This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Olin, J. W. Articles by Fuster, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Olin, J. W. Articles by Fuster, V.

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2003;23:1721.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorials

Acute Aortic Dissection

The Need for Rapid, Accurate, and Readily Available Diagnostic Strategies

Jeffrey W. Olin; Valentin Fuster

From the Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York.

Correspondence to Jeffrey W. Olin, DO, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Pl, Box 1033, New York, NY 10029. E-mail jeffrey.olin@msnyuhealth.org

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

Aortic dissection may be fatal without early diagnosis and appropriate medical, surgical, or endovascular treatment. The presenting symptoms and signs are so myriad and nonspecific that dissection may be overlooked initially in up to 40% of cases. In addition, the diagnosis is established only postmortem in a substantial number of cases.¹ Few other conditions demand such prompt diagnosis and treatment, because the mortality rate of untreated dissection approaches 1%/h during the first 48 hours, 80% at 14 days, and 90% at three months.² If unrecognized and untreated, fewer than 10% of patients with proximal aortic dissection survive a year. Most patients succumb within the first 3 months,³ usually of acute aortic insufficiency, major branch vessel occlusion, or rupture into the pericardium, mediastinum, or left hemithorax. In 20 years of follow-up of 527 patients with aortic dissection, nearly 30% of late deaths were due to ruptured aortic aneurysm.⁴

See page 1839

The most frequently used modalities to identify dissection and define the sites of origin and termination are computerized tomography (CT), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The primary diagnostic criterion for diagnosis of aortic dissection by CT is demonstration of two contrast-filled lumens separated by an intimal flap.⁵ The sensitivity of CT ranges from 93% to 100% and specificity from 87% to 100%.^5,6 Inaccuracy may result from inadequate contrast opacification, nonvisualization of the intimal flap, artifacts extending across the aortic lumen that simulate an intimal flap, misinterpretation of adjacent vessels or prominent sinus of Valsalva as the flap, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q. Liu, J. P. Lu, F. Wang, L. Wang, and J. M. Tian Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of Aortic Dissection: A Pictorial Essay RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1311 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Santini and A. Mazzucco Reply to ates. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 199 - 200. [Full Text] [PDF]