Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1998;18:1927-1933

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Björnheden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wiklund, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Björnheden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wiklund, O.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHOLESTEROL
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1998;18:1927-1933.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Direct Assessment of Lipoprotein Outflow From In Vivo–Labeled Arterial Tissue as Determined in an In Vitro Perfusion System

T. Björnheden; G. Bondjers; O. Wiklund

From the Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden.

Correspondence to Dr Tom Björnheden, The Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden. E-mail tom.bjornheden{at}wlab.wall.gu.se

Abstract—The rate of cholesterol deposition during the atherosclerotic process is determined by the balance between the inflow and outflow of plasma lipoproteins in the arterial wall. Whereas the rate of inflow may be measured directly, the rate of outflow has most often been calculated indirectly from lipoprotein uptake by using the 2-compartment model. One objection against such calculations is that lipoprotein binding is not being considered. In the present study 2 different protocols were used to obtain a direct measure of the outflow of lipoproteins from atherosclerotic rabbit aortas. Thus, 3 rabbits with experimental atherosclerosis were given 125I-LDL intravenously and 3 were given [14C]cholesterol perorally. Twenty-four hours later the aortas were removed and the outflow of label was monitored during in vitro perfusion. Despite the different protocols, our results were consistent and indicated that fractional loss relative to whole tissue was {approx}0.01 pool/h, which is 1 order of magnitude lower than current estimates based on the 2-compartment model (0.04 to 0.4 pool/h). Furthermore, whereas as much as 2/3 to 3/4 of the tracer that had entered the arterial wall was effectively trapped, the remainder equilibrated at a faster rate (0.06 pool/h). In conclusion, it seems that tissue binding constitutes a prominent and possibly underrated mechanism of lipoprotein deposition, at least in the atherosclerotic rabbit aorta. Furthermore, this means that current estimates of lipoprotein exchange parameters based on the 2-compartment model (eg, fractional loss) may rest on invalid assumptions and should be regarded with caution.


Key Words: arterial wall • atherosclerosis • lipoprotein outflow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. D. Proctor and J. C.L. Mamo
Intimal Retention of Cholesterol Derived From Apolipoprotein B100- and Apolipoprotein B48-Containing Lipoproteins in Carotid Arteries of Watanabe Heritable Hyperlipidemic Rabbits
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2003; 23(9): 1595 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]