Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999;19:2154-2161

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckenkamp, J.
Right arrow Articles by LaMuraglia, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heckenkamp, J.
Right arrow Articles by LaMuraglia, G. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biochemistry and metabolism
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Oxidant stress
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999;19:2154-2161.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Vascular Biology

Different Effects of Photodynamic Therapy and {gamma}-Irradiation on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Matrix

Implications for Inhibiting Restenosis

Joerg Heckenkamp; Dariusz Leszczynski; Jan Schiereck; Justin Kung; Glenn M. LaMuraglia

From the Division of Vascular Surgery of the General Surgical Services, Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Glenn M. LaMuraglia, MD, Division of Vascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.

Abstract{gamma}-Irradiation ({gamma}-RT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) are known to inhibit intimal hyperplasia. The common mechanism is that both modalities produce free radicals, but unlike {gamma}-RT, PDT generates them through the absorption of light by photosensitizers. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the differences that PDT and {gamma}-RT have on the fibroproliferative response after vascular injury by comparing their effects on vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and on the extracellular matrix (ECM). Mitochondrial activity (tetrazolium salt), proliferation ([3H]thymidine incorporation), and the mechanisms of cell death (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP biotin nick end labeling [TUNEL] staining) were used to assess differences between PDT (100 J/cm2) and {gamma}-RT (10 or 20 Gy) on SMC injury. The different effects on bioregulatory molecules were investigated by quantitating the proliferation of SMCs cultured with conditioned medium and on treated ECM. PDT of SMCs reduced proliferation and mitochondrial activity (0.5±0.75% and 1.7±4.25%, respectively, P<0.0001), whereas {gamma}-RT of SMCs decreased cell proliferation but did not affect metabolic activity. Stimulation with calf serum of {gamma}-RT–treated SMCs did not affect proliferation but increased mitochondrial enzyme activity (160±11%, P<0.0005). The conditioned medium, derived from PDT- but not {gamma}-RT–treated SMCs, did not stimulate effector SMC proliferation compared with {gamma}-RT–treated SMCs (16±4.1% versus 80±16.8%, P<0.0001). Apoptosis was the principle cytotoxic mechanism after PDT, whereas {gamma}-RT cells were growth arrested but viable. PDT of the ECM reduced effector SMC proliferation compared with controls and {gamma}-RT cells (18±6.5% versus 100±17.7% and 84±8.9%, respectively, P<0.0001). These data suggest that {gamma}-RT and PDT may inhibit restenosis but by different mechanisms. The effects of PDT are more diverse and may result in improved outcome while avoiding the teratogenic exposure due to ionizing irradiation.


Key Words: restenosis • photodynamic therapy • ionizing irradiation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
R Mansfield, S Bown, and J McEwan
Photodynamic therapy: shedding light on restenosis
Heart, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 612 - 618.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Z. Chen, K. W. Woodburn, C. Shi, D. C. Adelman, C. Rogers, and D. I. Simon
Photodynamic Therapy With Motexafin Lutetium Induces Redox-Sensitive Apoptosis of Vascular Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(5): 759 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
G. M. LaMuraglia, J. Schiereck, J. Heckenkamp, G. Nigri, P. Waterman, D. Leszczynski, and S. Kossodo
Photodynamic Therapy Induces Apoptosis in Intimal Hyperplastic Arteries
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2000; 157(3): 867 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]