Articles |
From the Center for Human Nutrition (F.T., G.L.V., S.M.G.) and Departments of Clinical Nutrition (G.L.V., S.M.G.), Internal Medicine (S.M.G.), and Biochemistry (S.M.G.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, and the Department of Internal Medicine (A.R.T.), College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Gloria Lena Vega, PhD, Center for Human Nutrition, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Room Y3.206, Dallas, TX 75235-9052.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hypercholesterolemia combined hyperlipidemia cholesterol ester transfer protein
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nonetheless, several reports9 10 11 12 13 14 indicate that patients with various forms of hyperlipidemia often have relatively high activities or levels of CETP. This observation raises the possibility that an increased activity of CETP contributes to elevated cholesterol levels in lipoproteins containing apolipoprotein B (apo B). The present study therefore was carried out to examine the strength of the association between plasma CETP activities and cholesterol concentrations in patients with hypercholesterolemia (elevated LDL cholesterol and normal triglyceride concentrations) and in those with combined hyperlipidemia (elevated LDL cholesterol and high triglycerides). Furthermore, the relation between CETP activities and the distribution of cholesterol between apo Bcontaining lipoproteins and HDL was examined. Normolipidemic patients served as a reference group to evaluate these relations. A sizable number of patients were selected for each group to obtain more detailed information on the strength of the association between CETP activities and lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design
The primary purpose of the study was to determine CETP
activities in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and with
combined hyperlipidemia. Therefore, the population under investigation
was enriched with patients of this type. This selection was aided by
studying patients who were referred to the lipid clinic of the medical
center. Another source included frozen plasma from patients who had
been seen previously in the clinic and in whom lipid and lipoprotein
values had already been obtained. In this study, the term
hypercholesterolemia was defined as a plasma LDL cholesterol level
160 mg/dL and a triglyceride level <200 mg/dL. Combined
hyperlipidemia was defined as an LDL cholesterol
160 mg/dL and a
triglyceride level between 200 and 500 mg/dL. Normolipidemia was
defined as an LDL cholesterol <160 mg/dL, triglycerides <200 mg/dL,
and HDL cholesterol
40 mg/dL. The LDL cholesterol and triglyceride
levels selected for classification generally conform to those of the
National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines.15
Although most of the patients had previous measurements of lipids and
lipoproteins, the values used in the current analysis
represented the lipid and lipoprotein levels obtained on the same
plasma samples in which CETP activity was measured.
Measurement of Lipids and Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Blood samples were drawn by venipuncture and collected into
tubes containing disodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA) after a
12-hour fast. On these samples, levels of plasma triglyceride,
cholesterol, and lipoprotein cholesterol were measured. Aliquots of
plasma also were frozen at -70°C. Levels of plasma total cholesterol
and triglycerides were measured enzymatically.16 17
Concentrations of HDL cholesterol were measured in plasma after
precipitation of apo Bcontaining lipoproteins with 0.55 mmol/L
phosphotungstic acid and 25 mmol/L magnesium chloride.18
This method has been reported to give results for HDL cholesterol
similar to levels obtained by heparin-manganese precipitation of apo
Bcontaining lipoproteins19 20 ; this close similarity was
confirmed in our laboratory. LDL cholesterol was calculated using the
Friedewald formula21 when triglycerides were <300 mg/dL.
When triglycerides were
300 mg/dL, the plasma was subjected to
ultracentrifugation at d<1.0063 g/mL, and LDL cholesterol
was quantified after precipitation of HDL cholesterol from the plasma
infranatant of d>1.0063 g/mL.19
Measurement of CETP Activity
General Approach
In this study, a method was used to measure CETP activity
in a way that approximates CETP mass concentration. The method was a
modification of the procedure of Tollefson and Albers,22
and a recent report10 indicates that there is a close
correspondence between measured activities of CETP and mass determined
by radioimmunoassay. To confirm the correspondence, a comparison was
made between estimated concentrations and activities in 50 plasma
samples. Activities were measured on frozen samples in the Dallas
laboratory and mass concentrations were determined at Columbia
University, New York City, by one of the authors (A.R.T.). A
solid-phase competitive radioimmunoassay23 was used for
mass measurements.
The assay for plasma CETP activity was standardized for linearity as a function of incubation time and volume of plasma used in the assay. Coefficients of interassay, intra-assay, and physiological variation were determined. The latter was measured in 25 subjects during their admission to the metabolic ward for evaluation for dyslipidemia. These measurements were done on plasma obtained during three consecutive days. In addition, the physiological variability in CETP activity over a longer period was studied in 19 patients. In these patients, CETP activity was assayed in a fresh plasma sample and in a sample that had been drawn 2 to 3 years previously and had been frozen at -70°C.
Procedure
CETP activity was measured as the percent of the total tritiated
CE (3H-CE) transferred from HDL3 (donor
lipoprotein) to LDL (acceptor lipoprotein) in the presence of a small
volume of the patient's plasma. Donor and acceptor lipoproteins were
prepared from 300 mL of plasma obtained from six healthy,
normolipidemic volunteers. LDL (d=1.02 to 1.063 g/mL) and
the plasma fraction of d>1.125 g/mL were isolated by
preparative ultracentrifugation.24 LDL was dialyzed
against Tris buffer (10 mol/L Tris base, 2 mmol/L EDTA, 150 mmol/L
NaCl, and 0.01% NaN3, pH 7.4). In addition, the LDL
was diluted with the Tris buffer to a final concentration of 200 mg/dL
and stored frozen in aliquots at -20°C until used in the assay. The
plasma fraction of d>1.125 g/mL was also dialyzed against
Tris buffer and used for the preparation of radiolabeled
HDL3. Briefly, 1.5 µCi of tritiated cholesterol
([7(n)-3H]cholesterol, 6.1 Ci/mmol, Amersham Searle)
per milligram of cholesterol was injected below the surface of the
d>1.125 g/mL plasma fraction while stirring. This was
followed by incubation at 37°C for 18 hours to allow for the
formation of 3H-CE, a reaction catalyzed by lecithin
cholesteryl acyl transferase. HDL3 (d=1.125 to
1.21 g/mL) was isolated by preparative ultracentrifugation. The
lipoprotein was dialyzed against Tris buffer and diluted to a final
cholesterol concentration of 40 mg/dL. The specific activity of HDL CE
averaged 3333 dpm/mg. The radiolabeled HDL3 was stored at
4°C until used in the assay. The distribution of radiolabeled
unesterified and esterified cholesterol was determined in
HDL3 after separation of the lipids by thin-layer
chromatography. More than 90% of the radiolabeled cholesterol was
esterified. Donor and acceptor lipoproteins were stable for a period of
6 months.
The CETP assay consisted of 50 µL of the radiolabeled HDL3 preparation, 200 µL of the LDL preparation, and 20 µL of plasma diluted 1:3 (vol/vol) in Tris buffer or 20 µL of Tris buffer used as blank. The total assay volume was 270 µL. Two quality controls and blanks were included in each assay. The quality controls consisted of a plasma sample with a low CETP activity (<20% transfer/16 hours) and another with high CETP activity (>35% transfer/16 hours). The blanks and quality controls were measured in triplicate for each assay. Plasma samples of control subjects and patients were assayed in duplicate.
Samples, blanks, and quality controls were incubated at 37°C for 16 hours, and the reaction was stopped by transferring the assay tubes to ice for 15 minutes. Donor and acceptor lipoproteins were separated by precipitation of LDL with heparin/MnCl2. The precipitation was carried out using 92 mmol/L MnCl225 and 0.22 mg/dL of heparin. This modification in the heparin concentration was found to minimize the coprecipitation of HDL without interfering with the complete precipitation of LDL. One hundred fifty microliters of the supernatant was counted for 20 minutes in a liquid scintillation counter. CETP activity was expressed as the percentage of radioactivity transferred from 3H-HDL3 to LDL during 16 hours of incubation. Values were corrected for blanks and variation of quality controls.
Standardization of CETP Activity
The linearity of the assay as a function of plasma volume used
in the assay and of incubation time is shown in Fig 1
.
The assay was linear for a sample volume ranging from 1.25 to 7.5 µL.
Samples with high activity or low activity exhibited similar degrees of
linearity. The assay was also linear for each sample as a function of
incubation time between 3 and 18 hours. Therefore, all subsequent
assays were performed using 5 µL of plasma sample and 16-hour
incubations.
|
The intra-assay coefficient of variation for the sample with high activity was 2.62%, and for the low-activity sample it was 4.42%. To determine the coefficients of variation, each sample was measured 18 times. The interassay coefficients of variation were 4.55% and 6.71% for the high- and low-activity samples, respectively. These coefficients were estimated from 12 individual measurements of the sample with high and low activities. The physiological coefficient of variation for 25 individuals averaged 5.76±2.52%. To estimate this variation, each subject had a measurement of CETP activity during each of 3 consecutive days during their evaluation for dyslipidemia.
The activity of CETP was compared between plasma samples that had been
frozen and stored for a maximum time of 3 years and freshly isolated
samples from the same individual (Fig 2A
). These
measurements were carried out in plasma of 19 different subjects. The
coefficient of correlation for the two measurements was 0.96
(P<.0001). Moreover, the largest difference between the two
measurements did not exceed 10.9%.
|
CETP activity and mass measurements were comparable (Fig 2B
). The
coefficient of correlation for the two methods was 0.85
(P<.0001). This agreement extended to dyslipidemic and
normolipidemic samples. The dyslipidemic samples included 18 subjects
with normotriglyceridemia and low HDL cholesterol, 16 subjects with
hypercholesterolemia, and 12 subjects with combined hyperlipidemia. The
phenotype of dyslipidemia had no effect on the relation of CETP mass
and activity.
Statistics
Results are summarized as mean±SD. Comparison of means was made
by using one-way analysis of variance followed by
Bonferroni-adjusted t tests for multiple comparisons.
Logarithmic transformations of CETP activity were performed to correct
for differences in variance between the 3 groups of patients.
Differences in the frequency of categorical variables (CHD,
hypertension, smoking, intake of ß-blockers) were tested with the
2 test. The distribution of CETP activity was
tested for normality using Wild-Shapiro tests for n
50 and
Anderson-Darling tests for n>50. Levene's test was performed to test
for homogeneity of variances. Modeling of the distributions of CETP
activity was carried out using the normal probability density function.
Correlations were calculated by linear regression and stepwise
regression analysis. A value of P=.05 was considered
significant. Data management and statistical analyses were performed
using CLINFO and BMDP software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
CETP Activities
Mean activities and distribution characteristics of CETP in the
three groups are detailed in Table 3
. The frequency
distributions of CETP activities in the three groups are presented
in Figs 3 through 5![]()
![]()
.
Best-fit distribution curves are shown for each group. Both
hypercholesterolemic and combined hyperlipidemic groups had
significantly higher mean activities of CETP than the normolipidemic
group (Table 3
). Ranges and variances were greater in the two
hyperlipidemic cohorts, but in both, distributions were shifted to
higher values (Figs 3 through 5![]()
![]()
).
|
|
|
|
Correlations between CETP activities and various parameters are
presented in Table 4
. Data are given for
correlations only within each group. The correlation coefficients
(r2) presented represent the
appropriate statistical contribution of CETP activities to each
parameter. There were no significant relations between CETP activities
and age, BMI, or total triglycerides. Total cholesterol levels were
significantly correlated with CETP activity only within the
hypercholesterolemic group, but LDL cholesterol levels were positively
and significantly correlated with CETP activities for all three groups.
The same was true for non-HDL cholesterol levels and for non-HDL/HDL
ratios in normolipidemic and combined hyperlipidemic patients. CETP
activities showed a trend toward a negative correlation with HDL
cholesterol levels, but the correlation was significant only for the
group with combined hyperlipidemia.
|
The failure to detect a significant correlation between CETP activities
and non-HDL cholesterol levels in the hypercholesterolemic group may
have been due to an insufficiently wide range of cholesterol levels in
this fraction. The marked difference in mean CETP activities between
normolipidemic and hypercholesterolemic groups, both having normal
triglyceride levels, suggested that CETP activities may be
significantly correlated with cholesterol levels over a broader range
of levels in normotriglyceridemic subjects. To examine this
possibility, a number of patients equal to those with normolipidemia
were selected from the hypercholesterolemic group, and the two sets
were combined and analyzed together. The 50 patients from the
hypercholesterolemic group were those with the 50 lowest levels of
triglycerides, which made their triglyceride concentrations similar to
the normolipidemic group. The data showed a high correlation between
CETP activities and non-HDL cholesterol
(r2=.42; P<.0001), LDL
cholesterol (r2=.43;
P<.0001), and non-HDL/HDL ratios
(r2=.28; P<.0001) (Fig 6
). Also, there was a significant inverse correlation
(r2=.12; P<.001) between CETP
activities and HDL cholesterol concentrations.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies9 10 11 12 13 14 have demonstrated that patients with elevated cholesterol levels tend to have increased CETP activity, but recent opinion seems to be that plasma CETP levels actually have little influence on concentrations of lipoprotein cholesterol. Rather, the prevalent view holds that CETP plays an important role in the shuttling of CE between lipoproteins in their passage through the plasma, but beyond this, it has little effect on cholesterol concentrations. In accord, the predominant hypothesis is that high CETP activities are secondary to increased cholesterol levels; that is, hypercholesterolemia causes high CETP activity. An important question is whether this hypothesis is correct. For example, in the presence of a genetic deficiency of CETP, concentrations of lipoproteins are markedly altered. While this may be an extreme case, it raises the question of whether lesser variations in CETP activity could affect lipoprotein concentrations. In the discussion to follow, we examine the current findings to see whether they shed any light on the nature of the relation between CETP activities and lipoprotein levels.
Normotriglyceridemic Patients
Normolipidemic Patients
Even though our patients in this category had a relatively narrow
range of CETP activities, within the group there nevertheless were
positive, significant correlations between CETP activities and LDL
cholesterol levels, non-HDL cholesterol levels, and non-HDL/HDL ratios.
If these correlations were to represent a causal connection, then
in normolipidemic subjects, differences in CETP activities could
account for 13% to 14% of the variability in levels of cholesterol in
apo Bcontaining lipoproteins.
Hypercholesterolemic Patients
This group of patients had significantly higher CETP levels than
normolipidemic subjects. The increment averaged 42% (Table 3
).
Approximately 60% of hypercholesterolemic patients had CETP activities
outside the normal distribution curve (Fig 4
). Thus, high CETP
activities appear to be characteristic of the majority of
normotriglyceridemic patients with hypercholesterolemia. Although CETP
values for the group were shifted to higher values, there was a
relatively small but significant correlation between CETP activities
and LDL cholesterol levels within this group; variability in activities
of CETP appeared to account for only about 4% of the variation in LDL
cholesterol concentrations within the group. This small effect,
however, should not obscure the marked difference in CETP activities
between normolipidemic and hypercholesterolemic groups.
Summed Normotriglyceridemic Patients
Although the two normotriglyceridemic groups were selected
separately, we have attempted to determine the correlation between CETP
activities and lipoprotein levels across the entire range of
cholesterol concentrations. This could not be done simply by combining
the two groups. Therefore, an effort was made to obtain
"comparable" samples by selecting equal numbers from both groups
having similar triglyceride levels. The findings shown in Fig 6
(A and
B) indicate that a strong, positive correlation was obtained between
CETP activities and concentrations of both LDL cholesterol and non-HDL
cholesterol. Variation in CETP activities appeared to account for about
45% of the variance in cholesterol concentrations in these two
fractions. While it can be questioned whether CETP variation could
explain such a high proportion of the variation in cholesterol levels,
the results do not appear to be much out of line with the marked
difference in CETP activities between normolipidemic and
hypercholesterolemic groups. Thus, there is a strong link between CETP
activities and cholesterol concentrations in patients with
normotriglyceridemia. In this summed analysis, there also was a
high correlation between CETP activities and non-HDL/HDL ratios (Fig 6C
).
Combined Hyperlipidemia
In this group, mean CETP activities were strikingly elevated
compared with the normolipidemic group. Furthermore, within this group,
CETP activities were significantly correlated with LDL cholesterol,
non-HDL cholesterol, and particularly with non-HDL/HDL ratios (Table 4
). These relatively high correlations are conspicuous considering how
relatively narrow was the range of cholesterol levels. This finding
suggests that CETP may be particularly active in the presence of high
triglyceride concentrations, as previously suggested by Mann et
al.26
Interpretation
The above observations are at least compatible with the concept
that CETP may be one of several factors affecting concentrations of
cholesterol in apo Bcontaining lipoproteins. The mechanisms whereby a
high CETP activity could elevate cholesterol concentrations in these
lipoproteins theoretically is related to the basic action of the
protein. CETP is known to transfer CE from HDL to VLDL, IDL, and
LDL.2 3 4 5 The resulting enrichment with CE could increase
the cholesterol concentrations in these lipoprotein fractions in two
ways. First, the enrichment process itself could raise the cholesterol
concentration even without an increase in the number of circulating
lipoprotein particles. For example, a recent report from our
laboratory27 revealed that a sizable proportion of
patients with primary hypercholesterolemia exhibit high cholesterol
levels solely on the basis of enrichment of LDL particles with
cholesterol; the number of LDL particles, as reflected by LDLapo B
concentrations, was not increased. The hypothesis that high CETP
activities may enhance rates of redistribution of CE is supported by
the relatively strong correlations between CETP activities and
non-HDL/HDL ratios (Table 4
and Fig 6
). Moreover, it is well known that
patients with hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia
frequently have low HDL cholesterol concentrations, as observed in the
present study. This association seemingly adds support to the
concept that high levels of CETP in hypercholesterolemic states are
physiologically active in the redistribution of CE among the different
lipoprotein fractions.
A second but more tenuous possibility is that an augmentation of the cholesterol content of lipoprotein particles can slow their catabolism, which would further increase cholesterol concentrations. Although this mechanism has not been validated, it is consistent with the presence of elevated CETP activities in patients having increased concentrations of cholesterol in apo Bcontaining lipoproteins. If high CETP activities actually raise cholesterol concentrations beyond that caused by enrichment of lipoprotein particles with CE, a mechanism of this second type must be at play.
The findings of the present study do not exclude the alternate postulate for the relation between CETP activities and cholesterol concentrations, namely, that high cholesterol levels cause high CETP levels. If this proposal actually pertains, increased CETP levels presumably would have very little effect on cholesterol distribution among lipoproteins in a manner that would affect lipoprotein cholesterol levels. This hypothesis is based on two observations. First, high CETP activities have been reported in several different forms of hypercholesterolemia,9 10 11 12 13 14 which might imply a common secondary response; second, feeding of excess cholesterol raises CETP levels, both in rabbits28 and humans.29 Cholesterol feeding also increases mRNA for CETP in transgenic mice.30 These latter observations28 29 30 appear to be solid, but they may not be related to the first set of findings.9 10 11 12 13 14 The feeding of excess cholesterol undoubtedly raises tissue concentrations of cholesterol, and this could stimulate the synthesis of CETP independent of any action of dietary cholesterol to raise serum cholesterol levels. In other words, the rise in serum cholesterol per se might not be the cause of increased CETP activity.
If moderately high plasma concentrations of cholesterol indeed do directly induce an enhanced CETP synthesis and secretion, then regulation of CETP synthesis in tissues must be exquisitely sensitive to plasma cholesterol levels. It is questionable whether such a mechanism could be explained by increased receptor-mediated uptake of lipoproteins because this process tightly controls rate of entrance of cholesterol into cells. In other words, high plasma cholesterol concentrations per se do not of necessity indicate increased delivery of cholesterol into cells via LDL receptors. A nonreceptor pathway for lipoprotein cholesterol uptake more likely would have to be invoked, yet there is little evidence that nonreceptor uptake of cholesterol is significantly enhanced in the presence of moderate increases in plasma cholesterol concentrations. If such a process could elicit a striking increase in CETP synthesis, as would be required to explain the higher CETP levels observed in our patients, this would indeed be a remarkable response. If this explanation pertains, the critical question becomes: How can tissue regulatory enzymes for CETP synthesis sense the presence of elevated cholesterol concentrations in lipoproteins containing apo B-100? In the absence of a satisfactory answer to this question, we suggest that it is less likely that high cholesterol levels cause increased CETP activities than vice versa. Nonetheless, the former possibility deserves further investigation.
The finding that high CETP levels attend several different hypercholesterolemic states9 10 11 12 13 14 could actually support the concept that they raise cholesterol concentrations. For example, in patients who have modest defects in lipoprotein metabolism, the addition of a high CETP level might enhance the cholesterol level sufficiently to bring them to clinical notice. Of particular notice is the finding that patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinemia frequently have high CETP levels.12 The incidence of clinical dysbetalipoproteinemia in the patients with the apo E2/E2 genotype is relatively low, and it is conceivable that in E2/E2 patients, the presence of a high CETP level augments ß-VLDL levels by packing VLDL remnants with CE and retarding their catabolism. Thus, a high CETP level may be one factor that elicits the clinical picture of dysbetalipoproteinemia in patients with the E2/E2 genotype. A similar example occurs in patients with the nephrotic syndrome; those nephrotic patients who have cholesterol-enriched VLDL also have elevated CETP levels.13 14
Summary
The current study provides strong additional support for the
existence of a significant positive relation between the activity of
CETP and concentrations of LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol.
This relation has been documented in a large number of patients with
different forms of elevated cholesterol levels. The results are in
accord with the concept that high CETP levels are a definite factor
augmenting cholesterol levels. This seemingly is true for both primary
hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia. At the same time,
high CETP levels may help to confer the low HDL cholesterol levels
found in hypercholesterolemic patients, and this in turn could increase
the non-HDL/HDL ratio. The current observation that CETP activities are
positively correlated with cholesterol concentrations in apo
Bcontaining lipoproteins and inversely correlated with HDL
cholesterol levels lends support to the concept that CETP activities do
influence the concentrations of lipoprotein cholesterol. If future
studies can demonstrate with certainty a causal connection between high
CETP levels and these lipoprotein abnormalities, then high
concentrations of CETP could prove to be an important atherogenic
factor, as suggested by animal models,28 31 32 and
potentially could be a target for therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 25, 1994; accepted October 18, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Soro, M. Jauhiainen, C. Ehnholm, and M.-R. Taskinen Determinants of low HDL levels in familial combined hyperlipidemia J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1536 - 1544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Le Goff, M. Guerin, L. Petit, M. J. Chapman, and J. Thillet Regulation of human CETP gene expression: role of SP1 and SP3 transcription factors at promoter sites -690, -629, and -37 J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1322 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Berneis and R. M. Krauss Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2002; 43(9): 1363 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Escolà-Gil, J. Julve, A. Marzal-Casacuberta, J. Ordóñez-Llanos, F. González-Sastre, and F. Blanco-Vaca ApoA-II expression in CETP transgenic mice increases VLDL production and impairs VLDL clearance J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 241 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tholstrup, B. Sandstrom, A. Bysted, and G. Holmer Effect of 6 dietary fatty acids on the postprandial lipid profile, plasma fatty acids, lipoprotein lipase, and cholesterol ester transfer activities in healthy young men Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2001; 73(2): 198 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Grandjean, S. F. Crouse, and J. J. Rohack Influence of cholesterol status on blood lipid and lipoprotein enzyme responses to aerobic exercise J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2000; 89(2): 472 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jansen, J. Lopez-Miranda, P. Castro, F. Lopez-Segura, C. Marin, J. M Ordovas, E. Paz, J. Jimenez-Pereperez, F. Fuentes, and F. Perez-Jimenez Low-fat and high-monounsaturated fatty acid diets decrease plasma cholesterol ester transfer protein concentrations in young, healthy, normolipemic men Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2000; 72(1): 36 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Lewis-Barned, W. H. F. Sutherland, R. J. Walker, H. L. Walker, S. A. de Jong, E. A. Edwards, and V. H. Markham Plasma Cholesterol Esterification And Transfer, the Menopause, And Hormone Replacement Therapy in Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1999; 84(10): 3534 - 3538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Bersot, G. L. Vega, S. M. Grundy, K. E. Palaoglu, P. Atagündüz, S. Özbayrakçi, O. Gökdemir, and R. W. Mahley Elevated hepatic lipase activity and low levels of high density lipoprotein in a normotriglyceridemic, nonobese Turkish population J. Lipid Res., March 1, 1999; 40(3): 432 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Tahvanainen, P. Pajukanta, K. Porkka, S. Nieminen, L. Ikavalko, I. Nuotio, M.-R. Taskinen, L. Peltonen, and C. Ehnholm Haplotypes of the ApoA-I/C-III/A-IV Gene Cluster and Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 1998; 18(11): 1810 - 1817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sasai, K. Okumura-Noji, T. Hibino, R. Ikeuchi, N. Sakuma, T. Fujinami, and S. Yokoyama Human cholesteryl ester transfer protein measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with two monoclonal antibodies against rabbit cholesteryl ester transfer protein: plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lipoproteins among Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients Clin. Chem., July 1, 1998; 44(7): 1466 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bruce, D. S. Sharp, and A. R. Tall Relationship of HDL and coronary heart disease to a common amino acid polymorphism in the cholesteryl ester transfer protein in men with and without hypertriglyceridemia J. Lipid Res., May 1, 1998; 39(5): 1071 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Krimbou, M. Tremblay, H. Jacques, J. Davignon, and J. S. Cohn In vitro factors affecting the concentration of gamma-LpE ({gamma}-LpE) in human plasma J. Lipid Res., April 1, 1998; 39(4): 861 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sugano, N. Makino, S. Sawada, S. Otsuka, M. Watanabe, H. Okamoto, M. Kamada, and A. Mizushima Effect of Antisense Oligonucleotides against Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein on the Development of Atherosclerosis in Cholesterol-fed Rabbits J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 1998; 273(9): 5033 - 5036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Tato, G. L. Vega, and S. M. Grundy Determinants of Plasma HDL-Cholesterol in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients: Role of Cholesterol-Ester Transfer Protein and Lecithin Cholesteryl Acyl Transferase Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 1997; 17(1): 56 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Foger, A. Ritsch, A. Doblinger, H. Wessels, and J. R. Patsch Relationship of Plasma Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein to HDL Cholesterol: Studies in Normotriglyceridemia and Moderate Hypertriglyceridemia Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 1996; 16(12): 1430 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||