Articles |
From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Ö.S., U.E.), Uppsala University, Uppsala; the Center of General Medicine (J.J.), Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm; the Department of Internal Medicine (J.M., A.G.O.), Linköping University, Linköping; and the King Gustaf V Research Institute (G.W.), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Correspondence to Örjan Smedby, Dr Med Sci, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: atherosclerosis, pathogenesis roughness curvature shear rate flow separation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An explanation for these findings in fluid mechanical terms was offered by the hypothesis advanced by Caro et al.6 They postulated that low shear stress, which tends to occur along the inner curvature of a curved vessel, promotes the development of atheroma. Evidence in support of this theory has been provided by coronary angiography studies7 8 and ultrasound experiments in canine coronary arteries.9 A related theory implicates zones with separated flow (local backflow adjacent to the vessel wall), which also tend to arise along the inner curvature of curved tubes.10 Flow experiments with laser Doppler velocimetry, when correlated with histopathology, have demonstrated a spatial covariation of atheromatous plaques with both low shear rates and reverse flow.11 12 As explanations of these observations, the role of monocyte invasion into the intima and shear-dependent gene regulation have been discussed.13 14 A possibly relevant related observation is the enhanced adhesion of monocytes that has been demonstrated in regions of low shear.15
Back et al16 17 have carried out visualization flow experiments in glass models with geometries derived from femoral arteriograms. Flow separation or helical secondary flow was found to occur along the inner curvature, where atherosclerotic lesions would be most prominent. This was true both for a vessel with almost constant curvature and in the presence of a reverse curvature that gave the vessel a slight S shape.
Numerical computation has also been used to evaluate the effect of curvature on arterial fluid mechanics.18 19 These studies confirm the presence of lower wall shear and helical secondary flow adjacent to the inner curvature in the curved coronary arteries.
We have developed a technique for the detection of flow separation with digitized cineangiography.20 In a model study, good agreement was found with laser Doppler velocimetryproven separated flow, and when applied to a clinical material the method revealed an increased frequency of similar flow disturbances along the inner curvature of the femoral artery.21
Visual observations of individual angiography films can provide
examples supporting the idea that inner curves are at higher risk for
developing atherosclerotic lesions than are outer curves (Fig 1
). However, such observations will inevitably be quite
subjective and can hardly be regarded as convincing evidence for a
relation between flow phenomena and atherogenesis.
|
Computer-analyzed angiography is an alternative method that yields quantitative measurements of atherosclerosis in vivo and has been used both by our group and others. Edge roughness, a measure that has been used in several studies to quantify atherosclerosis from digitized angiograms,21 22 23 correlates with both clinical symptoms of vascular disease and arterial cholesterol content.22 24
The aim of our present study was to undertake, in a larger clinical sample than has been used hitherto, a quantitative angiographic analysis of early atherosclerosis in the femoral artery that would compare the extent of lesions in the inner and outer curvatures of the curved vessel. Such a comparison is likely to reveal whether a causal relation exists between the disturbed flow in a curved artery and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The details of the angiography and digitization procedures are available.23 In brief, standard angiographic technique was used, after which the films were digitized and analyzed in an image-processing workstation (Imtec Epsilon, Imtec AB). For each patient, two femoral angiography series 10 minutes apart were obtained. Four consecutive 5-cm-long segments were digitized so that the superficial femoral artery was available for study within a 20-cm portion of the thigh.
The edges and midline of the vessel were detected.23 From
the midline coordinates, the curvature
, which equals the inverse of
the radius of the curvature but is endowed with a sign indicating the
direction of curvature (Fig 2
), was computed for each
pixel (every 114 µm).21 In this computation, smoothing
of the midline was accomplished by applying a 15-element filter 80
times (the filtering scheme found most useful in our previous study),
after which the value of
was obtained from first- and second-order
difference quotients.21
|
The amount of atherosclerosis was assessed as edge
roughness.22 23 To compute this measure, two versions of
the edge are compared, one slightly filtered and one strongly filtered
(Fig 3
). Roughness is defined as the root mean square
distance between these filtered edges. More specifically, if the
coordinates of the two filtered curves are denoted by f and
g, then the edge roughness (Ro) is given by the
formula
![]() | (1) |
|
where n is the number of pixels. Normally, this aggregation is extended over both edges of an arterial segment, but the same definition can be applied to each edge separately and to continuous or discontinuous subsegments.
When inner and outer curves were to be compared, the vessel was
classified in each pixel as being straight or curved by comparing the
local value of
with a threshold value. In this study, we used a
threshold value of 0.01 cm-1 (corresponding to a radius of
100 cm), but the calculations were repeated with thresholds of 0.02
cm-1 and 0.05 cm-1. In pixels in which the
vessel was curved, ie, |
|>0.01 cm-1, the
sign of
was used to determine the direction of curvature and to
identify the inner and outer curvatures. To compute Ro for
inner curves, Equation 1
was used with the sum extending over the inner
curvature of all curved segments, and correspondingly for outer curves.
For a roughness value for straight segments, both edges were included
in the summation.
An alternative analysis was also made that compared the lateral and
medial edges of the artery. This was achieved by simply applying
Equation 1
to each edge separately.
Comparisons between inner curves, outer curves, and straight segments as well as between lateral and medial edges were made by using ANOVA, taking into account the two measurements available for each patient (a repeated-measures model with two within-subject factors). The relation with age was studied with simple linear regression for inner and outer curves separately. Appropriate linear models were used to relate the difference between inner and outer curves to clinical and other data. When roughness differences were related simultaneously to several clinical and chemical variables, each variable was tested separately while correcting for all remaining independent variables. All calculations were performed on SUPERANOVA (Abacus Concepts). The criterion for significance was P<.01.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The lengths of curved and straight vessel segments are given in Table 1
. Using our definitions, the curved segments make up
about five-sixths of the analyzed part of the femoral artery and have
an average length of 24 mm each.
|
When inner curves, outer curves, and straight segments were compared
(Table 2
), the inner curves had significantly higher
edge roughness than the outer curves, and both inner and outer curves
had significantly higher values than the straight segments. When
roughness values were computed for each edge separately, there was no
significant difference between the lateral and medial side of the
artery (Table 3
). Although edge roughness increases with
age for both inner and outer curves (Fig 4
), this age
dependence is stronger for the inner curves, so that the difference
between inner and outer curves also tends to increase with age.
|
|
|
The same analysis shown in Table 2
was repeated for the subgroup of
patients having, in both series, no more than one inflection point in
the studied arterial segment (Table 4
). Significantly
higher values were again found for inner curves, whereas the difference
between outer curves and straight segments was no longer
significant.
|
The same basic pattern as in the total population was encountered when
subgroups with more severe hyperlipidemia, ie, with a total cholesterol
exceeding 10 mmol/L or total triglycerides exceeding 2.5 mmol/L, were
studied (Table 4
). Similar results were also obtained for the male and
female subpopulations separately and for the subpopulations with
previously diagnosed hypertension and angina pectoris. In the smaller
group with segmental vasoconstriction27 the differences
were less pronounced and no longer significant.
When the presence of intermittent claudication was taken into account
(Fig 5
and Table 4
), it was found, as expected, that
patients with claudication had higher roughness values for both inner
and outer curves than those without this symptom. In addition, there
was a significant interaction, so that the difference between inner and
outer curves was also greater in the group with intermittent
claudication.
|
Finally, the difference between inner and outer curves was related simultaneously to blood lipid levels (total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and total triglycerides), sex, age, and the presence or absence of hypertension, claudication, and angina (not shown). The difference was found to be significantly higher with increased age, with high triglyceride levels, in men, and in the presence of claudication. After correction for the mean overall roughness value in each patient, the result was still significant for total triglycerides, sex, and claudication, indicating that variations in the degree of general atherosclerotic involvement could not account for the greater difference between inner and outer curves in the presence of these risk factors.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In principle, a disparity between inner and outer curves could be
explained by structural differences between the medial and lateral wall
of the vessel rather than by flow phenomena in view of the fact that
the curvature is normally directed away from the midline of the body in
the greater part of the femoral artery, so that inner curves and
lateral walls tend to coincide. However, such an explanation would
inevitably lead to similar or more pronounced differences in roughness
between the medial and lateral edges of the vessel (Table 3
). The
absence of a significant difference here tells strongly against this
hypothesis.
With our method, the angiographic midline is used to identify inner and
outer curves. An undesired consequence of this is that curvature
determined from the midline may, in certain cases, be the result of a
plaque encroaching from one side of the artery (Fig 6
).
In this case, the inner curve at the neck of the stenosis and possibly
the outer curves immediately proximal and distal to it would
represent severely diseased portions of the vessel. This means
that the computed curvature value for a point on the vessel midline may
be influenced by the degree of atherosclerosis in its surroundings. In
other words, the atherosclerosis and curvature measures may, to a
certain extent, measure the same features of the vessel, which would
make the demonstrated correlations less informative. In some patients
with numerous inflection points, such an explanation seems plausible
when the angiogram is studied visually. In other patients, numerous
inflection points are found even in a quite normal vessel segment.
However, when a plaque gives rise to a curved vessel midline, this will
normally result in two inflection points (Fig 6
). The fact that a
significant difference between inner and outer curves was also found in
the much smaller subgroup with no more than one inflection point (Table 4
) indicates that curvature secondary to intrusion of plaques, which
may contribute to our findings, is not a sufficient explanation.
|
Thus we are left with fluid mechanical phenomena as the most plausible explanation for the differences in atherosclerosis severity between inner and outer curves. The results of the present study agree with theories linking atherogenesis to low shear stress and separated flow.6 10 15 Our study with digitized cineangiography demonstrated that flow disturbances such as flow separation are frequent in the femoral artery, especially in the inner curvature.21 It is more difficult, however, to distinguish the effects of separated flow from those of lower shear rates, as both these phenomena are expected to occur in the same locations. Indeed, any attempt to separate the effect of several related features of arterial flow will encounter great problems due to the high correlations between them.29
An interesting and somewhat unexpected finding was the fact that outer walls proved more diseased than straight segments. The asymmetrical velocity profile in a curved tube should give rise to higher shear rates in the outer curvature than in a corresponding straight tube.28 On the other hand, helical secondary flow may result in greater variability in the direction of the velocity vector close to the outer wall than in a straight vessel. This could conceivably favor the development of atherosclerosis.12 An alternative and perhaps more likely explanation is that a plaque originating from the inner curve grows in a circumferential manner, eventually involving the outer curvature as well.30
Both increasing age and triglyceride levels and presence of
intermittent claudication increased the difference between inner and
outer curves (Figs 4
and 5
). This may reflect the comparatively healthy
state of our population24 ; as long as there are only
incipient changes, hardly any differences are expected to be found
between the walls, but as the lesions evolve they will occur earlier on
the side at greatest risk. However, the significant relations
persisting after correction for overall roughness value indicate that
this is not a sufficient explanation. At any rate, we do not know
whether equal, larger, or smaller differences might be found at a later
stage of the disease.
Some choices in the methodology of this study were inevitably, to a
degree, arbitrary; eg, the definition of curved versus straight
segments depends heavily on the curvature limit (in this case 0.01
cm-1) as well as on the filtering algorithm. A curvature
of 0.01 cm-1, corresponding to a radius of 100 cm,
is a quite gentle curve, and its fluid mechanical importance is
questionable. The effects of curvature on the flow field in a curved
tube are often characterized by using the Dean
number17 :
![]() | (2) |
where Re denotes the Reynolds number (nondimensional flow rate) and rt is the tube radius. With a vessel diameter of 6 mm,23 a high-shear, whole-blood viscosity of about 4.5 mPa s,31 and a flow rate of 6.5 mL/s in the femoral artery,32 a curvature radius of 100 cm implies a Dean number of 17. However, Back et al17 studied secondary flow in a model of the femoral artery at Dean numbers of 10 through 100 and found unmistakable helical patterns even at the lowest Dean numbers. When our computations were repeated with higher curvature limits, the inner curves consistently had higher roughness values than the outer curves and straight segments. Thus, the outcome is independent of the definition of curvature limits.
As for the choice of filtering method, the 15-element filter applied 80 times yielded, in our earlier study,21 results most in agreement with our visual impression. If a weaker filtering scheme were to be used, the mean curve length would probably be shorter than the 24 mm used in the present study, and the results would probably be more closely related to minute irregularities of the vessel walls, with no substantial effect on the blood flow.
It should also be noted that atherosclerotic plaques, particularly in the early stages of the disease, can grow predominantly in the outward direction with only minor effects on the lumen.30 This fact may be a problem when estimation of the lumen volume is used to quantify atherosclerosis and is one reason to prefer edge roughness as an angiographic measure of atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, even with edge roughness we cannot exclude that the degree of atherosclerosis is in some cases underestimated due to such growth patterns or secondary remodeling and that this tendency may vary between inner and outer curves. This may, of course, bias our estimates of the difference in lesion severity between regions.
A limitation of the present study is the fact that a two-dimensional projection is used to study the three-dimensional course of the artery. Hence, curving in the sagittal direction, which may certainly influence the fluid dynamics of the vessel, is ignored. With access to two orthogonal angiographic projections it is theoretically possible to compute the three-dimensional curvature vector, but it is not immediately clear how a comparison of inner and outer curves should be performed in such a case.
We have considered the state of the artery on only one occasion. A possible extension of the present study would be to relate curvature to the development of atherosclerosis over time in a longitudinal study in which subpopulations differing in initial degree of atherosclerosis could be studied separately. This is one of our plans for future work with the PQRST material.
In conclusion, we have found that the inner curves of the femoral artery show a higher degree of atherosclerotic involvement than the outer curves and that both inner and outer curves are more affected than are straight segments. A plausible explanation is that low shear rates or separated flow promote the development of atherosclerosis along the inner curvature, from where the plaques grow circumferentially toward the outer curvature.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 15, 1994; accepted March 28, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. B. Wood, S. Z. Zhao, A. Zambanini, M. Jackson, W. Gedroyc, S. A. Thom, A. D. Hughes, and X. Y. Xu Curvature and tortuosity of the superficial femoral artery: a possible risk factor for peripheral arterial disease J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1412 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhu and M. H. Friedman Relationship Between the Dynamic Geometry and Wall Thickness of a Human Coronary Artery Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2003; 23(12): 2260 - 2265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Krams, J.J. Wentzel, J.A.F. Oomen, R. Vinke, J.C.H. Schuurbiers, P.J. de Feyter, P.W. Serruys, and C.J. Slager Evaluation of Endothelial Shear Stress and 3D Geometry as Factors Determining the Development of Atherosclerosis and Remodeling in Human Coronary Arteries in Vivo : Combining 3D Reconstruction from Angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) with Computational Fluid Dynamics Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 1997; 17(10): 2061 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
O. Smedby Do Plaques Grow Upstream or Downstream?: An Angiographic Study in the Femoral Artery Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 1997; 17(5): 912 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |