, from which the data in the present report are derived, showed no protective effect of probucol on femoral atherosclerosis development over a 3-year period in hypercholesterolemic subjects.5 One potential problem with probucol use in humans is that it lowers HDL,5 6 which is known to protect against cardiovascular disease.7

According to the oxidation hypothesis of atherosclerosis development,8 oxidative modification of LDL occurs in the arterial wall of subjects with atherosclerosis. Therefore we investigated the effect of the lipid-soluble antioxidant drug probucol on the serum and lipoprotein concentrations of the diet-derived and lipid-soluble antioxidants vitamin E ({alpha}-tocopherol), lycopene, {alpha}- and ß-carotene, and vitamin A, which has not previously been studied in-depth. Because probucol lowers serum cholesterol and cholesterol is a positive predictor of lipid-soluble antioxidants,9 direct as well as indirect actions of probucol on diet-derived antioxidants are possible. Whereas vitamin A is bound to retinol-binding protein in serum in a 1:1 complex,10 vitamin E, the carotenes, lycopene, and probucol are distributed to more than 95% in serum lipoproteins,11 12 13 where interactions among these substances could take place.

The present report shows that probucol lowers the serum concentration of all diet-derived antioxidants by mechanisms unrelated to its antioxidant properties.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population and Treatment
The Probucol Quantitative Regression Swedish Trial (PQRST) population consisted of 303 hypercholesterolemic patients under 71 years of age. All patients received dietary advice and cholestyramine as a basic treatment and either probucol or placebo. The design of the study, patient characteristics, and inclusion and exclusion criteria have been previously reported.5 A 6-month prerandomization phase was followed by a 3-year double-blind phase. Dietary habits were assessed by a combined method using menu registration and a dietary history interview.9 Dietary advice was given according to the American Heart Association Step 1 diet (total fat <30% of total calories, saturated fat <10% of total calories, and cholesterol <300 mg/d).14 Dietary habits were monitored repeatedly throughout the trial. After testing the effect of diet changes on serum lipids for 2 months in the prerandomization phase, cholestyramine was added for 2 months, followed by probucol for another 2 months. All patients randomized to probucol or placebo had visually detectable atherosclerosis on their femoral angiograms. Thirty-eight percent of all participants had clinical symptoms of cardiovascular disease. The dose of cholestyramine recommended to each patient varied according to tolerance, from 8 to 16 g/d. The mean dose of cholestyramine taken by the probucol and the placebo groups was not significantly different. The dosage of probucol or placebo was 0.5 g BID. Compliance with both drug regimens was estimated by patient interview and by pill count. Patients remained on their usual medication throughout the trial. The average consumption of other drugs did not differ between the groups.

The study was approved by the ethics committee at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden.

Laboratory Analysis
Serum samples were collected from all participants eight times during the 3-year trial and frozen at -70°C. The number of samples analyzed each time varied from 262 to 303 because of lack of sample material or technical reasons. All samples from one person were analyzed on the same day. In 84% of the patients all eight samples were available. Vitamin A (retinol), vitamin E ({alpha}-tocopherol), {alpha}- and ß-carotene, lycopene, and probucol were analyzed simultaneously by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography as described previously.15 A serum pool was stored at -70°C and analyzed daily. This gave the following coefficients of variation during a 2-year period: probucol 4.2%, {alpha}-tocopherol 7.2%, lycopene 12.3%, {alpha}-carotene 11.3%, ß-carotene 9.7%, and retinol 4.8%. The levels of all substances in the serum pool were stable. This was also true for a serum pool devoid of probucol.

LDL and VLDL were isolated from fasting fresh EDTA-plasma by ultracentrifugation in an NaCl gradient.16 HDL was isolated from EDTA-plasma by sequential ultracentrifugation in NaBr gradients.17 Cholesterol and triglycerides were determined by nonenzymatic methods,18 19 and protein was measured by Lowry's method, with bovine serum albumin as the protein standard.20

Antioxidants were analyzed in lipoprotein fractions in 15 consecutive patients who had been in the trial for about 2 years at the time of sampling. By chance the distribution of these patients between the probucol (n=10) and the placebo groups (n=5) was uneven. Antioxidants were extracted from 1-mL samples of nondialyzed lipoproteins in the same way as from serum samples.

HDL particle size was determined by gradient gel electrophoresis21 in a representative subset of the patients. The particles quantified were in decreasing size HDL2b, HDL2a, HDL3a, HDL3b, and HDL3c. LDL particle size was estimated by the ratio of LDL to apoB.22 ApoB was determined by radioimmunoassay according to the instructions given by the manufacturer (Pharmacia Diagnostics).

Statistical Analysis
The distributions of serum antioxidants were skewed, and these variables were therefore logarithmically transformed before being used in any statistical tests. The effects of the diet and drugs on serum antioxidants during the prerandomization phase were tested by Student's paired t test.

To determine whether probucol and cholestyramine exerted effects on serum concentrations of dietary antioxidants independent of their effects on serum lipids, multiple regression models were set up. Serum antioxidant concentrations were adjusted with regard to lipids using regression coefficients from the initial visit before any treatment was given. The individual means of the last three annual postrandomization measurements of each adjusted serum antioxidant were calculated and entered as the dependent variables in the final models. The average cholestyramine dose and serum probucol concentration of the last three annual measurements were entered as the predictors together with previously established predictors of serum lipid-soluble antioxidants, such as age, body mass index, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and dietary intake of vitamin E.9


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Compliance With Drug Regimens
Compliance with both drug regimens did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. By pill counting, the average dosage of cholestyramine taken was estimated to be 13.1±3.2 g/d (mean±SD) at year 1 and 12.7±3.8 g/d at year 3. The average dosage of probucol was 0.91±0.14 g/d at year 1 and 0.92±0.14 g/d at year 3.

Diet
The intake of major nutrients at the start of the study, before randomization, and after 3 years in the trial is given in Table 1Down. There were no significant differences in intake of major nutrients between the two treatment groups at any time, and the data were therefore pooled. Improvements in the dietary quality resulted in a lowering of fat and total energy intake as well as increases in the intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E. After randomization no major changes were made in the composition of the diet. The intake of major nutrients by the patients during the trial phase met the American Heart Association Step 1 diet criteria.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Composition of Diet

Lipids
Changes due to treatment in serum total cholesterol and total triglycerides are given in Fig 1Down. The probucol-induced reduction in serum cholesterol was reversed after 6 months in the placebo group. It took 12 months for serum triglycerides to return to the pre-probucol level.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Graphs showing serum lipid levels during cholesterol-lowering therapy with diet (D), cholestyramine (Q), and probucol (P) (solid line) or placebo (dashed line). Values are geometric means. Vertical bars indicate the 95% confidence limits. The prerandomization phase lasted 6 months, as indicated on the x axis. The diet treatment continued throughout the trial. After 2 months cholestyramine was added, followed by 2 months of probucol. The combined treatment was continued throughout the randomized trial. The horizontal line indicates the pre-probucol level of the placebo group.

Probucol
The serum probucol concentration of the patients in the two treatment groups is shown in Fig 2Down. At the time of randomization all patients had received probucol for 2 months, and after this no further increase in the serum probucol concentration was seen in the probucol group. Total cholesterol (r=.19, P<.001) and total triglycerides (r=.43, P<.001) were positively associated with the serum probucol concentration. ApoB concentration correlated positively with probucol (P<.01), whereas a negative correlation was seen between HDL cholesterol and probucol (P<.001). After 2 months on probucol the serum concentration ranged from 10 to 182 µmol/L, with a mean value of 60 µmol/L. Serum probucol decreased rapidly in the placebo group, but it did not reach zero even after 3 years.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph showing serum probucol concentration in patients treated with probucol (solid line) and placebo (dashed line) during the trial. Values are geometric means. See legend to Fig 1Up for explanation of abbreviations.

Serum Concentrations of Diet-Derived Antioxidants
The serum concentrations of vitamin E, ß-carotene, lycopene, and vitamin A during cholesterol-lowering therapy are given in Fig 3Down. {alpha}-Carotene concentration paralleled that of ß-carotene. During the prerandomization phase there were no significant differences in serum antioxidants between the treatment groups. Diet therapy resulted in a slight increase in serum antioxidants, both treatment groups taken together, that was only significant for vitamin E (P<.05). After 2 months on cholestyramine, the mean serum vitamin E decreased by 7% (P<.001), ß-carotene by 40% (P<.001), and lycopene by 30% (P<.001), whereas vitamin A increased by 5% (P<.001). The addition of probucol to the regimen resulted in an additional significant decrease of the concentration of vitamin E by 14%, ß-carotene by 39%, and lycopene by 30% (all P<.001). Thus, the combined effects of cholestyramine and probucol were to reduce vitamin E by 18%, ß-carotene by 65%, and lycopene by 51%, relative to their pretreatment values.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Graphs showing serum concentrations of serum vitamin E, lycopene, ß-carotene, and vitamin A in patients treated with probucol (solid line) and placebo (dashed line) during the trial. Values are geometric means. See legend to Fig 1Up for explanation of abbreviations.

After randomization the serum concentrations of vitamin E, {alpha}- and ß-carotene, and lycopene increased significantly (all P<.001) in the placebo group, returning to the pre-probucol level (see Fig 3Up). For vitamin E this occurred within 6 months, but it took 1 to 2 years for lycopene and ß-carotene to return to their pre-probucol levels. The vitamin A concentration decreased steadily throughout the trial in both treatment groups (see Fig 3Up). Serum vitamin A was 11% lower in the placebo group at the end of the study compared with the beginning of the study (P<.001).

The results of multiple regression analyses are presented in Table 2Down. Probucol and cholestyramine were not significant predictors of serum vitamin E after adjustments for lipids were made. Another way of demonstrating this finding was to express serum vitamin E relative to serum cholesterol plus triglycerides. We found a steady increase in this ratio, from 4.5 to 5.5 µmol vitamin E per mmol lipids, during the prerandomization phase when all patients were given the same treatment. After randomization the two treatment groups had almost identical values, {approx}5.4 µmol/mmol, throughout the study. In contrast, significant negative and lipid-independent effects of cholestyramine and/or probucol were found on serum ß-carotene and lycopene. Essentially the same results were obtained in additional statistical models, taking into account the possibility that the associations between serum antioxidants and serum lipids changed over time.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Regression Models With Lipid-Adjusted Serum Antioxidants as Dependent Variables

The mean concentrations of diet-derived antioxidants were higher in all lipoproteins in the placebo group compared with the probucol group (Table 3Down). Because of the limited number of samples the differences were not statistically significant in all cases. Patients in the probucol group displayed a shift of antioxidants from HDL to LDL when expressed as a percentage of the total content in lipoproteins (shown in parentheses in Table 3Down). When expressed as molecules per gram of protein, probucol was the major antioxidant in all lipoprotein classes in the probucol group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Distribution of Lipid-Soluble Antioxidants in Lipoproteins

The associations between serum antioxidant concentrations and lipoprotein lipids were analyzed. Both vitamin E (P<.001) and ß-carotene (P<.01) correlated positively with LDL cholesterol throughout the study. However, only {alpha}-carotene (P<.05) and ß-carotene (P<.001) correlated positively with HDL cholesterol. We found that ß-carotene correlated positively with HDL2b, expressed as its serum protein concentration (r=.35, P<.01, n=61, before lipid lowering), whereas with HDL3b the association was negative (r=-.32, P<.05, n=61). In contrast to the carotenes, vitamin E correlated positively (P<.001) with apoB, the concentration of which is proportional to the number of LDL particles, throughout the trial. LDL particle size was estimated as the ratio of LDL cholesterol to apoB, with a larger value indicating a larger particle. Serum vitamin E was negatively but nonsignificantly associated with this ratio at all times, whereas ß-carotene showed a positive and consistent association (P<.01) with LDL particle size. Positive relationships were also found between LDL particle size and {alpha}-carotene and lycopene, but they were weaker than for ß-carotene. At the end of the trial the HDL protein concentration was significantly lower (P<.001) in the probucol group (n=35) compared with the placebo group (n=37); in particular, the HDL2b concentration was 69% lower (P<.001). Furthermore, the apoB concentration was 8% lower in the probucol group and the LDL cholesterol–apoB ratio was 5% lower (P<.05) than in the placebo group. Thus, probucol treatment resulted in major reductions in HDL particle number and size and in minor reductions in LDL particle number and size.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The main finding of the present study was that probucol, an antioxidant drug, reduced the serum concentrations of diet-derived lipid-soluble antioxidants in hypercholesterolemic patients with established atherosclerotic disease. According to the oxidation hypothesis of atherosclerosis development,8 the opposite result was expected, namely, that probucol should protect the natural antioxidants against oxidation and thus lead to higher serum levels of these substances. The lowering of serum levels of the antioxidants was not caused by dietary differences between the treatment groups. To our knowledge there are no data suggesting that probucol could act as a pro-oxidant in vitro or in vivo. Therefore, the mechanism whereby probucol lowered the serum concentrations of diet-derived antioxidants must be unrelated to its antioxidant properties.

Serum vitamin E decreased in response to lipid lowering induced by cholestyramine and probucol. In agreement with our results, Paterson et al23 found no change in plasma vitamin E relative to cholesterol in a small uncontrolled probucol trial lasting for 16 weeks. The reductions in serum carotenoids in our trial were larger than could be explained by lipid lowering alone. The most likely explanation for the effect of cholestyramine was that it reduced the intestinal absorption of the lipophilic carotenoids, because cholestyramine is known to decrease the absorption of lipids.24

The reductions in both HDL and LDL particle size induced by probucol were clearly undesirable, because small particles are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis.7 25 Serum carotenes, but not vitamin E, were found to correlate positively with LDL and HDL particle size. The reason for this difference is probably based on differences in polarity of vitamin E and the carotenes. ß-Carotene, which is more hydrophobic than vitamin E and probucol, is likely to be located in the lipoprotein core,26 whereas vitamin E and probucol probably distribute throughout a lipoprotein particle and are therefore less dependent on the core size. It has previously been shown that the ß-carotene content of bovine HDL is dependent on particle size, being absent from particles with diameters less than 10 nm.27 According to our data the average number of probucol and vitamin E molecules per HDL particle is {approx}1, if it is assumed that the molecular weight of a particle is 250 kD and that 50% of its mass is protein.12 In contrast, only 1 out of 150 to 400 HDL particles contained 1 molecule of lycopene and ß-carotene. There were 16 molecules of probucol and 11 molecules of vitamin E per LDL particle if it is assumed that the molecular weight of LDL is approximately 2500 kD and the protein content is 22%.28 Lycopene and ß-carotene would be found in approximately every fifth LDL particle. Taken together these data demonstrate that particle size and number are important determinants of the content of lipid-soluble antioxidants. For vitamin E, particle number is decisive, whereas for the carotenes the size of a particle is the most important factor. The serum concentration of probucol, which lowers primarily HDL cholesterol, appears also to be a function of lipoprotein lipids and particle number.

In the present study there was a 35% reduction in HDL cholesterol because of therapy with probucol, whereas LDL cholesterol was only reduced by 3%.5 The reduction in HDL mass by probucol resulted in a shift of antioxidants toward LDL, confirming previous in vitro findings that HDL will readily donate vitamin E to LDL and VLDL if the ratio of HDL to LDL is decreased.12

Another mechanism whereby probucol may reduce serum carotenoids takes place during VLDL assembly in the liver. There is little discrimination between the tocopherols (all vitamin E isomers) and the carotenes during absorption and chylomicron formation in intestinal cells. However, in the liver there is a preferential incorporation of RRR-{alpha}-tocopherol, the naturally occurring stereoisomer of vitamin E, into VLDL. This is due to the stereoselectivity of the hepatic tocopherol transfer protein.29 Once located in VLDL, hydrophobic molecules are more or less trapped in apoB-containing lipoproteins during the conversion to LDL. However, some surface components and core lipids (including antioxidants) are transferred directly from chylomicrons to HDL.13 26 Carotenoids and other tocopherol isomers that remain in chylomicron remnants on their way to the liver are incorporated into VLDL in a nonspecific manner,26 and it can be reasonably assumed that this is also the case for probucol. Our results nevertheless show that probucol was very efficiently packed into VLDL, thereby probably displacing the carotenoids.

The steady decline in the serum vitamin A concentration in both treatment groups during the trial was probably caused by interference of cholestyramine with intestinal absorption of vitamin A and/or its precursor ß-carotene. Probucol therapy resulted in an additional reduction of serum vitamin A by 8% to 10%. This was most likely explained by the 10% lowering of serum triglycerides by probucol, because some vitamin A associates with triglyceride-rich lipoproteins.10 Therefore, hypertriglyceridemic patients display elevated serum vitamin A levels,9 and variations in serum triglycerides are mirrored by changes in serum vitamin A.

In conclusion, probucol lowered the serum concentrations of diet-derived antioxidants most likely by reducing lipoprotein particle number and size. In addition probucol competed with carotenoid substances for incorporation into VLDL in the liver. Our findings emphasize the importance of lipoprotein particle size as one predictor of serum ß-carotene concentration. This is of great importance when comparing serum carotenoids in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease, who are known to display differences in lipoprotein particle size. Whether or not these changes in lipid-soluble antioxidants in the probucol group had any influence on the outcome of the trial is subject to further analysis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was funded by the Marion Merrell Dow Research Institute, Kansas City, Mo, the Swedish Margarine Industrial Association for Nutritional Research, the King Gustaf V 80th Birthday Fund, the Nanna Swartz Fund, and the Swedish Medical Research Foundation No. 06962. The excellent technical assistance of Malin Liljeström and Kerstin Carlson is gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful to Inger Malmaeus and Björn Gustafsson at Sema Group InfoData AB.

Received March 15, 1995; accepted May 30, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Regnström J, Walldius G, Carlson LA, Nilsson J. Effect of probucol treatment on the susceptibility of low density lipoprotein isolated from hypercholesterolemic patients to become oxidatively modified in vitro. Atherosclerosis. 1990;82:43-51. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Reaven PD, Parthasarathy S, Beltz WF, Witztum JL. Effect of probucol dosage on plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels and on protection of low density lipoprotein against in vitro oxidation in humans. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:318-324. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cristol LS, Jialal I, Grundy SM. Effect of low dose probucol therapy on LDL oxidation and the plasma lipoprotein profile in male volunteers. Atherosclerosis. 1992;97:11-20. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Nagano Y, Nakamura T, Matsuzawa Y, Cho M, Ueda Y, Kita T. Probucol and atherosclerosis in the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit—long-term antiatherogenic effect and effects on established plaques. Atherosclerosis. 1992;92:131-140. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Walldius GW, Erikson U, Olsson A, Bergstrand L, Hådell K, Johansson J, Kaijser L, Lassvik C, Mölgaard J, Nilsson S, Elinder LS, Stenport G, Holme I. The effect of probucol on femoral atherosclerosis. The Probucol Quantitative Regression Swedish Trial. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:875-883. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Bagdade JD, Kaufmann D, Ritter MC, Subbaiah PV. Probucol treatment in hypercholesterolemic patients: effects on lipoprotein composition, HDL particle size, and cholesteryl ester transfer. Atherosclerosis. 1990;84:145-154. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Tribble DL, Krauss RM. HDL and coronary artery disease. Adv Int Med. 1993;38:1-29.
  8. Steinberg D, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Khoo JC, Witztum JL. Modifications of low-density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:915-924. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Elinder LS, Hådell K, Johansson J, Mølgaard J, Olsson AG, Walldius G. Serum lipid-soluble antioxidants in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 1994;4:197-203.
  10. Blomhoff R, Green MH, Balmer Green J, Berg T, Norum K. Vitamin A metabolism: new perspectives on absorption, transport, and storage. Physiol Rev. 1991;71:951-990. [Free Full Text]
  11. Urien S, Riant P, Albengres E, Brioude R, Tillement JP. In vitro studies on the distribution of probucol among human plasma lipoproteins. Mol Pharmacol. 1984;26:322-327. [Abstract]
  12. Traber MG, Lane JC, Lagmay NR, Kayden HJ. Studies on the transfer of tocopherol between lipoproteins. Lipids. 1992;27:657-663. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Johnson EJ, Russell RM. Distribution of orally administered ß-carotene among lipoproteins in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56:128-135. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. National Cholesterol Education Program. Report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:36-69. [Abstract]
  15. Elinder LS, Walldius G. Simultaneous measurement of serum probucol and lipid-soluble antioxidants. J Lipid Res. 1992;33:131-137. [Abstract]
  16. Redgrave TG, Carlson LA. Changes in plasma very low density and low density lipoprotein content, composition, and size after a fatty meal in normo- and hypertriglyceridemic man. J Lipid Res. 1979;20:217-229. [Abstract]
  17. Havel RJ, Eder HA, Bragdon JH. The distribution and chemical composition of ultracentrifugally separated lipoproteins in human serum. J Clin Invest. 1955;34:1345-1353.
  18. Zlatkis A, Zak B, Boyle AJ. A new method for the direct determination of serum cholesterol. Clin Med. 1953;41:486-490.
  19. Fletcher MJ. A colorimetric method for estimating serum triglycerides. Clin Chim Acta. 1968;22:393-397.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall R. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265-270. [Free Full Text]
  21. Johansson J, Mölgaard J, Olsson AG, Walldius G. Effects of probucol treatment on HDL particle size subclass concentrations as assessed by gradient gel electrophoresis. In: Carlson LA, ed. Disorders of HDL. London, UK: Smith-Gordon/Nishimura; 1990:209-213.
  22. Meredith IT, Anderson TJ, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Dyce MC. The relationship between endothelial function and indices of LDL particle size and number in human coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1994;109:258. Abstract.
  23. Paterson JR, Rumley AG, Oldroy KG, Tait GW, Smellie WSA, Packard CJ, Shepherd J, Lorimer AR. Probucol reduces plasma lipid peroxides in man. Atherosclerosis. 1992;97:63-66. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. West RJ, Lloyd JK. The effect of cholestyramine on intestinal absorption. Gut. 1975;16:93-98. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Slyper AH. Low-density lipoprotein density and atherosclerosis. JAMA. 1994;272:305-308. [Abstract]
  26. Traber M, Diamond SR, Lane JC, Brody RI, Kayden H. B-carotene transport in human lipoproteins. Comparisons with a-tocopherol. Lipids. 1994;29:665-669. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Ashes JR, Burley RW, Sidhu GS, Sleigh RW. Effect of particle size and lipid composition of bovine blood high density lipoprotein on its function as a carrier of ß-carotene. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984;797:171-177. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Esterbauer H, Gebicki J, Jürgens G. The role of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in oxidative modification of LDL. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992;13:341-390. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Kayden H, Traber M. Absorption, lipoprotein transport, and regulation of plasma concentrations of vitamin E in humans. J Lipid Res. 1993;34:343-358.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. W. Hadley, S. K. Clinton, and S. J. Schwartz
The Consumption of Processed Tomato Products Enhances Plasma Lycopene Concentrations in Association with a Reduced Lipoprotein Sensitivity to Oxidative Damage
J. Nutr., March 1, 2003; 133(3): 727 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
T. W.-M. Boileau, A. C. Boileau, and J. W. Erdman Jr
Bioavailability of all-trans and cis-Isomers of Lycopene
Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 1, 2002; 227(10): 914 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
O. Cynshi, Y. Kawabe, T. Suzuki, Y. Takashima, H. Kaise, M. Nakamura, Y. Ohba, Y. Kato, K. Tamura, A. Hayasaka, et al.
Antiatherogenic effects of the antioxidant BO-653 in three different animal models
PNAS, August 18, 1998; 95(17): 10123 - 10128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. A. Bird, R. K. Tangirala, J. Fruebis, D. Steinberg, J. L. Witztum, and W. Palinski
Effect of probucol on LDL oxidation and atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 1998; 39(5): 1079 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Y.-J. Wu, C.-Y. Hong, S.-J. Lin, P. Wu, and M.-S. Shiao
Increase of Vitamin E Content in LDL and Reduction of Atherosclerosis in Cholesterol-Fed Rabbits by a Water-Soluble Antioxidant-Rich Fraction of Salvia miltiorrhiza
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 1998; 18(3): 481 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elinder, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Walldius, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elinder, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Walldius, G.