| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Editorials |
From the Department of Laboratory Medicine (T.W.K.), University of California, San Francisco; the Department of Internal Medicine (K.A.G., A.K.B.), Loyola University & Hines VA Hospital, Maywood, Ill; the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology (R.L.D.), University of Iowa, Iowa City; and the Department of Physiology and Biophysics (J.E.H.), University of Mississippi, Jackson.
Correspondence to Theodore W. Kurtz, MD, Professor of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0134, 185 Berry Street, Suite 290, San Francisco, CA 94107. E-mail KurtzT@Labmed2.ucsf.edu
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Accurate and meaningful measurements of blood pressure (BP) are often critical to the interpretation of studies of vascular biology, atherosclerosis, and other forms of cardiovascular disease. Although many research scientists have embraced advanced molecular technologies for studying cardiovascular function and disease pathogenesis, a surprising number of the same investigators continue to use suboptimal techniques for measuring BP in experimental animals. To address this problem and assist investigators in selecting optimal methods for BP monitoring, the American Heart Association (AHA) has developed a scientific statement on recommendations for BP measurement in experimental animals. These recommendations for BP measurement are briefly summarized in this article. The complete text and discussion of the recommendations are published online in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology as well as in print in other AHA journals.1 Comprehensive recommendations for BP measurement in humans have also been developed and are published in the AHA journal Hypertension.2
See page e22
BP Measurement Methods
The techniques for measuring BP in experimental animals have improved considerably over the past decade, and several methods are available that allow routine monitoring of BP profiles throughout the day and night over prolonged periods of time in conscious, unrestrained, unstressed animals. Techniques for measuring BP in experimental animals can be divided into indirect methods and direct methods, and the technical details of these methods along with their advantages and disadvantages are discussed in the full report.1 The most commonly used indirect method for monitoring BP is the cuff technique, in which BP is measured in a tail
Related Article:
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005 25: e22-e33.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Falcao, C. Solomon, C. Monat, J. Berube, J. Gutkowska, and J. L. Lavoie Impact of diet and stress on the development of preeclampsia-like symptoms in p57kip2 mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): H119 - H126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Caron, J. Hagaman, T. Nishikimi, H.-S. Kim, and O. Smithies Adrenomedullin gene expression differences in mice do not affect blood pressure but modulate hypertension-induced pathology in males PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3420 - 3425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, K. K. Griendling, A. Dikalova, G. K. Owens, and W. R. Taylor Vascular Hypertrophy in Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension Is Mediated by Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell-Derived H2O2 Hypertension, October 1, 2005; 46(4): 732 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |