Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:367-376

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Philis-Tsimikas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Witztum, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Philis-Tsimikas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Witztum, J. L.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:367-376.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Aminoguanidine Has Both Pro-oxidant and Antioxidant Activity Toward LDL

Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Sampath Parthasarathy; Sylvie Picard; Wulf Palinski; Joseph L. Witztum

From the Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla.

Correspondence to Joseph L. Witztum, Department of Medicine 0682, Basic Science Bldg Rm 1080, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract We previously demonstrated that aminoguanidine (AMGN) was able to prevent oxidative modification of LDL. Initially, we thought that this occurred solely because AMGN trapped reactive breakdown products of lipid peroxidation and prevented apoB modification, similar to AMGN's proposed ability to trap reactive glucose intermediates and prevent advanced glycosylation end-product formation. We now demonstrate that AMGN also displays dose-dependent pro-oxidant and antioxidant activity toward LDL. Moderate doses of AMGN (0.05 to 1.0 mmol/L) prevented lipid peroxidation in LDL exposed to copper. AMGN prevented the loss of polyunsaturated fatty acids and delayed or prevented conjugated-diene formation, both of which are sensitive indicators of lipid peroxidation. The same doses of AMGN also prevented apoB modification, a step distal to lipid peroxidation, as evidenced by the ability to (1) prevent fluorescence at 420 nm, (2) block enhanced electrophoretic mobility, and (3) prevent changes leading to enhanced macrophage uptake. Thus, AMGN inhibits LDL modification both by inhibiting lipid peroxidation as well as by trapping reactive breakdown products of lipid peroxidation. It was also demonstrated that for every LDL, there was also a very low dose of AMGN (about 0.01 mmol/L) that actually promoted lipid oxidation and subsequent protein modification. This activity of AMGN could be enhanced by increasing the content of lipid hydroperoxide in the LDL, eg, by aging or radioiodinating the LDL. Conversely, the pro-oxidant activity could be reduced by pretreatment of LDL with ebselen or vitamin E. We propose a mechanism by which AMGN effects pro-oxidant activity toward LDL at very low concentrations and antioxidant activity at higher concentrations and discuss the practical implications of these observations.


Key Words: oxidized LDL • atherosclerosis • diabetes • aminoguanidine


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Aminoguanidine (AMGN) is a small, water-soluble compound that is currently being tested for its ability to prevent the formation of advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs). AGE is the term coined by Brownlee et al1 to describe the Maillard products that are formed when organic compounds are incubated with high concentrations of glucose for prolonged periods. For example, when proteins are exposed to high glucose concentrations, available free amino groups, such as the {varepsilon}-amino group of lysine, undergo nonenzymatic glycosylation to form readily reversible Schiff bases, which then undergo Amadori rearrangement to yield stable products. In turn, these undergo further complicated rearrangement reactions, in part, secondary to oxidative decomposition of Amadori products, to yield a variety of AGEs.1 2 3 4 Such AGEs lead to cross-linking of proteins and alterations in the structure and function of a wide variety of proteins.1 4 Evidence has been accumulating that many of the complications of hyperglycemia may be due to the formation of such AGEs. AMGN is a small, hydrazine compound structurally identical to the amino-terminal group of arginine. Because AMGN is such a strong nucleophile, it should preferentially bind aldehydes and other breakdown products of Amadori reactions. As originally shown by Brownlee and colleagues,5 AMGN can be used to block reactive intermediates of AGEs and consequently prevent AGE formation.1 6

Under oxidative stress, the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) of LDL undergo peroxidation reactions and subsequent decomposition to yield highly reactive aldehydes and other breakdown products (reviewed in References 7 and 87 8 ). In turn, these products modify the lysine residues of apoB, thereby creating the epitopes on oxidized LDL (Ox-LDL) that form the ligand(s) leading to enhanced uptake by one or more "scavenger" receptors on macrophages.9 By analogy to the protective effect of AMGN in inhibiting AGE formation, we previously reasoned that AMGN could also trap highly reactive aldehydes (and similar products) and thus prevent apoB modification and consequent macrophage uptake. Indeed, in a recent report, we demonstrated that AMGN was capable of preventing the protein modification of LDL that leads to macrophage uptake when LDL is oxidized, whether caused by copper or endothelial cells.10 Initially we thought that this inhibition was due solely to the ability of AMGN to trap reactive aldehyde intermediates, as noted above. From the structure of AMGN NH2 || NH2NHC=NH one would not predict that it had any direct "antioxidant" activity. Nevertheless, when LDL was oxidized by exposure to copper and conjugated-diene (CD) formation was measured, we were surprised to find that at concentrations of 5 to 10 mmol/L, CD formation was greatly inhibited,10 suggesting inhibition of lipid peroxidation. In addition, we noted that at very low doses of AMGN, the lag time until initiation of CD formation was actually shortened,10 suggesting an apparent promotion of lipid peroxidation.

The unexpected observation that AMGN appeared to inhibit lipid peroxidation when added at high concentrations but actually promote lipid peroxidation when used at low concentrations led to detailed studies of the pro-oxidant and antioxidant effects of AMGN on LDL described in this report. On the basis of these results, we propose a hypothesis that would explain the opposing effects of AMGN toward LDL.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
AMGN HCl (a gift from Dr Michael Yamin) was dissolved in distilled water. Vitamin E (D-{alpha}-tocopherol) (a gift from Henkel Corp) and ebselen (2-phenyl-1,2-benzoisoselenazol-3[2H]-one) (a gift from Ciba-Geigy) were diluted in 100% ethanol to the concentrations indicated in each experiment. Linoleic acid, soybean lipoxygenase (type V), superoxide dismutase, and cytochrome c (cyt c) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.

LDL Isolation
Plasma was obtained from healthy donors or hyperlipidemic patients who were not taking antioxidant supplements. Blood was collected into tubes containing EDTA (final concentration, 0.27 mmol/L), and final concentrations of 0.22 mmol/L gentamicin, 0.15 mmol/L chloramphenicol, 1 µmol/L D-phenylalanyl-L-propyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone, and 2 mmol/L benzamidine were added to plasma and all solutions during subsequent LDL isolation, as previously described.11 EDTA (0.27 mmol/L) was also present in all solutions throughout the LDL isolation and subsequent dialysis procedures. LDL samples isolated from individual donors were used for most experiments except as indicated. For these samples, plasma density was adjusted to d=1.19 g/mL with KBr, overlayered with d=1.006 g/mL solution, and spun in an SW41 rotor at 38 000 rpm for 40 hours at 7°C as described.12 A single LDL band was isolated and dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline with EDTA (0.27 mmol/L). In several experiments, LDL was isolated from pooled plasma by sequential ultracentrifugation as previously described.11 All samples were sterile-filtered, and protein content was determined by the method of Lowry et al.13 LDL was radioiodinated with 125I by the method of Salacsinski et al14 as described.11

Oxidation of LDL
For most of these experiments, oxidation was achieved by incubating LDL (100 µg protein per milliliter) with CuSO4 (5 µmol/L) for varying times in the absence or presence of AMGN and/or other reagents.15 In selected experiments, the LDL was dialyzed at 4°C for 20 hours against phosphate-buffered saline without EDTA just before use in oxidation experiments. In other cases, the EDTA content of the LDL samples was adjusted (by dilution) to 2 to 3 µmol/L before use in oxidation experiments.

Measurement of Extent of LDL Oxidation
Assays of Extent of Lipid Peroxidation
In these studies we did not measure thiobarbituric acid–reactive substances, a classic index of lipid peroxidation, because in the presence of AMGN, malondialdehyde (or related compounds) that form as a result of lipid decomposition react preferentially with AMGN instead of with thiobarbituric acid (see Reference 1010 ). Thus, we used the loss of unsaturated fatty acids in LDL as one sensitive index of lipid peroxidation16 and CD formation17 as another.

Fatty Acid Analysis. Fatty acids were extracted by a modification of the method of Folch et al.18 The fatty acids were transmethylated and the resulting methyl esters analyzed on a Varian gas chromatograph (model 3700) equipped with a column of 10% Silar 5CP on Gas Chrom QII, 100/200 mesh (Alltech Associates, Inc) as previously described.19 A C-15 internal standard was added to each sample before extraction, and calculation of absolute fatty acid content was determined for each LDL sample.19 Data are expressed as a percentage of total fatty acids analyzed.

CD Formation. CD formation was measured by the method of Esterbauer et al17 as previously described.20 LDL (100 µg/mL) was placed in cuvettes in phosphate-buffered saline, to which was added CuSO4 (5 µmol/L) in the presence or absence of AMGN and/or other reagents. CD formation was measured as absorbance at an optical density of 234 nm at 15-minute intervals in a continuous-recording spectrophotometer maintained at 30°C (Uvikon 810, Kontron).

Assays of Protein Modification
As a result of oxidation, the protein moiety of LDL is profoundly modified. This was monitored by (1) changes in mobility on agarose gel electrophoresis, (2) generation of fluorescent products, and (3) enhanced uptake of macrophages by scavenger receptors.

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis. Electrophoresis was performed on agarose gels (Universal Gel/8) supplied by Ciba Corning Diagnostic Corp and stained with fat red 2B as described.15

Generation of Fluorescent Products. Generation of fluorescent products was assayed with a continuously recording spectrofluorometer (model L550, Perkin-Elmer) as previously described.21 An excitation wavelength of 320 nm was used and results were recorded at emission wavelengths of 350 to 500 nm.

Macrophage Degradation. In previous experiments, we directly assayed the effects of AMGN for its ability to inhibit modification of LDL leading to enhanced macrophage uptake.10 In those experiments we used iodinated LDL samples, but as described in "Results," such iodinated LDL samples are already oxidized.22 Therefore, in these experiments we prepared an iodinated Ox-LDL sample and determined its rate of uptake by macrophages. We then indirectly tested the ability of various modified LDL preparations to compete with the 125I-Ox-LDL tracer for uptake and degradation by mouse peritoneal macrophages. 125I-Ox-LDL was prepared by incubating 125I-LDL with 5 µmol/L copper for 14 hours. Unlabeled LDL samples to be used as competitors were incubated with copper for 14 hours in the absence or presence of varying doses of AMGN. Resident mouse peritoneal macrophages were prepared as described.15 125I-Ox-LDL (2.5 µg) was incubated with macrophages (5 to 8x105 cells in 0.6 mL of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium) for 5 hours at 37°C in the absence or presence of 25 µg of unlabeled competitor (either native LDL or LDL oxidized in the absence or presence of AMGN). The extent of degradation of the 125I-Ox-LDL tracer was determined as described.15 19

Measurement of Superoxide Anion Generation
To test the ability of AMGN to generate a superoxide anion–like free radical from fatty acid hydroperoxide, we incubated AMGN with linoleoyl hydroperoxide as the substrate and tested the products' ability to reduce cyt c. Peroxidation of linoleic acid (1 mmol/L) was performed by incubation with soybean lipoxygenase (type V, 1500 U) in phosphate-buffered solution for 30 minutes as described.21 Completion of reactions was monitored by recording the optical density at 234 nm. Lipid hydroperoxide (LOOH, 250 nmol) was then combined with cyt c (0.58 mg) in the absence or presence of increasing doses of AMGN. The resultant reduction of cyt c was measured spectrophotometrically (Spectronic 1201) by recording the change in absorbance at 549 nm as measured at 15-second intervals for a total of 180 seconds. To document the presence of a superoxide anion–like compound as being responsible for the reduction of cyt c, superoxide dismutase was added in some experiments.21


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Evidence That AMGN Inhibits Lipid Peroxidation of LDL
Loss of PUFAs is a sensitive indicator of LDL lipid peroxidation. As shown in Table 1Down, when a freshly isolated LDL preparation was exposed to copper for 5 hours under the conditions used, the linoleic and arachidonic fatty acid contents were reduced, from 39% and 7.5% of total LDL fatty acids, respectively, to 10% and 0%. However, when 0.05 or 0.1 mmol/L AMGN was present during the pro-oxidant stimulus, there was near-total preservation of the linoleic and arachidonic fatty acid content.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Fatty Acid Content of LDL Exposed to Oxidizing Conditions in the Absence or Presence of Aminoguanidine (AMGN)

We next reexamined the ability of AMGN to prevent CD formation when LDL was exposed to copper by using many different LDL preparations. A representative experiment is shown in Fig 1Down. Note that when this LDL preparation was exposed to copper in the absence of AMGN, there was a lag phase of approximately 120 minutes until initiation of the rapid propagation phase, as measured by CD formation. However, when as little as 0.1 mmol/L AMGN was present, no rapid propagation phase was seen, even after 16 hours. This degree of antioxidant protection is similar to that seen with the classic antioxidant probucol.23 Note, however, that when a very low concentration (0.01 mmol/L) of AMGN was used in the presence of copper, the lag phase was actually shortened, suggesting enhancement of lipid peroxidation. In separate control experiments, addition of AMGN to LDL—in the absence of copper—did not cause any rise in CD formation (data not shown). When many different LDL preparations were studied, we saw a similar pattern. However, the absolute amounts of AMGN needed to provide complete protection (or propagation, at low doses) varied with different LDL preparations. We noted that LDL samples for which low doses of AMGN were very effective in preventing CD formation were those that were used immediately after isolation, whereas "older" LDL preparations required larger doses for similar degrees of protection. A dramatic and exaggerated example of this phenomenon is shown in Fig 2Down, in which the same LDL sample was tested in a similar manner 6, 11, and 93 days after isolation and storage in the dark in EDTA. Presumably, the hydroperoxide content of LDL increased as the LDL "aged," and the presence of preexisting hydroperoxides in the LDL affected its response to the added AMGN.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Conjugated-diene formation of LDL (100 µg/mL) exposed to 5 µmol/L copper in the absence or presence of indicated doses of aminoguanidine (AMGN). Separate aliquots of a single LDL preparation were added to individual cuvettes, to which 5 µmol/L copper and the indicated concentrations of AMGN were added. The absorbance (OD=optical density units at 234 nm) was continuously recorded with a Uvikon spectrophotometer at 15-minute intervals over a 14-hour time course. Values shown in the figure are concentrations of AMGN (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, or 10 mmol/L).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Conjugated-diene formation during copper-mediated oxidation of the same pooled LDL sample repeated at indicated times after isolation. After isolation the LDL sample was stored at 4°C in the presence of 0.27 mmol/L EDTA for the indicated times. Then an aliquot of the LDL was diluted to 100 µg/mL (EDTA concentration, 2.19 µmol/L) and exposed to copper (5 µmol/L) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of aminoguanidine (AMGN). The absorbance (OD=optical density units at 234 nm) was measured at 15-minute intervals. Values shown in the figure are concentrations of AMGN (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 mmol/L).

To further test this idea, we divided a freshly isolated LDL sample into six aliquots, some of which were "preoxidized" with copper for varying periods before the addition of 1 mmol/L AMGN. We then analyzed these preparations for CD formation (Fig 3Down). Note that the aliquots preoxidized for 0 or 30 minutes (those that presumably had the fewest LOOHs) were fully protected from oxidation by the dose of AMGN used, whereas those aliquots preoxidized for 60, 90, or 120 minutes had lag times much shorter than controls. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the concentration of AMGN required to protect a given LDL preparation is proportional to the preexisting concentrations of LOOHs.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of prior oxidation of LDL on conjugated-diene formation in the presence of aminoguanidine (AMGN). A single LDL sample was divided into six aliquots (at 100 µg/mL) and each aliquot was then exposed to copper (5 µmol/L) to initiate oxidation for the indicated period of time before subsequent addition of AMGN (1 mmol/L). The absorbance (OD=optical density units at 234 nm) of each aliquot was then monitored at 15-minute intervals in a Uvikon spectrophotometer.

Effects of AMGN on ApoB Modification
If lipid peroxidation is inhibited, then the subsequent modification of apoB should not occur. Modification of apoB can be monitored by the appearance of fluorescence at an emission wavelength of approximately 420 nm.16 24 Fig 4Down shows the emission fluorescence pattern for aliquots of freshly prepared LDL after 14 hours of exposure to copper in the presence or absence of increasing amounts of AMGN. Immediately after addition of copper (t=0), there was no fluorescence peak detected in either the presence or absence of AMGN (data not shown). However, after 14-hour exposure to copper, there was a large fluorescence peak at 420 nm characteristic of Ox-LDL. As little as 0.1 mmol/L AMGN was able to completely inhibit protein modification. However, at very low concentrations of AMGN (0.01 mmol/L), there actually was enhancement of emission. These data suggest that low doses, such as 0.1 and certainly 1 mmol/L, ought to totally inhibit protein modification and subsequent macrophage uptake. However, in our previous studies it took 5 or even 10 mmol/L AMGN to prevent macrophage uptake of modified LDL.10 The reason for this discrepancy was suggested from other studies in our laboratory, which have recently demonstrated that iodination of LDL increases its susceptibility to oxidation by radiation-induced initiation of lipid peroxidation.22 Thus, iodinated LDL samples would have greater amounts of endogenous hydroperoxides and would be predicted to require greater amounts of AMGN to prevent copper-induced modification.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Fluorescence generated by oxidation of LDL in the absence or presence of aminoguanidine (AMGN). Four aliquots of a single LDL sample (25 µg/mL) were exposed to copper (5 µmol/L) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of AMGN. At t=0, LDL in the presence of copper and at the indicated concentrations of AMGN failed to yield any fluorescence peak. The pattern of LDL after 14 hours of oxidation is demonstrated. Excitation wavelength was 350 nm. Emission wavelength was measured from 385 to 500 nm. A peak at 420 nm is characteristic for oxidized LDL. Values shown in the figure are concentrations of AMGN (0, 0.01, 0.1, or 1 mmol/L).

To test this hypothesis, we divided an LDL sample into two aliquots (Fig 5Down). Fig 5ADown shows CD formation in freshly isolated, noniodinated LDL and the ability of AMGN to inhibit lipid peroxidation. Note that with this preparation, as little as 0.1 mmol/L AMGN was highly effective in preventing CD formation, even on prolonged exposure to copper. The other LDL aliquot, which had previously been iodinated, was also exposed to copper under the same conditions as in Fig 5ADown. However, as shown in Fig 5BDown, even 10 mmol/L AMGN, while prolonging CD formation, did not totally prevent oxidation as it had with the noniodinated LDL sample. In fact, the concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 mmol/L AMGN, which had prevented oxidation of the nonradiolabeled LDL, actually promoted lipid peroxidation in this iodinated sample. A similar pattern was seen when another pair of LDL preparations were examined for appearance of fluorescence at 420 nm, indicative of protein modification. As shown in Fig 6Down, 1 mmol/L AMGN fully protected the noniodinated LDL preparation, whereas the 0.1 mmol/L dose promoted protein modification. However, for the iodinated LDL aliquot, all tested doses of AMGN enhanced protein modification and none of the tested doses prevented it (Fig 6Down).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Conjugated-diene (CD) formation of native and 125I-LDL exposed to copper in the presence of aminoguanidine (AMGN). A single LDL sample was divided into two aliquots, one of which was radioiodinated with 125I.22 The labeled LDL was used for this experiment 3 days after iodination. Unlabeled (A) and labeled (B) LDL samples (100 µg/mL) were incubated with copper (5 µmol/L) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of AMGN, and CD formation was measured spectrophotometrically (OD=optical density units at 234 nm). "Native" refers to LDL not exposed to copper. Values shown in the figure are concentrations of AMGN (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 mmol/L).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Fluorescence of native and 125I-LDL after exposure to copper in the presence of aminoguanidine (AMGN). In a protocol similar to that shown in Fig 5Up, a pair of unlabeled ({blacksquare}) and labeled ({square}) LDL preparations were also studied for development of fluorescence under identical copper-mediated conditions as described in the legend for Fig 5Up. Fluorescence at 420 nm was measured at hourly intervals (excitation wavelength was 350 nm). Values shown in the figure are concentrations of AMGN (0, 0.1, 1, or 10 mmol/L).

To further address the impact of iodination, we divided the same LDL preparation into two aliquots, one of which was iodinated. Then both aliquots were subjected to copper-mediated oxidation in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of AMGN, and their electrophoretic mobility on agarose gel electrophoresis was determined (Fig 7Down). Whereas as little as 0.1 mmol/L AMGN almost completely abolished the enhanced electrophoretic mobility (due to oxidation of noniodinated LDL), even 10 mmol/L AMGN could not completely prevent the enhanced migration of the 125I-LDL preparation exposed to copper.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Electrophoretic mobility of a pooled LDL sample after oxidation in the presence or absence of aminoguanidine (AMGN). The same unlabeled (left) and labeled (right) LDL preparations used in Figs 5Up and 6Up were exposed to copper (5 µmol/L) for 12 hours in the presence of the indicated concentrations of AMGN, and then agarose gel electrophoresis was performed. nLDL indicates native LDL (applied to gel directly from storage at 4°C); nLDL-i, native LDL incubated at 37°C for 12 hours in phosphate-buffered saline only.

In previous experiments, in which we used macrophage uptake of 125I-LDL after exposure to copper as an index of the ability of AMGN to protect LDL, we were unable to demonstrate protection unless concentrations as high as 10 or 25 mmol/L were used.10 To bypass the effect of oxidation produced by radiation from 125I, the macrophage degradation studies were repeated with 125I-Ox-LDL as a tracer, and the ability of unlabeled LDL preparations to compete for uptake was used as a measure of the extent of oxidation. Unlabeled LDL was oxidized by exposure to copper in the absence or presence of AMGN and then incubated with macrophages together with the 125I-Ox-LDL tracer. Using this protocol, we observed that much lower doses of AMGN prevented changes that led to enhanced macrophage uptake (Table 2Down). In this experiment, LDL oxidized in the absence of AMGN competed for 56% of the uptake of Ox-LDL tracer. However, when unlabeled LDL was oxidized in the presence of as little as 0.1 mmol/L AMGN, LDL was protected from oxidation and was unable to compete for uptake.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Degradation of 125I-Ox-LDL by Mouse Peritoneal Macrophages in the Presence of LDL Exposed to Copper in the Absence or Presence of AMGN

Potential Mechanisms by Which Low Doses of AMGN Promote Lipid Peroxidation
In the presence of copper, very low doses of AMGN result in the propagation of oxidation, especially when LDL with large numbers of preexisting hydroperoxides are used. As noted in greater detail in the "Discussion," we propose that such propagation may be due to a direct, nucleophilic attack by AMGN on the carbon containing an existing peroxy radical, with consequent release of a superoxide-like anion, which then acts on another PUFA to promote lipid peroxidation. To directly evaluate this possibility, we determined whether AMGN could cause the generation of superoxide-like radicals when incubated with linoleoyl hydroperoxide. Reduction of cyt c was used as an index of generation of superoxide-like anions. Linoleoyl hydroperoxide was added to cyt c in the absence or presence of various doses of AMGN, and reduction of cyt c was measured spectrophotometrically over 15-second intervals. To obtain measurable levels of superoxide-like radicals, 250 nmol of LOOH and higher concentrations of AMGN were needed. In the absence of AMGN, linoleoyl hydroperoxide did not result in reduction of cyt c. In contrast, in the presence of AMGN, reduction of cyt c occurred in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 8Down). In separate experiments, we demonstrated that cyt c reduction was inhibitable by increasing doses of superoxide dismutase (data not shown), suggesting that the product generated was a superoxide anion–like radical.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Bar graph showing generation of superoxide-like radicals from linoleoyl hydroperoxide in the presence of aminoguanidine (AMGN). Linoleoyl hydroperoxide (250 nmol/L) was added to cytochrome c (cyt c, 0.58 mg) in the absence or presence of the indicated doses of AMGN. Reduction of cyt c was measured as the maximal change in optical density (OD) at 549 nm, measured 180 seconds after addition of lipid hydroperoxide.

These data are compatible with the suggestion that AMGN is capable of initiating lipid peroxidation by nucleophilic displacement of peroxy radicals, generated from fatty acid hydroperoxides, to yield a superoxide anion–like radical capable of promoting lipid peroxidation (see the "Discussion" for further details of this hypothesis). If this is true, then removing or greatly diminishing the content of fatty acid hydroperoxides from LDL before adding AMGN should abolish the ability of AMGN to promote lipid peroxidation. Ebselen (2-phenyl-1,2-benzoisoselenazol-3[2H]-one) is a synthetic selenium-containing heterocyclic compound that can reduce fatty acid hydroperoxides to their corresponding (unreactive) alcohols, but ebselen does not act as a radical-scavenging antioxidant (at least at low doses).25 26 Thus, pretreatment of LDL with ebselen should reduce the content of peroxy radicals (derived from hydroperoxides) in LDL and diminish or prevent enhancement of lipid peroxidation produced by low doses of AMGN and copper. An "old" LDL preparation was selected for this experiment to enrich the LDL with preexisting hydroperoxides. A low dose of ebselen was selected (2.5 µmol/L) to minimize any possibility that it might act as a chain-breaking antioxidant (Fig 9Down, top). In separate experiments, we found that pretreatment of LDL with similar doses of ebselen alone (in the absence of reduced glutathione) reduced the content of LOOHs by 50% to 60% (M. Ezaki and J.L. Witztum, unpublished data, 1994), a finding similar to that in a recent report.27 Pretreatment of LDL for 15 minutes with 2.5 µmol/L ebselen prolonged the lag phase for CD formation by 40 minutes but did not prevent lipid peroxidation. With this LDL preparation, addition of AMGN in the absence of ebselen—at doses of either 0.1 or even 1.0 mmol/L—led to shortening of the lag time, consistent with the data shown earlier for older LDL preparations. However, when the LDL was pretreated with 2.5 µmol/L ebselen, not only was the enhanced oxidation noted previously with both doses of AMGN prevented but also the same doses of AMGN now completely prevented lipid peroxidation, even after 10 hours of exposure to copper.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Effect of aminoguanidine (ag) on conjugated-diene (CD) formation of LDL pretreated with ebselen (ebs) or incubated with 20 µmol/L vitamin E (E). An older LDL sample was divided into six aliquots (upper panel). Three aliquots were preincubated with ebs (2.5 µmol/L) for 15 minutes, and then all six aliquots were incubated with copper (5 µmol/L) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of ag. The same LDL preparation (100 µg/mL) used in the experiment shown in the upper panel was divided into five aliquots. Three LDL samples were enriched with E (20 µmol/L) before oxidation. Then all aliquots were incubated with copper (5 µmol/L) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of ag. CD formation (OD=optical density units at 234 nm) was measured at 15-minute intervals in both experiments. Values shown in the figure are concentrations of ag (0, 0.1, or 1 mmol/L).

If low doses of AMGN promote lipid peroxidation by generation of superoxide anion–like radicals, then addition of a free-radical scavenger like {alpha}-tocopherol should both block the pro-oxidant activity of low doses of AMGN and synergistically enhance the antioxidant activity of higher doses (Fig 9Up, bottom). In this experiment, the same older LDL preparation was used again, and 0.1 mmol/L AMGN again promoted lipid peroxidation. The addition of 20 µmol/L {alpha}-tocopherol alone delayed the lag time twofold, as expected,16 28 but did not prevent lipid peroxidation. However, combined use of 0.1 mmol/L AMGN and 20 µmol/L vitamin E completely prevented lipid peroxidation for as long as 16 hours.

Inherent Differences in Susceptibility to Oxidation of Different LDL
As demonstrated above, the degree of protection given by any particular dose of AMGN varied with different LDL preparations. We demonstrated that this was partly due to different degrees of ex vivo oxidation that had occurred due to differences in handling of the LDL preparation. To test the idea that some of this variability might also be due to different inherent susceptibility to oxidation of different LDL samples,8 29 we simultaneously prepared four different LDL preparations under identical conditions and subjected each to copper-mediated oxidation in the absence or presence of varying doses of AMGN (Fig 10Down). Note that the lag time of CD formation varied among individuals and in turn the ability of any given dose of AMGN to protect against or enhance lipid peroxidation also varied. Thus, the varying effects of AMGN depend both on the inherent susceptibility to oxidation of a given LDL sample as well as on changes that may occur ex vivo, such as those due to "aging" or iodination.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Conjugated-diene (CD) formation of four different LDL samples exposed to aminoguanidine (AMGN). LDL was simultaneously isolated from four individuals12 and handled under identical conditions. Each sample was diluted to 100 µg/mL and incubated with copper (5 µmol/L) in the presence of the indicated AMGN concentrations. CD formation (OD=optical density units at 234 nm) was measured at 15-minute intervals.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We previously suggested that AMGN might be useful in preventing oxidative modification of LDL.10 Our original suggestion was based on the idea that similar to the manner in which AMGN presumably traps reactive glucose intermediates during AGE formation and thus inhibits AGE formation,1 it would also bind aldehydes and other reactive breakdown products resulting from fatty acid peroxidation in LDL and prevent the covalent modification of apoB.7 8 Because such lipid-protein adducts are thought to form the epitopes on modified LDL that are recognized by the scavenger receptor of macrophages,8 30 AMGN could prevent the changes in Ox- LDL that lead to enhanced and unregulated macrophage uptake and foam cell formation. Indeed, we demonstrated that AMGN was capable of achieving this aim, whether oxidation of LDL was initiated by exposure to copper or to endothelial cells.10 Because of the structure of AMGN, we did not expect it to have any antioxidant activity. However, when tested for its ability to inhibit CD formation in LDL exposed to copper, we observed a prolongation of the lag time of CD formation when larger doses of AMGN were used, but paradoxically there was a shortening of the lag time when very low doses of AMGN were added.

In this article, we present multiple lines of evidence that AMGN does indeed display antioxidant activity toward LDL and prevents lipid peroxidation in LDL exposed to copper. Moderate concentrations of AMGN prevented the loss of PUFAs and delayed or prevented CD formation, both processes that are sensitive indicators of lipid peroxidation. (We did not retest the ability of AMGN to inhibit the formation of thiobarbituric acid–reactive substances, as the avidity of malondialdehyde for AMGN is so much greater than that for thiobarbituric acid that the assay cannot be used in the presence of AMGN.10 ) We demonstrated that LDL protein modification, a step distal to lipid peroxidation, was also inhibited by AMGN. This evidence included (1) the ability of AMGN to inhibit formation of fluorescence at 420 nm, typical for Ox-LDL; (2) the ability to prevent enhanced mobility on agarose gel electrophoresis; and (3) the ability to prevent changes leading to enhanced macrophage uptake. Additionally, AMGN inhibited the fragmentation of apoB that also occurs as a consequence of oxidative modification (data not shown). Thus, it is likely that AMGN inhibits apoB modification by both inhibiting lipid peroxidation per se as well as by trapping reactive breakdown products that result from lipid peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids.

For every LDL sample there appeared to be a given dose-response curve that described the ability of AMGN to protect against lipid peroxidation. For most LDL samples, concentrations of 0.1 to 1 mmol/L or greater were protective, but concentrations of 0.05 mmol/L were also protective for some. We also consistently noted that for any given LDL, there was a concentration of AMGN lower than that needed for protection that conversely promoted lipid peroxidation. In general, levels of 0.01 mmol/L fell into this category, but this dose appeared to depend on the preexisting state of oxidation of the LDL. Presumably, LDL containing increased levels of LOOHs were more susceptible to AMGN-induced enhancement of lipid peroxidation (and therefore, required even larger concentrations for antioxidant protection). Thus, LDL samples that were aged ex vivo or were iodinated22 required much larger doses of AMGN for protection and in turn, exhibited enhanced lipid peroxidation to lower doses of AMGN. However, some variability also appeared to be due to intrinsic differences in the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation (Fig 10Up). In fact, the differing profiles of enhancement of CD formation in the presence of low concentrations of AMGN (eg, 0.01 mmol/L) might be an extremely sensitive index of the endogenous context of LOOHs in a given LDL sample.

As noted above, the structure of AMGN does not resemble that of traditional antioxidants. In what way then does AMGN affect antioxidant activity at some concentrations and actually act as a pro-oxidant at lower concentrations? Although the reactions involved are likely to be very complex, we propose the following working hypothesis to explain these effects (Fig 11Down). Previously, we provided evidence to support the idea that reactive breakdown products of lipid peroxidation, such as malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal, form adducts with lysine residues of apoB.31 32 Work from our laboratory has also suggested an additional pathway by which peroxidized fatty acids can directly react with apoB lysine residues to generate the lipid-protein adducts that yield the fluorescent products found with LDL oxidation (Fig 11ADown). As proposed by Fruebis et al,21 there is a concerted reaction between the {varepsilon}-amino group of lysine and the carbon containing a peroxy radical in a modified PUFA. In this scheme, the {varepsilon}-amino group makes a nucleophilic attack, thereby liberating a protonated superoxide anion–like radical, (H)O2{bullet}- (also called a perhydroxyl radical33 ), from LOO{bullet}, which in turn propagates the lipid peroxidation reactions (eg, conversion of LH to LOO{bullet}). In a similar manner we propose that the much stronger nucleophile AMGN makes a concerted attack on a PUFA carbon containing a peroxy radical. This results in a transient (or possibly stable) AMGN–fatty acid adduct (Fig 11BDown) and subsequent liberation of an (H)O2{bullet}- radical (Fig 11BDown). In the presence of low concentrations of AMGN, the liberated radicals can proceed to promote lipid peroxidation.21 33 However, in the presence of a relative excess of AMGN, we propose that the radicals released from the initial nucleophilic displacement react with AMGN, possibly forming a nitrone-like compound that, in turn, could decompose to yield a variety of products, possibly including nitric oxide (Fig 11CDown). In support of this hypothesis we demonstrated the ability of AMGN to react with a fatty acid hydroperoxide to generate a superoxide anion–like radical capable of reducing cyt c. With older LDL preparations or iodinated LDL samples that may contain more endogenous peroxy radicals, much higher concentrations of AMGN were needed to inhibit lipid oxidation, probably because insufficient AMGN was available to react with the liberated superoxide-like radicals. (Conversely, higher doses of AMGN actually promoted lipid peroxidation.) Consistent with this hypothesis, pretreatment of LDL with ebselen, a compound that reduces LOOH content,25 27 abolished the ability of AMGN to promote lipid peroxidation. Furthermore, {alpha}-tocopherol, a potent chain-breaking free-radical scavenger, also prevented the pro-oxidant activity of AMGN and in fact acted synergistically to greatly augment AMGN's antioxidant activity (Fig 9Up, bottom). This likely occurred as vitamin E reduced the content of LOO{bullet}, and consequently fewer superoxide-like radicals were generated by AMGN. It is also possible that AMGN reduced the vitamin E radical in a manner similar to that for ascorbate.34 35 Whatever the exact mechanism(s) involved, the synergy between vitamin E and AMGN may have important therapeutic consequences.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. Proposed mechanism by which aminoguanidine (AMGN) acts as a pro-oxidant and antioxidant toward fatty acid hydroperoxides. See text for discussion. Panel A was adapted from Reference 21.

Obviously, the reactions involved in oxidation of LDL are complex and numerous, and it is possible that AMGN acts as an "antioxidant" by other mechanisms as well. However, our data suggest that AMGN is capable of inhibiting oxidative modification of LDL by at least two general mechanisms, one relating to its ability to trap reactive breakdown products of lipid peroxidation, such as aldehydes, and the other by its ability to act as an antioxidant.

After this manuscript was completed, Scaccini et al36 reported that 20 mmol/L AMGN was required to prevent oxidation of LDL, as measured by several different indices. This contrasts with the present data, which show that doses of 0.10 mmol/L or less completely inhibited lipid peroxidation for as long as 18 hours. We suspect that the reasons for the high doses of AMGN required by Scaccini et al were that the LDL they used was already oxidized to some extent and that many of their experiments used iodinated LDL.

AMGN is currently undergoing clinical trials in humans to test its safety and efficacy in inhibiting complications of AGE formation in diabetic subjects. Because AGE formation is widespread and occurs even in circulating LDL37 where it may promote oxidation, AMGN could have an important therapeutic impact. However, the data presented here suggest that AMGN has a bimodal effect on lipid peroxidation, at least for LDL, by promoting lipid peroxidation at low concentrations and inhibiting it at higher levels. In rabbits, plasma concentrations of 0.03 to 0.075 mmol/L AMGN can be achieved in vivo (W.P. et al, unpublished data). Because concentrations of 0.05 to 0.10 mmol/L AMGN are capable of inhibiting oxidation of most freshly isolated LDL, which most likely contains hydroperoxides generated at least partly ex vivo, it seems conceivable that AMGN might act as an antioxidant in vivo. However, the actual concentrations of AMGN in various tissues and microenvironments (as in the intima of the artery) where oxidation might occur are unknown. Thus, whether AMGN might have localized antioxidant or even pro-oxidant effects in vivo is unknown. The observation that vitamin E, a potent free-radical scavenger, greatly potentiated the antioxidant activity of AMGN and blocked its pro-oxidant activity (Fig 9Up, bottom) suggests that combination therapy with AMGN and vitamin E might provide potent, synergistic antioxidant activity in vivo. This may be particularly relevant, since AMGN has also been reported to inhibit catalase, as least in vitro.38 These data suggest that consideration should be given to the augmented intake of vitamin E (or other antioxidants) if AMGN therapy is to be used as a long-term therapeutic option in human subjects.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant HL-14197 (SCOR). S. Picard was supported by an International Lilly Fellowship, a Lavoisier Fellowship (French Government), and a fellowship of the International Institute Lipha for Medical Research. The authors thank Dr Masanori Ezaki for measuring LOOHs and Drs Daniel Steinberg, Peter Reaven, and Joachim Fruebis for helpful advice and discussion; Elizabeth Miller and Felicidad Almazan for expert technical assistance; and Lisa Gallo for assistance in preparation of this manuscript.

Received October 21, 1994; accepted December 16, 1994.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Brownlee M, Cerami A, Vlassara H. Advanced glycosylation end products in tissue and the biochemical basis of diabetic complications. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1315-1321. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Pongor S, Ulrich PC, Bencsath FA, Cerami A. Aging of proteins: isolation and identification of a fluorescent chromophore from the reaction of polypeptides with glucose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:2684-2688. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Njoroge FG, Monnier VM. The chemistry of the Maillard reaction under physiological conditions: a review. Prog Clin Biol Rev. 1989;304:85-107.
  4. Baynes JW. Role of oxidative stress in development of complications in diabetes. Diabetes. 1991;40:405-412. [Abstract]
  5. Brownlee M, Vlassara H, Kooney A, Cerami A. Aminoguanidine prevents diabetes-induced arterial wall protein cross-linking. Science. 1986;232:1629-1632. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Edelstein D, Brownlee M. Mechanistic studies of advanced glycosylation end product inhibition by aminoguanidine. Diabetes. 1992;41:26-29. [Abstract]
  7. Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Role of oxidized low density lipoprotein in atherogenesis. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1785-1792.
  8. Witztum JL. Role of oxidised low density lipoprotein in atherogenesis. Br Heart J. 1993;69:512-518. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Steinberg D, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Khoo JC, Witztum JL. Beyond cholesterol: modifications of low density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:915-924. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Picard S, Parthasarathy S, Fruebis J, Witztum JL. Aminoguanidine inhibits the oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein and the subsequent increase in uptake by macrophage scavenger receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:6876-6880. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Reaven PD, Khouw A, Beltz WF, Parthasarathy S, Witztum JL. Effect of dietary antioxidant combinations in humans: protection of low density lipoprotein by vitamin E but not by ß-carotene. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:590-600. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Reaven PD, Ferguson E, Navab M, Powell F. Susceptibility of human LDL to oxidative modification: effects of variations in ß-carotene concentration and oxygen tension. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1162-1169. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265-275. [Free Full Text]
  14. Salacsinski PR, McLean C, Sykes JE, Clement-Jones VV, Lowry PJ. Iodination of proteins, glycoproteins and peptides using a solid-phase oxidizing agent, 1,3,4,6 tetrachloro-3 alpha,6-alpha-diphenyl glycoluril (Iodogen). Anal Biochem. 1981;117:136-146. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Steinbrecher UP, Parthasarathy S, Leake DS, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Modification of low density lipoprotein by endothelial cells involves lipid peroxidation and degradation of low density lipoprotein phospholipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:3883-3887. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Esterbauer H, Gebicki J, Puhl H, Jürgens G. The role of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in oxidative modification of LDL. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992;13:341-382. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Esterbauer H, Striegl G, Puhl H, Rotheneder M. Continuous monitoring of in vitro oxidation of human low density lipoprotein. Free Radic Res Commun. 1989;6:67-75. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Folch J, Lees JM, Stanley GHS. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497-509. [Free Full Text]
  19. Reaven P, Parthasarathy S, Grasse B, Miller E, Steinberg D, Witztum JL. Effects of oleate rich and linoleate rich diets on the susceptibility of low density lipoprotein to oxidative modification in mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:668-676.
  20. Parthasarathy S, Khoo JC, Miller E, Barnett J, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Low density lipoprotein rich in oleic acid is protected against oxidative modification: implications for dietary prevention of atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:3894-3898. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Fruebis J, Parthasarathy S, Steinberg D. Evidence for a concerted reaction between lipid hydroperoxides and polypeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:10588-10592. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Khouw AS, Parthasarathy S, Witztum JL. Radioiodination of low density lipoprotein initiates lipid peroxidation: protection by use of antioxidants. J Lipid Res. 1993;34:1483-1496. [Abstract]
  23. Parthasarathy S, Young SG, Witztum JL, Pittman RC, Steinberg D. Probucol inhibits oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:641-644.
  24. Steinbrecher UP. Oxidation of human low density lipoprotein results in derivatization of lysine residues of apolipoprotein B by lipid peroxide decomposition products. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:3603-3608. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Noguchi N, Yoshida V, Kaneda H, Yamamoto Y, Niki E. Action of ebselen as an antioxidant against lipid peroxidation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992;44:39-44. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Thomas CE, Jackson RL. Lipid hydroperoxide involvement in copper-dependent and independent oxidation of low density lipoproteins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991;256:1182-1188. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sattler W, Maiorino M, Stocker R. Reduction of HDL- and LDL-associated cholesterylester and phospholipid hydroperoxides by phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase and Ebselen (PZ 51). Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994;309:214-221. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Reaven PD, Witztum JL. Comparison of supplementation of RRR-{alpha}-tocopherol and racemic {alpha}-tocopherol in humans. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:601-608. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Jialal I, Freeman DA, Grundy SM. Varying susceptibility of different low density lipoproteins to oxidative modification. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:482-488. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Parthasarathy S, Fong LG, Otero D, Steinberg D. Recognition of resolubilized apoproteins from delipidated, oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein (LDL) by the acetyl-LDL receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:537-540. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Steinbrecher UP, Witztum JL, Parthasarathy S, Steinberg D. Decrease in reactive amino groups during oxidation or endothelial cell modification of LDL: correlation with changes in receptor-mediated catabolism. Arteriosclerosis. 1987;7:135-143. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Palinski W, Ylä-Herttuala S, Rosenfeld ME, Butler S, Socher SA, Parthasarathy S, Curtiss LK, Witztum JL. Antisera and monoclonal antibodies specific for epitopes generated during the oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:325-335. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Aikens J, Dix TA. Perhydroxyl radical (HOO·) initiated lipid peroxidation: the role of fatty acid hydroperoxides. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:15091-15098. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kagan VE, Serbinova EA, Forte T, Scita G, Packer L. Recycling of vitamin E in human low density lipoproteins. J Lipid Res. 1992; 33:385-397.
  35. Jialal I, Grundy SM. Preservation of the endogenous antioxidants in low density lipoproteins by ascorbate but not probucol during oxidative modification. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:597-601.
  36. Scaccini C, Chiesa G, Jialal I. A critical assessment of the effects of aminoguanidine and ascorbate on the oxidative modification of LDL: evidence for interference with some assays of lipoprotein oxidation by aminoguanidine. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:1085-1092.[Abstract]
  37. Bucala R, Makita Z, Koschinsky T, Cerami A, Vlassara H. Lipid advanced glycosylation: pathway for lipid oxidation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:6434-6438. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Ou P, Wolff SP. Aminoguanidine: a drug proposed for prophylaxis in diabetes inhibits catalase and generates hydrogen peroxide in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol. 1993;46:1139-1144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
R. A. Patterson, E. T. M. Horsley, and D. S. Leake
Prooxidant and antioxidant properties of human serum ultrafiltrates toward LDL: important role of uric acid
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 512 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
A. Stitt, T. A. Gardiner, N. L. Anderson, P. Canning, N. Frizzell, N. Duffy, C. Boyle, A. S. Januszewski, M. Chachich, J. W. Baynes, et al.
The AGE Inhibitor Pyridoxamine Inhibits Development of Retinopathy in Experimental Diabetes
Diabetes, September 1, 2002; 51(9): 2826 - 2832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Exner, M. Hermann, R. Hofbauer, S. Kapiotis, P. Quehenberger, W. Speiser, I. Held, and B. M.K Gmeiner
Semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase catalyzes endothelial cell-mediated low density lipoprotein oxidation
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2001; 50(3): 583 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
G. F. Wu, L. Pewe, and S. Perlman
Coronavirus-Induced Demyelination Occurs in the Absence of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase
J. Virol., August 15, 2000; 74(16): 7683 - 7686.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. J. Lyons, W. Li, B. Wojciechowski, M. C. Wells–Knecht, K. J. Wells–Knecht, and A. J. Jenkins
Aminoguanidine and the Effects of Modified LDL on Cultured Retinal Capillary Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2000; 41(5): 1176 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Zhang, S. Ren, D. Sun, and G. X. Shen
Influence of Glycation on LDL-Induced Generation of Fibrinolytic Regulators in Vascular Endothelial Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 1998; 18(7): 1140 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.-X. Fu, J.ús R. Requena, A. J. Jenkins, T. J. Lyons, J. W. Baynes, and S. R. Thorpe
The Advanced Glycation End Product, N[IMAGE]-(Carboxymethyl)lysine, Is a Product of both Lipid Peroxidation and Glycoxidation Reactions
J. Biol. Chem., April 26, 1996; 271(17): 9982 - 9986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow <