Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:2234-2240

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moriwaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moriwaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:2234-2240.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Functional and Anatomic Evaluation of Carotid Atherothrombosis

A Combined Study of Indium 111 Platelet Scintigraphy and B-Mode Ultrasonography

Hiroshi Moriwaki; Masayasu Matsumoto; Nobuo Handa; Yoshinari Isaka; Kazuo Hashikawa; Naohiko Oku; Masaichi Nakamura; Takenobu Kamada; Tsunehiko Nishimura

From the Division of Nuclear Medicine (H.M., K.H., N.O.), the First Department of Internal Medicine (M.M., N.H., Y.I., T.K.), the Department of Neurology (M.M., M.N.), and the Department of Tracer Kinetics (T.N.), Osaka University Medical School, Suita, Japan.

Correspondence to Hiroshi Moriwaki, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka University Medical School, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita 565, Japan.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract We examined the relation between in vivo thrombogenicity and the morphology of carotid lesions to clarify the role of platelet deposition in carotid atherothrombosis. We evaluated 60 subjects (120 carotid bifurcations) who had at least one established risk factor for atherosclerosis by using indium 111 platelet scintigraphy and high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography. We evaluated platelet accumulation in the carotid arterial wall by means of a dual-tracer method that used In 111–labeled platelets and technetium 99m–labeled human serum albumin. The tracer accumulation was assessed both visually and semiquantitatively by using the platelet accumulation index, ie, the ratio of radioactivity of the amount of In 111–labeled platelets deposited on the vascular wall to the amount of radioactivity in labeled platelets circulating in the blood pool. The morphology of the carotid lesions was analyzed with B-mode ultrasonography in terms of the presence of ulceration, the maximum percent stenosis, the echogenicity of plaque, and the plaque score, which indicates the severity of systemic atherosclerosis. Platelet accumulation increased with increase in plaque score (P<.01), and the magnitude of platelet accumulation was significantly greater in lesions with ulceration than in those without (P<.05). The platelet accumulation index in vessels with plaque showed a very weak but significant correlation with maximum percent stenosis (r=.28, P<.05) and a stronger correlation with the unilateral plaque score (r=.42, P<.0001). Analysis of the echogenicity of plaque showed that heterogeneous plaque had a high frequency of accumulating platelets. Platelet accumulation was related to the surface characteristics and severity of carotid lesions, especially in the presence of ulceration.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • platelet imaging • indium 111 • ultrasonography • carotid artery diseases


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Extracranial carotid atherosclerosis is a major cause of ischemic CVD.1 2 3 Although CAG is the "gold standard" for morphological evaluation of carotid lesions, it is invasive, and its use is restricted to preselected patients. With advances in US techniques, high-resolution B-mode US has emerged as one of the best modalities for visualization of the carotid artery. B-mode US provides real-time information about the characteristics of the lumen and the vessel wall, and because it is noninvasive, it can be used for screening and/or crossover studies.2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Clinically, it is important to differentiate unstable carotid plaques with platelet deposition, which may produce symptoms, from stable plaques.20 Indium 111 (In 111)–labeled PSC is a useful and noninvasive technique for investigation of the in vivo platelet deposition of carotid atherosclerotic lesions.21 22 23 24 25 26 By using a dual-radiotracer method with In 111–labeled platelets and technetium 99m–labeled human serum albumin, we semiquantitatively evaluated thrombus formation27 28 29 and the effect of antithrombotic therapy on platelet deposition.28 29

Several studies have compared platelet deposition and morphological evaluation of carotid lesions,21 22 23 24 25 26 27 30 but most of them21 22 23 24 27 have evaluated carotid lesions by using the invasive CAG method. To our knowledge, there have been only a few studies25 30 that have compared PSC and B-mode imaging for evaluation of carotid lesions. Although these studies are valuable, they used only echogenicity in their B-mode imaging,25 30 included patients who were under antiplatelet therapy,30 or had a small number of subjects.25

We selected patients who were not receiving antithrombotic medication to exclude the influence of these drugs. By means of the noninvasive B-mode technique, we evaluated carotid morphology minutely by using the following four parameters in relation to the accumulation of plaques on the carotid artery: the plaque score, which indicates the severity of systemic atherosclerosis; the presence or absence of ulceration; the degree of maximum percent stenosis; and the echogenicity of plaque. Furthermore, we evaluated whether there were differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups in the US parameters and platelet accumulation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
We recruited 52 men and 8 women (age, 60.3±8.2 years) from among inpatients and outpatients at the First Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka University Medical School Hospital, who had at least one established risk factor for atherosclerosis (ie, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity, or cigarette smoking). Of these 60 patients, 22 were without CVD. The remaining 38 had ischemic CVD referable to the carotid system31 ; of these, 10 had experienced transient ischemic attacks and 28 had a history of brain infarction. Patients were excluded if they were neurologically unstable or had cardioembolic risk factors such as atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, or myocardial infarction. Antiplatelet medication or anticoagulant medication was given to 30 of the 38 CVD patients and 5 of the 22 non-CVD patients initially, but all patients gave informed consent and stopped receiving any anticoagulant or platelet-active drugs (ie, warfarin, aspirin, ticlopidine, dipyridamole, heparin, or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) during the 3 weeks that preceded the PSC study. No strokes, transient ischemic attacks, or other cardiovascular events occurred during the present study.

PSC and US were performed to determine the functional and morphological characteristics of the carotid systems. CAG was performed in 28 of the 38 CVD patients for clinical reasons, and US findings were compared with CAG findings. Each of these examinations was performed at least 4 weeks after the patient's last CVD episode, and the intervals between these examinations were within 6 weeks.

The study protocol was in accordance with the standard ethical guidelines of Osaka University Medical School, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

PSC
Autologous platelets were labeled with In 111–tropolone according to the method of Dewanjee et al.32 The mean injected dose was 32.6±6.8 MBq, and the final labeling efficiency was 72.2±12.7%. Anterior scintigrams of the head and neck, including the upper thorax, were obtained 48 hours after injection of the labeled platelets. After the platelet study, 555 MBq Tc 99m–labeled human serum albumin was injected intravenously, and blood-pool images of the same area were obtained. Scintigrams for In 111 and Tc 99m containing 200 000 counts were obtained by using a large-field-of-view gamma camera equipped with a medium-energy, parallel-hole collimator.27

Platelet accumulation was evaluated visually and semiquantitatively (Table 1Down). Two experienced observers who were unaware of the patients' clinical data visually assessed the focal accumulation of platelets at each carotid bifurcation. Scintigrams were graded as positive, equivocal, or negative; regions that showed obviously greater activity in platelet images than in blood-pool images were classified as positive; regions that showed slightly greater activity were classified as equivocal. Regions that did not show an increase in platelet radioactivity were classified as negative. The observers initially disagreed on assessments of 7 of 120 regions, but reached agreement through discussion. Subjects were classified into three groups based on the results of visual analysis: group 1, negative bilateral carotid; group 2, at least one equivocal side; and group 3, at least one positive side.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Parameters Used to Evaluate Carotid Lesions

For semiquantitative analysis, we determined the PAI, which was defined as the ratio of the amount of radioactivity in In 111–labeled platelets deposited on the vascular wall to the amount of radioactivity in circulating labeled platelets. Square ROIs (20x20 mm) were drawn over the aortic arch and both carotid bifurcations by using the same locations for both tracers. The ROIs at the carotid bifurcations were placed in a blinded fashion (without the knowledge of the US data) by using the human serum albumin images referred to the initial arterial phase,33 after which the same ROIs were traced on the platelet images. The ROI at the aortic arch served as the reference region with absent or minimal platelet deposition. PAI values were calculated as follows27 : PAI=(InCB/InAA)/(TcCB/TcAA)-1, where InCB represents the In 111 radioactivity at the carotid bifurcation, InAA represents the In 111 radioactivity at the aortic arch, and TcCB and TcAA represent the Tc 99m radioactivity at the carotid bifurcation and aortic arch, respectively. We have found adequate reproducibility of PAI values.27

High-Resolution B-Mode US
Carotid B-mode imaging was performed with a 7.5-MHz transducer with an axial resolution of <0.4 mm (EUB-450, Hitachi). Subjects were examined in the seated position, and the carotid system was imaged from three longitudinal views and the transverse view. In our earlier study,2 the maximum thickness of the intima-media complex of healthy Japanese subjects was <=1.0 mm. Therefore, we defined atherosclerotic lesions as plaques when the axial thickness of the intima-media complex was >1.0 mm.

We evaluated carotid lesions in terms of four parameters: the plaque score, the presence of ulceration, the maximum percent stenosis, and the echogenicity of the plaque (Table 1Up). All plaques within 60 mm of the carotid bifurcation, from the common carotid artery 45 mm below the bifurcation to the internal and external carotid arteries 15 mm above the bifurcation, were evaluated separately. To quantify the severity of carotid atherosclerosis, the plaque score was obtained by summing the maximum axial thickness of all plaques in both carotid systems.2 The length of individual plaques was not considered in determining the plaque score. We classified the subjects into four groups according to the plaque score: none, 0; mild, 1.1 to 5.0; moderate, 5.1 to 10.0; and severe, >10.0. The unilateral plaque score represented the plaque score for each carotid artery and was classified into four groups: none, 0; mild, 1.1 to 2.5; moderate, 2.6 to 5.0; and severe, >5.0. Ulceration was defined as the presence of large, obvious excavations, multiple cavities, or a cavernous appearance.4 The maximum percent stenosis was calculated from the ratio of the residual lumen to the original diameter.5 Vessels were classified as having no stenosis (without plaques), low-grade stenosis (<50% maximum percent stenosis), or high-grade stenosis (>=50% maximum percent stenosis). Lesions were classified as homogeneous or heterogeneous on the basis of the echogenicity of the plaque according to the classification of Reilly et al.6 Homogeneous lesions were characterized by a uniform echo level and heterogeneous lesions by a combination of high-, medium-, and low-level echoes. If more than two plaques were present in one vessel, the tissue character of the plaque with highest maximum thickness in the vessel was evaluated.

CAG
In the 28 patients who underwent both US and CAG, carotid lesions were evaluated in terms of the presence of ulceration and the maximum percent stenosis. The CAG parameters were determined according to the recommendations of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET).34 35 Carotid angiograms were evaluated blindly by two neuroradiologists in a double-check manner.

Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed by {chi}2 and Student's t tests. Parametric comparisons of measured data obtained in more than three groups were performed by ANOVA. Scheffé's multiple comparison test was used to examine the relationship between variables. A difference of P<.05 was considered significant. Results are mean±SD.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Visual analysis identified 13 positive vessels, 30 equivocal vessels, and 77 negative vessels. Fig 1Down shows a comparison between visual and semiquantitative analyses. The mean PAI value was significantly higher in vessels with positive scintigraphic findings (19.5±10.7%) than in vessels with equivocal (9.8±6.5%; P<.01) or negative (2.1±6.3%; P<.001) findings. The PAI value was significantly higher in equivocal than in negative vessels (P<.001).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plot showing comparisons between visual and semiquantitative (PAI) analyses of platelet scintigraphy.

Plaques were present on at least one side of the carotid arteries in 48 of 60 (80%) subjects. Subjects were classified by plaque score as follows: none in 12 (20%) patients, mild in 15 (25%), moderate in 20 (33%), and severe in 13 (22%). An increased plaque score was associated with an increase in the percentage of subjects with an equivocal (group 2) or positive (group 3) plaque accumulation (P<.001) (Fig 2Down). The subjects with moderate to severe plaque scores had a higher incidence of group 3 than those with plaque scores of none to mild (P<.05).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bar graph showing relationship between plaque score (severity of carotid atherosclerosis) and severity of platelet accumulation in each subject. Open bars indicate the percentage of subjects in group 1 (bilateral carotid artery negative platelet accumulation); hatched bars, percentage in group 2 (at least one equivocal side); and solid bars, percentage in group 3 (at least one positive side).

CAG and US assessments of maximum percent stenosis in 28 patients (56 vessels) were significantly correlated (r=.89, P<.01). CAG and US identifications of ulceration were in agreement in 53 of 56 (95%) vessels (P<.01).

Plaques were present on 81 of 120 vessels; 11 were classified as homogeneous and 70 were classified as heterogeneous. Ulcers were found on 16 vessels. All ulcerated plaques showed heterogeneous echogenicity. Fig 3Down compares the PAI values with the US characteristics of carotid lesions. The mean PAI value in vessels with ulceration (15.8±11.8%) was significantly higher than that of the other three groups, ie, vessels without plaque (1.9±7.0%; P<.001), vessels with homogeneous plaque (4.5±5.3%; P<.05), and vessels with heterogeneous plaque without ulcer formation (6.2±7.7%; P<.05). The mean PAI value of the vessels with homogeneous plaque (4.5±5.3%) was lower than that of all heterogeneous plaques (8.4±9.6%) and heterogeneous plaque without ulcer formation (6.2±7.7%), although without statistical significance. Fig 4Down shows imaging findings in a representative patient.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Plot showing comparisons between PAI and US characteristics of carotid lesions. Significantly higher platelet accumulation in vessels with ulceration [ulcer (+)] was observed compared with the other three groups: vessels without plaque [plaque (-)], vessels with homogeneous (homo) plaque [plaque (+)], and vessels with heterogeneous (hetero) plaque without ulcer formation [ulcer (-)].



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. CAG (A), B-mode US (B), and platelet imaging (C and D) in a 58-year-old man who suffered from transient ischemic attacks with left hemiparesis. Large arrows in A and B indicate obviously ulcerated lesions in the right internal carotid artery (Rt) (57% stenosis with a unilateral plaque score of 6.0); small arrows in B, carotid bifurcation; and arrow in C, pathological, positive platelet accumulation in the right carotid artery. Images in C and D were obtained by means of a dual-tracer method that used (C) In 111–labeled platelets and (D) Tc 99m–labeled human serum albumin (HSA) (PAI=27.6%).

Fig 5Down shows the relation between the severity of carotid lesions and platelet imaging by visual analysis. Platelet accumulation increased in association with increases in the maximum percent stenosis (P<.0001) and the unilateral plaque score (P<.0001). To examine the direct effect of stenosis and unilateral plaque score, we compared the numerical values of these indexes with the PAI values of the vessels with plaque formation. The PAI value showed a very weak but significant positive correlation with maximum percent stenosis (r=.28, P<.05) and a stronger correlation with the unilateral plaque score (r=.42, P<.0001) (Fig 6Down).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Bar graphs showing relationship between severity of carotid lesions (maximum percent stenosis and unilateral plaque score) and platelet imaging in each carotid artery. Open bars indicate percentage of vessels with negative platelet accumulation; hatched bars, those with equivocal accumulation; and solid bars, those with a positive accumulation.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Scatterplots showing relationships between PAIs in vessels with plaque formation and maximum percent stenosis (top) and unilateral plaque score (bottom).

There were no significant differences between CVD patients (n=38) and non-CVD patients (n=22) in the incidence of risk factors for atherosclerosis. The mean age in CVD patients was significantly (P<.05) younger than that in non-CVD patients (Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Incidence of Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis in All Subjects

Table 3Down shows the US characteristics of carotid lesions and platelet imaging in each carotid artery ipsilateral to the symptomatic and asymptomatic hemispheres. Seven of 38 CVD patients showed symptoms referable to the bilateral carotid systems. We classified all 120 vessels as either symptomatic (ipsilateral to the symptomatic hemisphere; n=45) or asymptomatic (n=75). The prevalence of plaque formation did not differ between the two groups. Ulceration was significantly more frequent in the symptomatic group (P<.05). The average maximum percent stenosis was significantly higher in the symptomatic group (P<.05). Positive platelet accumulation was significantly more frequent in the symptomatic group (P<.001), and the mean PAI value of the symptomatic group was significantly higher than in the asymptomatic group (P<.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Carotid Lesion and Platelet Imaging Ipsilateral to Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Sides


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Platelets play an important role in the initial steps of atherosclerosis as they interact with or adhere to subendothelial connective tissue and release their constituents.36 The progression and spontaneous regression of carotid atherosclerosis are multifactorial, and the exact role of platelets remains to be clarified.7 20 37 Although a number of studies21 22 23 24 25 26 27 have shown that PSC is useful for evaluation of carotid lesions, others30 38 have found it of little value. Problems associated with the methods used to evaluate function and morphology may be responsible for these conflicting results. As a functional evaluation, qualitative assessment with In 111–labeled platelets alone may not be sensitive enough to detect small foci of platelet deposition due to interference from the radioactivity of circulating labeled platelets. CAG has been used in most studies as a morphological evaluation, but CAG cannot give information about vessel wall characteristics. In addition, it is clear that antithrombotic medication influences the outcome of PSC.28 29 To minimize these problems in the present study, we selected patients who were not receiving antithrombotic medication and examined the relation between platelet deposition as obtained by dual-tracer PSC and morphological characteristics as obtained by US.

We evaluated the results of PSC by using visual and semiquantitative analyses and showed that parameters obtained by both analyses correlated well with US parameters. Appropriate use of visual analysis is important in the daily clinical situation, but semiquantitative analysis offers a more precise and objective evaluation.

Platelet accumulation increased with increases in plaque score, especially when the plaque score was >5.0 (Fig 2Up). Crouse et al39 have proposed a scoring system for extracranial carotid atherosclerosis and have shown a positive relationship with atherosclerotic risk factors.8 The plaque score is a clinically useful index for quantification of total carotid atherosclerosis.2 9 10 The incidence of symptomatic11 and asymptomatic12 cerebral infarctions increases as the plaque score increases, especially when the score is >5.0. Carotid atherosclerosis is a part of systemic atherosclerosis, and platelet adhesion and accumulation cause it to progress. The results cited above indicate that the classification of our grading system of the plaque score was valid.

The morphological findings obtained by CAG and US in the present study were in close agreement. For maximum percent stenosis, our results were consistent with those of O'Donnell et al,13 who report that both CAG and US show good agreement with pathological findings. On the other hand, for the diagnosis of ulceration, the accuracy of CAG or US compared with pathological examinations is controversial, ranging from 60% to 95%.6 14 15 16 35 40 This discrepancy may result from differences in radiological and pathological criteria. Moore et al41 classify the angiographic appearance of ulcerations into three groups: type A (small minimal excavations), type B (large obvious excavations), and type C (multiple cavities or cavernous appearance) ulcers. In our US study, type B and/or C ulcers were evaluated simply as ulcers. We have reported an 85% accuracy of US diagnosis of ulcer formation when comparing pathological and US findings,4 which is similar to the results of Jones et al14 (95%) and Reilly et al6 (71%). O'Leary et al,15 who report 60% accuracy, may have primarily evaluated the type B ulcer of Moore et al41 without considering the type C ulcer. On the other hand, due to the limited spatial resolution of B-mode imaging compared with microscopic findings, we may have missed small shallow ulcers, such as Moore's type A ulcer.

Platelet accumulation was significantly greater in ulcerated plaques, as assessed by semiquantitative analysis (Fig 3Up). Our results are consistent with those of Goldman et al,21 Henningsen,26 and Isaka et al,27 who report that the activity of radiolabeled platelets was greater in ulcerated plaques than in nonulcerated stenosis. Endothelial injury in the ulcerated lesion is believed to play a central role in platelet activation.36

Heterogeneous plaque showed a nonsignificant tendency to accumulate more platelets than homogeneous plaque (Fig 3Up). When Reilly et al6 compared pathological findings obtained at the carotid endarterectomy with preoperative US findings, they found that heterogeneous plaque was associated with a higher frequency of intraplaque hemorrhage, whereas homogeneous plaque consisted mainly of fibrous lesions. US-assessed heterogeneous plaque is associated with the occurrence of neurological symptoms.17 18 These results suggest that the increase of platelet accumulation in heterogeneous plaques may lead to clinical symptoms. It is possible that occult ulcers, such as the type A ulcer of Moore et al,41 which are difficult to diagnose and may be overlooked by US, may be concealed by heterogeneous lesions.42 The nature of these lesions, including their potential embolic character, should be considered when a remedial plan for carotid artery disease is established.

Platelet accumulation was weakly but significantly correlated with maximum percent stenosis (r=.28), which is consistent with the results of Powers et al22 and Kessler et al.23 The correlation between the PAI and the unilateral plaque score (r=.42) was somewhat stronger. These results suggest the possibility that platelet accumulation is related to total carotid atherosclerosis rather than to the maximum stenosis at a single site. However, the magnitude of these values was at best modest. This result may arise partly from a difference in characteristics between platelet accumulation and US parameters. Though both stenosis and plaque score are influential factors in platelet accumulation, there are, of course, other factors that affect platelet accumulation.

Except for age, risk factors did not differ between CVD and non-CVD patients. The results of our comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic groups suggest the possibility that ulceration and maximum percent stenosis affect platelet accumulation and clinical symptoms. The NASCET study43 has demonstrated that high-grade stenosis and ulceration are associated with a high risk of stroke. To evaluate whether and to what extent US parameters and platelet accumulation affect the prediction of CVD, additional prospective studies are needed.

The main limitation of this study is due to methodological problems with PSC. The first problem is the limited resolution of a gamma imaging system. Goldman et al21 report from a theoretical phantom study that a certain number of platelets are necessary for a positive scintigram, and it is clear that PSC has inherently poor spatial and contrast resolution.22 26 30 The second problem is the ROI setting needed to calculate the PAI. The ROI used in this study (20x20 mm) was too wide for the carotid bifurcation, which contains the vessel wall and surrounding soft tissues. However, ROIs that are too small cannot contain statistically adequate counts. The third problem is the difficulty of an appropriate choice of reference region. Powers et al44 report that the vascular region with the minimal ratio of In 111 to Tc 99m, such as the aortic arch, is considered to represent the area with minimal or absent In 111 platelet deposition. However, atherosclerotic changes and platelet accumulation in the aortic arch may result in an underestimation of the PAI.

As a morphological diagnostic device, US also has clear limitations. For example, US may miss up to 40% of ulcers due to the lack of well-developed criteria for the US appearance of ulceration and limitations in image resolution.15

Another limitation of our results is the distribution of PAIs, which overlapped widely among vessels in each group (Fig 3Up). One possible explanation is that the group of ulcerated vessels included ulcerations of various sizes. Thiele et al19 report that the embolic potential changes with differences in the size of the ulceration. Another possibility is that in some ulcerated vessels, platelet thrombi are present only transiently and are no longer present when PSC is performed.30

In conclusion, by using noninvasive PSC and B-mode US, we evaluated the relation between in vivo thrombogenicity and the morphology of carotid atherothrombotic lesions. Platelet accumulation was related to the presence of ulceration and the severity of carotid atherosclerosis. For the evaluation of carotid lesions, noninvasive and widespread B-mode imaging may be useful in predicting thrombogenicity, which can be visually estimated by platelet imaging.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
CAG = cerebral angiography
CVD = cerebrovascular disease
PAI = platelet accumulation index
PSC = platelet scintigraphy
ROI = region of interest
US = ultrasonography


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a research grant for cardiovascular diseases from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and was also supported in part by the Smoking Research Foundation. The authors thank Y. Kusumi, H. Ohmori, and Y. Nakamura for their technical assistance. The authors also thank M. Shimomura and R. Manabe for their invaluable secretarial assistance.

Received March 15, 1995; accepted September 25, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Millikan CH. The pathogenesis of transient focal cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 1965;32:438-450. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Handa N, Matsumoto M, Maeda H, Hougaku H, Ogawa S, Fukunaga R, Yoneda S, Kimura K, Kamada T. Ultrasonic evaluation of early carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke.. 1990;21:1567-1572. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Bots ML, van Swieten JC, Breteler MMB, de Jong PTVM, van Gijn J, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Cerebral white matter lesions and atherosclerosis in the Rotterdam Study. Lancet.. 1993;341:1232-1237. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Handa N, Matsumoto M, Kamada T. Ultrasonic assessment of carotid lesions [in Japanese]. Gendai Iryo.. 1993;25:1247-1251.

5. Ricotta JJ, Bryan FA, Bond MG, Kurtz A, O'Leary DH, Raines JK, Berson AS, Clouse ME, Calderon-Ortiz M, Toole JF, DeWeese JA, Smullens SN, Gustafson NF. Multicenter validation study of real-time (B-mode) ultrasound, arteriography, and pathologic examination. J Vasc Surg.. 1987;6:512-520. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Reilly LM, Lusby RJ, Hughes L, Ferrell LD, Stoney RJ, Ehrenfeld WK. Carotid plaque histology using real-time ultrasonography: clinical and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg.. 1983;146:188-193. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Blankenhorn DH, Hodis HN. Arterial imaging and atherosclerosis reversal. Arterioscler Thromb.. 1994;14:177-192. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Crouse JR, Toole JF, McKinney WM, Dignan MB, Howard G, Kahl FR, McMahan MR, Harpold GH. Risk factors for extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. Stroke.. 1987;18:990-996. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Crouse JR III, Thompson CJ. An evaluation of methods for imaging and quantifying coronary and carotid lumen stenosis and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1993;87(suppl II):II-17-II-33.

10. Tanaka H, Nishino M, Ishida M, Fukunaga R, Sueyoshi K. Progression of carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease. Stroke.. 1992;23:946-951. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Handa N, Matsumoto M, Maeda H, Hougaku H, Ogawa S, Itoh T, Kimura K, Kamada T. Carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese patients: an ultrasonic study. In: Oka M, Von Reutern G-M, Furuhata H, Kodaira K, eds. Recent Advances in Neurosonology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1992:445-448.

12. Hougaku H, Matsumoto M, Handa N, Maeda H, Itoh T, Tsukamoto Y, Kamada T. Asymptomatic carotid lesions and silent cerebral infarction. Stroke.. 1994;25:566-570. [Abstract]

13. O'Donnell TF, Erdoes L, Mackey WC, McCullough J, Shepard A, Heggerick P, Isner J, Callow AD. Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with pathologic findings at carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg.. 1985;120:443-449. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Jones AM, Biller J, Cowley AR, Howard G, McKinney WM, Toole JF. Extracranial carotid artery arteriosclerosis: diagnosis with continuous-wave Doppler and real-time ultrasound studies. Arch Neurol.. 1982;39:393-394. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. O'Leary DH, Holen J, Ricotta JJ, Roe S, Schenk EA. Carotid bifurcation disease: prediction of ulceration with B-mode US. Radiology.. 1987;162:523-525. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Wasserman BA, Haacke EM, Li D. Carotid plaque formation and its evaluation with angiography, ultrasound, and MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging.. 1994;4:515-527. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Steinke W, Hennerici M, Rautenberg W, Mohr JP. Symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenoses in Doppler color-flow imaging. Neurology.. 1992;42:131-138. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Geroulakos G, Ramaswami G, Nicolaides A, James K, Labropoulos N, Belcaro G, Holloway M. Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution real-time ultrasonography. Br J Surg.. 1993;80:1274-1277. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Thiele BL, Jones AM, Hobson RW, Bandyk DF, Baker WH, Sumner DS, Rutherford RB. Standards in noninvasive cerebrovascular testing. J Vasc Surg.. 1992;15:495-503. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Bornstein NM, Norris JW. The unstable carotid plaque. Stroke.. 1989;20:1104-1106. [Free Full Text]

21. Goldman M, Leung JO, Aukland A, Hawker RJ, Drolc Z, McCollum CN. 111-Indium platelet imaging, Doppler spectral analysis, and angiography compared in patients with transient cerebral ischemia. Stroke.. 1983;14:752-756. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Powers WJ, Siegel BA, Davis HH II, Mathias CJ, Clark HB, Welch MJ. Indium-111 platelet scintigraphy in cerebrovascular disease. Neurology.. 1982;32:938-943. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Kessler CH, Reuther R, Berentelg J, Kimmig B. The clinical use of platelet scintigraphy with 111-In-oxine. J Neurol.. 1983;229:255-261. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Goldman M. Platelet scintigraphy in stroke patients. In: Kessler CH, Hardeman MR, Henningsen H, Petrovici JN, eds. Clinical Application of Radiolabelled Platelets: Developments in Nuclear Medicine, 17. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990:173-179.

25. Ringelstein EB, Wicke A, Holken M, Fiedler G, Weiller C, Bull U. Indium-111-platelet scintigraphy in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery disease: preliminary findings of a prospective study. In: Kessler CH, Hardeman MR, Henningsen H, Petrovici JN, eds. Clinical Application of Radiolabelled Platelets: Developments in Nuclear Medicine, 17. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990:180-194.

26. Henningsen H. Platelet scintigraphy of the carotid arteries: comparison with the histology of thromboendarterectomy specimens. In: Poeck K, Ringelstein EB, Hacke W, eds. New Trends in Diagnosis and Management of Stroke. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1987:47-57.

27. Isaka Y, Kimura K, Yoneda S, Kusunoki M, Etani H, Uyama O, Tsuda Y, Abe H. Platelet accumulation in carotid atherosclerotic lesions: semiquantitative analysis with indium-111 platelets and technetium-99m human serum albumin. J Nucl Med.. 1984;25:556-563. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Isaka Y, Handa N, Imaizumi M, Kimura K, Kamada T. Effect of TRK-100, a stable orally active prostacyclin analogue, on platelet function and plaque size in atherothrombotic strokes. Thromb Haemost.. 1991;65:344-350. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Isaka Y, Kimura K, Etani H, Uehara A, Uyama O, Yoneda S, Kamada T, Kusunoki M. Effect of aspirin and ticlopidine on platelet deposition in carotid atherosclerosis: assessment by indium-111 platelet scintigraphy. Stroke.. 1986;17:1215-1220. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Minar E, Ehringer H, Dudczak R, Schofl R, Jung M, Koppensteiner R, Ahmadi R, Kretschmer G. Indium-111–labeled platelet scintigraphy in carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke.. 1989;20:27-33. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Whisnant JP, Basford JR, Bernstein EF, Cooper ES, Dyken ML, Easton JD, Little JR, Marler JR, Millikan CH, Petito CK, Price TR, Raichle ME, Robertson JT, Thiele B, Walker MD, Zimmerman RA. Classification of cerebrovascular diseases, III. Stroke.. 1990;21:637-676. [Free Full Text]

32. Dewanjee MK, Rao SA, Didisheim P. Indium-111 tropolone, a new high-affinity platelet label: preparation and evaluation of labeling parameters. J Nucl Med.. 1981;22:981-987. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Jones RH, Klaphaak RB, Sabiston DC Jr. Anatomic resolution in dynamic radionuclide studies by computer identification of radioactivity fluctuation with time. In: Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Sharing of Computer Programs and Technology in Nuclear Medicine. Oak Ridge, Tenn: Atomic Energy Commission Conference; 1972:151-168.

34. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committee. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke.. 1991;22:711-720. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Streifler JY, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Benavente OR, Hachinski VC, Ferguson GG, Barnett HJM. Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration: comparison with surgical observations in a multicenter study. Stroke.. 1994;25:1130-1132. [Abstract]

36. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature.. 1993;362:801-809. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Wu KK, Phillips M, D'Souza D, Hellums JD. Platelet activation and arterial thrombosis. Lancet.. 1994;344:991-995. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Branchereau A, Bernard PJ, Ciosi G, Bazan M, Laforte C, Elias A, Bouvier JL. Indium-111 platelet scintigraphy in carotid disease. Ann Vasc Surg.. 1988;2:215-219. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Crouse JR, Harpold GH, Kahl FR, Toole JF, Mckinney WM. Evaluation of a scoring system for extracranial carotid atherosclerosis extent with B-mode ultrasound. Stroke.. 1986;17:270-275. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Edwards JH, Kricheff II, Riles T, Imparato A. Angiographically undetected ulceration of the carotid bifurcation as a cause of embolic stroke. Radiology.. 1979;132:369-373. [Abstract]

41. Moore WS, Boren C, Malone JM, Roon AJ, Eisenberg R, Goldstone J, Mani R. Natural history of nonstenotic, asymptomatic ulcerative lesions of the carotid artery. Arch Surg.. 1978;113:1352-1359. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Wechsler LR. Ulceration and carotid artery disease. Stroke.. 1987;22:19-23.

43. Eliasziw M, Streifler JY, Fox AJ, Hachinski VC, Ferguson GG, Barnett HJM, for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke.. 1994;25:304-308. [Abstract]

44. Powers WJ, Mathias CJ, Welch MJ, Sherman LA, Siegel BA, Clarkson TB. Scintigraphic detection of platelet deposition in atherosclerotic macaques: a new technique for investigation of antithrombotic drugs. Thromb Res.. 1982;25:137-142.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. F. Langer, R. Haubner, B. J. Pichler, and M. Gawaz
Radionuclide imaging a molecular key to the atherosclerotic plaque.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. R. Davies, J. H. Rudd, and P. L. Weissberg
Molecular and Metabolic Imaging of Atherosclerosis
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1898 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Manca, G. Parenti, R. Bellina, G. Boni, M. Grosso, W. Bernini, C. Palombo, M. Paterni, G. Pelosi, M. Lanza, et al.
111In Platelet Scintigraphy for the Noninvasive Detection of Carotid Plaque Thrombosis
Stroke, March 1, 2001; 32(3): 719 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Pasterkamp, E. Falk, H. Woutman, and C. Borst
Techniques characterizing the coronary atherosclerotic plaque: influence on clinical decision making?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2000; 36(1): 13 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moriwaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moriwaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T.