Articles |
From the Department of Pediatrics (T.O., R.N., Y.I., I.M.), Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Kumamoto, the Department of Internal Medicine (K.S.), Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, and the Hiroshima Railway Hospital (K.T.), Hiroshima, Japan.
Correspondence to Dr Takao Ohta, Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto-City Kumamoto 860, Japan. E-mail ohta@gpo.kumamotou.ac.jp.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: apoA-Icontaining lipoproteins LCAT LpA-I LpA-I/A-II reverse cholesterol transport
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LpA-I is itself composed of heterogeneous particles; three major subclasses (large, medium, and small LpA-I) have been characterized.11 12 Several studies have postulated that these subclasses are metabolically distinct and that plasma concentrations of LpA-I are mainly associated with those of large LpA-I, which suggests that large LpA-I may be a more specific marker for the risk of premature coronary heart disease and thus the more antiatherogenic subclass.12 13 14 We have shown that the relative amount of large LpA-I in HDL regulates the reactivity of HDL to lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT).15 Since the reactivity of HDL to LCAT is believed to be a key step in net cellular cholesterol efflux,9 16 17 as a first step in examining the underlying mechanism of the antiatherogenic nature of LpA-I we investigated the effect of large LpA-I on the rate of cholesterol esterification in HDL and plasma and on the cellular cholesterolreducing capacity of LpA-I.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of LpA-I and LpA-I/A-II From Plasma
LpA-I and LpA-I/A-II were isolated from the plasma samples by a
combination of antiapoA-I and antiapoA-II immunosorbent
columns.2 9 Briefly, plasma was applied to an antiapoA-I
column. After washing extensively with 10 mmol/L Tris, 500 mmol/L NaCl,
and 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 7.5 (buffer A), the column was eluted with 100
mmol/L acetic acid and 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 3.0. Each effluent was
immediately adjusted to pH 7.4 with 1 mol/L Tris solution and dialyzed
against 150 mmol/L NaCl and 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 7.4 (buffer B). Finally,
the sample was concentrated in buffer B by using an ultrafiltration
cell (Amicon Corp) equipped with a PM-10 membrane and then applied to
an antiapoA-II column. The column was washed with buffer A to obtain
LpA-I. The bound fraction was eluted from the column to obtain
LpA-I/A-II. Both LpA-I and LpA-I/A-II were dialyzed and concentrated in
buffer B. By using this procedure, >90% of the lipids and
apolipoproteins applied were recovered in both the unbound and bound
fractions. When the unbound plasma fraction from the antiapoA-I
column was applied to an antiapoA-II column, no bound fraction was
obtained. Thus, we believe that all the plasma apoA-II was associated
with apoA-I as LpA-I/A-II in our study subjects.
Subfractionation of LpA-I
Five sets of LpA-I isolated from five pooled plasma samples were
subfractionated into HDL2 (d=1.063 to
1.125 g/mL) and HDL3 (d=1.125 to 1.21 g/mL) by
ultracentrifugation at 150 000g for 48 hours at
4°C.18 These subfractions were dialyzed against
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were used in the following
experiments immediately after isolation.
Isolation of LDP
LDP was isolated from fresh plasma by the method of Barter et
al.19 The supernatant that was recovered after
ultracentrifugation at 150 000g for 48 hours
(d=1.25 g/mL) was subjected to a second 48-hour spin at
d=1.25 g/mL, after which the upper third of the infranatant
was recovered and added to the first 1.25-g/mL infranatant. LDP was
concentrated twofold and dialyzed against PBS.
Fractional and Molar Esterification Rates in Plasma and VLDL- and
LDL-Depleted Plasma
Fractional and molar esterification rates in plasma and VLDL-
and LDL-depleted plasma were determined by a modification of the
methods of Dobiasova et al.20 VLDL- and LDL-depleted
plasma was prepared by precipitating VLDL and LDL with
phosphotungstate-MgCl2.21 22
[3H]Free cholesterol (FC) was incorporated onto
polystyrene tissue-culture wells (Corning) as follows. Absolute ethanol
(100 µL) containing 0.2 µCi [3H]FC was placed in
wells and then dried by flushing with nitrogen. One hundred microliters
of either plasma sample in 400 µL PBS was added to each well for
determining the molar rate of cholesterol esterification in plasma
(MERplasma), or, for VLDL- and LDL-depleted plasma samples, for
determining the fractional esterification rate in HDL (FERHDL). The
[3H]FC was then equilibrated with the FC in each sample
by incubation at 4°C for 16 hours. After this the
[3H]FC-labeled plasma or VLDL- and LDL-depleted plasma
samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. The enzyme reaction
was stopped by immersing the sample tubes in an ice bath. The lipids in
the incubation samples were extracted with methanol/chloroform (2:1,
vol/vol), and the extract was dried by flushing with nitrogen and
dissolved in 60 µL isopropanol. Aliquots (20 µL) of lipid extracts
were spotted in duplicate on a thin-layer chromatography plate (Merck)
and developed in n-hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid/methanol
(85:20:1:1, vol/vol/vol/vol). Spots corresponding to FC and cholesterol
esters (CE) were cut from the plate, and the radioactivities were
determined. The increase in [3H]CE was linear over 30
minutes of incubation. The fractional esterification rate was expressed
as the difference between the percentage of radioactive cholesterol
esterified before and after incubation at 37°C, and the molar rate of
cholesterol esterification (micromoles per hour per liter) was
calculated based on the specific activity (disintegrations per minute
per nanomole FC) of each sample.
Assay of Cholesterol Esterification in Samples Containing Varying
Proportions of HDL2 and HDL3
Subfractions of LpA-I
Subfractions of LpA-I were labeled with [3H]FC as
follows. Absolute ethanol (100 µL) containing 15 µCi
[3H]FC was placed in culture wells, and the ethanol was
dried by flushing with nitrogen. Each lipoprotein or various mixtures
of subfractions (200 to 1000 nmol FC) in 1 mL PBS was then added to the
wells, and the [3H]FC was equilibrated with the FC in
each sample by incubation at 4°C for 16 hours. Aliquots of
[3H]FC-labeled lipoproteins were made up to a constant
volume of 100 µL by adding PBS. LDP (50 µL) was then added to each
incubation tube as an LCAT source, and the mixtures were incubated at
37°C for 30 minutes in a shaking water bath. The reaction was stopped
by immersing the tubes in an ice bath. Lipid extraction and separation
of FC and CE by thin-layer chromatography were performed as described
above. The increase in [3H]CE was linear over 30 minutes
of incubation. The cholesterol esterification rate was expressed as the
difference between the percentage of radioactive cholesterol esterified
before and after incubation at 37°C, and the esterified cholesterol
mass was calculated based on the specific activity (disintegrations per
minute per nanomole FC) of each sample.
Cholesterol Efflux From Macrophage Foam Cells
Experiments for determining cholesterol efflux from foam cells
were performed.9 16 Briefly, peritoneal macrophages from
Wistar rats were harvested in PBS and suspended in Dulbecco's modified
minimal essential medium containing 3% bovine serum albumin (medium
A). The cell suspension was placed in 22-mm plastic dishes, and the
preparation was incubated for 4 hours. Adherent macrophages were
converted to foam cells by a 16-hour incubation with 100 µg/mL acetyl
LDL in 1.0 mL medium A. These foam cells were subjected to efflux
assays by incubation with medium A containing 100 µL LDP (an LCAT
source) and subclasses of LpA-I (300 µg protein each) or a
combination of subclasses (HDL3, 300 µg protein;
HDL2, 100 to 300 µg protein). Plasma
concentrations of LCAT enzyme mass do not correlate with those of
apoA-I and are fairly constant.23 Thus, to create a
plasma-like environment, we did not change the amount of LDP in the
efflux experiments, despite different concentrations of effector
protein. Parallel incubations without lipoproteins served as controls.
The culture medium was removed 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the onset
of the efflux experiments, and the cellular lipids were then extracted.
Unless otherwise specified, the data derived from these efflux assays
were the mean of quintuplicate runs in five separate experiments. FC
and CE were extracted directly from macrophage monolayers. The mass of
FC and CE was quantified by a modification of the method of Heider and
Boyett.24
Protein and Lipid Analysis
ApoA-I and apoA-II concentrations in plasma, LpA-I, and
LpA-I/A-II were measured by radial immunodiffusion
assay.25 26 The total cholesterol (TC), FC, triglyceride,
and phospholipid concentrations of these samples were determined by
enzymatic methods by using commercial kits. The concentrations of CE
were calculated as (TC-FC)x1.62. HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured
by selective precipitation of LDL using
phosphotungstate-MgCl2.21 22 The protein
content of each fraction from the immunosorbent columns was determined
by the method of Lowry et al.27 To estimate the plasma
concentrations, values of lipids and apolipoproteins in LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II were corrected based on the percent recoveries during the
isolation.
Electrophoretic Analysis
The apparent hydrated particle diameters of LpA-I and LpA-I/A-II
were estimated by gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on
Pharmacia precast PAA 4/30 gels according to the procedure specified by
the manufacturer. Electrophoresis calibration kits for
high-molecular-weight proteins (Pharmacia) were used. The
Stokes' diameters of these high-molecular-weight proteins are (in nm)
thyroglobulin, 17.0; apoferritin, 12.2; catalase, 10.4; lactate
dehydrogenase, 8.2; and bovine albumin, 7.5. The stained gels were
scanned with a laser scanning densitometer (model CS-9000, Shimadzu).
The areas corresponding to particles were calculated after
integration.
Statistical Evaluation
Linear regression analysis and paired and unpaired
t tests were used to evaluate the data.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Relation Between Plasma Concentrations of LpA-I and Those of Its
Subclasses
We have found small age- and sex-related differences in
LpA-I.2 28 However, most of these differences were
quantitative. Recently, Duverger et al11 confirmed our
findings and extended them to subspecies of LpA-I. Therefore, we did
not consider age and sex in the present study.
On the basis of particle diameter, three subspecies of LpA-I were
identified by densitometric scan of gradient gels: large (11.1 nm;
LgLpA-I), medium (8.8 nm; MdLpA-I), and small (7.7 nm; SmLpA-I)
(Fig 1
). These particles were distributed as follows:
LgLpA-I, 65±9%; MdLpA-I, 29±4%; and SmLpA-I, 6±5%. More
than 96% of the particles in the HDL2 fraction of
LpA-I were LgLpA-I (Fig 1B
and 1C
). On the other hand, the
HDL3 fraction of LpA-I consisted mostly of MdLpA-I and
SmLpA-I. The chemical composition of these subspecies is summarized
in the Table
. The percentage of FC, the ratio of FC to
CE, and the ratio of lipid to protein were all significantly higher in
LgLpA-I (HDL2 fraction) than in MdLpA-I and
SmLpA-I combined [(Md+Sm)LpA-I] (HDL3 fraction)
(P<.005).
|
|
We determined the plasma concentrations of these subspecies based on
their percent distribution and the plasma concentration of LpA-I
(expressed as grams of protein per liter of plasma). Plasma
concentrations of LpA-I were strongly correlated with those of
LgLpA-I (Fig 2
). However, there was no correlation
with either MdLpA-I or SmLpA-I. Plasma concentrations of HDL-C were
also correlated with those of LgLpA-I (r=.72,
P<.0001) but not with those of MdLpA-I or SmLpA-I
(r=.08, P>.59 and r=.04,
P>.88, respectively). These results indicate that plasma
concentrations of LpA-I and HDL-C apparently depend on their content of
LgLpA-I.
|
Relation Between Plasma Concentrations of LgLpA-I and Cholesterol
Esterification in Plasma and HDL
Since most plasma CE is generated in HDL particles,29
we examined the relation of LpA-I and LgLpA-I to the rate of
cholesterol esterification in plasma and HDL. FERHDL was estimated by
the cholesterol esterification rate in VLDL- and LDL-depleted plasma.
Plasma concentrations of LpA-I were inversely correlated with FERHDL,
and a much stronger inverse correlation was observed between
LgLpA-I and FERHDL (Fig 3
). This suggests that the
reactivity of HDL to LCAT protein in plasma is determined by the
concentration of LpA-I, especially that of LgLpA-I. Since LCAT
associated with HDL can esterify cholesterol derived from VLDL and
LDL,16 we studied the effect of LpA-I and LgLpA-I on
MERplasma. Plasma concentrations of LpA-I and LgLpA-I were also
inversely correlated with MERplasma (r=-.46,
P<.0015 and r=-.41, P<.0015,
respectively). In contrast, plasma concentrations of MdLpA-I and
SmLpA-I did not correlate with either FERHDL or MERplasma. Thus, all
our data suggest that LgLpA-I contributes to the regulation of CE
production in plasma. To clarify this regulatory mechanism, we then
examined the role of subclasses of LpA-I on CE production.
|
Effect of LgLpA-I on Rate of Cholesterol Esterification in
Incubations Containing (Md+Sm)LpA-I
To create a plasma-like environment, we used LDP as an LCAT source
instead of purified LCAT. LgLpA-I suppressed the rate of cholesterol
esterification in (Md+Sm)LpA-I in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 4
). A similar suppression of the molar rate of
cholesterol esterification by LgLpA-I was observed in incubations
with LpA-I/A-II particles (data not shown). These results suggest that
plasma CE is mainly generated in MdLpA-I, SmLpA-I, and LpA-I/A-II
particles, while LgLpA-I particles regulate the interaction between
LCAT and other apoA-Icontaining particles. As a result, LgLpA-I
particles regulate CE production in plasma.
|
Effect of Subclasses of LpA-I on Net Cholesterol Efflux From
Macrophage Foam Cells
Because LCAT activity is required for the efficient removal of
cellular cholesterol by LpA-I,9 16 we next studied the
effect of LpA-I subclasses on net cellular cholesterol efflux. Since
LCAT activity in isolated subfractions is lost during
ultracentrifugation, to restore LCAT activity to the subspecies of
LpA-I we added LDP as an LCAT source when we incubated the subspecies
of LpA-I with foam cells. The amount of LDP added was determined based
on the finding that LpA-I isolated by immunoaffinity chromatography
normally esterifies 25% to 30% of its own FC after incubation for 16
hours at 37°C.9 We reisolated immunopurified LpA-I by
ultracentrifugation (d=1.21 g/mL) for 22 hours. The LCAT
activity of LpA-I was completely lost during ultracentrifugation. We
then added varying amounts of LDP to reisolated LpA-I, and the percent
esterification of its own FC was determined. The amount of LDP used in
the following experiments (100 µL) restored the rate of cholesterol
esterification in reisolated LpA-I (300 µg protein) to a level
similar to that in the original LpA-I (300 µg protein). The
cholesterol-reducing capacity of LgLpA-I was much less than that of
(Md+Sm)LpA-I (Fig 5
). Similar results were obtained when
the experiments were performed using smaller amounts of these
subclasses (50 to 200 µg protein of each subclass) (data not shown).
Since plasma concentrations of LpA-I are positively correlated with
concentrations of LgLpA-I (Fig 2
), we added LgLpA-I to constant
amounts of (Md+Sm)LpA-I and found that the cholesterol-reducing
capacity of (Md+Sm)LpA-I was inhibited by LgLpA-I (Fig 5
). In our
assay system, net cellular cholesterol reduction mediated by subclasses
of LpA-I and combinations of such subclasses was not observed at 3
hours of incubation. Net cellular cholesterol reduction at 6 and 12
hours of incubation was less than that at 24 hours of incubation.
However, the relative abilities of LgLpA-I and (Md+Sm)LpA-I were
similar to those at 24 hours of incubation [(Md+Sm)LpA-I>LgLpA-I],
and inhibition by LgLpA-I was also observed. Thus, Fig 5
shows data
only at 24 hours of incubation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most plasma CE is generated in HDL by the action of plasma
LCAT.29 However, plasma LCAT enzyme mass does not
correlate with the rate of CE production in plasma.30 31 32
Compared with the variation in the rate of plasma CE production, that
of plasma LCAT enzyme mass is fairly constant.20 23 Thus,
the substrate specificity for LCAT seems to be
important.15 19 20 LgLpA-I has the lowest apparent
Km and lowest Vmax to LCAT
among the subspecies of apoA-Icontaining lipoproteins.15
This suggests that increases in LgLpA-I cause a shift of LCAT from
higher (MdLpA-I, SmLpA-I, and LpA-I/A-II) to lower (LgLpA-I)
Vmax particles that reduces the rate of cholesterol
esterification and vice versa. As a result, the relative amount of
LgLpA-I among HDL particles regulates the reactivity of HDL to LCAT.
The present results extend these findings to plasma levels.
The addition of LgLpA-I inhibits the rate of cholesterol
esterification mediated by Md and SmLpA-I in the presence of a
constant amount of LCAT (Fig 4
). Thus, it is reasonable to consider
that these data can explain the inverse correlation between the plasma
concentration of LgLpA-I and FERHDL or MERplasma. Since plasma
concentrations of LpA-I largely depend on those of LgLpA-I, the
inverse correlation between the plasma concentrations of LpA-I and
FERHDL or MERplasma can be explained similarly. Since LCAT associated
with LpA-I esterifies FC from VLDL and LDL,16
MERplasma must be affected by the plasma concentrations of VLDL and
LDL. Thus, the correlation between LgLpA-I and MERplasma
(r=-.41) ought to be weaker than that between LgLpA-I and
FERHDL (r=-.76).
Since cholesterol esterification of LpA-I particles is required for the efficient net removal of cellular cholesterol mediated by LpA-I,9 16 we next studied the effect of subclasses of LpA-I on net cholesterol efflux from foam cells. LpA-I can remove cellular cholesterol more efficiently than LpA-I/A-II. In the present study, we extended our previous findings9 to subspecies of LpA-I particles; (Md+Sm)LpA-I (the HDL3 fraction of LpA-I) had a greater ability to reduce cellular cholesterol than did LgLpA-I (the HDL2 fraction of LpA-I). This agrees with a report by Duverger et al11 that MdLpA-I is most effective in promoting cholesterol efflux from Ob 1771 cells. Furthermore, we found that LgLpA-I inhibits net cholesterol efflux from macrophage foam cells mediated by (Md+Sm)LpA-I. LpA-I cannot promote net cellular cholesterol efflux without LCAT activity.9 16 Thus, the effect of LgLpA-I on the rate of cholesterol esterification appears to contribute to the inhibitory effect of LgLpA-I on net cellular cholesterol efflux.
Since plasma concentrations of LpA-I are mainly determined by
those of LgLpA-I (Fig 2
), our data seem to indicate that LpA-I in
subjects with lower plasma concentrations of LpA-I can remove more
cellular cholesterol than that in subjects with higher plasma
concentrations of LpA-I. If so, our data are in sharp contrast to the
current concept of the antiatherogenic nature of LpA-I. In con-trast
to our interpretation, one may assume that (Md+Sm)LpA-I particles are
good acceptors for cellular cholesterol and that they remain so until
they become LgLpA-I particles. A higher concentration of plasma
LgLpA-I may represent the end product of very efficient
cellular cholesterol acceptance. However, we13 and
others14 have reported that the fractional catabolic rate
of LgLpA-I is much less than that of (Md+Sm)LpA-I, and no
precursor-product relation was found between the two
fractions.13 Thus, our interpretation seems to be more
likely. Llera Moya et al33 report that the serum
concentration of LpA-I is positively associated with the ability of
whole human serum to promote unidirectional cellular cholesterol efflux
but not with the cholesterol content of cells. These findings seem to
be consistent with the current concept of the antiatherogenic nature of
LpA-I. However, the distribution and nature of lipoproteins in plasma
are quite different from those in the interstitium. In addition, it
seems unlikely that unidirectional cellular cholesterol efflux with no
change of cellular cholesterol mass would contribute to the
antiatherogenic nature of LpA-I. Thus, the physiological significance
of the ability of whole serum to promote cellular cholesterol efflux
seems to be limited. According to studies of human arteries and
lymph, only small HDL particles (<10 nm in diameter) can enter the
interstitium.34 35 36 37 Since LgLpA-I particles (11.1 nm in
diameter) appear to be excluded from the interstitium, the net cellular
cholesterol efflux mediated by (Md+Sm)LpA-I may not be inhibited in
this compartment. However, plasma concentrations of (Md+Sm)LpA-I did
not correlate with those of LpA-I. In addition, LCAT activity in the
interstitium and that required for efficient cellular cholesterol
removal are lower than that in plasma,38 suggesting that
the cholesterol-reducing capacity of (Md+Sm)LpA-I in the interstitium
is lower than that in plasma. Therefore, it is unlikely that cellular
cholesterol reduction by (Md+Sm)LpA-I can account for the inverse
correlation between plasma concentrations of LpA-I and the risk of
coronary artery disease. Other smaller particles may be created from
LgLpA-I by remodeling.39 40 41 42 The lower fractional
catabolic rate of LgLpA-I [versus that of (Md+Sm)LpA-I] increases
the likelihood that LgLpA-I will be remodeled,13 14 and
as a result, the concentration of smaller particles may increase in the
interstitium as a function of the plasma concentrations of LgLpA-I.
However, we have reported that LpA-I and LpA-I/A-II particles in
patients with familial LCAT deficiency (the size and shape of these
particles are similar to those of remodeled HDL) possess only 30% to
40% of the cholesterol-reducing capacity of normal LpA-I and
LpA-I/A-II particles.43 44 Therefore, the net cholesterol
efflux from peripheral cells mediated by LpA-I in the interstitium may
be less than that expected based on studies using plasma LpA-I. The
cholesterol-reducing capacity of LpA-I in the interstitium may not
depend on the plasma concentrations of LpA-I.
Dobiasova et al20 report significant increases in FERHDL in subjects with coronary artery disease. We recently confirmed this finding in Japanese patients (K. Saku and T. Ohta, unpublished data, 1994). Thus, regulation of the reactivity of apoA-Icontaining lipoproteins to LCAT by LgLpA-I can partly explain the antiatherogenic nature of plasma LpA-I.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 17, 1995; accepted April 4, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. D. Wool, C. A. Reardon, and G. S. Getz Apolipoprotein A-I mimetic peptide helix number and helix linker influence potentially anti-atherogenic properties J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1268 - 1283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kontush, P. Therond, A. Zerrad, M. Couturier, A. Negre-Salvayre, J. A. de Souza, S. Chantepie, and M. J. Chapman Preferential Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Enrichment and Sphingomyelin Depletion Are Key Features of Small Dense HDL3 Particles: Relevance to Antiapoptotic and Antioxidative Activities Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(8): 1843 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kontush and M. J. Chapman Functionally Defective High-Density Lipoprotein: A New Therapeutic Target at the Crossroads of Dyslipidemia, Inflammation, and Atherosclerosis Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 342 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kontush, E. C. de Faria, S. Chantepie, and M. J. Chapman Antioxidative Activity of HDL Particle Subspecies Is Impaired in Hyperalphalipoproteinemia: Relevance of Enzymatic and Physicochemical Properties Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2004; 24(3): 526 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Miida, O. Miyazaki, Y. Nakamura, S. Hirayama, O. Hanyu, I. Fukamachi, and M. Okada Analytical performance of a sandwich enzyme immunoassay for pre{beta}1-HDL in stabilized plasma J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 645 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dobiásová, L. Adler, T. Ohta, and J. Frohlich Effect of labeling of plasma lipoproteins with [3H]cholesterol on values of esterification rate of cholesterol in apolipoprotein B-depleted plasma J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2000; 41(8): 1356 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Saku, B. Zhang, T. Ohta, and K. Arakawa Quantity and function of high density lipoprotein as an indicator of coronary atherosclerosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 436 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fournier, J.-L. Paul, V. Atger, A. Cogny, T. Soni, M. de la Llera-Moya, G. Rothblat, and N. Moatti HDL Phospholipid Content and Composition as a Major Factor Determining Cholesterol Efflux Capacity From Fu5AH Cells to Human Serum Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 1997; 17(11): 2685 - 2691. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tilly-Kiesi, A. H. Lichtenstein, J. M. Ordovas, G. Dolnikowski, R. Malmstrom, M.-R. Taskinen, and E. J. Schaefer Subjects With ApoA-I(Lys107->0) Exhibit Enhanced Fractional Catabolic Rate of ApoA-I in Lp(AI) and ApoA-II in Lp(AI With AII) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 1997; 17(5): 873 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |