Vascular Biology |
-Irradiation on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Matrix
From the Division of Vascular Surgery of the General Surgical Services, Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Glenn M. LaMuraglia, MD, Division of Vascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.
Abstract
-Irradiation
(
-RT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) are known to inhibit intimal
hyperplasia. The common mechanism is that both modalities produce free
radicals, but unlike
-RT, PDT generates them through the absorption
of light by photosensitizers. The purpose of this in vitro study was to
assess the differences that PDT and
-RT have on the
fibroproliferative response after vascular injury by comparing their
effects on vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and on the extracellular
matrix (ECM). Mitochondrial activity (tetrazolium salt), proliferation
([3H]thymidine incorporation), and the mechanisms of cell
death (terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferasemediated dUTP biotin nick end labeling [TUNEL] staining)
were used to assess differences between PDT (100 J/cm2) and
-RT (10 or 20 Gy) on SMC injury. The different effects on
bioregulatory molecules were investigated by quantitating the
proliferation of SMCs cultured with conditioned medium and on treated
ECM. PDT of SMCs reduced proliferation and mitochondrial activity
(0.5±0.75% and 1.7±4.25%, respectively, P<0.0001),
whereas
-RT of SMCs decreased cell proliferation but did not affect
metabolic activity. Stimulation with calf serum of
-RTtreated SMCs did not affect proliferation but increased
mitochondrial enzyme activity (160±11%, P<0.0005).
The conditioned medium, derived from PDT- but not
-RTtreated SMCs,
did not stimulate effector SMC proliferation compared with
-RTtreated SMCs (16±4.1% versus 80±16.8%,
P<0.0001). Apoptosis was the principle
cytotoxic mechanism after PDT, whereas
-RT cells were growth
arrested but viable. PDT of the ECM reduced effector SMC proliferation
compared with controls and
-RT cells (18±6.5% versus 100±17.7%
and 84±8.9%, respectively, P<0.0001). These data
suggest that
-RT and PDT may inhibit restenosis but by
different mechanisms. The effects of PDT are more diverse and may
result in improved outcome while avoiding the teratogenic exposure due
to ionizing irradiation.
Key Words: restenosis photodynamic therapy ionizing irradiation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R Mansfield, S Bown, and J McEwan Photodynamic therapy: shedding light on restenosis Heart, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 612 - 618. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Chen, K. W. Woodburn, C. Shi, D. C. Adelman, C. Rogers, and D. I. Simon Photodynamic Therapy With Motexafin Lutetium Induces Redox-Sensitive Apoptosis of Vascular Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(5): 759 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. LaMuraglia, J. Schiereck, J. Heckenkamp, G. Nigri, P. Waterman, D. Leszczynski, and S. Kossodo Photodynamic Therapy Induces Apoptosis in Intimal Hyperplastic Arteries Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2000; 157(3): 867 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |